Publications
Top Keywords
- Art. 10 EVRM (25)
- Art. 17 CDSM Directive (13)
- Artificial intelligence (72)
- Big data (12)
- Constitutional and administrative law (11)
- Consumer law (11)
- Content moderation (22)
- Copyright (191)
- Cybersecurity (10)
- Data protection (29)
- Data protection law (11)
- Digital Services Act (DSA) (32)
- Digital Single Market (13)
- EU (19)
- EU law (26)
- Europe (12)
- European Union (10)
- Fake news (14)
- Freedom of expression (46)
- Fundamental rights (18)
- GDPR (22)
- Human rights (31)
- Intellectual property (29)
- Internet (24)
- Journalism (15)
- Kluwer Information Law Series (43)
- Licensing (13)
- Media law (28)
- Online platforms (20)
- Patent law (20)
- Personal data (35)
- Platforms (24)
- Privacy (326)
- Regulation (12)
- Social media (11)
- Software (10)
- Surveillance (11)
- Text and Data Mining (TDM) (20)
- Trademark law (13)
- Transparency (19)
From Encryption to Quantum Computing – The Governance of Information Security and Human Rights external link
Brave New World: Out-Of-Court Dispute Settlement Bodies and the Struggle to Adjudicate Platforms in Europe external link
Hopeful Times, Black Futures, and Things Quantum Technologies Tell about International Institutions external link
Prompts tussen vorm en inhoud: de eerste rechtspraak over generatieve AI en het werk download
Abstract
Kan het gebruik van generatieve AI-systemen een auteursrechtelijk beschermd werk opleveren? Twee jaar na de introductie van Dall-E en ChatGPT begint zich enige jurisprudentie te vormen. Daarbij is de kernvraag of het aansturen van dergelijke systemen door middel van prompts (instructies) voldoende is om de output als ‘werk’
te kwalificeren. Dit artikel gaat, mede aan de hand van de vroegste rechtspraak in de Verenigde Staten, China en Europa, dieper in op deze lastige kwestie.
Links
Artificial intelligence, Copyright
RIS
Bibtex
Private copying levies, broadcasters and the principle of equal treatment – C-260/22 Seven.One Entertainment Group v Corint Media external link
Gederfd woongenot: Een exploratief onderzoek naar gederfd woongenot als gevolg van aardbevingen en aardbevingsrisico’s in Groningen download
Algorithmic propagation: How the data-platform regulatory framework may increase bias in content moderation external link
Abstract
This chapter offers a reflection on the topic of content moderation and bias mitigation measures in copyright law. It explores the possible links between conditional data access regimes and content moderation performed through data-intensive technologies such as fingerprinting and machine learning algorithms. In recent years, various pressing questions surrounding automated decision-making and their legal implications materialised. In European Union (EU) law, answers were provided through different regulatory interventions often based on specific legal categories, rights, and foundations contributing to the increasing complexity of interacting frameworks. Within this broader background, the chapter discusses whether current EU copyright rules may have the effect of favouring what we call the propagation of bias present in input data to the output algorithmic tools employed for content moderation. The chapter shows that a reduced availability and transparency of training data often leads to negative effects on access, verification and replication of results. These are ideal conditions for the development of bias and other types of systematic errors to the detriment of users' rights. The chapter discusses a number of options that could be employed to mitigate this undesirable effect and contextually preserve the many fundamental rights at stake.
RIS
Bibtex
The independence of media regulatory authorities ‘on the books’ and ‘on the ground’
Abstract
Independent regulatory authorities are the default choice for regulatory governance in European countries’ audiovisual media sector. Pursuant to European Union law and the standard setting of the Council of Europe, Member States should create conditions for the effective functioning of independent regulatory authorities. The 2018 revision of the EU’s Audiovisual Media Services Directive contains an obligation to designate independent regulatory authorities. Research on independent regulatory authorities suggests that the relationship between higher levels of formal independence (‘on the books’) and actual independence (‘on the ground’) is not linear. Put differently, there are limits to institutional engineering via prescriptive legislation because other factors external to the law play out decisively for regulators’ actual independence. This chapter will explore the research and the practice of independent regulatory authorities in European countries’ audiovisual media sector. The empirical basis is country-level and comparative surveys on independent media supervisory authorities in European countries.
Links
Audiovisual Media Services Directive, Council of Europe, European regulation, Independent Regulatory Authorities, media governance