European audiovisual media policy in the age of global video on demand services: A case study of Netflix in the Netherlands external link

Idiz, D. R, Irion, K., Ebbers, J. & Vliegenthart, R.
Journal of Digital Media & Policy, vol. 12, num: 3, pp: 425-449, 2022

Abstract

This article considers the provisions in the European Union’s revised Audiovisual Media Services Directive concerning video on demand (VOD) services and the effectiveness of supply-side cultural diversity regulations in achieving their purported policy goals of increased production and consumption of European works. Because the Netherlands is the ‘country of origin’ to several multinational VOD services, including Netflix, we conducted a case study of this specific national context. We examine the quota for and prominence of European works, as well as different forms of financial obligations. We find that the former two policy tools may require new strategies to effectively reach their objectives in a nonlinear context. Our evidence also indicates that the latter remains controversial in the domestic audiovisual industry, as stakeholder positions are dependent on the type(s) of production stimulated. Based on this, we argue that securing the independence of producers and ensuring VOD services are transparent with respect to performance data are essential to promoting source diversity and a sustainable value chain.

Audiovisual Media Services Directive, cultural diversity, frontpage, Media policy, Netflix, nonlinear television, prominence, quota, video on demand regulation

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Article 17, the year in review (2021 edition) external link

Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2022

Art. 17, Auteursrecht, frontpage

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Microtargeted propaganda by foreign actors: An interdisciplinary exploration external link

Fahy, R., Dobber, T., Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. & Shires, J.
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, pp: 856-877, 2022

Abstract

This article discusses a problem that has received scant attention in literature: microtargeted propaganda by foreign actors. Microtargeting involves collecting information about people, and using that information to show them targeted political advertisements. Such microtargeting enables advertisers to target ads to specific groups of people, for instance people who visit certain websites, forums, or Facebook groups. This article focuses on one type of microtargeting: microtargeting by foreign actors. For example, Russia has targeted certain groups in the US with ads, aiming to sow discord. Foreign actors could also try to influence European elections, for instance by advertising in favour of a certain political party. Foreign propaganda possibilities existed before microtargeting. This article explores two questions. In what ways, if any, is microtargeted propaganda by foreign actors different from other foreign propaganda? What could lawmakers in Europe do to mitigate the risks of microtargeted propaganda?

EU law, frontpage, gegevensbescherming, microtargeting, propaganda, Regulering, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Lockdowns zijn niet meer te rechtvaardigen external link

Baarsma, B., Broek-Altenburg, E. van den, Berg, G. van den, Dommering, E. & Teulings, C.
NRC, 2022

corona, economische aspecten, Informatierecht

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Naar een coronabeleid zonder lockdowns external link

Baarsma, B., Broek-Altenburg, E. van den, Berg, G. van den, Dommering, E. & Teulings, C.
ESB, 2022

corona, economische aspecten, Informatierecht

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

European Copyright Society – Comment on Copyright and the Digital Services Act Proposal external link

Peukert, A., Husovec, M., Kretschmer, M., Mezei, P. & Quintais, J.
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law , vol. 53, iss. : 3, pp: 358-376, 2022

Auteursrecht, Digital Services Act (DSA), european copyright society, frontpage

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

European Copyright Society (ECS): Comment on Copyright and the Digital Services Act Proposal external link

Peukert, A., Husovec, M., Kretschmer, M., Mezei, P. & Quintais, J.
Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2022

Auteursrecht, Digital Services Act (DSA), frontpage

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Trademark Law, AI-driven Behavioral Advertising, and the Digital Services Act: Toward Source and Parameter Transparency for Consumers, Brand Owners and Competitors external link

Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Artificial Intelligence, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022, pp: 309-324, ISBN: 9781800881891

Abstract

In its Proposal for a Digital Services Act (“DSA”), the European Commission highlighted the need for new transparency obligations to arrive at accountable digital services, ensure a fair environment for economic operators and empower consumers. However, the proposed new rules seem to focus on transparency measures for consumers. According to the DSA Proposal, platforms, such as online marketplaces, must ensure that platform users receive information enabling them to understand when and on whose behalf an advertisement is displayed, and which parameters are used to direct advertising to them, including explanations of the logic underlying systems for targeted advertising. Statements addressing the interests of trademark owners and trademark policy are sought in vain. Against this background, the analysis sheds light on AI-driven behavioural advertising practices and the policy considerations underlying the proposed new transparency obligations. In the light of the debate on trademark protection in keyword advertising cases, it will show that not only consumers but also trademark owners have a legitimate interest in receiving information on the parameters that are used to target consumers. The discussion will lead to the insight that lessons from the keyword advertising debate can play an important role in the transparency discourse because they broaden the spectrum of policy rationales and guidelines for new transparency rules. In addition to the current focus on consumer empowerment, the enhancement of information on alternative offers in the marketplace and the strengthening of trust in AI-driven, personalized advertising enter the picture. On balance, there are good reasons to broaden the scope of the DSA initiative and ensure access to transparency information for consumers and trademark owners alike.

Artificial intelligence, Trademark law

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

No Trademark Protection for Artworks in the Public Domain – A Practical Guide to the Application of Public Order and Morality as Grounds for Refusal external link

GRUR International, vol. 71, num: 1, pp: 3-17, 2022

Abstract

With its 2017 landmark decision in Vigeland, the Court of Justice of the European Free Trade Association States (EFTA Court) has paved the way for the invocation of public order and morality as grounds for refusal when trademark protection is sought for cultural expressions in the public domain. Dealing with an attempt to register artworks of the famous Norwegian sculptor Gustav Vigeland as trademarks, the EFTA Court took this step to safeguard the public domain status of literary and artistic works after the expiry of copyright, shield cultural creations against ‘commercial greed’ and ensure the freedom of the arts.1 Trademark examiners and judges seeking to follow in the footsteps of the EFTA Court, however, may find it difficult to operationalize the Vigeland criteria and put corresponding arguments for refusal into practice. Against this background, the following analysis provides guidelines for the practical application of public order and morality arguments in cultural heritage cases. It describes problems arising from the grant of trademark rights in cultural public domain material (Section I) and the traditional reluctance of trademark offices and courts to rely on public order and morality considerations in this context (Section II). After this statement of the problem, the criteria following from the Vigeland decision will be introduced (Section III) before we explore the practical implementation of the EFTA Court’s morality (Section IV) and public order (Section V) arguments in more detail. The final Section VI summarizes the results of the analysis.

frontpage, kunst, Merkenrecht, publiek domein

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Choice Architectures in the Digital Economy: Towards a New Understanding of Digital Vulnerability external link

Helberger, N., Sax, M., Strycharz, J. & Micklitz, H.-W.
Journal of Consumer Policy, vol. 45, iss. : 2, pp: 175-200, 2022

Abstract

In the digital economy, consumer vulnerability is not simply a vantage point from which to assess some consumers’ lack of ability to activate their awareness of persuasion. Instead, digital vulnerability describes a universal state of defencelessness and susceptibility to (the exploitation of) power imbalances that are the result of the increasing automation of commerce, datafied consumer–seller relations, and the very architecture of digital marketplaces. Digital vulnerability, we argue, is architectural, relational, and data-driven. Based on our concept of digital vulnerability, we demonstrate how and why using digital technology to render consumers vulnerable is the epitome of an unfair digital commercial practice.

dark patterns, data-driven marketing strategies, digital marketplaces, manipulation, Platforms, unfair commercial practices, vulnerability

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib