Vrijheid van meningsuiting
| Dommering, E.
Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 14 februari 2017 (Mein Kampf) Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, 2017 (28), pp. 4119-4121, 2017. @article{Dommering2017b,
title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 14 februari 2017 (Mein Kampf)}, author = {Dommering, E.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2017_259.pdf}, year = {2017}, date = {2017-07-18}, journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie}, volume = {2017}, number = {28}, pages = {4119-4121}, abstract = {Verspreiding antiquarisch exemplaar Mein Kampf valt wel onder 137e 2e Sr, maar is niet strafbaar omdat de beperking in strijd komt met artikel 10 EVRM.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Verspreiding antiquarisch exemplaar Mein Kampf valt wel onder 137e 2e Sr, maar is niet strafbaar omdat de beperking in strijd komt met artikel 10 EVRM.
|
| Kulk, S., Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.
Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 24 februari 2017 (X / Google Netherlands) Computerrecht, 2017 (3), pp. 167-169, 2017. @article{Borgesius2017b,
title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 24 februari 2017 (X / Google Netherlands)}, author = {Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. and Kulk, S.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_Computerrecht_2017_3.pdf}, year = {2017}, date = {2017-06-29}, journal = {Computerrecht}, volume = {2017}, number = {3}, pages = {167-169}, abstract = {In zijn arrest laat de Hoge Raad zich uit over hoe de rechten op privacy en gegevensbescherming zich verhouden tot het recht op vrijheid van meningsuiting.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } In zijn arrest laat de Hoge Raad zich uit over hoe de rechten op privacy en gegevensbescherming zich verhouden tot het recht op vrijheid van meningsuiting.
|
| McGonagle, T.
Annotatie bij EHRM 22 november 2016 (Kaos GL / Turkije) European Human Right Cases, (6), 2017. @article{McGonagle2017b,
title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 22 november 2016 (Kaos GL / Turkije)}, author = {McGonagle, T.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_EHRC_2017_6.pdf}, year = {2017}, date = {2017-05-30}, journal = {European Human Right Cases}, number = {6}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| McGonagle, T., Voorhoof, D.
Freedom of Expression, the Media and Journalists: Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights European Audiovisual Observatory, 2017, ISBN: 9789287184351, (IRIS Themes, vol III, new, updated edition, December 2016). @book{McGonagle2017b,
title = {Freedom of Expression, the Media and Journalists: Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights}, author = {McGonagle, T. and Voorhoof, D.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/IRISThemesVolIII_2016.pdf}, isbn = {9789287184351}, year = {2017}, date = {2017-04-13}, publisher = {European Audiovisual Observatory}, abstract = {This e-book provides valuable insights into the European Court of Human Rights’ extensive case-law on freedom of expression and media and journalistic freedoms. With 30,000 downloads, the first and second editions of the e-book (2013, 2015) have proved hugely successful. The new updated edition summarises over 250 judgments or decisions by the Court and provides hyperlinks to the full text of each of the summarised judgments or decisions (via HUDOC, the Court's online case-law database). The latest edition of the e-book is also available in French and in German. For an optimal navigational experience, one should download the e-book and read the technical tips on p. 3. }, note = {IRIS Themes, vol III, new, updated edition, December 2016}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {book} } This e-book provides valuable insights into the European Court of Human Rights’ extensive case-law on freedom of expression and media and journalistic freedoms. With 30,000 downloads, the first and second editions of the e-book (2013, 2015) have proved hugely successful. The new updated edition summarises over 250 judgments or decisions by the Court and provides hyperlinks to the full text of each of the summarised judgments or decisions (via HUDOC, the Court's online case-law database). The latest edition of the e-book is also available in French and in German.
For an optimal navigational experience, one should download the e-book and read the technical tips on p. 3. |
| Helberger, N., Irion, K.
The Weeping Angels are back, and they attack our privacy via smart TVs 2017, (Blogpost at Internet Policy Review: Journal of internet regulation). @article{Irion2017b,
title = {The Weeping Angels are back, and they attack our privacy via smart TVs}, author = {Irion, K. and Helberger, N.}, url = {https://policyreview.info/articles/news/weeping-angels-are-back-and-they-attack-our-privacy-smart-tvs/451}, year = {2017}, date = {2017-03-10}, note = {Blogpost at Internet Policy Review: Journal of internet regulation}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Nieuwenhuis, A.
Mediaforum, 2017 (1), pp. 2-12, 2017. @article{Nieuwenhuis2017,
title = {Van catalogusformules en strong reasons: de ontwikkeling van de artikel 10 jurisprudentie van het EHRM van 2010 tot en met 2016 (deel I)}, author = {Nieuwenhuis, A.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Mediaforum_2017_1.pdf}, year = {2017}, date = {2017-03-10}, journal = {Mediaforum}, volume = {2017}, number = {1}, pages = {2-12}, abstract = {Deze bijdrage geeft een overzicht en analyse van de jurisprudentie van het EHRM over de afgelopen zeven jaar. Daarbij wordt eerst kort ingegaan op de reikwijdte en beperkingsvoorwaarden, waarna de behandeling een meer thematisch karakter krijgt. Zo passeren onder meer ‘persvrijheid en privacy’, ‘uitlatingen over rechtszaken’, en ‘hate speech’ de revue. In dit nummer vindt de lezer het eerste deel van de bijdrage. In \'{e}\'{e}n van de volgende nummers volgt het tweede deel.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Deze bijdrage geeft een overzicht en analyse van de jurisprudentie van het EHRM over de afgelopen zeven jaar. Daarbij wordt eerst kort ingegaan op de reikwijdte en beperkingsvoorwaarden, waarna de behandeling een meer thematisch karakter krijgt. Zo passeren onder meer ‘persvrijheid en privacy’, ‘uitlatingen over rechtszaken’, en ‘hate speech’ de revue. In dit nummer vindt de lezer het eerste deel van de bijdrage. In één van de volgende nummers volgt het tweede deel.
|
| Nieuwenhuis, A.
Annotatie bij Rb. Den Haag 9 december 2016 (OM / Wilders) Mediaforum, 2017 (1), pp. 34-36, 2017. @article{Nieuwenhuis2017b,
title = {Annotatie bij Rb. Den Haag 9 december 2016 (OM / Wilders)}, author = {Nieuwenhuis, A.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_Mediaforum_2017_1.pdf}, year = {2017}, date = {2017-03-10}, journal = {Mediaforum}, volume = {2017}, number = {1}, pages = {34-36}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Kulk, S., Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.
