Publications - Page 112 of 266

Smart TV and the online media sector: User privacy in view of changing market realities external link

Telecommunications Policy, vol. 41, num: 3, pp: 170-184, 2017

Abstract

Smart TV and online media enable precise monitoring of online media consumption, which also forms the basis for personalised recommendations. This new practice challenges EU policy in two respects. Firstly, the legality of monitoring individual media consumption and using personal data of users is primarily addressed under data protection law. Secondly, tracking of viewing behaviour and personalisation of media content can also affect individuals’ freedom to receive information, as well as the realisation of media policy objectives such as media freedom and pluralism, implications that so far are not reflected in media law and policy, or only marginally. This article addresses the increasing reliance on personal data and personalised services in the audiovisual and online media sector and queries the appropriateness of the legal status quo in light of implementation and enforcement actions in Germany and the Netherlands. The analysis concludes with a call for media policy makers and regulators to pay more attention to the issue of ‘smart surveillance’ of media users, and develops a number of concrete recommendations on how to accommodate the specific privacy concerns of media users.

Links

DOI: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2016.12.013

frontpage, Fundamental rights, Media consumption, Media policy, Monitoring, Online media, Privacy, Smart TV

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Irion, K.
AU  - Helberger, N.
PY  - 0103
DA  - 2017-01-03
T1  - Smart TV and the online media sector: User privacy in view of changing market realities
JO  - Telecommunications Policy
VL  - 41
NV  - 3
SP  - 170-184
UR  - https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Smart-TV-and-the-Online-media-sector-prepub.pdf
DO  - https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2016.12.013
AB  - Smart TV and online media enable precise monitoring of online media consumption, which also forms the basis for personalised recommendations. This new practice challenges EU policy in two respects. Firstly, the legality of monitoring individual media consumption and using personal data of users is primarily addressed under data protection law. Secondly, tracking of viewing behaviour and personalisation of media content can also affect individuals’ freedom to receive information, as well as the realisation of media policy objectives such as media freedom and pluralism, implications that so far are not reflected in media law and policy, or only marginally. This article addresses the increasing reliance on personal data and personalised services in the audiovisual and online media sector and queries the appropriateness of the legal status quo in light of implementation and enforcement actions in Germany and the Netherlands. The analysis concludes with a call for media policy makers and regulators to pay more attention to the issue of ‘smart surveillance’ of media users, and develops a number of concrete recommendations on how to accommodate the specific privacy concerns of media users.
K1  - frontpage
K1  - Fundamental rights
K1  - Media consumption
K1  - Media policy
K1  - Monitoring
K1  - Online media
K1  - Privacy
K1  - Smart TV
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Article{Irion2017,
	title = {Smart TV and the online media sector: User privacy in view of changing market realities},
	author = {Irion, K. and Helberger, N.},
	doi = {https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2016.12.013},
	year = {0103},
	date = {2017-01-03},
	journal = {Telecommunications Policy},
	volume = {41},
	number = {3},
	pages = {170-184},
	abstract = {Smart TV and online media enable precise monitoring of online media consumption, which also forms the basis for personalised recommendations. This new practice challenges EU policy in two respects. Firstly, the legality of monitoring individual media consumption and using personal data of users is primarily addressed under data protection law. Secondly, tracking of viewing behaviour and personalisation of media content can also affect individuals’ freedom to receive information, as well as the realisation of media policy objectives such as media freedom and pluralism, implications that so far are not reflected in media law and policy, or only marginally. This article addresses the increasing reliance on personal data and personalised services in the audiovisual and online media sector and queries the appropriateness of the legal status quo in light of implementation and enforcement actions in Germany and the Netherlands. The analysis concludes with a call for media policy makers and regulators to pay more attention to the issue of ‘smart surveillance’ of media users, and develops a number of concrete recommendations on how to accommodate the specific privacy concerns of media users.},
	keywords = {frontpage, Fundamental rights, Media consumption, Media policy, Monitoring, Online media, Privacy, Smart TV},
}

Save .bib

Bom onder het internet – Naschrift external link

Abstract

New technologies, purposes and applications to process individual’s personal data are developed on a massive scale. But we have not only entered the ‘golden age of personal data’ in terms of its exploitation: ours is also the ‘golden age of personal data’ in terms of regulation of its use. In this contribution, we explain how regulating the processing of an individual’s personal data can be a proxy of intervention, which directly or indirectly could benefit other individual rights and freedoms. Understood as an enabling right, the architecture of EU data protection law is capable of protecting against many of the negative short- and long-term effects of contemporary data processing. The new General Data Protection Regulation certainly strengthens aspects of this core architecture but certain regulatory innovations to cope with technological advancements and the data-driven economy appear less capably of yielding broad protection for individuals fundamental rights and freedoms. We conclude that from the perspective of protecting individual fundamental rights and freedoms, it would be worthwhile to explore alternative (legal) approaches of individual protection in contemporary data processing.

Big data, Data protection, enabling fundamental rights, EU law, General Data Protection Regulation, Privacy

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Oostveen, M.
AU  - Irion, K.
PY  - 1215
DA  - 2016-12-15
T1  - The Golden Age of Personal Data: How to Regulate an Enabling Fundamental Right?
AB  - New technologies, purposes and applications to process individual’s personal data are developed on a massive scale. But we have not only entered the ‘golden age of personal data’ in terms of its exploitation: ours is also the ‘golden age of personal data’ in terms of regulation of its use. In this contribution, we explain how regulating the processing of an individual’s personal data can be a proxy of intervention, which directly or indirectly could benefit other individual rights and freedoms. Understood as an enabling right, the architecture of EU data protection law is capable of protecting against many of the negative short- and long-term effects of contemporary data processing. The new General Data Protection Regulation certainly strengthens aspects of this core architecture but certain regulatory innovations to cope with technological advancements and the data-driven economy appear less capably of yielding broad protection for individuals fundamental rights and freedoms. We conclude that from the perspective of protecting individual fundamental rights and freedoms, it would be worthwhile to explore alternative (legal) approaches of individual protection in contemporary data processing.
K1  - Big data
K1  - Data protection
K1  - enabling fundamental rights
K1  - EU law
K1  - General Data Protection Regulation
K1  - Privacy
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Article{Oostveen2016b,
	title = {The Golden Age of Personal Data: How to Regulate an Enabling Fundamental Right?},
	author = {Oostveen, M. and Irion, K.},
	year = {1215},
	date = {2016-12-15},
	abstract = {New technologies, purposes and applications to process individual’s personal data are developed on a massive scale. But we have not only entered the ‘golden age of personal data’ in terms of its exploitation: ours is also the ‘golden age of personal data’ in terms of regulation of its use. In this contribution, we explain how regulating the processing of an individual’s personal data can be a proxy of intervention, which directly or indirectly could benefit other individual rights and freedoms. Understood as an enabling right, the architecture of EU data protection law is capable of protecting against many of the negative short- and long-term effects of contemporary data processing. The new General Data Protection Regulation certainly strengthens aspects of this core architecture but certain regulatory innovations to cope with technological advancements and the data-driven economy appear less capably of yielding broad protection for individuals fundamental rights and freedoms. We conclude that from the perspective of protecting individual fundamental rights and freedoms, it would be worthwhile to explore alternative (legal) approaches of individual protection in contemporary data processing.},
	keywords = {Big data, Data protection, enabling fundamental rights, EU law, General Data Protection Regulation, Privacy},
}

Save .bib

Bijdrage tijdens de hoorzitting van de vaste commissie voor Binnenlandse Zaken over de Wet op de inlichtingen- en veiligheidsdiensten external link

van Eijk, N.

2016

hoorzitting, Informatierecht, transparantie, waarborgen, Wet op de inlichtingen- en veiligheidsdiensten (Wiv)

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Annotatie bij Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens 12 juli 2016 (SIA AKKA/LAA / Letland) external link

Breemen, V.

European Human Rights Cases, num: 12, 2016

Abstract

Deze zaak draait om licentieovereenkomsten tussen collectieve auteursrechtenbeheersorganisatie (hierna ook: cbo) SIA AKKA/LAA en enkele Letse radiostations voor de uitzending van muziekwerken van aangesloten auteurs. Eind jaren ’90 kon met deze stations geen akkoord worden bereikt over nieuwe licenties. Vooral de hoogte van de vergoeding voor de muziekuitzending bleek daarbij een dissonant. De omroepen gingen desondanks door met uitzenden. Ze betaalden ofwel niet, ofwel een eenzijdig bepaald bedrag. SIA AKKA/LAA spande daarop twee nationale procedures aan wegens auteursrechtinbreuk en eiste schadevergoeding.

Auteursrecht, collectief rechtenbeheer muziek, eigendomsbescherming, frontpage, positieve en negatieve verplichtingen

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Breemen, V.
PY  - 1208
DA  - 2016-12-08
T1  - Annotatie bij Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens 12 juli 2016 (SIA AKKA/LAA / Letland)
JO  - European Human Rights Cases
NV  - 12
UR  - http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_EHRC_240.pdf
AB  - Deze zaak draait om licentieovereenkomsten tussen collectieve auteursrechtenbeheersorganisatie (hierna ook: cbo) SIA AKKA/LAA en enkele Letse radiostations voor de uitzending van muziekwerken van aangesloten auteurs. Eind jaren ’90 kon met deze stations geen akkoord worden bereikt over nieuwe licenties. Vooral de hoogte van de vergoeding voor de muziekuitzending bleek daarbij een dissonant. De omroepen gingen desondanks door met uitzenden. Ze betaalden ofwel niet, ofwel een eenzijdig bepaald bedrag. SIA AKKA/LAA spande daarop twee nationale procedures aan wegens auteursrechtinbreuk en eiste schadevergoeding.
K1  - Auteursrecht
K1  - collectief rechtenbeheer muziek
K1  - eigendomsbescherming
K1  - frontpage
K1  - positieve en negatieve verplichtingen
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Article{Breemen2016b,
	title = {Annotatie bij Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens 12 juli 2016 (SIA AKKA/LAA / Letland)},
	author = {Breemen, V.},
	year = {1208},
	date = {2016-12-08},
	journal = {European Human Rights Cases},
	number = {12},
	abstract = {Deze zaak draait om licentieovereenkomsten tussen collectieve auteursrechtenbeheersorganisatie (hierna ook: cbo) SIA AKKA/LAA en enkele Letse radiostations voor de uitzending van muziekwerken van aangesloten auteurs. Eind jaren ’90 kon met deze stations geen akkoord worden bereikt over nieuwe licenties. Vooral de hoogte van de vergoeding voor de muziekuitzending bleek daarbij een dissonant. De omroepen gingen desondanks door met uitzenden. Ze betaalden ofwel niet, ofwel een eenzijdig bepaald bedrag. SIA AKKA/LAA spande daarop twee nationale procedures aan wegens auteursrechtinbreuk en eiste schadevergoeding.},
	keywords = {Auteursrecht, collectief rechtenbeheer muziek, eigendomsbescherming, frontpage, positieve en negatieve verplichtingen},
}

Save .bib

Top Keywords

Abstract

Links

RIS

Bibtex

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

RIS

Bibtex

RIS

Bibtex

Abstract

RIS

Bibtex