IVIR and the Digital Methods Initiative of UvA's Media Studies department have won a grant from the University of California's Berkely Center for Law and Technology.

Public sector bodies are viewed as key sources of open data. Governments around the world have made opening up data a priority and an integral part of their wider open government agendas. However, there are widespread concerns that releasing government data sets with personal information threatens privacy and related rights and interests.

The project Reconciling Fair Information Principles and Open Data policies examines this tension between open data policy and privacy norms. Legal analysis will be informed by results of state-of-the-art digital research methods. The empirical study will highlight which actors (e.g. government, civil society, private sector) are talking about open data and privacy, what issues they are concerned about, and how these issues are being presented

See the award announcement at http://www.law.berkeley.edu/17848.htm
 

IVIR and the Digital Methods Initiative of UvA's Media Studies department have won a grant from the University of California's Berkely Center for Law and Technology.

Public sector bodies are viewed as key sources of open data. Governments around the world have made opening up data a priority and an integral part of their wider open government agendas. However, there are widespread concerns that releasing government data sets with personal information threatens privacy and related rights and interests.

The project Reconciling Fair Information Principles and Open Data policies examines this tension between open data policy and privacy norms. Legal analysis will be informed by results of state-of-the-art digital research methods. The empirical study will highlight which actors (e.g. government, civil society, private sector) are talking about open data and privacy, what issues they are concerned about, and how these issues are being presented

See the award announcement at http://www.law.berkeley.edu/17848.htm
 

Axel Arnbak, his supervisor Nico van Eijk and co-authors Hadi Asghari and Michel van Eeten at Delft University of Technology have published a centerpiece of Axel's doctoral project in the Communications of the ACM. The article has been downloaded over 25.000 times in the first two weeks after its publication. Visual artist Willow Brugh, Axel's colleague at the Berkman Center at Harvard University, has made a mesmerizing vizthink animation as a teaser to the article:

 

 

A.M. Arnbak, H. Asghari, M. van Eeten, N.A.N.M. van Eijk, Security Collapse in the HTTPS Market, Communications of the ACM, 2014-10, vol. 57, p. 47-55.
Also published in: ACM Queue – Security, 2014-8, vol. 12.

Abstract: 
HTTPS (Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure) has evolved into the de facto standard for secure Web browsing. However, widely reported security incidents—such as DigiNotar's breach, Apple's #gotofail, and OpenSSL's Heartbleed—have exposed systemic security vulnerabilities of HTTPS to a global audience. The Edward Snowden revelations—notably around operation BULLRUN, MUSCULAR, and the lesser-known FLYING PIG program to query certificate metadata on a dragnet scale—have driven the point home that HTTPS is both a major target of government hacking and eavesdropping, as well as an effective measure against dragnet content surveillance when Internet traffic traverses global networks. HTTPS, in short, is an absolutely critical but fundamentally flawed cybersecurity technology.

To evaluate both legal and technological solutions to augment the security of HTTPS, our article argues that an understanding of the economic incentives of the stakeholders in the HTTPS ecosystem, most notably the CAs, is essential. We outlines the systemic vulnerabilities of HTTPS, maps the thriving market for certificates, and analyzes the suggested regulatory and technological solutions on both sides of the Atlantic. The findings show existing yet surprising market patterns and perverse incentives: not unlike the financial sector, the HTTPS market is full of information asymmetries and negative externalities, as a handful of CAs dominate the market and have become "too big to fail." Unfortunately, proposed E.U. legislation will reinforce systemic vulnerabilities, and the proposed technological solutions that mostly originate in the U.S. are far from being adopted at scale. The systemic vulnerabilities in this crucial technology are likely to persist for years to come.

Axel Arnbak, his supervisor Nico van Eijk and co-authors Hadi Asghari and Michel van Eeten at Delft University of Technology have published a centerpiece of Axel's doctoral project in the Communications of the ACM. The article has been downloaded over 25.000 times in the first two weeks after its publication. Visual artist Willow Brugh, Axel's colleague at the Berkman Center at Harvard University, has made a mesmerizing vizthink animation as a teaser to the article:

 

 

A.M. Arnbak, H. Asghari, M. van Eeten, N.A.N.M. van Eijk, Security Collapse in the HTTPS Market, Communications of the ACM, 2014-10, vol. 57, p. 47-55.
Also published in: ACM Queue – Security, 2014-8, vol. 12.

Abstract: 
HTTPS (Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure) has evolved into the de facto standard for secure Web browsing. However, widely reported security incidents—such as DigiNotar's breach, Apple's #gotofail, and OpenSSL's Heartbleed—have exposed systemic security vulnerabilities of HTTPS to a global audience. The Edward Snowden revelations—notably around operation BULLRUN, MUSCULAR, and the lesser-known FLYING PIG program to query certificate metadata on a dragnet scale—have driven the point home that HTTPS is both a major target of government hacking and eavesdropping, as well as an effective measure against dragnet content surveillance when Internet traffic traverses global networks. HTTPS, in short, is an absolutely critical but fundamentally flawed cybersecurity technology.

To evaluate both legal and technological solutions to augment the security of HTTPS, our article argues that an understanding of the economic incentives of the stakeholders in the HTTPS ecosystem, most notably the CAs, is essential. We outlines the systemic vulnerabilities of HTTPS, maps the thriving market for certificates, and analyzes the suggested regulatory and technological solutions on both sides of the Atlantic. The findings show existing yet surprising market patterns and perverse incentives: not unlike the financial sector, the HTTPS market is full of information asymmetries and negative externalities, as a handful of CAs dominate the market and have become "too big to fail." Unfortunately, proposed E.U. legislation will reinforce systemic vulnerabilities, and the proposed technological solutions that mostly originate in the U.S. are far from being adopted at scale. The systemic vulnerabilities in this crucial technology are likely to persist for years to come.

On Friday 19 September 2014 at 16.00, Natali Helberger, appointed Professor of Information Law, will deliver her inaugural lecture at the Aula der Universiteit, Singel 411 in Amsterdam.

Media and users: towards a new balance

In the digital media environment user attention is scarce and competition for ‘eyeballs’ is fierce. Profiling and targeting users with customized news and advertisements is widely seen as a solution, and part of a larger trend to invest in what the New York Times has called ‘smart new strategies for growing our audience’. The shift from public information intermediary to personal information service creates new dynamics but also new imbalances in the relationship between the media and their users. In my inaugural speech I will state that to restore the balance, the media and regulators in Brussels and The Hague need to develop a vision of how to deal with issues such as media user privacy, editorial integrity and more generally ‘fair algorithmic media practices’."
 

On Friday 19 September 2014 at 16.00, Natali Helberger, appointed Professor of Information Law, will deliver her inaugural lecture at the Aula der Universiteit, Singel 411 in Amsterdam.

Media and users: towards a new balance

In the digital media environment user attention is scarce and competition for ‘eyeballs’ is fierce. Profiling and targeting users with customized news and advertisements is widely seen as a solution, and part of a larger trend to invest in what the New York Times has called ‘smart new strategies for growing our audience’. The shift from public information intermediary to personal information service creates new dynamics but also new imbalances in the relationship between the media and their users. In my inaugural speech I will state that to restore the balance, the media and regulators in Brussels and The Hague need to develop a vision of how to deal with issues such as media user privacy, editorial integrity and more generally ‘fair algorithmic media practices’."
 

Het Instituut voor Informatierecht is zeer verheugd dat de VENI subsidieaanvraag van onze senior onderzoeker Stef van Gompel is gehonoreerd door NWO.

The challenge of evidence-based intellectual property law reform: Legal pragmatism meets doctrinal legal reasoning

Intellectual property (IP) is an important instrument of innovation, cultural and growth policies. A key trend in the quest for “better” IP lawmaking is to base policies and their elaboration into effective legal norms on empirical (economic) evidence. Today’s IP laws, however, are still the result of a more doctrinal approach, giving consideration primarily to coherence and formal consistency with legal-theoretical foundations. Arguably, an increased focus on evidence-based policy requires a more legal pragmatic approach to IP lawmaking. This research explores how a legal pragmatic approach can best be reconciled with the prevailing doctrinal approach to IP lawmaking in a way that combines the strengths of both approaches, and curtails their weaknesses. In so doing, the research aims to improve the quality of IP lawmaking and further the progress and development of IP law.

To identify and assess ways in which evidence-based lawmaking can be integrated in IP reform, this project will situate evidence-based policy in conflicting theories and practices of legal doctrinalism and pragmatism in IP law. This requires comparative legal research and a multidisciplinary literature review. Furthermore, two IP case studies shall be conducted to analyze doctrinal and pragmatic legal reasoning at work and qualitative interviews will be held with IP lawmakers to assess what challenges they encounter bringing evidence-based lawmaking in practice. The research will not only contribute to the theoretical foundations of evidence-based IP lawmaking, but also benefit IP lawmakers, creative industries and other actors involved in the IP lawmaking process through the development of guidelines and best practices for implementing evidence-based policy in IP lawmaking.

Het Instituut voor Informatierecht is zeer verheugd dat de VENI subsidieaanvraag van onze senior onderzoeker Stef van Gompel is gehonoreerd door NWO.

The challenge of evidence-based intellectual property law reform: Legal pragmatism meets doctrinal legal reasoning

Intellectual property (IP) is an important instrument of innovation, cultural and growth policies. A key trend in the quest for “better” IP lawmaking is to base policies and their elaboration into effective legal norms on empirical (economic) evidence. Today’s IP laws, however, are still the result of a more doctrinal approach, giving consideration primarily to coherence and formal consistency with legal-theoretical foundations. Arguably, an increased focus on evidence-based policy requires a more legal pragmatic approach to IP lawmaking. This research explores how a legal pragmatic approach can best be reconciled with the prevailing doctrinal approach to IP lawmaking in a way that combines the strengths of both approaches, and curtails their weaknesses. In so doing, the research aims to improve the quality of IP lawmaking and further the progress and development of IP law.

To identify and assess ways in which evidence-based lawmaking can be integrated in IP reform, this project will situate evidence-based policy in conflicting theories and practices of legal doctrinalism and pragmatism in IP law. This requires comparative legal research and a multidisciplinary literature review. Furthermore, two IP case studies shall be conducted to analyze doctrinal and pragmatic legal reasoning at work and qualitative interviews will be held with IP lawmakers to assess what challenges they encounter bringing evidence-based lawmaking in practice. The research will not only contribute to the theoretical foundations of evidence-based IP lawmaking, but also benefit IP lawmakers, creative industries and other actors involved in the IP lawmaking process through the development of guidelines and best practices for implementing evidence-based policy in IP lawmaking.

Google Spain / AEPD, European Court of Justice, 13 May 2014.

'Het word een drama, een eeuwigdurende hel', Foliaweb, 20 januari 2015

Frederik Borgesius & Stefan Kulk

• De implicaties van het Google Spain-arrest voor de vrijheid van meningsuiting, NJCM-Bulletin, 2015-1, p. 3-19.

Nico van Eijk:

• European Ruling On Removing Google Links May Leave a Mess, National Public Radio, 16 May 2014. You can listen to the story here.
• Om niet te vergeten, Opinie, Mediaforum, 2014-6, p. 157.
• Hof negeert uitingsvrijheid, Commentaar bij L. Moerel, Google maakt het middel erger dan de kwaal door te melden dat er iets is verwijderd, Netkwesties, 2 september 2014.

Egbert Dommering:

• Kan Google het vergeetrecht nog aanvechten?, Computerworld, 22 januari 2015.
• Straks verwijdert Google alle oude informatie, Opinie, NRC Handelsblad, 17 mei 2014.

Ot van Daalen:

• Google moet resultaten wissen, NOS Journaal, 13 mei 2014;
• Jezelf Googelen, misschien minder pijnlijk?, NOS op 3, 13 mei 2014;
• EU-hof: zoekmachines moeten resultaten verwijderen bij privacy-inbreuk, Tweakers, 13 mei 2014;
• U kunt Google vragen slechte verhalen over u te weren, RTLXL, 13 mei 2014.
• Google moet links gaan verwijderen. Wat betekent dat?, De Correspondent, 15 mei 2014.

Axel Arnbak:

• Burger heeft recht om vergeten te worden, De Volkskrant, 14 mei 2014.

Joris van Hoboken:

• Gaat de Google-uitspraak écht het Internet slopen? We vroegen het een expert, Motherboard, 21 mei 2014;
• Data protection agencies gain power from Google defeat, Financial Times, 14 mei 2014;
• 'Recht om vergeten te worden': reden voor feestje?, De Volkskrant, 13 mei 2014.

Google Spain / AEPD, European Court of Justice, 13 May 2014.

'Het word een drama, een eeuwigdurende hel', Foliaweb, 20 januari 2015

Frederik Borgesius & Stefan Kulk

• De implicaties van het Google Spain-arrest voor de vrijheid van meningsuiting, NJCM-Bulletin, 2015-1, p. 3-19.

Nico van Eijk:

• European Ruling On Removing Google Links May Leave a Mess, National Public Radio, 16 May 2014. You can listen to the story here.
• Om niet te vergeten, Opinie, Mediaforum, 2014-6, p. 157.
• Hof negeert uitingsvrijheid, Commentaar bij L. Moerel, Google maakt het middel erger dan de kwaal door te melden dat er iets is verwijderd, Netkwesties, 2 september 2014.

Egbert Dommering:

• Kan Google het vergeetrecht nog aanvechten?, Computerworld, 22 januari 2015.
• Straks verwijdert Google alle oude informatie, Opinie, NRC Handelsblad, 17 mei 2014.

Ot van Daalen:

• Google moet resultaten wissen, NOS Journaal, 13 mei 2014;
• Jezelf Googelen, misschien minder pijnlijk?, NOS op 3, 13 mei 2014;
• EU-hof: zoekmachines moeten resultaten verwijderen bij privacy-inbreuk, Tweakers, 13 mei 2014;
• U kunt Google vragen slechte verhalen over u te weren, RTLXL, 13 mei 2014.
• Google moet links gaan verwijderen. Wat betekent dat?, De Correspondent, 15 mei 2014.

Axel Arnbak:

• Burger heeft recht om vergeten te worden, De Volkskrant, 14 mei 2014.

Joris van Hoboken:

• Gaat de Google-uitspraak écht het Internet slopen? We vroegen het een expert, Motherboard, 21 mei 2014;
• Data protection agencies gain power from Google defeat, Financial Times, 14 mei 2014;
• 'Recht om vergeten te worden': reden voor feestje?, De Volkskrant, 13 mei 2014.