Artikel 18-23 DSM-richtlijn: Exploitatiecontracten external link

AMI, vol. 2020, num: 6, pp: 187-192, 2020

Abstract

De DSM-richtlijn van 17 april 2019 bevat een zestal bepalingen op het gebied van het auteurscontractenrecht. Artikelen 18 tot en met 23 hebben niet alleen betrekking op de ‘billijke vergoeding van auteurs en uitvoerende kunstenaars in exploitatiecontracten’, zoals het opschrift van titel IV, hoofdstuk 3 van de richtlijn belooft, maar ook op transparantie, geschillenbeslechting en het recht op herroeping van verleende rechten. Hoewel de meeste van deze onderwerpen reeds een plaats hebben gevonden in hoofdstuk 1a van de huidige Auteurswet, noopt de richtlijn op een aantal punten tot wetswijziging. Dat geldt in het bijzonder voor de transparantieplicht, die in de huidige wet niet voorkomt. In deze bijdrage, onderdeel van een reeks van AMI-artikelen over de DSM-richtlijn, worden de auteurscontractenrechtelijke bepalingen van de richtlijn en de omzetting ervan besproken.

Auteursrecht, DSM-richtlijn, exploitatiecontracten, frontpage

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Trends and Developments in Artificial Intelligence: Challenges to Copyright external link

Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2020

Artificial intelligence, Auteursrecht, frontpage

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

The freedom of expression perspectives on intellectual property in Europe

Abstract

PhD thesis, CEIPI, Strasbourg.

Europe, Freedom of expression, Intellectual property

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Personal Data Stores: a user-centric privacy utopia? external link

Janssen, H., Cobbe, J. & Singh, J.
Internet Policy Review, 2021

Privacy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Decentralised Data Processing: Personal Data Stores and the GDPR external link

Janssen, H., Cobbe, J., Norval, C. & Singh, J.
International Data Privacy Law, vol. 10, num: 4, pp: 356-384, 2021

Abstract

When it comes to online services, users have limited control over how their personal data is processed. This is partly due to the nature of the business models of those services, where data is typically stored and aggregated in data centres. This has recently led to the development of technologies aiming at leveraging user control over the processing of their personal data. Personal Data Stores (“PDSs”) represent a class of these technologies; PDSs provide users with a device, enabling them to capture, aggregate and manage their personal data. The device provides tools for users to control and monitor access, sharing and computation over data on their device. The motivation for PDSs are described as (i) to assist users with their confidentiality and privacy concerns, and/or (ii) to provide opportunities for users to transact with or otherwise monetise their data. While PDSs potentially might enable some degree of user empowerment, they raise interesting considerations and uncertainties in relation to the responsibilities under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). More specifically, the designations of responsibilities among key parties involved in PDS ecosystems are unclear. Further, the technical architecture of PDSs appears to restrict certain lawful grounds for processing, while technical means to identify certain category data, as proposed by some, may remain theoretical. We explore the considerations, uncertainties, and limitations of PDSs with respect to some key obligations under the GDPR. As PDS technologies continue to develop and proliferate, potentially providing an alternative to centralised approaches to data processing, we identify issues which require consideration by regulators, PDS platform providers and technologists.

GDPR, Privacy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Centering the Law in the Digital State external link

Cobbe, J., Seng Ah Lee, M., Singh, J. & Janssen, H.
Computer, vol. 53, num: 10, pp: 47-58, 2020

Abstract

Driven by the promise of increased efficiencies and cost-savings, the public sector has shown much interest in automated decision-making (ADM) technologies. However, the rule of law and fundamental principles of good government are being lost along the way.

automated decision making

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

An approach to a fundamental rights impact assessment to automated decision-making external link

International Data Privacy Law, vol. 10, num: 1, pp: 76-106, 2020

Abstract

Companies and other private institutions see great and promising profits in the use of automated decision-making (‘ADM’) for commercial-, financial- or efficiency in work processing purposes. Meanwhile, ADM based on a data subjects’ personal data may (severely) impact its fundamental rights and freedoms. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) provides for a regulatory framework that applies whenever a controller considers and deploys ADM onto individuals on the basis of their personal data. In the design stage of the intended ADM, article 35 (3)(a) obliges a controller to apply a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA), part of which is an assessment of ADM’s impact on individual rights and freedoms. Article 22 GDPR determines under what conditions ADM is allowed and endows data subjects with increased protection. Research among companies of various sizes has shown that there is (legal) insecurity about the interpretation of the GDPR (including the provisions relevant to ADM). The first objective of the author is to detect ways forward by offering practical handles to execute a DPIA that includes a slidable assessment of impacts on data subjects’ fundamental rights. This assessment is based on four benchmarks that should help to assess the gravity of potential impacts, i.e. i) to determine the impact on the fundamental right(s) at stake, ii) to establish the context in which the ADM is used, iii) the establishment of who is beneficiary of the use of personal data in the ADM and iv) the establishment who is in control over the data flows in the ADM. From the benchmarks an overall fundamental rights impact assessment about ADM should arise. A second objective is to indicate potential factors and measures that a controller should consider in its risk management after the assessment. The proposed approach should help fostering fair, compliant and trustworthy ADM and contains directions for future research.

automated decision making, Fundamental rights, horizontal relations, impact assessment

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Constitutionele Interpretatie. Een rechtsvergelijkend onderzoek naar de vaststelling van de reikwijdte van het recht op persoonlijkheid external link

pp: 495, 2003

Persoonlijkheidsrechten, Privacy, rechtsvergelijking

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Can scholarly pirate libraries bridge the knowledge access gap? An empirical study on the structural conditions of book piracy in global and European academia external link

Antal, D., Bodó, B. & Puha, Z.
PLoS ONE, vol. 15, num: 12, 2020

Abstract

Library Genesis is one of the oldest and largest illegal scholarly book collections online. Without the authorization of copyright holders, this shadow library hosts and makes more than 2 million scholarly publications, monographs, and textbooks available. This paper analyzes a set of weblogs of one of the Library Genesis mirrors, provided to us by one of the service’s administrators. We reconstruct the social and economic factors that drive the global and European demand for illicit scholarly literature. In particular, we test if lower income regions can compensate for the shortcomings in legal access infrastructures by more intensive use of illicit open resources. We found that while richer regions are the most intensive users of shadow libraries, poorer regions face structural limitations that prevent them from fully capitalizing on freely accessible knowledge. We discuss these findings in the wider context of open access publishing, and point out that open access knowledge, if not met with proper knowledge absorption infrastructures, has limited usefulness in addressing knowledge access and production inequalities.

Auteursrecht, frontpage, Internet, knowledge gap, libraries, piraterij

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Panta rhei: A European Perspective on Ensuring a High-Level of Protection of Digital Human Rights in a World in Which Everything Flows external link

Amsterdam Law School Research Paper No. 2020, num: 38, 2020

Artificial intelligence, data flow, EU law, Human rights, WTO law

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib