Over wetgeving, implementatie en beleid – Kroniek van het auteursrecht in Nederland 2010-2016

Over wetgeving, implementatie en beleid – Kroniek van het auteursrecht in Nederland 2010-2016 external link

van Gompel, S.

Auteurs & Media, vol. 2016, num: 3, pp: 250-258, 2017

Abstract

Het is alweer zes jaar geleden dat de laatste kroniek over het Nederlands auteursrecht in Auteurs & Media is gepubliceerd(1). Hoog tijd dus om de draad op te pakken en de stok van mijn illustere voorganger over te nemen. Deze kroniek bespreekt de belangrijkste ontwikkelingen op het gebied van auteursrechtwetgeving en -beleid in Nederland in de afgelopen zes jaren, waaronder de introductie van het auteurscontractenrecht, de afschaffing van geschriftenbescherming, de versterking van het toezicht op collectieve beheersorganisaties en de implementatie van de Richtlijnen 2012/28/EU (verweesde werken) en 2011/77/EU (verlenging beschermingsduur naburige rechten). Door deze nieuwe wetgeving is de Nederlandse Auteurswet (Aw) en Wet op de naburige rechten (Wnr) op diverse plaatsen aangepast.

Links

https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AuteursMedia_2016_3.pdf

Auteursrecht, beleid, frontpage, kroniek, wetgeving

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - van Gompel, S.
PY  - 1010
DA  - 2017-10-10
T1  - Over wetgeving, implementatie en beleid – Kroniek van het auteursrecht in Nederland 2010-2016
JO  - Auteurs & Media
VL  - 2016
NV  - 3
SP  - 250-258
UR  - https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AuteursMedia_2016_3.pdf
AB  - Het is alweer zes jaar geleden dat de laatste kroniek over het Nederlands auteursrecht in Auteurs & Media is
gepubliceerd(1). Hoog tijd dus om de draad op te pakken en de stok van mijn illustere voorganger over te nemen. Deze
kroniek bespreekt de belangrijkste ontwikkelingen op het gebied van auteursrechtwetgeving en -beleid in Nederland in de
afgelopen zes jaren, waaronder de introductie van het auteurscontractenrecht, de afschaffing van geschriftenbescherming,
de versterking van het toezicht op collectieve beheersorganisaties en de implementatie van de Richtlijnen 2012/28/EU
(verweesde werken) en 2011/77/EU (verlenging beschermingsduur naburige rechten). Door deze nieuwe wetgeving is de
Nederlandse Auteurswet (Aw) en Wet op de naburige rechten (Wnr) op diverse plaatsen aangepast.
K1  - Auteursrecht
K1  - beleid
K1  - frontpage
K1  - kroniek
K1  - wetgeving
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Article{vanGompel2017b,
	title = {Over wetgeving, implementatie en beleid – Kroniek van het auteursrecht in Nederland 2010-2016},
	author = {van Gompel, S.},
	year = {1010},
	date = {2017-10-10},
	journal = {Auteurs & Media},
	volume = {2016},
	number = {3},
	pages = {250-258},
	abstract = {Het is alweer zes jaar geleden dat de laatste kroniek over het Nederlands auteursrecht in Auteurs & Media is
gepubliceerd(1). Hoog tijd dus om de draad op te pakken en de stok van mijn illustere voorganger over te nemen. Deze
kroniek bespreekt de belangrijkste ontwikkelingen op het gebied van auteursrechtwetgeving en -beleid in Nederland in de
afgelopen zes jaren, waaronder de introductie van het auteurscontractenrecht, de afschaffing van geschriftenbescherming,
de versterking van het toezicht op collectieve beheersorganisaties en de implementatie van de Richtlijnen 2012/28/EU
(verweesde werken) en 2011/77/EU (verlenging beschermingsduur naburige rechten). Door deze nieuwe wetgeving is de
Nederlandse Auteurswet (Aw) en Wet op de naburige rechten (Wnr) op diverse plaatsen aangepast.},
	keywords = {Auteursrecht, beleid, frontpage, kroniek, wetgeving},
}

Save .bib

Report of the Netherlands for ALAI 2017 Study Days (Copenhagen) external link

van Gompel, S. & Schaik, R. van

2017

Links

https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/ReportoftheNetherlands_ALAI_2017.pdf

Auteursrecht, frontpage

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie 1 maart 2017 (ITV / TVCatchup II) external link

van Gompel, S.

AMI, vol. 2017, num: 3, pp: 135-137, 2017

Links

https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_AMI_2017_3.pdf

Auteursrecht, frontpage, omroep, toegang tot de kabel

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

The perfect match? A closer look at the relationship between EU consumer law and data protection law external link

Helberger, N., Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. & Reyna, A.

Common Market Law Review, vol. 2017, num: 5, pp: 1427-1466, 2017

Abstract

In modern markets, many companies offer so-called “free” services and monetize consumer data they collect through those services. This paper argues that consumer law and data protection law can usefully complement each other. Data protection law can also inform the interpretation of consumer law. Using consumer rights, consumers should be able to challenge excessive collection of their personal data. Consumer organizations have used consumer law to tackle data protection infringements. The interplay of data protection law and consumer protection law provides exciting opportunities for a more integrated vision on “data consumer law”.

Links

https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/CMLR_2017_5.pdf

Consumentenrecht, Consumer law, Data protection law, EU, frontpage, gegevensbescherming, Privacy

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Helberger, N.
AU  - Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.
AU  - Reyna, A.
PY  - 1006
DA  - 2017-10-06
T1  - The perfect match? A closer look at the relationship between EU consumer law and data protection law
JO  - Common Market Law Review
VL  - 2017
NV  - 5
SP  - 1427-1466
UR  - https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/CMLR_2017_5.pdf
AB  - In modern markets, many companies offer so-called “free” services and monetize consumer data they collect through those services. This paper argues that consumer law and data protection law can usefully complement each other. Data protection law can also inform the interpretation of consumer law. Using consumer rights, consumers should be able to challenge excessive collection of their personal data. Consumer organizations have used consumer law to tackle data protection infringements. The interplay of data protection law and consumer protection law provides exciting opportunities for a more integrated vision on “data consumer law”.
K1  - Consumentenrecht
K1  - Consumer law
K1  - Data protection law
K1  - EU
K1  - frontpage
K1  - gegevensbescherming
K1  - Privacy
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Article{Helberger2017b,
	title = {The perfect match? A closer look at the relationship between EU consumer law and data protection law},
	author = {Helberger, N. and Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. and Reyna, A.},
	year = {1006},
	date = {2017-10-06},
	journal = {Common Market Law Review},
	volume = {2017},
	number = {5},
	pages = {1427-1466},
	abstract = {In modern markets, many companies offer so-called “free” services and monetize consumer data they collect through those services. This paper argues that consumer law and data protection law can usefully complement each other. Data protection law can also inform the interpretation of consumer law. Using consumer rights, consumers should be able to challenge excessive collection of their personal data. Consumer organizations have used consumer law to tackle data protection infringements. The interplay of data protection law and consumer protection law provides exciting opportunities for a more integrated vision on “data consumer law”.},
	keywords = {Consumentenrecht, Consumer law, Data protection law, EU, frontpage, gegevensbescherming, Privacy},
}

Save .bib

Literature review on the use of licensing in library context, and the limitations this creates to access to knowledge external link

Yakovleva, S.

vol. 2017, 2017

Abstract

The dual purpose of this literature review is, first, to identify and summarise limitations that result from the use of copyright licences in a library context, and, second, to illustrate these limitations with specific examples available in both the academic and grey literature. The licences discussed in the reviewed literature deal essentially with access to, and use of, digital content.

Links

https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/limits_of_licensing_literature_review.pdf

access to knowledge, Copyright, frontpage, libraries, Licensing

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

A Roadmap to Enhancing User Control via Privacy Dashboards external link

Irion, K., Yakovleva, S., van Hoboken, J. & Thompson, M.

2017

Abstract

This report presents and draws on multidisciplinary insights into what characterises effective user control over the collection and use of personal data. User controls arise from the interplay of a number of conditions. These are partly technical but also connected to different aspects of user behaviour, the intricacies of design, as well as the internal and external incentives in privacy governance that exist today. Our review of the state of research underscores that devising effective user controls require close collaboration between different disciplines, clear regulatory guidance and scientifically-backed assessments.

Links

https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/PrivacyBridgesUserControls2017.pdf

frontpage, Privacy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Estimating displacement rates of copyrighted content in the EU external link

Ende, M. van der, Poort, J., Haffner, R., Bas, P. de, Yagafarova, A., Rohlfs, S. & Til, H. van

2017

Abstract

The extent to which digital consumption of pirated materials displaces legitimate purchases is of fundamental importance for EU copyright policy design. The European Commission has commissioned Ecorys to carry out a study on the relation between online copyright infringement (digital piracy) and sales of copyrighted content. This study adds to the existing literature in at least three ways. Firstly, it compares piracy rates in multiple EU Member States calculated according to the same methodology. This makes it possible to compare results between countries. Secondly, displacement rates are estimated in the presence of an important recent phenomenon, i.e. the widespread availability of a wide variety of services for downloading or streaming content. Thirdly, the study includes minors to assess the extent of piracy among this group.

Links

Auteursrecht, Copyright, copyright policy, frontpage, online content, Online copright enforcement, online infringement, Online media

RIS

TY  - RPRT
AU  - Ende, M. van der
AU  - Poort, J.
AU  - Haffner, R.
AU  - Bas, P. de
AU  - Yagafarova, A.
AU  - Rohlfs, S.
AU  - Til, H. van
PY  - 0922
DA  - 2017-09-22
T1  - Estimating displacement rates of copyrighted content in the EU
UR  - https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/2015-Estimating-displacement-rates-of-copyrighted-content-in-the-EU-2.pdf
DO  - https://doi.org/10.2780/26736
AB  - The extent to which digital consumption of pirated materials displaces legitimate purchases is of fundamental importance for EU copyright policy design. The European Commission has commissioned Ecorys to carry out a study on the relation between online copyright infringement (digital piracy) and sales of copyrighted content.

This study adds to the existing literature in at least three ways. Firstly, it compares piracy rates in multiple EU Member States calculated according to the same methodology. This makes it possible to compare results between countries. Secondly, displacement rates are estimated in the presence of an important recent phenomenon, i.e. the widespread availability of a wide variety of services for downloading or streaming content. Thirdly, the study includes minors to assess the extent of piracy among this group.
K1  - Auteursrecht
K1  - Copyright
K1  - copyright policy
K1  - frontpage
K1  - online content
K1  - Online copright enforcement
K1  - online infringement
K1  - Online media
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Report{Ecorys&Poort-Displacement,
	title = {Estimating displacement rates of copyrighted content in the EU},
	author = {Ende, M. van der and Poort, J. and Haffner, R. and Bas, P. de and Yagafarova, A. and Rohlfs, S. and Til, H. van},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.2780/26736},
	year = {0922},
	date = {2017-09-22},
	abstract = {The extent to which digital consumption of pirated materials displaces legitimate purchases is of fundamental importance for EU copyright policy design. The European Commission has commissioned Ecorys to carry out a study on the relation between online copyright infringement (digital piracy) and sales of copyrighted content.

This study adds to the existing literature in at least three ways. Firstly, it compares piracy rates in multiple EU Member States calculated according to the same methodology. This makes it possible to compare results between countries. Secondly, displacement rates are estimated in the presence of an important recent phenomenon, i.e. the widespread availability of a wide variety of services for downloading or streaming content. Thirdly, the study includes minors to assess the extent of piracy among this group.},
	keywords = {Auteursrecht, Copyright, copyright policy, frontpage, online content, Online copright enforcement, online infringement, Online media},
}

Save .bib

The freely given consent and the "bundling" provision under the GDPR external link

Kostić, B. & Vargas Penagos, E.

Computerrecht, vol. 2017, num: 4, pp: 217-222, 2017

Abstract

Under European data protection law, consent of the data subject is one of the six grounds for lawful processing of personal data. It is such an important ground that lawmakers considered it necessary to provide a legal definition of consent. One of the conditions under this definition is that it needs to be “freely given.” The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) 3 has further expanded on this concept in Article 7(4). It refers to a situation under which consent might not be considered “freely given.” If consent is invalid because it is not freely given, the processing is usually unlawful. Consequently, a legal basis for processing is missing. Therefore, this is an important provision. Yet the wording of this new provision is vague and its scope is unclear. Thus, the question arises as to how Article 7(4) should be applied. In this paper, the authors tease out the assessment criteria for the application of this provision on the basis of its text, structure and history. These criteria will then be applied to hypothetical cases in the final section.

Links

https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Computerrecht_2017_4.pdf

bundling, consent, frontpage, General Data Protection Regulation, Privacy

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kostić, B.
AU  - Vargas Penagos, E.
PY  - 0915
DA  - 2017-09-15
T1  - The freely given consent and the "bundling" provision under the GDPR
JO  - Computerrecht
VL  - 2017
NV  - 4
SP  - 217-222
UR  - https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Computerrecht_2017_4.pdf
AB  - Under European data protection law, consent of the data subject is one of the six grounds for lawful processing of personal data. It is such an important ground that lawmakers considered it necessary to provide a legal definition of consent. One of the conditions under this definition is that it needs to be “freely given.” The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) 3 has further expanded on this concept in Article 7(4). It refers to a situation under which consent might not be considered “freely given.” If consent is invalid because it is not freely given, the processing is usually unlawful. Consequently, a legal basis for processing is missing. Therefore, this is an important provision. Yet the wording of this new provision is vague and its scope is unclear. Thus, the question arises as to how Article 7(4) should be applied. In this paper, the authors tease out the assessment criteria for the application of this provision on the basis of its text, structure and history. These criteria will then be applied to hypothetical cases in the final section.
K1  - bundling
K1  - consent
K1  - frontpage
K1  - General Data Protection Regulation
K1  - Privacy
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Article{Kostić2017,
	title = {The freely given consent and the "bundling" provision under the GDPR},
	author = {Kostić, B. and Vargas Penagos, E.},
	year = {0915},
	date = {2017-09-15},
	journal = {Computerrecht},
	volume = {2017},
	number = {4},
	pages = {217-222},
	abstract = {Under European data protection law, consent of the data subject is one of the six grounds for lawful processing of personal data. It is such an important ground that lawmakers considered it necessary to provide a legal definition of consent. One of the conditions under this definition is that it needs to be “freely given.” The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) 3 has further expanded on this concept in Article 7(4). It refers to a situation under which consent might not be considered “freely given.” If consent is invalid because it is not freely given, the processing is usually unlawful. Consequently, a legal basis for processing is missing. Therefore, this is an important provision. Yet the wording of this new provision is vague and its scope is unclear. Thus, the question arises as to how Article 7(4) should be applied. In this paper, the authors tease out the assessment criteria for the application of this provision on the basis of its text, structure and history. These criteria will then be applied to hypothetical cases in the final section.},
	keywords = {bundling, consent, frontpage, General Data Protection Regulation, Privacy},
}

Save .bib

Algoritmische verzuiling en filter bubbles: een bedreiging voor de democratie? external link

Zuiderveen Borgesius, F., Trilling, D., Möller, J., Eskens, S., Bodó, B., Vreese, C.H. de & Helberger, N.

Computerrecht, vol. 2016, num: 5, pp: 255-262, 2016

Links

https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Computerrecht_2016_5.pdf

algoritmen, democratie, filter bubbles, nieuws, personalisatie

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Media coverage of elections: the legal framework in Europe external link

Fahy, R., Apa, E., Bassini, M., Bruna, A., Cabrera Blázquez, F., Cunningham, I., Etteldorf, C., Goldberg, D., Granchet, A., Klimkiewicz, B., Richter, A. & Rozendaal, M.

2017

Links

https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/IRIS_Special_2017_1.pdf

elections, europe, european audiovisual observatory, frontpage, iris special, medialaw

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Top Keywords

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Links

RIS

Bibtex

Links

RIS

Bibtex