Not so silly after all – new hope for private copying
Abstract
The decision of the French court in Paris in the so-called Mulholland case has left a sour after-taste since. Could it be true that the privat copying exception, a long standing tradition in many national copyright laws, was in fact not much more than a toothless paper tiger? When we reported about this case we expressed our disbelief that this should have been the end of the private copying exception. And indeed, as the Court of Appeals has recently decided, the tiger may be made of paper, but it still has its teeth.
Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom
Bibtex
Article{nokey,
title = {Not so silly after all – new hope for private copying},
author = {Helberger, N.},
url = {http://www.indicare.org/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=132},
year = {1013},
date = {2005-10-13},
journal = {INDICARE Monitor},
abstract = {The decision of the French court in Paris in the so-called Mulholland case has left a sour after-taste since. Could it be true that the privat copying exception, a long standing tradition in many national copyright laws, was in fact not much more than a toothless paper tiger? When we reported about this case we expressed our disbelief that this should have been the end of the private copying exception. And indeed, as the Court of Appeals has recently decided, the tiger may be made of paper, but it still has its teeth.},
keywords = {Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom},
}