Publications - Page 65 of 269

Safety of journalists and the fighting of corruption in the EU external link

McGonagle, T., Fahy, R., Bouchè, G., Rucz, M., Stapel, S., Seel, M. & Sangen, A, van der

2020

Abstract

Journalism and journalists face a growing range of threats, including violence and harassment; the misuse of defamation and other laws against them, and restrictive measures on freedom of information and expression adopted in response to the Covid-19 crisis. States must ensure a safe and favourable environment for journalists to perform their public watchdog function. This study, commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the LIBE Committee, examines the overall chilling effect of crimes and threats against journalists and explores various regulatory and other measures to counter them. This report was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs.

Links

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/655187/IPOL_STU(2020)655187_EN.pdf

corruptie, frontpage, Journalistiek, Media law, veiligheid

RIS

TY  - RPRT
AU  - McGonagle, T.
AU  - Fahy, R.
AU  - Bouchè, G.
AU  - Rucz, M.
AU  - Stapel, S.
AU  - Seel, M.
AU  - Sangen, A, van der
PY  - 0730
DA  - 2020-07-30
T1  - Safety of journalists and the fighting of corruption in the EU
AB  - Journalism and journalists face a growing range of threats, including violence and harassment; the misuse of defamation and other laws against them, and restrictive measures on freedom of information and expression adopted in response to the Covid-19 crisis. States must ensure a safe and favourable environment for journalists to perform their public watchdog function. This study, commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the LIBE Committee, examines the overall chilling effect of crimes and threats against journalists and explores various regulatory and other measures to counter them.

This report was requested by the European Parliament\'s Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs.
K1  - corruptie
K1  - frontpage
K1  - Journalistiek
K1  - Media law
K1  - veiligheid
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Report{McGonagle2020f,
	title = {Safety of journalists and the fighting of corruption in the EU},
	author = {McGonagle, T. and Fahy, R. and Bouchè, G. and Rucz, M. and Stapel, S. and Seel, M. and Sangen, A, van der},
	url = {https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/655187/IPOL_STU(2020)655187_EN.pdf},
	year = {0730},
	date = {2020-07-30},
	abstract = {Journalism and journalists face a growing range of threats, including violence and harassment; the misuse of defamation and other laws against them, and restrictive measures on freedom of information and expression adopted in response to the Covid-19 crisis. States must ensure a safe and favourable environment for journalists to perform their public watchdog function. This study, commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the LIBE Committee, examines the overall chilling effect of crimes and threats against journalists and explores various regulatory and other measures to counter them.

This report was requested by the European Parliament\'s Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs.},
	keywords = {corruptie, frontpage, Journalistiek, Media law, veiligheid},
}

Save .bib

The post-editorial control era: how EU media law matches platforms’ organisational control with cooperative responsibility external link

Drunen, M. van

Journal of Media Law, vol. 12, num: 2, pp: 166-190, 2020

Abstract

This paper argues the AVMSD attaches cooperative responsibility to platforms’ organisational control. Firstly, it explores how the new concept of organisational control differs from the editorial control that has traditionally been central to media law, in particular concerning the greater involvement of other stakeholders active on platforms. Secondly, it analyses the measures the AVMSD requires platforms to take with regard to content on their service in light of their organisational control. Finally, it shows how the AVMSD not only requires platforms to assume responsibility for actions under their direct control, but also to enable users and uploaders to exercise their inherent influence differently. The AVMSD consequently moves away from centralised, and towards cooperative responsibility for platforms. The paper concludes by evaluating the choices the AVMSD makes (and fails to make) in the operationalisation of this new responsibility model.

Links

AVMS Directive, digital platforms, frontpage, Journalistiek, Media law, redactie

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Drunen, M. van
PY  - 0728
DA  - 2020-07-28
T1  - The post-editorial control era: how EU media law matches platforms’ organisational control with cooperative responsibility
JO  - Journal of Media Law
VL  - 12
NV  - 2
SP  - 166-190
DO  - https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2020.1796067
AB  - This paper argues the AVMSD attaches cooperative responsibility to platforms’ organisational control. Firstly, it explores how the new concept of organisational control differs from the editorial control that has traditionally been central to media law, in particular concerning the greater involvement of other stakeholders active on platforms. Secondly, it analyses the measures the AVMSD requires platforms to take with regard to content on their service in light of their organisational control. Finally, it shows how the AVMSD not only requires platforms to assume responsibility for actions under their direct control, but also to enable users and uploaders to exercise their inherent influence differently. The AVMSD consequently moves away from centralised, and towards cooperative responsibility for platforms. The paper concludes by evaluating the choices the AVMSD makes (and fails to make) in the operationalisation of this new responsibility model.
K1  - AVMS Directive
K1  - digital platforms
K1  - frontpage
K1  - Journalistiek
K1  - Media law
K1  - redactie
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Article{Drunen2020,
	title = {The post-editorial control era: how EU media law matches platforms’ organisational control with cooperative responsibility},
	author = {Drunen, M. van},
	url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17577632.2020.1796067},
	doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2020.1796067},
	year = {0728},
	date = {2020-07-28},
	journal = {Journal of Media Law},
	volume = {12},
	number = {2},
	pages = {166-190},
	abstract = {This paper argues the AVMSD attaches cooperative responsibility to platforms’ organisational control. Firstly, it explores how the new concept of organisational control differs from the editorial control that has traditionally been central to media law, in particular concerning the greater involvement of other stakeholders active on platforms. Secondly, it analyses the measures the AVMSD requires platforms to take with regard to content on their service in light of their organisational control. Finally, it shows how the AVMSD not only requires platforms to assume responsibility for actions under their direct control, but also to enable users and uploaders to exercise their inherent influence differently. The AVMSD consequently moves away from centralised, and towards cooperative responsibility for platforms. The paper concludes by evaluating the choices the AVMSD makes (and fails to make) in the operationalisation of this new responsibility model.},
	keywords = {AVMS Directive, digital platforms, frontpage, Journalistiek, Media law, redactie},
}

Save .bib

Schrems II and Surveillance: Third Countries’ National Security Powers in the Purview of EU Law, European Law Blog external link

Irion, K.

2020

Abstract

On 16 July 2020 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) composed as Grand Chamber delivered its landmark ruling Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Ltd and Maximillian Schrems (case C-311/18, “Schrems II”). The focus of my commentary will be on the aspect that EU law on cross-border transfers of personal data to a third country is not deferential to national security powers of that third country. This judgment is remarkable provided that electronic surveillance conducted by Member States’ intelligence authorities for the purpose of national security is off limits for EU law and that exceptions in international agreement are fairly regularly made for national security. This contribution will deal with the embedded assessment of a third country’s national security powers under the General Data Protection Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2016/679, GDPR) and will address the criticism that a third country is held to stricter standards than a Member State of the Union.

Links

https://europeanlawblog.eu/2020/07/24/schrems-ii-and-surveillance-third-countries-national-security-powers-in-the-purview-of-eu-law/

adequacy decision, C-311/18, Charter of Fundamental Rights, Facebook, frontpage, GDPR, General Data Protection Regulation, national security, Privacy Shield, Schrems II, Standard Contractual Clauses, Surveillance, united states

RIS

TY  - BLOG
AU  - Irion, K.
PY  - 0724
DA  - 2020-07-24
T1  - Schrems II and Surveillance: Third Countries’ National Security Powers in the Purview of EU Law, European Law Blog
AB  - On 16 July 2020 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) composed as Grand Chamber delivered its landmark ruling Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Ltd and Maximillian Schrems (case C-311/18, “Schrems II”). The focus of my commentary will be on the aspect that EU law on cross-border transfers of personal data to a third country is not deferential to national security powers of that third country. This judgment is remarkable provided that electronic surveillance conducted by Member States’ intelligence authorities for the purpose of national security is off limits for EU law and that exceptions in international agreement are fairly regularly made for national security. This contribution will deal with the embedded assessment of a third country’s national security powers under the General Data Protection Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2016/679, GDPR) and will address the criticism that a third country is held to stricter standards than a Member State of the Union.
K1  - adequacy decision
K1  - C-311/18
K1  - Charter of Fundamental Rights
K1  - Facebook
K1  - frontpage
K1  - GDPR
K1  - General Data Protection Regulation
K1  - national security
K1  - Privacy Shield
K1  - Schrems II
K1  - Standard Contractual Clauses
K1  - Surveillance
K1  - united states
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Online publication{Irion2020c,
	title = {Schrems II and Surveillance: Third Countries’ National Security Powers in the Purview of EU Law, European Law Blog},
	author = {Irion, K.},
	url = {https://europeanlawblog.eu/2020/07/24/schrems-ii-and-surveillance-third-countries-national-security-powers-in-the-purview-of-eu-law/},
	year = {0724},
	date = {2020-07-24},
	abstract = {On 16 July 2020 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) composed as Grand Chamber delivered its landmark ruling Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Ltd and Maximillian Schrems (case C-311/18, “Schrems II”). The focus of my commentary will be on the aspect that EU law on cross-border transfers of personal data to a third country is not deferential to national security powers of that third country. This judgment is remarkable provided that electronic surveillance conducted by Member States’ intelligence authorities for the purpose of national security is off limits for EU law and that exceptions in international agreement are fairly regularly made for national security. This contribution will deal with the embedded assessment of a third country’s national security powers under the General Data Protection Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2016/679, GDPR) and will address the criticism that a third country is held to stricter standards than a Member State of the Union.},
	keywords = {adequacy decision, C-311/18, Charter of Fundamental Rights, Facebook, frontpage, GDPR, General Data Protection Regulation, national security, Privacy Shield, Schrems II, Standard Contractual Clauses, Surveillance, united states},
}

Save .bib

Annotatie bij Rb Amsterdam 1 november 2019 (Van Uem / De Persgroep) external link

Hugenholtz, P.B.

AMI, num: 3-4, pp: 101-105, 2020

Links

https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_AMI_2020_3_4.pdf

Annotaties, Auteursrecht, billijke vergoeding, freelancers, frontpage, Journalistiek

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Auteursrecht op robotcreaties? Een analyse op basis van de incentivetheorie external link

Buijtelaar, L.D. & Senftleben, M.

AMI, num: 3-4, pp: 77-93, 2020

Abstract

Vandaag de dag zijn teksten, schilderijen en liedjes niet noodzakelijkerwijs het resultaat van menselijke creativiteit. Geavanceerde robotsystemen zijn in staat om output te genereren die nauwelijks te onderscheiden is van de werken van makers van vlees en bloed. Dit doet de vraag rijzen of door robots gegenereerde creaties in aanmerking kunnen komen voor auteursrechtelijke bescherming. In de volgende analyse staat deze vraag centraal. Na een inleidende bespreking van het traditionele vereiste van menselijke creativiteit in het auteursrecht dienen de ratio’s van auteursrechtelijke bescherming – met name de economische incentivetheorie – als maatstaf om over nut en noodzaak van de toekenning van bescherming te beslissen. Voorts wordt aandacht besteed aan de vraag wie de houder van rechten op robotcreaties zou kunnen zijn. Ten slotte vindt een afweging plaats van de voor- en nadelen van bescherming, mede in het licht van de mogelijkheid om robotcreaties vrij te laten en het publieke domein te verrijken.

Links

https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AMI_2020_3_4_77.pdf

Artificial intelligence, Auteursrecht, creativiteit, frontpage, robotica

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Buijtelaar, L.D.
AU  - Senftleben, M.
PY  - 0724
DA  - 2020-07-24
T1  - Auteursrecht op robotcreaties? Een analyse op basis van de incentivetheorie
JO  - AMI
NV  - 3-4
SP  - 77-93
AB  - Vandaag de dag zijn teksten, schilderijen en liedjes niet noodzakelijkerwijs het resultaat van menselijke creativiteit. Geavanceerde robotsystemen zijn in staat om output te genereren die nauwelijks te onderscheiden is van de werken van makers van vlees en bloed. Dit doet de vraag rijzen of door robots gegenereerde creaties in aanmerking kunnen komen voor auteursrechtelijke bescherming. In de volgende analyse staat deze vraag centraal. Na een inleidende bespreking van het traditionele vereiste van menselijke creativiteit in het auteursrecht dienen de ratio’s van auteursrechtelijke bescherming – met name de economische incentivetheorie – als maatstaf om over nut en noodzaak van de toekenning van bescherming te beslissen. Voorts wordt aandacht besteed aan de vraag wie de houder van rechten op robotcreaties zou kunnen zijn. Ten slotte vindt een afweging plaats van de voor- en nadelen van bescherming, mede in het licht van de mogelijkheid om robotcreaties vrij te laten en het publieke domein te verrijken.
K1  - Artificial intelligence
K1  - Auteursrecht
K1  - creativiteit
K1  - frontpage
K1  - robotica
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Article{Buijtelaar2020,
	title = {Auteursrecht op robotcreaties? Een analyse op basis van de incentivetheorie},
	author = {Buijtelaar, L.D. and Senftleben, M.},
	url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AMI_2020_3_4_77.pdf},
	year = {0724},
	date = {2020-07-24},
	journal = {AMI},
	number = {3-4},
	pages = {77-93},
	abstract = {Vandaag de dag zijn teksten, schilderijen en liedjes niet noodzakelijkerwijs het resultaat van menselijke creativiteit. Geavanceerde robotsystemen zijn in staat om output te genereren die nauwelijks te onderscheiden is van de werken van makers van vlees en bloed. Dit doet de vraag rijzen of door robots gegenereerde creaties in aanmerking kunnen komen voor auteursrechtelijke bescherming. In de volgende analyse staat deze vraag centraal. Na een inleidende bespreking van het traditionele vereiste van menselijke creativiteit in het auteursrecht dienen de ratio’s van auteursrechtelijke bescherming – met name de economische incentivetheorie – als maatstaf om over nut en noodzaak van de toekenning van bescherming te beslissen. Voorts wordt aandacht besteed aan de vraag wie de houder van rechten op robotcreaties zou kunnen zijn. Ten slotte vindt een afweging plaats van de voor- en nadelen van bescherming, mede in het licht van de mogelijkheid om robotcreaties vrij te laten en het publieke domein te verrijken.},
	keywords = {Artificial intelligence, Auteursrecht, creativiteit, frontpage, robotica},
}

Save .bib

The regulation of crypto-assets in the EU – investment and payment tokens under the radar external link

Ferrari, V.

Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 2020

Abstract

Based on the guidelines issued by the European Securities and Market Authority and by the European Banking Authority, the article deals with the legal qualification of blockchain-based crypto-assets under EU law. Focusing on crypto-assets that function as a) investment instruments (that is, investment tokens) and as b) electronic money (that is, payment tokens), the work outlines shortages and drawbacks in the applicability and enforcement of existing EU legal frameworks regulating investment activities and payment services. With such analysis, the article seeks to inform the ongoing debate within European institutions on the need of regulatory intervention in this area, and it points out pressing questions to be tackled by further research.

Links

Crypto-assets, cryptocurrencies, enforcement, EU law, financial regulation, fintech, frontpage, Technologie en recht

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ferrari, V.
PY  - 0521
DA  - 2020-05-21
T1  - The regulation of crypto-assets in the EU – investment and payment tokens under the radar
JO  - Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
DO  - https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X20911538
AB  - Based on the guidelines issued by the European Securities and Market Authority and by the European Banking Authority, the article deals with the legal qualification of blockchain-based crypto-assets under EU law. Focusing on crypto-assets that function as a) investment instruments (that is, investment tokens) and as b) electronic money (that is, payment tokens), the work outlines shortages and drawbacks in the applicability and enforcement of existing EU legal frameworks regulating investment activities and payment services. With such analysis, the article seeks to inform the ongoing debate within European institutions on the need of regulatory intervention in this area, and it points out pressing questions to be tackled by further research.
K1  - Crypto-assets
K1  - cryptocurrencies
K1  - enforcement
K1  - EU law
K1  - financial regulation
K1  - fintech
K1  - frontpage
K1  - Technologie en recht
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Article{Ferrari2020,
	title = {The regulation of crypto-assets in the EU – investment and payment tokens under the radar},
	author = {Ferrari, V.},
	url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1023263X20911538},
	doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X20911538},
	year = {0521},
	date = {2020-05-21},
	journal = {Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law},
	abstract = {Based on the guidelines issued by the European Securities and Market Authority and by the European Banking Authority, the article deals with the legal qualification of blockchain-based crypto-assets under EU law. Focusing on crypto-assets that function as a) investment instruments (that is, investment tokens) and as b) electronic money (that is, payment tokens), the work outlines shortages and drawbacks in the applicability and enforcement of existing EU legal frameworks regulating investment activities and payment services. With such analysis, the article seeks to inform the ongoing debate within European institutions on the need of regulatory intervention in this area, and it points out pressing questions to be tackled by further research.},
	keywords = {Crypto-assets, cryptocurrencies, enforcement, EU law, financial regulation, fintech, frontpage, Technologie en recht},
}

Save .bib

Annotatie HvJ EU 2 oktober 2018 (Ministerio Fiscal) external link

Dommering, E.

Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, num: 28, pp: 3753-3754, 2020

Abstract

Toegang tot door elektronische communicatiedienstaanbieder verwerkte persoonsgegevens alleen gerechtvaardigd als het om ernstig delict gaat. Identificatiegegevens op SIMkaart van gestolen mobiele telefoon ook bij lichtere vormen van criminaliteit toegestaan toegestaan omdat deze op zich zelf geen inzicht geven in de privé communicatie.

Links

https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_232.pdf

Annotaties, elektronische communicatie, frontpage, persoonsgevens, Privacy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Kroniek Persrecht 2019 external link

Volgenant, O. & McGonagle, T.

Mediaforum, vol. 2020, num: 3, pp: 87-89, 2020

Abstract

Was 2018 het jaar van de serieuze aanslagen op de gebouwen van De Telegraaf en Panorama en ernstige bedreigingen van individuele journalisten, in 2019 zagen we hoe de beroepsgroep en de overheid daarop reageerden. Het initiatief ‘PersVeilig’ werd gepresenteerd, en in de strafzaken over de twee aanslagen werden verdachten opgepakt en veroordeeld. In 2019 werd – helaas – voor het eerst sinds lange tijd weer een journalist gegijzeld, ondanks het feit dat een jaar eerder het recht op journalistieke bronbescherming wettelijk was verankerd.

Links

https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Mediaforum_2020_3_Volgenant.pdf

Kronieken, Mediarecht, Persrecht

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Harnessing the collective potential of GDPR access rights: towards an ecology of transparency external link

Mahieu, R. & Ausloos, J.

Internet Policy Review, 2020

Abstract

The GDPR’s goal of empowering citizens can only be fully realised when the collective dimensions of data subject rights are acknowledged and supported through proper enforcement. The power of the collective use of data subjects’ rights, however, is currently neither acknowledged nor properly enforced. This is the message we sent to the European Commission in response to its call for feedback for its two-year review of the GDPR. In our submission entitled Recognising and Enabling the Collective Dimension of the GDPR and the Right of Access – A call to support the governance structure of checks and balances for informational power asymmetries, we demonstrate the collective potential of GDPR access rights with a long list of real-life examples.

Links

https://policyreview.info/articles/news/harnessing-collective-potential-gdpr-access-rights-towards-ecology-transparency/1487

frontpage, GDPR, Privacy, transparantie

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mahieu, R.
AU  - Ausloos, J.
PY  - 0717
DA  - 2020-07-17
T1  - Harnessing the collective potential of GDPR access rights: towards an ecology of transparency
JO  - Internet Policy Review
AB  - The GDPR’s goal of empowering citizens can only be fully realised when the collective dimensions of data subject rights are acknowledged and supported through proper enforcement. The power of the collective use of data subjects’ rights, however, is currently neither acknowledged nor properly enforced. This is the message we sent to the European Commission in response to its call for feedback for its two-year review of the GDPR. In our submission entitled Recognising and Enabling the Collective Dimension of the GDPR and the Right of Access – A call to support the governance structure of checks and balances for informational power asymmetries, we demonstrate the collective potential of GDPR access rights with a long list of real-life examples.
K1  - frontpage
K1  - GDPR
K1  - Privacy
K1  - transparantie
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Article{Mahieu2020,
	title = {Harnessing the collective potential of GDPR access rights: towards an ecology of transparency},
	author = {Mahieu, R. and Ausloos, J.},
	url = {https://policyreview.info/articles/news/harnessing-collective-potential-gdpr-access-rights-towards-ecology-transparency/1487},
	year = {0717},
	date = {2020-07-17},
	journal = {Internet Policy Review},
	abstract = {The GDPR’s goal of empowering citizens can only be fully realised when the collective dimensions of data subject rights are acknowledged and supported through proper enforcement. The power of the collective use of data subjects’ rights, however, is currently neither acknowledged nor properly enforced. This is the message we sent to the European Commission in response to its call for feedback for its two-year review of the GDPR. In our submission entitled Recognising and Enabling the Collective Dimension of the GDPR and the Right of Access – A call to support the governance structure of checks and balances for informational power asymmetries, we demonstrate the collective potential of GDPR access rights with a long list of real-life examples.},
	keywords = {frontpage, GDPR, Privacy, transparantie},
}

Save .bib

Mediated trust: A theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediators external link

Bodó, B.

New Media & Society, 2020

Abstract

This article considers the impact of digital technologies on the interpersonal and institutional logics of trust production. It introduces the new theoretical concept of technology-mediated trust to analyze the role of complex techno-social assemblages in trust production and distrust management. The first part of the article argues that globalization and digitalization have unleashed a crisis of trust, as traditional institutional and interpersonal logics are not attuned to deal with the risks introduced by the prevalence of digital technologies. In the second part, the article describes how digital intermediation has transformed the traditional logics of interpersonal and institutional trust formation and created new trust-mediating services. Finally, the article asks as follows: why should we trust these technological trust mediators? The conclusion is that at best, it is impossible to establish the trustworthiness of trust mediators, and that at worst, we have no reason to trust them.

Links

digitale technologie, frontpage, Informatierecht, Regulering, trust

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bodó, B.
PY  - 0717
DA  - 2020-07-17
T1  - Mediated trust: A theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediators
JO  - New Media & Society
DO  - https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820939922
AB  - This article considers the impact of digital technologies on the interpersonal and institutional logics of trust production. It introduces the new theoretical concept of technology-mediated trust to analyze the role of complex techno-social assemblages in trust production and distrust management. The first part of the article argues that globalization and digitalization have unleashed a crisis of trust, as traditional institutional and interpersonal logics are not attuned to deal with the risks introduced by the prevalence of digital technologies. In the second part, the article describes how digital intermediation has transformed the traditional logics of interpersonal and institutional trust formation and created new trust-mediating services. Finally, the article asks as follows: why should we trust these technological trust mediators? The conclusion is that at best, it is impossible to establish the trustworthiness of trust mediators, and that at worst, we have no reason to trust them.
K1  - digitale technologie
K1  - frontpage
K1  - Informatierecht
K1  - Regulering
K1  - trust
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Article{Bodó2020b,
	title = {Mediated trust: A theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediators},
	author = {Bodó, B.},
	url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461444820939922},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820939922},
	year = {0717},
	date = {2020-07-17},
	journal = {New Media & Society},
	abstract = {This article considers the impact of digital technologies on the interpersonal and institutional logics of trust production. It introduces the new theoretical concept of technology-mediated trust to analyze the role of complex techno-social assemblages in trust production and distrust management. The first part of the article argues that globalization and digitalization have unleashed a crisis of trust, as traditional institutional and interpersonal logics are not attuned to deal with the risks introduced by the prevalence of digital technologies. In the second part, the article describes how digital intermediation has transformed the traditional logics of interpersonal and institutional trust formation and created new trust-mediating services. Finally, the article asks as follows: why should we trust these technological trust mediators? The conclusion is that at best, it is impossible to establish the trustworthiness of trust mediators, and that at worst, we have no reason to trust them.},
	keywords = {digitale technologie, frontpage, Informatierecht, Regulering, trust},
}

Save .bib

Top Keywords

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex