The Practical and Theoretical Problems with ‘Balancing’: Delfi, Coty and the Redundancy of the Human Rights Framework external link

Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, num: 3, pp: 439-459., 2016

Abstract

In the realm of privacy and data protection – as in the fundamental rights framework in general – balancing has become the standard approach for dealing with legal disputes. It comes, however, with a number of practical and theoretical problems. Th is article analyses those problems and compares the method of balancing with the original approach of most human rights frameworks, such as the European Convention on Human Rights. It does so by analysing two cases in detail: the European Court of Human Right’s case Delfi v. Estonia and the Court of Justice of the EU’s judgment Coty v. Stadtsparkasse. From this analysis, it follows that the concept of balancing signals a shift away from the deontological and towards a utilitarian understanding of fundamental rights. Th is is not only of theoretical importance, as it could also mean that in time, human rights frameworks as such might become redundant.

balancing, consequentialism, Data protection, frontpage, Mensenrechten, Miscellaneous, Privacy, utilitarianism

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Annotatie bij EHRM 19 januari 2016 (Kalda / Estland) external link

European Human Rights Cases, num: 6, 2016

Abstract

De zaak Kalda t. Estland betreft het recht op gedeeltelijke toegang tot het internet van een levenslang gestrafte gevangene. Het gaat hierbij met name om een drietal websites die toegang bieden tot wetgeving, juridische informatie en uitspraken (en vertalingen daarvan) van rechterlijke instanties. Het EHRM stelt in deze zaak dat een dergelijk recht inderdaad wordt beschermd door art. 10 EVRM. Alhoewel de beperking van dit recht in casu is voorgeschreven bij wet en een legitiem doel dient, acht het Hof deze niet noodzakelijk in een democratische samenleving.

Criminal law, frontpage, Grondrechten, Strafrecht, toegang tot websites gevangene, vrijheid van informatie, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Is Tax Data Sensitive Data? Case note GSB v. Switzerland, ECHR 22 December 2015 external link

European Data Protection Law Review, num: 2, pp: 262-265., 2016

frontpage, Grondrechten, Privacy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Editorial external link

European Data Protection Law Review, num: 2, pp: 145-147., 2016

frontpage, Grondrechten, Privacy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Trade and privacy: complicated bedfellows? How to achieve data protection-proof free trade agreements external link

Irion, K., Yakovleva, S. & Bartl, M.
2016

Abstract

Study commissioned by the European Consumer Organisation/Bureau Européen des Unions de Consommateurs (BEUC), Center for Digital Democracy (CDD), The Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue (TACD) and European Digital Rights (EDRi), 13 July 2016, Amsterdam. The results of the study were widely covered in the Dutch and European media: ‘Privacy onvoldoende gewaarborgd in handelsverdragen EU‘, nu.nl, 13 juli 2016 ‘EU stelt privacy burgers onvoldoende veilig‘, Digital Telegraaf, 13 juli 2016 ‘EU stelt privacy burgers onvoldoende veilig‘, Einhovens Dagblad, 13 juli 2016 Monika Ermert, ‘Transatlantischer Zoff: Digitaler Datenschutz oder digitaler Protektionismus?‘, 16 July 2016, heise.de Léa Auffret, ‘Why privacy safeguards in trade deals need urgent improvement‘, 20 October 2016, beuc.eu

frontpage, Grondrechten, Privacy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Chefsache: Bestuurders aansprakelijk na ernstige cyberaanval external link

2016

Bescherming van communicatie, frontpage, Grondrechten

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Nieuw toezicht: Stortvloed aan data schreeuwt om ingrijpen external link

2016

Bescherming van communicatie, frontpage, Grondrechten

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Securing Private Communications: Protecting Private Communications Security in EU Law – Fundamental Rights, Functional Value Chains and Market Incentives external link

Kluwer Law International, 2016, Series: Information Law Series, ISBN: 9789041167378

Abstract

Securing Private Communications. Protecting Private Communications Security in EU Law – Fundamental Rights, Functional Value Chains and Market Incentives, offers a conceptual and legislative toolkit that helps in building a step-by-step regulatory model in EU law. This book argues for a stricter stance on protecting private communications security. Increasingly, it has become clear that any communicative act online is subject to breach by intelligence agencies, cybercriminals, advertising networks, employers, and corporate data miners, to mention the most obvious intruders. Internet users, seeing no other choice than to hop onto the web-based bandwagon, have come to depend on a networked communications environment that is fundamentally insecure. Now lawmakers, worldwide, are gearing up to intervene. This book provides a comprehensive overview of the current European regulatory framework on communications security and offers a multidisciplinary study on EU communications security law. The history of the past 25 years of EU communications security law is analyzed in-depth. The regulatory model proposed is tested on HTTPS, which covers the user–provider relationship in web browsing, and on ‘cloud’ communications that affect interdomain and intradomain communications. Case studies included in the book are based on the infamous DigiNotar breach and the MUSCULAR program, disclosed by whistle-blower Edward Snowden, and contain original legal, security economic, and computer science research, conducted jointly with scholars trained in these disciplines.

Fundamental rights, Information security, Kluwer Information Law Series

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Netherlands: New Notification Obligations and Fines under the Dutch Data Protection Act external link

European Data Protection Law Review, vol. 2, num: 2, pp: 224-226, 2016

frontpage, Grondrechten, Privacy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Annotatie bij EHRM 4 december 2015 (Roman Zakharov/Rusland) external link

Computerrecht, vol. 2016, num: 3, pp: 178-189, 2016

frontpage, Grondrechten, Privacy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib