@inbook{nokey,

title = {Is Spotify the New Radio? The Scope of the Right to Remuneration for "Secondary Uses" in Respect of Audio Streaming Services},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/is-spotify-making-available/},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-12-16},

urldate = {2022-12-16},

booktitle = {Gestaltung der Informationsrechtsordnung: Festschrift f\"{u}r Thomas Dreier zum 65. Geburtstag, Fischer, Nolte, Senftleben \& Specht-Riemenschneider (ed.), C.H. Beck: M\"{u}nchen},

pages = {161-176},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {ALLEA Statement on Open Access Publication under “Big Deals” and the New Copyright Rules},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/12/12/allea-statement-on-open-access-publication-under-big-deals-and-the-new-copyright-rules/},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-12-12},

journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 2 oktober 2020 (Stichting Lira / Ziggo, Delta Fiber Nederland \& Vereniging Rechtenoverleg voor distributie van audiovisuele producties)},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/annotatie_nj_2022_225/},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-08-03},

journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie},

number = {225},

issue = {30},

pages = {4168-4170},

abstract = {Auteursrecht. Vermoeden van overdracht auteursrechten op filmwerken aan producent film (art. 45d (oud) Aw); verhouding tot eerdere overdracht door auteur van zijn rechten aan collectieve beheersorganisatie. Collectief rechtenbeheer op grond van art. 26a Aw; begrip ‘doorgifte via de kabel’; moet worden teruggekomen van HR 28 maart 2014, NJ 2015/365 (Norma/NLKabel)?},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {De playlists van Spotify: Hoe ver reikt het nabuurrechtelijke vergoedingsrecht met betrekking tot audiostreamingdiensten?},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/auteursrecht_2022_2/},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-06-07},

journal = {Auteursrecht},

issue = {2},

pages = {75-84},

abstract = {Op grond van art. 7 lid 1 WNR vallen onder het vergoedingsrecht voor ‘secundair gebruik’ alle mogelijke vormen van openbaarmaking van commercieel uitgebrachte fonogrammen, doch niet het online beschikbaar stellen. Algemeen wordt aangenomen dat het vergoedingsrecht niet geldt voor het streamen via Spotify en dergelijke diensten. Maar geldt dat ook voor de door Spotify aangeboden playlists en vergelijkbare omroepachtige diensten? In dit artikel wordt een poging gedaan criteria te formuleren aan de hand waarvan het ‘beschikbaar stellen’ van andere vormen van openbaarmaking kan worden onderscheiden.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@workingpaper{nokey,

title = {Groundhog Day in Geneva: The WIPO Broadcasting Treaty is on the Agenda Once Again},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/the-wipo-broadcasting-treaty-revisited/},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-05-06},

note = {Draft paper prepared for American University International Law Review Symposium on the Right

to Research in International Copyright Law, April 22, 2022},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {workingpaper}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie van de EU 8 september 2020 (Recorded Artists Actors Performers / Phonographic Performance (Ireland))},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/annotatie_nj_2022_126/},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-04-19},

journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie},

number = {126},

issue = {15},

pages = {2384-2386},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {DJs are Phonogram Producers, says Dutch Supreme Court},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/01/31/djs-are-phonogram-producers-says-dutch-supreme-court/},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-01-31},

journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2021d,

title = {Copyright and Artificial Creation: Does EU Copyright Law Protect AI-Assisted Output?},

author = {Hugenholtz, P. and Quintais, J.},

url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40319-021-01115-0},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-021-01115-0},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-10-07},

urldate = {2021-10-07},

journal = {IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law },

volume = {52},

number = {9},

pages = {1190-1216},

abstract = {This article queries whether and to what extent works produced with the aid of AI systems \textendash AI-assisted output \textendash are protected under EU copyright standards. We carry out a doctrinal legal analysis to scrutinise the concepts of “work”, “originality” and “creative freedom”, as well as the notion of authorship, as set forth in the EU copyright acquis and developed in the case-law of the Court of Justice. On this basis, we develop a four-step test to assess whether AI-assisted output qualifies as an original work of authorship under EU law, and how the existing rules on authorship may apply. Our conclusion is that current EU copyright rules are generally suitable and sufficiently flexible to deal with the challenges posed by AI-assisted output.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2021b,

title = {Auteursrecht en artifici\"{e}le creatie},

author = {Hugenholtz, P. and Quintais, J.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Auteursrecht-2021-2.pdf},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-06-17},

journal = {Auteursrecht},

number = {2},

pages = {47-52},

abstract = {In dit artikel wordt de vraag gesteld of voortbrengselen die met behulp van AI-systemen tot stand zijn gebracht auteursrechtelijk beschermd kunnen zijn. Centraal in deze analyse staat niet de machine, maar de rol van de mens in het door het AI-systeem ondersteunde creatieve proces. Is deze rol voldoende om het resultaat als auteursrechtelijke beschermd werk te kwalificeren? En wie heeft in dat geval te gelden als maker(s)? Deze vragen worden aan de hand van het Unierecht en de jurisprudentie van het HvJ EU beantwoord. Dit artikel is gebaseerd op een studie die in opdracht van de Europese Commissie is verricht en aan de basis ligt van het door de Commissie in het Actieplan IE geformuleerde

beleidsstandpunt over AI-creaties.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2021bb,

title = {Three Cheers for the DSM Directive’s Rules on Author’s Contracts \textendash and a Cautionary Note from the Netherlands},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2021/06/14/three-cheers-for-the-dsm-directives-rules-on-authors-contracts-and-a-cautionary-note-from-the-netherlands/},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-06-14},

journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2021,

title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 11 juni 2020 (Brompton Bicycle / Chedech/Get2Get},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2021_175.pdf},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-06-04},

journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie},

number = {22},

pages = {3136-3138},

abstract = {Verzoek om een prejudici\"{e}le beslissing krachtens artikel 267 VWEU, ingediend door de tribunal de l’entreprise de Li\`{e}ge (ondernemingsrechtbank Luik, Belgi\"{e}) bij beslissing van 18 december 2018. Intellectuele en industri\"{e}le eigendom, auteursrecht en naburige rechten. Vouwfiets. Bescherming van werken op grond van het auteursrecht. Voor het bereiken van een technisch resultaat noodzakelijke vorm.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2020h,

title = {Artikel 18-23 DSM-richtlijn: Exploitatiecontracten},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AMI_2020_6.pdf},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-12-18},

journal = {AMI},

volume = {2020},

number = {6},

pages = {187-192},

abstract = {De DSM-richtlijn van 17 april 2019 bevat een zestal bepalingen op het gebied van het auteurscontractenrecht. Artikelen 18 tot en met 23 hebben niet alleen betrekking op de ‘billijke vergoeding van auteurs en uitvoerende kunstenaars in exploitatiecontracten’, zoals het opschrift van titel IV, hoofdstuk 3 van de richtlijn belooft, maar ook op transparantie, geschillenbeslechting en het recht op herroeping van verleende rechten. Hoewel de meeste van deze onderwerpen reeds een plaats hebben gevonden in hoofdstuk 1a van de huidige Auteurswet, noopt de richtlijn op

een aantal punten tot wetswijziging. Dat geldt in het bijzonder voor de transparantieplicht, die in de huidige wet niet voorkomt. In deze bijdrage, onderdeel van een reeks van AMI-artikelen over de DSM-richtlijn, worden de auteurscontractenrechtelijke bepalingen van de richtlijn en de omzetting ervan besproken.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2020g,

title = {Trends and Developments in Artificial Intelligence: Challenges to Copyright},

author = {Hugenholtz, P. and Quintais, J. and Gervais, D.J.},

url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2020/12/16/trends-and-developments-in-artificial-intelligence-challenges-to-copyright/},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-12-17},

journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@techreport{Hugenholtz2020f,

title = {Trends and Developments in Artificial Intelligence: Challenges to the Intellectual Property Rights Framework: Final Report},

author = {Hugenholtz, P. and Quintais, J. and Gervais, D.J. and Hartmann, C. and Allan, J.},

url = {https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/394345a1-2ecf-11eb-b27b-01aa75ed71a1/language-en

https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Trends_and_Developments_in_Artificial_Intelligence-1.pdf},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-11-27},

abstract = {This report examines copyright and patent protection in Europe for AI-assisted outputs in general and in three priority domains: science (in particular, meteorology), media (journalism), and pharmaceutical research. It comprises an assessment of the state of the art of uses of AI in the three focus areas, and a legal analysis of how IP laws currently apply to AI-assisted creative and innovative outputs. The report concludes that the current state of the art in AI does not require or justify immediate substantive changes in copyright and patent law in Europe. The existing concepts of copyright and patent law are sufficiently abstract and flexible to meet the current challenges from AI. In addition, related rights regimes potentially extend to ‘authorless’ AI productions in a variety of sectors, and the sui generis database right may offer protection to AI-produced databases resulting from substantial investment. However, taking into account the practical implications of AI technologies, the report identifies specific avenues for future legal reform (if justified by empirical evidence), offers recommendations for improvements in the application of existing rules (e.g. via guidelines), and highlights the need to study the role of alternative IP regimes to protect AI-assisted outputs, such as trade secret protection, unfair competition and contract law.},

note = {Report written for the European Commission by P.B. Hugenholtz, D. Gervais, J.P. Quintais, C. Hartmann \& J. Allan, completed September 2020. ISBN: 97892762244488},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}

@techreport{vanGompel2020b,

title = {Evaluatie Wet Auteurscontractenrecht: Eindrapport},

author = {van Gompel, S. and Hugenholtz, P. and Poort, J. and Schumacher, L.D. and Visser, D.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/evaluatie_wet_auteurscontractenrecht_2020.pdf





},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-10-29},

urldate = {2020-10-29},

abstract = {Onderzoek in opdracht van het Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- en Documentatiecentrum (WODC), ministerie van Justitie \& Veiligheid.



Van de Wet Auteurscontractenrecht, die ten doel heeft om de contractuele positie van auteurs en uitvoerende kunstenaars te versterken, wordt in de praktijk nog weinig gebruik gemaakt. De Wet, die in 2015 als een nieuw onderdeel van de Auteurswet werd ingevoerd, belooft auteurs en artiesten die met exploitanten in zee gaan een ‘billijke vergoeding', geeft makers de kans om contracten open te breken en verbiedt oneerlijke contractsbepalingen. Auteurs en artiesten blijken maar zelden op de bepalingen van de Wet een beroep te doen. Daarbij lijkt de angst voor verlies aan opdrachten of om op een zwarte lijst te komen een belangrijke rol te spelen. Ook blijkt de door de Wet in het leven geroepen laagdrempelige geschillenprocedure nauwelijks te functioneren. Dit zijn enkele van de conclusies van een praktijkevaluatie van de Wet Auteurscontractenrecht die door onderzoekers van de Universiteit van Amsterdam en de Universiteit Leiden in opdracht van het WODC is uitgevoerd.



See also the summary and conclusions in English here:



https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Evaluatie-ACR-Eindrapport-Summary-and-conclusions.pdf



https://www.wodc.nl/wodc-nieuws-2020/auteurscontractenrecht.aspx},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2020e,

title = {Annotatie bij HvJ EU 29 juli 2019, C-469/17 (Funke), C-516/17 (Spiegel) \& C-4476/17 (Pelham)},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2020_354.pdf},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-10-23},

journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie},

number = {43},

pages = {6068-6073},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2020d,

title = {De kunstmatige maker: over de gevolgen van het Endstra-arrest voor de bescherming van artifici\"{e}le creaties},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/IER_2020_5.pdf},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-10-01},

journal = {Intellectuele Eigendom \& Reclamerecht (IER)},

number = {5},

pages = {276-280},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2020c,

title = {Annotatie bij Rb Amsterdam 1 november 2019 (Van Uem / De Persgroep)},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_AMI_2020_3_4.pdf},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-07-24},

journal = {AMI},

number = {3-4},

pages = {101-105},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Metzger2020,

title = {Selected Aspects of Implementing Article 17 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market into National Law \textendash Comment of the European Copyright Society},

author = {Metzger, A. and Senftleben, M. and Derclaye E. and Dreier, T. and Geiger, C. and Griffiths, J. and Hilty, R. and Hugenholtz, P. and Riis, T. and Rognstad, O.A. and Strowel, A.M. and Synodinou, T. and Xalabarder, R.},

url = {https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3589323},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-05-07},

abstract = {The national implementation of Article 17 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (DSMD) poses particular challenges. Article 17 is one of the most complex \textendash and most controversial \textendash provisions of the new legislative package which EU Member States must transpose into national law by 7 June 2021. Seeking to contribute to the debate on implementation options, the European Copyright Society addresses several core aspects of Article 17 that may play an important role in the national implementation process. It deals with the concept of online content-sharing service providers (OCSSPs) before embarking on a discussion of the licensing and content moderation duties which OCSSPs must fulfil in accordance with Article 17(1) and (4). The analysis also focuses on the copyright limitations mentioned in Article 17(7) that support the creation and dissemination of transformative user-generated content (UGC). It also discusses the appropriate configuration of complaint and redress mechanisms set forth in Article 17(9) that seek to reduce the risk of unjustified content removals. Finally, the European Copyright Society addresses the possibility of implementing direct remuneration claims for authors and performers, and explores the private international law aspect of applicable law \textendash an impact factor that is often overlooked in the debate.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Quintais2020b,

title = {Safeguarding User Freedoms in Implementing Article 17 of the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive: Recommendations from European Academics},

author = {Quintais, J. and Frosio, G. and van Gompel, S. and Hugenholtz, P. and Husovec, M. and J\"{u}tte, B.J. and Senftleben, M.},

url = {https://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-10-3-2019/5042},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-02-25},

journal = {JIPITEC},

volume = {vol. 10},

number = {nr. 3 - 2019},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2020b,

title = {In Memoriam Jan Kabel},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AMI_2020_1.pdf},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-02-20},

journal = {AMI},

number = {1},

pages = {1-2},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2020,

title = {Film Financing in the Digital Single Market: Challenges to Territoriality},

author = {Hugenholtz, P. and Poort, J.},

url = {https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs40319-019-00900-2.pdf},

doi = {10.1007/s40319-019-00900-2},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-01-30},

journal = {IIC},

volume = {51},

number = {2},

pages = {167-186},

abstract = {This article discusses the role of territorial licences for feature films against the background of judicial and market developments in the EU. Currently, territorial licences are deemed a cornerstone of the exploitation and financing of films in Europe. However, current models of film financing are under increasing pressure both from market developments such as the turbulent growth of global online video platforms, and from developments in EU law aimed at removing national territorial barriers to the Single Market. Examples are the rule of Union-wide exhaustion of the distribution right, the EU Portability Regulation and the country of origin rules for satellite broadcasting and online simulcasting. EU competition law sets additional limits to grants of territorial exclusivity, and prohibits clauses in broadcasting and pay television licences that prevent or restrict “passive” sales to consumers/viewers in non-licensed territories. The freedom of right holders to preserve territorial exclusivity by way of contract is likely to become increasingly vulnerable to EU competition law, as underlying territorial rights no longer support territorial grants. For the film sector where territorial exclusivity remains indispensable, the European Commission could create specific competition law rules in the form of “block exemptions”. Language exclusivity \textendash i.e. exclusive grants of rights for distinct language versions of a film \textendash could provide a practical and legally more robust alternative to territorial licensing.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@book{Goldstein2019,

title = {International Copyright: Principles, Law, and Practice},

author = {Goldstein, P. and Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://global.oup.com/academic/product/international-copyright-9780190060619?q=goldstein%20hugenholtz\&lang=en\&cc=nl},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-12-23},

publisher = {Oxford University Press},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {book}

}

@article{Quintais2019g,

title = {Safeguarding User Freedoms in Implementing Article 17 of the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive: Recommendations from European Academics},

author = {Quintais, J. and Frosio, G. and van Gompel, S. and Hugenholtz, P. and Husovec, M. and J\"{u}tte, B.J. and Senftleben, M.},

url = {https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3484968},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-11-12},

abstract = {On 17 May 2019 the new Directive (EU) 2019/790 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market was officially published (DSM Directive).  Article 17 (ex-Article 13) is one of its most controversial provisions. Article 17(10) tasks the Commission with organising stakeholder dialogues to ensure uniform application of the obligation of cooperation between online content-sharing service providers (OCSSPs) and rightholders, and to establish best practices with regard to appropriate industry standards of professional diligence.

This document offers recommendations on user freedoms and safeguards included in Article 17 of the DSM Directive \textendash namely in its paragraphs (7) and (9) \textendash and should be read in the context of the stakeholder dialogue mentioned in paragraph (10).},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2019h,

title = {Annotatie bij Rb Noord-Nederland 24 juli 2019 (Piet Hein Eek / Dudink)},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_AMI_2019_5.pdf},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-10-31},

journal = {AMI},

volume = {2019},

number = {5},

pages = {180-181},

abstract = {Meubelontwerper Piet Hein Eek heeft auteursrecht op de door hem ontworpen meubels van sloophout. Een aantal van de door gedaagde vervaardigde sloophouten tafels en stoelen maken wegens overeenstemmende totaalindrukken inbreuk op het auteursrecht van Eek. Vordering tot vergoeding van schade wegens winstderving toelaatbaar. Geen vergoeding wegens waardevermindering van het

auteursrecht.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2019i,

title = {Artikelen 3 en 4 DSM-richtlijn: tekst- en datamining},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AMI_2019_5.pdf},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-10-31},

journal = {AMI},

volume = {2019},

number = {5},

pages = {167-171},

abstract = {Tekst- en datamining (TDM) \textendash het geautomatiseerd analyseren van grote hoeveelheden ongestructureerde tekst en data \textendash is niet meer weg te denken uit de wetenschap, en speelt daarnaast een steeds grotere rol in een veelheid van andere domeinen, vari\"{e}rend van journalistiek tot artifici\"{e}le intelligentie. De nieuwe DSMrichtlijn voorziet daarom in een tweetal beperkingen van het auteursrecht en het databankenrecht ten aanzien van tekst- en datamining: de ene ten behoeve van nonprofit wetenschappelijk onderzoek (art. 3), de andere voor andere doeleinden (art. 4). Daarmee ontstaat de indruk dat de richtlijn voor TDM ruim baan heeft gemaakt, maar deze schijn bedriegt. Rechthebbenden kunnen door middel van een ‘opt-out’ tekst- en datamining voor commerci\"{e}le doeleinden uitsluiten of aan licenties onderwerpen. In dit artikel worden de TDM-bepalingen van de DSMrichtlijn kritisch besproken. Daaraan gaat vooraf een kort expos\'{e} over tekst- en datamining en de stand van zaken naar huidig auteursrecht.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2019g,

title = {Annotatie bij HvJ EU 31 mei 2016 (Reha Training), HvJ EU 29 november 2017 (Vcast) en HvJ EU 7 augustus 2018 (Renckoff)},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2019_371.pdf},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-10-22},

journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie},

volume = {2019},

number = {43},

pages = {6142-6145},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2019f,

title = {Neighbouring Rights are Obsolete},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/IIC_2019.pdf},

doi = {10.1007/s40319-019-00864-3},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-09-03},

journal = {IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law},

abstract = {Neighbouring rights based on technological investment that do not provide for a threshold test and corresponding rule of scope, such as the phonographic right, the broadcaster’s right and Europe’s film producer’s right, are outdated and inherently unbalanced. The new press publisher’s right introduced by the EU DSM Directive is similarly unbalanced.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@inbook{nokey,

title = {The Creeping Unification of Copyright in Europe },

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/unification-territoriality/},

isbn = {9789403503554},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-07-31},

urldate = {2019-07-31},

booktitle = {Pluralism or Universalism in International Copyright Law},

volume = {43},

pages = {77-95},

publisher = {Wolters Kluwer},

chapter = {2},

series = {Information Law Series},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2019e,

title = {The New Copyright Directive: Text and Data Mining (Articles 3 and 4)},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2019/07/24/the-new-copyright-directive-text-and-data-mining-articles-3-and-4/},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-07-25},

journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2019d,

title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 6 oktober 2017 (Imation / Thuiskopie en Staat)},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2019_182.pdf},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-06-04},

journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie},

volume = {2019},

number = {21/22},

pages = {3068-3070},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2019c,

title = {The WIPO Broadcasting Treaty. A Conceptual Conundrum},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/EIPR_2019_4.pdf},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-04-04},

journal = {European Intellectual Property Review},

volume = {2019},

number = {4},

pages = {199-202},

abstract = {The Broadcasting Treaty that has been discussed at WIPO for over twenty years, seems to be reaching a dead end. The Treaty that aims at extending the legal protection of broadcasters to the digital realm, suffers from three serious flaws: one economic, one conceptual and one pragmatic. Due to the decreasing technical costs of broadcasting, the economic case for granting special rights to broadcasters is weakening. Moreover, properly defining the act of ‘broadcasting’ that would give rise to legal protection, is highly problematic. Finally, no real and urgent need for a new right seems to exist, in light of current legal regimes that broadcasters already rely on under national law. Perhaps the time has come to abandon work on the WIPO Broadcasting Treaty, and move on.},

note = {This opinion is based on a keynote speech delivered at the KEI Seminar, "Appraising the WIPO Broadcast treaty and its Implications on Access to Culture", Geneva, 3-4 October 2018.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2019b,

title = {Openbaarheid van tarieven en licentievoorwaarden van cbo’s},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AMI_2019_1_PBH.pdf},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-02-21},

journal = {AMI},

volume = {2019},

number = {1},

pages = {1-8},

abstract = {Op grond van de Wet toezicht zijn collectieve beheersorganisaties verplicht

‘standaardlicentieovereenkomsten

en normaal toepasselijke tarieven’ actief openbaar

te maken. Over de betekenis en reikwijdte van deze verplichting bestaat in

Nederland onduidelijkheid en zelfs onenigheid, maar (nog) geen jurisprudentie. In dit

artikel wordt gepoogd om, mede aan de hand van een analyse van de rechtsgronden

van deze verplichting, te komen tot een juiste en in de praktijk hanteerbare

interpretatie van de openbaarheidsplicht.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@techreport{Poort2019,

title = {Film Financing and the Digital Single Market: its Future, the Role of Territoriality and New Models of Financing},

author = {Poort, J. and Hugenholtz, P. and Lindhout, P. and Til, G. van},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/IPOL_STU2019629186_EN.pdf},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-01-17},

abstract = {This report studies the role of territoriality in film financing, the legal and market challenges territoriality faces as a key model for film financing and the consequences if EU policies were to reduce or mitigate the scope of territorial exclusivity in the audiovisual sector. It provides information on Member States’ and EU models of film financing, explores the challenges film financing faces from digital developments and evolving consumer behaviour and analyses possible alternatives to traditional methods of financing and policies to support this.},

note = {Study requested by the CULT Committee, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, Directorate-General for Internal Policies, PE 629.186, European Parliament - January 2019},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2019,

title = {De naburige rechten hebben hun tijd gehad},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AMI_2018_6-3.pdf},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-01-11},

journal = {AMI},

volume = {2018},

number = {6},

pages = {243-244},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2018h,

title = {Annotatie bij Geschillencommissie Auteurscontractenrecht 27 juli 2018 (Soof 2)},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_AMI_2018_5-1.pdf},

year  = {2018},

date = {2018-10-30},

journal = {AMI},

volume = {2018},

number = {5},

pages = {213-215},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@misc{Hugenholtz2018g,

title = {The WIPO Broadcasting Treaty. A Conceptual Conundrum},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Keynote_WIPO_Broadcasting_Treaty_2018.pdf},

year  = {2018},

date = {2018-10-24},

abstract = {Keynote at KEI Seminar, Appraising the WIPO Broadcast Treaty and its Implications on Access to Culture, Geneva 3-4 October 2018},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2018f,

title = {De sluipende unificatie van het auteursrecht in Europa},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/BIE_2018_4.pdf},

year  = {2018},

date = {2018-09-21},

journal = {Berichten Industri\"{e}le Eigendom (BIE)},

volume = {2018},

number = {4},

pages = {157-161},

abstract = {Nu de harmonisatie van de auteursrechtwetgeving in Europa bijna is afgerond, wint het idee van daadwerkelijke eenmaking van het auteursrecht in de Europese Unie terrein. In een mededeling over het EU-auteursrechtbeleid heeft de Europese Commissie de invoering van een unitair auteursrecht, dat voor de nationale auteurswetten van de lidstaten in de plaats zou moeten komen, als  ‘langetermijnvisie’ vastgelegd. Desalniettemin lijkt formele unificatie in de vorm van een Auteursrechtverordening nog ver weg. Ondertussen maken de Europese wetgever en het Hof van Justitie stap voor stap een einde aan de territorialiteit van het auteursrecht, waardoor een eengemaakt Europees auteursrecht langzaam maar gestaag toch dichterbij komt. In dit artikel wordt dit proces van sluipende unificatie van het  auteursrecht geschetst. },

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@inbook{Hugenholtz2017,

title = {Against 'Data Property' },

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Against_Data_Property_Kritika_chapter.pdf},

year  = {2018},

date = {2018-09-04},

abstract = {This chapter argues against the idea  of a ‘data producer’s right’. Introducing a property right in machine-generated data would seriously compromise the system of intellectual property law that currently exists in Europe. It would also contravene fundamental freedoms enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights and the EU Charter, distort freedom of competition and freedom of services in the EU, restrict scientific freedoms and generally undercut the promise of big data for European economy and society.},

note = {Chapter in Kritika: Essays on Intellectual Property, Volume 3, ed. Ullrich, Drahos \& Chidini, ISBN: 9781788971157},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Hugenholtz2018d,

title = {Reconstructing Rights: Project Synthesis and Recommendations},

author = {Hugenholtz, P. and Kretschmer, M.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Reconstructing_rights.pdf},

year  = {2018},

date = {2018-05-03},

abstract = {In: Copyright Reconstructed: Rethinking Copyright's Economic Rights in a Time of Highly Dynamic Technological and Economic Change, P.B. Hugenholtz (ed.), Information Law Series, vol. 41, Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer 2018, ISBN: 978-90-411-9103-8.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@book{Hugenholtz2018e,

title = {Copyright Reconstructed: Rethinking Copyright's Economic Rights in a Time of Highly Dynamic Technological and Economic Change},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/ILS_41_flyer.pdf},

isbn = {9789041191038},

year  = {2018},

date = {2018-05-03},

abstract = {The historical evolution of copyright has led to a growing disconnect between the legal definitions of economic rights and the business and technological realities they regulate, eroding copyright’s normative content and distorting the scope of its economic rights. This book, which consolidates the results of a major trans-European research project funded by Microsoft Europe, re-examines the core economic rights protected under EU copyright law, with the aim of bringing these rights more in line with economic and technological realities.},

note = {Information Law Series, vol. 41, Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer 2018, ISBN: 9789041191038, 388 pp.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {book}

}

@inbook{Hugenholtz2018i,

title = {Towards a Universal Rights of Remuneration: Legalizing the Non-commercial Online Use of Works},

author = {Hugenholtz, P. and Quintais, J.},

year  = {2018},

date = {2018-05-03},

note = {Chapter in: Copyright Reconstructed: Rethinking Copyright's Economic Rights in a Time of Highly Dynamic Technological and Economic Change, Hugenholtz, P.B. ed., Information Law Series, no. 41, Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2018. ISBN: 9789041191038},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2018c,

title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 7 juli 2017 (Nanada / Golden Earring)},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_AMI_2018_2.pdf},

year  = {2018},

date = {2018-04-19},

journal = {AMI},

volume = {2018},

number = {2},

pages = {84-86},

abstract = {Buitengerechtelijke ontbinding van muziekuitgave-overeenkomsten wegens tekortschieten door uitgever in exploitatieverplichting: klachtplicht (art. 6:89 BW) geldt niet bij voortdurend tekortschieten. Muziekuitgavecontracten

zijn duurovereenkomsten voor onbepaalde tijd die in beginsel kunnen worden opgezegd, maar daarvoor moeten blijkens art. 25(e) Aw zwaarwegende gronden bestaan.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2018b,

title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 27 maart 2014 (UPC Telekabel Wien / Constantin Film Verleih \& Wega Filmproduktionsgesellschaft) en Hoge Raad 13 november 2015 (Stichting Brein / Ziggo \& XS4ALL)},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2018_110.pdf},

year  = {2018},

date = {2018-04-03},

journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie},

volume = {2018},

number = {13},

pages = {1672-1674},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2018,

title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 13 februari 2014 (Svensson / Retriever Sverige), Hof van Justitie EU 8 september 2016 (GS Media / Sanoma Media Netherlands), Hof van Justitie EU 26 april 2017 (Stichting Brein / J.F. Wullems) en Hof van Justitie EU 14 juni 2017 (Stichting Brein / Ziggo \& XS4ALL Internet)},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2018_114.pdf},

year  = {2018},

date = {2018-03-26},

journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie},

volume = {2018},

number = {13},

pages = {1700-1705},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2017b,

title = {Het einde van de Auteurswet nadert. Veertig jaar harmonisatie van het auteursrecht in Europa (1977-2017)},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AMI_2017_4.pdf},

year  = {2017},

date = {2017-11-23},

journal = {AMI},

volume = {2017},

number = {4},

pages = {177-181},

abstract = {De geschiedenis van de harmonisatie van het auteursrecht valt samen met die van dit tijdschrift. Dit artikel is opgedragen aan J.H. (Jaap) Spoor, die als AMI-redactielid van het eerste uur veertig jaar harmonisatie onverschrokken aan zich voorbij zag gaan. Veertig jaar geleden, in de rubriek ‘internationaal nieuws’ van het allereerste nummer van Auteursrecht, werd bericht dat de Europese Commissie onderzoek had laten doen naar de verschillen tussen de nationale auteurswetten in de Europese Gemeenschap. Het door dr. A. Dietz van het Max Planck Instituut in M\"{u}nchen in het Duits geschreven rapport was sinds kort ‘als xerografische, in twee delen geniete uitgave verkrijgbaar bij de Europese Commissie’. Dit was het begin van de harmonisatie van het auteursrecht in Europa, die in de decennia daarna diepe sporen zou trekken door het Nederlandse recht \textendash sporen die slechts ten dele zichtbaar zijn in de huidige bewoordingen van de Nederlandse Auteurswet.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2016b,

title = {Communication to a New Public? Three reasons why EU copyright law can do without a 'new public'},

author = {Hugenholtz, P. and Velze, S.C. van},

url = {http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40319-016-0512-7?wt_mc=Internal.Event.1.SEM.ArticleAuthorAssignedToIssue},

doi = {10.1007/s40319-016-0512-7},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-11-18},

journal = {IIC (International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law)},

volume = {47},

number = {7},

pages = {797-816},

abstract = {This article critically examines the 'new public' test in EU copyright law, which was developed by the CJEU interpreting the right of communication to the public in cases of retransmission and hyperlinking. As the authors seek to demonstrate, this test is flawed for at least three reasons: historical, conceptual and economic. EU copyright law can do well without a 'new public' test. 



},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2016b,

title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie van de EU 12 november 2015 (HP Belgium / Reprobel)},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2016_370.pdf},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-10-18},

journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie},

number = {39},

pages = {4962-4964},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hugenholtz2016b,

title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie van de EU 3 september 2014 (Deckmyn / Vandersteen c.s.)},

author = {Hugenholtz, P. },

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2016_351.pdf},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-10-06},

journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie},

number = {37},

pages = {4661-4667},

note = {nr. 351.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@inbook{Hugenholtz2016b,

title = {Something Completely Different: Europe's Sui Generis Database Right},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Chapter9_ILS37.pdf

},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-09-15},

pages = {205-222},

chapter = {9},

series = {Information Law Series},

abstract = {This chapter traces the sui generis database right’s historic roots, describes its main features, compares it to copyright, questions its legal nature especially in the light of international intellectual property agreements, and finally examines to what extent the goals of the Directive have been met.},

note = {In: The Internet and the Emerging Importance of New Forms of Intellectual Property, S. Frankel and D. Gervais (eds.), Information Law Series, Vol. 37, Kluwer Law International 2016.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@misc{,

title = {Flexible Copyright. Can EU Author's Right Accommodate Fair Use?},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1821},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-08-02},

abstract = {

	Almost everyone agrees that modern copyright law needs to be flexible in order to accommodate rapid technological change and evolving media uses. In the United States fair use is the flexible instrument of choice. Author\’s right systems in Europe are generally deemed to be less flexible and less tolerant to open-ended limitations and exceptions. But are they really?


	This chapter makes the case that (1) author\’s rights systems can be made as flexible as copyright systems, and (2) that the existing EU legal framework does not preclude the development of flexible norms at the national level.

},

note = {

	In: Copyright Law in an Age of Limitations and Exceptions, R. Okediji (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016, p. 242-258 (forthcoming).

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@book{,

title = {Concise European Copyright Law (second edition)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {https://lrus.wolterskluwer.com/store/products/concise-european-copyright-law-second-prod-9041128794/hardcover-item-1-9041128794},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-07-21},

abstract = {

	The second edition of Concise European Copyright Law was published in Spring 2016. Concise European Copyright Law aims to offer the reader a rapid understanding of all the provisions of copyright law in force in Europe that have been enacted at the European and international levels. This volume takes the form of an article-by-article commentary on the relevant EU directives and international treaties in the field of copyright and neighbouring rights. Editors and authors are prominent specialists (academics and practitioners) in the field of international and European copyright law.

},

note = {

	Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2016, 699 pp.


	ISBN 9789041128799.



	See table of contents here.


	See list of authors here.


	A sample chapter on the EU Database Directive, by Prof. P.B. Hugenholtz, is available here.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {book}

}

@misc{,

title = {Making the Digital Single Market Work for Copyright. Extending the Satellite \& Cable Directive to content services on line},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1819},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-07-15},

abstract = {

	Despite 25 years of copyright harmonization the law of copyright in the EU has remained, essentially, national and territorial. For the world of tangible (physical) goods a similar problem of market fragmentation was solved decades ago by the ECJ establishing a rule of \‘Community exhaustion\’ of the right of distribution. Ever since, goods incorporating intellectual property, such as records, books and trademarked clothing, may circulate freely across the EU after their initial authorized marketing in a Member State. Why not introduce a similar rule for the world of non-physical distribution? We do have an interesting precedent. Satellite broadcasting market suffered from similar copyright problems as the on line content services market today. In 1993 the Sat-Cab Directive solved such problems stating that satellite broadcasting is a relevant act for copyright purposes only in the country of origin of the signal. As a consequence, a license to broadcast audiovisual content by satellite would be needed only in the Member State from where the satellite signal was uplinked. This article examines the legal ramifications of the extension of the country of origin principle to the on line environment.

},

note = {

	In: The Digital Single Market Copyright: Internet and Copyright Law in the European Perspective, Conference proceedings, Milan 4-5 November 2015, M. Franzosi, O. Pollicino \& G. Campus (ed.).


	ISBN: 9788854894419.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@inbook{Hugenholtz2016b,

title = {Making the Digital Single Market Work for Copyright. Extending the Satellite \& Cable Directive to content services on line},

author = {Hugenholtz, P. },

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/makingthedigitalsinglemarketworkforcopyright/},

isbn = {9788854894419},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-07-15},

abstract = {Despite 25 years of copyright harmonization the law of copyright in the EU has remained, essentially, national and territorial. For the world of tangible (physical) goods a similar problem of market fragmentation was solved decades ago by the ECJ establishing a rule of ‘Community exhaustion’ of the right of distribution. Ever since, goods incorporating intellectual property, such as records, books and trademarked clothing, may circulate freely across the EU after their initial authorized marketing in a Member State. Why not introduce a similar rule for the world of non-physical distribution? We do have an interesting precedent. Satellite broadcasting market suffered from similar copyright problems as the on line content services market today. In 1993 the Sat-Cab Directive solved such problems stating that satellite broadcasting is a relevant act for copyright purposes only in the country of origin of the signal. As a consequence, a license to broadcast audiovisual content by satellite would be needed only in the Member State from where the satellite signal was uplinked. This article examines the legal ramifications of the extension of the country of origin principle to the on line environment.},

note = {In: The Digital Single Market Copyright: Internet and Copyright Law in the European Perspective, Conference proceedings, Milan 4-5 November 2015, M. Franzosi, O. Pollicino \& G. Campus (ed.).},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@misc{Hugenholtz2016b,

title = {Answer to the EC Consultation on the 'panorama exception'},

author = {Hugenholtz, P. and Benabou, V. and Derclaye E. and Dinwoodie, G. and Dusollier, S. and Geiger, C. and Griffiths, J. and Kretschmer, M. and Metzger, A. and Peukert, A. and Ricolfi, M. and Rognstad, O. and Vivant, M. and Xalabarder, R. and Bently, L.},

url = {http://ivir00.websites.xs4all.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/236.pdf},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-07-15},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@article{,

title = {De rechtspositie van de audiovisuele maker binnen de publieke omroep},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1812},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-07-14},

journal = {Mediaforum},

number = {4},

pages = {110-115.},

abstract = {

	Dit artikel geeft antwoord op de vraag of er niet een taak ligt, of zou moeten liggen, voor de publieke omroep om als onderdeel van zijn publieke en publiek gefinancierde culturele taak te waarborgen dat audiovisuele makers, die rechtstreeks of door tussenkomst van een producent in opdracht van de publieke omroepen bijdragen leveren aan omroepprogramma\'s, redelijk worden beloond.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@techreport{,

title = {Study of fundamental rights limitations for online enforcement through self-regulation},

author = {Hins, A. and Hugenholtz, P. and McGonagle, T. and van Daalen, O. and van Hoboken, J. and Angelopoulos, C. and Brody, A. and Margoni, T.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/study_fundamental_rights_limitations.pdf},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-06-16},

note = {Study supported by the Open Society Foundations, 96 pp.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}

@misc{Hugenholtz2016,

title = {Answer to the EC Consultation on the role of publishers in the copyright value chain},

author = {Hugenholtz, P. and Benabou, V. and Derclaye E. and Dinwoodie, G. and Dusollier, S. and Geiger, C. and Griffiths, J. and Kretschmer, M. and Metzger, A. and Peukert, A. and Ricolfi, M. and Rognstad, O. and Vivant, M. and Xalabarder, R. and Bently, L.},

url = {http://ivir00.websites.xs4all.nl/wp-content/uploads/2000/05/235-1-1.pdf},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-06-15},

publisher = {European Copyright Society},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 7 maart 2014 (Staat der Nederlanden / NORMA e.a.), Hof van Justitie van de EU 10 april 2014 (ACI Adam e.a. / Stichting de Thuiskopie en Stichting Onderhandelingen Thuiskopie vergoeding), Hof van Justitie van de EU 5 maart 2015 (Copydan Br{a}ndkopi / Nokia Danmark)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1776},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-05-19},

journal = {NJ},

number = {16/17},

pages = {2384-2388.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@online{Hugenholtz2016b,

title = {Say Nay to the Neighbouring Right!},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {http://kluwercopyrightblog.com/2016/04/14/say-nay-to-the-neighbouring-right/},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-04-14},

organization = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},

note = {Kluwer Copyright Blog, 14 April 2016},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {online}

}

@misc{,

title = {Towards Author's Paradise: The new Dutch Act on Authors' Contracts},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1729.pdf},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-02-25},

note = {

	In: Liber Amicorum Jan Ros\'{e}n, G. Karnell, A. Kur, P-J. Nordell, J. Axhamn, S. Carlsson (ed.), eddy.se ab, Visby 2016, p. 397- 407.


	ISBN: 9789185333660.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{Hugenholtz2015,

title = {Response to the European Commission’s Public Consultation on the Review of the EU Satellite and Cable Directive},

author = {Hugenholtz, P. and Benabou, V. and Derclaye E. and Dinwoodie, G. and Dusollier, S. and Geiger, C. and Griffiths, J. and Kretschmer, M. and Metzger, A. and Peukert, A. and Ricolfi, M. and Rognstad, O. and Vivant, M. and Xalabarder, R. and Bently, L.},

url = {http://ivir00.websites.xs4all.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/237.pdf},

year  = {2015},

date = {2015-11-15},

publisher = {European Copyright Society},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@techreport{,

title = {Extending the SatCab Model to the Internet},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1822},

year  = {2015},

date = {2015-10-26},

note = {

	Study commissioned by BEUC.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 28 maart 2014 (Norma / NLKabel)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1641.pdf},

year  = {2015},

date = {2015-10-20},

journal = {NJ},

number = {42},

pages = {4822-4825.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@techreport{,

title = {De Rechtspositie van de Audiovisuele Maker binnen de Publieke Omroep},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1628.pdf},

year  = {2015},

date = {2015-09-22},

note = {

	Onderzoek in opdracht van de Raad voor Cultuur, Amsterdam, juli 2015.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}

@article{,

title = {Op weg naar een wettelijk stelsel van extended collective licensing voor massadigitalisering?},

author = {S.J.  van Gompel and P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1623.pdf},

year  = {2015},

date = {2015-09-15},

journal = {AMI},

number = {4},

pages = {93-102.},

abstract = {

	De \'extended collective license (ECL) - ofwel de \'verruimde\' collectieve licentieovereenkomst - staat in Nederland en elders ter wereld al enkele jaren sterk in de belangstelling, met name als wettelijk instrument om de rights clearance voor massadigitaliseringsprojecten van erfgoedinstellingen te vergemakkelijken. Naar aanleiding van een gezamenlijke brief van de Nederlandse erfgoedinstellingen en de Federatie Auteursrechtbelangen heeft het Ministerie van OCW door het IViR onderzoek laten verrichten naar het ECL-model en daarover een seminar met belanghebbbenden georganiseerd. In de zomer van 2015 wordt een standpuntbepaling van het kabinet inzake ECL verwacht. In dit artikel worden de belangijkste bevindingen van het onderzoek samengevat. Welke voor- en nadelen zou een ECL-regeling bieden ten opzichte van het huidige Nederlandse model van vrijwillige collectieve licenties die zonder ondersteunende wettelijke maatregelen tot stand komen?

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie van de EU 15 januari  2015 (Ryanair / PR Aviation) en Hoge Raad 17 januari 2014 (Ryanair / PR Aviation)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1611.pdf},

year  = {2015},

date = {2015-08-25},

journal = {NJ},

number = {34/35},

pages = {3665-3667.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 14 juni 2013 (Cruijff / Tirion Uitgevers \& De Jong)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1523.pdf},

year  = {2015},

date = {2015-03-24},

journal = {NJ},

number = {13},

pages = {1273-1308.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {De zaak Tuymans: een deontologische kwestie},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1503.pdf},

year  = {2015},

date = {2015-02-24},

note = {

	Korte voordracht gehouden tijdens debatavond over plagiaat in de kunsten, Akademie van Kunsten, Amsterdam, 19 februari 2015.


	Zie ook het journalistieke verslag en de videoregistratie van deze avond.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {presentation}

}

@article{,

title = {Extended collective licensing: panacee voor massadigitalisering?},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz and S.J.  van Gompel and L.  Guibault},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1471.pdf},

year  = {2014},

date = {2014-12-19},

abstract = {

	In dit rechtsvergelijkend onderzoek wordt geanalyseerd welke voor- en nadelen de invoering van een wettelijk stelsel van \emph{extended collective licensing} (\‘verruimde\’ collectieve licentieovereenkomsten) kan hebben om de \emph{rights clearance} van digitaliseringsprojecten van erfgoedinstellingen te vergemakkelijken. Daarbij wordt een vergelijking gemaakt met de situatie waarin collectieve licenties zonder ondersteunende wettelijke maatregelen tot stand komen. De jurisdicties die zijn onderzocht zijn Denemarken, Noorwegen, Duitsland en Nederland.

},

note = {

	Onderzoek in opdracht van het Ministerie van OCW, Amsterdam, 1 september 2014.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@misc{,

title = {Het einde van het omroepbladenmonopolie nadert nog steeds (maar doet er weinig meer toe)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/25_jaar_Mediaforum.pdf},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-12-06},

note = {

	In: 25 jaar Mediaforum. Een vooruitblik door de achteruitkijkspiegel, M.J. Geus e.a (red), Amsterdam: Otto Cramwinckel Uitgever 2013, p. 40-44.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {Doellijntechnologie},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://uitgeverijdewereld.nl/article/doellijntechnologie},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-12-06},

note = {

	In: Het Beste Idee van 2013, J. Baijens (red.), Tilburg: Uitgeverij De Wereld, 2013.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 29 maart 2013 (Broeren / Duijsens)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2013_504.pdf},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-11-21},

journal = {NJ},

number = {46},

pages = {5927-5929},

note = {

	Zie hier volledige uitspraak.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 22 februari 2013 (Stokke / H3 Products), Hoge Raad 12 april 2013 (Stokke / Fikszo) en Hoge Raad 12 april 2013 (Hauck / Stokke)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2013_503.pdf},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-11-21},

journal = {NJ},

number = {46},

pages = {5896-5900.},

note = {

	Annotatie bij:



	Hoge Raad 22 februari 2013 (Stokke / H3 Products), NJ, 2013-46, nr. 501;


	Hoge Raad 12 april 2013 (Stokke / Fikszo), NJ, 2013-46, nr. 502;


	Hoge Raad 12 april 2013 (Hauck / Stokke), NJ 2013-46, nr. 503.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@inbook{Hugenholtz2013,

title = {Is Harmonization a Good Thing? The Case of the Copyright Acquis},

author = {Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Is_harmonization_a_good_thing.pdf},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-11-17},

note = {In: The Europeanization of Intellectual Property Law, OUP 2013, ISBN: 9780199665105},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 7 maart 2013 (ITV Broadcasting Ltd e.a. / TVCatchup Ltd)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2013_444.pdf},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-10-18},

journal = {NJ},

number = {42},

pages = {5083-5089.},

note = {

	Volledige uitspraak hier.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie 1 december 2011 (Koninklijke Philips Electronics / Lucheng Meijing Industrial Company en Nokia Corporation / Her Majesty's Commissioners of Revenue an Customs)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2013_408.pdf},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-10-01},

journal = {NJ},

number = {38/39},

pages = {4605-4617},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 23 november 2012 (Stichting Leenrecht / Vereniging van Openbare Bibliotheken)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2013_381.pdf},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-08-08},

journal = {NJ},

number = {32/33},

pages = {4206-4245},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@article{,

title = {Fair use in Europe},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Communications_ACM.pdf},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-06-13},

journal = {Communications of the ACM},

number = {5},

pages = {26-28},

abstract = {

	Examining the mismatch between copyright law and technology-influence evolving social norms in the European Union.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@techreport{,

title = {Copyright Reform for Growth and Jobs: Modernising the European Copyright Framework},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/LisbonCouncil_policybrief.pdf},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-05-30},

note = {

	Policy brief, Lisbon Council, 2013, 16 p.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 2 mei 2012 (SAS Institute Inc. / World Programming Ltd)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2013_270.pdf},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-05-28},

journal = {NJ},

number = {22},

pages = {3160-3161.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@techreport{,

title = {Digitalisering van audiovisueel erfgoed: Naar een wettelijke publieke taak},

author = {V.E.  Breemen and J.M.  Breemen and P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Publieke_Taak_Beeld_en_Geluid.pdf},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-05-23},

pages = {56},

abstract = {

	Deze studie onderzoekt wat de publieke taak van de Stichting Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid inhoudt, c.q. zou moeten inhouden. In het eerste deel staan de ontstaansgeschiedenis van het instituut en de ontwikkeling van de taken centraal. Dit deel beschrijft de totstandkomingsgeschiedenis van \'{e}\'{e}n nationaal audiovisueel instituut (1.1) en de kernrollen en dagelijkse activiteiten van Beeld en Geluid (1.2). Zoals zal blijken, kan de taakstelling van Beeld en Geluid worden omschreven als meerledig: zowel bedrijfsarchief als cultuurhistorisch archief met een educatieve taak. Vervolgens wordt de digitale praktijk van het instituut nader bekeken (1.3). In het tweede deel van het onderzoek worden de (juridische) status en taakstelling van twee buitenlandse publieke audiovisuele archieven - in Frankrijk en het Verenigd Koninkrijk - geanalyseerd. Op basis van het voorgaande wordt in het derde deel van het onderzoek geconcludeerd dat Beeld en Geluid de facto een publieke taak vervult en worden de contouren van een wettelijke taak geschetst.

},

note = {

	Onderzoek in opdracht van het Nederlands Instituut voor Beeld en Geluid, december 2012.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 9 februari 2012 (Martin Luksan / Petrus van der Let)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2013_196.pdf},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-04-25},

journal = {NJ},

number = {16},

pages = {2255-2258.},

note = {

	Zaak C-277/10.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 15 maart 2012 (Societ\`{a} Consortile Fonografici / Marco del Corso en Phonographic Performance (Ireland) Limited / Ierland)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2013_197_198.pdf},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-04-25},

journal = {NJ},

number = {16},

pages = {2273-2276.},

note = {

	Zaak C-135/10 en C-162/10.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 3 juli 2012 (UsedSoft / Oracle International)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2013_118.pdf},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-03-19},

journal = {NJ},

number = {11},

pages = {1337-1349.},

note = {

	Zaak C-128/11.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {The Wittem Group's European Copyright Code},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/ILS_29_chapter17.pdf},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-03-05},

note = {

	In: Codification of European Copyright Law, T-E. Synodinou (ed.), Information Law Series, vol. 29, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2012, p. 339-354.


	ISBN 9789041141453.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 1 december 2011  (Eva-Maria Painer / Standard VerlagsGmbhH e.a.)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2013_66.pdf},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-03-05},

journal = {NJ},

number = {7},

pages = {761-778.},

note = {

	Zaak C-145/10.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@techreport{,

title = {Online uitlenen van e-books door bibliotheken: Verkenning juridische mogelijkheden en economische effecten},

author = {R.  van der Noll and M.  Brom and J.P.  Poort and J.M.  Breemen and V.E.  Breemen and P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Online_uitlenen_van_e-books.pdf},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-02-28},

abstract = {

	Het uitlenen van e-books door openbare bibliotheken is in een groeiend aantal landen een realiteit. Dit rapport inventariseert deze praktijk en analyseert de juridische mogelijkheden voor en economische gevolgen van e-lending. In het economische deel van deze verkenning wordt onderzocht in welke mate het aanbod van de bibliotheek zal gaan concurreren met verhuur en verkoop van e-books door commerci\ële partijen. Wanneer het aanbod van de bibliotheek aantrekkelijk genoeg wordt vormgegeven, leidt e-lending tot omzetderving bij commerci\ële partijen. De aantrekkelijkheid van het aanbod hangt onder meer af van de prijs, beschikbaarheid en gebruiksmogelijkheden van het digitale boek. E-lending door openbare bibliotheken kan daarnaast positieve effecten op de inkomsten voor marktpartijen hebben. Via de propositie van de bibliotheek kunnen nieuwe groepen consumenten worden bereikt en kunnen lezers interesse ontwikkelen voor de aanschaf van e-books. Meer empirisch onderzoek is nodig om de omvang van deze effecten te bepalen. Het juridische deel van deze verkenning concludeert dat het bestaande Europese kader van richtlijnen op het terrein van het auteursrecht geen ruimte laat voor invoering op nationaal niveau van een wettelijke uitzondering op het auteursrecht teneinde e-lending door openbare bibliotheken - al dan niet tegen vergoeding - toe te staan.

},

note = {

	SEO-rapport, 2012-83, Amsterdam: SEO Economisch Onderzoek / IViR 2012, 80 p.


	ISBN: 9789067339995.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij HR 28 oktober 2011 (Mag Instrument / Edco Eindhoven)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2012_604.pdf},

year  = {2012},

date = {2012-11-08},

journal = {NJ},

number = {45},

pages = {6826-6828.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@book{,

title = {International Copyright. Principles, Law, and Practice},

author = {P.  Goldstein and P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/903.pdf},

year  = {2012},

date = {2012-11-08},

note = {

	3de druk, New York:  Oxford University Press 2012, 616 pp.


	ISBN: 9780199794294.


	 

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {book}

}

@misc{,

title = {The Story of the Tape Recorder and the History of Copyright Levies},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/ILS_25.pdf},

year  = {2012},

date = {2012-11-06},

note = {

	In: Copyright and the Challenge of the New, B. Sherman \& L. Wiseman (eds.), Information Law Series, vol.25, Alphen aan de Rijn: Kluwer International 2012, p. 179-196.


	ISBN: 9789041136695.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 24 november 2011 en Hof van Justitie EU 16 februari 2012 (Scarlet / SABAM en SABAM / Netlog)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2012_479.pdf},

year  = {2012},

date = {2012-09-25},

journal = {NJ},

number = {37/38},

pages = {5395-5397.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {Works of Literature, Science and Art},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/100jrAUTWET.pdf},

year  = {2012},

date = {2012-09-18},

abstract = {

	This chapter traces the development of the Dutch concept of \‘works of literature, science and art\’ from its adoption in the Act of 1912 (section 3.1) and in subsequent amendments (section 3.2), through its interpretation in legal doctrine (section 3.3) to its application by the courts (section 3.4) and the impact thereon of European harmonization (section 3.5).

},

note = {

	In: A Century of Dutch Copyright Law. Auteurswet 1912-2012, P.B. Hugenholtz, A.A. Quaedvlieg, D.J.G. Visser (eds.), Amsterdam: deLex 2012, p. 19-41.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@article{,

title = {Downloaden: Niet verbieden, maar legaliseren},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.mr-online.nl/digimagazine/sept12/magazine.html?page=20},

year  = {2012},

date = {2012-09-18},

journal = {Mr.},

number = {8/9},

pages = {28},

note = {

	Column.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@misc{,

title = {The Dutch case for flexibility},

author = {Hargreaves, I. and Hofheinz, P. and Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Intellectual_Property_and%20Innovation_Lisbon_Council.pdf},

year  = {2012},

date = {2012-09-13},

booktitle = { Intellectual Property and Innovation: A Framework for 21st Century Growth and Jobs},

pages = {53-57},

publisher = {The Lisbon Council},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 1 maart 2012 (Football Dataco / Yahoo! UK)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2012_433.pdf},

year  = {2012},

date = {2012-08-14},

journal = {NJ},

number = {31},

pages = {4928-4937},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@techreport{,

title = {Using Copyright to Promote Access to Public Sector Information: A Comparative Survey,},

author = {Hugenholtz, P. and Jasserand, C.A.},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/WIPO_June_%202012.pdf},

year  = {2012},

date = {2012-06-05},

abstract = {

	This study, which is part of a three-part report on Using Copyright to Enhance Access to Information and Creative Content, examines the role that copyright plays in facilitating access to and reuse of public sector information. It briefly describes the laws, national policies and government practices relating to the reutilization of public sector information that are currently in place, or being developed, in seven WIPO Member States: France, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, Uganda, United Kingdom and the United States.

},

note = {

	Part III of a study commissioned by WIPO on Using Copyright to Promote Access to Information and Creative Content.\<br /\>

	See also http://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=202179

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 4 oktober 2011 (Football Association Premier League / QC Leisure)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2012_164.pdf},

year  = {2012},

date = {2012-04-17},

journal = {NJ},

number = {13},

pages = {1737-1762.},

abstract = {

	Verzoeken om een prejudici\ële beslissing, ingediend door de High Court of Justice (England \& Wales), Chancery Division ,en de High Court of Justice (England \& Wales), Queen\’s Bench Di-vision (Administrative Court) bij beslissingen van 11 en 28 juli 2008. Satellietuitzending van voetbalwedstrijden. Ontvangst van uitzending via satellietdecoderkaarten die in lidstaat rechtmatig in verkeer zijn gebracht en in andere lidstaat worden gebruikt. Verbod op handel en gebruik in lidstaat. Weergave van uitzendingen in strijd met auteursrecht. Restrictie met mededingingsbeperkende strekking. Bescherming van diensten gebaseerd op voorwaardelijke toegang. Illegale uitrusting. Uitzondering op reproductierecht.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 21 oktober 2010 \& Hof van Justitie EU 16 juni 2011 (Padawan SL / SGAE \& Stichting de Thuiskopie / Opus Supplies Deutschland GmbH e.a.)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2011_47.pdf},

year  = {2012},

date = {2012-02-21},

journal = {NJ},

number = {47},

pages = {5217-5219},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@techreport{,

title = {Fair use in Europe. In search of flexibilities},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Fair%20Use%20Report%20PUB.pdf},

year  = {2011},

date = {2011-11-14},

pages = {30},

address = {Amsterdam},

abstract = {

	This study examines copyright flexibilities from the perspective of EU, international and national law. Why is there a need for flexibilities in copyright law today and to what extent are open norms compatible with the copyright system? Does the EU and international legal framework leave Member States discretion to adopt in their national laws open \‘fair use\’ style limitations and exceptions to copyright? What kinds of flexibility presently exist in national copyright law?

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EG 16 juli 2009 \& Hof van Justitie EU 22 december 2010 (C-5/08 (Infopaq) \& C-393/09 (BSA))},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie%20PBH%20NJ%2029-30%20Nr%20288-289.pdf},

year  = {2011},

date = {2011-08-17},

journal = {NJ},

number = {29/30},

pages = {2890-2893},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@techreport{,

title = {Report of the Netherlands for ALAI 2011 Study Days (Dublin)},

author = {van Eechoud, M. and van Gompel, S. and Guibault, L. and van der Sloot, B. and Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/ALAI_2011_Dublin.pdf},

year  = {2011},

date = {2011-05-19},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}

@techreport{,

title = {Digitalisering van audiovisueel materiaal door erfgoedinstellingen: Modellen voor licenties en vergoedingen},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/110503IVIR_onderzoek_final%203.pdf},

year  = {2011},

date = {2011-05-09},

note = {

	mmv J. Poort.



	Onderzoek in opdracht van Beelden voor de Toekomst/Nederland Kennisland, april 2011



	Zie ook de engelstalige samenvatting.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}

@article{,

title = {De auteursrechtelijke groeipijnen van Google},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Ars_Aequi_2011_feb.pdf},

year  = {2011},

date = {2011-03-08},

journal = {Ars Aequi},

number = {2},

pages = {91-97},

abstract = {

	Dit artikel gaat over Google\'s auteursrechtelijke groeipijnen. Daarbij ligt de nadruk op juridische kwesties in verband met Google\'s meest in het oog springende informatiediensten: de Google zoekmachine en Google Book Search. Het artikel wordt afgesloten met een korte conclusie.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{,

title = {Chronicle of the Netherlands Dutch copyright law, 2001-2010},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/RIDA_2010.pdf},

year  = {2011},

date = {2011-03-08},

number = {226},

pages = {281-349},

abstract = {

	This chronicle will provide an overview of Dutch copyright law as it has developed between 2001 and 2010. First, a brief introduction to the law of copyright in the Netherlands is presented, outlining the general legal framework. Then follows a summary of legislative developments most relevant to copyright, and of forthcoming legislation. Thereafter the pi\`{e}ce de resistance of this chronicle comprises a selection of noteworthy court decisions. The scope of this chronicle is limited to copyright; neighbouring rights and database right will not be treated.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@techreport{,

title = {The European Commission's term extension proposal: fair concern or fruit of industry lobbying?},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/ALAI_Vienna_2010.pdf},

year  = {2011},

date = {2011-03-08},

address = {Wenen},

note = {

	Panel discussie tijdens ALAI Study Days, 10  september 2010.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}

@misc{,

title = {Audiovisual Archives across Borders - Dealing with Territorially Restricted Copyrights},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1652.pdf},

year  = {2011},

date = {2011-01-14},

note = {

	In: Digitisation and Online Exploitation of Broadcasters\' Archives, IRIS Special 2010, Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory, p. 49-54.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {Codes of Conduct and Copyright Enforcement in Cyberspace},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Codes_of_conduct.pdf},

year  = {2010},

date = {2010-12-21},

booktitle = {Copyright Enforcement and the Internet, I.A. Stamatoudi (ed.)},

pages = {303-320},

publisher = {Kluwer Law International},

address = {Alphen aan de Rijn },

series = {Information Law Series},

abstract = {

	This chapter critically examines the rise of codes of conduct that deal with copyright enforcement. Its focus will be on codes binding ISPs and other online intermediaries offering similar services, such as providers of user-generated content (UGC) platforms. While solutions in the United States and elsewhere will occasionally be discussed, its regional focus will be on the European Union. Following the Introduction, section II commences by offering a general typology of self-regulation, including discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of self-regulatory approaches and of the legal nature and normative effect of codes of conduct. Section III describes statutory law on copyright law, liability and enforcement, which serves as background law to self-regulatory copyright enforcement schemes. Section IV describes and critically assesses actual codes of conduct dealing with copyright enforcement. Section V offers conclusions.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Vz. Rb. Amsterdam 22 oktober 2009 (Neij c.s. / Brein)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_AMI_2010_1_brein.pdf},

year  = {2010},

date = {2010-12-21},

journal = {AMI},

number = {1},

pages = {18-24},

abstract = {

	Expoitatie van torrent-site The Pirate Bay die ongeautoriseerde file sharing faciliteert geldt niet als openbaarmaking in auteursrechtelijke zin, maar is wel onrechtmatig omdat The Pirate Bay gelegenheid geeft tot het structureel verwijzen naar auteursrechtelijk beschermd materiaal en daardoor auteursrechtinbreuk bevordert. Oprichters van The Pirate Bay zijn wegens hun betrokkenheid persoonlijk aansprakelijk.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@book{,

title = {International Copyright. Principles, Law, and Practice, Second Edition},

author = {P.  Goldstein and P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1572.pdf},

year  = {2010},

date = {2010-10-23},

abstract = {

	This book divides into two parts. Part One (Chapters 1 through 5) describes the general principles of international copyright and the structure of the main conventions. Following Chapter 2, which sets out the historic traditions of copyright, Chapter 3 describes the substance and structure of the principal international, regional, and bilateral conventions in the field of copyright and neighboring rights. Chapter 4 discusses the principles of territoriality and national treatment that underlie these conventions and examines the often highly complex issues of private international law: jurisdiction (choice of forum) and conflict of laws (choice of law). Chapter 5 concludes Part One with a discussion of so-called "scope" rules in the international conventions and in national law, which determine the points of attachment that allow foreign authors to enjoy local copyright protection.


	Part Two offers a comparative overview of the substantive norms of copyright. Guided by the substantive minima of the main international conventions, this part describes and compares the rules on copyright and neigboring rights found in national laws. Chapter 6 depicts the rules on the subject matter of copyright and neighboring rights, Chapter 7 the rules on authorship and ownership. The terms of protection for copyright and neigboring rights are examined in Chapter 8. Chapter 9 describes the main economic rights protected under copyright and neighboring rights laws, while Chapter 10 focuses on moral rights. Chapter 11 considers limitations and exemptions, and Chapter 12 analyses copyright enforcement remedies and sanctions.

},

note = {

	New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.


	ISBN 9780199737109, 592 pp.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {book}

}

@article{,

title = {European Copyright Code},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AMI_2010_4.pdf},

year  = {2010},

date = {2010-10-14},

journal = {AMI},

number = {4},

pages = {120-126},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 19 juni 2009 (BUMA / Chellomedia)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_AMI_2010_1.pdf},

year  = {2010},

date = {2010-10-14},

journal = {AMI},

number = {1},

pages = {12-18},

abstract = {

	\'Openbaarmaking\' als bedoeld in art. 12 Auteurswet omvat niet het uplinken en downlinken van gecodeerde programmasignalen die niet door het publiek worden ontvangen, maar uitsluitend door kabelkopstations of DTH-platforms die deze signalen decoderen door middel van professionele en niet voor de consument beschikbare decodeerapparatuur teneinde die signalen aan het (geabonneerde) kijkerspubliek door te geven.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@article{,

title = {The Orphan Works Problem: The Copyright Conundrum of Digitizing Large-Scale Audiovisual Archives, and How to Solve it},

author = {S.J.  van Gompel and P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/the_orphan_works_problem.pdf},

year  = {2010},

date = {2010-03-03},

journal = {Popular Communication - The International Journal of Media and Culture},

number = {1},

pages = {61-71},

abstract = {

	This article examines the problem of \'orphan works\' against the background of various projects for mass-digitization of audiovisual content. Orphan works are works for which the copyright owners cannot be identified or located. The fact that a particular work is \'orphaned\' makes it impossible to clear the rights and to legally reutilize the work. This article describes and evaluates six different possible regulatory solutions to the orphan works problem, including extended collective licensing and compulsory licensing. The article concludes that if one wants to make the vast European audiovisual cultural heritage available for future usage, regulatory intervention is indispensable.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij HR 19 december 2003 (Buma/KaZaA), NJ 2009, 548; HR 12 maart 2004 (XS4ALL/Ab.fab), NJ 2009, 549; HR 25 november 2005 (Lycos/Pessers), NJ 2009, 550; Hof van Justitie EG 29 januari 2008, C- (Buma/KaZaA, XS4ALL/Ab.fab, Lycos/Pessers, Promusicae/Telef\'{o}nica)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_48.pdf},

year  = {2010},

date = {2010-02-03},

journal = {NJ},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@article{,

title = {SatCab revisited: The past, present and future of the Satellite and Cable Directive},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/924.pdf},

year  = {2010},

date = {2010-01-29},

number = {8},

pages = {7-19},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EG 9 oktober 2008 (Directmedia / Albert-Ludwigs-Universit\"{a}t)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_AMI_2009_6.pdf},

year  = {2010},

date = {2010-01-27},

journal = {AMI},

number = {6},

pages = {229-233.},

abstract = {

	Onder \'opvraging\' in de zin van art. 7 Databankrichtlijn valt ook het een voor een raadplegen van de gegevens in een databank vanaf een beeldscherm en het na controle overnemen van een substantieel deel van deze gegevens.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@article{,

title = {De Google Book-schikking: de wereldliteratuur gelicentieerd},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/NJB_2009_42.pdf},

year  = {2009},

date = {2009-12-11},

number = {42},

pages = {2754-2758},

abstract = {

	Het Google Book project is de Bibliotheca Alexandrina van deze tijd. Meer dan tien miljoen boeken, waarvan vele van Nederlandse schrijvers, zijn binnen korte tijd digitaal ontsloten en doorzoekbaar gemaakt. Het project roept boeiende vragen op, niet alleen over de toekomst van de bibliotheel en uitgeverij, maar ook over het auteursrecht. In de Verenigde Staten hebben rechthebbenden het met Google op een akkoord gegooid. Wat zijn de auteursrechtelijke gevolgen van het Google Book Settlement voor Nederland?

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Rb. 's-Gravenhage 11 februari 2009 (Wegener / Innoweb (Gaspedaal.nl))},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AMI_2009_5.pdf},

year  = {2009},

date = {2009-12-02},

journal = {AMI},

number = {5},

pages = {206-210},

abstract = {

	Gespecialiseerde (\'dedicated\') zoekmachine maakt inbreuk op sui generis databankenrecht dat rust op databanken die worden doorzocht. Het cumulatief effect van de vele zoekopdrachten die door gedaagde worden uitgevoerd is dat een substantieel deel van de databank van eiseres aan het publiek ter beschikking wordt gesteld.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@article{,

title = {Guy Vandenberghe had gelijk},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/computerrecht_2009_3.pdf},

year  = {2009},

date = {2009-12-02},

journal = {Computerrecht},

number = {3},

pages = { 107},

note = {

	Editorial

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@misc{,

title = {Het Zwarte Schaep. Commercieel Portretrecht in de Periferie van het Recht van de Intellectuele Eigendom},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/het_zwarte_schaep.pdf},

year  = {2009},

date = {2009-11-03},

booktitle = {Commercieel portretrecht. 30 jaar 't Schaep met de 5 pooten, D.J.G. Visser (red.)},

pages = {235-246},

publisher = {deLex},

address = {Amsterdam},

abstract = {

	Het Schaep-arrest is in de Nederlandse IE-wereld destijds goed ontvangen. De erkenning van commerci\ële belangen als \'redelijke belangen\' in de zin van art. 21 Aw sloot aan bij de groeiende behoeften van de entertainmentpraktijk, waarin topsporters, muzikanten en andere bekende Nederlanders (en buitenlanders) hun \'imagerechten\' door middel van licentie- en sponsorcontracten te gelde pleegden te maken. In dit artikel wordt eerst de materi\ële vraag gesteld: valt het commercieel portretrecht naar huidig recht aan te merken als recht van intellectuele eigendom? Vervolgens wordt ingegaan op de meer interessante vraag of het commercieel portretrecht past in het systeem van het recht van de intellectuele eigendom.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@book{,

title = {Harmonizing European Copyright Law: The Challenges of Better Lawmaking},

author = {S.J.  van Gompel and M.M.M.  van Eechoud and L.  Guibault and N.  Helberger and P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/710.pdf},

isbn = {9789041131300},

year  = {2009},

date = {2009-10-13},

publisher = {Kluwer Law International },

address = {Alphen aan den Rijn},

series = {Information Law Series},

abstract = {

	Nobody likes today\’s copyright law. Widespread unauthorized use of copyright material proliferates with impunity, while citizens and users protest that intrusive copyright and related rights law stifle cultural expression. Equipment manufacturers and intermediaries complain about yet more \’security\’ features that complicate their products and services and encumber marketing, while content owners desperately want enforcement to work. And of course it is crucial that whatever regulatory instruments come into play must not age prematurely in Internet time. The European Union faces the daunting challenge of articulating coherent copyright policies that satisfy these contradictory multiple demands. Yet the legal framework must conform to the European Union\’s remit of fostering economic growth in a common market, while respecting the national traditions of its still growing family of Member States. Clearly, an extraordinary balancing act is called for if justice is to be done to all of the private and public interests affected. So how has the European acquis communautaire scored on these issues so far? In this groundbreaking study the Institute for Information Law of the University of Amsterdam brings its extensive academic expertise to bear on this question. The authors scrutinize the present law as laid down in the seven copyright and related rights directives, against the background of the relevant international standards of the Berne Convention, the TRIPs agreement, and the WIPO Internet Treaties. They map out in detail the degree to which certain areas of copyright have been harmonized as they expose the gaps and inconsistencies in the acquis and the urgent unresolved issues that persist. They identify the EU\’s ambitions in relation to its present and future competences (following the Lisbon Reform) to regulate copyright, and to its Better Regulation agenda. Following a comprehensive analysis of almost two decades of regulatory intervention, they move on to the salient current trends that point toward a more coherent and balanced European copyright law.

},

note = {

	Inhoudsopgave;


	Hoofdstuk 1: The European Concern with Copyright and Related Rights;


	Hoofdstuk 9:The Last Frontier: Territoriality;


	Cover

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {book}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Gerechtshof Amsterdam 23 december 2008 (Intersong Basart / Hans van Hemert)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/noot_intersong_basart-hans_van_hemert.pdf},

year  = {2009},

date = {2009-06-23},

journal = {AMI},

number = {2},

pages = {61-64},

abstract = {

	Ontbinding van muziekuitgavecontract wegens wanprestatie muziekuitgever. Het gedurende vele jaren niet of nauwelijks promoten van de werken van de muziekauteur; het niet onderhouden van contact met de auteur en het niet-betalen van vergoedingen zijn aan te merken als wanprestatie en rechtvaardigen ontbinding van de overeenkomst. (art. 6:265 BW).

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Voorzieningenrechter Rechtbank ‘s-Gravenhage 7 september 2006 (Converse / Footwear)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/annotatie_ami_2009_1.pdf},

year  = {2009},

date = {2009-02-10},

journal = {AMI},

number = {1},

pages = {36-38.},

abstract = {

	Inbreuk op auteursrecht op \‘laarsgympen\’. Vraag waar het ontwerp van de schoenen voor het eerst is gepubliceerd in de zin van art. 3 lid 3 Berner Conventie, hetgeen van belang is voor het bepalen van het land van oorsprong.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Gerechtshof ‘s-Gravenhage 28 september 2006 (Standaardcontract Sanoma)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/annotatie_ami_2008_4.pdf},

year  = {2009},

date = {2009-02-10},

journal = {AMI},

number = {4},

pages = {99-103},

abstract = {

	Toetsing van door Sanoma jegens auteurs gehanteerde standaardlicentievoorwaarden aan art. 6:240 BW. Modaliteiten van rechtenverlening vormen geen \‘kernbeding\’ en zijn dus toetsbaar. Duur van exclusiviteit van licentie (18 maanden) onredelijk bezwarend bevonden.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {De Endstra-tapes', annotatie bij Hoge Raad 30 mei 2008 (zonen Endstra / Nieuw Amsterdam)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/annotatie_endstra_tapes.pdf},

year  = {2008},

date = {2008-11-16},

journal = {Ars Aequi},

pages = {819-822},

note = {

	LJN: BC2153

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@article{,

title = {Copyright Codes of Conduct: Pragmatism v. Principle},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/codes_of_conduct_and_copyright_pragmatism_v_principle.pdf},

year  = {2008},

date = {2008-11-01},

journal = {IIC},

number = {6},

pages = {635-637},

edition = {vol. 39},

note = {

	Editorial

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{,

title = {Toegang tot de bron: het auteursrecht en het internet},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AA_jul_aug_2008_Toegang_tot_de_bron_het_auteursrecht_en_het_internet.pdf},

year  = {2008},

date = {2008-09-01},

journal = {Ars Aequi},

number = {07/08},

pages = {581-588},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{,

title = {Never Forever: Why Extending the Term of Protection for Sound Recordings is a Bad Idea},

author = {N.  Helberger and S.J.  van Gompel and P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/EIPR_2008_5.pdf},

year  = {2008},

date = {2008-06-04},

journal = {European Intellectual Property Review},

number = {5},

pages = {174-181},

abstract = {

	This article critically examines the arguments put forward in favour of a term extension of related rights of phonogram producers. The authors conclude that there are no convincing reasons to extend the existing term of protection. The article also explains why the popular argument that a term extension would improve the situation of performers is probably a fallacy.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@misc{,

title = {Openbaarheid van bestuur en auteursrecht, never the twain shall meet?},

author = {N.A.N.M.  van Eijk and P.B.  Hugenholtz and M.M.M.  van Eechoud},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Dommering_bundel_Eechoud.pdf},

year  = {2008},

date = {2008-05-15},

booktitle = {Dommering-bundel: Opstellen over informatierecht aangeboden aan prof. mr. E.J. Dommering},

pages = {89-100},

publisher = {Otto Cramwinckel Uitgever },

address = {Amsterdam},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {Voorwoord en inhoud},

author = {N.A.N.M.  van Eijk and P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Dommering_bundel_Inleiding.pdf},

year  = {2008},

date = {2008-05-15},

booktitle = {Dommering-bundel: Opstellen over informatierecht aangeboden aan prof. mr. E.J. Dommering, N.A.N.M. },

pages = {1-9},

publisher = { Otto Cramwinckel Uitgever},

address = {Amsterdam},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@techreport{,

title = {Conceiving an International Instrument on Limitations and Exceptions to Copyright},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/limitations_exceptions_copyright.pdf},

year  = {2008},

date = {2008-03-25},

abstract = {

	The task of developing a global approach to limitations and exceptions is one of the major challenges facing the international copyright system today. This paper examines policy options and modalities for framing an international instrument on limitations and exceptions to copyright within the treaty obligations of the current international copyright system. We consider this international copyright acquis as our general starting point, and evaluate options for the design of such an instrument, including questions of political sustainability and institutional home.

},

note = {

	Studie ondersteund door het Open Society Institute (OSI), 6 maart 2008.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}

@techreport{,

title = {Geschillenbeslechting en collectief rechtenbeheer: Over tarieven, transparantie en tribunalen in het auteursrecht},

author = {D.J.G.  Visser and A.W.  Hins and P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/WODC_geschillenbeslechting_2007.pdf},

year  = {2008},

date = {2008-02-26},

pages = {80},

abstract = {

	Het collectieve rechtenbeheer in Nederland wordt gekenmerkt door wettelijke monopolies of feitelijke machtsposities met betrekking tot het licenti\ëren van auteursrechtelijk beschermde werken. Door dit gebrek aan marktwerking ontstaan problemen bij de tarifering. In dit onderzoek staat de vraag centraal of deze problemen door de invoering van een bijzondere geschillenregeling en eventuele flankerende maatregelen verlicht kunnen worden. Na een analyse van in Duitsland en Canada bestaande oplossingen \'{e}n van de constitutionele (on)mogelijkheden in Nederland, wordt een oplossing \'op maat\' geformuleerd, die evenredig is met de geschatte omvang van het probleem en aansluit bij de bestaande Nederlandse verhoudingen en de gegroeide praktijk. Deze oplossing bestaat uit een drietal componenten: 1. een transparantieplicht (verplichte openbaarmaking van tarieven); 2. wettelijke normering van tarieven en 3. een geschillenregeling.

},

note = {

	Onderzoek door Universiteit van Amsterdam (IViR) en Universiteit Leiden in opdracht van het WODC (Ministerie van Justitie).

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Rb. 's-Gravenhage 29 november 2006 (Stichting De Thuiskopie / Imation Europe)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/annotatie_AMI_2007_1.pdf},

year  = {2008},

date = {2008-02-20},

journal = {AMI},

number = {1},

pages = { 17-21},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@article{,

title = {Auteursrecht op alles},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/NJB_2008_7.pdf},

year  = {2008},

date = {2008-02-15},

number = {7},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@misc{,

title = {Memento},

author = {D.J.G.  Visser and D.W.F.  Verkade and P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/spoorbundel_memento.pdf},

year  = {2008},

date = {2008-02-06},

booktitle = {Een eigen, oorspronkelijk karakter: opstellen aangeboden aan prof. mr. Jaap H. Spoor},

pages = {395-405.},

publisher = {deLex },

address = {Amsterdam},

abstract = {

	Een kort science-fictionverhaal over de thuiskopieheffing

},

note = {

	Spoor-bundel.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@article{,

title = {No Place Like Home for Making a Copy: Private Copying in European Copyright Law and Consumer Law},

author = {N.  Helberger and P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/BTLJ_2007_3.pdf},

year  = {2008},

date = {2008-01-24},

journal = {Berkeley Technology Law Journal},

volume = {2007},

number = {3},

pages = {1061-1098},

abstract = {

	This article examines the intersection between copyright law and consumer law relating to private copying in Europe. In doing so, we will query the effectiveness of copyright law and consumer law as legal instruments to protect consumers in their dealings with information suppliers. Our goal is to demonstrate that while copyright law in Europe does offer a measure of comfort to consumers, the legal instruments of European consumer law are potentially more effective in achieving the freedom to make private copies that European consumers generally expect.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@techreport{,

title = {Study on the Implementation and Effect in Member States' Laws of Directive 2001/29/EC on the Harmonisation of Certain Aspects of Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society},

author = {G.  Westkamp and T.  Rieber-Mohn and M.M.M.  van Eechoud and L.  Guibault and N.  Helberger and P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Infosoc_report_2007.pdf},

year  = {2007},

date = {2007-03-22},

abstract = {

	This study, commissioned by the European Commission, examines the application of Directive 2001/29/EC in the light of the development of the digital market. Its purpose is to consider how Member States have implemented the Directive into national law and to assist the Commission in evaluating whether the Directive, as currently formulated, remains the appropriate response to the continuing challenges faced by the stakeholders concerned, such as rights holders, commercial users, consumers, educational and scientific users. As set out in specifications of the study set out by the Commission, its aim is "to assess the role that the Directive has played in fostering the digital market for goods and services in the four years since its adoption". The impact of the Directive on the development of digital (chiefly online) business models, therefore, will be the focal point of our enquiry throughout this study.

},

note = {

	Rapport aan de Europese Commissie, DG Interne Markt, februari 2007. Zie ook Part II: Country Reports on the Implementation of Directive 2001/29/EC in the Member States, G. Westkamp, Queen Mary Intellectual Property Research Institute, februari 2007.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}

@techreport{,

title = {The Recasting of Copyright \& Related Rights for the Knowledge Economy},

author = {S.J.  van Gompel and M.M.M.  van Eechoud and L.  Guibault and N.  Helberger and P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/IViR_Recast_Final_Report_2006.pdf},

year  = {2007},

date = {2007-01-10},

abstract = {

	Study carried out by the Institute for Information Law for the European Commission (DG Internal Market). Chapters 1 and 2 describe and examine the existing \'acquis communautaire\' in the field of copyright and related (neighbouring) rights, with special focus on inconsistencies and unclarities. Chapters 3-6 deal with distinct issues that were identified a priori by the European Commission as meriting special attention: possible extension of the term of protection of phonograms (Chapter 3), possible alignment of the term of protection of co-written musical works (Chapter 4), the problems connected to multiple copyright ownership, including the issue of \'orphan works\' (Chapter 5), and copyright awareness among consumers (Chapter 6). Chapter 7 provides an overall assessment of the benefits and drawbacks of the fifteen years of harmonisation of copyright and related rights in the EU and dwells on regulatory alternatives.

},

note = {

	Rapport aan de Europese Commissie, DG Interne Markt, november 2006, 308 p.


	Zie ook de executive summary.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}

@misc{,

title = {Auteursrecht op (de geur van een) parfum, annotatie bij HR 16 juni 2006 (Kecofa / Lanc\^{o}me)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/annotatie_AA_2006_11.pdf},

year  = {2006},

date = {2006-12-06},

journal = {Ars Aequi},

number = {11},

pages = {821-824.},

abstract = {

	Nabootsing van een parfum; vraag of een geur(combinatie) auteursrechtelijke bescherming kan genieten; de omschrijving van \'werk\' in art. 10 van de Auteurswet luidt algemeen en belet niet daaronder een geur(combinatie) te begrijpen; beslissend is of het gaat om een voortbrengsel dat vatbaar is voor menselijke waarneming en of het een eigen, oorspronkelijk karakter heeft; dat het menselijk reukzintuig aan het vermogen tot het onderscheiden van geuren grenzen stelt, doet hieraan niet af, evenmin als de omstandigheid dat niet alle bepalingen en beperkingen in de Auteurswet op \'geurwerken\' kunnen worden toegepast; de geur van een parfum mag niet worden vereenzelvigd met de reukstof(fen) die de geur teweegbrengen.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij HvJEG 6 februari 2003, C-245/00 (SENA/NOS), HR 28 mei 2004 (SENA/NOS) en HR 28 november 2003 (SENA/NKP) (SENA / NOS, SENA / KPN)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/annotatie_nj_374_2006.pdf},

year  = {2006},

date = {2006-09-13},

journal = {NJ},

volume = {3617-3619},

number = {30},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@book{,

title = {European Copyright Law},

author = {Dreier, T. and Hugenholtz, P.},

url = {http://www.kluwerlaw.com/Catalogue/titleinfo.htm?ProdID=9041123849},

year  = {2006},

date = {2006-07-27},

pages = { },

note = {

	Concise IP Series, vol. 2, Kluwer Law International 2006, 476 pp.\<br /\>

	ISBN: 9041123849.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {book}

}

@book{,

title = {The Future of the Public Domain - Identifying the Commons in Information Law},

author = {L.  Guibault and P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/322.pdf},

isbn = {9041124357},

year  = {2006},

date = {2006-06-16},

publisher = {Kluwer Law International },

address = {The Hague},

series = {Information Law Series},

abstract = {

	The presence of a robust public domain is an essential precondition for cultural, social and economic development and for a healthy democratic process. But the public domain is under pressure as a result of the ongoing march towards an information economy.


	This book takes a broad, \'information law\' oriented approach towards the question of preservering the public domain, in which a wide range of interrelated legal questions converge.


	Thirteen contributions from academia worldwide make up the present book, addressing the future of the public domain from a different angle. In addition, all authors were invited to reflect upon the notion and role of the public domain in the context of information law and policy.

},

note = {

	Zie ook hoofdstuk 1: The Future of the Public Domain. An Introduction.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {book}

}

@book{,

title = {Auteursrecht op informatie: Auteursrechtelijke bescherming van feitelijke gegevens en gegevensverzamelingen in Nederland, de Verenigde Staten en West-Duitsland. Een rechtsvergelijkend onderzoek},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://dare.uva.nl/cgi/arno/show.cgi?fid=133212},

year  = {2006},

date = {2006-02-03},

abstract = {

	Het proefschrift \textit{Auteursrecht op informatie} is onlangs opnieuw verschenen bij Amsterdam University Press in de Amsterdam Academic Archive serie. In deze serie worden kwalitatief hoogwaardige wetenschappelijke uitgaven die niet meer leverbaar zijn, opnieuw in de handel gebracht.


	\textit{Auteursrecht op informatie} werd voor het eerst gepubliceerd in 1989, zeven jaar voor de aanvaarding van de Europese Databankrichtlijn en tien jaar voordat in Nederland het \'databankenrecht\' in werking trad. Het boek bewijst dat databanken en andere gegevensverzamelingen ook zonder de kunstgreep van een sui generis recht juridische bescherming kunnen vinden. Nu het databankenrecht weer ter discussie staat, heeft het boek een nieuwe actualiteit gekregen.

},

note = {

	Proefschrift, Amsterdam Academic Archive serie, Amsterdam: AUP, 2005.


	ISBN 9053568492.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {book}

}

@article{,

title = {Een overbodige richtlijn},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/ier_2004_4.pdf},

year  = {2006},

date = {2006-01-17},

journal = {IER},

number = {4},

pages = {247-248},

abstract = {

	Kritisch commentaar op de Europese Handhavingsrichtlijn, die voorziet in harmonisatie van civielrechtelijke rechtsmiddelen en sancties in zaken van IE-inbreuk. De richtlijn gaat verder dan nodig is; zij richt zich niet alleen tegen piraterij, maar ook tegen \'gewone\' (misschien wel bona fide) inbreuk. Verder bestaan ernstige twijfels over de subsidiariteit en proportionaliteit van de richtlijn.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{,

title = {The Implementation of Directive 2001/29/EC in The Netherlands},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/RIDA2005_206.pdf},

year  = {2005},

date = {2005-12-15},

journal = {Revue Internationale du Droit d'Auteur (RIDA)},

number = {206},

pages = {117-147},

abstract = {

	Overview of the transposition of the European Copyright (InfoSoc) Directive into Dutch law. To say that the Dutch legislature has enthusiastically embraced the Directive would be overstating it. In respect of the economic rights harmonized by the Directive, the Dutch lawmaker has acted conservatively, and transposed the norm of the Directive only insofar as amendment of existing national provisions was deemed inevitable. The legislature has been more forthcoming in the area of exceptions. Six new limitations, all rubberstamped by the Directive, have been introduced, while the scope of several others has been expanded.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@misc{,

title = {Copyright without Frontiers: is there a Future for the Satellite and Cable Directive?},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/copyrightwithoutfrontiers.pdf},

year  = {2005},

date = {2005-12-15},

booktitle = { Die Zukunft der Fernsehrichtlinie / The Future of the 'Television without Frontiers' Directive},

pages = { 65-73},

publisher = {Nomos Verlag },

address = {Baden-Baden},

edition = {Band 29},

abstract = {

	Critical evaluation of the European Satellite and Cable Directive, guided by the European Commission\'s review report. What has been the impact of the Directive on the European market for satellite and cable television services? What will the future bring for the Directive in a world where wired and wireless broadband media are rapidly converging?

},

note = {

	Proceedings of the conference organised by the Institute of European Media Law (EMR) in cooperation with the European Academy of Law Trier (ERA), Schriftenreihe des Instituts f\"{u}r Europ\"{a}isches Medienrecht (EMR).

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@article{,

title = {‘Football fixtures, horseraces and spinoffs: the ECJ domesticates the database right’},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/EIPR_2005_3_databaseright.pdf},

year  = {2005},

date = {2005-03-23},

journal = {EIPR},

number = {3},

pages = {113-118},

abstract = {

	On November 9, 2004 the ECJ handed down four important decisions on the interpretation of the sui generis database right of the European Database Directive. In the first place, they hold that investment in \'creating\' data, e.g. by drawing up a list of sporting events, does not count towards \'substantial investment\', thereby denying protection to such \'single-source\' data as football fixtures and horseracing schedules. By making a distinction between \'created\' and \'obtained\' data, the ECJ embraces one of the main arguments underlying the \'spin-off theory\'. In the second place, the ECJ clarifies that in determining infringement the economic value of the appropriated data is irrelevant.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@misc{,

title = {De gevolgen voor het omroepbladenmonopolie, annotatie bij Europese Hof van Justitie 9 november 2004 (British Horseracing/William Hill)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/annotatie_ami_2005_1.pdf},

year  = {2005},

date = {2005-02-18},

journal = {AMI},

number = {1},

pages = {36-37},

abstract = {

	De vier arresten van het Hof van Justitie maken duidelijk dat er geen databankenrecht bestaat op de programmagegevens van de omroep. Bovendien laat de Databankrichtlijn geen ruimte meer voor geschriftenbescherming van databanken; de richtlijn is in Nederland dus verkeerd ge\ïmplementeerd. Conclusie: de programmagegevens behoren niet langer te zijn beschermd.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {De toekomst van het auteursrecht: DRM met een vriendelijk gezicht?},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/toekomstauteursrechtDRM.PDF},

year  = {2005},

date = {2005-02-18},

address = {Amsterdam},

note = {

	Lezing gehouden tijdens symposium De toekomst van het auteursrecht, georganiseerd door XS4ALL, Amsterdam, 15 oktober 2004. Zie ook deze website voor de andere bijdragen aan dit symposium: http://www.auteursrechtsymposium.nl/img/boekje.pdf

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {presentation}

}

@misc{,

title = {Abuse of Database Right. Sole-source information banks under the EU Database Directive.},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/abuseofdatabaseright.pdf},

year  = {2005},

date = {2005-02-18},

booktitle = {Antitrust, patents and copyright: EU and US perspectives, F. L\'{e}v\^{e}que \& H. Shelanski (eds.)},

pages = {203-219},

publisher = {Edward Elgar},

address = {Cheltenham},

note = {

	Paper presented at Conference \'Antitrust, Patent and Copyright\', \'{E}cole des Mines/UC Berkeley, Paris, January 15-16, 2004.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@article{,

title = {Het Europese Databankenrecht. Acht jaar later - en nu?},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/auteurs\&media_2004_5\&6_abda.pdf},

year  = {2005},

date = {2005-02-16},

number = {5/6},

pages = {439-443},

abstract = {

	Acht jaar na de aanvaarding van de Europese Databankrichtlijn zijn de contouren van het nieuwe recht sui generis nog steeds onduidelijk. Kernbegrippen, zoals de definitie van \'databank\' en de eis van \'substanti\ële investering\', worden in de Europese rechtspraak en rechtsleer verschillend geduid. Conclusies over het nuttig effect van de richtlijn zijn vooralsnog niet te trekken.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Rb. Haarlem 3 december 2003 (FC Knudde)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/annotatie_ami_2004_3.pdf},

year  = {2005},

date = {2005-02-16},

journal = {AMI},

number = {3},

pages = {112-113},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@techreport{,

title = {Copyright contract law: towards a statutory regulation?},

author = {L.  Guibault and P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/auteurscontractenrecht.pdf},

year  = {2004},

date = {2004-08-06},

pages = {1-146},

note = {

	Study conducted on commission for the department of Scientific Research and Documentation Centre (WODC) of the Dutch Ministry of Justice,August 2004 (Text in the Dutch language).

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}

@techreport{,

title = {Auteurscontractenrecht: naar een wettelijke regeling?},

author = {L.  Guibault and P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/auteurscontractenrecht.pdf},

year  = {2004},

date = {2004-07-21},

pages = {146},

abstract = {

	Deze studie, die is verricht in opdracht van het WODC (Ministerie van Justitie), strekt ertoe de behoefte aan specifieke wettelijke maatregelen in Nederland te inventariseren. In het onderzoek ligt het accent op de vanuit auteursrechtelijk of nabuurrechtelijk oogpunt meest wezenlijke aspecten van de exploitatieovereenkomst: formele vereisten, de omvang en interpretatie van de rechtenverlening, het recht op vergoeding, derdenwerking van de rechtenverlening en de mogelijkheid van herziening en be\ëindiging van de overeenkomst. Op basis van de bevindingen worden de hoofdlijnen van een mogelijke wettelijke regeling geschetst.

},

note = {

	Onderzoek in opdracht van het WODC (Ministerie van Justitie), augustus 2004.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 19 december 2003 (Buma / KaZaA)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/noot-buma-kazaa-19122003.pdf},

year  = {2004},

date = {2004-02-06},

journal = {AMI},

number = {1},

pages = {9-25},

note = {

	Zie ook: Over KaZaA is nog niets beslist, NRC 22 december 2003.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {Auteursrecht contra informatievrijheid in Europa},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/autcontrainfodemeij.PDF},

year  = {2004},

date = {2004-01-07},

booktitle = {Van ontvanger naar zender, Opstellen aangeboden aan prof.mr. J.M. de Meij,  A.W. Hins \& A.J. Nieuwe},

pages = {157-174},

publisher = {Otto Cramwinckel},

address = {Amsterdam},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij het Scientology-arrest},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/noot-scientology-ami.pdf},

year  = {2003},

date = {2003-12-22},

journal = {AMI},

number = { 6},

pages = {222-223},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@article{,

title = {Is concurrentie tussen rechtenorganisaties wenselijk?},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/ami052003collectiefbeheer.pdf},

year  = {2003},

date = {2003-12-19},

journal = {AMI},

number = {5},

pages = {203-206},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 2 mei 2003 (Breekijzer-arrest)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/noot-breekijzer.pdf},

year  = {2003},

date = {2003-10-15},

journal = {AMI},

number = {5},

pages = {175-178},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@article{,

title = {Het mobiele internet},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/mobieleinternet.pdf},

year  = {2003},

date = {2003-10-09},

journal = {AMI},

number = {5},

pages = {161-168},

abstract = {

	De koppeling van mobiele telecommunicatiediensten met het \'vaste\' internet - kortweg \'het mobiele internet\' - roept boeiende auteursrechtelijke vragen op. Is de doorgifte van pagina\'s afkomstig van het internet aan te merken als openbaarmaking, waarvoor afzonderlijk toestemming vereist is? Is het geschikt maken van webpagina\'s voor mobiel gebruik (\'conversie\') ongeoorloofde verveelvoudiging, of wellicht zelfs in strijd met morele rechten? Hoe zit het met de aansprakelijkheid van aanbieders van mobiele internetdiensten? Een verkennende beschouwing.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@techreport{,

title = {Online Service Provider Liability for Copyright Infringement},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz and K.J.  Koelman},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/wipo99.pdf},

year  = {2003},

date = {2003-08-15},

pages = {1-42},

note = {

	Studie in opdracht van de WIPO, Geneve, december 1999.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hof Leeuwarden 27 november 2002 (Wegener e.a./Hunter Select)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/noot-wegener-hunterselect.pdf},

year  = {2003},

date = {2003-06-17},

journal = {AMI},

number = {2},

pages = {59-63},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{,

title = {Program Schedules, Event Data and Telephone Subscriber Listings under the Database Directive - The ‘Spin-Off’ Doctrine in the Netherlands and elsewhere in Europe},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/spinofffordham.pdf},

year  = {2003},

date = {2003-06-16},

pages = {1-7},

publisher = {Fordham University School of Law},

address = {New York},

abstract = {

	Seven years after the adoption of the EC Database Directive, the contours of the new database right remain difficult to draw, and shrouded in controversy. One of many crucial questions soon to be addressed by the European Court of Justice concerns the \'substantial investment\' test. The Directive requires that such investment be made in the \'obtaining, verification or presentation of the contents\' of the database. Does this mean that the investment must be aimed at producing a database, or can data compilations that are generated as mere \'spin-offs\' of other activities, such as program schedules and event data listings, also benefit from sui generis protection?

},

note = {

	Paper presented at Eleventh Annual Conference on International IP Law \& Policy.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {presentation}

}

@techreport{,

title = {The Future of Levies in a Digital Environment},

author = {Guibault, L. and Hugenholtz, P. and Geffen, S.J. van},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/DRM\&levies-report.pdf},

year  = {2003},

date = {2003-03-24},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 8 februari 2002 (EP Controls / Regulateurs Europa)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/annotatie_ami_2002_2.pdf},

year  = {2002},

date = {2002-09-27},

journal = {AMI},

number = {2},

pages = {129},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@article{,

title = {De spin-off theorie uitgesponnen},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/spin-off.pdf},

year  = {2002},

date = {2002-09-19},

journal = {AMI},

number = {5},

pages = {161-166},

abstract = {

	De \'spin-off theorie\', die leert dat er geen databankenrecht rust op feitenverzamelingen die als bijproduct tot stand komen, is door mythes omgeven. Mythe 1: het zou hier gaan om een uniek Nederlands hersenspinsel. Mythe 2: de Databankrichtlijn biedt voor deze theorie geen enkel aanknopingspunt. Mythe 3: de Hoge Raad zou er onlangs mee hebben afgerekend. In dit artikel wordt de spin-off theorie ontmythologiseerd, van onzuiverheden ontdaan, in een nieuw jasje gestoken en een grote toekomst voorspeld.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@misc{,

title = {Annotatie bij Rb. Maastricht 18 april 2002 (auteursrecht op parfum)},

author = {P.B.  Hugenholtz},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/noot-Lancome-Kecofa.pdf},

year  = {2002},

date = {2002-09-19},

journal = {AMI},

number = {5},

pages = {195},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@techreport{,

title = {The patentability of computer programs},

author = {Hugenholtz, P. and Bakels, R.B.},

url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/softwarepatent.pdf},

year  = {2002},

date = {2002-07-25},

abstract = {

	Dit rapport is het resultaat van een korte-termijn studie in opdracht van het Europees Parlement over de vraag of het wenselijk is om te komen tot wetgeving op Europees niveau op het gebied van software-octrooien.  Het rapport omvat een vergelijkende analyse van het geldend recht, en van de voor- en nadelen van software-octrooien zoals die naar voren komen uit de huidige praktijk in de lidstaten van de EU, de Verenigde Staten en Japan. Behalve aan octrooien op software wordt ook aandacht besteed aan octrooien op het nauw verwante gebied van "business methods".

},

note = {

	Studie in opdracht van het Europees Parlement (april 2002).

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}