Publications
Top Keywords
- AI Act (11)
- Art. 10 EVRM (26)
- Art. 17 CDSM Directive (13)
- Artificial intelligence (85)
- Big data (12)
- Constitutional and administrative law (11)
- Consumer law (11)
- Content moderation (22)
- Copyright (217)
- Cybersecurity (10)
- Data protection (29)
- Data protection law (11)
- Digital Services Act (DSA) (34)
- Digital Single Market (13)
- EU (19)
- EU law (25)
- Europe (13)
- Fake news (14)
- Freedom of expression (51)
- Fundamental rights (21)
- GDPR (22)
- Human rights (31)
- Intellectual property (31)
- Internet (24)
- Journalism (18)
- Kluwer Information Law Series (43)
- Licensing (14)
- Media law (37)
- Online platforms (20)
- Patent law (20)
- Personal data (35)
- Platforms (24)
- Privacy (327)
- Regulation (14)
- Social media (12)
- Software (10)
- Surveillance (11)
- Text and Data Mining (TDM) (21)
- Trademark law (16)
- Transparency (19)
Book Review: The Crisis of Presence in Contemporary Culture external link
Links
book review, Data protection, ethics, phenomenology, presence, Privacy, property
RIS
Bibtex
Online Price Discrimination and EU Data Privacy Law external link
Abstract
Online shops could offer each website customer a different price. Such personalized pricing can lead to advanced forms of price discrimination based on individual characteristics of consumers, which may be provided, obtained, or assumed. An online shop can recognize customers, for instance through cookies, and categorize them as price-sensitive or price-insensitive. Subsequently, it can charge (presumed) price-insensitive people higher prices. This paper explores personalized pricing from a
legal and an economic perspective. From an economic perspective, there are valid arguments in favour of price discrimination, but its effect on total consumer welfare is ambiguous. Irrespectively, many people regard personalized pricing as unfair or
manipulative. The paper analyses how this dislike of personalized pricing may be linked to economic analysis and to other norms or values. Next, the paper examines whether European data protection law applies to personalized pricing. Data protection law applies if personal data are processed, and this paper argues that that is generally the case when prices are personalized. Data protection law requires companies to be transparent about the purpose of personal data processing, which implies that they must inform customers if they personalize prices. Subsequently, consumers have to give consent. If enforced, data protection law could thereby play a significant role in mitigating any adverse effects of personalized pricing. It could help to unearth how prevalent personalized pricing is and how people respond to transparency about it.
Links
behavioural targeting, cookies, Data protection law, frontpage, General Data Protection Regulation, personalized communication, Price discrimination
RIS
Bibtex
China’s new cybersecurity law – effective as of 1 June 2017 external link
Abstract
While China’s new cybersecurity law may appear vague, cumbersome and lacking clarity, one thing is clear and that is that international companies with any operations and/or activities in China should quickly assess if and how they are covered by the new legislation.
China, Cybersecurity
RIS
Bibtex
Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 14 februari 2017 (Mein Kampf) external link
Abstract
Verspreiding antiquarisch exemplaar Mein Kampf valt wel onder 137e 2e Sr, maar is niet strafbaar omdat de beperking in strijd komt met artikel 10 EVRM.
artikel 10 EVRM, frontpage, mein kampf, Strafrecht, Vrijheid van meningsuiting
RIS
Bibtex
Compilation of selected best practices for the implementation of Recommendation CM/Rec(2016)4 & Proposals for further follow-up activities external link
Conference conclusions and reflections external link
Abstract
European Centre for Press and Media Freedom, the Council of Europe and other partners, Strasbourg, 24 March 2017.
Video recording, Part 2, EN, starting at 3.05.20.
conference, frontpage, media freedom, Mediarecht
RIS
Bibtex
Conference conclusions external link
Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 31 maart 2017 (Rabobank / Stichting Restschuld Eerlijk Delen) external link
Abstract
Privacy werknemers bij een kritische publicatie over het bedrijf waar zij werkzaam zijn. Recht op anonimiteit?
anonimiteit, frontpage, Privacy, werknemers
RIS
Bibtex
Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 24 februari 2017 (X / Google Netherlands) external link
Abstract
In zijn arrest laat de Hoge Raad zich uit over hoe de rechten op privacy en gegevensbescherming zich verhouden tot het recht op vrijheid van meningsuiting.
annotatie, frontpage, gegevensbescherming, Privacy, Vrijheid van meningsuiting