Events in October 2024:
18 October IViR Lecture Series: AI and Data Protection, a view from the European Data Protection Supervisor |
24-25 October European Privacy Law Scholars Conference |
IViR Summer Courses 2024:
Events in October 2024:
18 October IViR Lecture Series: AI and Data Protection, a view from the European Data Protection Supervisor |
24-25 October European Privacy Law Scholars Conference |
IViR Summer Courses 2024:
This book examines the implications of information security which plays such an important role in modern digital infrastructure. Information security technologies restrict the (mis)use of this infrastructure, while also constantly being probed by researchers, intelligence agencies and criminals. One can see this cycle of making and breaking everywhere in the digital sphere. An important example… Continue reading New book out: From Encryption to Quantum Computing – The Governance of Information Security and Human Rights
Digital Legal Lab member Mireille van Eechoud, Professor of Information Law at the University of Amsterdam, recently participated in a LERU Talk about what digital sovereignty means for universities, and the role of tech companies. Preserving ‘digital sovereignty’ of universities and researchers is key to a successful digital transformation of the university sector. LERU Talks… Continue reading Interview with Mireille van Eechoud on digital sovereignty
Do you want to become a driving force behind the DSA Observatory?
We are looking for a researcher with a profile in information law to join our team.
encryption, Human rights, Information security
Book{nokey,
title = {From Encryption to Quantum Computing – The Governance of Information Security and Human Rights},
author = {van Daalen, O.},
url = {https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-94-6265-635-2},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-09-10},
keywords = {encryption, Human rights, Information security},
}
Online publication{nokey,
title = {Brave New World: Out-Of-Court Dispute Settlement Bodies and the Struggle to Adjudicate Platforms in Europe},
author = {Ruschemeier, H. and Quintais, J. and Nenadić, I. and De Gregorio, G. and Eder, N.},
url = {https://verfassungsblog.de/ods-dsa-user-rights-content-moderatin-out-of-court-dispute-settlement/},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.59704/46b8611eb2d96a84},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-09-10},
journal = {Verfassungsblog},
}
ai, Copyright
Article{nokey,
title = {Prompts tussen vorm en inhoud: de eerste rechtspraak over generatieve AI en het werk},
author = {Hugenholtz, P.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publications/prompts-tussen-vorm-en-inhoud-de-eerste-rechtspraak-over-generatieve-ai-en-het-werk/auteursrecht2024_3/},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-08-30},
journal = {Auteursrecht},
issue = {3},
abstract = {Kan het gebruik van generatieve AI-systemen een auteursrechtelijk beschermd werk opleveren? Twee jaar na de introductie van Dall-E en ChatGPT begint zich enige jurisprudentie te vormen. Daarbij is de kernvraag of het aansturen van dergelijke systemen door middel van prompts (instructies) voldoende is om de output als ‘werk’
te kwalificeren. Dit artikel gaat, mede aan de hand van de vroegste rechtspraak in de Verenigde Staten, China en Europa, dieper in op deze lastige kwestie.},
keywords = {ai, Copyright},
}
Copyright
Online publication{nokey,
title = {Private copying levies, broadcasters and the principle of equal treatment – C-260/22 Seven.One Entertainment Group v Corint Media},
author = {Szkalej, K.},
url = {https://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2024/07/29/private-copying-levies-broadcasters-and-the-principle-of-equal-treatment-c-260-22-seven-one-entertainment-group-v-corint-media/},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-07-29},
journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},
keywords = {Copyright},
}
AI Act, Content moderation, Copyright, DSA, Generative AI, text and data mining, Transparency
Working paper{nokey,
title = {Generative AI, Copyright and the AI Act},
author = {Quintais, J.},
url = {https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4912701},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-08-01},
abstract = {This paper examines the copyright-relevant rules of the recently published Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act for the EU copyright acquis. The aim of the paper is to provide a critical overview of the relationship between the AI Act and EU copyright law, while highlighting potential gray areas and blind spots for legal interpretation and future policy-making. The paper proceeds as follows. After a short introduction, Section 2 outlines the basic copyright issues of generative AI and the relevant copyright acquis rules that interface with the AI Act. It mentions potential copyright issues with the input or training stage, the model, and outputs. The AI Act rules are mostly relevant for the training of AI models, and the Regulation primarily interfaces with the text and data mining (TDM) exceptions in Articles 3 and 4 of the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive (CDSMD). Section 3 then briefly explains the AI Act’s structure and core definitions as they pertain to copyright law. Section 4 is the heart of the paper. It covers in some detail the interface between the AI Act and EU copyright law, namely: the clarification that TDM is involved in training AI models (4.1); the outline of the key copyright obligations in the AI Act (4.2); the obligation to put in place policies to respect copyright law, especially regarding TDM opt-outs (4.3); the projected extraterritorial effect of such obligations (4.4); the transparency obligations (4.5); how the AI Act envisions compliance with such obligations (4.6); and potential enforcement and remedies (4.7). Section 5 offers some concluding remarks, focusing on the inadequacy of the current regime to address one of its main concerns: the fair remuneration of authors and performers.},
keywords = {AI Act, Content moderation, Copyright, DSA, Generative AI, text and data mining, Transparency},
}