Algorithmic propagation: do property rights in data increase bias in content moderation? – Part II external link

Margoni, T., Quintais, J. & Schwemer, S.
Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2022

Art. 17 CDSM Directive, Artificial intelligence, Auteursrecht, frontpage

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Algorithmic propagation: do property rights in data increase bias in content moderation? – Part II}, author = {Margoni, T. and Quintais, J. and Schwemer, S.}, url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/06/09/algorithmic-propagation-do-property-rights-in-data-increase-bias-in-content-moderation-part-ii/}, year = {0609}, date = {2022-06-09}, journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog}, keywords = {Art. 17 CDSM Directive, Artificial intelligence, Auteursrecht, frontpage}, }

Algorithmic propagation: do property rights in data increase bias in content moderation? Part I external link

Margoni, T., Quintais, J. & Schwemer, S.
Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2022

algoritmes, Art. 17 CDSM Directive, Artificial intelligence, Auteursrecht, Europees recht, frontpage

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Algorithmic propagation: do property rights in data increase bias in content moderation? Part I}, author = {Margoni, T. and Quintais, J. and Schwemer, S.}, url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/06/08/algorithmic-propagation-do-property-rights-in-data-increase-bias-in-content-moderation-part-i/}, year = {0608}, date = {2022-06-08}, journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog}, keywords = {algoritmes, Art. 17 CDSM Directive, Artificial intelligence, Auteursrecht, Europees recht, frontpage}, }

AI Music Outputs: Challenges to the Copyright Legal Framework – Part II external link

Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2022

Artificial intelligence, Auteursrecht, frontpage, muziek

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {AI Music Outputs: Challenges to the Copyright Legal Framework – Part II}, author = {Bulayenko, O. and Poort, J. and Quintais, J. and Gervais, D.J.}, url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/04/25/ai-music-outputs-challenges-to-the-copyright-legal-framework-part-ii/}, year = {0502}, date = {2022-05-02}, journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog}, keywords = {Artificial intelligence, Auteursrecht, frontpage, muziek}, }

AI Music Outputs: Challenges to the Copyright Legal Framework – Part I external link

Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2022

Artificial intelligence, Copyright, frontpage, muziek

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {AI Music Outputs: Challenges to the Copyright Legal Framework – Part I}, author = {Bulayenko, O. and Quintais, J. and Poort, J. and Gervais, D.J.}, url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/04/22/ai-music-outputs-challenges-to-the-copyright-legal-framework-part-i/}, year = {0422}, date = {2022-04-22}, journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog}, keywords = {Artificial intelligence, Copyright, frontpage, muziek}, }

AI Music Outputs: Challenges to the Copyright Legal Framework download

2022

Abstract

This report examines the application of EU copyright and related rights law to outputs generated by or with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) systems, tools or techniques (AI outputs), with a focus on outputs in the musical domain. The Report examines the question: How can and should EU copyright and related rights law protect AI musical outputs? The interdisciplinary (legal and empirical) research involves: (i) analyzing of the protection of AI outputs under EU copyright and related rights law; (ii) examining the attribution of authorship and ownership to (natural and legal) persons involved in the creation or production of AI outputs; (iii) proposing interpretative guidelines and policy recommendations on increasing legal certainty regarding the protection, authorship, and ownership of copyright and related rights over AI outputs, especially music outputs.

Artificial intelligence, computer-generated works, Copyright, EU, Intellectual property, music, originality, related rights

Bibtex

Report{nokey, title = {AI Music Outputs: Challenges to the Copyright Legal Framework}, author = {Bulayenko, O. and Quintais, J. and Gervais, D.J. and Poort, J.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publications/ai-music-outputs-challenges-to-the-copyright-legal-framework/870626_d3-5-final-report-on-the-impact-of-ia-authorship_formatted-1/}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6405796}, year = {2022}, date = {2022-04-01}, abstract = {This report examines the application of EU copyright and related rights law to outputs generated by or with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) systems, tools or techniques (AI outputs), with a focus on outputs in the musical domain. The Report examines the question: How can and should EU copyright and related rights law protect AI musical outputs? The interdisciplinary (legal and empirical) research involves: (i) analyzing of the protection of AI outputs under EU copyright and related rights law; (ii) examining the attribution of authorship and ownership to (natural and legal) persons involved in the creation or production of AI outputs; (iii) proposing interpretative guidelines and policy recommendations on increasing legal certainty regarding the protection, authorship, and ownership of copyright and related rights over AI outputs, especially music outputs.}, keywords = {Artificial intelligence, computer-generated works, Copyright, EU, Intellectual property, music, originality, related rights}, }

The Algorithmic Learning Deficit: Artificial Intelligence, Data Protection and Trade external link

Big Data and Global Trade Law, Mira Burri (ed.) Cambridge University Press, 2021, 0210, pp: 212-230

algorithms, Artificial intelligence, frontpage, handelsrecht, Recht op gegevensbescherming

Bibtex

Chapter{nokey, title = {The Algorithmic Learning Deficit: Artificial Intelligence, Data Protection and Trade}, author = {Yakovleva, S. and van Hoboken, J.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/the-algorithmic-learning-deficit.pdf}, doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108919234.014}, year = {0210}, date = {2022-02-10}, keywords = {algorithms, Artificial intelligence, frontpage, handelsrecht, Recht op gegevensbescherming}, }

‘Voetbal Hoort niet bij Robots’: Attitudes Regarding the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Refereeing download

Helberger, N. & Zarouali, B.
Intellectual Property and Sports: Essays in Honour of P. Bernt Hugenholtz, Wolters Kluwer, 2021, Series: Information Law Series, pp: 395-409, ISBN: 9789403537337

Artificial intelligence, hugenholtz league, Intellectuele eigendom, Kluwer Information Law Series, sports

Bibtex

Chapter{nokey, title = {‘Voetbal Hoort niet bij Robots’: Attitudes Regarding the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Refereeing}, author = {Helberger, N. and Zarouali, B.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publications/voetbal-hoort-niet-bij-robots-attitudes-regarding-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-in-refereeing/ils46_helberger_zarouali/}, year = {2021}, date = {2021-11-30}, keywords = {Artificial intelligence, hugenholtz league, Intellectuele eigendom, Kluwer Information Law Series, sports}, }

Governing “European values” inside data flows: : interdisciplinary perspectives external link

Irion, K., Kolk, A., Buri, M. & Milan, S.
Internet Policy Review, vol. 10, num: 3, 2021

Abstract

This editorial introduces ten research articles, which form part of this special issue, exploring the governance of “European values” inside data flows. Protecting fundamental human rights and critical public interests that undergird European societies in a global digital ecosystem poses complex challenges, especially because the United States and China are leading in novel technologies. We envision a research agenda calling upon different disciplines to further identify and understand European values that can adequately perform under conditions of transnational data flows.

Artificial intelligence, Data flows, Data governance, Digital connectivity, European Union, European values, Human rights, Internet governance, Personal data protection, Public policy, Societal values

Bibtex

Article{Irion2021e, title = {Governing “European values” inside data flows: : interdisciplinary perspectives}, author = {Irion, K. and Kolk, A. and Buri, M. and Milan, S.}, url = {https://policyreview.info/european-values}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.3.1582}, year = {1011}, date = {2021-10-11}, journal = {Internet Policy Review}, volume = {10}, number = {3}, pages = {}, abstract = {This editorial introduces ten research articles, which form part of this special issue, exploring the governance of “European values” inside data flows. Protecting fundamental human rights and critical public interests that undergird European societies in a global digital ecosystem poses complex challenges, especially because the United States and China are leading in novel technologies. We envision a research agenda calling upon different disciplines to further identify and understand European values that can adequately perform under conditions of transnational data flows.}, keywords = {Artificial intelligence, Data flows, Data governance, Digital connectivity, European Union, European values, Human rights, Internet governance, Personal data protection, Public policy, Societal values}, }

Copyright and Artificial Creation: Does EU Copyright Law Protect AI-Assisted Output? external link

IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law , vol. 52, num: 9, pp: 1190-1216, 2021

Abstract

This article queries whether and to what extent works produced with the aid of AI systems – AI-assisted output – are protected under EU copyright standards. We carry out a doctrinal legal analysis to scrutinise the concepts of “work”, “originality” and “creative freedom”, as well as the notion of authorship, as set forth in the EU copyright acquis and developed in the case-law of the Court of Justice. On this basis, we develop a four-step test to assess whether AI-assisted output qualifies as an original work of authorship under EU law, and how the existing rules on authorship may apply. Our conclusion is that current EU copyright rules are generally suitable and sufficiently flexible to deal with the challenges posed by AI-assisted output.

Artificial intelligence, Auteursrecht, frontpage

Bibtex

Article{Hugenholtz2021d, title = {Copyright and Artificial Creation: Does EU Copyright Law Protect AI-Assisted Output?}, author = {Hugenholtz, P. and Quintais, J.}, url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40319-021-01115-0}, doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-021-01115-0}, year = {1007}, date = {2021-10-07}, journal = {IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law }, volume = {52}, number = {9}, pages = {1190-1216}, abstract = {This article queries whether and to what extent works produced with the aid of AI systems – AI-assisted output – are protected under EU copyright standards. We carry out a doctrinal legal analysis to scrutinise the concepts of “work”, “originality” and “creative freedom”, as well as the notion of authorship, as set forth in the EU copyright acquis and developed in the case-law of the Court of Justice. On this basis, we develop a four-step test to assess whether AI-assisted output qualifies as an original work of authorship under EU law, and how the existing rules on authorship may apply. Our conclusion is that current EU copyright rules are generally suitable and sufficiently flexible to deal with the challenges posed by AI-assisted output.}, keywords = {Artificial intelligence, Auteursrecht, frontpage}, }

Panta Rhei: A European Perspective on Ensuring a High Level of Protection of Human Rights in a World in Which Everything Flows external link

Big Data and Global Trade Law, Cambridge University Press, 2021

Abstract

Human rights do remain valid currency in how we approach planetary-scale computation and accompanying data flows. Today’s system of human rights protection, however, is highly dependent on domestic legal institutions, which unravel faster than the reconstruction of fitting transnational governance institutions. The chapter takes a critical look at the construction of the data flow metaphor as a policy concept inside international trade law. Subsequently, it explores how the respect for human rights ties in with national constitutionalism that becomes increasingly challenged by the transnational dynamic of digital era transactions. Lastly, the chapter turns to international trade law and why its ambitions to govern cross-border data flows will likely not advance efforts to generate respect for human rights. In conclusion, the chapter advocates for a rebalancing act that recognizes human rights inside international trade law.

Artificial intelligence, EU law, frontpage, Human rights, Transparency, WTO law

Bibtex

Chapter{Irion2021bb, title = {Panta Rhei: A European Perspective on Ensuring a High Level of Protection of Human Rights in a World in Which Everything Flows}, author = {Irion, K.}, url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/big-data-and-global-trade-law/panta-rhei/B0E5D7851240E0D2F4562B3C6DFF3011}, doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108919234.015}, year = {2021}, date = {2021-07-05}, abstract = {Human rights do remain valid currency in how we approach planetary-scale computation and accompanying data flows. Today’s system of human rights protection, however, is highly dependent on domestic legal institutions, which unravel faster than the reconstruction of fitting transnational governance institutions. The chapter takes a critical look at the construction of the data flow metaphor as a policy concept inside international trade law. Subsequently, it explores how the respect for human rights ties in with national constitutionalism that becomes increasingly challenged by the transnational dynamic of digital era transactions. Lastly, the chapter turns to international trade law and why its ambitions to govern cross-border data flows will likely not advance efforts to generate respect for human rights. In conclusion, the chapter advocates for a rebalancing act that recognizes human rights inside international trade law.}, keywords = {Artificial intelligence, EU law, frontpage, Human rights, Transparency, WTO law}, }