Keyword: WIPO

Joint Comment to WIPO on Copyright and Artificial Intelligence external link

Flynn, S., Carroll, M., Sag, M., Guibault, L., Margoni, T., Butler, B., Rocha de Souza, A., Bogataj Jancic, M., Jaszi, P., Quintais, J., Geiger, C., Ncube, C., White, B., Scaria, A.G., Botero, C. & Craig, C.
2020

Abstract

On December 13, 2019, WIPO invited member states and all other interested parties to provide comments and suggestions to help define the issues related to intellectual property (IP) and artificial intelligence (AI) based on a Draft Issues Paper on IP Policy and AI. These comments will be used to prepare a revised issues paper for discussion at the second session of the WIPO Conversation on IP and AI. This Joint Comment is made in response to WIPO’s Public Consultation on AI and IP Policy and is endorsed by 16 members of the Global Expert Network on Copyright User Rights.

Artificial intelligence, Auteursrecht, frontpage, WIPO

Bibtex

Article{Flynn2020, title = {Joint Comment to WIPO on Copyright and Artificial Intelligence}, author = {Flynn, S. and Carroll, M. and Sag, M. and Guibault, L. and Margoni, T. and Butler, B. and Rocha de Souza, A. and Bogataj Jancic, M. and Jaszi, P. and Quintais, J. and Geiger, C. and Ncube, C. and White, B. and Scaria, A.G. and Botero, C. and Craig, C.}, url = {http://infojustice.org/archives/42009}, year = {0225}, date = {2020-02-25}, abstract = {On December 13, 2019, WIPO invited member states and all other interested parties to provide comments and suggestions to help define the issues related to intellectual property (IP) and artificial intelligence (AI) based on a Draft Issues Paper on IP Policy and AI. These comments will be used to prepare a revised issues paper for discussion at the second session of the WIPO Conversation on IP and AI. This Joint Comment is made in response to WIPO’s Public Consultation on AI and IP Policy and is endorsed by 16 members of the Global Expert Network on Copyright User Rights.}, keywords = {Artificial intelligence, Auteursrecht, frontpage, WIPO}, }

The WIPO Broadcasting Treaty. A Conceptual Conundrum external link

Hugenholtz, P.
European Intellectual Property Review, vol. 2019, num: 4, pp: 199-202, 2019

Abstract

The Broadcasting Treaty that has been discussed at WIPO for over twenty years, seems to be reaching a dead end. The Treaty that aims at extending the legal protection of broadcasters to the digital realm, suffers from three serious flaws: one economic, one conceptual and one pragmatic. Due to the decreasing technical costs of broadcasting, the economic case for granting special rights to broadcasters is weakening. Moreover, properly defining the act of ‘broadcasting’ that would give rise to legal protection, is highly problematic. Finally, no real and urgent need for a new right seems to exist, in light of current legal regimes that broadcasters already rely on under national law. Perhaps the time has come to abandon work on the WIPO Broadcasting Treaty, and move on.

Auteursrecht, frontpage, WIPO, WIPO broadcasting treaty

Bibtex

Article{Hugenholtz2019c, title = {The WIPO Broadcasting Treaty. A Conceptual Conundrum}, author = {Hugenholtz, P.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/EIPR_2019_4.pdf}, year = {0404}, date = {2019-04-04}, journal = {European Intellectual Property Review}, volume = {2019}, number = {4}, pages = {199-202}, abstract = {The Broadcasting Treaty that has been discussed at WIPO for over twenty years, seems to be reaching a dead end. The Treaty that aims at extending the legal protection of broadcasters to the digital realm, suffers from three serious flaws: one economic, one conceptual and one pragmatic. Due to the decreasing technical costs of broadcasting, the economic case for granting special rights to broadcasters is weakening. Moreover, properly defining the act of ‘broadcasting’ that would give rise to legal protection, is highly problematic. Finally, no real and urgent need for a new right seems to exist, in light of current legal regimes that broadcasters already rely on under national law. Perhaps the time has come to abandon work on the WIPO Broadcasting Treaty, and move on.}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, frontpage, WIPO, WIPO broadcasting treaty}, }

The WIPO Broadcasting Treaty. A Conceptual Conundrum external link

Hugenholtz, P.
2018

Abstract

Keynote at KEI Seminar, Appraising the WIPO Broadcast Treaty and its Implications on Access to Culture, Geneva 3-4 October 2018

Auteursrecht, broadcasting treaty, frontpage, Naburige rechten, omroepen, WIPO

Bibtex

Other{Hugenholtz2018g, title = {The WIPO Broadcasting Treaty. A Conceptual Conundrum}, author = {Hugenholtz, P.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Keynote_WIPO_Broadcasting_Treaty_2018.pdf}, year = {1024}, date = {2018-10-24}, abstract = {Keynote at KEI Seminar, Appraising the WIPO Broadcast Treaty and its Implications on Access to Culture, Geneva 3-4 October 2018}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, broadcasting treaty, frontpage, Naburige rechten, omroepen, WIPO}, }

Protecting traditional cultural expressions – copyright tensions and human rights opportunities? external link

Breemen, J.
Critical Indigenous Rights Studies, Routledge, 0928, pp: 108-133, ISBN: 9781138729339

Abstract

The protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs) is not a straightforward issue. At first sight, characteristics of TCEs and their protection suggest similarity to copyright works. However, TCE protection should not be viewed as simply an (isolated) intellectual property issue. Rather, the protection of TCEs is part of a broader (political) context and struggle for rights. The chapter focuses on showing the complexity of the interrelation between copyright and indigenous peoples’ rights. It argues that a cultural and indigenous rights perspective could help address tensions deriving from differing worldviews, the application of dominant, existing legal frameworks and diverging understandings of protecting creativity and works of culture.

Copyright, crossing legal boundaries, cultural rights, frontpage, indigenous rights, Intellectual property, protection issues, TCEs, traditional cultural expressions, UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, WIPO

Bibtex

Chapter{Breemen2018f, title = {Protecting traditional cultural expressions – copyright tensions and human rights opportunities?}, author = {Breemen, J.}, url = {https://www.routledge.com/Critical-Indigenous-Rights-Studies/Corradi-de-Feyter-Desmet-Vanhees/p/book/9781138729339}, year = {0928}, date = {2018-09-28}, abstract = {The protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs) is not a straightforward issue. At first sight, characteristics of TCEs and their protection suggest similarity to copyright works. However, TCE protection should not be viewed as simply an (isolated) intellectual property issue. Rather, the protection of TCEs is part of a broader (political) context and struggle for rights. The chapter focuses on showing the complexity of the interrelation between copyright and indigenous peoples’ rights. It argues that a cultural and indigenous rights perspective could help address tensions deriving from differing worldviews, the application of dominant, existing legal frameworks and diverging understandings of protecting creativity and works of culture.}, keywords = {Copyright, crossing legal boundaries, cultural rights, frontpage, indigenous rights, Intellectual property, protection issues, TCEs, traditional cultural expressions, UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, WIPO}, }

International Survey on Private Copying WIPO – Thuiskopie external link

Poort, J.
2016

Abstract

Presentation "International Survey on Private Copying WIPO – Thuiskopie" at International Conference on Private Copying, Hermitage Amsterdam 23 June 2016

Intellectuele eigendom, levies, private copy, private copying, thuiskopie, WIPO

Bibtex

Presentation{Poort2016, title = {International Survey on Private Copying WIPO – Thuiskopie}, author = {Poort, J.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/20160623-International-Conference-on-Private-Copying-Joost-Poort-3.pdf}, year = {0623}, date = {2016-06-23}, abstract = {Presentation "International Survey on Private Copying WIPO – Thuiskopie" at International Conference on Private Copying, Hermitage Amsterdam 23 June 2016}, keywords = {Intellectuele eigendom, levies, private copy, private copying, thuiskopie, WIPO}, }