Publications - Page 57 of 267

Nieuws in de platformeconomie external link

De Hofvijver, vol. 11, num: 118, 2021

Abstract

De media stond de afgelopen weken bol van het nieuws dat Google en Facebook op grond van een nieuwe Australische wet moeten gaan betalen voor het gebruik van ‘news content’. In de EU hebben we al een paar jaar zo’n wet, in de vorm van een richtlijn (2019/790) die inmiddels in de Wet op de naburige rechten is geïmplementeerd. Deze zomer treed de herziene wet in werking en hebben uitgevers van perspublicaties aan het auteursrecht vergelijkbare exclusieve rechten ten aanzien van het online (commercieel) gebruik van hun digitale uitgaven. Net als in Australië gebeurde, ging de totstandkoming van de Europese wet gepaard met groot retorisch geweld van zowel de kant van traditionele media als van platformen. Digitale platforms zouden advertentie-inkomsten stelen van kranten en rijk worden over de rug van traditionele media. Persuitgevers zouden voorstander zijn van een de-facto belasting op hyperlinks, gebrek aan innovatiekracht tonen en miskennen hoezeer sociale media en zoekmachines hun bereik exponentieel vergroten, en dat gratis.

Auteursrecht, frontpage, Mediarecht, pers, Platforms

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - van Eechoud, M.
PY  - 0329
DA  - 2021-03-29
T1  - Nieuws in de platformeconomie
JO  - De Hofvijver
VL  - 11
NV  - 118
UR  - https://www.montesquieu-instituut.nl/id/vlhef5g0pisa/nieuws/nieuws_in_de_platformeconomie
AB  - De media stond de afgelopen weken bol van het nieuws dat Google en Facebook op grond van een nieuwe Australische wet moeten gaan betalen voor het gebruik van ‘news content’. In de EU hebben we al een paar jaar zo’n wet, in de vorm van een richtlijn (2019/790) die inmiddels in de Wet op de naburige rechten is geïmplementeerd. Deze zomer treed de herziene wet in werking en hebben uitgevers van perspublicaties aan het auteursrecht vergelijkbare exclusieve rechten ten aanzien van het online (commercieel) gebruik van hun digitale uitgaven. Net als in Australië gebeurde, ging de totstandkoming van de Europese wet gepaard met groot retorisch geweld van zowel de kant van traditionele media als van platformen. Digitale platforms zouden advertentie-inkomsten stelen van kranten en rijk worden over de rug van traditionele media. Persuitgevers zouden voorstander zijn van een de-facto belasting op hyperlinks, gebrek aan innovatiekracht tonen en miskennen hoezeer sociale media en zoekmachines hun bereik exponentieel vergroten, en dat gratis.
K1  - Auteursrecht
K1  - frontpage
K1  - Mediarecht
K1  - pers
K1  - Platforms
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Article{vanEechoud2021,
	title = {Nieuws in de platformeconomie},
	author = {van Eechoud, M.},
	year = {0329},
	date = {2021-03-29},
	journal = {De Hofvijver},
	volume = {11},
	number = {118},
	abstract = {De media stond de afgelopen weken bol van het nieuws dat Google en Facebook op grond van een nieuwe Australische wet moeten gaan betalen voor het gebruik van ‘news content’. In de EU hebben we al een paar jaar zo’n wet, in de vorm van een richtlijn (2019/790) die inmiddels in de Wet op de naburige rechten is geïmplementeerd. Deze zomer treed de herziene wet in werking en hebben uitgevers van perspublicaties aan het auteursrecht vergelijkbare exclusieve rechten ten aanzien van het online (commercieel) gebruik van hun digitale uitgaven. Net als in Australië gebeurde, ging de totstandkoming van de Europese wet gepaard met groot retorisch geweld van zowel de kant van traditionele media als van platformen. Digitale platforms zouden advertentie-inkomsten stelen van kranten en rijk worden over de rug van traditionele media. Persuitgevers zouden voorstander zijn van een de-facto belasting op hyperlinks, gebrek aan innovatiekracht tonen en miskennen hoezeer sociale media en zoekmachines hun bereik exponentieel vergroten, en dat gratis.},
	keywords = {Auteursrecht, frontpage, Mediarecht, pers, Platforms},
}

Save .bib

Toward a Critique of Algorithmic Violence external link

Bellanova, R., Irion, K., Lindskov Jacobsen, K., Ragazzi, F., Saugmann, R. & Suchman, L.

International Political Sociology, vol. 15, num: 1, pp: 121–150, 2021

Abstract

Questions about how algorithms contribute to (in)security are under discussion across international political sociology. Building upon and adding to these debates, our collective discussion foregrounds questions about algorithmic violence. We argue that it is important to examine how algorithmic systems feed (into) specific forms of violence, and how they justify violent actions or redefine what forms of violence are deemed legitimate. Bringing together different disciplinary and conceptual vantage points, this collective discussion opens a conversation about algorithmic violence focusing both on its specific instances and on the challenges that arise in conceptualizing and studying it. Overall, the discussion converges on three areas of concern—the violence undergirding the creation and feeding of data infrastructures; the translation processes at play in the use of computer/machine vision across diverse security practices; and the institutional governing of algorithmic violence, especially its organization, limitation, and legitimation.

Links

DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olab003

affordences, algorithmic violence, Artificial intelligence, cloud computing, frontpage, governance, harm, interdisciplinary, machine learning

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bellanova, R.
AU  - Irion, K.
AU  - Lindskov Jacobsen, K.
AU  - Ragazzi, F.
AU  - Saugmann, R.
AU  - Suchman, L.
PY  - 0329
DA  - 2021-03-29
T1  - Toward a Critique of Algorithmic Violence
JO  - International Political Sociology
VL  - 15
NV  - 1
SP  - 121–150
DO  - https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olab003
AB  - Questions about how algorithms contribute to (in)security are under discussion across international political sociology. Building upon and adding to these debates, our collective discussion foregrounds questions about algorithmic violence. We argue that it is important to examine how algorithmic systems feed (into) specific forms of violence, and how they justify violent actions or redefine what forms of violence are deemed legitimate. Bringing together different disciplinary and conceptual vantage points, this collective discussion opens a conversation about algorithmic violence focusing both on its specific instances and on the challenges that arise in conceptualizing and studying it. Overall, the discussion converges on three areas of concern—the violence undergirding the creation and feeding of data infrastructures; the translation processes at play in the use of computer/machine vision across diverse security practices; and the institutional governing of algorithmic violence, especially its organization, limitation, and legitimation.
K1  - affordences
K1  - algorithmic violence
K1  - Artificial intelligence
K1  - cloud computing
K1  - frontpage
K1  - governance
K1  - harm
K1  - interdisciplinary
K1  - machine learning
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Article{Bellanova2021,
	title = {Toward a Critique of Algorithmic Violence},
	author = {Bellanova, R. and Irion, K. and Lindskov Jacobsen, K. and Ragazzi, F. and Saugmann, R. and Suchman, L.},
	doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olab003},
	year = {0329},
	date = {2021-03-29},
	journal = {International Political Sociology},
	volume = {15},
	number = {1},
	pages = {121–150},
	abstract = {Questions about how algorithms contribute to (in)security are under discussion across international political sociology. Building upon and adding to these debates, our collective discussion foregrounds questions about algorithmic violence. We argue that it is important to examine how algorithmic systems feed (into) specific forms of violence, and how they justify violent actions or redefine what forms of violence are deemed legitimate. Bringing together different disciplinary and conceptual vantage points, this collective discussion opens a conversation about algorithmic violence focusing both on its specific instances and on the challenges that arise in conceptualizing and studying it. Overall, the discussion converges on three areas of concern—the violence undergirding the creation and feeding of data infrastructures; the translation processes at play in the use of computer/machine vision across diverse security practices; and the institutional governing of algorithmic violence, especially its organization, limitation, and legitimation.},
	keywords = {affordences, algorithmic violence, Artificial intelligence, cloud computing, frontpage, governance, harm, interdisciplinary, machine learning},
}

Save .bib

Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 1 oktober 2019 (nr. 17/01305) external link

Dommering, E.

Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, vol. 2021, num: 5/6, pp: 550-551, 2021

Abstract

Schending geheimhoudingsplicht lid Antilliaanse parlement.

Annotaties, frontpage, geheimhoudingsplicht, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 16 juli 2020 (Data Protection Commissioner / Facebook Ireland & Schrems)(Schrems II) external link

Dommering, E.

Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, vol. 2021, num: 5/6, pp: 455-458, 2021

Abstract

Uitlevering persoonsgegevens Ierland/VS in strijd met de AVG omdat veiligheidsdiensten in VS ongecontroleerd toegang hebben tot serviceproviders die deze persoonsgegevens ontvangen.

Annotaties, AVG, frontpage, gegevensbescherming, Personal data, Privacy, Schrems II, serviceproviders, veiligheidsdiensten

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Formal meeting (oral evidence session): Digital trade and data external link

Irion, K.

2021

Abstract

Oral testimony on the UK House of Commons International Trade Committee. The Committee has launched an inquiry into digital trade and data. Digital trade refers to digitally enabled, or digitally delivered, trade in goods and services. Such trade involves the movement of data. The Committee’s inquiry will explore a range of issues, including: • Digital trade and data provisions in Free Trade Agreements • Concerns around the security and privacy of data • The environmental impact of digital trade • Relevant legal frameworks

frontpage, gegevensbescherming, handel, Privacy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Evaluatie 2020: Wet op de Inlichtingen- en veiligheidsdiensten 2017 external link

Jones-Bos, R.V.M., Bot, Th. P.L., Dommering, E., van den Herik, L.J., Jacobs, B.P.F., Nagtegaal, W. & Zijlstra, S.E. (Evaluatiecommissie Wiv 2017)

2021

evaluatie, frontpage, Telecommunicatierecht, Wet op de inlichtingen- en veiligheidsdiensten (Wiv)

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Annotatie bij EHRM 8 oktober 2019 (Szurovecz / Hongarije) external link

Dommering, E.

Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, vol. 2021, num: 4, pp: 230-231, 2021

Abstract

Deze zaak gaat over de vrijheid van nieuwsgaring. Een journalist kreeg geen toegang tot vreemdelingencentra in Hongarije. Het EHRM achtte dat in de gegeven omstandigheden in strijd met artikel 10 EVRM.

Annotaties, Art. 10 EVRM, frontpage, Mediarecht, Vrijheid van meningsuiting, vrijheid van nieuwsgaring

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

EU Consumer Protection 2.0: Structural Asymmetries in Digital Consumer Markets external link

Helberger, N., Lynskey, O., Micklitz, H.-W., Rott, P., Sax, M. & Strycharz, J.

2021

Consumer law, Data protection, manipulation, unfair commercial practices

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Annotatie bij EHRM 30 januari 2020 (Breyer/ Duitsland) external link

Dommering, E.

Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, num: 51/52, pp: 7926-7929, 2021

Abstract

In deze uit Duitsland afkomstige zaak staat centraal de uitleg die het Bundesverfassungsgericht (hierna: BVerfG) aan de Duitse telecommunicatiewetgeving heeft gegeven met betrekking tot de opslag van persoonlijke communicatiegegevens. Het gaat om het opslaan van persoonsgegevens op Simkaarten. De zaak vertoont daarom verwantschap met de uitspraak van het HvJEU in de Spaanse zaak Ministerio Fiscal (HvJEU 2 oktober 2018, NJ 2020, nr 232 m. nt. E.J. Dommering), die het EHRM ook onder het relevante recht vermeldt.

Annotaties, frontpage, Personal data, telecommunciatierecht

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Personalised pricing: The demise of the fixed price? download

Poort, J. & Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.

pp: 174-189, 2021

Abstract

An online seller or platform is technically able to offer every consumer a different price for the same product, based on information it has about the customers. Such online price discrimination exacerbates concerns regarding the fairness and morality of price discrimination, and the possible need for regulation. In this chapter, we discuss the underlying basis of price discrimination in economic theory, and its popular perception. Our surveys show that consumers are critical and suspicious of online price discrimination. A majority consider it unacceptable and unfair, and are in favour of a ban. When stores apply online price discrimination, most consumers think they should be informed about it. We argue that the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) applies to the most controversial forms of online price discrimination, and not only requires companies to disclose their use of price discrimination, but also requires companies to ask customers for their prior consent. Industry practice, however, does not show any adoption of these two principles.

Links

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108891325.014

algorithms, frontpage, GDPR, gegevensbescherming, Personalisation, Price discrimination, Privacy

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Poort, J.
AU  - Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.
PY  - 2021
DA  - 2021-03-04
T1  - Personalised pricing: The demise of the fixed price?
SP  - 174-189
UR  - https://www.ivir.nl/publications/personalised-pricing-the-demise-of-the-fixed-price/personalised-pricing-the-demise-of-the-fixed-price/
DO  - https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108891325.014
AB  - An online seller or platform is technically able to offer every consumer a different price for the same product, based on information it has about the customers. Such online price discrimination exacerbates concerns regarding the fairness and morality of price discrimination, and the possible need for regulation. In this chapter, we discuss the underlying basis of price discrimination in economic theory, and its popular perception. Our surveys show that consumers are critical and suspicious of online price discrimination. A majority consider it unacceptable and unfair, and are in favour of a ban. When stores apply online price discrimination, most consumers think they should be informed about it. We argue that the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) applies to the most controversial forms of online price discrimination, and not only requires companies to disclose their use of price discrimination, but also requires companies to ask customers for their prior consent. Industry practice, however, does not show any adoption of these two principles.
K1  - algorithms
K1  - frontpage
K1  - GDPR
K1  - gegevensbescherming
K1  - Personalisation
K1  - Price discrimination
K1  - Privacy
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Article{Poort2021,
	title = {Personalised pricing: The demise of the fixed price?},
	author = {Poort, J. and Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108891325.014},
	year = {2021},
	date = {2021-03-04},
	pages = {174-189},
	abstract = {An online seller or platform is technically able to offer every consumer a different price for the same product, based on information it has about the customers. Such online price discrimination exacerbates concerns regarding the fairness and morality of price discrimination, and the possible need for regulation. In this chapter, we discuss the underlying basis of price discrimination in economic theory, and its popular perception. Our surveys show that consumers are critical and suspicious of online price discrimination. A majority consider it unacceptable and unfair, and are in favour of a ban. When stores apply online price discrimination, most consumers think they should be informed about it. We argue that the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) applies to the most controversial forms of online price discrimination, and not only requires companies to disclose their use of price discrimination, but also requires companies to ask customers for their prior consent. Industry practice, however, does not show any adoption of these two principles.},
	keywords = {algorithms, frontpage, GDPR, gegevensbescherming, Personalisation, Price discrimination, Privacy},
}

Save .bib

Top Keywords

Abstract

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

RIS

Bibtex

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

RIS

Bibtex

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex