Mediawet 2008 external link

Kroes, Q. & Hins, A.
pp: 811-846., 2015

Mediarecht, mediawet

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Zo’n huisbezoek is niet zo onschuldig als het lijkt external link

2016

Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

EHRM geeft voorrang aan bescherming van persoonsgegevens external link

Mediaforum, num: 1, pp: 19-21., 2016

Grondrechten, Privacy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Annotatie bij EHRM 20 oktober 2015 (Pentikäinen / Finland) external link

European Human Rights Cases, num: 3, 2016

Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Towards Author’s Paradise: The new Dutch Act on Authors’ Contracts external link

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Singling out people without knowing their names – Behavioural targeting, pseudonymous data, and the new data protection regulation external link

Computer Law & Security Review, num: 2, pp: 256-271., 2016

Abstract

Information about millions of people is collected for behavioural targeting, a type of marketing that involves tracking people’s online behaviour for targeted advertising. It is hotly debated whether data protection law applies to behavioural targeting. Many behavioural targeting companies say that, as long as they do not tie names to data they hold about individuals, they do not process any personal data, and that, therefore, data protection law does not apply to them. European Data Protection Authorities, however, take the view that a company processes personal data if it uses data to single out a person, even if it cannot tie a name to these data. This paper argues that data protection law should indeed apply to behavioural targeting. Companies can often tie a name to nameless data about individuals. Furthermore, behavioural targeting relies on collecting information about individuals, singling out individuals, and targeting ads to individuals. Many privacy risks remain, regardless of whether companies tie a name to the information they hold about a person. A name is merely one of the identifiers that can be tied to data about a person, and it is not even the most practical identifier for behavioural targeting. Seeing data used to single out a person as personal data fits the rationale for data protection law: protecting fairness and privacy.

behavioural targeting, cookies, Data protection law, IP addresses, online behavioural advertising, Personal data, Privacy, profiling, pseudonymous data, tracking

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

“Onafhankelijkheid publieke omroep moet beter worden geborgd” external link

Broadcast Magazine, num: 2, pp: 46-47., 2016

Mediarecht, Omroeprecht

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Bijdrage Rondetafelgesprek 11 februari 2016: Computercriminaliteit III external link

Technologie en recht

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Het prinsesje onder de grondrechten external link

Privacy & Informatie, num: 6, pp: 215., 2016

Grondrechten

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

IE vincit omnia? Opsporing in de particuliere sector. external link

AMI, num: 6, pp: 176-180., 2016

Abstract

Bevel aan Google tot afgifte ex. art. 28 lid 9 Aw van persoons- en adresgegevens van de houder van een Google Play account vanwege onrechtmatige verkoop van e-books. Voorwaarde dat de houder op grond van art. 40 Wbp verzet kan aantekenen tegen die afgifte bij de verantwoordelijke (Google). Grondrechtenconflict bescherming van eigendom, vrijheid van meningsuiting en privacy.

Grondrechten, Privacy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib