Publications - Page 42 of 267

User-centric identity management systems are gaining momentum as concerns about Big Tech and Big Government rise. Many of these systems are framed as offering Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI). Yet, competing appropriation and the social embedding of SSI have resulted in diverging interpretations. These vague and value-laden interpretations can damage the public discourse and risk misrepresenting values and affordances that technology offers to users. To unpack the various social and technical understandings of SSI, we adopt an ‘interpretive flexibility’ lens. Based on a qualitative inductive interview study, we find that SSI’s interpretation is strongly mediated by surrounding institutional properties. Our study helps to better navigate these different perceptions and highlights the need for a multidimensional framework that can improve the understanding of complex socio-technical systems for digital government practitioners, researchers, and policy-makers.

RIS

TY  - CPAPER
AU  - Weigl, L.
AU  - Barbereau, T.
AU  - Rieger, A.
AU  - Fridgen, G.
PY  - 2022
DA  - 2022-01-03
T1  - The Social Construction of Self-Sovereign Identity: An Extended Model of Interpretive Flexibility
UR  - https://aisel.aisnet.org/hicss-55/dg/emerging_topics_in_e-gov/4/
AB  - User-centric identity management systems are gaining momentum as concerns about Big Tech and Big Government rise. Many of these systems are framed as offering Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI). Yet, competing appropriation and the social embedding of SSI have resulted in diverging interpretations. These vague and value-laden interpretations can damage the public discourse and risk misrepresenting values and affordances that technology offers to users. To unpack the various social and technical understandings of SSI, we adopt an ‘interpretive flexibility’ lens. Based on a qualitative inductive interview study, we find that SSI’s interpretation is strongly mediated by surrounding institutional properties. Our study helps to better navigate these different perceptions and highlights the need for a multidimensional framework that can improve the understanding of complex socio-technical systems for digital government practitioners, researchers, and policy-makers.
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Conference paper{nokey,
	title = {The Social Construction of Self-Sovereign Identity: An Extended Model of Interpretive Flexibility},
	author = {Weigl, L. and Barbereau, T. and Rieger, A. and Fridgen, G.},
	year = {2022},
	date = {2022-01-03},
	abstract = {User-centric identity management systems are gaining momentum as concerns about Big Tech and Big Government rise. Many of these systems are framed as offering Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI). Yet, competing appropriation and the social embedding of SSI have resulted in diverging interpretations. These vague and value-laden interpretations can damage the public discourse and risk misrepresenting values and affordances that technology offers to users. To unpack the various social and technical understandings of SSI, we adopt an ‘interpretive flexibility’ lens. Based on a qualitative inductive interview study, we find that SSI’s interpretation is strongly mediated by surrounding institutional properties. Our study helps to better navigate these different perceptions and highlights the need for a multidimensional framework that can improve the understanding of complex socio-technical systems for digital government practitioners, researchers, and policy-makers.},
}

Save .bib

Robustness Check: Evaluating and Strengthening Artistic Use Defences in EU Trademark Law external link

Senftleben, M.

IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law , vol. 53, num: 4, pp: 567-603, 2022

Abstract

The 2015 EU trademark law reform introduced a peculiar rule for reconciling trademark rights with freedom of artistic expression. According to Recital 21 EUTMR and Recital 27 TMD, artistic use can be deemed fair as long as the artist ensures compliance with “honest practices in industrial and commercial matters”. The honest practices proviso forges a link with the provisions on limitations of trademark rights. Article 14(1) EUTMR and Art. 14(1) TMD exempt from the control of trademark proprietors several types of use that can allow for artistic use. All these limitations, however, apply only when the use satisfies the test of honest practices. Confirming the obligation to comply with honest practices in industrial and commercial matters, the fairness rule of Recital 21 EUTMR and Recital 27 TMD turns out to be a double-edged sword. Instead of readily immunizing artistic use against trademark claims, it obliges artists to rely on limitations of trademark rights and furnish corresponding proof. Moreover, artists are expected to align their artistic activity with behavioural standards in the field of industry and commerce – a realm that is alien to the artistic community. Evidently, this approach endangers artistic autonomy. To avoid detrimental effects on artistic expression, it is advisable to strengthen the position of artists and develop a legal solution that resembles the measures taken in Art. 9(3)(f) EUTMR and Art. 10(3)(f) TMD with regard to freedom of commercial expression. Drawing inspiration from cultural sciences and case law on both sides of the Atlantic, the analysis explores avenues for achieving this goal.

Links

DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01182-x

Merkenrecht

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Senftleben, M.
PY  - 0412
DA  - 2022-04-12
T1  - Robustness Check: Evaluating and Strengthening Artistic Use Defences in EU Trademark Law
JO  - IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 
VL  - 53
NV  - 4
SP  - 567-603
DO  - https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01182-x
AB  - The 2015 EU trademark law reform introduced a peculiar rule for reconciling trademark rights with freedom of artistic expression. According to Recital 21 EUTMR and Recital 27 TMD, artistic use can be deemed fair as long as the artist ensures compliance with “honest practices in industrial and commercial matters”. The honest practices proviso forges a link with the provisions on limitations of trademark rights. Article 14(1) EUTMR and Art. 14(1) TMD exempt from the control of trademark proprietors several types of use that can allow for artistic use. All these limitations, however, apply only when the use satisfies the test of honest practices. Confirming the obligation to comply with honest practices in industrial and commercial matters, the fairness rule of Recital 21 EUTMR and Recital 27 TMD turns out to be a double-edged sword. Instead of readily immunizing artistic use against trademark claims, it obliges artists to rely on limitations of trademark rights and furnish corresponding proof. Moreover, artists are expected to align their artistic activity with behavioural standards in the field of industry and commerce – a realm that is alien to the artistic community. Evidently, this approach endangers artistic autonomy. To avoid detrimental effects on artistic expression, it is advisable to strengthen the position of artists and develop a legal solution that resembles the measures taken in Art. 9(3)(f) EUTMR and Art. 10(3)(f) TMD with regard to freedom of commercial expression. Drawing inspiration from cultural sciences and case law on both sides of the Atlantic, the analysis explores avenues for achieving this goal.
K1  - Merkenrecht
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Article{nokey,
	title = {Robustness Check: Evaluating and Strengthening Artistic Use Defences in EU Trademark Law},
	author = {Senftleben, M.},
	doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01182-x},
	year = {0412},
	date = {2022-04-12},
	journal = {IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law },
	volume = {53},
	number = {4},
	pages = {567-603},
	abstract = {The 2015 EU trademark law reform introduced a peculiar rule for reconciling trademark rights with freedom of artistic expression. According to Recital 21 EUTMR and Recital 27 TMD, artistic use can be deemed fair as long as the artist ensures compliance with “honest practices in industrial and commercial matters”. The honest practices proviso forges a link with the provisions on limitations of trademark rights. Article 14(1) EUTMR and Art. 14(1) TMD exempt from the control of trademark proprietors several types of use that can allow for artistic use. All these limitations, however, apply only when the use satisfies the test of honest practices. Confirming the obligation to comply with honest practices in industrial and commercial matters, the fairness rule of Recital 21 EUTMR and Recital 27 TMD turns out to be a double-edged sword. Instead of readily immunizing artistic use against trademark claims, it obliges artists to rely on limitations of trademark rights and furnish corresponding proof. Moreover, artists are expected to align their artistic activity with behavioural standards in the field of industry and commerce – a realm that is alien to the artistic community. Evidently, this approach endangers artistic autonomy. To avoid detrimental effects on artistic expression, it is advisable to strengthen the position of artists and develop a legal solution that resembles the measures taken in Art. 9(3)(f) EUTMR and Art. 10(3)(f) TMD with regard to freedom of commercial expression. Drawing inspiration from cultural sciences and case law on both sides of the Atlantic, the analysis explores avenues for achieving this goal.},
	keywords = {Merkenrecht},
}

Save .bib

Knock Knock Who’s There? Tussenpersonen, persoonsgegevens en de kunst van het juiste evenwicht external link

Alberdingk Thijm, Chr. A.

Ars Aequi, iss. : april, pp: 279-288, 2022

Abstract

Wat te doen als je op Twitter door een anoniem profiel voor rotte vis wordt uitgemaakt? Het Nederlandse recht biedt verschillende mogelijkheden om identificerende gegevens te verkrijgen van internettussenpersonen. Maar hoe wordt de afweging met de bescherming van de persoonsgegevens van de anonymus gemaakt? Hoe verhoudt het recht op een doeltreffende voorziening in rechte zich tot het gegevensbeschermingsrecht? Het Hof van Justitie schrijft voor dat bij botsende fundamentele rechten het ‘juiste evenwicht’ moet worden gevonden. Dat blijkt de Nederlandse rechter nog niet zo eenvoudig te vinden, zo wordt duidelijk bij de bespreking van het Dutch FilmWorks-arrest in dit artikel.

frontpage, persoonsgevens, Privacy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Article{nokey,
	title = {Knock Knock Who’s There? Tussenpersonen, persoonsgegevens en de kunst van het juiste evenwicht},
	author = {Alberdingk Thijm, Chr. A.},
	year = {0408},
	date = {2022-04-08},
	journal = {Ars Aequi},
	issue = {april},
	pages = {279-288},
	abstract = {Wat te doen als je op Twitter door een anoniem profiel voor rotte vis wordt uitgemaakt? Het Nederlandse recht biedt verschillende mogelijkheden om identificerende gegevens te verkrijgen van internettussenpersonen. Maar hoe wordt de afweging met de bescherming van de persoonsgegevens van de anonymus gemaakt? Hoe verhoudt het recht op een doeltreffende voorziening in rechte zich tot het gegevensbeschermingsrecht? Het Hof van Justitie schrijft voor dat bij botsende
fundamentele rechten het ‘juiste evenwicht’ moet worden gevonden. Dat blijkt de Nederlandse rechter nog niet zo eenvoudig te vinden, zo wordt duidelijk bij de bespreking van het Dutch FilmWorks-arrest in dit artikel.},
	keywords = {frontpage, persoonsgevens, Privacy},
}

Save .bib

Online prijsdiscriminatie: heeft iedereen zijn prijs? external link

Poort, J. & Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.

2022

frontpage, online prijsdiscriminatie

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Top Keywords

RIS

Bibtex

RIS

Bibtex

RIS

Bibtex

RIS

Bibtex

RIS

Bibtex

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

RIS

Bibtex

RIS

Bibtex