Publications
Top Keywords
- Art. 10 EVRM (25)
- Art. 17 CDSM Directive (13)
- Artificial intelligence (72)
- Big data (12)
- Constitutional and administrative law (11)
- Consumer law (11)
- Content moderation (22)
- Copyright (188)
- Cybersecurity (10)
- Data protection (29)
- Data protection law (11)
- Digital Services Act (DSA) (32)
- Digital Single Market (13)
- EU (19)
- EU law (26)
- Europe (12)
- European Union (10)
- Fake news (14)
- Freedom of expression (46)
- Fundamental rights (18)
- GDPR (22)
- Human rights (31)
- Intellectual property (29)
- Internet (24)
- Journalism (15)
- Kluwer Information Law Series (43)
- Licensing (13)
- Media law (28)
- Online platforms (19)
- Patent law (20)
- Personal data (35)
- Platforms (24)
- Privacy (326)
- Regulation (11)
- Social media (11)
- Software (10)
- Surveillance (11)
- Text and Data Mining (TDM) (20)
- Trademark law (13)
- Transparency (19)
Kroniek Mediarecht external link
Kroniek Mediarecht external link
Annotatie bij Vzr. Rb. Overijssel 30 augustus 2013 en 2 oktober 2013 (Pretium / Wegener) external link
Freedom of Expression, the Media and Journalists: Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights external link
Abstract
This e-book provides valuable insights into the European Court of Human Rights' case-law on freedom of expression and media and journalistic freedoms. It summarises over 200 judgments or decisions by the Court and provides hyperlinks to the full text of each of the summarised judgments or decisions (via HUDOC, the Court's online case-law database).<br />
For an optimal navigational experience, one should download the e-book and read the technical tips on p. 3.
Mediarecht
RIS
Bibtex
The Independence of the Media and Its Regulatory Agencies: Shedding New Light on Formal and Actual Independence Against the National Context
Abstract
Media independence is vital for democracies, and so is the independence of the regulatory bodies governing it. The Independence of the Media and its Regulatory Agencies explores the complex relationship between media governance and independence of media regulatory authorities within Europe, which form part of the wider framework in which media’s independence may flourish or fade. Based on research in more than forty countries, the contributions analyse the independence of regulators and draw links between social, financial, and legal frameworks. The contributing authors offer theoretical perspectives that combine law and public policy; review research methods; and offer a set of case studies that explore how the national socio-political context influences local institutions. As a whole, the book offers an accessible and relevant account of research into regulatory independence as applied to the audiovisual media sector in Europe.
Mediarecht
RIS
Bibtex
Privacy and Piracy in Cyberspace: Justice for All external link
Abstract
This article is about how privacy and piracy lock horns in everyday practice. It outlines three challenges right holders and ISPs face every day, when piracy tries to hide behind privacy: uncertainty, costs and delay.
Apart from only balancing the right of privacy against the right of (intellectual) property, the author also introduces a third element: the right to effective remedy.
The article concludes that the challenge is not in the ‘if’ but in the ‘when’ and ‘how’ ISPs can be obliged to disclose personal data. This requires new research, with a more practice-oriented approach, focusing on two elements: (1) a robust uniform decision making model, allowing for a ‘fair balance between all fundamental rights’, of all stake holders involved, (‘when’); (2) such model needs to benefit from (cost-)effective procedures, to the benefit of all (‘how’).
The article also discusses recent developments in the field of IP enforcement, including the decisions from the European Court of Justice in Promusicae, LSG and Bonnier Audio.
Apart from only balancing the right of privacy against the right of (intellectual) property, the author also introduces a third element: the right to effective remedy.
The article concludes that the challenge is not in the ‘if’ but in the ‘when’ and ‘how’ ISPs can be obliged to disclose personal data. This requires new research, with a more practice-oriented approach, focusing on two elements: (1) a robust uniform decision making model, allowing for a ‘fair balance between all fundamental rights’, of all stake holders involved, (‘when’); (2) such model needs to benefit from (cost-)effective procedures, to the benefit of all (‘how’).
The article also discusses recent developments in the field of IP enforcement, including the decisions from the European Court of Justice in Promusicae, LSG and Bonnier Audio.
Grondrechten, Privacy
RIS
Bibtex
Merkenopposities in de Benelux external link
Abstract
In dit deel uit de bekende Tekst & Commentaar serie gaat de auteur in detail in op de merkenoppositie in de Benelux. Hoe instellen, waar indienen en op welke juridische basis, zijn bijvoorbeeld een aantal vragen die in dit deel aan de orde komen. Het commentaar volgt de wettelijke structuur van het Benelux Verdrag inzake de Intellectuele Eigendom. Naast de Benelux oppositie vergelijkt de auteur ook andere deelterreinen: nietigheidsprocedure bij de overheidsrechter op (dezelfde) relatieve gronden, opposities tegen Internationale Merkaanvragen en de OHIM oppositie procedure.
Industriële eigendom, Merkenrecht