Publications - Pagina 42 van 269

Final Report Perspectives Authors and Performers download

Poort, J. & Pervaiz, A.

2022

Abstract

This is the final report of work package 3 and focuses on Authors and Performers and their experience with digital and disruptive factors and how they impact them professionally and financially. The report is based on the results derived from a survey that targets artists from diverse creative fields within the European Union (EU). The first part of the report is the methodology section, where we discuss the research design. It discusses in detail the methods used in preparing the survey – from inception to execution. This is followed by an extensive data analysis section that provides descriptive results followed by analysis of the results both empirically and from interviews. The report then ends with a discussion section and conclusions.

Links

Copyright

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Survey Data Perspectives Authors and Performers download

Poort, J. & Pervaiz, A.

2022

Abstract

This deliverable represents the Survey questionnaire developed by Abeer Pervaiz and Joost Poort and the ensuing data set. The survey has been translated into 22 official EU languages and is targeted at artists belonging to a wide range of creative fields (authors, performers, designers, singers, musicians, dancers and more) within the EU. The survey has been distributed through different social media platforms such as Instagram, Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn, various social groups, websites and also via networking. This document gives an overview of the participant data that has been collected till 16 February 2022. The data provides both descriptive and visual information. Descriptive data concerning the response will be updated once the survey is closed. This document and the data set together form deliverable D3.2. Following the descriptive participant data is the survey questionnaire. Each question statement represents a labeled value that is shown in brackets. The question statements have also been denoted with a variable value.

Links

RIS

TY  - GEN
AU  - Poort, J.
AU  - Pervaiz, A.
PY  - 2022
DA  - 2022-06-29
T1  - Survey Data Perspectives Authors and Performers
UR  - https://zenodo.org/records/6779373
DO  - https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6779373
AB  - This deliverable represents the Survey questionnaire developed by Abeer Pervaiz and Joost Poort and the ensuing data set. The survey has been translated into 22 official EU languages and is targeted at artists belonging to a wide range of creative fields (authors, performers, designers, singers, musicians, dancers and more) within the EU. The survey has been distributed through different social media platforms such as Instagram, Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn, various social groups, websites and also via networking. This document gives an overview of the participant data that has been collected till 16 February 2022. The data provides both descriptive and visual information. Descriptive data concerning the response will be updated once the survey is closed. This document and the data set together form deliverable D3.2. Following the descriptive participant data is the survey questionnaire. Each question statement represents a labeled value that is shown in brackets. The question statements have also been denoted with a variable value.
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

article{nokey,
	title = {Survey Data Perspectives Authors and Performers},
	author = {Poort, J. and Pervaiz, A.},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6779373},
	year = {2022},
	date = {2022-06-29},
	abstract = {This deliverable represents the Survey questionnaire developed by Abeer Pervaiz and Joost Poort and the ensuing data set. The survey has been translated into 22 official EU languages and is targeted at artists belonging to a wide range of creative fields (authors, performers, designers, singers, musicians, dancers and more) within the EU. The survey has been distributed through different social media platforms such as Instagram, Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn, various social groups, websites and also via networking. This document gives an overview of the participant data that has been collected till 16 February 2022. The data provides both descriptive and visual information. Descriptive data concerning the response will be updated once the survey is closed. This document and the data set together form deliverable D3.2. Following the descriptive participant data is the survey questionnaire. Each question statement represents a labeled value that is shown in brackets. The question statements have also been denoted with a variable value.},
}

Save .bib

Filtered Futures Conference: Exploring the Fundamental Rights Constraints of Automated Filtering After the CJEU Ruling on Article 17 external link

Reda, F. & Keller, P.

Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2022

Links

http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/06/17/filtered-futures-conference-exploring-the-fundamental-rights-constraints-of-automated-filtering-after-the-cjeu-ruling-on-article-17/

frontpage

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Algorithms Off-limits? If digital trade law restricts access to source code of software then accountability will suffer external link

Irion, K.

2022

Abstract

Free trade agreements are increasingly used to construct an additional layer of protection for source code of software. This comes in the shape of a new prohibition for governments to require access to, or transfer of, source code of software, subject to certain exceptions. A clause on software source code is also part and parcel of an ambitious set of new rules on trade-related aspects of electronic commerce currently negotiated by 86 members of the World Trade Organization. Our understanding to date of how such a commitment inside trade law impacts on governments right to regulate digital technologies and the policy space that is allowed under trade law is limited. Access to software source code is for example necessary to meet regulatory and judicial needs in order to ensure that digital technologies are in conformity with individuals’ human rights and societal values. This article will analyze the implications of such a source code clause for current and future digital policies by governments that aim to ensure transparency, fairness and accountability of computer and machine learning algorithms.

Links

https://www.ivir.nl/facct22-125-2/

accountability, algorithms, application programming interfaces, auditability, Digital trade, fairness, frontpage, source code, Transparency

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Irion, K.
PY  - 0617
DA  - 2022-06-17
T1  - Algorithms Off-limits? If digital trade law restricts access to source code of software then accountability will suffer
AB  - Free trade agreements are increasingly used to construct an additional layer of protection for source code of software. This comes in the shape of a new prohibition for governments to require access to, or transfer of, source code of software, subject to certain exceptions. A clause on software source code is also part and parcel of an ambitious set of new rules on trade-related aspects of electronic commerce currently negotiated by 86 members of the World Trade Organization. Our understanding to date of how such a commitment inside trade law impacts on governments right to regulate digital technologies and the policy space that is allowed under trade law is limited. Access to software source code is for example necessary to meet regulatory and judicial needs in order to ensure that digital technologies are in conformity with individuals’ human rights and societal values. This article will analyze the implications of such a source code clause for current and future digital policies by governments that aim to ensure transparency, fairness and accountability of computer and machine learning algorithms.
K1  - accountability
K1  - algorithms
K1  - application programming interfaces
K1  - auditability
K1  - Digital trade
K1  - fairness
K1  - frontpage
K1  - source code
K1  - Transparency
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Article{Irion2022b,
	title = {Algorithms Off-limits? If digital trade law restricts access to source code of software then accountability will suffer},
	author = {Irion, K.},
	url = {https://www.ivir.nl/facct22-125-2/},
	year = {0617},
	date = {2022-06-17},
	abstract = {Free trade agreements are increasingly used to construct an additional layer of protection for source code of software. This comes in the shape of a new prohibition for governments to require access to, or transfer of, source code of software, subject to certain exceptions. A clause on software source code is also part and parcel of an ambitious set of new rules on trade-related aspects of electronic commerce currently negotiated by 86 members of the World Trade Organization. Our understanding to date of how such a commitment inside trade law impacts on governments right to regulate digital technologies and the policy space that is allowed under trade law is limited. Access to software source code is for example necessary to meet regulatory and judicial needs in order to ensure that digital technologies are in conformity with individuals’ human rights and societal values. This article will analyze the implications of such a source code clause for current and future digital policies by governments that aim to ensure transparency, fairness and accountability of computer and machine learning algorithms.},
	keywords = {accountability, algorithms, application programming interfaces, auditability, Digital trade, fairness, frontpage, source code, Transparency},
}

Save .bib

Defining the scope of AI ADM system risk assessment external link

Janssen, H., Seng Ah Lee, M., Singh, J. & Cobbe, J.

Research handbook on EU data protection law, E. Kosta, R. Leenes & I. Kamara (ed.), Edgar Elgar Publishing, 0616, pp: 405-434

Links

frontpage, Privacy, Recht op gegevensbescherming

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Data intermediary external link

Janssen, H. & Singh, J.

Internet Policy Review, vol. 11, iss. : 1, 2022

Abstract

Data intermediaries serve as a mediator between those who wish to make their data available, and those who seek to leverage that data. The intermediary works to govern the data in specific ways, and provides some degree of confidence regarding how the data will be used.

Links

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14763/2022.1.1644

frontpage, online intermediaries, Technologie en recht

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Personal Information Management Systems external link

Janssen, H. & Singh, J.

Internet Policy Review, vol. 11, iss. : 2, 2022

Abstract

Personal Information Management Systems (PIMS) seek to empower users by equipping them with mechanisms for mediating, monitoring and controlling how their data is accessed, used, or shared.

Links

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14763/2022.2.1659

frontpage, personal information management systems, pims, Technologie en recht, zelfregulering

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Annotatie bij Rb Noord-Holland 6 oktober 2021 (Kamerlid / LinkedIn Ierland & LinkedIn Nederland) external link

Leerssen, P.

Computerrecht, iss. : 3, num: 97, pp: 228-230, 2022

Links

https://www.ivir.nl/annotatie_computerrecht_2022_97/

Art. 10 EVRM, desinformatie, frontpage, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

A Matter of (Joint) control? Virtual assistants and the general data protection regulation external link

Mil, J. van & Quintais, J.

Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 45, 2022

Abstract

This article provides an overview and critical examination of the rules for determining who qualifies as controller or joint controller under the General Data Protection Regulation. Using Google Assistant – an artificial intelligence-driven virtual assistant – as a case study, we argue that these rules are overreaching and difficult to apply in the present-day information society and Internet of Things environments. First, as a consequence of recent developments in case law and supervisory guidance, these rules lead to a complex and ambiguous test to determine (joint) control. Second, due to advances in technological applications and business models, it is increasingly challenging to apply such rules to contemporary processing operations. In particular, as illustrated by the Google Assistant, individuals will likely be qualified as joint controllers, together with Google and also third-party developers, for at least the collection and possible transmission of other individuals’ personal data via the virtual assistant. Third, we identify follow-on issues relating to the apportionment of responsibilities between joint controllers and the effective and complete protection of data subjects. We conclude by questioning whether the framework for determining who qualifies as controller or joint controller is future-proof and normatively desirable.

Links

DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105689

frontpage, GDPR, Privacy, Recht op gegevensbescherming

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mil, J. van
AU  - Quintais, J.
PY  - 0616
DA  - 2022-06-16
T1  - A Matter of (Joint) control? Virtual assistants and the general data protection regulation
JO  - Computer Law & Security Review
VL  - 45
DO  - https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105689
AB  - This article provides an overview and critical examination of the rules for determining who qualifies as controller or joint controller under the General Data Protection Regulation. Using Google Assistant – an artificial intelligence-driven virtual assistant – as a case study, we argue that these rules are overreaching and difficult to apply in the present-day information society and Internet of Things environments. First, as a consequence of recent developments in case law and supervisory guidance, these rules lead to a complex and ambiguous test to determine (joint) control. Second, due to advances in technological applications and business models, it is increasingly challenging to apply such rules to contemporary processing operations. In particular, as illustrated by the Google Assistant, individuals will likely be qualified as joint controllers, together with Google and also third-party developers, for at least the collection and possible transmission of other individuals’ personal data via the virtual assistant. Third, we identify follow-on issues relating to the apportionment of responsibilities between joint controllers and the effective and complete protection of data subjects. We conclude by questioning whether the framework for determining who qualifies as controller or joint controller is future-proof and normatively desirable.
K1  - frontpage
K1  - GDPR
K1  - Privacy
K1  - Recht op gegevensbescherming
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Article{nokey,
	title = {A Matter of (Joint) control? Virtual assistants and the general data protection regulation},
	author = {Mil, J. van and Quintais, J.},
	doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105689},
	year = {0616},
	date = {2022-06-16},
	journal = {Computer Law & Security Review},
	volume = {45},
	abstract = {This article provides an overview and critical examination of the rules for determining who qualifies as controller or joint controller under the General Data Protection Regulation. Using Google Assistant – an artificial intelligence-driven virtual assistant – as a case study, we argue that these rules are overreaching and difficult to apply in the present-day information society and Internet of Things environments. First, as a consequence of recent developments in case law and supervisory guidance, these rules lead to a complex and ambiguous test to determine (joint) control. Second, due to advances in technological applications and business models, it is increasingly challenging to apply such rules to contemporary processing operations. In particular, as illustrated by the Google Assistant, individuals will likely be qualified as joint controllers, together with Google and also third-party developers, for at least the collection and possible transmission of other individuals’ personal data via the virtual assistant. Third, we identify follow-on issues relating to the apportionment of responsibilities between joint controllers and the effective and complete protection of data subjects. We conclude by questioning whether the framework for determining who qualifies as controller or joint controller is future-proof and normatively desirable.},
	keywords = {frontpage, GDPR, Privacy, Recht op gegevensbescherming},
}

Save .bib

Inbreng Rondetafelgesprek over de Wet kansspelen op afstand external link

Poort, J.

2022

Links

https://www.ivir.nl/inbreng-rondetafel_kansspelen_9juni2022/ https://debatgemist.tweedekamer.nl/debatten/wet-kansspelen-op-afstand

frontpage, kansspelen

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Top Keywords

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Links

RIS

Bibtex