Access and Reuse of Machine-Generated Data for Scientific Research

Access and Reuse of Machine-Generated Data for Scientific Research external link

Erasmus Law Review, num: 2, pp: 155-165, 2019

Abstract

Data driven innovation holds the potential in transforming current business and knowledge discovery models. For this reason, data sharing has become one of the central points of interest for the European Commission towards the creation of a Digital Single Market. The value of automatically generated data, which are collected by Internet-connected objects (IoT), is increasing: from smart houses to wearables, machine-generated data hold significant potential for growth, learning, and problem solving. Facilitating researchers in order to provide access to these types of data implies not only the articulation of existing legal obstacles and of proposed legal solutions but also the understanding of the incentives that motivate the sharing of the data in question. What are the legal tools that researchers can use to gain access and reuse rights in the context of their research?

Links

frontpage, GDPR, Internet of Things, machine-generated data, Personal data, Privacy, scientific research

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Giannopoulou, A.
PY  - 1220
DA  - 2019-12-20
T1  - Access and Reuse of Machine-Generated Data for Scientific Research
JO  - Erasmus Law Review
NV  - 2
SP  - 155-165
UR  - https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Erasmus_Law_Review_2019.pdf
DO  - https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000136
AB  - Data driven innovation holds the potential in transforming current business and knowledge discovery models. For this reason, data sharing has become one of the central points of interest for the European Commission towards the creation of a Digital Single Market. The value of automatically generated data, which are collected by Internet-connected objects (IoT), is increasing: from smart houses to wearables, machine-generated data hold significant potential for growth, learning, and problem solving. Facilitating researchers in order to provide access to these types of data implies not only the articulation of existing legal obstacles and of proposed legal solutions but also the understanding of the incentives that motivate the sharing of the data in question. What are the legal tools that researchers can use to gain
access and reuse rights in the context of their research?
K1  - frontpage
K1  - GDPR
K1  - Internet of Things
K1  - machine-generated data
K1  - Personal data
K1  - Privacy
K1  - scientific research
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Article{Giannopoulou2019bb,
	title = {Access and Reuse of Machine-Generated Data for Scientific Research},
	author = {Giannopoulou, A.},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000136},
	year = {1220},
	date = {2019-12-20},
	journal = {Erasmus Law Review},
	number = {2},
	pages = {155-165},
	abstract = {Data driven innovation holds the potential in transforming current business and knowledge discovery models. For this reason, data sharing has become one of the central points of interest for the European Commission towards the creation of a Digital Single Market. The value of automatically generated data, which are collected by Internet-connected objects (IoT), is increasing: from smart houses to wearables, machine-generated data hold significant potential for growth, learning, and problem solving. Facilitating researchers in order to provide access to these types of data implies not only the articulation of existing legal obstacles and of proposed legal solutions but also the understanding of the incentives that motivate the sharing of the data in question. What are the legal tools that researchers can use to gain
access and reuse rights in the context of their research?},
	keywords = {frontpage, GDPR, Internet of Things, machine-generated data, Personal data, Privacy, scientific research},
}

Save .bib

Spinoza en het internet: tussen ‘libertas philosophandi’ en het ‘ultimi barbarorum’ external link

Dommering, E.

2019

Abstract

Lezing op Spinozadag 2019

Links

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0H6dF6euE34&feature=youtu.be https://amsterdamsespinozakring.nl/spinozadag/2019

Informatierecht

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Does the doctrine of exhaustion apply to videogames purchased digitally? French court says oui external link

Rucz, M.

Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2019

Links

http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2019/12/12/does-the-doctrine-of-exhaustion-apply-to-videogames-purchased-digitally-french-court-says-oui/

Copyright, exhaustion, France, frontpage

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

European Regulation of Smartphone Ecosystems external link

Fahy, R. & van Hoboken, J.

European Data Protection Law Review (EDPL), vol. 5, num: 4, pp: 476-491, 2019

Abstract

For the first time, two pieces of EU legislation will specifically target smartphone ecosystems in relation to smartphone and mobile software (eg, iOS and Android) privacy, and use and monetisation of data. And yet, both pieces of legislation approach data use and data monetisation from radically contrasting perspectives. The first is the proposed ePrivacy Regulation, which seeks to provide enhanced protection against user data monitoring and tracking in smartphones, and safeguard privacy in electronic communications. On the other hand, the recently enacted Platform-to-Business Regulation 2019, seeks to bring fairness to platform-business user relations (including app stores and app developers), and is crucially built upon the premise that the ability to access and use data, including personal data, can enable important value creation in the online platform economy. This article discusses how these two Regulations will apply to smartphone ecosystems, especially relating to user and device privacy. The article analyses the potential tension points between the two sets of rules, which result from the underlying policy objectives of safeguarding privacy in electronic communications and the functioning of the digital economy in the emerging era of platform governance. The article concludes with a discussion on how to address these issues, at the intersection of privacy and competition in the digital platform economy.

Links

frontpage, governance, Platforms, Privacy, Regulering, smartphones

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Fahy, R.
AU  - van Hoboken, J.
PY  - 1213
DA  - 2019-12-13
T1  - European Regulation of Smartphone Ecosystems
JO  - European Data Protection Law Review (EDPL)
VL  - 5
NV  - 4
SP  - 476-491
UR  - https://edpl.lexxion.eu/article/EDPL/2019/4/6
DO  - https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2019/4/6
AB  - For the first time, two pieces of EU legislation will specifically target smartphone ecosystems in relation to smartphone and mobile software (eg, iOS and Android) privacy, and use and monetisation of data. And yet, both pieces of legislation approach data use and data monetisation from radically contrasting perspectives. The first is the proposed ePrivacy Regulation, which seeks to provide enhanced protection against user data monitoring and tracking in smartphones, and safeguard privacy in electronic communications. On the other hand, the recently enacted Platform-to-Business Regulation 2019, seeks to bring fairness to platform-business user relations (including app stores and app developers), and is crucially built upon the premise that the ability to access and use data, including personal data, can enable important value creation in the online platform economy. This article discusses how these two Regulations will apply to smartphone ecosystems, especially relating to user and device privacy. The article analyses the potential tension points between the two sets of rules, which result from the underlying policy objectives of safeguarding privacy in electronic communications and the functioning of the digital economy in the emerging era of platform governance. The article concludes with a discussion on how to address these issues, at the intersection of privacy and competition in the digital platform economy.
K1  - frontpage
K1  - governance
K1  - Platforms
K1  - Privacy
K1  - Regulering
K1  - smartphones
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Article{Fahy2019eb,
	title = {European Regulation of Smartphone Ecosystems},
	author = {Fahy, R. and van Hoboken, J.},
	doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2019/4/6},
	year = {1213},
	date = {2019-12-13},
	journal = {European Data Protection Law Review (EDPL)},
	volume = {5},
	number = {4},
	pages = {476-491},
	abstract = {For the first time, two pieces of EU legislation will specifically target smartphone ecosystems in relation to smartphone and mobile software (eg, iOS and Android) privacy, and use and monetisation of data. And yet, both pieces of legislation approach data use and data monetisation from radically contrasting perspectives. The first is the proposed ePrivacy Regulation, which seeks to provide enhanced protection against user data monitoring and tracking in smartphones, and safeguard privacy in electronic communications. On the other hand, the recently enacted Platform-to-Business Regulation 2019, seeks to bring fairness to platform-business user relations (including app stores and app developers), and is crucially built upon the premise that the ability to access and use data, including personal data, can enable important value creation in the online platform economy. This article discusses how these two Regulations will apply to smartphone ecosystems, especially relating to user and device privacy. The article analyses the potential tension points between the two sets of rules, which result from the underlying policy objectives of safeguarding privacy in electronic communications and the functioning of the digital economy in the emerging era of platform governance. The article concludes with a discussion on how to address these issues, at the intersection of privacy and competition in the digital platform economy.},
	keywords = {frontpage, governance, Platforms, Privacy, Regulering, smartphones},
}

Save .bib