Publications - Page 101 of 266

Het einde van de Auteurswet nadert. Veertig jaar harmonisatie van het auteursrecht in Europa (1977-2017) external link

AMI, vol. 2017, num: 4, pp: 177-181, 2017

Abstract

De geschiedenis van de harmonisatie van het auteursrecht valt samen met die van dit tijdschrift. Dit artikel is opgedragen aan J.H. (Jaap) Spoor, die als AMI-redactielid van het eerste uur veertig jaar harmonisatie onverschrokken aan zich voorbij zag gaan. Veertig jaar geleden, in de rubriek ‘internationaal nieuws’ van het allereerste nummer van Auteursrecht, werd bericht dat de Europese Commissie onderzoek had laten doen naar de verschillen tussen de nationale auteurswetten in de Europese Gemeenschap. Het door dr. A. Dietz van het Max Planck Instituut in München in het Duits geschreven rapport was sinds kort ‘als xerografische, in twee delen geniete uitgave verkrijgbaar bij de Europese Commissie’. Dit was het begin van de harmonisatie van het auteursrecht in Europa, die in de decennia daarna diepe sporen zou trekken door het Nederlandse recht – sporen die slechts ten dele zichtbaar zijn in de huidige bewoordingen van de Nederlandse Auteurswet.

Auteursrecht, Europe, frontpage, harmonisatie

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Hugenholtz, P.B.
PY  - 1123
DA  - 2017-11-23
T1  - Het einde van de Auteurswet nadert. Veertig jaar harmonisatie van het auteursrecht in Europa (1977-2017)
JO  - AMI
VL  - 2017
NV  - 4
SP  - 177-181
UR  - https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AMI_2017_4.pdf
AB  - De geschiedenis van de harmonisatie van het auteursrecht valt samen met die van dit tijdschrift. Dit artikel is opgedragen aan J.H. (Jaap) Spoor, die als AMI-redactielid van het eerste uur veertig jaar harmonisatie onverschrokken aan zich voorbij zag gaan. Veertig jaar geleden, in de rubriek ‘internationaal nieuws’ van het allereerste nummer van Auteursrecht, werd bericht dat de Europese Commissie onderzoek had laten doen naar de verschillen tussen de nationale auteurswetten in de Europese Gemeenschap. Het door dr. A. Dietz van het Max Planck Instituut in München in het Duits geschreven rapport was sinds kort ‘als xerografische, in twee delen geniete uitgave verkrijgbaar bij de Europese Commissie’. Dit was het begin van de harmonisatie van het auteursrecht in Europa, die in de decennia daarna diepe sporen zou trekken door het Nederlandse recht – sporen die slechts ten dele zichtbaar zijn in de huidige bewoordingen van de Nederlandse Auteurswet.
K1  - Auteursrecht
K1  - Europe
K1  - frontpage
K1  - harmonisatie
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Article{Hugenholtz2017b,
	title = {Het einde van de Auteurswet nadert. Veertig jaar harmonisatie van het auteursrecht in Europa (1977-2017)},
	author = {Hugenholtz, P.B.},
	year = {1123},
	date = {2017-11-23},
	journal = {AMI},
	volume = {2017},
	number = {4},
	pages = {177-181},
	abstract = {De geschiedenis van de harmonisatie van het auteursrecht valt samen met die van dit tijdschrift. Dit artikel is opgedragen aan J.H. (Jaap) Spoor, die als AMI-redactielid van het eerste uur veertig jaar harmonisatie onverschrokken aan zich voorbij zag gaan. Veertig jaar geleden, in de rubriek ‘internationaal nieuws’ van het allereerste nummer van Auteursrecht, werd bericht dat de Europese Commissie onderzoek had laten doen naar de verschillen tussen de nationale auteurswetten in de Europese Gemeenschap. Het door dr. A. Dietz van het Max Planck Instituut in München in het Duits geschreven rapport was sinds kort ‘als xerografische, in twee delen geniete uitgave verkrijgbaar bij de Europese Commissie’. Dit was het begin van de harmonisatie van het auteursrecht in Europa, die in de decennia daarna diepe sporen zou trekken door het Nederlandse recht – sporen die slechts ten dele zichtbaar zijn in de huidige bewoordingen van de Nederlandse Auteurswet.},
	keywords = {Auteursrecht, Europe, frontpage, harmonisatie},
}

Save .bib

Who owns the broadcasting archives? Unravelling copyright ownership of broadcast content external link

Schroff, S.

deLex, 1101, ISBN: 978-90-86920-62-4

Abstract

Archives across the Netherlands are tasked to make their archives accessible online. However, progress has been slow, not least because it is difficult to determine who owns the rights to make works available online. Focusing on the Dutch public service radio and TV broadcasting sectors, this book addresses this challenge. First, it disentangles the nature of broadcasts by providing guidance on which aspects of a TV or radio broadcast can attract protection and who owns these. Secondly, it empirically establishes that the default ownership rules can only provide an incomplete picture of the rights ownership in the public service broadcasting sector: the ownership is more concentrated than copyright and neighbouring rights law suggests. Who owns the broadcasting archives? shows how different legal scenarios can explain this rights concentration and establishes their likely practical influence on industry practice in the public service broadcasting sector across time.

Auteursrecht, broadcasting, Copyright, copyright ownership, quantitative methods

RIS

TY  - BOOK
AU  - S.
AU  - Schroff
PY  - 1101
DA  - 2017-11-01
T1  - Who owns the broadcasting archives? Unravelling copyright ownership of broadcast content
UR  - https://www.ivir.nl/who-owns-the-broadcasting-archives-final-2/
AB  - Archives across the Netherlands are tasked to make their archives accessible online. However, progress has been slow, not least because it is difficult to determine who owns the rights to make works available online. Focusing on the Dutch public service radio and TV broadcasting sectors, this book addresses this challenge. First, it disentangles the nature of broadcasts by providing guidance on which aspects of a TV or radio broadcast can attract protection and who owns these. Secondly, it empirically establishes that the default ownership rules can only provide an incomplete picture of the rights ownership in the public service broadcasting sector: the ownership is more concentrated than copyright and neighbouring rights law suggests.

Who owns the broadcasting archives? shows how different legal scenarios can explain this rights concentration and establishes their likely practical influence on industry practice in the public service broadcasting sector across time.
K1  - Auteursrecht
K1  - broadcasting
K1  - Copyright
K1  - copyright ownership
K1  - quantitative methods
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Book{Schroff2017c,
	title = {Who owns the broadcasting archives? Unravelling copyright ownership of broadcast content},
	author = {S. and Schroff},
	year = {1101},
	date = {2017-11-01},
	abstract = {Archives across the Netherlands are tasked to make their archives accessible online. However, progress has been slow, not least because it is difficult to determine who owns the rights to make works available online. Focusing on the Dutch public service radio and TV broadcasting sectors, this book addresses this challenge. First, it disentangles the nature of broadcasts by providing guidance on which aspects of a TV or radio broadcast can attract protection and who owns these. Secondly, it empirically establishes that the default ownership rules can only provide an incomplete picture of the rights ownership in the public service broadcasting sector: the ownership is more concentrated than copyright and neighbouring rights law suggests.

Who owns the broadcasting archives? shows how different legal scenarios can explain this rights concentration and establishes their likely practical influence on industry practice in the public service broadcasting sector across time.},
	keywords = {Auteursrecht, broadcasting, Copyright, copyright ownership, quantitative methods},
}

Save .bib

Is Harmonization a Good Thing? The Case of the Copyright Acquis external link

Hugenholtz, P.B.

1117

Copyright, copyright acquis, European Union, harmonization, related rights, territoriality, unification

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Who owns the broadcasting archives? Unravelling copyright ownership of broadcast content external link

Schroff, S.

deLex, 1117, ISBN: 9789086920624

Abstract

Archives across the Netherlands are tasked to make their archives accessible online. However, progress has been slow, not least because it is difficult to determine who owns the rights to make works available online. Focusing on the Dutch public service radio and TV broadcasting sectors, this book addresses this challenge. First, it disentangles the nature of broadcasts by providing guidance on which aspects of a TV or radio broadcast can attract protection and who owns these. Secondly, it empirically establishes that the default ownership rules can only provide an incomplete picture of the rights ownership in the public service broadcasting sector: the ownership is more concentrated than copyright and neighbouring rights law suggests. Who owns the broadcasting archives? shows how different legal scenarios can explain this rights concentration and establishes their likely practical influence on industry practice in the public service broadcasting sector across time.

archives, Auteursrecht, broadcasting, frontpage, ownership, the netherlands

RIS

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Schroff, S.
PY  - 1117
DA  - 2017-11-17
T1  - Who owns the broadcasting archives? Unravelling copyright ownership of broadcast content
VL  - 2017
UR  - http://www.delex.nl/shop/boeken/who-owns-the-broadcasting-archives-unravelling-copyright-ownership-of-broadcast-content
AB  - Archives across the Netherlands are tasked to make their archives accessible online. However, progress has been slow, not least because it is difficult to determine who owns the rights to make works available online. Focusing on the Dutch public service radio and TV broadcasting sectors, this book addresses this challenge. First, it disentangles the nature of broadcasts by providing guidance on which aspects of a TV or radio broadcast can attract protection and who owns these. Secondly, it empirically establishes that the default ownership rules can only provide an incomplete picture of the rights ownership in the public service broadcasting sector: the ownership is more concentrated than copyright and neighbouring rights law suggests. Who owns the broadcasting archives? shows how different legal scenarios can explain this rights concentration and establishes their likely practical influence on industry practice in the public service broadcasting sector across time.
K1  - archives
K1  - Auteursrecht
K1  - broadcasting
K1  - frontpage
K1  - ownership
K1  - the netherlands
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Book{Schroff2017c,
	title = {Who owns the broadcasting archives? Unravelling copyright ownership of broadcast content},
	author = {Schroff, S.},
	year = {1117},
	date = {2017-11-17},
	volume = {2017},
	abstract = {Archives across the Netherlands are tasked to make their archives accessible online. However, progress has been slow, not least because it is difficult to determine who owns the rights to make works available online. Focusing on the Dutch public service radio and TV broadcasting sectors, this book addresses this challenge. First, it disentangles the nature of broadcasts by providing guidance on which aspects of a TV or radio broadcast can attract protection and who owns these. Secondly, it empirically establishes that the default ownership rules can only provide an incomplete picture of the rights ownership in the public service broadcasting sector: the ownership is more concentrated than copyright and neighbouring rights law suggests. Who owns the broadcasting archives? shows how different legal scenarios can explain this rights concentration and establishes their likely practical influence on industry practice in the public service broadcasting sector across time.},
	keywords = {archives, Auteursrecht, broadcasting, frontpage, ownership, the netherlands},
}

Save .bib

De Hoge Raad en Mein Kampf: Over een veranderde maar ongewisse koers external link

Dommering, E.

2017

Art. 10 EVRM, frontpage, hoge raad, mein kampf, Strafrecht, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 19 oktober 2016 (Breyer, C-2016/779) external link

Dommering, E.

Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, vol. 2017, num: 392, pp: 6020-6021, 2017

Abstract

Is een 'dynamisch' IP adres een persoonsgegeven? Verzoek om een prejudiciële beslissing ingediend door het Bundesgerichtshof (hoogste federale rechter in burgerlijke en strafzaken, Duitsland) bij beslissing van 28 oktober 2014. Verwerking van persoonsgegevens. Begrip, persoonsgegevens’. Internetprotocoladressen. Bewaring door een aanbieder van onlinemediadiensten. Nationale regeling volgens welke geen rekening kan worden gehouden met het gerechtvaardigde belang van de voor de verwerking verantwoordelijke persoon.

Annotaties, frontpage, ip adressen, Personal data, Privacy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Should Fundamental Rights to Privacy and Data Protection be a Part of the EU’s International Trade "Deals"? external link

Yakovleva, S.

World Trade Review, vol. 2018, pp: 477-508, 2017

Abstract

This article discusses ways in which the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and post-GATS free trade agreements may limit the EU's ability to regulate privacy and personal data protection as fundamental rights. After discussing this issue in two dimensions – the vertical relationship between trade and national and European Union (EU) law, and the horizontal relationship between trade and human rights law – the author concludes that these limits are real and pose serious risks. Inspired by recent developments in safeguarding labour, and environmental standards and sustainable development, the article argues that privacy and personal data protection should be part of, and protected by, international trade deals made by the EU. The EU should negotiate future international trade agreements with the objective of allowing them to reflect the normative foundations of privacy and personal data protection. This article suggests a specific way to achieve this objective.

Links

DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745617000453

Data protection, European Union, frontpage, Fundamental rights, international trade, Privacy

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Yakovleva, S.
PY  - 1109
DA  - 2017-11-09
T1  - Should Fundamental Rights to Privacy and Data Protection be a Part of the EU’s International Trade "Deals"?
JO  - World Trade Review
VL  - 2018
SP  - 477-508
UR  - https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/WTR_2018.pdf
DO  - https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745617000453
AB  - This article discusses ways in which the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and post-GATS free trade agreements may limit the EU\'s ability to regulate privacy and personal data protection as fundamental rights. After discussing this issue in two dimensions – the vertical relationship between trade and national and European Union (EU) law, and the horizontal relationship between trade and human rights law – the author concludes that these limits are real and pose serious risks.
Inspired by recent developments in safeguarding labour, and environmental standards and sustainable development, the article argues that privacy and personal data protection should be part of, and protected by, international trade deals made by the EU. The EU should negotiate future international trade agreements with the objective of allowing them to reflect the normative foundations of privacy and personal data protection. This article suggests a specific way to achieve this objective.
K1  - Data protection
K1  - European Union
K1  - frontpage
K1  - Fundamental rights
K1  - international trade
K1  - Privacy
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Article{Yakovleva2017b,
	title = {Should Fundamental Rights to Privacy and Data Protection be a Part of the EU’s International Trade "Deals"?},
	author = {Yakovleva, S.},
	doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745617000453},
	year = {1109},
	date = {2017-11-09},
	journal = {World Trade Review},
	volume = {2018},
	pages = {477-508},
	abstract = {This article discusses ways in which the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and post-GATS free trade agreements may limit the EU\'s ability to regulate privacy and personal data protection as fundamental rights. After discussing this issue in two dimensions – the vertical relationship between trade and national and European Union (EU) law, and the horizontal relationship between trade and human rights law – the author concludes that these limits are real and pose serious risks.
Inspired by recent developments in safeguarding labour, and environmental standards and sustainable development, the article argues that privacy and personal data protection should be part of, and protected by, international trade deals made by the EU. The EU should negotiate future international trade agreements with the objective of allowing them to reflect the normative foundations of privacy and personal data protection. This article suggests a specific way to achieve this objective.},
	keywords = {Data protection, European Union, frontpage, Fundamental rights, international trade, Privacy},
}

Save .bib

Challenged by news personalisation: five perspectives on the right to receive information external link

Eskens, S., Helberger, N. & Möller, J.

Journal of Media Law, vol. 9, num: 2, pp: 259-284, 2017

Abstract

This research asks what the right to receive information means for personalised news consumers and the obligations this rights imposes on states. We develop a framework to understand the right to receive information, starting from case law of the European Court of Human Rights. On this basis, we identify five perspectives on the right to receive information: political debate, truth finding, social cohesion, avoidance of censorship and self-development. We evaluate how these five perspectives inform a legal and policy analysis of news personalisation.

European Convention on Human Rights, filter bubbles, frontpage, media diversity, Media law, news personalisation, right to receive information

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Eskens, S.
AU  - Helberger, N.
AU  - Möller, J.
PY  - 1107
DA  - 2017-11-07
T1  - Challenged by news personalisation: five perspectives on the right to receive information
JO  - Journal of Media Law
VL  - 9
NV  - 2
SP  - 259-284
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2017.1387353
AB  - This research asks what the right to receive information means for personalised news consumers and the obligations this rights imposes on states. We develop a framework to understand the right to receive information, starting from case law of the European Court of Human Rights. On this basis, we identify five perspectives on the right to receive information: political debate, truth finding, social cohesion, avoidance of censorship and self-development. We evaluate how these five perspectives inform a legal and policy analysis of news personalisation.
K1  - European Convention on Human Rights
K1  - filter bubbles
K1  - frontpage
K1  - media diversity
K1  - Media law
K1  - news personalisation
K1  - right to receive information
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Article{Eskens2017,
	title = {Challenged by news personalisation: five perspectives on the right to receive information},
	author = {Eskens, S. and Helberger, N. and Möller, J.},
	year = {1107},
	date = {2017-11-07},
	journal = {Journal of Media Law},
	volume = {9},
	number = {2},
	pages = {259-284},
	abstract = {This research asks what the right to receive information means for personalised news consumers and the obligations this rights imposes on states. We develop a framework to understand the right to receive information, starting from case law of the European Court of Human Rights. On this basis, we identify five perspectives on the right to receive information: political debate, truth finding, social cohesion, avoidance of censorship and self-development. We evaluate how these five perspectives inform a legal and policy analysis of news personalisation.},
	keywords = {European Convention on Human Rights, filter bubbles, frontpage, media diversity, Media law, news personalisation, right to receive information},
}

Save .bib

Referendum ‘sleepnetwet’ voorbode digitale perikelen Rutte III: D66 zal achterban herhaaldelijk moeten teleurstellen rond digitale dossiers external link

Arnbak, A.

Het Financieele Dagblad, vol. 2017, 2017

frontpage, politiek, Privacy, referendum, sleepnet, Telecommunicatierecht

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Ziekenhuizen en energiebedrijven gaan wellicht boeten voor beveiligingsfouten: Nieuwe IT-wet bedoeld om ‘potentiële maatschappelijke ontwrichting’ te voorkomen external link

Arnbak, A.

Het Financieele Dagblad, vol. 2017, 2017

beveiliging, Cybersecurity, energiebedrijven, it, nederland, Privacy, ransomware, Telecommunicatierecht, toezicht, wetgeving, ziekenhuizen

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Top Keywords

Abstract

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

RIS

Bibtex

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

RIS

Bibtex

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

RIS

Bibtex

RIS

Bibtex

RIS

Bibtex