The Harmonized Law of Streaming in the Eu – A Copyright and Related Rights Perspective download

Copyright Law and Streaming: A Comparative Law Analysis of Lawful and Unlawful Streaming Services, Brill/Nijhoff, 2025, pp: 95-134

Abstract

EU law does not contain a distinct set of rules seeking to regulate various types of streaming services. Instead, the harmonized rules governing streaming services follow from individual pieces of EU legislation – ranging from rules on online broadcasting to a specific liability regime for platforms allowing users to upload and share content – and decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’). The following analysis, first, provides an overview of the exclusive rights that must be taken into account in streaming scenarios. This discussion also addresses the exemption of temporary acts of copying that may cover the reception of streaming content by users (section 2). Rights clearance questions occupy centre stage in sections 3 (general services, such as Netflix) and 4 (platforms for user-generated content (‘UGC’), such as YouTube). Section 5 raises the issue of content filtering obligations in the specific legal regime for on-demand streaming of content uploaded by users. Section 6 takes a closer look at copyright limitations that may become relevant in streaming cases, including private copying rules and the exemption of quotations, parodies and pastiches. Section 7 explains the remarkable extension of the concept of ‘communication to the public’ to the provision of streaming equipment for illegal content and infrastructures for illegal file-sharing. It also examines the legal framework for website blocking. In section 8, the results of the analysis will be summarized.

Copyright

Bibtex

Towards a European Research Freedom Act: A Reform Agenda for Research Exceptions in the EU Copyright Acquis external link

IIC, 2025

Abstract

This article explores the impact of EU copyright law on the use of protected knowledge resources in scientific research contexts. Surveying the current copyright/research interface, it becomes apparent that the existing legal framework fails to offer adequate balancing tools for the reconciliation of divergent interests of copyright holders and researchers. The analysis identifies structural deficiencies, such as fragmented and overly restrictive research exceptions, opaque lawful access provisions, outdated non-commercial use requirements, legal uncertainty arising from the three-step test in the EU copyright acquis, obstacles posed by the protection of paywalls and other technological measures, and exposure to contracts that override statutory research freedoms. Empirical data confirm that access barriers, use restrictions and the absence of harmonised rules for transnational research collaborations impede the work of researchers. Against this background, we advance proposals for legislative reform, in particular the introduction of a mandatory, open-ended research exemption that offers reliable breathing space for scientific research across EU Member States, the clarification of lawful access criteria, a more flexible approach to public-private partnerships, and additional rules that support modern research methods, such as text and data mining.

Copyright, open science, research exceptions, right to research, technological protection measures, text and data mining, three-step test

Bibtex

Do AI models dream of dolphins in lake Balaton? external link

Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2025

ai, Copyright

Bibtex

A new liability paradigm for online platforms in EU copyright law download

Governance of Digital Single Market Actors, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2025, ISBN: 9781839101472

Abstract

This chapter explores the transformative impact of art. 17 of the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive on the liability of online content-sharing platforms and its potential impact on users’ rights and freedoms. The analysis traces the evolution of EU copyright law to delineate the legal framework for primary and secondary liability of such platforms leading up to the introduction of art. 17. It then examines the new regime, explaining how it reflects a departure from prior rules and constitutes a novel liability paradigm tailored for online content-sharing platforms. The chapter contends that this shift, in line with the Digital Services Act's (DSA) “enhanced responsibility” approach, entails important trade-offs. It presents challenges to legal certainty, given the complexity of art. 17 and its potential overlaps with the DSA. Moreover, the legal design of art. 17 and the DSA may lead to privatised algorithmic content moderation, outsourcing fundamental rights balancing to platforms and users, risking users’ freedom of expression. The Court of Justice's ruling in Case C-401/19 Poland v Parliament and Council is discussed as illustrative of this shift, to the extent it affirms art. 17's liability design without sufficiently addressing associated fundamental rights risks.

Copyright, liability, Online platforms

Bibtex

New Book Explores Collective Management of Copyright in the Digital Age external link

Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2025

collective management, Copyright

Bibtex

Copyright Liability and Generative AI: What’s the Way Forward? download

Nordic Intellectual Property Law Review, iss. : 1, pp: 92-115, 2025

Abstract

The intersection of copyright liability and generative AI has become one of the most complex and debated issues in the field of copyright law. AI systems have advanced significantly to allow the creation of fantastic new content but they are also capable of producing outputs that evoke, adapt, or recreate content that is protected by copyright law, sparking several infringement proceedings against AI companies, particularly in the US. With this rapid evolution comes the need to re-examine existing legal frameworks and theories. In this contribution, I would like to focus on liability challenges at the output stage of AI content generation and share some insights from Sweden to finally ponder about possible paths forward.

Copyright, Generative AI, liability

Bibtex

The TDM Opt-Out in the EU – Five Problems, One Solution external link

Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2025

Copyright, text and data mining

Bibtex

EU copyright law roundup – first trimester of 2025 external link

Trapova, A. & Quintais, J.
Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2025

Copyright

Bibtex

Economic Contribution of Copyright Industries in the Netherlands – a study based on the WIPO Guide download

Content, J., Jong, G. de, Poort, J. & Toepoel, I.
2025

Abstract

This study measures the economic contribution of industries for which copyright is relevant using the methodology as defined in the Guide of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). The study, which is being conducted for the third time using this methodology, shows that in 2022, the copyright industries contributed 60 billion euros in added value, accounting for 6.0% of Dutch GDP. Their relative economic impact has therefor remained stable over time: in 2011 copyright industries accounted for 6.0% of GDP and in 2005 their share was 5.9% of GDP. Despite the economic shock caused by the corona pandemic, the relative contribution of copyright-related industries within the economy remained stable, with only minor fluctuations in GDP share and employment between 2019 and 2022.

Copyright, economics, WIPO

Bibtex

Online inbreuken in beeld: Online gebruik van niet gelicentieerd beeld door particulieren, zzp’ers en kleine verenigingen en stichtingen external link

Blaker, N., Poort, J., Berg, N. van den, Toepoel, I. & Joosse, A.
2025

Abstract

Particulieren, zzp’ers, en kleine niet-commerciële initiatieven maken regelmatig inbreuk op het auteursrecht van fotografen door beeld zonder licentie online te plaatsen. Een deel van deze inbreuken gebeurt mogelijk onopzettelijk door een gebrek aan kennis van het auteursrecht. Deze constatering heeft ertoe geleid dat een motie is aangenomen door de Tweede Kamer om te kijken naar de noodzaak van voorlichting om onopzettelijke inbreuken te voorkomen en te zorgen dat fotografen een eerlijke vergoeding krijgen voor het online gebruik van hun beeld.

Copyright

Bibtex