Copyright Content Moderation in the European Union: State of the Art, Ways Forward and Policy Recommendations external link

Quintais, J., Katzenbach, C., Schwemer, S., Dergacheva, D., Riis, T., Mezei, P., Harkai, I. & Magalhães, J.C.
IIC, vol. 55, pp: 157-177, 2024

Abstract

This Opinion describes and summarises the results of the interdisciplinary research carried out by the authors during the course of a three-year project on intermediaries’ practices regarding copyright content moderation. This research includes the mapping of the EU legal framework and intermediaries’ practices regarding copyright content moderation, the evaluation and measuring of the impact of moderation practices and technologies on access and diversity, and a set of policy recommendations. Our recommendations touch on the following topics: the definition of “online content-sharing service provider”; the recognition and operationalisation of user rights; the complementary nature of complaint and redress safeguards; the scope of permissible preventive filtering; the clarification of the relationship between Art. 17 of the new Copyright Directive and the Digital Services Act; monetisation and restrictive content moderation actions; recommender systems and copyright content moderation; transparency and data access for researchers; trade secret protection and transparency of content moderation systems; the relationship between the copyright acquis, the Digital Services Act and the upcoming Artificial Intelligence Act; and human competences in copyright content moderation.

Content moderation, Copyright, Digital Services Act (DSA), Digital Single Market, intermediaries, Platforms

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

EU copyright law round up – fourth trimester of 2023 external link

Trapova, A. & Quintais, J.
Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2024

Artificial intelligence, Copyright, EU

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

A first look at the copyright relevant parts in the final AI Act compromise external link

Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2023

AI Act, Copyright

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Artificiële Intelligentie: waar is de werkelijkheid gebleven? download

Computerrecht, iss. : 6, num: 258, pp: 476-483, 2023

Abstract

Er is veel ophef ontstaan over de (te) snelle toepassing van AI in de samenleving. Dit artikel onderzoekt wat AI (in het bijzonder ChatGPT) is. Vervolgens laat het zien waar de invoering van AI al direct wringt in de gebieden van het auteursrecht, de privacy, vrijheid van meningsuiting, openbare besluitvorming en mededingingsrecht. Daarna wordt stilgestaan bij de vraag of de AI-verordening van de EU daar het antwoord op zal zijn. De conclusie is dat dat maar zeer ten dele zo is. Bescherming zal dus moeten komen van normen uit de deelgebieden. Het artikel formuleert tot slot vier beginselen die in ieder deelgebied een AI ‘metakader’ kunnen vormen waarmee een AI-product moet worden beoordeeld.

Artificial intelligence

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Generative AI and copyright: Convergence of opt-outs? external link

Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2023

convergence, Copyright, Generative AI, Text and Data Mining (TDM)

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Public interest content on audiovisual platforms: access and findability download

McGonagle, T., Bosch, L. van den, Buijs, D., Huang, M., Nazarski, M., Fahy, R., Poort, J. & Ulasiuk, I.
2023

audiovisual content, Media law, public interests

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Opinie: De DSA en desinformatie: meer dan censuur alleen download

Mediaforum, num: 5, pp: 157, 2023

censuur, Digital Services Act (DSA)

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Generative AI and Author Remuneration

IIC, vol. 54, pp: 1535-1560, 2023

Abstract

With the evolution of generative AI systems, machine-made productions in the literary and artistic field have reached a level of refinement that allows them to replace human creations. The increasing sophistication of AI systems will inevitably disrupt the market for human literary and artistic works. Generative AI systems provide literary and artistic output much faster and cheaper. It is therefore foreseeable that human authors will be exposed to substitution effects. They may lose income as they are replaced by machines in sectors ranging from journalism and writing to music and visual arts. Considering this trend, the question arises whether it is advisable to take measures to compensate human authors for the reduction in their market share and income. Copyright law could serve as a tool to introduce an AI levy system and ensure the payment of equitable remuneration. In combination with mandatory collective rights management, the new revenue stream could be used to finance social and cultural funds that improve the working and living conditions of flesh-and-blood authors.

collective rights management, Copyright, Freedom of expression, Text and Data Mining (TDM), three-step test

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Herberekening reserveprijzen download

Kerste, M., Kuczynski, A., Poort, J. & Tieben, B.
2023

Abstract

SEO-notitie: 2023-19

radio, vergunningen

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Reciprociteit bij bescherming vormgeving na RAAP: Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 31 maart 2023 (Kwantum / Vitra) download

Berichten Industriële Eigendom, iss. : 4, num: 10, pp: 221-223, 2023

Intellectual property, reciprociteit, vormgeving

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib