Final Report Perspectives Authors and Performers download

Poort, J. & Pervaiz, A.
2022

Abstract

This is the final report of work package 3 and focuses on Authors and Performers and their experience with digital and disruptive factors and how they impact them professionally and financially. The report is based on the results derived from a survey that targets artists from diverse creative fields within the European Union (EU). The first part of the report is the methodology section, where we discuss the research design. It discusses in detail the methods used in preparing the survey – from inception to execution. This is followed by an extensive data analysis section that provides descriptive results followed by analysis of the results both empirically and from interviews. The report then ends with a discussion section and conclusions.

Copyright

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

AI Music Outputs: Challenges to the Copyright Legal Framework – Part I external link

Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2022

Artificial intelligence, Copyright, frontpage, muziek

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

AI Music Outputs: Challenges to the Copyright Legal Framework download

2022

Abstract

This report examines the application of EU copyright and related rights law to outputs generated by or with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) systems, tools or techniques (AI outputs), with a focus on outputs in the musical domain. The Report examines the question: How can and should EU copyright and related rights law protect AI musical outputs? The interdisciplinary (legal and empirical) research involves: (i) analyzing of the protection of AI outputs under EU copyright and related rights law; (ii) examining the attribution of authorship and ownership to (natural and legal) persons involved in the creation or production of AI outputs; (iii) proposing interpretative guidelines and policy recommendations on increasing legal certainty regarding the protection, authorship, and ownership of copyright and related rights over AI outputs, especially music outputs.

Artificial intelligence, computer-generated works, Copyright, EU, Intellectual property, music, originality, related rights

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

The rise of NFTs: These aren’t the droids you’re looking for external link

European Intellectual Property Review, 2022

Abstract

Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are hailed as revolutionary tools that will empower artists and revolutionize copyright management and remuneration. This article explores their copyright relevance, and it describes how copyright might apply in relation to NFT creation and trading. In doing so, it provides an overview of the ecosystem of actors built around NFTs, and it analyzes the role of these actors according to the European copyright normative framework.

blockchain, Copyright, digital art, frontpage, non-fungible tokens

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

A Proposal to leverage Article 17 to build a public repository of Public Domain and openly licensed works external link

Reda, J. & Keller, P.
Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2021

Art. 17, Auteursrecht, Copyright, frontpage, public domain

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Public Sector Information Reuse and Copyright download

Copyright, public sector information

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

EU copyright law round up – second trimester of 2021 external link

Trapova, A. & Quintais, J.
2021

Art. 17 CDSM Directive, Article 17, Copyright, frontpage

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Commission’s Guidance on Art. 17 CDSM Directive: the authorisation dimension external link

Art. 17 CDSM Directive, Article 17, Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Copyright, frontpage

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

The Interplay between the Digital Services Act and Sector Regulation: How Special is Copyright? external link

Quintais, J. & Schwemer, S.
European Journal of Risk Regulation, vol. 13, iss. : 2, pp: 191-217, 2022

Abstract

On 15 December 2020, the European Commission published its proposal for a Regulation on a Single Market for Digital Services (Digital Services Act). It carries out a regulatory overhaul of the 21-year- old horizontal rules on intermediary liability in the Directive and introduces new due diligence obligations for intermediary services. Our analysis illuminates an important point that has so far received little attention: how would the Digital Services Act’s rules interact with existing sector-specific lex specialis rules? In this paper, we look specifically at the intersection of the Digital Services Act with the regime for online content sharing service providers (OCSSPs) set forth in art. 17 of Directive (EU) 2019/790 on copyright in the Digital Single Market (CDSM Directive). At first glance, these regimes do not appear to overlap as the rules on copyright are lex specialis to the Digital Services Act. A closer look shows a more complex and nuanced picture. Our analysis concludes that the DSA will apply to OCSSPs insofar as it contains rules that regulate matters not covered by art. 17 CDSM Directive, as well as specific rules on matters where art. 17 leaves margin of discretion to Member States. This includes, to varying degrees, rules in the DSA relating to the liability of intermediary providers and to due diligence obligations for online platforms of different sizes. Importantly, we consider that such rules apply even where art. 17 CDSM Directive contains specific (but less precise) regulation on the matter. From a normative perspective, this might be a desirable outcome, to the extent that the DSA aims to establish “uniform rules for a safe, predictable and trusted online environment, where fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter are effectively protected”. Based on our analysis, we suggest a number of clarifications that might be help achieve that goal.

Art. 17 CDSM Directive, Content moderation, Copyright, Digital Services Act (DSA), frontpage, Online platforms

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib