Neighbouring Rights are Obsolete external link

IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2019

Abstract

Neighbouring rights based on technological investment that do not provide for a threshold test and corresponding rule of scope, such as the phonographic right, the broadcaster’s right and Europe’s film producer’s right, are outdated and inherently unbalanced. The new press publisher’s right introduced by the EU DSM Directive is similarly unbalanced.

Copyright, frontpage, minimum threshold, neighbouring right, pelham case, phonographic right, press publisher's right

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Data Brokers in an Open Society external link

Rieke, A., Yu, H., Robinson, D. & van Hoboken, J.
2016

Informatierecht

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Overzicht van de bemoeiingen van het Staatsbedrijf der P.T.T. met den radio-omroep in Nederland van het begin af tot Mei 1940 external link

Enserinck, P.A.
0101

Mediarecht, Omroeprecht, ptt, radio

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Geschiedenis van de radio-wetgeving: Wetsontwerp, gewisselde stukken en beraadslagingen, alsmede maatregelen tot uitvoering external link

Fokker, A.J.
0101

Omroeprecht, radio

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

De vrijheid en de verantwoordelijkheid van de pers: Een onderzoek naar de betekenis van de raad voor de journalistiek in het kader van de informatievrijheid external link

Meij, J.M. de
0618

informatievrijheid, Journalistiek, Mediarecht, Persrecht, raad voor de journalistiek

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Omroepvrijheid & overheidsbemoeienis: een vergelijkende studie naar de Nederlandse, Franse en Europese regels met betrekking tot toegangscriteria en programmavoorschriften voor de omroep external link

Europe, frankrijk, Mediarecht, nederland, omroepvrijheid, overheidsbemoeienis

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Patent Abolition: A Real-Life Historical Case Study external link

van Gompel, S.
American University International Law Review, vol. 34, num: 4, pp: 877-922, 2019

Abstract

Over time, patent abolition has been the subject of fierce academic debate. However, no country in the world has ever abolished patents, except for one. Between 1869 and 1912, the Netherlands officially abandoned patents. This unique case is often mentioned in the literature on patent abolition, but the accounts drawn up so far present an incomplete and somewhat obscure image of the motives behind the decision of the Dutch government to eliminate patents. This paper fills this gap by conducting a full analysis of the various – legal, economic, practical, and political – arguments that have inspired the Dutch to abolish patents. By so doing, it sketches a striking picture of the circumstances that gave rise to the exceptional Dutch case. Translating this to today’s reality, which is so entirely different, it seems unlikely that we will soon witness another case where all the necessary ingredients will so neatly coincide as they did in the Netherlands in the late 1860s. Therefore, another real-life example of a developed country abolishing patents appears far away.

frontpage, Patent law

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Book review of Aleksandra Kuczerawy, Intermediary Liability and Freedom of Expression in the EU external link

Common Market Law Review, vol. 56, num: 4, pp: 1154-1155, 2019

book reviews, intermediary liability, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Annotatie bij EHRM 4 december 2018 (Magyar Jeti Zrt / Hongarije) external link

Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, num: 33/34, pp: 4691-4693, 2019

Abstract

Wanneer is de pers aansprakelijk voor de inhoud van de informatie op een site waarnaar in de berichtgeving een hyperlink is geplaatst.

Annotaties, Art. 10 EVRM, frontpage

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

The Decline of Online Piracy: How Markets – Not Enforcement – Drive Down Copyright Infringement external link

American University International Law Review, vol. 34, num: 4, pp: 807-876, 2019

Abstract

This article deals with the acquisition and consumption of music, films, series, books, and games through the various legal and illegal channels that exist nowadays, in a set of thirteen countries across the globe. The article has four aims. First, it provides an overview of the rules on liability for and enforcement of online copyright infringement in the countries studied. Second, it gives factual information about the state of authorized and unauthorized acquisition and consumption of these types of content. The third aim is to evaluate the underlying mechanisms and the link with enforcement measures and legal supply. Lastly, the article assesses the effect of online piracy on consumption from legal sources. To further these aims, the article combines different sources and empirical methods, including consumer surveys among nearly 35.000 respondents and comparative legal research. Our main conclusion is that online piracy is declining. The key driver for this decline is the increasing availability of affordable legal content, rather than enforcement measures. Where the legal supply of copyright-protected content is affordable, convenient and diverse, consumers are willing to pay for it and abandon piracy. Policymakers should therefore shift their focus from repressive approaches to tackle online infringement towards policies and measures that foster lawful remunerated access to copyright-protected content.

consumer survey, Copyright, enforcement, frontpage, intermediary liability, piracy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib