Copyright, the AI Act and Extraterritoriality download

The Lisbon Council, 2025

Abstract

The Lisbon Council launched Copyright, the AI Act and Extraterritoriality, a timely new policy brief authored by João Pedro Quintais, associate professor, Institute for Information Law, University of Amsterdam. As the European Commission is gearing up for a 2026 review of the directive on copyright in the digital single market and the code of practice for general-purpose artificial intelligence (AI), the publication offers a legally grounded overview of copyright issues across the AI lifecycle – from data training to outputs – and an analysis of how the European AI act interacts with copyright law.

AI Act, Copyright, extraterritoriality

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 8 november 2024 (Anne Frank Fonds / Anne Frank Stichting) download

Auteursrecht, iss. : 2, pp: 105-107, 2025

Abstract

Publicatie van wetenschappelijke editie van dagboek van Anne Frank op website met geoblocking-maatregelen voor Nederland. HR stelt prejudiciële vragen aan Hof van Justitie EU. Brengt mogelijkheid om geoblocking door gebruik van VPN- of soortgelijke dienst te omzeilen mee dat sprake is van mededeling aan het publiek in Nederland?

Copyright, Geoblocking

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie van de EU 24 oktober 2024 (Kwantum / Vitra) download

Auteursrecht, iss. : 2, pp: 95-97, 2025

Abstract

Auteursrechtelijke bescherming van voorwerpen van toegepaste kunst die in het land van oorsprong niet beschermd zijn door het auteursrecht. De materiële-reciprociteitstoets van art. 2(7) Berner Conventie mag door de Nederlandse rechter niet toegepast omdat het Unierecht en in het bijzonder de Auteursrechtrichtlijn 2001/29/EG niet voorziet in een beperking van de bescherming van werken van toegepaste kunst uit landen buiten de EU.

Copyright

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

The Harmonized Law of Streaming in the Eu – A Copyright and Related Rights Perspective download

Copyright Law and Streaming: A Comparative Law Analysis of Lawful and Unlawful Streaming Services, Brill/Nijhoff, 2025, pp: 95-134

Abstract

EU law does not contain a distinct set of rules seeking to regulate various types of streaming services. Instead, the harmonized rules governing streaming services follow from individual pieces of EU legislation – ranging from rules on online broadcasting to a specific liability regime for platforms allowing users to upload and share content – and decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’). The following analysis, first, provides an overview of the exclusive rights that must be taken into account in streaming scenarios. This discussion also addresses the exemption of temporary acts of copying that may cover the reception of streaming content by users (section 2). Rights clearance questions occupy centre stage in sections 3 (general services, such as Netflix) and 4 (platforms for user-generated content (‘UGC’), such as YouTube). Section 5 raises the issue of content filtering obligations in the specific legal regime for on-demand streaming of content uploaded by users. Section 6 takes a closer look at copyright limitations that may become relevant in streaming cases, including private copying rules and the exemption of quotations, parodies and pastiches. Section 7 explains the remarkable extension of the concept of ‘communication to the public’ to the provision of streaming equipment for illegal content and infrastructures for illegal file-sharing. It also examines the legal framework for website blocking. In section 8, the results of the analysis will be summarized.

Copyright

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Do AI models dream of dolphins in lake Balaton? external link

Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2025

Artificial intelligence, Copyright

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

A new liability paradigm for online platforms in EU copyright law download

Governance of Digital Single Market Actors, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2025, ISBN: 9781839101472

Abstract

This chapter explores the transformative impact of art. 17 of the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive on the liability of online content-sharing platforms and its potential impact on users’ rights and freedoms. The analysis traces the evolution of EU copyright law to delineate the legal framework for primary and secondary liability of such platforms leading up to the introduction of art. 17. It then examines the new regime, explaining how it reflects a departure from prior rules and constitutes a novel liability paradigm tailored for online content-sharing platforms. The chapter contends that this shift, in line with the Digital Services Act's (DSA) “enhanced responsibility” approach, entails important trade-offs. It presents challenges to legal certainty, given the complexity of art. 17 and its potential overlaps with the DSA. Moreover, the legal design of art. 17 and the DSA may lead to privatised algorithmic content moderation, outsourcing fundamental rights balancing to platforms and users, risking users’ freedom of expression. The Court of Justice's ruling in Case C-401/19 Poland v Parliament and Council is discussed as illustrative of this shift, to the extent it affirms art. 17's liability design without sufficiently addressing associated fundamental rights risks.

Copyright, liability, Online platforms

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

New Book Explores Collective Management of Copyright in the Digital Age external link

Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2025

collective management, Copyright

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Copyright Liability and Generative AI: What’s the Way Forward? download

Nordic Intellectual Property Law Review, iss. : 1, pp: 92-115, 2025

Abstract

The intersection of copyright liability and generative AI has become one of the most complex and debated issues in the field of copyright law. AI systems have advanced significantly to allow the creation of fantastic new content but they are also capable of producing outputs that evoke, adapt, or recreate content that is protected by copyright law, sparking several infringement proceedings against AI companies, particularly in the US. With this rapid evolution comes the need to re-examine existing legal frameworks and theories. In this contribution, I would like to focus on liability challenges at the output stage of AI content generation and share some insights from Sweden to finally ponder about possible paths forward.

Artificial intelligence, Copyright, Generative AI, liability

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

The TDM Opt-Out in the EU – Five Problems, One Solution external link

Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2025

Copyright, Text and Data Mining (TDM)

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

EU copyright law roundup – first trimester of 2025 external link

Trapova, A. & Quintais, J.
Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2025

Copyright

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib