Music streaming debates 2025 roundup: wrap-up for the streaming services as we know them? – Part 1 external link

Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2025

Copyright, music, streaming services

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Reconciling EU Copyright Protection With the Right to Research: Why We Need a General Research Exemption (Now!) external link

Verfassungsblog, 2025

Copyright, right to research

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

The Obligations of Providers of General-Purpose AI Models external link

Fortcoming in: Zanfir Fortuna, Malgieri, González Fuster and Mantelero (eds.) The Artificial Intelligence Act — A Thematic Commentary, Hart Publishing, 2026. This version: November , 2025

Abstract

During the legislative process, the EU Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act was amended to include provisions related to general-purpose AI (GPAI) models. These broadly relate to transparency towards downstream users and relevant regulators, in addition to obligations connected to intellectual property. In this paper, we provide detailed analysis of these new provisions in the context of current technological applications and emerging trajectories, connecting them to computing literature and practice, and the broader context of connected and adjacent legal regimes, in particular copyright and relevant emerging case law. We find that there are a significant number of inclarities, tensions and contradictions both within the text, between the text and other legal regimes, and between the text and guideline documents, such as the Code of Practice on General-Purpose AI and recent guidelines by the European Commission. We identify a range of issues with the scoping of the provisions which may undermine its policy goals and create loopholes for regulatory avoidance, such as those relating to non-commercial models, open-source models, and model finetuning along the value chain. We find that the Code of Practice contains significant omissions and misstatements, some of which may present a compliance risk for an entity choosing to rely on the Code. We do not consider the provisions on GPAI models which present a systemic risk, which are dealt with elsewhere in the volume which this work will form a part of.

AI Act, code of practice, Copyright, Transparency

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Thuiskopieheffing is nog niet op haar retour external link

IE-forum, 2025

Copyright, thuiskopie

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Article 3: The Untapped Legal Basis for Europe’s Public AI Ambitions external link

Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2025

Artificial intelligence, CDSM Directive, Copyright, exceptions and limitations, Text and Data Mining (TDM)

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

EU copyright law roundup – second and third trimester of 2025 external link

Trapova, A. & Quintais, J.
Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2025

Copyright

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Are the European TDM Exceptions Applicable to GenAI Training? Despite the Three-Step Test? external link

Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2025

Copyright, GenAI, Text and Data Mining (TDM), three-step test

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Angemessene Vergütung insbesondere im Bereich Streaming und Plattform-Ökonomie/Reform des Vergütungssystems für gesetzlich erlaubte Nutzungen im Urheberrecht download

Handke, C.W., Kraetzig, V., Peukert, A., Priem, M., Senftleben, M., Izyumenko, E., Szkalej, K. & Valk, E.G.
pp: 695, 2025

Auteursrecht, platform economy, streaming services

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

An EU Copyright Framework for Research: Opinion of the European Copyright Society external link

Sganga, C., Geiger, C., Margoni, T., Senftleben, M. & van Eechoud, M.
JIPITEC, vol. 16, iss. : 2, pp: 312-326, 2025

Abstract

Research and academic freedom are at the core of the EU project. Yet, the relationship between EU copyright law and research is intricate. Research and education interests have traditionally been recognized within copyright law to some degree, however, the current EU copyright acquis is not really conducive to an effective research environment. This jeopardises the fulfilment of the EU’s ambitions in the field. Building on the pillars of action of the European Research Area (ERA) Policy Agenda 2022-2024 and its follow-up, the ECS emphasises the need for a copyright framework that fosters research, and supports the call for immediate action on the EU copyright framework to address the most pressing challenges it raises for European researchers and their institutions. This Opinion stresses the need to ensure a proper balance between IP rights, protected under Article 17(2) CFREU, and the freedom of art and science (Article 13 CFREU), coupled with the ‘right to research’, as enshrined in international legal instruments (UDHR and ICESCR), the objectives of the EU treaties, and the CFREU and ECHR. Various EU and national legal instruments are in place that facilitate access and reuse of scientific works, but these have several shortcomings. They weaken the effective balance between copyright, research policy needs, and the fulfilment of ERA policy goals, including the EU Open Science agenda. This opinion focuses on the flaws in key provisions aimed at balancing copyright and research needs: the general InfoSoc Directive research exception, the text and data mining exception of the CDSM Directive and national secondary publication rights. It also briefly assesses the interface between copyright and (research) data regulation. We propose several policy interventions to address the identified shortcomings. These include the introduction of an EU-wide secondary publication right with specific characteristics; the amendment of text and data mining exceptions; the creation of a general mandatory research exception overcoming the challenges raised by Article 5(3)(d) InfoSoc; and a more careful legislative drafting to reduce legal complexity and ensure consistency across copyright and data legislation.

Copyright, european copyright society, research

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

More Information Law Series Volumes Freely Available external link

Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2025

Copyright, information law, Kluwer Information Law Series

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib