Publications
Top Keywords
- AI Act (11)
- Art. 10 EVRM (26)
- Art. 17 CDSM Directive (13)
- Artificial intelligence (85)
- Big data (12)
- Constitutional and administrative law (11)
- Consumer law (11)
- Content moderation (22)
- Copyright (217)
- Cybersecurity (10)
- Data protection (29)
- Data protection law (11)
- Digital Services Act (DSA) (34)
- Digital Single Market (13)
- EU (19)
- EU law (25)
- Europe (13)
- Fake news (14)
- Freedom of expression (51)
- Fundamental rights (21)
- GDPR (22)
- Human rights (31)
- Intellectual property (31)
- Internet (24)
- Journalism (18)
- Kluwer Information Law Series (43)
- Licensing (14)
- Media law (37)
- Online platforms (20)
- Patent law (20)
- Personal data (35)
- Platforms (24)
- Privacy (327)
- Regulation (14)
- Social media (12)
- Software (10)
- Surveillance (11)
- Text and Data Mining (TDM) (21)
- Trademark law (16)
- Transparency (19)
Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 19 oktober 2016 (Breyer, C-2016/779) external link
Abstract
Is een 'dynamisch' IP adres een persoonsgegeven?
Verzoek om een prejudiciële beslissing ingediend door het Bundesgerichtshof (hoogste federale rechter in burgerlijke en strafzaken, Duitsland) bij beslissing van 28 oktober 2014.
Verwerking van persoonsgegevens. Begrip, persoonsgegevens’. Internetprotocoladressen. Bewaring door een aanbieder van onlinemediadiensten. Nationale regeling volgens welke geen rekening kan worden gehouden met het gerechtvaardigde belang van de voor de verwerking verantwoordelijke persoon.
Annotaties, frontpage, ip adressen, Personal data, Privacy
RIS
Bibtex
Should Fundamental Rights to Privacy and Data Protection be a Part of the EU’s International Trade "Deals"? external link
Abstract
This article discusses ways in which the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and post-GATS free trade agreements may limit the EU's ability to regulate privacy and personal data protection as fundamental rights. After discussing this issue in two dimensions – the vertical relationship between trade and national and European Union (EU) law, and the horizontal relationship between trade and human rights law – the author concludes that these limits are real and pose serious risks.
Inspired by recent developments in safeguarding labour, and environmental standards and sustainable development, the article argues that privacy and personal data protection should be part of, and protected by, international trade deals made by the EU. The EU should negotiate future international trade agreements with the objective of allowing them to reflect the normative foundations of privacy and personal data protection. This article suggests a specific way to achieve this objective.
Links
Data protection, European Union, frontpage, Fundamental rights, international trade, Privacy
RIS
Bibtex
Challenged by news personalisation: five perspectives on the right to receive information external link
Abstract
This research asks what the right to receive information means for personalised news consumers and the obligations this rights imposes on states. We develop a framework to understand the right to receive information, starting from case law of the European Court of Human Rights. On this basis, we identify five perspectives on the right to receive information: political debate, truth finding, social cohesion, avoidance of censorship and self-development. We evaluate how these five perspectives inform a legal and policy analysis of news personalisation.
European Convention on Human Rights, filter bubbles, frontpage, media diversity, Media law, news personalisation, right to receive information
RIS
Bibtex
Referendum ‘sleepnetwet’ voorbode digitale perikelen Rutte III: D66 zal achterban herhaaldelijk moeten teleurstellen rond digitale dossiers external link
Ziekenhuizen en energiebedrijven gaan wellicht boeten voor beveiligingsfouten: Nieuwe IT-wet bedoeld om ‘potentiële maatschappelijke ontwrichting’ te voorkomen external link
beveiliging, Cybersecurity, energiebedrijven, it, nederland, Privacy, ransomware, Telecommunicatierecht, toezicht, wetgeving, ziekenhuizen
RIS
Bibtex
AG Szpunar on VCAST: Copyright and the Cloud external link
Abstract
On 7 September 2017, AG Szpunar delivered his opinion on Case C-265/16, VCAST. The case concerns the question of whether the private copying exception covers the services of an online platform that allows users to store copies of free-to-air TV programmes in private cloud storage spaces. AG Szpunar’s proposed answer was a mixed one: while cloud copying, in general, should be considered covered by the exception, the specific service offered by VCAST should not.
Case notes, Copyright, frontpage, online platform, private copying exception
RIS
Bibtex
Tracking walls, take-it-or-leave-it choices, the GDPR, and the ePrivacy regulation external link
Abstract
On the internet, we encounter take-it-or-leave-it choices regarding our privacy on a daily basis. In Europe, online tracking for targeted advertising generally requires the internet users’ consent to be lawful. Some websites use a tracking wall, a barrier that visitors can only pass if they consent to tracking by third parties. When confronted with such a tracking wall, many people click ‘I agree’ to tracking. A survey that we conducted shows that most people find tracking walls unfair and unacceptable. We analyse under which conditions the ePrivacy Directive and the General Data Protection Regulation allow tracking walls. We provide a list of circumstances to assess when a tracking wall makes consent invalid. We also explore how the EU lawmaker could regulate tracking walls, for instance in the ePrivacy Regulation. It should be seriously considered to ban tracking walls, at least in certain circumstances.
Links
europe, frontpage, GDPR, Privacy, tracking walls
RIS
Bibtex
Unfair Commercial Practices: A Complementary Approach to Privacy Protection external link
Abstract
Millions of European internet users access online platforms where their personal data is being collected, processed, analysed or sold. The existence of some of the largest online platforms is entirely based on data driven business models. In the European Union, the protection of personal data is considered a fundamental right. Under Article 8(3) of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, compliance with data protection rules should be subject to control by an independent authority. In the EU, enforcement of privacy rules almost solely takes place by the national data protection authorities. They typically apply sector-specific rules, based on the EU Data Protection Directive. In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission is the primary enforcer of consumers’ (online) privacy interests. The agency’s competence is not based on the protection of fundamental rights, but on the basis that maintenance of a competitive, fair marketplace will provide the right choices for consumers to take. In this Article the US legal framework will be discussed and compared to the EU legal framework, which forms our finding that in the EU rules on unfair commercial practices could be enforced in a similar manner to protect people’s privacy. In the EU, the many frictions concerning the market/consumer-oriented use of personal data form a good reason to actually deal with these frictions in a market/consumer legal framework.
Links
frontpage, Fundamental rights, Online platforms, Personal data, Privacy, unfair commercial practices
RIS
Bibtex
About finding practical solutions (without the GDPR) external link
Links
frontpage, GDPR, Privacy, privacy bridges