Privacy, Freedom of Expression, and the Right to Be Forgotten in Europe forthcoming in J. Polonetsky, O. Tene, E. Selinger (ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Privacy, 2017, 2017, (Forthcoming in J. Polonetsky, O. Tene, E. Selinger (ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Privacy, Cambridge University Press 2017). @inbook{Kulk2017,
title = {Privacy, Freedom of Expression, and the Right to Be Forgotten in Europe}, author = {Kulk, S. and Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.}, url = {https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2923722}, year = {2017}, date = {2017-03-02}, booktitle = {forthcoming in J. Polonetsky, O. Tene, E. Selinger (ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Privacy, 2017}, abstract = {In this chapter we discuss the relation between privacy and freedom of expression in Europe. In principle, the two rights have equal weight in Europe \textendash which right prevails depends on the circumstances of a case. We use the Google Spain judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, sometimes called the ‘right to be forgotten’ judgment, to illustrate the difficulties when balancing the two rights. The court decided in Google Spain that people have, under certain conditions, the right to have search results for their name delisted. We discuss how Google and Data Protection Authorities deal with such delisting requests in practice. Delisting requests illustrate that balancing privacy and freedom of expression interests will always remain difficult.}, note = {Forthcoming in J. Polonetsky, O. Tene, E. Selinger (ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Privacy, Cambridge University Press 2017}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {inbook} } In this chapter we discuss the relation between privacy and freedom of expression in Europe. In principle, the two rights have equal weight in Europe – which right prevails depends on the circumstances of a case. We use the Google Spain judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, sometimes called the ‘right to be forgotten’ judgment, to illustrate the difficulties when balancing the two rights. The court decided in Google Spain that people have, under certain conditions, the right to have search results for their name delisted. We discuss how Google and Data Protection Authorities deal with such delisting requests in practice. Delisting requests illustrate that balancing privacy and freedom of expression interests will always remain difficult.
|
| McGonagle, T.
Individual submission: Review of the [Irish] Defamation Act 2009 - Public consultation 2016 2017, (Public consultation organised by the Irish Government, Department of Justice and Equality, 17 January 2017, 11 pp. ). @misc{McGonagle2017b,
title = {Individual submission: Review of the [Irish] Defamation Act 2009 - Public consultation 2016}, author = {McGonagle, T.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Submission-to-Review-of-Defamation-Act-2009.pdf}, year = {2017}, date = {2017-02-07}, note = {Public consultation organised by the Irish Government, Department of Justice and Equality, 17 January 2017, 11 pp. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.
Het 'right to be forgotten' en bijzondere persoonsgegevens Computerrecht, (4), pp. 220-225, 2017. @article{Borgesius2017,
title = {Het 'right to be forgotten' en bijzondere persoonsgegevens}, author = {Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Computerrecht_2016_4.pdf}, year = {2017}, date = {2017-02-03}, journal = {Computerrecht}, number = {4}, pages = {220-225}, abstract = {Een advocaat heeft een ‘right to be forgotten’-verzoek gedaan bij Google, met betrekking tot een blogpost over een strafrechtelijke veroordeling van de advocaat in het buitenland. De Rechtbank Rotterdam heeft beslist dat Google niet meer naar de blogpost mag verwijzen als mensen zoeken op de naam van de advocaat. De rechtbank wees het verwijderingsverzoek toe omdat de blogpost een strafrechtelijke veroordeling betreft: een bijzonder persoonsgegeven. De redenering van de rechtbank over bijzondere persoonsgegevens leidt tot problemen voor de vrijheid van meningsuiting. Deze bijdrage verkent hoe die problemen verkleind kunnen worden. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Een advocaat heeft een ‘right to be forgotten’-verzoek gedaan bij Google, met betrekking tot een blogpost
over een strafrechtelijke veroordeling van de advocaat in het buitenland. De Rechtbank Rotterdam heeft beslist dat Google niet meer naar de blogpost mag verwijzen als mensen zoeken op de naam van de advocaat. De rechtbank wees het verwijderingsverzoek toe omdat de blogpost een strafrechtelijke veroordeling betreft: een bijzonder persoonsgegeven. De redenering van de rechtbank over bijzondere persoonsgegevens leidt tot problemen voor de vrijheid van meningsuiting. Deze bijdrage verkent hoe die problemen verkleind kunnen worden. |
| McGonagle, T.
Annotatie bij Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens 8 november 2016 (Magyar Helsinki Bizottság) European Human Right Cases, (2), 2017. @article{McGonagle2017,
title = {Annotatie bij Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens 8 november 2016 (Magyar Helsinki Bizotts\'{a}g)}, author = {McGonagle, T.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_EHRC_2017_2.pdf}, year = {2017}, date = {2017-01-26}, journal = {European Human Right Cases}, number = {2}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Beer, K.E.A. de, Fahy, R.
European Human Right Cases, (1), 2017. @article{Fahy2017,
title = {Annotatie bij Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens 20 september 2016 (Van Beukering & Het Parool / Nederland)}, author = {Fahy, R. and Beer, K.E.A. de}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/EHRC_2017_1.pdf}, year = {2017}, date = {2017-01-24}, journal = {European Human Right Cases}, number = {1}, abstract = {De zaak Van Beukering en Het Parool B.V. t. Nederland betreft de publicatie van een portret zonder toestemming van de geportretteerde. Het Parool had een artikel geplaatst over het strafproces inzake een rapper die werd verdacht van het plegen van een aantal misdrijven. Bij het artikel had Parool een foto geplaatst van de rapper. De foto was afkomstig uit een documentaire over de rapper “R.P.,” waar hij een aantal jaar eerder aan had meegewerkt. De documentaire werd in het artikel uitvoerig besproken. De documentaire stond op het moment van publicatie nog online. Het gaat in deze zaak om de vraag of Het Parool onrechtmatig heeft gehandeld door de foto van de rapper te publiceren. Het EHRM overweegt dat een afweging moet worden gemaakt tussen twee fundamentele rechten: het recht op eerbiediging van priv\'{e}leven (art. 8 EVRM) van de rapper en het recht op vrijheid van meningsuiting (art. 10 EVRM) van Het Parool. Het Hof stelt vast dat de Hoge Raad geen onredelijke conclusie heeft getrokken door in dit geval art. 8 EVRM te laten prevaleren. Het Hof verklaart het verzoekschrift van Van Beukering en Het Parool niet-ontvankelijk.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } De zaak Van Beukering en Het Parool B.V. t. Nederland betreft de publicatie van een portret zonder toestemming van de geportretteerde. Het Parool had een artikel geplaatst over het strafproces inzake een rapper die werd verdacht van het plegen van een aantal misdrijven. Bij het artikel had Parool een foto geplaatst van de rapper. De foto was afkomstig uit een documentaire over de rapper “R.P.,” waar hij een aantal jaar eerder aan had meegewerkt. De documentaire werd in het artikel uitvoerig besproken. De documentaire stond op het moment van publicatie nog online. Het gaat in deze zaak om de vraag of Het Parool onrechtmatig heeft gehandeld door de foto van de rapper te publiceren. Het EHRM overweegt dat een afweging moet worden gemaakt tussen twee fundamentele rechten: het recht op eerbiediging van privéleven (art. 8 EVRM) van de rapper en het recht op vrijheid van meningsuiting (art. 10 EVRM) van Het Parool. Het Hof stelt vast dat de Hoge Raad geen onredelijke conclusie heeft getrokken door in dit geval art. 8 EVRM te laten prevaleren. Het Hof verklaart het verzoekschrift van Van Beukering en Het Parool niet-ontvankelijk.
|
| van Eechoud, M.
2017, (Study conducted on commission from OpenForum Europe, January 2017). @techreport{vanEechoud2017b,
title = {A publisher's intellectual property right: Implications for freedom of expression, authors and open content policies}, author = {van Eechoud, M.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/OFE_Implications_of_publishers_right.pdf}, year = {2017}, date = {2017-01-19}, note = {Study conducted on commission from OpenForum Europe, January 2017}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| Dommering, E.
Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 13 oktober 2015 Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, (48), pp. p. 6223, 2016, (nr. 469). @article{Dommering2016b,
title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 13 oktober 2015 }, author = {Dommering, E.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2016_469.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-12-08}, journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie}, number = {48}, pages = {p. 6223}, abstract = {Journalist mag een identiteitsbewijs alleen in het kader van de nieuwsgaring vervalsen als er objectief gezien geen legaal middel voor handen is en het nieuwsgaringsbelang heel hoog is.}, note = {nr. 469}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Journalist mag een identiteitsbewijs alleen in het kader van de nieuwsgaring vervalsen als er objectief gezien geen legaal middel voor handen is en het nieuwsgaringsbelang heel hoog is.
|
| Breemen, J., Breemen, V.
Kroniek Mediarecht KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi, 141 , pp. 8222-8224, 2016, ISSN: 2212-5205-3. @article{Breemen2016b,
title = {Kroniek Mediarecht}, author = {Breemen, J. and Breemen, V.}, issn = {2212-5205-3}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-12-01}, journal = {KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi}, volume = {141}, pages = {8222-8224}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Dommering, E.
Annotatie bij Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens 16 juni 2015 (Delfi AS / Estland) Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, (47), pp. 6102-6108, 2016, (nr. 457). @article{Dommering2016b,
title = {Annotatie bij Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens 16 juni 2015 (Delfi AS / Estland)}, author = {Dommering, E.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2016_457.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-11-29}, journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie}, number = {47}, pages = {6102-6108}, abstract = {Privacy en vrijheid van meningsuiting. Civielrechtelijke veroordeling exploitant nieuwswebsite vanwege beledigende reacties op webforum nieuwszenderuitlatingen door lezers. Geen schending vrijheid van meningsuiting.}, note = {nr. 457}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Privacy en vrijheid van meningsuiting. Civielrechtelijke veroordeling exploitant nieuwswebsite vanwege beledigende reacties op webforum nieuwszenderuitlatingen door lezers. Geen schending vrijheid van meningsuiting.
|
| McGonagle, T.
Freedom of expression and defamation: A study of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights Council of Europe, 2016, ISBN: 9789287182500. @book{McGonagle2016,
title = {Freedom of expression and defamation: A study of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights}, author = {McGonagle, T. }, url = {https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=09000016806ac95b}, isbn = {9789287182500}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-10-04}, publisher = {Council of Europe}, abstract = {Freedom of expression is a fundamental freedom, one of the cornerstones of democracy in Europe, enshrined in various key texts, including the European Convention on Human Rights. But the boundaries between freedom to criticise and damaging a person’s honour or reputation are not always very clear. By defining public insults and defamation, the law can set limits on freedom of expression, which is neither absolute nor boundless. But how far can it go? This study examines the details of the European Court of Human Right’s case law on defamation. It explores a range of substantive and procedural issues that the Court has considered, and clarifies the concept of defamation, positioning it in relation to freedom of expression and public debate. It explains how overly protective defamation laws can have a chilling effect on freedom of expression and public debate, and discusses the proportionality of defamation laws and their application. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {book} } Freedom of expression is a fundamental freedom, one of the cornerstones of democracy in Europe, enshrined in various key texts, including the European Convention on Human Rights. But the boundaries between freedom to criticise and damaging a person’s honour or reputation are not always very clear. By defining public insults and defamation, the law can set limits on freedom of expression, which is neither absolute nor boundless. But how far can it go?
This study examines the details of the European Court of Human Right’s case law on defamation. It explores a range of substantive and procedural issues that the Court has considered, and clarifies the concept of defamation, positioning it in relation to freedom of expression and public debate. It explains how overly protective defamation laws can have a chilling effect on freedom of expression and public debate, and discusses the proportionality of defamation laws and their application. |
| Guibault, L., van Eechoud, M.
International copyright reform in support of open legal information (working paper draft, Sep. 2016) 2016, (Paper for Open Data Research Symposium Madrid 2016 ). @article{vanEechoud2016,
title = {International copyright reform in support of open legal information (working paper draft, Sep. 2016)}, author = {van Eechoud, M. and Guibault, L. }, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/OpendataCopyrightReform_ODRSdraft-WP_sep16.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-09-30}, abstract = {This paper analyzes the status of legal information under international and national copyright laws. It argues that the current uncertainties with respect to the copyright status of primary legal materials (legislation, court decisions) and secondary legal materials such as parliamentary records and other official texts relevant to the interpretation of law, constitute a barrier to access and use. The time has come for reform of the international copyright system in WIPO. International law should recognize explicitly that primary and secondary legal materials are public domain and thus not subject to copyright or related rights. This will bring outdated copyright norms across the world up to date with current developments: the trend towards universal recognition of the right to access government information as part of human rights, the UN’s sustainable development goals with respect to access to law, and the rapid growth of open government policies worldwide, supported by the Open Government Partnership (OGP). }, note = {Paper for Open Data Research Symposium Madrid 2016 }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This paper analyzes the status of legal information under international and national copyright laws. It argues that the current uncertainties with respect to the copyright status of primary legal materials (legislation, court decisions) and secondary legal materials such as parliamentary records and other official texts relevant to the interpretation of law, constitute a barrier to access and use. The time has come for reform of the international copyright system in WIPO. International law should recognize explicitly that primary and secondary legal materials are public domain and thus not subject to copyright or related rights. This will bring outdated copyright norms across the world up to date with current developments: the trend towards universal recognition of the right to access government information as part of human rights, the UN’s sustainable development goals with respect to access to law, and the rapid growth of open government policies worldwide, supported by the Open Government Partnership (OGP).
|
| Dommering, E.
Annotatie bij EHRM 21 oktober 2014 (Vural / Turkije) Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, (36), pp. 4465-4471, 2016, (nr. 336). @article{Dommering2016b,
title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 21 oktober 2014 (Vural / Turkije)}, author = {Dommering, E. }, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2016_336.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-09-13}, journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie}, number = {36}, pages = {4465-4471}, abstract = {Vrijheid van meningsuiting. Veroordeling tot ruim 13 jaar gevangenisstraf en ontneming kiesrecht wegens belediging nagedachtenis Atat\"{u}rk door standbeelden met verf te besmeuren. Proportionaliteit. Schending art. 10 EVRM en art. 3 Eerste Protocol. }, note = {nr. 336}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Vrijheid van meningsuiting. Veroordeling tot ruim 13 jaar gevangenisstraf en ontneming kiesrecht
wegens belediging nagedachtenis Atatürk door standbeelden met verf te besmeuren. Proportionaliteit. Schending art. 10 EVRM en art. 3 Eerste Protocol. |
| Dommering, E.
Het verschil van mening, geschiedenis van een verkeerd begrepen idee Uitgeverij Prometheus, 2016, ISBN: 9789035142619. @book{Dommering2016,
title = {Het verschil van mening, geschiedenis van een verkeerd begrepen idee}, author = {Dommering, E. }, url = {http://uitgeverijprometheus.nl/catalogus/het-verschil-van-mening.html}, isbn = {9789035142619}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-09-06}, pages = {688 pp}, publisher = {Uitgeverij Prometheus}, abstract = {Vrijheid is een oud begrip dat staat voor het zich losmaken van groepen en individuen uit de macht van een ander. Die vrijheid werd gesymboliseerd door de zogenoemde vrijheidshoed, want in het Romeinse Rijk mocht een vrijgemaakte slaaf een hoofddeksel gaan dragen. In Europa krijgt vrijheid als eerste gestalte in de godsdienstvrijheid en het eigendomsrecht. Het geloof wordt losgemaakt van het gezag van de kerkelijke autoriteit. De eigendom is niet langer een privilege toegekend door een vorst, maar iets wat je verwerft door inbezitneming of door eigen inspanning. De vrijheid van denken en spreken bepaalt hoe wij over de samenleving en de natuur denken. Het publieke debat en het democratische besluit vervangen het door God gegeven politieke gezag. Het onderzoek naar de natuur komt in de plaats van een godsdienstig wereldbeeld. Deze vrijheden hebben de Europese democratie gemaakt tot wat zij nu is. Het verschil van mening geeft een idee\"{e}ngeschiedenis van deze vrijheden, waarbij de vrijheid van meningsuiting centraal staat. Het boek trekt de lijn door naar het heden en de rol van internet, dat alle kennis in de wereld toegankelijk maakt, maar onder zijn eigen toegankelijkheid lijkt te bezwijken. De burgers die hun vrijheden op internet uitoefenen, hebben er een elektronische politieman bij gekregen die permanent over hun schouder meekijkt.
}, Vrijheid is een oud begrip dat staat voor het zich losmaken van groepen en individuen uit de macht van een ander. Die vrijheid werd gesymboliseerd door de zogenoemde vrijheidshoed, want in het Romeinse Rijk mocht een vrijgemaakte slaaf een hoofddeksel gaan dragen. In Europa krijgt vrijheid als eerste gestalte in de godsdienstvrijheid en het eigendomsrecht. Het geloof wordt losgemaakt van het gezag van de kerkelijke autoriteit. De eigendom is niet langer een privilege toegekend door een vorst, maar iets wat je verwerft door inbezitneming of door eigen inspanning. De vrijheid van denken en spreken bepaalt hoe wij over de samenleving en de natuur denken. Het publieke debat en het democratische besluit vervangen het door God gegeven politieke gezag. Het onderzoek naar de natuur komt in de plaats van een godsdienstig wereldbeeld. Deze vrijheden hebben de Europese democratie gemaakt tot wat zij nu is.
Het verschil van mening geeft een ideeëngeschiedenis van deze vrijheden, waarbij de vrijheid van meningsuiting centraal staat. Het boek trekt de lijn door naar het heden en de rol van internet, dat alle kennis in de wereld toegankelijk maakt, maar onder zijn eigen toegankelijkheid lijkt te bezwijken. De burgers die hun vrijheden op internet uitoefenen, hebben er een elektronische politieman bij gekregen die permanent over hun schouder meekijkt.
|
| McGonagle, T.
Annotatie bij EHRM 2 februari 2016 (MTE en Index.hu / Hongarije) European Human Rights Cases, (7), 2016. @article{,
title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 2 februari 2016 (MTE en Index.hu / Hongarije)}, author = {McGonagle, T.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_EHRC_2016_7.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-07-15}, journal = {European Human Rights Cases}, number = {7}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| van der Sloot, B.
Annotatie bij EHRM 19 januari 2016 (Kalda / Estland) 2016. @misc{,
title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 19 januari 2016 (Kalda / Estland)}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1810}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-07-14}, journal = {European Human Rights Cases}, number = {6}, abstract = { De zaak Kalda t. Estland betreft het recht op gedeeltelijke toegang tot het internet van een levenslang gestrafte gevangene. Het gaat hierbij met name om een drietal websites die toegang bieden tot wetgeving, juridische informatie en uitspraken (en vertalingen daarvan) van rechterlijke instanties. Het EHRM stelt in deze zaak dat een dergelijk recht inderdaad wordt beschermd door art. 10 EVRM. Alhoewel de beperking van dit recht in casu is voorgeschreven bij wet en een legitiem doel dient, acht het Hof deze niet noodzakelijk in een democratische samenleving. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} }
De zaak Kalda t. Estland betreft het recht op gedeeltelijke toegang tot het internet van een levenslang gestrafte gevangene. Het gaat hierbij met name om een drietal websites die toegang bieden tot wetgeving, juridische informatie en uitspraken (en vertalingen daarvan) van rechterlijke instanties. Het EHRM stelt in deze zaak dat een dergelijk recht inderdaad wordt beschermd door art. 10 EVRM. Alhoewel de beperking van dit recht in casu is voorgeschreven bij wet en een legitiem doel dient, acht het Hof deze niet noodzakelijk in een democratische samenleving.
|
| Nieuwenhuis, A.
Annotatie bij Hof Amsterdam 9 maart 2016 (strafzaak verbod op groepsbelediging) 2016. @misc{,
title = {Annotatie bij Hof Amsterdam 9 maart 2016 (strafzaak verbod op groepsbelediging)}, author = {A.J. Nieuwenhuis}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1785}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-09}, journal = {Mediaforum}, number = {3}, pages = {81-84.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Breemen, J., Breemen, V.
KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi, 139 , pp. 8075-8077, 2016, ISSN: 2212-5205-3. @article{Breemen2016b,
title = {Kroniek Mediarecht}, author = {Breemen, J. and Breemen, V. }, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/kwartaalsignaal-139-mediarecht.pdf}, issn = {2212-5205-3}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-01}, journal = {KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi}, volume = {139}, pages = {8075-8077}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Dommering, E.
2016. @misc{,
title = {Het meningloze tijdperk}, author = {E.J. Dommering}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1737.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-03-01}, abstract = { Bijdrage over de vrijheid van meningsuiting in het populistische tijdperk. }, note = { Verschenen in: Zonder tegenspraak, nr. 30, E. Lievens (red.), feestbundel Dirk Voorhoof, Brugge: die Keure Professional Publishing 2016, p. 74-79. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} }
Bijdrage over de vrijheid van meningsuiting in het populistische tijdperk.
|
| McGonagle, T.
Annotatie bij EHRM 20 oktober 2015 (Pentikäinen / Finland) 2016. @misc{,
title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 20 oktober 2015 (Pentik\"{a}inen / Finland)}, author = {T. McGonagle}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1730.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-02-25}, journal = {European Human Rights Cases}, number = {3}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Hins, A.
Zo'n huisbezoek is niet zo onschuldig als het lijkt 2016. @periodical{,
title = {Zo'n huisbezoek is niet zo onschuldig als het lijkt}, author = {A.W. Hins}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1732.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-02-25}, note = { Opinie in NRC Handelsblad van 23 januari 2016. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {periodical} } |
| van der Sloot, B.
Welcome to the Jungle: the Liability of Internet Intermediaries for Privacy Violations in Europe JIPITEC, (3), pp. 211-228., 2016. @article{,
title = {Welcome to the Jungle: the Liability of Internet Intermediaries for Privacy Violations in Europe}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1720.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-19}, journal = {JIPITEC}, number = {3}, pages = {211-228.}, abstract = { In Europe, roughly three regimes apply to the liability of Internet intermediaries for privacy violations conducted by users through their network. These are: the e-Commerce Directive, which, under certain conditions, excludes them from liability; the Data Protection Directive, which imposes a number of duties and responsibilities on providers processing personal data; and the freedom of expression, contained inter alia in the ECHR, which, under certain conditions, grants Internet providers several privileges and freedoms. Each doctrine has its own field of application, but they also have partial overlap. In practice, this creates legal inequality and uncertainty, especially with regard to providers that host online platforms and process User Generated Content. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} }
In Europe, roughly three regimes apply to the liability of Internet intermediaries for privacy violations conducted by users through their network. These are: the e-Commerce Directive, which, under certain conditions, excludes them from liability; the Data Protection Directive, which imposes a number of duties and responsibilities on providers processing personal data; and the freedom of expression, contained inter alia in the ECHR, which, under certain conditions, grants Internet providers several privileges and freedoms. Each doctrine has its own field of application, but they also have partial overlap. In practice, this creates legal inequality and uncertainty, especially with regard to providers that host online platforms and process User Generated Content.
|
| Nieuwenhuis, A.
Ars Aequi, (1), pp. 21-24., 2016. @article{,
title = {De geschonden majesteit}, author = {A.J. Nieuwenhuis}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1716.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-15}, journal = {Ars Aequi}, number = {1}, pages = {21-24.}, abstract = { Sinds 1830 is in Nederland de majesteitsschennis strafbaar; met enige regelmaat vinden er ook vervolgingen plaats. Hieronder wordt de vraag gesteld of een dergelijk delict in een moderne democratie wel bestaansrecht heeft. De vraag wordt beantwoord door aandacht te besteden aan de rechtsgoederen die een verbod van belediging kan beschermen, aan de verhouding tussen vrijheid van meningsuiting en democratie, aan de onschendbaarheid van de koning, en aan de ontwikkeling van het positieve recht. }, note = { Opinie }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} }
Sinds 1830 is in Nederland de majesteitsschennis strafbaar; met enige regelmaat vinden er ook vervolgingen plaats. Hieronder wordt de vraag gesteld of een dergelijk delict in een moderne democratie wel bestaansrecht heeft. De vraag wordt beantwoord door aandacht te besteden aan de rechtsgoederen die een verbod van belediging kan beschermen, aan de verhouding tussen vrijheid van meningsuiting en democratie, aan de onschendbaarheid van de koning, en aan de ontwikkeling van het positieve recht.
|
| McGonagle, T.
Freedom of expression: still a precondition for democracy? 2016. @techreport{,
title = {Freedom of expression: still a precondition for democracy?}, author = {T. McGonagle}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1707.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-14}, note = { Conference Report, Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2015, 24 pp. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| Cavaliere, P., Irion, K., Pavli, D.
2015. @techreport{,
title = {Comparative study of best European practices of online content regulation: Law and policy of online content regulation, in particular defamation online, in the light of Albanian legislative proposals}, author = {P. Cavaliere and D. Pavli and K. Irion}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1683.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-11-10}, note = { Study commissioned by the Council of Europe, Amsterdam/Edinburgh/Tirana, August 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| McGonagle, T.
Freedom of Expression, the Media and Journalists: Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights European Audiovisual Observatory, Strasbourg, 2015. @book{,
title = {Freedom of Expression, the Media and Journalists: Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights}, author = {T. McGonagle}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1644.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-10-23}, pages = {409}, publisher = {European Audiovisual Observatory}, address = {Strasbourg}, series = {IRIS Themes}, abstract = { This e-book provides valuable insights into the European Court of Human Rights’ case-law on freedom of expression and media and journalistic freedoms. The first edition of the e-book (2013) proved hugely successful, with 18,671 downloads in 2014 alone. The new updated edition summarises over 240 judgments or decisions by the Court and provides hyperlinks to the full text of each of the summarised judgments or decisions (via HUDOC, the Court's online case-law database). The e-book is also available in French. For an optimal navigational experience, one should download the e-book and read the technical tips on p. 3.
This e-book provides valuable insights into the European Court of Human Rights’ case-law on freedom of expression and media and journalistic freedoms. The first edition of the e-book (2013) proved hugely successful, with 18,671 downloads in 2014 alone. The new updated edition summarises over 240 judgments or decisions by the Court and provides hyperlinks to the full text of each of the summarised judgments or decisions (via HUDOC, the Court's online case-law database). The e-book is also available in French.
For an optimal navigational experience, one should download the e-book and read the technical tips on p. 3. |
| McGonagle, T.
Positive obligations concerning freedom of expression: mere potential or real power? pp. 9-35., 2015, (Chapter in: Journalism at risk: Threats, challenges and perspectives, O. Andreotti (ed.), Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing 2015, p. 9-35.). @inbook{McGonagle2015,
title = {Positive obligations concerning freedom of expression: mere potential or real power?}, author = {McGonagle, T.}, url = {https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=0900001680706afe}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-10-23}, pages = {9-35.}, abstract = { This chapter examines how the European Court of Human Rights has identified and developed a range of positive State obligations to secure the right to freedom of expression. It first briefly examines the theoretical and normative bases for the positive obligations doctrine and then traces its hesitant development in the case-law of the Court. Next, it shows how the Court has slowly become more comfortable with the doctrine and more confident when applying it to cases involving freedom of expression, culminating in its \emph{Dink v. Turkey} judgment. The driving argument of the chapter is that the positive obligations doctrine has enormous potential for strengthening the right to freedom of expression and that the Court must now tease out its implications in concrete cases in a very scrupulous way, if the doctrine’s full potential is to be realised. }, note = {Chapter in: Journalism at risk: Threats, challenges and perspectives, O. Andreotti (ed.), Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing 2015, p. 9-35.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {inbook} }
This chapter examines how the European Court of Human Rights has identified and developed a range of positive State obligations to secure the right to freedom of expression. It first briefly examines the theoretical and normative bases for the positive obligations doctrine and then traces its hesitant development in the case-law of the Court. Next, it shows how the Court has slowly become more comfortable with the doctrine and more confident when applying it to cases involving freedom of expression, culminating in its Dink v. Turkey judgment. The driving argument of the chapter is that the positive obligations doctrine has enormous potential for strengthening the right to freedom of expression and that the Court must now tease out its implications in concrete cases in a very scrupulous way, if the doctrine’s full potential is to be realised.
|
| Leerssen, P.
JIPITEC, 6 (2), 2015. @article{Leerssen2019,
title = {Cut Out By The Middle Man: The Free Speech Implications Of Social Network Blocking and Banning In The EU}, author = {Leerssen, P.}, url = {https://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-6-2-2015/4271/leerssen.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-10-10}, journal = {JIPITEC}, volume = {6}, number = {2}, abstract = {This article examines social network users’ legal defences against content removal under the EU and ECHR frameworks, and their implications for the effective exercise of free speech online. A review of the Terms of Use and content moderation policies of two major social network services, Facebook and Twitter, shows that end users are unlikely to have a contractual defence against content removal. Under the EU and ECHR frameworks, they may demand the observance of free speech principles in state-issued blocking orders and their implementation by intermediaries, but cannot invoke this ‘fair balance’ test against the voluntary removal decisions by the social network service. Drawing on practical examples, this article explores the threat to free speech created by this lack of accountability: Firstly, a shift from legislative regulation and formal injunctions to public-private collaborations allows state authorities to influence these ostensibly voluntary policies, thereby circumventing constitutional safeguards. Secondly, even absent state interference, the commercial incentives of social media cannot be guaranteed to coincide with democratic ideals. In light of the blurring of public and private functions in the regulation of social media expression, this article calls for the increased accountability of the social media services towards end users regarding the observance of free speech principles.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This article examines social network users’ legal defences against content removal under the EU and ECHR frameworks, and their implications for the effective exercise of free speech online. A review of the Terms of Use and content moderation policies of two major social network services, Facebook and Twitter, shows that end users are unlikely to have a contractual defence against content removal. Under the EU and ECHR frameworks, they may demand the observance of free speech principles in state-issued blocking orders and their implementation by intermediaries, but cannot invoke this ‘fair balance’ test against the voluntary removal decisions by the social network service. Drawing on practical examples, this article explores the threat to free speech created by this lack of accountability: Firstly, a shift from legislative regulation and formal injunctions to public-private collaborations allows state authorities to influence these ostensibly voluntary policies, thereby circumventing constitutional safeguards. Secondly, even absent state interference, the commercial incentives of social media cannot be guaranteed to coincide with democratic ideals. In light of the blurring of public and private functions in the regulation of social media expression, this article calls for the increased accountability of the social media services towards end users regarding the observance of free speech principles.
|
| McGonagle, T.
Freedom of expression: new opportunities and challenges 2015. @misc{,
title = {Freedom of expression: new opportunities and challenges}, author = {T. McGonagle}, url = {http://play.webvideocore.net/popplayer.php?it=55i5kw2syio0&is_link=1&w=720&h=405&pause=1&title=1502002+-+Tarlach+McGonagle+Interview+-+ENG&skin=3&repeat=&brandNW=1&start_volume=100&bg_gradient1=&bg_gradient2=&fullscreen=&fs_mode=0&skinAlpha=80&colorBase=%}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-10-09}, abstract = { This is one of seven videos about different aspects of the right to freedom of expression: hate speech, protection of sources, defamation, access to information, terrorism, Internet freedom and new opportunities and challenges for freedom of expression. The videos were produced by the Council of Europe and they take the form of interviews with leading experts in the field, including three sitting judges of the European Court of Human Rights, a former Vice-President of the Court and the Council of Europe Human Rights Commissioner. }, note = { Video series produced by the Council of Europe, The Hows and Whys: Freedom of Expression, a Human Right, October 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} }
This is one of seven videos about different aspects of the right to freedom of expression: hate speech, protection of sources, defamation, access to information, terrorism, Internet freedom and new opportunities and challenges for freedom of expression. The videos were produced by the Council of Europe and they take the form of interviews with leading experts in the field, including three sitting judges of the European Court of Human Rights, a former Vice-President of the Court and the Council of Europe Human Rights Commissioner.
|
| Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.
Freedom of Expression and 'Right to Be Forgotten' Cases in the Netherlands after Google Spain European Data Protection Law Review, (2), pp. 113-125., 2015. @article{,
title = {Freedom of Expression and 'Right to Be Forgotten' Cases in the Netherlands after Google Spain}, author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius}, url = {http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2652171}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-17}, journal = {European Data Protection Law Review}, number = {2}, pages = {113-125.}, abstract = { Since the Google Spain judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Europeans have, under certain conditions, the right to have search results for their name delisted. This paper examines how the Google Spain judgment has been applied in the Netherlands. Since the Google Spain judgment, Dutch courts have decided on two cases regarding delisting requests. In both cases, the Dutch courts considered freedom of expression aspects of delisting more thoroughly than the Court of Justice. However, the effect of the Google Spain judgment on freedom of expression is difficult to assess, as search engine operators decide about most delisting requests without disclosing much about their decisions. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} }
Since the Google Spain judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Europeans have, under certain conditions, the right to have search results for their name delisted. This paper examines how the Google Spain judgment has been applied in the Netherlands. Since the Google Spain judgment, Dutch courts have decided on two cases regarding delisting requests. In both cases, the Dutch courts considered freedom of expression aspects of delisting more thoroughly than the Court of Justice. However, the effect of the Google Spain judgment on freedom of expression is difficult to assess, as search engine operators decide about most delisting requests without disclosing much about their decisions.
|
| van der Sloot, B.
Annotatie bij Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens 16 juni 2015 (Delfi AS / Estland) 2015. @misc{,
title = {Annotatie bij Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens 16 juni 2015 (Delfi AS / Estland)}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1622.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-11}, journal = {European Human Rights Cases}, number = {9}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| McGonagle, T.
The development of freedom of expression and information within the UN: leaps and bounds or fits and starts? 2015, ( @inbook{McGonagle2015,
title = {The development of freedom of expression and information within the UN: leaps and bounds or fits and starts?}, author = {McGonagle, T.}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-06-05}, abstract = { This chapter tells the story of how the rights to freedom of expression and information have been shaped by the United Nations’ (UN) institutional dynamics over the years. It gives an account of how the growth of the rights to freedom of expression and information has been both stimulated and stymied by different factors in the particular institutional context of the UN. It traces the broad contours of the two rights by connecting the largest conceptual, normative, historical and institutional dots. The chapter opens with a brief exploration of the contiguous nature of the rights to freedom of expression and information. This necessarily involves reflection on the instrumental role that the media and new communications technologies can play in the realization of both rights in practice. The remainder of the chapter has an overtly institutional focus. Its next three substantive sections correspond to three broad \textendash roughly chronological, but occasionally overlapping - phases in the development of freedom of expression and information at the UN. Each period is denoted by its key features or aspirations: trail-blazing, consolidation and expansion, and the quest for coherence and consistency. Various thematic challenges have presented themselves during these periods, a number of which are woven into the chapter’s narrative. Finally, after offering some substantive conclusions, the chapter will explain the objectives and structure of the book as a whole.
This chapter tells the story of how the rights to freedom of expression and information have been shaped by the United Nations’ (UN) institutional dynamics over the years. It gives an account of how the growth of the rights to freedom of expression and information has been both stimulated and stymied by different factors in the particular institutional context of the UN. It traces the broad contours of the two rights by connecting the largest conceptual, normative, historical and institutional dots.<br />
The chapter opens with a brief exploration of the contiguous nature of the rights to freedom of expression and information. This necessarily involves reflection on the instrumental role that the media and new communications technologies can play in the realization of both rights in practice. The remainder of the chapter has an overtly institutional focus. Its next three substantive sections correspond to three broad – roughly chronological, but occasionally overlapping - phases in the development of freedom of expression and information at the UN. Each period is denoted by its key features or aspirations: trail-blazing, consolidation and expansion, and the quest for coherence and consistency. Various thematic challenges have presented themselves during these periods, a number of which are woven into the chapter’s narrative. Finally, after offering some substantive conclusions, the chapter will explain the objectives and structure of the book as a whole. |
| Kulk, S., Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.
De implicaties van het Google Spain-arrest voor de vrijheid van meningsuiting NJCM-Bulletin, (1), pp. 3-19., 2015. @article{,
title = {De implicaties van het Google Spain-arrest voor de vrijheid van meningsuiting}, author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius and S. Kulk}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1566.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-06-04}, journal = {NJCM-Bulletin}, number = {1}, pages = {3-19.}, abstract = { In deze bijdrage wordt het \emph{Google Spain-}arrest van het Hof van Justitie van de Europese Unie besproken, evenals de ontwikkelingen na het arrest. Centraal staat de vraag naar de gevolgen van het arrest voor de vrijheid van meningsuiting. De auteurs betogen dat het Hof onvoldoende aandacht schenkt aan de vrijheid van meningsuiting. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} }
In deze bijdrage wordt het Google Spain-arrest van het Hof van Justitie van de Europese Unie besproken, evenals de ontwikkelingen na het arrest. Centraal staat de vraag naar de gevolgen van het arrest voor de vrijheid van meningsuiting. De auteurs betogen dat het Hof onvoldoende aandacht schenkt aan de vrijheid van meningsuiting.
|
| Donders, Y., McGonagle, T.
The United Nations and Freedom of Expression and Information: Critical Perspectives 2015. @book{,
title = {The United Nations and Freedom of Expression and Information: Critical Perspectives}, author = {Y.M. Donders and T. McGonagle}, url = {http://www.cambridge.org/nl/academic/subjects/law/un-and-international-organisations/united-nations-and-freedom-expression-and-information-critical-perspectives?format=HB}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-06-04}, abstract = { This book provides a critical and uniquely comprehensive examination of the main UN standards and mechanisms dealing with the rights to freedom of expression and information. It details the chequered history of both rights within the UN system and evaluates the suitability of the system for overcoming contemporary challenges and threats to both rights. The book’s institutional focus comprises five international treaties, UNESCO and the UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression. Different aspects of freedom of expression and information are foregrounded in different treaties, to ensure the effective enjoyment of both rights by particular groups, eg. children or persons with disabilities, or the meaningful application of the rights in particular situations, eg. combating racism. The book’s thematic focus examines a selection of themes that are prompting fresh thinking about the substance and scope of the rights to freedom of expression and information, eg. the impact of new communication technologies. ISBN: 9781107083868.
This book provides a critical and uniquely comprehensive examination of the main UN standards and mechanisms dealing with the rights to freedom of expression and information. It details the chequered history of both rights within the UN system and evaluates the suitability of the system for overcoming contemporary challenges and threats to both rights.
The book’s institutional focus comprises five international treaties, UNESCO and the UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression. Different aspects of freedom of expression and information are foregrounded in different treaties, to ensure the effective enjoyment of both rights by particular groups, eg. children or persons with disabilities, or the meaningful application of the rights in particular situations, eg. combating racism. The book’s thematic focus examines a selection of themes that are prompting fresh thinking about the substance and scope of the rights to freedom of expression and information, eg. the impact of new communication technologies. |
| Dommering, E.
'Van de koning zelf mag het ook' 2015. @misc{,
title = {'Van de koning zelf mag het ook'}, author = {E.J. Dommering}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1551.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-05-06}, note = { Interview in Het Parool van 6 mei 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Fahy, R.
Political Advertising Bans and Freedom of Expression Greek Public Law Journal, pp. 226-228, 2015. @article{,
title = {Political Advertising Bans and Freedom of Expression}, author = {R.F. Fahy}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1534.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-14}, journal = {Greek Public Law Journal}, pages = {226-228}, abstract = { In \emph{Animal Defenders International v UK}, the 17-judge Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the UK’s ban on political advertising on television, as applied to an animal rights organisation, did not violate freedom of expression. The Court divided nine votes to eight, with the majority opinion abandoning the Court’s previous ‘strict scrutiny’ review, and laying down a new doctrine for reviewing political advertising bans. This article, first, examines the role the composition of the Grand Chamber played in the outcome of the case. Second, questions the basis of the new doctrine of review. And third, criticises the majority’s treatment of precedent. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} }
In Animal Defenders International v UK, the 17-judge Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the UK’s ban on political advertising on television, as applied to an animal rights organisation, did not violate freedom of expression. The Court divided nine votes to eight, with the majority opinion abandoning the Court’s previous ‘strict scrutiny’ review, and laying down a new doctrine for reviewing political advertising bans. This article, first, examines the role the composition of the Grand Chamber played in the outcome of the case. Second, questions the basis of the new doctrine of review. And third, criticises the majority’s treatment of precedent.
|
| van der Sloot, B.
Annotatie bij Rb. Amsterdam 18 september 2014 (Google) 2015. @misc{,
title = {Annotatie bij Rb. Amsterdam 18 september 2014 (Google)}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1560.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-10}, journal = {Jurisprudentie Bescherming Persoonsgegevens (JBP)}, abstract = { Verzoek verwijdering Google. Recht om vergeten te worden. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} }
Verzoek verwijdering Google. Recht om vergeten te worden.
|
|
Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 3 september 2014 (Deckmyn / Vandersteen) 2014, ( @misc{,
title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 3 september 2014 (Deckmyn / Vandersteen)}, author = {J.M. Breemen}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1459.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-12-18}, journal = {European Human Rights Cases}, number = {12}, pages = {657-662.}, abstract = { Grote Kamer. Auteursrecht. Uitleg parodie-exceptie. Vrijheid van meningsuiting. Politieke spotprent. }, note = { C-201/13 }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} }
Grote Kamer. Auteursrecht. Uitleg parodie-exceptie. Vrijheid van meningsuiting. Politieke spotprent.
|
| Breemen, J.
Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 3 september 2014 (Deckmyn / Vandersteen) European Human Rights Cases, 15 (12), pp. 657-662, 2014. @article{Breemen2014,
title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 3 september 2014 (Deckmyn / Vandersteen)}, author = {Breemen, J.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/ehrc-2014-12-annotatie-deckmynvandersteen-j-m-breemen/}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-12-10}, journal = {European Human Rights Cases}, volume = {15}, number = {12}, pages = {657-662}, publisher = {Sdu Uitgevers}, abstract = {Grote Kamer. Auteursrecht. Uitleg parodie-exceptie. Vrijheid van meningsuiting. Politieke spotprent. Richtlijn 2001/29/EG art. 2, 3, 5 lid 3 (k). EVRM art. 10 lid 1 en 2.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Grote Kamer. Auteursrecht. Uitleg parodie-exceptie. Vrijheid van meningsuiting. Politieke spotprent. Richtlijn 2001/29/EG art. 2, 3, 5 lid 3 (k). EVRM art. 10 lid 1 en 2.
|
| Kulk, S., Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.
Google Spain v. González: Did the Court forget about freedom of expression? European Journal of Risk Regulation, (3), 2014. @article{,
title = {Google Spain v. Gonz\'{a}lez: Did the Court forget about freedom of expression?}, author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius and S. Kulk}, url = {http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2491486}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-10-30}, journal = {European Journal of Risk Regulation}, number = {3}, abstract = { In this note we discuss the controversial judgment in Google Spain v. González of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Our focus is on the judgment’s implications for freedom of expression. First, the facts of the case and the CJEU’s judgment are summarised. We then argue that the CJEU did not give enough attention to the right to freedom of expression. By seeing a search engine operator as a controller regarding the processing of personal data on third party web pages, the CJEU assigns the operator the delicate task of balancing the fundamental rights at stake. However, such an operator may not be the most appropriate party to balance the rights of all involved parties, in particular in cases where such a balance is hard to strike. Furthermore, it is a departure from human rights doctrine that according to the CJEU privacy and data protection rights override, “as a rule”, the public’s right to receive information. In addition, after the judgement it has become unclear whether search engine operators have a legal basis for indexing websites that contain special categories of data. We also discuss steps taken by Google to comply with the judgment. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} }
In this note we discuss the controversial judgment in Google Spain v. González of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Our focus is on the judgment’s implications for freedom of expression. First, the facts of the case and the CJEU’s judgment are summarised. We then argue that the CJEU did not give enough attention to the right to freedom of expression. By seeing a search engine operator as a controller regarding the processing of personal data on third party web pages, the CJEU assigns the operator the delicate task of balancing the fundamental rights at stake. However, such an operator may not be the most appropriate party to balance the rights of all involved parties, in particular in cases where such a balance is hard to strike. Furthermore, it is a departure from human rights doctrine that according to the CJEU privacy and data protection rights override, “as a rule”, the public’s right to receive information. In addition, after the judgement it has become unclear whether search engine operators have a legal basis for indexing websites that contain special categories of data. We also discuss steps taken by Google to comply with the judgment.
|
| Dommering, E.
Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 7 maart 2014 2014. @misc{,
title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 7 maart 2014}, author = {E.J. Dommering}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2014_379.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-10-14}, journal = {NJ}, number = {40}, pages = {4816-4818.}, abstract = { Klacht over een column in \textit{NJB } van een Advocaat-Generaal bij de Hoge Raad, redacteur van \textit{NJB}, over mensenrechtschendingen in Rusland in verband met de onteigening van het olieconcern Yukos. Deze column zou de onafhankelijkheid van de rechterlijke macht schaden, omdat over deze onteigeningen ten tijde van de column procedures in Nederland liepen. De klacht op grond van artikel 13a RO wordt afgewezen, omdat dit een te vergaande beperking van de vrijheid van meningsuiting van een lid van de rechterlijke macht zou zijn. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} }
Klacht over een column in NJB van een Advocaat-Generaal bij de Hoge Raad, redacteur van NJB, over mensenrechtschendingen in Rusland in verband met de onteigening van het olieconcern Yukos. Deze column zou de onafhankelijkheid van de rechterlijke macht schaden, omdat over deze onteigeningen ten tijde van de column procedures in Nederland liepen. De klacht op grond van artikel 13a RO wordt afgewezen, omdat dit een te vergaande beperking van de vrijheid van meningsuiting van een lid van de rechterlijke macht zou zijn.
|
| Dommering, E.
Meningsuiting of oproep tot terreur, waar ligt de grens? 2014. @periodical{,
title = {Meningsuiting of oproep tot terreur, waar ligt de grens?}, author = {E.J. Dommering}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Parool_23082014.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-08-28}, journal = {Het Parool}, pages = {6.}, note = { Interview 23 augustus 2014. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {periodical} } |
| Dommering, E., Nieuwenhuis, A., van Eijk, N.
2014. @misc{,
title = {Haatboek blijft splijtzwam}, author = {N.A.N.M. van Eijk and E.J. Dommering and A.J. Nieuwenhuis}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1475.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-08-27}, abstract = { 27 jaar na de laatste uitspraak wordt een Amsterdamse antiquaar strafrechtelijk vervolgd voor de verkoop van Hitlers boek Mein Kampf. Vier overwegingen die wetenschap en politiek nog altijd verdelen. }, note = { Interview in Het Parool, 26 augustus 2014. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} }
27 jaar na de laatste uitspraak wordt een Amsterdamse antiquaar strafrechtelijk vervolgd voor de verkoop van Hitlers boek Mein Kampf. Vier overwegingen die wetenschap en politiek nog altijd verdelen.
|
| Dommering, E.
Annotatie bij EHRM 13 juli 2012 (Raëlien / Zwitserland) 2014. @misc{,
title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 13 juli 2012 (Ra\"{e}lien / Zwitserland)}, author = {E.J. Dommering}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/NJ_2014_319.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-08-14}, journal = {NJ}, number = {31}, pages = {4074-4075}, abstract = { Poster niet toegestaan, omdat deze verwees naar een website van een religieuze beweging met mogelijk (voor minderjarigen) zedenkwetsend materiaal. Minderheid acht dit een ongeoorloofde toegangsbelemmering van internet, meerderheid (met een stem verschil) niet. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} }
Poster niet toegestaan, omdat deze verwees naar een website van een religieuze beweging met mogelijk (voor minderjarigen) zedenkwetsend materiaal. Minderheid acht dit een ongeoorloofde toegangsbelemmering van internet, meerderheid (met een stem verschil) niet.
|