Digitale bibliotheekactiviteiten bekeken door auteursrechtelijke bril external link

Informatie Professional, num: 12, pp: 34, 2013

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Tussen beeld en werkelijkheid: het verschil tussen de traditionele kartografie en Google Street View external link

Geo-Info, num: 3, pp: 4-6, 2013

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Baywatch: two Approaches to Measure the Effects of Blocking Access to The Pirate Bay external link

Leenheer, J., Ham, J. van der, Dumitru, C. & Poort, J.
pp: 15, 2013

Abstract

In the fight against the unauthorised sharing of copyright protected material, aka piracy, Dutch Internet Service Providers have been summoned by courts to block their subscribers’ access to The Pirate Bay (TPB) and related sites. This paper studies the effectiveness of this approach towards online copyright enforcement, using both a consumer survey and a newly developed non-infringing technology for BitTorrent monitoring. While a small group of respondents download less from illegal sources or claim to have stopped, and a small but significant effect is found on the distribution of Dutch peers, no lasting net impact is found on the percentage of the Dutch population downloading from illegal sources.

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Quality, merit, aesthetics and purpose: An inquiry into EU copyright law’s eschewal of other criteria than originality external link

van Gompel, S. & Lavik, E.
RIDA, num: 236, pp: 100-295, 2013

Abstract

This article examines the rule that no other criteria than originality shall be applied to determine the eligibility for protection of works, as contained in a few EU Directives on copyright (i.e. the Computer Programs Directive, the Term Directive and the Database Directive). While aimed to preclude criteria such as quality, merit, aesthetics and purpose from the subject-matter definition of copyright, the legal significance and practical implications of this rule is not entirely clear. Analysing the legislative history of the ‘no other criteria’-clause in EU copyright law and its equivalent in the national laws of four EU Member States (i.e. France, Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom), the article observes that the objective of the rule is to prevent the grant or refusal of copyright by the courts from being dependent on subjective evaluative judgments about a work’s intrinsic value or worth. Judges are not supposed to assess whether a work aesthetically or commercially stands out, but only need to determine whether it meets the originality threshold. In practice, however, while the courts practically always refrain from using the lack of success, merit or quality as an argument to <i>withhold</i> copyright from a creation, they do not necessarily ignore a work’s success, merit or quality when <i> granting</i> protection to it. Moreover, the article finds that genres and categories of works are not always definable on formal properties alone and that judges sometimes cannot escape making qualitative or aesthetic considerations when determining the eligibility for protection of low original works. </span> <span lang="EN-GB">The article concludes that, since judges sometimes cannot make a clear distinction between protectable and non-protectable subject-matter on the basis of the originality criterion alone, copyright law’s concept of originality would fail to adequately serve its discriminatory function, should the ‘no other criteria’-clause always be taken literally.

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Beyond the Safe Harbours: Harmonising Substantive Intermediary Liability for Copyright Infringement in Europe external link

Intellectual Property Quarterly, num: 3, pp: 253-274, 2013

Abstract

With the adoption and subsequent national implementation of the E-Commerce Directive’s safe harbour regime, the architecture set up for intermediary liability in Europe has become two-tiered: at a first stage, it is necessary to examine whether a given intermediary attracts, in its pursuit of a certain activity, civil liability according to the standards in place in national legislation and only then, in the second instance, must the inapplicability of any immunity be established. As a result, although it provides a veneer of approximation by immunising intermediaries under certain circumscribed conditions, the Directive does not harmonise the underlying substantive liability norms which decide whether the safe harbours will be necessary or redundant. Instead, these are determined by national tort law, leaving ample room for national divergences between the regimes of the various Member States. This paper examines the applicable tort rules currently in place in three selected jurisdictions of the UK, France and Germany, picking out their commonalities and divergences and revealing the confusion that governs the topic across European borders. The intention is to examine the structures in place that could allow for the eventual European harmonisation of substantive intermediary liability beyond the safe harbours.

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Copyright and electronic document delivery services external link

Interlending & Document Supply, num: 3, pp: 8-14, 1999

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Chronicle of The Netherlands. Dutch copyright law 1990-1995 external link

RIDA, num: 169, pp: 128-195, 1999

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Adapting copyright to the information superhighway external link

pp: 81-102, 1999

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Copyright and multimedia. Licensing in the digital era external link

pp: 9, 1996

Abstract

In this article a number of the most relevant legal issues for the emerging multimedia industry will be identified. The main focus will be on the complicated licensing problems involved in producing and publishing multimedia programmes.

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Fierce Creatures. Copyright Exemptions: Towards Extinction? external link

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib