Keyword: Licensing

Europeana Sounds and Copyrights: The Need for and Challenges in Licensing Archival Material external link

Schroff, S.
2015

collective management, Copyright, Europeana, Licensing

Bibtex

Report{Schroff2015, title = {Europeana Sounds and Copyrights: The Need for and Challenges in Licensing Archival Material}, author = {Schroff, S.}, url = {http://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Projects/Project_list/Europeana_Sounds/Other%20documents%20related%20to%20the%20project/Europeana%20Report%20by%20IVIR%20final.pdf}, year = {1223}, date = {2015-12-23}, keywords = {collective management, Copyright, Europeana, Licensing}, }

Regulating CMOs by competition: an incomplete answer to the licensing problem? external link

Hviid, M., Schroff, S. & Street, J.
CREATe Working Paper Series, vol. 2016/03, pp: 1- 31, 2016

Abstract

While the three functions of Collective Management Organisations – to licence use, monitor use, and to collect and distribute the revenue – have traditionally been accepted as leading to a natural (national) monopoly, digital exploitation of music may no longer support such a conclusion. The European Commission has challenged the traditional structures through reforms that increase the degree of competition. This paper asks whether the reforms have had the desired effect and shows, through qualitative research, that at least as regards the streaming of music, competition has not delivered. Part of the reason for this may be that the services required by the now competing CMOs have changed.

collective management, competition, Licensing

Bibtex

Article{Hviid2016, title = {Regulating CMOs by competition: an incomplete answer to the licensing problem?}, author = {Hviid, M. and Schroff, S. and Street, J.}, url = {http://www.create.ac.uk/publications/regulating-cmos-by-competition-an-incomplete-answer-to-the-licensing-problem/}, year = {0301}, date = {2016-03-01}, journal = {CREATe Working Paper Series}, volume = {2016/03}, pages = {1- 31}, abstract = {While the three functions of Collective Management Organisations – to licence use, monitor use, and to collect and distribute the revenue – have traditionally been accepted as leading to a natural (national) monopoly, digital exploitation of music may no longer support such a conclusion. The European Commission has challenged the traditional structures through reforms that increase the degree of competition. This paper asks whether the reforms have had the desired effect and shows, through qualitative research, that at least as regards the streaming of music, competition has not delivered. Part of the reason for this may be that the services required by the now competing CMOs have changed.}, keywords = {collective management, competition, Licensing}, }