Skip to content

IVIR

Bluesky LinkedIn News RSS
  • NL
  • EN
  • News
  • Events
  • People
    • Staff
    • Associated staff
  • Publications
    • Information Law Series
  • Research
    • Projects
    • IViR Lecture Series
    • WEsearch
    • Visiting Scholars
    • Academic Integrity
  • Education
    • Master Information Law
    • Advanced LLM: Technology Governance
    • Summer Courses
    • Research by Master Students Information Law
    • International Media Law, Policy and Practice
    • Thesis prizes
  • About
    • Contact
    • IViR Room
    • Publication lists
    • Vacancies

Keyword: metadata

From repository to data space: governing music metadata under EU data law external link

Margoni, T. & King, L.
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, vol. 21, iss. : 6, pp: 392–403, 2026
  • Abstract
  • Links
  • Keywords
  • RIS
  • Bibtex

Abstract

Music metadata is central to remuneration accuracy and cultural visibility in AI- and platform-mediated markets, yet Europe’s landscape remains fragmented due to territorial rights management, divergent identifiers, and proprietary silos. The article reframes the resulting issues — unmatched royalties, inefficient licensing and distorted discoverability — as problems of governance and institutional design rather than purely technical ones. It evaluates whether a decentralized data space architecture, aligned with the EU’s Common European Data Spaces initiative, offers a viable alternative to repository-based models. Drawing on EU data and digital legislation (notably the Open Data Directive, Data Governance Act, and Data Act) and using the European Health Data Space as a reference point, it identifies key legal mechanisms, including interoperability obligations, constraints on unfair contractual terms, and intermediary governance structures. The analysis highlights persistent tensions between EU data law and regimes such as copyright and trade secrets, and assesses the extent to which the current framework can enable governed interoperability for music metadata, pointing to areas where more targeted, sector-specific intervention may be required.

Links

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpag046
  • https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/article-abstract/21/6/392/8661315

Copyright, metadata, music

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Improving music metadata: towards a central repository of creative industry, online platform and AI data resources external link

Senftleben, M.
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, vol. 21, iss. : 6, pp: 384–391, 2026
  • Abstract
  • Links
  • Keywords
  • RIS
  • Bibtex

Abstract

With the work notification mechanism in Article 17(4)(b) and the opt-out mechanism in Article 4(3) of the 2019 Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, EU copyright legislation seeks to strengthen the position of composers, performers, record labels and music publishers vis-à-vis online platforms and AI developers. From the perspective of copyright data governance, however, these provisions may have unintended side effects. Instead of strengthening the position of artists and music companies, they set in motion metadata streams from the music industry to providers of online platforms and AI developers. Ultimately, these metadata fortify the data hegemony of large technology companies. They may increase the dependence of artists and music companies on big tech platforms and AI systems for the distribution of content. To counterbalance the data hegemony of platforms and AI providers, it is advisable to establish a comprehensive EU music metadata infrastructure: a central, open data repository that bundles Article 17(4)(b) work notifications and Article 4(3) opt-out statements which are enriched with descriptive and rights clearance metadata. Once these work notifications and opt-out declarations are in parallel collected and pooled in a central EU music metadata repository, the resulting accumulation of music data can lead to a promising data reservoir capable of competing with the data collections held by online platforms and AI trainers.

Links

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpag042
  • https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/article/21/6/384/8661412

Artificial intelligence, Copyright, metadata, music

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Music recommender systems and the copyright blind spot: conceptualizing the right to be heard external link

Szkalej, K.
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, vol. 21, iss. : 6, pp: 373–383, 2026
  • Abstract
  • Links
  • Keywords
  • RIS
  • Bibtex

Abstract

Music recommender systems: Copyright law secures the lawful availability of content on platforms, management of rights, or remuneration for use, but it remains indifferent to the allocation of cultural attention. Music recommender systems structure the conditions under which copyright can generate cultural and economic value. Their optimisation logics shaped by metadata quality, engagement metrics, and commercial incentives, influence which works circulate and which remain peripheral. Doctrinal blind spot: This article argues that the resulting condition of being represented but not heard exposes a doctrinal blind spot in the copyright system and engages constitutional concerns rooted in artistic freedom, freedom of expression, and the EU’s commitments to cultural diversity. When music discovery becomes infrastructural rather than incidental, cultural participation can no longer be assessed in terms of consumer access to content or platform availability but must also account for artist audibility. The right to be heard: The article reconstructs the right to cultural participation as a relational and infrastructural right to be heard pointing to the need for norms that prevent systemic exclusion where private infrastructures function as unavoidable gateways to cultural encounter. Drawing inspiration from the prominence requirement in the AVMS Directive, it argues that a prominence-based regulatory approach offers a proportionate response to governing attention in markets where exposure is no longer a by-product of availability but a function of design. By focusing on objectives rather than outputs and by leaving technical implementation to platforms, such an approach preserves the essence of the freedom to conduct a business while acknowledging that entrepreneurial autonomy cannot extend to the systematic foreclosure of cultural audibility.

Links

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpag045
  • https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/article/21/6/373/8661314

Copyright, metadata, music, recommender systems

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Music metadata as a fundamental-rights question, or the EU’s positive obligations to secure cultural visibility and equality online external link

Izyumenko, E.
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, vol. 21, iss. : 6, pp: 362–372, 2026
  • Abstract
  • Links
  • Keywords
  • RIS
  • Bibtex

Abstract

Music metadata—credits, identifiers, language labels, territorial tags and genre descriptors—functions as the operative infrastructure of streaming. It shapes what becomes searchable, recommendable, charted and remunerated. This article argues that metadata is therefore not a neutral technical resource but a constitutional site where structural inequality is produced or mitigated. When metadata is sparse, standardized around dominant markets, or mis-specified, the resulting visibility and remuneration deficits disproportionately affect minority-language repertoires, music from smaller territories, field recordings and traditional archives, and women and non-binary creators. The article situates these ‘structural metadata harms’ within the EU’s fundamental-rights framework, contending that Article 22 CFR (respect for cultural and linguistic diversity), read together with Articles 11 (freedom of expression), 13 (artistic freedom), 17(2) (IP), 21 (non-discrimination) and 23 (gender equality), constrains and guides metadata governance. Drawing on CJEU rights-balancing and ECtHR doctrines of positive obligations and indirect structural discrimination, it develops the claim that EU regulatory and standard-setting choices must secure the practical and effective enjoyment of cultural visibility and equal rights-realization online.

Links

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpag043
  • https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/article/21/6/362/8661383

Copyright, metadata, music

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Music Metadata Minefield: prior initiatives, interoperability and how to let GenAI’s copyright traces transpire external link

Valk, E.G.
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, vol. 21, iss. : 6, pp: 347–353, 2026
  • Abstract
  • Links
  • Keywords
  • RIS
  • Bibtex

Abstract

This paper shows that music industry and EU initiatives at the start of the online era for music consumption between the early 2000s and the early 2010s, aiming for centralized copyright databases, failed in part due to misaligned remuneration systems and economic priorities. Some challenges present since those early years have remained, while new ones have emerged with the advent of music streaming, and more recently also with generative AI (GenAI) music tools and services. Decentralized solutions also still have to grapple with metadata design challenges for attaining music metadata interoperability, generally with regard to domain specificity, granularity and provenance. The transparency obligations in Articles 50 and 53(1)(d) of the AI Act do not provide sufficient practical, enforceable rules that can improve metadata interoperability or copyright attribution for GenAI music in the (European) music industry. The explanations and guidance given in the First Draft Code of Practice in relation to Article 50 or the Explanatory Notice and Template for Article 53 do not sufficiently fill those gaps either.

Links

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpag038
  • https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/article/21/6/347/8661095

Copyright, GenAI, metadata, music

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

The political economy of the open music metadata ecosystem—and the impact of the Spotify hack external link

Bodó, B.
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, vol. 21, iss. : 6, pp: 354–361, 2026
  • Abstract
  • Links
  • Keywords
  • RIS
  • Bibtex

Abstract

This article examines the persistent crisis of music metadata and its implications for discoverability, attribution and remuneration. It distinguishes four key categories of metadata and argues that rights-related metadata is both the most economically consequential and the hardest to produce and maintain, because it encodes complex, jurisdiction-specific and dynamically changing relationships among creators, intermediaries and users. The paper shows how legal theory and tradition, the fragmentation of copyright and licensing and the proliferation of heterogeneous intermediaries have jointly prevented the emergence of comprehensive public or private registries. It reviews three major families of attempted solutions: centralized institutional initiatives (eg CMO-led registries), open peer-produced datasets (eg MusicBrainz, Discogs), and blockchain/smart contract–based projects, and explains why each has, so far, failed to deliver an authoritative, rights-inclusive global repertoire database. The analysis situates these failures within broader industry transformations: the democratization of music production, the financialization of rights, the consolidation of power at a few digital service providers and the dual role of AI as both a tool for metadata generation and a driver of repertoire inflation through generative systems. The paper also discusses the 2025 leak of Spotify’s metadata and audio catalogue via Anna’s Archive, interpreting it as a paradigmatic turning point. The sudden availability of the largest publicly accessible, rights-linked music metadata set in history raises legal, institutional and sustainability questions. The article concludes with recommendations towards a more equitable and efficient music data commons—not shying away from the use of the leaked Spotify dataset.

Links

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpag044
  • https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/article/21/6/354/8659968

Copyright, metadata, music

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Music metadata improvement—copyright, fundamental rights and data law external link

Poort, J. & Senftleben, M.
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, vol. 21, iss. : 6, pp: 345–346, 2026
  • Abstract
  • Links
  • Keywords
  • RIS
  • Bibtex

Abstract

Editorial. This special issue contains six articles that analyse music metadata issues through various, primarily legal lenses. A central question for each of the articles is how EU law can contribute to improving music metadata for Europe, to increase the visibility and availability of the European repertoire for the European music economy in general and to further repertoire from composers and performers from a marginalized or underrepresented background in terms of language, ethnicity or gender.

Links

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpag041
  • https://academic.oup.com/jiplp/article/21/6/345/8659969

Copyright, metadata, music

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Copyright’s critical mess: music metadata external link

Valk, E.G.
Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2025
  • Links
  • Keywords
  • RIS
  • Bibtex

Links

  • https://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2025/03/13/copyrights-critical-mess-music-metadata/

Copyright, metadata, music

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

D5.6 – Policy Brief 1: Music Metadata Mainstreaming and EU Law download

Senftleben, M., Margoni, T., Poort, J., Szkalej, K. & Valk, E.G.
pp: 50, 2024
  • Abstract
  • Links
  • Keywords
  • RIS
  • Bibtex

Abstract

In order to enable composers, performers and the music industry to benefit from licensing opportunities in the field of new technologies, such as AI training, it is important to establish a comprehensive music metadata infrastructure that improves the visibility and accessibility of the European music repertoire in digital and algorithmic environments. Recognizing the need for metadata improvement, various European initiatives aim to increase awareness among artists and rightholders, and to build bridges between existing metadata collections and infrastructures. One central factor in the equation, however, has remained underexplored and underused to this day: despite the prohibition of formalities in the Berne Convention, it is conceivable to employ legal mechanisms, such as the notification of work-related information under Article 17(4)(b) of Directive 2019/790 on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, the opt-out mechanism relating to text and data mining that follows from Article 4(3) of the same Directive, and the EU rules on collective rights management, as well as the broader legal framework applicable to data spaces as vehicles to impose an obligation on rightholders to constantly provide updated music metadata in standardised form. If information stemming from these channels is pooled, the resulting accumulation of EU copyright data could lead to a promising reservoir of music metadata that is capable of enhancing and boosting licensing opportunities.

Links

  • D5.6_Policy-Brief-1_Music-Metadata-Mainstreaming-and-EU-Law

Copyright, metadata, music

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Ensuring the Visibility and Accessibility of European Creative Content on the World Market: The Need for Copyright Data Improvement in the Light of New Technologies external link

Antal, D., Senftleben, M., Margoni, T., Bodó, B., van Gompel, S., Handke, C.W., Kretschmer, M., Poort, J., Quintais, J. & Schwemer, S.
JIPITEC, vol. 13, iss. : 1, pp: 67-86, 2022
  • Abstract
  • Links
  • Keywords
  • RIS
  • Bibtex

Abstract

In the European Strategy for Data, the European Commission highlighted the EU’s ambition to acquire a leading role in the data economy. At the same time, the Commission conceded that the EU would have to increase its pools of quality data available for use and re-use. In the creative industries, this need for enhanced data quality and interoperability is particularly strong. Without data improvement, unprecedented opportunities for monetising the wide variety of EU creative and making this content available for new technologies, such as artificial intelligence training systems, will most probably be lost. The problem has a worldwide dimension. While the US have already taken steps to provide an integrated data space for music as of 1 January 2021, the EU is facing major obstacles not only in the field of music but also in other creative industry sectors. Weighing costs and benefits, there can be little doubt that new data improvement initiatives and sufficient investment in a better copyright data infrastructure should play a central role in EU copyright policy. A trade-off between data harmonisation and interoperability on the one hand, and transparency and accountability of content recommender systems on the other, could pave the way for successful new initiatives.

Links

  • https://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-13-1-2022/5515https://www.ivir.nl/jipitec_2022/

Artificial intelligence, Collective licensing, Content moderation, Copyright, creative industry, cultural diversity, Digital Services Act (DSA), interoperability, market concentration, market failure, metadata, Music Modernization Act, recommender systems, SME, Transparency, trustworthy AI

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Older publications

The Institute for Information Law (IViR) engages in cutting-edge research furthering the development of information law, and provides a forum for critical debate about the needs, interests, rights and freedoms of the information society

Newsletter

If you want to stay in touch, and learn about the workshops, events we organise, the research we do, subscribe to our mailing list!

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Follow us

  • Bluesky
  • LinkedIn

RSS Feeds

  • All
  • Publications
  • News
  • Events
UvA

Visiting address

Institute for Information Law
Roeterseilandcampus, Building A, 5th floor
Nieuwe Achtergracht 166
1018 WV Amsterdam
The Netherlands

Postal address

Institute for Information Law
P.O. Box 15514
1001 NA Amsterdam
The Netherlands

  • News
  • Events
  • Privacy Policy
Back to Top