Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 24 februari 2017 (X / Google Netherlands)

Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 24 februari 2017 (X / Google Netherlands) external link

Computerrecht, vol. 2017, num: 3, pp: 167-169, 2017

Abstract

In zijn arrest laat de Hoge Raad zich uit over hoe de rechten op privacy en gegevensbescherming zich verhouden tot het recht op vrijheid van meningsuiting.

Links

https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_Computerrecht_2017_3.pdf

annotatie, frontpage, gegevensbescherming, Privacy, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 19 oktober 2016 (Breyer / Duitsland) external link

van Eijk, N.

Tijdschrift voor Consumentenrecht en handelspraktijken, vol. 2017, num: 3, pp: 130-132, 2017

Links

https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_TvCH_2017_3.pdf

C-582/14, frontpage, internetprotocoladressen, onlinemediadiensten, Privacy, Richtlijn 95/46/EG, verwerking van persoonsgegevens

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

An Assessment of the Commission’s Proposal on Privacy and Electronic Communications external link

Zuiderveen Borgesius, F., van Hoboken, J., Fahy, R., Irion, K. & Rozendaal, M.

2017

Abstract

This study, commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the LIBE Committee, appraises the European Commission’s proposal for an ePrivacy Regulation. The study assesses whether the proposal would ensure that the right to the protection of personal data, the right to respect for private life and communications, and related rights enjoy a high standard of protection. The study also highlights the proposal’s potential benefits and drawbacks more generally.

Links

e-Privacy regulation, frontpage, Personal data, Privacy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie van de EU 21 december 2016 (Tele2 Sverige / Post- och telestyrelsen en Secretary of State for the Home Department) external link

Dommering, E.

Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, vol. 2017, num: 20/21, pp: 3042-3045, 2017

Links

https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2017_186.pdf

aanbieders, bescherming, elektronische communicatie, frontpage, locatiegegevens, nationale wettelijke regeling, Privacy, verkeersgegevens, verwerking van persoonsgegevens

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Kroniek Mediarecht external link

Breemen, V. & Breemen, V.

KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi, vol. 140, pp: 8150-8152, 2016

Links

bibliotheken, bronbescherming, e-lending, media, Privacy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Van catalogusformules en strong reasons: de ontwikkeling van de artikel 10 jurisprudentie van het EHRM van 2010 tot en met 2016 (deel I) external link

Nieuwenhuis, A.

Mediaforum, vol. 2017, num: 1, pp: 2-12, 2017

Abstract

Deze bijdrage geeft een overzicht en analyse van de jurisprudentie van het EHRM over de afgelopen zeven jaar. Daarbij wordt eerst kort ingegaan op de reikwijdte en beperkingsvoorwaarden, waarna de behandeling een meer thematisch karakter krijgt. Zo passeren onder meer ‘persvrijheid en privacy’, ‘uitlatingen over rechtszaken’, en ‘hate speech’ de revue. In dit nummer vindt de lezer het eerste deel van de bijdrage. In één van de volgende nummers volgt het tweede deel.

Links

https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Mediaforum_2017_1.pdf

Art. 10 EVRM, EHRM, frontpage, hate speech, jurisprudentie, persvrijheid, Privacy, uitlatingen over rechtszaken, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Annotatie bij Rb. Oost-Brabant 20 juli 2016 (Stichting Privacy Claim / Precent) external link

van Daalen, O.

Mediaforum, vol. 2016, num: 8, pp: 239-240, 2017

Links

https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_Mf_2016_8.pdf

collectieve acties, Privacy, schadevergoedingen

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

The Weeping Angels are back, and they attack our privacy via smart TVs external link

Irion, K. & Helberger, N.

2017

Links

https://policyreview.info/articles/news/weeping-angels-are-back-and-they-attack-our-privacy-smart-tvs/451

CIA, Data protection, e-Privacy regulation, Freedom of expression, frontpage, Internet, Privacy, Smart TV

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Privacy, Freedom of Expression, and the Right to Be Forgotten in Europe external link

Kulk, S. & Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.

forthcoming in J. Polonetsky, O. Tene, E. Selinger (ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Privacy, 2017, 0302

Abstract

In this chapter we discuss the relation between privacy and freedom of expression in Europe. In principle, the two rights have equal weight in Europe – which right prevails depends on the circumstances of a case. We use the Google Spain judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, sometimes called the ‘right to be forgotten’ judgment, to illustrate the difficulties when balancing the two rights. The court decided in Google Spain that people have, under certain conditions, the right to have search results for their name delisted. We discuss how Google and Data Protection Authorities deal with such delisting requests in practice. Delisting requests illustrate that balancing privacy and freedom of expression interests will always remain difficult.

Links

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2923722

Criminal Conviction, Dutch Law, Freedom of expression, Freedom of Speech, frontpage, Personal data, Privacy, right to be forgotten, Search Engine, Sensitive Data, Special Categories of Data

RIS

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Kulk, S.
AU  - Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.
PY  - 0302
DA  - 2017-03-02
T1  - Privacy, Freedom of Expression, and the Right to Be Forgotten in Europe
UR  - https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2923722
AB  - In this chapter we discuss the relation between privacy and freedom of expression in Europe. In principle, the two rights have equal weight in Europe – which right prevails depends on the circumstances of a case. We use the Google Spain judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, sometimes called the ‘right to be forgotten’ judgment, to illustrate the difficulties when balancing the two rights. The court decided in Google Spain that people have, under certain conditions, the right to have search results for their name delisted. We discuss how Google and Data Protection Authorities deal with such delisting requests in practice. Delisting requests illustrate that balancing privacy and freedom of expression interests will always remain difficult.
K1  - Criminal Conviction
K1  - Dutch Law
K1  - Freedom of expression
K1  - Freedom of Speech
K1  - frontpage
K1  - Personal data
K1  - Privacy
K1  - right to be forgotten
K1  - Search Engine
K1  - Sensitive Data
K1  - Special Categories of Data
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Chapter{Kulk2017,
	title = {Privacy, Freedom of Expression, and the Right to Be Forgotten in Europe},
	author = {Kulk, S. and Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.},
	year = {0302},
	date = {2017-03-02},
	abstract = {In this chapter we discuss the relation between privacy and freedom of expression in Europe. In principle, the two rights have equal weight in Europe – which right prevails depends on the circumstances of a case. We use the Google Spain judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, sometimes called the ‘right to be forgotten’ judgment, to illustrate the difficulties when balancing the two rights. The court decided in Google Spain that people have, under certain conditions, the right to have search results for their name delisted. We discuss how Google and Data Protection Authorities deal with such delisting requests in practice. Delisting requests illustrate that balancing privacy and freedom of expression interests will always remain difficult.},
	keywords = {Criminal Conviction, Dutch Law, Freedom of expression, Freedom of Speech, frontpage, Personal data, Privacy, right to be forgotten, Search Engine, Sensitive Data, Special Categories of Data},
}

Save .bib

Smart TV and the online media sector: User privacy in view of changing market realities external link

Irion, K. & Helberger, N.

Telecommunications Policy, vol. 41, num: 3, pp: 170-184, 2017

Abstract

Smart TV and online media enable precise monitoring of online media consumption, which also forms the basis for personalised recommendations. This new practice challenges EU policy in two respects. Firstly, the legality of monitoring individual media consumption and using personal data of users is primarily addressed under data protection law. Secondly, tracking of viewing behaviour and personalisation of media content can also affect individuals’ freedom to receive information, as well as the realisation of media policy objectives such as media freedom and pluralism, implications that so far are not reflected in media law and policy, or only marginally. This article addresses the increasing reliance on personal data and personalised services in the audiovisual and online media sector and queries the appropriateness of the legal status quo in light of implementation and enforcement actions in Germany and the Netherlands. The analysis concludes with a call for media policy makers and regulators to pay more attention to the issue of ‘smart surveillance’ of media users, and develops a number of concrete recommendations on how to accommodate the specific privacy concerns of media users.

Links

frontpage, Fundamental rights, Media consumption, Media policy, Monitoring, Online media, Privacy, Smart TV

RIS

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Irion, K.
AU  - Helberger, N.
PY  - 0103
DA  - 2017-01-03
T1  - Smart TV and the online media sector: User privacy in view of changing market realities
JO  - Telecommunications Policy
VL  - 41
NV  - 3
SP  - 170-184
UR  - https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Smart-TV-and-the-Online-media-sector-prepub.pdf
DO  - https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2016.12.013
AB  - Smart TV and online media enable precise monitoring of online media consumption, which also forms the basis for personalised recommendations. This new practice challenges EU policy in two respects. Firstly, the legality of monitoring individual media consumption and using personal data of users is primarily addressed under data protection law. Secondly, tracking of viewing behaviour and personalisation of media content can also affect individuals’ freedom to receive information, as well as the realisation of media policy objectives such as media freedom and pluralism, implications that so far are not reflected in media law and policy, or only marginally. This article addresses the increasing reliance on personal data and personalised services in the audiovisual and online media sector and queries the appropriateness of the legal status quo in light of implementation and enforcement actions in Germany and the Netherlands. The analysis concludes with a call for media policy makers and regulators to pay more attention to the issue of ‘smart surveillance’ of media users, and develops a number of concrete recommendations on how to accommodate the specific privacy concerns of media users.
K1  - frontpage
K1  - Fundamental rights
K1  - Media consumption
K1  - Media policy
K1  - Monitoring
K1  - Online media
K1  - Privacy
K1  - Smart TV
ER  -

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Article{Irion2017,
	title = {Smart TV and the online media sector: User privacy in view of changing market realities},
	author = {Irion, K. and Helberger, N.},
	doi = {https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2016.12.013},
	year = {0103},
	date = {2017-01-03},
	journal = {Telecommunications Policy},
	volume = {41},
	number = {3},
	pages = {170-184},
	abstract = {Smart TV and online media enable precise monitoring of online media consumption, which also forms the basis for personalised recommendations. This new practice challenges EU policy in two respects. Firstly, the legality of monitoring individual media consumption and using personal data of users is primarily addressed under data protection law. Secondly, tracking of viewing behaviour and personalisation of media content can also affect individuals’ freedom to receive information, as well as the realisation of media policy objectives such as media freedom and pluralism, implications that so far are not reflected in media law and policy, or only marginally. This article addresses the increasing reliance on personal data and personalised services in the audiovisual and online media sector and queries the appropriateness of the legal status quo in light of implementation and enforcement actions in Germany and the Netherlands. The analysis concludes with a call for media policy makers and regulators to pay more attention to the issue of ‘smart surveillance’ of media users, and develops a number of concrete recommendations on how to accommodate the specific privacy concerns of media users.},
	keywords = {frontpage, Fundamental rights, Media consumption, Media policy, Monitoring, Online media, Privacy, Smart TV},
}

Save .bib