Publicaties
Top Keywords
- Annotaties (57)
- Art. 10 EVRM (25)
- Auteursrecht (518)
- Bescherming van communicatie (20)
- Consumentenrecht (22)
- Content moderation (22)
- Databankenrecht (25)
- Digital Services Act (DSA) (31)
- EU (19)
- EU law (25)
- Freedom of expression (49)
- Fundamental rights (18)
- GDPR (22)
- Grondrechten (421)
- Industriële eigendom (38)
- Informatierecht (37)
- Intellectual property (30)
- Intellectuele eigendom (425)
- Internet (24)
- Journalistiek (33)
- Kluwer Information Law Series (43)
- Kronieken (18)
- Media law (30)
- Mediarecht (378)
- Mensenrechten (18)
- Merkenrecht (21)
- Naburige rechten (20)
- Omroeprecht (28)
- Online platforms (20)
- Overheidsinformatie (53)
- Personal data (35)
- Persrecht (41)
- Platforms (24)
- Privacy (327)
- Regulering (20)
- Technologie en recht (75)
- Telecommunicatierecht (127)
- Text and Data Mining (TDM) (21)
- Transparency (19)
- Vrijheid van meningsuiting (198)
Marks, Forfeiture and a Constitutional Conundrum external link
Silent Ethics in the Mobile Phone Sector? The Case of the ‘por qué no te callas?’ Ringtone external link
Parody in Trademarks and Copyright: Has Humour Gone Too Far? external link
Intellectual Property and Social Justice external link
Portugal – Vorläufige Patentanmeldungen: Eine erfolgreiche Neuerung external link
The European Union and ACTA – Or Making Omelettes without Eggs (Again) external link
Abstract
The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) has been cooking for some time now. Some ingredients to that dish are missing though - notably, a clear competence of the European Union. In fact, the Union's struggle for an expansion of its powers - especially in the area of harmonization of national laws with a basis on internal market considerations - has led some doctrine to express concerns whether the relevant provisions could give the EU carte blanche to harmonize in a wide variety of subjects. In the pre-Lisbon era, some authors have called this tendency "competence creep".
Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom