The freedom of expression contours of copyright in the digital era: A European perspective

Journal of World Intellectual Property , vol. 19, iss. : 3-4, pp: 115-130, 2016

Abstract

This paper analyses the influence of the right to freedom of expression and information on European copyright law in the digital context. Drawing on the practice of the two major European courts—the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)—it begins by exploring how this fundamental right shapes both the scope of copyright protection in Europe and what is traditionally termed as “exceptions and limitations” to exclusive rights. Specifically, a long-standing practice of the ECtHR, in accordance with which copyright in turn may be viewed as an exception to freedom of expression and must hence be narrowly interpreted, is scrutinized. On a related note, a recent recourse by the CJEU to the language of “users' rights” is examined, inasmuch as it allows for a reconceptualization—in a normative framework of freedom of information—of copyright “exceptions” not as the exceptions as such, but as the equal rights of users of protected subject-matter. In this regard, the locus standi of “mere users” of online content and the somewhat diverging approaches of the Strasbourg and Luxemburg courts toward granting thereof are addressed. The paper then turns to discuss the recent recourse by the European courts to freedom of expression as a means to define the role of internet service providers in digital copyright enforcement, implicating issues ranging from the providers' liability in respect of the third-party content posted online to the often far-reaching injunctions imposed on non-liable intermediaries. Several conclusions are drawn from the above analysis, reflecting on the potential of freedom of expression and information to inform the development of European standards applicable in the field of digital copyright.

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Oneerlijke handelspraktijken: alternatief voor privacyhandhaving external link

Mediaforum, num: 4, pp: 102-109., 2016

Abstract

Privacyhandhaving vindt in Europa vrijwel uitsluitend plaats door nationale privacytoezichthouders. Zij passen primair sectorspecifieke regulering toe gebaseerd op de Europese Privacyrichtlijn.2 De verantwoordelijkheid ligt primair bij de onafhankelijke nationale privacytoezichthouders. In de Verenigde Staten wordt op federaal niveau privacy vooral gehandhaafd door de Federal Trade Commission op basis van algemene regels inzake misleidende en oneerlijke handelspraktijken. In dit artikel wordt het Amerikaanse systeem besproken en naast de Europese kaders gezet. Hieruit blijkt dat ook in Europa de regels over handelspraktijken kunnen worden ingezet voor privacyhandhaving. Er zijn goede argumenten om dit ook te doen: veel fricties betreffen het op markt/consumenten-gericht gebruik van persoonsgegevens. Het ligt dan voor de hand om deze fricties dan ook binnen markt/consument kaders aan de orde te stellen.

frontpage, Grondrechten, Privacy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

The Best of Both Worlds? Free Trade in Services and EU Law on Privacy and Data Protection external link

European Data Protection Law Review, num: 2, pp: 191-208., 2016

Abstract

The article focuses on the interplay between European Union (EU) law on privacy and data protection and international trade law, in particular the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and the WTO dispute settlement system. The argument distinguishes between the effects of international trade law in the EU legal order on the one hand, and, on the other hand, how EU data protection law would fare in a hypothetical challenge under the GATS. The contribution will apply international trade law and the general exception in GATS Article XIV to typical requirements stemming from EU data protection law, especially on transfers of personal data to third countries. The article enumerates the specific legal risks for defending EU law on privacy and data protection and explains the practical implications of its hypothetical challenge under the GATS. These insights could be useful for the EU’s negotiators of the future bi- or multilateral free trade agreements, notably the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and the Trade in Services Agreement.

frontpage, Grondrechten, Privacy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Survey and data gathering to support the Impact Assessment of a possible new legislative proposal concerning Directive 2010/13/EU (AVMSD) and in particular the provisions on media freedom, public interest and access for disabled people external link

2016

Abstract

The current EU rules on the independence of audiovisual media regulators (Article 30 AVMSD) have little to no impact on the actual performance of regulators, which are under the discretion of MS. […] [E]stablishment of concrete requirements have the largest potential for <em>de facto </em>safeguarding independence of regulators and thus more effective transposition of the AVMSD and the preservation of free and pluralistic media.

frontpage

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Privacy van consumenten external link

frontpage, Grondrechten, Privacy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Study of fundamental rights limitations for online enforcement through self-regulation external link

frontpage, Grondrechten, handhaving, zelfregulering

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Informed Consent. We Can Do Better to Defend Privacy external link

IEEE Security & Privacy, num: 2, pp: 103-107., 2016

frontpage, Grondrechten, Privacy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Inzage in de minuten van de asielprocedure: persoonsgegevens of geen persoonsgegevens? HvJEU, Y.S. en M. en S. tegen Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel (C-141/12 en C-373/12) external link

Asiel en Migrantenrecht, num: 7, 2016

frontpage, Grondrechten, Privacy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Access to Personal Data and the Right to Good Governance during Asylum Procedures after the CJEU’s YS. and M. and S. judgment (C-141/12 and C-372/12) external link

European Journal of Migration and Law, num: 2-3, pp: 259-272., 2016

Abstract

In the YS. and M. and S. judgment, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on three procedures in which Dutch judges asked for clarification on the right of asylum seekers to have access to the documents regarding the decision on asylum applications. The judgment is relevant for interpreting the concept of personal data and the scope of the right of access under the Data Protection Directive, and the right to good administration in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. At first glance, the judgment seems disappointing from the viewpoint of individual rights. Nevertheless, in our view the judgment provides sufficient grounds for effective access rights to the minutes in future asylum cases.

frontpage, Grondrechten

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

‘Rechtspraak moet wennen aan nieuwe techniek’ external link

De Ingenieur, num: juni, pp: 28-30., 2016

Abstract

Een voorstel voor een nieuwe ingrijpende afluisterwet zet het privacydebat in Nederland weer op scherp. Maar prof. dr. Nico van Eijk denkt dat rechters het gebruik van gegevens in goede banen zullen leiden. 'Ik ben voorstander van een speciale kamer bij de rechtbank voor aftapverzoeken.'

frontpage, Grondrechten, Privacy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib