Intellectual property
| Giannopoulou, A.
The New Copyright Directive: Article 14 or when the Public Domain Enters the New Copyright Directive Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2019. @article{Giannopoulou2019b,
title = {The New Copyright Directive: Article 14 or when the Public Domain Enters the New Copyright Directive }, author = {Giannopoulou, A.}, url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2019/06/27/the-new-copyright-directive-article-14-or-when-the-public-domain-enters-the-new-copyright-directive/}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-06-28}, journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| van Gompel, S.
C. op den Kamp & D. Hunter, (Ed.): A History of Intellectual Property in 50 Objects, 2019 , Chapter 12, pp. 104-111, Cambridge University Press, 2019, ISBN: 9781108325806. @inbook{vanGompel2019e,
title = {Light Bulb}, author = {van Gompel, S.}, editor = {C. op den Kamp & D. Hunter, }, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Light_Bulb.pdf}, doi = {10.1017/9781108325806}, isbn = {9781108325806}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-06-26}, urldate = {2019-06-26}, booktitle = {A History of Intellectual Property in 50 Objects}, volume = {2019}, pages = {104-111}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, chapter = {12}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {inbook} } |
| Bodó, B., Handke, C.W., Quintais, J., Vallbé, J.
Knocking on Heaven’s Door: User preferences on digital cultural distribution Internet Policy Review, 8 (2), 2019. @article{Vallb\'{e}2019,
title = {Knocking on Heaven’s Door: User preferences on digital cultural distribution}, author = {Vallb\'{e}, J. and Bod\'{o}, B. and Quintais, J. and Handke, C.W.}, url = {https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/knocking-heavens-door-user-preferences-digital-cultural-distribution}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-06-20}, journal = {Internet Policy Review}, volume = {8}, number = {2}, abstract = {This paper explores the social, demographic and attitudinal basis of consumer support of a Copyright Compensation System (CCS), which, for a small monthly fee would legalise currently infringing online social practices such as private copying from illegal sources and online sharing of copyrighted works. We do this by first identifying how different online and offline, legal and illegal, free and paying content acquisition channels are used in the media market using a cluster-based classification of respondents. Second, we assess the effect of cultural consumption on the support for a shift from the status quo towards alternative, CCS-based forms of digital cultural content distribution. Finally, we link these two analyses to identify the factors that drive the dynamics of change in digital cultural consumption habits. Our study shows significant support to a CCS compared to the status quo by both occasional and frequent buyers of cultural goods, despite the widespread adoption of legal free and paying online services by consumers. The nature of these preferences are also explored with the inclusion of consumer preference intensities regarding certain CCS attributes. Our results have relevant policy implications, for they outline CCS as a reform option. In particular, they point evidence-based copyright reform away from its current direction in the EU of stronger enforcement measures, additional exclusive rights, and increased liability and duties of care for online platforms. This work shows that CCS may be an apt policy tool to hinder piracy and potentially increase right holder revenues, while respecting fundamental rights and promoting technological development.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This paper explores the social, demographic and attitudinal basis of consumer support of a Copyright Compensation System (CCS), which, for a small monthly fee would legalise currently infringing online social practices such as private copying from illegal sources and online sharing of copyrighted works. We do this by first identifying how different online and offline, legal and illegal, free and paying content acquisition channels are used in the media market using a cluster-based classification of respondents. Second, we assess the effect of cultural consumption on the support for a shift from the status quo towards alternative, CCS-based forms of digital cultural content distribution. Finally, we link these two analyses to identify the factors that drive the dynamics of change in digital cultural consumption habits. Our study shows significant support to a CCS compared to the status quo by both occasional and frequent buyers of cultural goods, despite the widespread adoption of legal free and paying online services by consumers. The nature of these preferences are also explored with the inclusion of consumer preference intensities regarding certain CCS attributes. Our results have relevant policy implications, for they outline CCS as a reform option. In particular, they point evidence-based copyright reform away from its current direction in the EU of stronger enforcement measures, additional exclusive rights, and increased liability and duties of care for online platforms. This work shows that CCS may be an apt policy tool to hinder piracy and potentially increase right holder revenues, while respecting fundamental rights and promoting technological development.
|
| Quintais, J.
Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2019. @article{Quintais2019d,
title = {The New Copyright Directive: A tour d’horizon \textendash Part II (of press publishers, upload filters and the real value gap)}, author = {Quintais, J.}, url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2019/06/17/the-new-copyright-directive-a-tour-dhorizon-part-ii-of-press-publishers-upload-filters-and-the-real-value-gap/}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-06-18}, journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Quintais, J.
The New Copyright Directive: A tour d’horizon – Part I Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2019. @article{Quintais2019c,
title = {The New Copyright Directive: A tour d’horizon \textendash Part I}, author = {Quintais, J.}, url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2019/06/07/the-new-copyright-directive-a-tour-dhorizon-part-i/}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-06-07}, journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Hugenholtz, P.
Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 6 oktober 2017 (Imation / Thuiskopie en Staat) Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, 2019 (21/22), pp. 3068-3070, 2019. @article{Hugenholtz2019d,
title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 6 oktober 2017 (Imation / Thuiskopie en Staat)}, author = {Hugenholtz, P.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2019_182.pdf}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-06-04}, journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie}, volume = {2019}, number = {21/22}, pages = {3068-3070}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Kabel, J.
Annotatie bij Hof Amsterdam 27 november 2018 (Nomenta / Nikki) AMI, 2019 (2), pp. 72, 2019. @article{Kabel2019,
title = {Annotatie bij Hof Amsterdam 27 november 2018 (Nomenta / Nikki)}, author = {Kabel, J.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_AMI_2019_2.pdf}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-05-24}, journal = {AMI}, volume = {2019}, number = {2}, pages = {72}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| van Eechoud, M.
Annotatie bij Rb. Den Haag 12 december 2018 (FPI Ghana / Koas c.s.) AMI, 2019 (2), pp. 73-74, 2019. @article{vanEechoud2019e,
title = {Annotatie bij Rb. Den Haag 12 december 2018 (FPI Ghana / Koas c.s.)}, author = {van Eechoud, M.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_AMI_2019_2_p73.pdf}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-05-24}, journal = {AMI}, volume = {2019}, number = {2}, pages = {73-74}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Jütte, B., Quintais, J.
Advocate General Turns down the Music - Sampling Is Not a Fundamental Right under EU Copyright Law European Intellectual Property Review (forthcoming), 2019. @article{J\"{u}tte2019,
title = { Advocate General Turns down the Music - Sampling Is Not a Fundamental Right under EU Copyright Law}, author = {J\"{u}tte, B. and Quintais, J.}, url = {https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3377205}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-05-09}, journal = {European Intellectual Property Review (forthcoming)}, abstract = {In his Opinion in Pelham (C-467/17) Advocate General Szpunar suggests that the use of samples from sound recordings is not permitted under the European copyright rules. While applying an extensive interpretation of the scope of the rights of phonogram producers, he rejects an extensive interpretation of the quotation exception and limits the role of fundamental rights as external checks to copyright law. Despite its merits, there are key aspects of the Opinion that raise concerns: a too broad interpretation of the reproduction right; and an unduly strict view of copyright exceptions \textendash especially quotation \textendash and the role of fundamental rights in shaping the scope of copyright protection. On those points, we suggest that the Court does not follow the Opinion.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } In his Opinion in Pelham (C-467/17) Advocate General Szpunar suggests that the use of samples from sound recordings is not permitted under the European copyright rules. While applying an extensive interpretation of the scope of the rights of phonogram producers, he rejects an extensive interpretation of the quotation exception and limits the role of fundamental rights as external checks to copyright law. Despite its merits, there are key aspects of the Opinion that raise concerns: a too broad interpretation of the reproduction right; and an unduly strict view of copyright exceptions – especially quotation – and the role of fundamental rights in shaping the scope of copyright protection. On those points, we suggest that the Court does not follow the Opinion.
|
| Mil, J. van
German Federal Court of Justice asks CJEU if YouTube is directly liable for user-uploaded content Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice , 14 (5), pp. 355-356, 2019. @article{Mil2019b,
title = {German Federal Court of Justice asks CJEU if YouTube is directly liable for user-uploaded content}, author = {Mil, J. van}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpz034}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-05-07}, journal = {Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice }, volume = {14}, number = {5}, pages = {355-356}, abstract = {On 13 September 2018, the German Federal Court of Justice referred preliminary questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union, including the question whether YouTube performs acts of communication to the public when its users upload unauthorized content onto this platform.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } On 13 September 2018, the German Federal Court of Justice referred preliminary questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union, including the question whether YouTube performs acts of communication to the public when its users upload unauthorized content onto this platform.
|
| van Eechoud, M.
Schriftelijke inbreng Rondetafelgesprek wijziging Handelsregisterwet 2019, (Vaste Commissie voor Economische Zaken en Klimaat, Tweede Kamer). @techreport{vanEechoud2019d,
title = {Schriftelijke inbreng Rondetafelgesprek wijziging Handelsregisterwet}, author = {van Eechoud, M.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/paper_t.b.v._hoorzitting_rondetafelgesprek_Handelsregisterwet_d.d._11_april_2019.pdf}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-04-12}, note = {Vaste Commissie voor Economische Zaken en Klimaat, Tweede Kamer}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| Hugenholtz, P.
The WIPO Broadcasting Treaty. A Conceptual Conundrum European Intellectual Property Review, 2019 (4), pp. 199-202, 2019, (This opinion is based on a keynote speech delivered at the KEI Seminar, "Appraising the WIPO Broadcast treaty and its Implications on Access to Culture", Geneva, 3-4 October 2018.). @article{Hugenholtz2019c,
title = {The WIPO Broadcasting Treaty. A Conceptual Conundrum}, author = {Hugenholtz, P.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/EIPR_2019_4.pdf}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-04-04}, journal = {European Intellectual Property Review}, volume = {2019}, number = {4}, pages = {199-202}, abstract = {The Broadcasting Treaty that has been discussed at WIPO for over twenty years, seems to be reaching a dead end. The Treaty that aims at extending the legal protection of broadcasters to the digital realm, suffers from three serious flaws: one economic, one conceptual and one pragmatic. Due to the decreasing technical costs of broadcasting, the economic case for granting special rights to broadcasters is weakening. Moreover, properly defining the act of ‘broadcasting’ that would give rise to legal protection, is highly problematic. Finally, no real and urgent need for a new right seems to exist, in light of current legal regimes that broadcasters already rely on under national law. Perhaps the time has come to abandon work on the WIPO Broadcasting Treaty, and move on.}, note = {This opinion is based on a keynote speech delivered at the KEI Seminar, "Appraising the WIPO Broadcast treaty and its Implications on Access to Culture", Geneva, 3-4 October 2018.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } The Broadcasting Treaty that has been discussed at WIPO for over twenty years, seems to be reaching a dead end. The Treaty that aims at extending the legal protection of broadcasters to the digital realm, suffers from three serious flaws: one economic, one conceptual and one pragmatic. Due to the decreasing technical costs of broadcasting, the economic case for granting special rights to broadcasters is weakening. Moreover, properly defining the act of ‘broadcasting’ that would give rise to legal protection, is highly problematic. Finally, no real and urgent need for a new right seems to exist, in light of current legal regimes that broadcasters already rely on under national law. Perhaps the time has come to abandon work on the WIPO Broadcasting Treaty, and move on.
|
| Bodó, B.
Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2019 , 2019. @article{Bod\'{o}2019c,
title = {The science of piracy, the piracy of science. Who are the science pirates and where do they come from: Part 2}, author = {Bod\'{o}, B.}, url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2019/03/21/the-science-of-piracy-the-piracy-of-science-who-are-the-science-pirates-and-where-do-they-come-from-part-2/}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-03-21}, journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog}, volume = {2019}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Coche, E.
Heks'nkaas or the "Fifty Shades of Taste" Explained by the CJEU through EU Copyright Law European Intellectual Property Review, 2019 (3), pp. 173-180, 2019. @article{Coche2019b,
title = {Heks'nkaas or the "Fifty Shades of Taste" Explained by the CJEU through EU Copyright Law}, author = {Coche, E.}, url = {http://uba-sfx.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/uva-linker?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978977740233&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off;}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-03-12}, journal = {European Intellectual Property Review}, volume = {2019}, number = {3}, pages = {173-180}, abstract = {If the CJEU were to grant a prize to the 2018 most "original" copyright dispute, Levola Hengola v Smilde Foods (C-310/17) (the Heks’nkaas case) would undoubtedly stand among the nominees. The main reason why this case hit the spotlight is most probably because it touched upon the fundamentals of EU copyright law, namely its protectable subject-matter. Intriguingly, the complexities of copyright were unveiled by the following question: "Does Union law preclude the taste of food\textemdashas the author’s own intellectual creation\textemdashfrom being protected by copyright?" Notwithstanding the court’s dissenting answer, which clarified the scope of EU copyright law, it is of paramount importance to also discuss and unravel the ruling’s preceding procedure, including the Opinion by the Advocate General, as it shed light on the many existing controversies within copyright law.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } If the CJEU were to grant a prize to the 2018 most "original" copyright dispute, Levola Hengola v Smilde Foods (C-310/17) (the Heks’nkaas case) would undoubtedly stand among the nominees. The main reason why this case hit the spotlight is most probably because it touched upon the fundamentals of EU copyright law, namely its protectable subject-matter. Intriguingly, the complexities of copyright were unveiled by the following question: "Does Union law preclude the taste of food—as the author’s own intellectual creation—from being protected by copyright?" Notwithstanding the court’s dissenting answer, which clarified the scope of EU copyright law, it is of paramount importance to also discuss and unravel the ruling’s preceding procedure, including the Opinion by the Advocate General, as it shed light on the many existing controversies within copyright law.
|
| Bodó, B.
Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2019 , 2019. @article{Bod\'{o}2019b,
title = {The science of piracy, the piracy of science. Who are the science pirates and where do they come from: Part 1}, author = {Bod\'{o}, B.}, url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2019/03/06/the-science-of-piracy-the-piracy-of-science-who-are-the-science-pirates-and-where-do-they-come-from-part-1/}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-03-07}, journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog}, volume = {2019}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Delinavelli, G.
The EU Counterfeit & Piracy Watch List: political aims and legal challenges Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2019 , 2019. @article{Delinavelli2019,
title = {The EU Counterfeit & Piracy Watch List: political aims and legal challenges}, author = {Delinavelli, G.}, url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2019/03/05/the-eu-counterfeit-piracy-watch-list-political-aims-and-legal-challenges/}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-03-07}, journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog}, volume = {2019}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| van Gompel, S.
Smaak, auteursrecht en objectafbakening: over perceptie en bepaalbaarheid AMI, 2019 (1), pp. 9-16, 2019. @article{vanGompel2019d,
title = {Smaak, auteursrecht en objectafbakening: over perceptie en bepaalbaarheid}, author = {van Gompel, S.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AMI_2019_1.pdf}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-02-21}, journal = {AMI}, volume = {2019}, number = {1}, pages = {9-16}, abstract = {Het hoge woord is eruit: op smaak rust geen auteursrecht. Dit volgt direct uit het Levola/Smilde-arrest, waarin het Hof van Justitie van de Europese Unie (HvJ EU) vaststelt dat de Auteursrechtrichtlijn (Richtlijn 2001/29) ‘eraan in de weg staat dat de smaak van een voedingsmiddel op grond van deze richtlijn auteursrechtelijk wordt beschermd en dat een nationale wettelijke regeling in die zin wordt uitgelegd dat zij auteursrechtelijke bescherming verleent aan een dergelijke smaak’. De reden om smaak van auteursrechtelijk bescherming uit te sluiten is dat smaak onvoldoende nauwkeurig en objectief bepaalbaar is om object van bescherming te zijn. Als verklaring wijst het HvJ EU op de subjectiviteit en variabiliteit van de smaakperceptie en het ontbreken van technische middelen voor smaakbepaling. Zoals in deze bijdrage wordt uiteengezet, is deze argumentatie niet overtuigend en zelfs ondeugdelijk. Het bepaalbaarheidsvereiste is evenwel plausibel en navolgenswaardig, omdat het beoogt om meer rechtszekerheid te cre\"{e}ren over het object van auteursrechtelijke bescherming.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Het hoge woord is eruit: op smaak rust geen auteursrecht. Dit volgt direct uit het
Levola/Smilde-arrest, waarin het Hof van Justitie van de Europese Unie (HvJ EU) vaststelt dat de Auteursrechtrichtlijn (Richtlijn 2001/29) ‘eraan in de weg staat dat de smaak van een voedingsmiddel op grond van deze richtlijn auteursrechtelijk wordt beschermd en dat een nationale wettelijke regeling in die zin wordt uitgelegd dat zij auteursrechtelijke bescherming verleent aan een dergelijke smaak’. De reden om smaak van auteursrechtelijk bescherming uit te sluiten is dat smaak onvoldoende nauwkeurig en objectief bepaalbaar is om object van bescherming te zijn. Als verklaring wijst het HvJ EU op de subjectiviteit en variabiliteit van de smaakperceptie en het ontbreken van technische middelen voor smaakbepaling. Zoals in deze bijdrage wordt uiteengezet, is deze argumentatie niet overtuigend en zelfs ondeugdelijk. Het bepaalbaarheidsvereiste is evenwel plausibel en navolgenswaardig, omdat het beoogt om meer rechtszekerheid te creëren over het object van auteursrechtelijke bescherming. |
| Hugenholtz, P.
Openbaarheid van tarieven en licentievoorwaarden van cbo’s AMI, 2019 (1), pp. 1-8, 2019. @article{Hugenholtz2019b,
title = {Openbaarheid van tarieven en licentievoorwaarden van cbo’s}, author = {Hugenholtz, P.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AMI_2019_1_PBH.pdf}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-02-21}, journal = {AMI}, volume = {2019}, number = {1}, pages = {1-8}, abstract = {Op grond van de Wet toezicht zijn collectieve beheersorganisaties verplicht ‘standaardlicentieovereenkomsten en normaal toepasselijke tarieven’ actief openbaar te maken. Over de betekenis en reikwijdte van deze verplichting bestaat in Nederland onduidelijkheid en zelfs onenigheid, maar (nog) geen jurisprudentie. In dit artikel wordt gepoogd om, mede aan de hand van een analyse van de rechtsgronden van deze verplichting, te komen tot een juiste en in de praktijk hanteerbare interpretatie van de openbaarheidsplicht.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Op grond van de Wet toezicht zijn collectieve beheersorganisaties verplicht
‘standaardlicentieovereenkomsten en normaal toepasselijke tarieven’ actief openbaar te maken. Over de betekenis en reikwijdte van deze verplichting bestaat in Nederland onduidelijkheid en zelfs onenigheid, maar (nog) geen jurisprudentie. In dit artikel wordt gepoogd om, mede aan de hand van een analyse van de rechtsgronden van deze verplichting, te komen tot een juiste en in de praktijk hanteerbare interpretatie van de openbaarheidsplicht. |
| van Eechoud, M.
Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 8 juni 2018 (Pearson) AMI, 2019 (1), pp. 34-39, 2019. @article{vanEechoud2019,
title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 8 juni 2018 (Pearson)}, author = {van Eechoud, M.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_AMI_2019_1.pdf}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-02-21}, journal = {AMI}, volume = {2019}, number = {1}, pages = {34-39}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| van Eechoud, M.
Annotatie bij Rb. Den Haag 19 november 2018 (TVS / Revo) AMI, 2019 (1), pp. 40-41, 2019. @article{vanEechoud2019b,
title = {Annotatie bij Rb. Den Haag 19 november 2018 (TVS / Revo)}, author = {van Eechoud, M.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_AMI_2019_1_p40.pdf}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-02-21}, journal = {AMI}, volume = {2019}, number = {1}, pages = {40-41}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Thije, P. ten
Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2019 , 2019. @article{Thije2019b,
title = {Bastei L\"{u}bbe: “Fundamental Rights as a defence to circumvent enforcement of Copyright protection? No!”, says CJEU.}, author = {Thije, P. ten}, url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2019/02/11/bastei-lubbe-fundamental-rights-as-a-defence-to-circumvent-enforcement-of-copyright-protection-no-says-cjeu/}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-02-12}, journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog}, volume = {2019}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Schroff, S.
An alternative universe? Authors as copyright owners- the case of the Japanese Manga Industry Creative Industries Journal, 2019 , 2019. @article{Schroff2019,
title = {An alternative universe? Authors as copyright owners- the case of the Japanese Manga Industry}, author = {Schroff, S.}, url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17510694.2018.1563420}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-01-31}, journal = {Creative Industries Journal}, volume = {2019}, abstract = {Comics today are a major business and they form the source material for a whole range of sectors in the creative industries. In an environment where major investments are necessary to turn a comic into a cross-media success, commercial intermediaries such as Disney have become the key copyright holders. By controlling the copyright, they ensure full control over all aspects of its monetisation. However, this is not the only way success can be achieved on a commercial scale. In Japan, the creators of comics (Mangaka) keep their copyright- a direct contradiction to current copyright thinking. This paper addresses this conundrum by examining both the Manga business and copyright law to identify if the reasons why copyright is not centralised in the hands of the commercial intermediary, especially the publishers. The analysis will show that while there are differences between Japan and the EU/US, but these do not affect the role of copyright law and indeed failing to acquire the rights is a choice, not a necessity. Instead, this article will highlight that the competitive Manga market in combination with the uniquely Japanese publication right and social control best explain why Mangas are successful and Mangaka keep their rights.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Comics today are a major business and they form the source material for a whole range of sectors in the creative industries. In an environment where major investments are necessary to turn a comic into a cross-media success, commercial intermediaries such as Disney have become the key copyright holders. By controlling the copyright, they ensure full control over all aspects of its monetisation. However, this is not the only way success can be achieved on a commercial scale. In Japan, the creators of comics (Mangaka) keep their copyright- a direct contradiction to current copyright thinking. This paper addresses this conundrum by examining both the Manga business and copyright law to identify if the reasons why copyright is not centralised in the hands of the commercial intermediary, especially the publishers. The analysis will show that while there are differences between Japan and the EU/US, but these do not affect the role of copyright law and indeed failing to acquire the rights is a choice, not a necessity. Instead, this article will highlight that the competitive Manga market in combination with the uniquely Japanese publication right and social control best explain why Mangas are successful and Mangaka keep their rights.
|
| Mil, J. van
German BGH – Does YouTube Perform Acts of Communication to the Public? Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2018 , 2019. @article{Mil2019,
title = {German BGH \textendash Does YouTube Perform Acts of Communication to the Public?}, author = {Mil, J. van}, url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2019/01/27/german-bgh-does-youtube-perform-acts-of-communication-to-the-public/}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-01-29}, journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog}, volume = {2018}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| van Gompel, S.
Annotatie bij Rb. Amsterdam 27 augustus 2018 (Rutten / RF Mediaproducties) AMI, 2018 (6), pp. 257, 2019. @article{vanGompel2019b,
title = {Annotatie bij Rb. Amsterdam 27 augustus 2018 (Rutten / RF Mediaproducties)}, author = {van Gompel, S.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_AMI_2018_6_257.pdf}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-01-18}, journal = {AMI}, volume = {2018}, number = {6}, pages = {257}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| van Gompel, S.
Annotatie bij Rb. Overijssel 12 juni 2018 (Eiser / Rijksuniversiteit Groningen) AMI, 2018 (6), pp. 259-260, 2019. @article{vanGompel2019c,
title = {Annotatie bij Rb. Overijssel 12 juni 2018 (Eiser / Rijksuniversiteit Groningen)}, author = {van Gompel, S.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_AMI_2018_6_259.pdf}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-01-18}, journal = {AMI}, volume = {2018}, number = {6}, pages = {259-260}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Bodó, B., Handke, Christian W., Quintais, J.
Truce in the Copyright War? The Pros and Cons of Copyright Compensation Systems for Digital Use Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 15 (2), pp. 23-56, 2019. @article{HandkeBodoQuintais2018,
title = {Truce in the Copyright War? The Pros and Cons of Copyright Compensation Systems for Digital Use }, author = {Handke, Christian W. and Quintais, J. and Bod\'{o}, B. }, url = {https://ssrn.com/abstract=3311019 }, year = {2019}, date = {2019-01-16}, journal = {Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues}, volume = {15}, number = {2}, pages = {23-56}, abstract = {This paper discusses copyright compensation systems (CCS) -- that provide licenses for downloading and non-commercial use of copyright works in return for a fee -- in the light of welfare economics and transaction cost economics. Recent empirical studies suggest that CCS could improve social welfare at least for recorded music. The general theme of the theoretical discussion in this paper is a simplicity-flexibility trade-off. On the one hand, CCS seek to reduce the costs of administering and trading copyrights online. On the other hand, standard copyright licenses distort the market mechanism. This paper discusses the costs and benefits of various CCS proposals compared to alternative ways of managing copyright online. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This paper discusses copyright compensation systems (CCS) -- that provide licenses for downloading and non-commercial use of copyright works in return for a fee -- in the light of welfare economics and transaction cost economics. Recent empirical studies suggest that CCS could improve social welfare at least for recorded music. The general theme of the theoretical discussion in this paper is a simplicity-flexibility trade-off. On the one hand, CCS seek to reduce the costs of administering and trading copyrights online. On the other hand, standard copyright licenses distort the market mechanism. This paper discusses the costs and benefits of various CCS proposals compared to alternative ways of managing copyright online.
|
| van Gompel, S.
Ten geleide: 'A je to!' 25 jaar Wet op de naburige rechten AMI, 2018 (6), pp. 235, 2019. @article{vanGompel2019,
title = {Ten geleide: 'A je to!' 25 jaar Wet op de naburige rechten}, author = {van Gompel, S.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AMI_2018_6.pdf}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-01-11}, journal = {AMI}, volume = {2018}, number = {6}, pages = {235}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Hugenholtz, P.
De naburige rechten hebben hun tijd gehad AMI, 2018 (6), pp. 243-244, 2019. @article{Hugenholtz2019,
title = {De naburige rechten hebben hun tijd gehad}, author = {Hugenholtz, P.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AMI_2018_6-3.pdf}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-01-11}, journal = {AMI}, volume = {2018}, number = {6}, pages = {243-244}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Gervais, D.J.
Related rights in United States law AMI, 2018 (6), pp. 245-251, 2019. @article{Gervais2019,
title = {Related rights in United States law}, author = {Gervais, D.J.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AMI_2018_6-2.pdf}, year = {2019}, date = {2019-01-11}, journal = {AMI}, volume = {2018}, number = {6}, pages = {245-251}, abstract = {This article explains the origin of the rights of performers, sound recording producers, audiovisual producers and broadcasters in the United States. As US law does not formally recognize a category of ‘related rights’, some of those rights exist under copyright law and are, therefore, subject to copyright rules such as the originality requirement, the possibility for authors to claim rights back 35 years after a transfer by contract, and the work-made-for-hire doctrine. Other rights are protected under different statutes.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This article explains the origin of the rights of performers, sound recording producers, audiovisual producers and broadcasters in the United States. As US law does not formally recognize a category of ‘related rights’, some of those rights exist under copyright law and are, therefore, subject to copyright rules such as the originality requirement, the possibility for authors to claim rights back 35 years after
a transfer by contract, and the work-made-for-hire doctrine. Other rights are protected under different statutes. |
| Coche, E.
Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2018. @article{Coche2018h,
title = {‘Hommage au fromage’ or how the CJEU said farewell to Heks’nkaas by excluding copyright protection for works of taste}, author = {Coche, E.}, url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2018/12/05/hommage-au-fromage-or-how-the-cjeu-said-farewell-to-heksnkaas-by-excluding-copyright-protection-for-works-of-taste/}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-12-05}, journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Kabel, J.
AMI, 2018 (5), pp. 203-206, 2018. @article{Kabel2018d,
title = {Tentoonstellen van ongepubliceerde brieven: Annotatie bij Hof Amsterdam 6 februari 2018 (Anne Frank Stichting / Anne Frank-Fonds)}, author = {Kabel, J.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_AMI_2018_5.pdf}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-10-30}, journal = {AMI}, volume = {2018}, number = {5}, pages = {203-206}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Hugenholtz, P.
Annotatie bij Geschillencommissie Auteurscontractenrecht 27 juli 2018 (Soof 2) AMI, 2018 (5), pp. 213-215, 2018. @article{Hugenholtz2018h,
title = {Annotatie bij Geschillencommissie Auteurscontractenrecht 27 juli 2018 (Soof 2)}, author = {Hugenholtz, P.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_AMI_2018_5-1.pdf}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-10-30}, journal = {AMI}, volume = {2018}, number = {5}, pages = {213-215}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Hugenholtz, P.
The WIPO Broadcasting Treaty. A Conceptual Conundrum 2018. @misc{Hugenholtz2018g,
title = {The WIPO Broadcasting Treaty. A Conceptual Conundrum}, author = {Hugenholtz, P.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Keynote_WIPO_Broadcasting_Treaty_2018.pdf}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-10-24}, abstract = {Keynote at KEI Seminar, Appraising the WIPO Broadcast Treaty and its Implications on Access to Culture, Geneva 3-4 October 2018}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Keynote at KEI Seminar, Appraising the WIPO Broadcast Treaty and its Implications on Access to Culture, Geneva 3-4 October 2018
|
| Breemen, J.
Protecting traditional cultural expressions – copyright tensions and human rights opportunities? G. Corradi K. de Feyter, Desmet Vanhees (eds.) E K (Ed.): Critical Indigenous Rights Studies, pp. 108-133, Routledge, 2018, ISBN: 9781138729339, ( Chapter in: Critical Indigenous Rights Studies, G. Corradi, K. de Feyter, E. Desmet, K. Vanhees (eds.), Routlegde, 2018.). @inbook{Breemen2018f,
title = {Protecting traditional cultural expressions \textendash copyright tensions and human rights opportunities?}, author = {Breemen, J.}, editor = {G. Corradi, K. de Feyter, E. Desmet, K. Vanhees (eds.)}, url = {https://www.routledge.com/Critical-Indigenous-Rights-Studies/Corradi-de-Feyter-Desmet-Vanhees/p/book/9781138729339}, isbn = {9781138729339}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-09-28}, urldate = {2018-09-28}, booktitle = {Critical Indigenous Rights Studies}, pages = {108-133}, publisher = {Routledge}, abstract = {The protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs) is not a straightforward issue. At first sight, characteristics of TCEs and their protection suggest similarity to copyright works. However, TCE protection should not be viewed as simply an (isolated) intellectual property issue. Rather, the protection of TCEs is part of a broader (political) context and struggle for rights. The chapter focuses on showing the complexity of the interrelation between copyright and indigenous peoples’ rights. It argues that a cultural and indigenous rights perspective could help address tensions deriving from differing worldviews, the application of dominant, existing legal frameworks and diverging understandings of protecting creativity and works of culture.}, note = { Chapter in: Critical Indigenous Rights Studies, G. Corradi, K. de Feyter, E. Desmet, K. Vanhees (eds.), Routlegde, 2018.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {inbook} } The protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs) is not a straightforward issue. At first sight, characteristics of TCEs and their protection suggest similarity to copyright works. However, TCE protection should not be viewed as simply an (isolated) intellectual property issue. Rather, the protection of TCEs is part of a broader (political) context and struggle for rights. The chapter focuses on showing the complexity of the interrelation between copyright and indigenous peoples’ rights. It argues that a cultural and indigenous rights perspective could help address tensions deriving from differing worldviews, the application of dominant, existing legal frameworks and diverging understandings of protecting creativity and works of culture.
|
| Hugenholtz, P.
De sluipende unificatie van het auteursrecht in Europa Berichten Industriële Eigendom (BIE), 2018 (4), pp. 157-161, 2018. @article{Hugenholtz2018f,
title = {De sluipende unificatie van het auteursrecht in Europa}, author = {Hugenholtz, P.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/BIE_2018_4.pdf}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-09-21}, journal = {Berichten Industri\"{e}le Eigendom (BIE)}, volume = {2018}, number = {4}, pages = {157-161}, abstract = {Nu de harmonisatie van de auteursrechtwetgeving in Europa bijna is afgerond, wint het idee van daadwerkelijke eenmaking van het auteursrecht in de Europese Unie terrein. In een mededeling over het EU-auteursrechtbeleid heeft de Europese Commissie de invoering van een unitair auteursrecht, dat voor de nationale auteurswetten van de lidstaten in de plaats zou moeten komen, als ‘langetermijnvisie’ vastgelegd. Desalniettemin lijkt formele unificatie in de vorm van een Auteursrechtverordening nog ver weg. Ondertussen maken de Europese wetgever en het Hof van Justitie stap voor stap een einde aan de territorialiteit van het auteursrecht, waardoor een eengemaakt Europees auteursrecht langzaam maar gestaag toch dichterbij komt. In dit artikel wordt dit proces van sluipende unificatie van het auteursrecht geschetst. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Nu de harmonisatie van de auteursrechtwetgeving in Europa bijna is afgerond, wint het idee van daadwerkelijke eenmaking van het auteursrecht in de Europese Unie terrein. In een mededeling over het EU-auteursrechtbeleid heeft de Europese Commissie de invoering van een unitair auteursrecht, dat voor de nationale auteurswetten van de lidstaten in de plaats zou moeten komen, als ‘langetermijnvisie’ vastgelegd. Desalniettemin lijkt formele unificatie in de vorm van een Auteursrechtverordening nog ver weg. Ondertussen maken de Europese wetgever en het Hof van Justitie stap voor stap een einde aan de territorialiteit van het auteursrecht, waardoor een eengemaakt Europees auteursrecht langzaam maar gestaag toch dichterbij komt. In dit artikel wordt dit proces van sluipende unificatie van het auteursrecht geschetst.
|
| Coche, E.
‘Quel dommage, cher fromage’ or how the AG said “no” to copyright protection for works of taste Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2018. @article{Coche2018f,
title = {‘Quel dommage, cher fromage’ or how the AG said “no” to copyright protection for works of taste}, author = {Coche, E.}, url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2018/09/20/quel-dommage-cher-fromage-ag-said-no-copyright-protection-works-taste/}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-09-21}, journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| van Eechoud, M.
AMI, 2018 (4), pp. 127-133, 2018. @article{vanEechoud2018,
title = {Bekeert Brussel zich tot artikel 8 Databankenwet? Opendatabeleid en de IE-positie van de publieke sector na herziening Richtlijn hergebruik overheidsinformatie}, author = {van Eechoud, M.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AMI_2018_4.pdf}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-09-18}, journal = {AMI}, volume = {2018}, number = {4}, pages = {127-133}, abstract = {De Europese Commissie zet in het kader van de ‘data-economiestrategie’ nieuwe stappen op het terrein van opendatabeleid. Het voorstel tot wijziging van Richtlijn 2003/98/EC inzake hergebruik van overheidsinformatie (PSI Directive) legt de mogelijkheid voor (semi)publieke instellingen om databank- en auteursrechten uit te oefenen verder aan banden. Er komt een vergaand verbod op de uitoefening van databankrechten. Ook vallen er straks meer semipublieke databronnen onder de hergebruikregels, uit nutssectoren, transport en onderzoek. Een analyse van de plannen.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } De Europese Commissie zet in het kader van de ‘data-economiestrategie’ nieuwe stappen op het terrein van opendatabeleid. Het voorstel tot wijziging van Richtlijn 2003/98/EC inzake hergebruik van overheidsinformatie (PSI Directive) legt de mogelijkheid voor (semi)publieke instellingen om databank- en auteursrechten uit te oefenen verder aan banden. Er komt een vergaand verbod op de uitoefening van databankrechten. Ook vallen er straks meer semipublieke databronnen onder de hergebruikregels, uit nutssectoren, transport en onderzoek. Een analyse van de plannen.
|
| Hins, A.
Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 4 mei 2018 (TMG Landelijke Media / De Staat der Nederlanden) AMI, 2018 (4), pp. 160-162, 2018. @article{Hins2018c,
title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 4 mei 2018 (TMG Landelijke Media / De Staat der Nederlanden)}, author = {Hins, A.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_AMI_2018_4.pdf}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-09-18}, journal = {AMI}, volume = {2018}, number = {4}, pages = {160-162}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Angelopoulos, C., Quintais, J.
Fixing Copyright Reform: How to Address Online Infringement and Bridge the Value Gap Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2018. @article{Angelopoulos2018,
title = {Fixing Copyright Reform: How to Address Online Infringement and Bridge the Value Gap}, author = {Angelopoulos, C. and Quintais, J.}, url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2018/08/30/fixing-copyright-reform-address-online-infringement-bridge-value-gap/}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-09-04}, journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Gervais, D.J.
International Intellectual Property's Institutional Problem Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2018. @article{Gervais2018b,
title = {International Intellectual Property's Institutional Problem}, author = {Gervais, D.J.}, url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2018/07/09/international-intellectual-propertys-institutional-problem/}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-07-10}, journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Bostyn, S., Jongh, T. de, Poort, J., Radauer, A.
Effects of Supplementary Protection Mechanisms for Pharmaceutical Products 2018, (Rapport met Technopolis Group over beschermingsmechanismen op het gebied van intellectueel eigendom met betrekking tot medicijnen.). @techreport{Jongh2018,
title = {Effects of Supplementary Protection Mechanisms for Pharmaceutical Products}, author = {Jongh, T. de and Radauer, A. and Bostyn, S. and Poort, J.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/effects-of-supplementary-protection-mechanisms-for-pharmaceutical-products.pdf}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-06-19}, note = {Rapport met Technopolis Group over beschermingsmechanismen op het gebied van intellectueel eigendom met betrekking tot medicijnen.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| Til, G. van
Waar het wringt: zoekmachines en hyperlinks als mededeling aan het publiek AMI, 2018 (3), pp. 103-109, 2018. @article{vanTil2018,
title = {Waar het wringt: zoekmachines en hyperlinks als mededeling aan het publiek}, author = {Til, G. van}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/artikel-Gijs-van-Til_AMI-2018-3.pdf}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-06-19}, journal = {AMI}, volume = {2018}, number = {3}, pages = {103-109}, abstract = {De recente jurisprudentie van het Hof van Justitie van de EU over de vraag of een hyperlink kwalificeert als mededeling aan het publiek, heeft al een hoop stof doen opwaaien. De gevolgen die deze uitspraken zouden kunnen hebben voor zoekmachines zijn tot op heden echter onderbelicht gebleven. Deze bijdrage bevat een analyse van de juridische positie van zoekmachines in het licht van de recente jurisprudentie.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } De recente jurisprudentie van het Hof van Justitie van de EU over de vraag of een hyperlink kwalificeert als mededeling aan het publiek, heeft al een hoop stof doen opwaaien. De gevolgen die deze uitspraken zouden kunnen hebben voor zoekmachines zijn tot op heden echter onderbelicht gebleven. Deze bijdrage bevat een analyse van de juridische positie van zoekmachines in het licht van de recente jurisprudentie.
|
| Poort, J., Quintais, J.
A Brief History of Value Gaps: Pre-Internet Copyright Protection and Exploitation Models 2018 , Chapter 2, pp. 11-58, Wolters Kluwer, 2018, (Chapter in: Copyright Reconstructed: Rethinking Copyright's Economic Rights in a Time of Highly Dynamic Technological and Economic Change, Hugenholtz, P.B. ed., Information Law Series, no. 41, Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2018. ISBN: 9789041191038). @inbook{Quintais2018f,
title = {A Brief History of Value Gaps: Pre-Internet Copyright Protection and Exploitation Models}, author = {Quintais, J. and Poort, J.}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-05-03}, volume = {2018}, pages = {11-58}, publisher = {Wolters Kluwer}, chapter = {2}, series = {Information Law Series}, note = {Chapter in: Copyright Reconstructed: Rethinking Copyright's Economic Rights in a Time of Highly Dynamic Technological and Economic Change, Hugenholtz, P.B. ed., Information Law Series, no. 41, Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2018. ISBN: 9789041191038}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {inbook} } |
| Poort, J., Rognstad, O-A.
The Right to Reasonable Exploitation Concretized: An Incentive Based Approach 2018 , 2018, (Chapter in: Copyright Reconstructed: Rethinking Copyright's Economic Rights in a Time of Highly Dynamic Technological and Economic Change, Hugenholtz, P.B. ed., Information Law Series, no. 41, Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2018. ISBN: 9789041191038). @inbook{Rognstad2018,
title = {The Right to Reasonable Exploitation Concretized: An Incentive Based Approach}, author = {Rognstad, O-A. and Poort, J.}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-05-03}, volume = {2018}, note = {Chapter in: Copyright Reconstructed: Rethinking Copyright's Economic Rights in a Time of Highly Dynamic Technological and Economic Change, Hugenholtz, P.B. ed., Information Law Series, no. 41, Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2018. ISBN: 9789041191038}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {inbook} } |
| Hugenholtz, P., Quintais, J.
Towards a Universal Rights of Remuneration: Legalizing the Non-commercial Online Use of Works 2018, (Chapter in: Copyright Reconstructed: Rethinking Copyright's Economic Rights in a Time of Highly Dynamic Technological and Economic Change, Hugenholtz, P.B. ed., Information Law Series, no. 41, Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2018. ISBN: 9789041191038). @inbook{Hugenholtz2018i,
title = {Towards a Universal Rights of Remuneration: Legalizing the Non-commercial Online Use of Works}, author = {Hugenholtz, P. and Quintais, J.}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-05-03}, note = {Chapter in: Copyright Reconstructed: Rethinking Copyright's Economic Rights in a Time of Highly Dynamic Technological and Economic Change, Hugenholtz, P.B. ed., Information Law Series, no. 41, Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2018. ISBN: 9789041191038}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {inbook} } |
| Poort, J.
Borderlines of Copyright Protection: An Economic Analysis 2018, (Chapter in: Copyright Reconstructed: Rethinking Copyright's Economic Rights in a Time of Highly Dynamic Technological and Economic Change, Hugenholtz, P.B. ed., Information Law Series, no. 41, Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2018. ISBN: 9789041191038). @inbook{Poort2018c,
title = {Borderlines of Copyright Protection: An Economic Analysis}, author = {Poort, J.}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-05-03}, note = {Chapter in: Copyright Reconstructed: Rethinking Copyright's Economic Rights in a Time of Highly Dynamic Technological and Economic Change, Hugenholtz, P.B. ed., Information Law Series, no. 41, Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2018. ISBN: 9789041191038}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {inbook} } |
| Hugenholtz, P.
Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 7 juli 2017 (Nanada / Golden Earring) AMI, 2018 (2), pp. 84-86, 2018. @article{Hugenholtz2018c,
title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 7 juli 2017 (Nanada / Golden Earring)}, author = {Hugenholtz, P.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_AMI_2018_2.pdf}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-04-19}, journal = {AMI}, volume = {2018}, number = {2}, pages = {84-86}, abstract = {Buitengerechtelijke ontbinding van muziekuitgave-overeenkomsten wegens tekortschieten door uitgever in exploitatieverplichting: klachtplicht (art. 6:89 BW) geldt niet bij voortdurend tekortschieten. Muziekuitgavecontracten zijn duurovereenkomsten voor onbepaalde tijd die in beginsel kunnen worden opgezegd, maar daarvoor moeten blijkens art. 25(e) Aw zwaarwegende gronden bestaan.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Buitengerechtelijke ontbinding van muziekuitgave-overeenkomsten wegens tekortschieten door uitgever in exploitatieverplichting: klachtplicht (art. 6:89 BW) geldt niet bij voortdurend tekortschieten. Muziekuitgavecontracten
zijn duurovereenkomsten voor onbepaalde tijd die in beginsel kunnen worden opgezegd, maar daarvoor moeten blijkens art. 25(e) Aw zwaarwegende gronden bestaan. |
| Kabel, J.
Annotatie bij Hof Amsterdam 30 januari 2018 (Schaap / Gemeente Amsterdam) AMI, 2018 (2), pp. 89-90, 2018. @article{Kabel2018b,
title = {Annotatie bij Hof Amsterdam 30 januari 2018 (Schaap / Gemeente Amsterdam)}, author = {Kabel, J.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_AMI_2018_2-1.pdf}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-04-19}, journal = {AMI}, volume = {2018}, number = {2}, pages = {89-90}, abstract = {Vordering tegen de Gemeente Amsterdam tot plaatsing op de afgesproken locatie op de groenstrook langs de Theophile de Bockstraat in Amsterdam-Zuid door de maker Femke Schaap van het kunstwerk ‘Westland Wells’, ondanks hardnekkig verzet door de buurtbewoners tegen die plaatsing. Het hof is niet gebonden aan de belangenafweging die heeft geleid tot verlening van een omgevingsvergunning voor plaatsing op de afgesproken locatie. De gemeente is op grond van de overeenkomst van opdracht niet verplicht om het kunstwerk te plaatsen op de oorspronkelijk overeengekomen locatie, maar, gezien de strekking van de overeenkomst, wel tot plaatsing elders. De auteursrechtelijke grondslag ter onderbouwing van vordering is nu de contractuele grondslag is toegewezen niet meer van belang. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Vordering tegen de Gemeente Amsterdam tot plaatsing op de afgesproken locatie op de groenstrook langs de Theophile de Bockstraat in Amsterdam-Zuid door de maker Femke Schaap van het kunstwerk ‘Westland Wells’,
ondanks hardnekkig verzet door de buurtbewoners tegen die plaatsing. Het hof is niet gebonden aan de belangenafweging die heeft geleid tot verlening van een omgevingsvergunning voor plaatsing op de afgesproken locatie. De gemeente is op grond van de overeenkomst van opdracht niet verplicht om het kunstwerk te plaatsen op de oorspronkelijk overeengekomen locatie, maar, gezien de strekking van de overeenkomst, wel tot plaatsing elders. De auteursrechtelijke grondslag ter onderbouwing van vordering is nu de contractuele grondslag is toegewezen niet meer van belang. |
| Hugenholtz, P.
Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, 2018 (13), pp. 1672-1674, 2018. @article{Hugenholtz2018b,
title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 27 maart 2014 (UPC Telekabel Wien / Constantin Film Verleih & Wega Filmproduktionsgesellschaft) en Hoge Raad 13 november 2015 (Stichting Brein / Ziggo & XS4ALL)}, author = {Hugenholtz, P.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2018_110.pdf}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-04-03}, journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie}, volume = {2018}, number = {13}, pages = {1672-1674}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Hugenholtz, P.
Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, 2018 (13), pp. 1700-1705, 2018. @article{Hugenholtz2018,
title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 13 februari 2014 (Svensson / Retriever Sverige), Hof van Justitie EU 8 september 2016 (GS Media / Sanoma Media Netherlands), Hof van Justitie EU 26 april 2017 (Stichting Brein / J.F. Wullems) en Hof van Justitie EU 14 juni 2017 (Stichting Brein / Ziggo & XS4ALL Internet)}, author = {Hugenholtz, P.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2018_114.pdf}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-03-26}, journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie}, volume = {2018}, number = {13}, pages = {1700-1705}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |