Europeana Awareness
IViR's role in the follow-up project of EuropeanaConnect – called Europeana Awareness – concentrates on doing research into licensing models that allow the digitization and online availability of cultural heritage objects from the 20th century. Extended collective licensing agreements provide one opportunity to mitigate the effects of the orphan works crisis that causes a significant underrepresentation of cultural heritage objects from the 20th century in Europeana. Other models are considered as well, and attention is paid to the issue of the cross-border dissemination of 20th century objects. The IVIR will undertake research into the possibilities these models offer for cultural heritage institutions contributing to Europeana.
Publications
van Daalen, O.
In defense of offense: information security research under the right to science Journal Article
In: Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 46, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {In defense of offense: information security research under the right to science},
author = {van Daalen, O.},
doi = {10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105706},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-07-12},
journal = {Computer Law \& Security Review},
volume = {46},
abstract = {Information security is something you do, not something you have. It's a recurring process of finding weaknesses and fixing them, only for the next weakness to be discovered, and fixed, and so on. Yet, European Union rules in this field are not built around this cycle of making and breaking: doing offensive information security research is not always legal, and doubts about its legality can have a chilling effect. At the same time, the results of such research are sometimes not used to allow others to take defensive measures, but instead are used to attack. In this article, I review whether states have an obligation under the right to science and the right to communications freedom to develop governance which addresses these two issues. I first discuss the characteristics of this cycle of making and breaking. I then discuss the rules in the European Union with regard to this cycle. Then I discuss how the right to science and the right to communications freedom under the European Convention for Human Rights , the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights apply to this domain. I then conclude that states must recognise a right to research information security vulnerabilities, but that this right comes with a duty of researchers to disclose their findings in a way which strengthens information security.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Information security is something you do, not something you have. It's a recurring process of finding weaknesses and fixing them, only for the next weakness to be discovered, and fixed, and so on. Yet, European Union rules in this field are not built around this cycle of making and breaking: doing offensive information security research is not always legal, and doubts about its legality can have a chilling effect. At the same time, the results of such research are sometimes not used to allow others to take defensive measures, but instead are used to attack. In this article, I review whether states have an obligation under the right to science and the right to communications freedom to develop governance which addresses these two issues. I first discuss the characteristics of this cycle of making and breaking. I then discuss the rules in the European Union with regard to this cycle. Then I discuss how the right to science and the right to communications freedom under the European Convention for Human Rights , the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights apply to this domain. I then conclude that states must recognise a right to research information security vulnerabilities, but that this right comes with a duty of researchers to disclose their findings in a way which strengthens information security.
Trapova, A.; Quintais, J.
EU copyright law round up – second trimester of 2022 Journal Article
In: Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {EU copyright law round up \textendash second trimester of 2022},
author = {Trapova, A. and Quintais, J.},
url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/07/07/eu-copyright-law-round-up-second-trimester-of-2022/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-07-08},
journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Reda, F.; Keller, P.
Filtered Futures Conference: Exploring the Fundamental Rights Constraints of Automated Filtering After the CJEU Ruling on Article 17 Journal Article
In: Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {Filtered Futures Conference: Exploring the Fundamental Rights Constraints of Automated Filtering After the CJEU Ruling on Article 17},
author = {Reda, F. and Keller, P.},
url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/06/17/filtered-futures-conference-exploring-the-fundamental-rights-constraints-of-automated-filtering-after-the-cjeu-ruling-on-article-17/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-06-17},
journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Irion, K.
In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’22), June 21–24, 2022, Seoul, Republic of Korea. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2022.
@proceedings{Irion2022b,
title = {Algorithms Off-limits? If digital trade law restricts access to source code of software then accountability will suffer},
author = {Irion, K.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/facct22-125-2/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-06-17},
urldate = {2022-06-17},
abstract = {Free trade agreements are increasingly used to construct an additional layer of protection for source code of software. This comes in the shape of a new prohibition for governments to require access to, or transfer of, source code of software, subject to certain exceptions. A clause on software source code is also part and parcel of an ambitious set of new rules on trade-related aspects of electronic commerce currently negotiated by 86 members of the World Trade Organization. Our understanding to date of how such a commitment inside trade law impacts on governments right to regulate digital technologies and the policy space that is allowed under trade law is limited. Access to software source code is for example necessary to meet regulatory and judicial needs in order to ensure that digital technologies are in conformity with individuals’ human rights and societal values. This article will analyze the implications of such a source code clause for current and future digital policies by governments that aim to ensure transparency, fairness and accountability of computer and machine learning algorithms.},
howpublished = {In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’22), June 21\textendash24, 2022, Seoul, Republic of Korea. ACM, New York, NY, USA},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {proceedings}
}
Free trade agreements are increasingly used to construct an additional layer of protection for source code of software. This comes in the shape of a new prohibition for governments to require access to, or transfer of, source code of software, subject to certain exceptions. A clause on software source code is also part and parcel of an ambitious set of new rules on trade-related aspects of electronic commerce currently negotiated by 86 members of the World Trade Organization. Our understanding to date of how such a commitment inside trade law impacts on governments right to regulate digital technologies and the policy space that is allowed under trade law is limited. Access to software source code is for example necessary to meet regulatory and judicial needs in order to ensure that digital technologies are in conformity with individuals’ human rights and societal values. This article will analyze the implications of such a source code clause for current and future digital policies by governments that aim to ensure transparency, fairness and accountability of computer and machine learning algorithms.
Janssen, H.; Seng Ah Lee, M.; Singh, J.; Cobbe, J.
Defining the scope of AI ADM system risk assessment Book Chapter
In: Research handbook on EU data protection law, E. Kosta, R. Leenes & I. Kamara (ed.), Chapter 16, pp. 405-434, Edgar Elgar Publishing, 2022.
@inbook{nokey,
title = {Defining the scope of AI ADM system risk assessment},
author = {Janssen, H. and Seng Ah Lee, M. and Singh, J. and Cobbe, J.},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-06-16},
booktitle = {Research handbook on EU data protection law, E. Kosta, R. Leenes \& I. Kamara (ed.)},
pages = {405-434},
publisher = {Edgar Elgar Publishing},
chapter = {16},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Janssen, H.; Singh, J.
Data intermediary Journal Article
In: Internet Policy Review, vol. 11, iss. 1, 2022, (Glossary of decentralised technosocial systems).
@article{nokey,
title = {Data intermediary},
author = {Janssen, H. and Singh, J.},
doi = {10.14763/2022.1.1644},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-06-16},
journal = {Internet Policy Review},
volume = {11},
issue = {1},
abstract = {Data intermediaries serve as a mediator between those who wish to make their data available, and those who seek to leverage that data. The intermediary works to govern the data in specific ways, and provides some degree of confidence regarding how the data will be used.},
note = {Glossary of decentralised technosocial systems},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Data intermediaries serve as a mediator between those who wish to make their data available, and those who seek to leverage that data. The intermediary works to govern the data in specific ways, and provides some degree of confidence regarding how the data will be used.
Janssen, H.; Singh, J.
Personal Information Management Systems Journal Article
In: Internet Policy Review, vol. 11, iss. 2, 2022, (Glossary of decentralised technosocial systems).
@article{nokey,
title = {Personal Information Management Systems},
author = {Janssen, H. and Singh, J.},
doi = {10.14763/2022.2.1659 },
year = {2022},
date = {2022-06-16},
urldate = {2022-06-16},
journal = {Internet Policy Review},
volume = {11},
issue = {2},
abstract = {Personal Information Management Systems (PIMS) seek to empower users by equipping them with mechanisms for mediating, monitoring and controlling how their data is accessed, used, or shared.},
note = {Glossary of decentralised technosocial systems},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Personal Information Management Systems (PIMS) seek to empower users by equipping them with mechanisms for mediating, monitoring and controlling how their data is accessed, used, or shared.
Leerssen, P.
Annotatie bij Rb Noord-Holland 6 oktober 2021 (Kamerlid / LinkedIn Ierland & LinkedIn Nederland) Journal Article
In: Computerrecht, iss. 3, no. 97, pp. 228-230, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {Annotatie bij Rb Noord-Holland 6 oktober 2021 (Kamerlid / LinkedIn Ierland \& LinkedIn Nederland)},
author = {Leerssen, P.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/annotatie_computerrecht_2022_97/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-06-16},
journal = {Computerrecht},
number = {97},
issue = {3},
pages = {228-230},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Mil, J. van; Quintais, J.
A Matter of (Joint) control? Virtual assistants and the general data protection regulation Journal Article
In: Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 45, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {A Matter of (Joint) control? Virtual assistants and the general data protection regulation},
author = {Mil, J. van and Quintais, J.},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105689},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-06-16},
journal = {Computer Law \& Security Review},
volume = {45},
abstract = {This article provides an overview and critical examination of the rules for determining who qualifies as controller or joint controller under the General Data Protection Regulation. Using Google Assistant \textendash an artificial intelligence-driven virtual assistant \textendash as a case study, we argue that these rules are overreaching and difficult to apply in the present-day information society and Internet of Things environments. First, as a consequence of recent developments in case law and supervisory guidance, these rules lead to a complex and ambiguous test to determine (joint) control. Second, due to advances in technological applications and business models, it is increasingly challenging to apply such rules to contemporary processing operations. In particular, as illustrated by the Google Assistant, individuals will likely be qualified as joint controllers, together with Google and also third-party developers, for at least the collection and possible transmission of other individuals’ personal data via the virtual assistant. Third, we identify follow-on issues relating to the apportionment of responsibilities between joint controllers and the effective and complete protection of data subjects. We conclude by questioning whether the framework for determining who qualifies as controller or joint controller is future-proof and normatively desirable.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This article provides an overview and critical examination of the rules for determining who qualifies as controller or joint controller under the General Data Protection Regulation. Using Google Assistant – an artificial intelligence-driven virtual assistant – as a case study, we argue that these rules are overreaching and difficult to apply in the present-day information society and Internet of Things environments. First, as a consequence of recent developments in case law and supervisory guidance, these rules lead to a complex and ambiguous test to determine (joint) control. Second, due to advances in technological applications and business models, it is increasingly challenging to apply such rules to contemporary processing operations. In particular, as illustrated by the Google Assistant, individuals will likely be qualified as joint controllers, together with Google and also third-party developers, for at least the collection and possible transmission of other individuals’ personal data via the virtual assistant. Third, we identify follow-on issues relating to the apportionment of responsibilities between joint controllers and the effective and complete protection of data subjects. We conclude by questioning whether the framework for determining who qualifies as controller or joint controller is future-proof and normatively desirable.
Poort, J.
Inbreng Rondetafelgesprek over de Wet kansspelen op afstand Technical Report
2022, (Position paper voor Rondetafelgesprek van de Vaste commissie voor Justitie en Veiligheid, 9 juni 2022).
@techreport{nokey,
title = {Inbreng Rondetafelgesprek over de Wet kansspelen op afstand},
author = {Poort, J.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/inbreng-rondetafel_kansspelen_9juni2022/
https://debatgemist.tweedekamer.nl/debatten/wet-kansspelen-op-afstand},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-06-09},
urldate = {2022-06-09},
note = {Position paper voor Rondetafelgesprek van de Vaste commissie voor Justitie en Veiligheid, 9 juni 2022},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
Margoni, T.; Quintais, J.; Schwemer, S.
Algorithmic propagation: do property rights in data increase bias in content moderation? – Part II Journal Article
In: Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {Algorithmic propagation: do property rights in data increase bias in content moderation? \textendash Part II},
author = {Margoni, T. and Quintais, J. and Schwemer, S.},
url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/06/09/algorithmic-propagation-do-property-rights-in-data-increase-bias-in-content-moderation-part-ii/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-06-09},
journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Margoni, T.; Quintais, J.; Schwemer, S.
Algorithmic propagation: do property rights in data increase bias in content moderation? Part I Journal Article
In: Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {Algorithmic propagation: do property rights in data increase bias in content moderation? Part I},
author = {Margoni, T. and Quintais, J. and Schwemer, S.},
url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/06/08/algorithmic-propagation-do-property-rights-in-data-increase-bias-in-content-moderation-part-i/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-06-08},
journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Poort, J.
Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 12 december 2021 (SENA/Organisatoren Dance Events) Journal Article
In: Auteursrecht, iss. 2, no. 4, pp. 107-109, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 12 december 2021 (SENA/Organisatoren Dance Events)},
author = {Poort, J.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/annotatie_auteursrecht_2022_2/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-06-07},
journal = {Auteursrecht},
number = {4},
issue = {2},
pages = {107-109},
abstract = {De zaak draait om de hoogte van de billijke vergoeding voor openbaarmaking van commerci\"{e}le fonogrammen tijdens dance-evenementen. De Hoge Raad bekrachtigt het arrest van het gerechtshof Den Haag, dat tot uitgangspunt had genomen dat tussen de ‘ticketprijs’ en de ‘prijs per bezoeker’ geen recht evenredig verband bestaat.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
De zaak draait om de hoogte van de billijke vergoeding voor openbaarmaking van commerciële fonogrammen tijdens dance-evenementen. De Hoge Raad bekrachtigt het arrest van het gerechtshof Den Haag, dat tot uitgangspunt had genomen dat tussen de ‘ticketprijs’ en de ‘prijs per bezoeker’ geen recht evenredig verband bestaat.
Hugenholtz, P.
De playlists van Spotify: Hoe ver reikt het nabuurrechtelijke vergoedingsrecht met betrekking tot audiostreamingdiensten? Journal Article
In: Auteursrecht, iss. 2, pp. 75-84, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {De playlists van Spotify: Hoe ver reikt het nabuurrechtelijke vergoedingsrecht met betrekking tot audiostreamingdiensten?},
author = {Hugenholtz, P.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/auteursrecht_2022_2/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-06-07},
journal = {Auteursrecht},
issue = {2},
pages = {75-84},
abstract = {Op grond van art. 7 lid 1 WNR vallen onder het vergoedingsrecht voor ‘secundair gebruik’ alle mogelijke vormen van openbaarmaking van commercieel uitgebrachte fonogrammen, doch niet het online beschikbaar stellen. Algemeen wordt aangenomen dat het vergoedingsrecht niet geldt voor het streamen via Spotify en dergelijke diensten. Maar geldt dat ook voor de door Spotify aangeboden playlists en vergelijkbare omroepachtige diensten? In dit artikel wordt een poging gedaan criteria te formuleren aan de hand waarvan het ‘beschikbaar stellen’ van andere vormen van openbaarmaking kan worden onderscheiden.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Op grond van art. 7 lid 1 WNR vallen onder het vergoedingsrecht voor ‘secundair gebruik’ alle mogelijke vormen van openbaarmaking van commercieel uitgebrachte fonogrammen, doch niet het online beschikbaar stellen. Algemeen wordt aangenomen dat het vergoedingsrecht niet geldt voor het streamen via Spotify en dergelijke diensten. Maar geldt dat ook voor de door Spotify aangeboden playlists en vergelijkbare omroepachtige diensten? In dit artikel wordt een poging gedaan criteria te formuleren aan de hand waarvan het ‘beschikbaar stellen’ van andere vormen van openbaarmaking kan worden onderscheiden.
Dommering, E.
Naar een algemeen transparantiebeginsel? : Bespreking van het preadvies van A.W.G.J. Buijze voor de VAR 2022 Journal Article
In: Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Bestuursrecht, iss. 5, no. 141, pp. 265-271, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {Naar een algemeen transparantiebeginsel? : Bespreking van het preadvies van A.W.G.J. Buijze voor de VAR 2022},
author = {Dommering, E.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/ntb_2022_5_141/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-06-07},
urldate = {2022-06-07},
journal = {Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Bestuursrecht},
number = {141},
issue = {5},
pages = {265-271},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Senftleben, M.
In: Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {The Meaning of “Additional” in the Poland ruling of the Court of Justice: Double Safeguards \textendash Ex Ante Flagging and Ex Post Complaint Systems \textendash are Indispensable},
author = {Senftleben, M.},
url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/06/01/the-meaning-of-additional-in-the-poland-ruling-of-the-court-of-justice-double-safeguards-ex-ante-flagging-and-ex-post-complaint-systems-are-indispensable/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-06-02},
journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Helberger, N.; Sax, M.; Strycharz, J.; Micklitz, H. -W.
Choice Architectures in the Digital Economy: Towards a New Understanding of Digital Vulnerability Journal Article
In: Journal of Consumer Policy, vol. 45, iss. 2, pp. 175-200, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {Choice Architectures in the Digital Economy: Towards a New Understanding of Digital Vulnerability},
author = {Helberger, N. and Sax, M. and Strycharz, J. and Micklitz, H.-W.},
url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10603-021-09500-5},
doi = {10.1007/s10603-021-09500-5},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-05-24},
urldate = {2021-12-22},
journal = {Journal of Consumer Policy},
volume = {45},
issue = {2},
pages = {175-200},
abstract = {In the digital economy, consumer vulnerability is not simply a vantage point from which to assess some consumers’ lack of ability to activate their awareness of persuasion. Instead, digital vulnerability describes a universal state of defencelessness and susceptibility to (the exploitation of) power imbalances that are the result of the increasing automation of commerce, datafied consumer\textendashseller relations, and the very architecture of digital marketplaces. Digital vulnerability, we argue, is architectural, relational, and data-driven. Based on our concept of digital vulnerability, we demonstrate how and why using digital technology to render consumers vulnerable is the epitome of an unfair digital commercial practice.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
In the digital economy, consumer vulnerability is not simply a vantage point from which to assess some consumers’ lack of ability to activate their awareness of persuasion. Instead, digital vulnerability describes a universal state of defencelessness and susceptibility to (the exploitation of) power imbalances that are the result of the increasing automation of commerce, datafied consumer–seller relations, and the very architecture of digital marketplaces. Digital vulnerability, we argue, is architectural, relational, and data-driven. Based on our concept of digital vulnerability, we demonstrate how and why using digital technology to render consumers vulnerable is the epitome of an unfair digital commercial practice.
Bodó, B.; Janssen, H.
Maintaining trust in a technologized public sector Journal Article
In: Policy and Society, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {Maintaining trust in a technologized public sector},
author = {Bod\'{o}, B. and Janssen, H.},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puac019},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-05-19},
journal = {Policy and Society},
abstract = {Emerging technologies permeate and potentially disrupt a wide spectrum of our social, economic, and political relations. Various state institutions, including education, law enforcement, and healthcare, increasingly rely on technical components, such as automated decision-making systems, e-government systems, and other digital tools to provide cheap, efficient public services, and supposedly fair, transparent, disinterested, and accountable public administration. The increased interest in various blockchain-based solutions from central bank digital currencies, via tokenized educational credentials, and distributed ledger-based land registries to self-sovereign identities is the latest, still mostly unwritten chapter in a long history of standardized, objectified, automated, technocratic, and technologized public administration. The rapid, (often) unplanned, and uncontrolled technologization of public services (as happened in the hasty adoption of distance-learning and teleconferencing systems during Corona Virus Disease (COVID) lockdowns) raises complex questions about the use of novel technological components, which may or may not be ultimately adequate for the task for which they are used. The question whether we can trust the technical infrastructures the public sector uses when providing public services is a central concern in an age where trust in government is declining: If the government’s artificial intelligence system that detects welfare fraud fails, the public’s confidence in the government is ultimately hit. In this paper, we provide a critical assessment of how the use of potentially untrustworthy (private) technological systems including blockchain-based systems in the public sector may affect trust in government. We then propose several policy options to protect the trust in government even if some of their technological components prove fundamentally untrustworthy.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Emerging technologies permeate and potentially disrupt a wide spectrum of our social, economic, and political relations. Various state institutions, including education, law enforcement, and healthcare, increasingly rely on technical components, such as automated decision-making systems, e-government systems, and other digital tools to provide cheap, efficient public services, and supposedly fair, transparent, disinterested, and accountable public administration. The increased interest in various blockchain-based solutions from central bank digital currencies, via tokenized educational credentials, and distributed ledger-based land registries to self-sovereign identities is the latest, still mostly unwritten chapter in a long history of standardized, objectified, automated, technocratic, and technologized public administration. The rapid, (often) unplanned, and uncontrolled technologization of public services (as happened in the hasty adoption of distance-learning and teleconferencing systems during Corona Virus Disease (COVID) lockdowns) raises complex questions about the use of novel technological components, which may or may not be ultimately adequate for the task for which they are used. The question whether we can trust the technical infrastructures the public sector uses when providing public services is a central concern in an age where trust in government is declining: If the government’s artificial intelligence system that detects welfare fraud fails, the public’s confidence in the government is ultimately hit. In this paper, we provide a critical assessment of how the use of potentially untrustworthy (private) technological systems including blockchain-based systems in the public sector may affect trust in government. We then propose several policy options to protect the trust in government even if some of their technological components prove fundamentally untrustworthy.
Ferrari, V.
The platformisation of digital payments: The fabrication of consumer interest in the EU FinTech agenda Journal Article
In: Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 45, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {The platformisation of digital payments: The fabrication of consumer interest in the EU FinTech agenda},
author = {Ferrari, V.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/computerlawsecurityreview_2022/},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105687},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-05-19},
journal = { Computer Law \& Security Review},
volume = {45},
abstract = {This paper investigates, through a qualitative analysis of official documents, how certain imaginaries about technology filter into EU policymaking, allowing or accelerating the transformation of payment infrastructures into the platform economy.
One of the ways in which socio-technical imaginaries filter into policymaking is, it turns out, by informing an image of the consumer which serves to justify measures for the realization of a desired future. In particular, the documents offer a view of the consumer as an actor that is empowered by digitisation. The thesis of this paper is that this view of the consumer is partial: the rhetoric of consumer technological empowerment outweighs and conceals much needed considerations about the vulnerability of consumers vis-a-vis data-intensive payment technologies. Ultimately, the fault lies with the future imaginaries upon which such image is grounded. The vision of the digital payment infrastructure portrayed in the documents is in fact problematic for two reasons. First, the technologies that are portraited as desirable are chosen based on industry interests and trends rather than considerations of benefits and risks that these technologies entail. Secondly, the assumption that a liberalized market will offer more and better choices is flawed, as platformisation entails risks of monopolization and abuses of market power. We suggest that policymakers in this domain should be more critical of the risks entailed by platformisation, and open their imagination to alternative technological futures.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This paper investigates, through a qualitative analysis of official documents, how certain imaginaries about technology filter into EU policymaking, allowing or accelerating the transformation of payment infrastructures into the platform economy.
One of the ways in which socio-technical imaginaries filter into policymaking is, it turns out, by informing an image of the consumer which serves to justify measures for the realization of a desired future. In particular, the documents offer a view of the consumer as an actor that is empowered by digitisation. The thesis of this paper is that this view of the consumer is partial: the rhetoric of consumer technological empowerment outweighs and conceals much needed considerations about the vulnerability of consumers vis-a-vis data-intensive payment technologies. Ultimately, the fault lies with the future imaginaries upon which such image is grounded. The vision of the digital payment infrastructure portrayed in the documents is in fact problematic for two reasons. First, the technologies that are portraited as desirable are chosen based on industry interests and trends rather than considerations of benefits and risks that these technologies entail. Secondly, the assumption that a liberalized market will offer more and better choices is flawed, as platformisation entails risks of monopolization and abuses of market power. We suggest that policymakers in this domain should be more critical of the risks entailed by platformisation, and open their imagination to alternative technological futures.
One of the ways in which socio-technical imaginaries filter into policymaking is, it turns out, by informing an image of the consumer which serves to justify measures for the realization of a desired future. In particular, the documents offer a view of the consumer as an actor that is empowered by digitisation. The thesis of this paper is that this view of the consumer is partial: the rhetoric of consumer technological empowerment outweighs and conceals much needed considerations about the vulnerability of consumers vis-a-vis data-intensive payment technologies. Ultimately, the fault lies with the future imaginaries upon which such image is grounded. The vision of the digital payment infrastructure portrayed in the documents is in fact problematic for two reasons. First, the technologies that are portraited as desirable are chosen based on industry interests and trends rather than considerations of benefits and risks that these technologies entail. Secondly, the assumption that a liberalized market will offer more and better choices is flawed, as platformisation entails risks of monopolization and abuses of market power. We suggest that policymakers in this domain should be more critical of the risks entailed by platformisation, and open their imagination to alternative technological futures.
Quintais, J.
Between Filters and Fundamental Rights: How the Court of Justice saved Article 17 in C-401/19 - Poland v. Parliament and Council Journal Article
In: Verfassungsblog, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {Between Filters and Fundamental Rights: How the Court of Justice saved Article 17 in C-401/19 - Poland v. Parliament and Council},
author = {Quintais, J.},
url = {https://verfassungsblog.de/filters-poland/?s=09},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-05-16},
journal = {Verfassungsblog},
abstract = {On 26 April 2022, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU or Court) delivered its much awaited judgement in Case C-401/19 \textendash Poland v Parliament and Council. The case focuses on the validity of Article 17 of the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive (CDSMD) in light of fundamental rights. The judgment marks the climax of a turbulent journey in the area of copyright law, with potential implications for the future of platform regulation and content moderation in EU law.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
On 26 April 2022, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU or Court) delivered its much awaited judgement in Case C-401/19 – Poland v Parliament and Council. The case focuses on the validity of Article 17 of the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive (CDSMD) in light of fundamental rights. The judgment marks the climax of a turbulent journey in the area of copyright law, with potential implications for the future of platform regulation and content moderation in EU law.
E., Derclaye; van Eechoud, M.; Husovec, M.; Senftleben, M.
Opinion of the European Copyright Society on selected aspects of the proposed Data Act Journal Article
In: Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {Opinion of the European Copyright Society on selected aspects of the proposed Data Act},
author = {Derclaye E. and van Eechoud, M. and Husovec, M. and Senftleben, M.},
url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/05/16/opinion-of-the-european-copyright-society-on-selected-aspects-of-the-proposed-data-act/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-05-16},
journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Hugenholtz, P.
Groundhog Day in Geneva: The WIPO Broadcasting Treaty is on the Agenda Once Again Working paper
2022, (Draft paper prepared for American University International Law Review Symposium on the Right to Research in International Copyright Law, April 22, 2022).
@workingpaper{nokey,
title = {Groundhog Day in Geneva: The WIPO Broadcasting Treaty is on the Agenda Once Again},
author = {Hugenholtz, P.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/the-wipo-broadcasting-treaty-revisited/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-05-06},
note = {Draft paper prepared for American University International Law Review Symposium on the Right
to Research in International Copyright Law, April 22, 2022},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {workingpaper}
}
Keller, P.; Reda, F.; Quintais, J.; Giorello, M.
Video recording of the COMMUNIA Salon on the CJEU decision on Article 17 (Case C-401/19) Presentation
04.05.2022.
@misc{nokey,
title = {Video recording of the COMMUNIA Salon on the CJEU decision on Article 17 (Case C-401/19)},
author = {Keller, P. and Reda, F. and Quintais, J. and Giorello, M.},
url = {https://www.communia-association.org/2022/05/04/video-recording-of-the-communia-salon-on-the-cjeu-decision-on-article-17/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-05-04},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {presentation}
}
Chocarro, S.; Harrison, J.; McGonagle, T.; Parmar, S.; Torsner, S.
Closing the normative gap: What ten years of Human Rights Council Resolutions tell us about its approach to the safety of journalists Technical Report
2022, (Working paper, the seventh Academic Conference on the Safety of Journalists, jointly organised by the University of the Republic and UNESCO, World Press Freedom Day in Punta del Este, Uruguay).
@techreport{nokey,
title = {Closing the normative gap: What ten years of Human Rights Council Resolutions tell us about its approach to the safety of journalists },
author = {Chocarro, S. and Harrison,J. and McGonagle, T. and Parmar, S. and Torsner, S. },
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/nl/closing-the-normative-gap/
https://www.article19.org/resources/world-press-freedom-day-journalism-under-siege/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-05-03},
urldate = {2022-05-03},
abstract = {In the last ten years, there have been high levels of development of normative work within the United Nations (UN) system on the issue of the safety of journalists. Since the approval of the UN Plan of Action on the Safety of Journalists and the Issue of Impunity in 2012, the first ever UN strategy on this matter, and the subsequent first Human Rights Council (HRC) Resolution on the safety of journalists that same year, fifteen resolutions have been adopted by the principal UN Charter-based bodies, namely the Security Council, the General Assembly and the HRC, and also UNESCO.
The HRC resolutions, which have been adopted on a biennial basis, have proven to be the most progressive in addressing the safety of journalists from a human rights-based perspective. However, the main challenge remains their effective implementation. How have these resolutions evolved and what do they reveal about how the issue of the safety of journalists is addressed by the HRC? What are the shortcomings and gaps in the protection of the safety of journalists offered by this set of resolutions?
To answer these questions, this paper first undertakes a qualitative document analysis of HRC resolutions. It then analyzes the development of these resolutions from a humanrights perspective. Finally, based on this analysis, it identifies the normative gaps that should be addressed in order to properly respond to the most pressing challenges to the safety of journalists in the years to come.
},
note = {Working paper, the seventh Academic Conference on the Safety of Journalists, jointly organised by the University of the Republic and UNESCO, World Press Freedom Day in Punta del Este, Uruguay},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
In the last ten years, there have been high levels of development of normative work within the United Nations (UN) system on the issue of the safety of journalists. Since the approval of the UN Plan of Action on the Safety of Journalists and the Issue of Impunity in 2012, the first ever UN strategy on this matter, and the subsequent first Human Rights Council (HRC) Resolution on the safety of journalists that same year, fifteen resolutions have been adopted by the principal UN Charter-based bodies, namely the Security Council, the General Assembly and the HRC, and also UNESCO.
The HRC resolutions, which have been adopted on a biennial basis, have proven to be the most progressive in addressing the safety of journalists from a human rights-based perspective. However, the main challenge remains their effective implementation. How have these resolutions evolved and what do they reveal about how the issue of the safety of journalists is addressed by the HRC? What are the shortcomings and gaps in the protection of the safety of journalists offered by this set of resolutions?
To answer these questions, this paper first undertakes a qualitative document analysis of HRC resolutions. It then analyzes the development of these resolutions from a humanrights perspective. Finally, based on this analysis, it identifies the normative gaps that should be addressed in order to properly respond to the most pressing challenges to the safety of journalists in the years to come.
The HRC resolutions, which have been adopted on a biennial basis, have proven to be the most progressive in addressing the safety of journalists from a human rights-based perspective. However, the main challenge remains their effective implementation. How have these resolutions evolved and what do they reveal about how the issue of the safety of journalists is addressed by the HRC? What are the shortcomings and gaps in the protection of the safety of journalists offered by this set of resolutions?
To answer these questions, this paper first undertakes a qualitative document analysis of HRC resolutions. It then analyzes the development of these resolutions from a humanrights perspective. Finally, based on this analysis, it identifies the normative gaps that should be addressed in order to properly respond to the most pressing challenges to the safety of journalists in the years to come.
Quintais, J.
Article 17 survives, but freedom of expression safeguards are key: C-401/19 – Poland v Parliament and Council Journal Article
In: Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {Article 17 survives, but freedom of expression safeguards are key: C-401/19 \textendash Poland v Parliament and Council},
author = {Quintais, J.},
url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/04/26/article-17-survives-but-freedom-of-expression-safeguards-are-key-c-401-19-poland-v-parliament-and-council/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-05-02},
urldate = {2022-05-02},
journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Bulayenko, O.; Poort, J.; Quintais, J.; Gervais, D. J.
AI Music Outputs: Challenges to the Copyright Legal Framework – Part II Journal Article
In: Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {AI Music Outputs: Challenges to the Copyright Legal Framework \textendash Part II},
author = {Bulayenko, O. and Poort, J. and Quintais, J. and Gervais, D.J.},
url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/04/25/ai-music-outputs-challenges-to-the-copyright-legal-framework-part-ii/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-05-02},
journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Reda, F.; Keller, P.
CJEU upholds Article 17, but not in the form (most) Member States imagined Journal Article
In: Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {CJEU upholds Article 17, but not in the form (most) Member States imagined},
author = {Reda, F. and Keller, P.},
url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/04/28/cjeu-upholds-article-17-but-not-in-the-form-most-member-states-imagined/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-04-28},
journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Bulayenko, O.; Quintais, J.; Poort, J.; Gervais, D. J.
AI Music Outputs: Challenges to the Copyright Legal Framework – Part I Journal Article
In: Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {AI Music Outputs: Challenges to the Copyright Legal Framework \textendash Part I},
author = {Bulayenko, O. and Quintais, J. and Poort, J. and Gervais, D.J.},
url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/04/22/ai-music-outputs-challenges-to-the-copyright-legal-framework-part-i/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-04-22},
journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Hugenholtz, P.
Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie van de EU 8 september 2020 (Recorded Artists Actors Performers / Phonographic Performance (Ireland)) Journal Article
In: Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, iss. 15, no. 126, pp. 2384-2386, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie van de EU 8 september 2020 (Recorded Artists Actors Performers / Phonographic Performance (Ireland))},
author = {Hugenholtz, P.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/annotatie_nj_2022_126/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-04-19},
journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie},
number = {126},
issue = {15},
pages = {2384-2386},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Senftleben, M.
Robustness Check: Evaluating and Strengthening Artistic Use Defences in EU Trademark Law Journal Article
In: IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law , vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 567-603, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {Robustness Check: Evaluating and Strengthening Artistic Use Defences in EU Trademark Law},
author = {Senftleben, M.},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01182-x},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-04-12},
urldate = {2022-04-12},
journal = {IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law },
volume = {53},
number = {4},
pages = {567-603},
abstract = {The 2015 EU trademark law reform introduced a peculiar rule for reconciling trademark rights with freedom of artistic expression. According to Recital 21 EUTMR and Recital 27 TMD, artistic use can be deemed fair as long as the artist ensures compliance with “honest practices in industrial and commercial matters”. The honest practices proviso forges a link with the provisions on limitations of trademark rights. Article 14(1) EUTMR and Art. 14(1) TMD exempt from the control of trademark proprietors several types of use that can allow for artistic use. All these limitations, however, apply only when the use satisfies the test of honest practices. Confirming the obligation to comply with honest practices in industrial and commercial matters, the fairness rule of Recital 21 EUTMR and Recital 27 TMD turns out to be a double-edged sword. Instead of readily immunizing artistic use against trademark claims, it obliges artists to rely on limitations of trademark rights and furnish corresponding proof. Moreover, artists are expected to align their artistic activity with behavioural standards in the field of industry and commerce \textendash a realm that is alien to the artistic community. Evidently, this approach endangers artistic autonomy. To avoid detrimental effects on artistic expression, it is advisable to strengthen the position of artists and develop a legal solution that resembles the measures taken in Art. 9(3)(f) EUTMR and Art. 10(3)(f) TMD with regard to freedom of commercial expression. Drawing inspiration from cultural sciences and case law on both sides of the Atlantic, the analysis explores avenues for achieving this goal.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The 2015 EU trademark law reform introduced a peculiar rule for reconciling trademark rights with freedom of artistic expression. According to Recital 21 EUTMR and Recital 27 TMD, artistic use can be deemed fair as long as the artist ensures compliance with “honest practices in industrial and commercial matters”. The honest practices proviso forges a link with the provisions on limitations of trademark rights. Article 14(1) EUTMR and Art. 14(1) TMD exempt from the control of trademark proprietors several types of use that can allow for artistic use. All these limitations, however, apply only when the use satisfies the test of honest practices. Confirming the obligation to comply with honest practices in industrial and commercial matters, the fairness rule of Recital 21 EUTMR and Recital 27 TMD turns out to be a double-edged sword. Instead of readily immunizing artistic use against trademark claims, it obliges artists to rely on limitations of trademark rights and furnish corresponding proof. Moreover, artists are expected to align their artistic activity with behavioural standards in the field of industry and commerce – a realm that is alien to the artistic community. Evidently, this approach endangers artistic autonomy. To avoid detrimental effects on artistic expression, it is advisable to strengthen the position of artists and develop a legal solution that resembles the measures taken in Art. 9(3)(f) EUTMR and Art. 10(3)(f) TMD with regard to freedom of commercial expression. Drawing inspiration from cultural sciences and case law on both sides of the Atlantic, the analysis explores avenues for achieving this goal.
Senftleben, M.; Margoni, T.; Antal, D.; Bodó, B.; van Gompel, S.; Handke, C. W.; Kretschmer, M.; Poort, J.; Quintais, J.; Schwemer, S.
In: JIPITEC, vol. 13, iss. 1, pp. 67-86, 2022.
@article{Senftleben2021,
title = {Ensuring the Visibility and Accessibility of European Creative Content on the World Market: The Need for Copyright Data Improvement in the Light of New Technologies},
author = {Senftleben, M. and Margoni, T. and Antal, D. and Bod\'{o}, B. and van Gompel, S. and Handke, C.W. and Kretschmer, M. and Poort, J. and Quintais, J. and Schwemer, S.},
url = {https://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-13-1-2022/5515
https://www.ivir.nl/jipitec_2022/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-04-12},
urldate = {2021-03-23},
journal = {JIPITEC},
volume = {13},
issue = {1},
pages = {67-86},
abstract = {In the European Strategy for Data, the European Commission highlighted the EU’s ambition to acquire a leading role in the data economy. At the same time, the Commission conceded that the EU would have to increase its pools of quality data available for use and re-use. In the creative industries, this need for enhanced data quality and interoperability is particularly strong. Without data improvement, unprecedented opportunities for monetising the wide variety of EU creative and making this content available for new technologies, such as artificial intelligence training systems, will most probably be lost. The problem has a worldwide dimension. While the US have already taken steps to provide an integrated data space for music as of 1 January 2021, the EU is facing major obstacles not only in the field of music but also in other creative industry sectors. Weighing costs and benefits, there can be little doubt that new data improvement initiatives and sufficient investment in a better copyright data infrastructure should play a central role in EU copyright policy. A trade-off between data harmonisation and interoperability on the one hand, and transparency and accountability of content recommender systems on the other, could pave the way for successful new initiatives.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
In the European Strategy for Data, the European Commission highlighted the EU’s ambition to acquire a leading role in the data economy. At the same time, the Commission conceded that the EU would have to increase its pools of quality data available for use and re-use. In the creative industries, this need for enhanced data quality and interoperability is particularly strong. Without data improvement, unprecedented opportunities for monetising the wide variety of EU creative and making this content available for new technologies, such as artificial intelligence training systems, will most probably be lost. The problem has a worldwide dimension. While the US have already taken steps to provide an integrated data space for music as of 1 January 2021, the EU is facing major obstacles not only in the field of music but also in other creative industry sectors. Weighing costs and benefits, there can be little doubt that new data improvement initiatives and sufficient investment in a better copyright data infrastructure should play a central role in EU copyright policy. A trade-off between data harmonisation and interoperability on the one hand, and transparency and accountability of content recommender systems on the other, could pave the way for successful new initiatives.
Alberdingk Thijm, Chr. A.
Knock Knock Who's There? Tussenpersonen, persoonsgegevens en de kunst van het juiste evenwicht Journal Article
In: Ars Aequi, iss. april, pp. 279-288, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {Knock Knock Who's There? Tussenpersonen, persoonsgegevens en de kunst van het juiste evenwicht},
author = {Alberdingk Thijm, Chr. A.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/nl/aa_2022/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-04-08},
journal = {Ars Aequi},
issue = {april},
pages = {279-288},
abstract = {Wat te doen als je op Twitter door een anoniem profiel voor rotte vis wordt uitgemaakt? Het Nederlandse recht biedt verschillende mogelijkheden om identificerende gegevens te verkrijgen van internettussenpersonen. Maar hoe wordt de afweging met de bescherming van de persoonsgegevens van de anonymus gemaakt? Hoe verhoudt het recht op een doeltreffende voorziening in rechte zich tot het gegevensbeschermingsrecht? Het Hof van Justitie schrijft voor dat bij botsende
fundamentele rechten het ‘juiste evenwicht’ moet worden gevonden. Dat blijkt de Nederlandse rechter nog niet zo eenvoudig te vinden, zo wordt duidelijk bij de bespreking van het Dutch FilmWorks-arrest in dit artikel.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Wat te doen als je op Twitter door een anoniem profiel voor rotte vis wordt uitgemaakt? Het Nederlandse recht biedt verschillende mogelijkheden om identificerende gegevens te verkrijgen van internettussenpersonen. Maar hoe wordt de afweging met de bescherming van de persoonsgegevens van de anonymus gemaakt? Hoe verhoudt het recht op een doeltreffende voorziening in rechte zich tot het gegevensbeschermingsrecht? Het Hof van Justitie schrijft voor dat bij botsende
fundamentele rechten het ‘juiste evenwicht’ moet worden gevonden. Dat blijkt de Nederlandse rechter nog niet zo eenvoudig te vinden, zo wordt duidelijk bij de bespreking van het Dutch FilmWorks-arrest in dit artikel.
fundamentele rechten het ‘juiste evenwicht’ moet worden gevonden. Dat blijkt de Nederlandse rechter nog niet zo eenvoudig te vinden, zo wordt duidelijk bij de bespreking van het Dutch FilmWorks-arrest in dit artikel.
Poort, J.
De CoronaMelder door een economische lens Journal Article
In: TPEdigitaal, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 48-60, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {De CoronaMelder door een economische lens},
author = {Poort, J.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/tpedigitaal_2022_2/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-04-08},
journal = {TPEdigitaal},
volume = {16},
issue = {2},
pages = {48-60},
abstract = {In oktober 2020 lanceerde Nederland de CoronaMelder-app voor geautomatiseerd onderzoek naar blootstelling aan het Covid-19 virus. Een tentatieve analyse van de maatschappelijke kosten en baten van de app suggereert dat de baten in evenwicht zijn met de kosten, zelfs als alleen wordt gekeken naar de bespaarde levensjaren door het voorkomen van sterfgevallen. Het percentage van de positieve tests dat door de app teweeg wordt gebracht, is de sleutel tot de positieve bijdrage ervan aan de maatschappelijke welvaart. Dit percentage is aanzienlijk lager voor de app dan voor handmatig contactonderzoek door de GGD, wat erop wijst dat de app effici\"{e}nt kan zijn als aanvulling op handmatig contactonderzoek, maar niet als vervanging daarvan.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
In oktober 2020 lanceerde Nederland de CoronaMelder-app voor geautomatiseerd onderzoek naar blootstelling aan het Covid-19 virus. Een tentatieve analyse van de maatschappelijke kosten en baten van de app suggereert dat de baten in evenwicht zijn met de kosten, zelfs als alleen wordt gekeken naar de bespaarde levensjaren door het voorkomen van sterfgevallen. Het percentage van de positieve tests dat door de app teweeg wordt gebracht, is de sleutel tot de positieve bijdrage ervan aan de maatschappelijke welvaart. Dit percentage is aanzienlijk lager voor de app dan voor handmatig contactonderzoek door de GGD, wat erop wijst dat de app efficiënt kan zijn als aanvulling op handmatig contactonderzoek, maar niet als vervanging daarvan.
Quintais, J.; Trapova, A.
EU copyright law round up – first trimester of 2022 Journal Article
In: Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {EU copyright law round up \textendash first trimester of 2022},
author = {Quintais, J. and Trapova, A.},
url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/04/06/eu-copyright-law-round-up-first-trimester-of-2022/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-04-07},
journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Bulayenko, O.; Quintais, J.; Gervais, D. J.; Poort, J.
AI Music Outputs: Challenges to the Copyright Legal Framework Technical Report
2022, (reCreating Europe report).
@techreport{nokey,
title = {AI Music Outputs: Challenges to the Copyright Legal Framework},
author = {Bulayenko, O. and Quintais, J. and Gervais, D.J. and Poort, J.},
url = {https://zenodo.org/record/6405796#.Yk62cchBy5e
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4072806},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-04-07},
urldate = {2022-04-07},
abstract = {This report examines the application of EU copyright and related rights law to outputs generated by or with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) systems, tools or techniques (AI outputs), with a focus on outputs in the musical domain. The Report examines the question: How can and should EU copyright and related rights law protect AI musical outputs? The interdisciplinary (legal and empirical) research involves: (i) analyzing of the protection of AI outputs under EU copyright and related rights law; (ii) examining the attribution of authorship and ownership to (natural and legal) persons involved in the creation or production of AI outputs; (iii) proposing interpretative guidelines and policy recommendations on increasing legal certainty regarding the protection, authorship, and ownership of copyright and related rights over AI outputs, especially music outputs.},
note = {reCreating Europe report},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
This report examines the application of EU copyright and related rights law to outputs generated by or with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) systems, tools or techniques (AI outputs), with a focus on outputs in the musical domain. The Report examines the question: How can and should EU copyright and related rights law protect AI musical outputs? The interdisciplinary (legal and empirical) research involves: (i) analyzing of the protection of AI outputs under EU copyright and related rights law; (ii) examining the attribution of authorship and ownership to (natural and legal) persons involved in the creation or production of AI outputs; (iii) proposing interpretative guidelines and policy recommendations on increasing legal certainty regarding the protection, authorship, and ownership of copyright and related rights over AI outputs, especially music outputs.
Hins, A.
Grondrechten voor de vijand Journal Article
In: De Hofvijver, vol. 12, iss. 129, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {Grondrechten voor de vijand},
author = {Hins, A.},
url = {https://www.montesquieu-instituut.nl/id/vlrjjfj3ptw8/nieuws/grondrechthttps://www.ivir.nl/hofvijver-28-maart-2022-opinie-grondrechten-voor-de-vijand/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-03-28},
journal = {De Hofvijver},
volume = {12},
issue = {129},
abstract = {Op 1 maart 2022 besloot de Raad van de Europese Unie tot een algemeen verbod op het doorgeven van de Russische propagandazenders RT (Russia Today) en Sputnik. In deze opinie wordt het standpunt ingenomen dat desinformatie moet worden bestreden, maar dat het middel van censuur erger is dan de kwaal.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Op 1 maart 2022 besloot de Raad van de Europese Unie tot een algemeen verbod op het doorgeven van de Russische propagandazenders RT (Russia Today) en Sputnik. In deze opinie wordt het standpunt ingenomen dat desinformatie moet worden bestreden, maar dat het middel van censuur erger is dan de kwaal.
Irion, K.
The General Data Protection Regulation though the lens of digital sovereignty Conference
EU CYBER DIRECT RESEARCH SEMINAR, 2022.
@conference{Irion2022,
title = {The General Data Protection Regulation though the lens of digital sovereignty},
author = {Irion, K.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/irion-gdpr-and-digital-sovereignty-11mar22/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-03-28},
urldate = {2022-03-28},
booktitle = {EU CYBER DIRECT RESEARCH SEMINAR},
abstract = {This short contribution will present and discuss the European Union’s (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) through the lens of ‘digital sovereignty. When high-ranking representatives of EU institutions endorsed digital sovereignty this has been interpreted as a signpost for a new-found assertiveness in EU digital policy. However, digital sovereignty is conceptually fuzzy and is used to animate a wide spectrum of geopolitical, normative, and industrial ambitions. In the context of the GDPR it makes sense to operationalize digital sovereignty as the ability of rules to assert authority in a global and interdependent digital ecosystem. Conceived this way, I will reflect on how the GDPR wields transnational capacity by design in the form of safeguards against inbound and outbound circumvention.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {conference}
}
This short contribution will present and discuss the European Union’s (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) through the lens of ‘digital sovereignty. When high-ranking representatives of EU institutions endorsed digital sovereignty this has been interpreted as a signpost for a new-found assertiveness in EU digital policy. However, digital sovereignty is conceptually fuzzy and is used to animate a wide spectrum of geopolitical, normative, and industrial ambitions. In the context of the GDPR it makes sense to operationalize digital sovereignty as the ability of rules to assert authority in a global and interdependent digital ecosystem. Conceived this way, I will reflect on how the GDPR wields transnational capacity by design in the form of safeguards against inbound and outbound circumvention.
Rucz, M.; Irion, K.; Senftleben, M.
Contribution to the public consultation on the European Media Freedom Act Journal Article
In: 2022.
@article{Rucz2022b,
title = {Contribution to the public consultation on the European Media Freedom Act},
author = {Rucz, M. and Irion, K. and Senftleben, M.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/position-paper-european-media-freedom-act-consultation-2/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-03-28},
urldate = {2022-03-28},
abstract = {The announcement of the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA) has provided an important impulse for the development of new legal rules seeking to safeguard and support a free and pluralistic media environment in the European Union (EU). As indicated by Commissioners Vv{e}ra Jourov and Thierry Breton, the initiative is set to address a wide range of persisting challenges faced by European media outlets, including political and economic pressures, unjustified interference with editorial independence, failing business models supporting journalism and issues surrounding media pluralism. Considering the broad spectrum of concerns and the centrality of a pluralist media environment for the health of democracies, the European Commission’s commitment to the EMFA is commendable and urgent. With this submission, we would like to take the opportunity to respond to the European Commission’s public consultation on the EMFA.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The announcement of the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA) has provided an important impulse for the development of new legal rules seeking to safeguard and support a free and pluralistic media environment in the European Union (EU). As indicated by Commissioners Věra Jourov and Thierry Breton, the initiative is set to address a wide range of persisting challenges faced by European media outlets, including political and economic pressures, unjustified interference with editorial independence, failing business models supporting journalism and issues surrounding media pluralism. Considering the broad spectrum of concerns and the centrality of a pluralist media environment for the health of democracies, the European Commission’s commitment to the EMFA is commendable and urgent. With this submission, we would like to take the opportunity to respond to the European Commission’s public consultation on the EMFA.
Poort, J.; Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.
Online prijsdiscriminatie: heeft iedereen zijn prijs? Presentation
17.03.2022, (presentatie Amsterdamse Academische Club).
@misc{nokey,
title = {Online prijsdiscriminatie: heeft iedereen zijn prijs?},
author = {Poort, J. and Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/prijsdiscriminatie-aac/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-03-17},
note = {presentatie Amsterdamse Academische Club},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {presentation}
}
Hins, A.
Annotatie bij EHRM 7 december 2021 (Standard Verlagsgesellschaft / Oostenrijk) Journal Article
In: Jurisprudentie Bescherming Persoonsgegevens, iss. 1, no. 1, pp. 19-23, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 7 december 2021 (Standard Verlagsgesellschaft / Oostenrijk)},
author = {Hins, A.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/annotatie_jbp_2022_1/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-03-15},
journal = {Jurisprudentie Bescherming Persoonsgegevens},
number = {1},
issue = {1},
pages = {19-23},
abstract = {Standard Verlagsgesellschaft geeft in Oostenrijk een dagblad uit, dat ook online wordt gepubliceerd. Onder de redactionele artikelen kunnen geregistreerde lezers hun eigen commentaar plaatsen, desgewenst onder een schuilnaam. In de casus hadden drie lezers onder schuilnaam scherpe afkeuring uitgesproken over het gedrag van twee politici. Bij de nationale rechter vorderden de twee politici afgifte van de namen, adressen en woonplaatsen van de auteurs. De Oostenrijkse rechter wees de eis toe, maar het EHRM oordeelt anders. Weliswaar is het recht op bronbescherming niet van toepassing, maar de persvrijheid krachtens artikel 10 EVRM is toch geschonden.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Standard Verlagsgesellschaft geeft in Oostenrijk een dagblad uit, dat ook online wordt gepubliceerd. Onder de redactionele artikelen kunnen geregistreerde lezers hun eigen commentaar plaatsen, desgewenst onder een schuilnaam. In de casus hadden drie lezers onder schuilnaam scherpe afkeuring uitgesproken over het gedrag van twee politici. Bij de nationale rechter vorderden de twee politici afgifte van de namen, adressen en woonplaatsen van de auteurs. De Oostenrijkse rechter wees de eis toe, maar het EHRM oordeelt anders. Weliswaar is het recht op bronbescherming niet van toepassing, maar de persvrijheid krachtens artikel 10 EVRM is toch geschonden.
Peukert, A.; Husovec, M.; Kretschmer, M.; Mezei, P.; Quintais, J.
European Copyright Society – Comment on Copyright and the Digital Services Act Proposal Journal Article
In: IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law , vol. 53, iss. 3, pp. 358-376, 2022, (Opinion).
@article{nokey,
title = {European Copyright Society \textendash Comment on Copyright and the Digital Services Act Proposal},
author = {Peukert, A. and Husovec, M. and Kretschmer, M. and Mezei, P. and Quintais, J.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/iic_2022/},
doi = {10.1007/s40319-022-01154-1},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-03-14},
urldate = {2022-03-14},
journal = {IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law },
volume = {53},
issue = {3},
pages = {358-376},
note = {Opinion},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Quintais, J.; Schwemer, S.
The Interplay between the Digital Services Act and Sector Regulation: How Special is Copyright? Journal Article
In: European Journal of Risk Regulation, vol. 13, iss. 2, pp. 191-217, 2022.
@article{Quintais2021e,
title = {The Interplay between the Digital Services Act and Sector Regulation: How Special is Copyright?},
author = {Quintais, J. and Schwemer, S. },
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/ejrr_2022/},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2022.1},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-03-14},
urldate = {2022-03-14},
journal = {European Journal of Risk Regulation},
volume = {13},
issue = {2},
pages = {191-217},
abstract = {On 15 December 2020, the European Commission published its proposal for a Regulation on a Single Market for Digital Services (Digital Services Act). It carries out a regulatory overhaul of the 21-year- old horizontal rules on intermediary liability in the Directive and introduces new due diligence obligations for intermediary services.
Our analysis illuminates an important point that has so far received little attention: how would the Digital Services Act’s rules interact with existing sector-specific lex specialis rules? In this paper, we look specifically at the intersection of the Digital Services Act with the regime for online content sharing service providers (OCSSPs) set forth in art. 17 of Directive (EU) 2019/790 on copyright in the Digital Single Market (CDSM Directive). At first glance, these regimes do not appear to overlap as the rules on copyright are lex specialis to the Digital Services Act. A closer look shows a more complex and nuanced picture. Our analysis concludes that the DSA will apply to OCSSPs insofar as it contains rules that regulate matters not covered by art. 17 CDSM Directive, as well as specific rules on matters where art. 17 leaves margin of discretion to Member States. This includes, to varying degrees, rules in the DSA relating to the liability of intermediary providers and to due diligence obligations for online platforms of different sizes. Importantly, we consider that such rules apply even where art. 17 CDSM Directive contains specific (but less precise) regulation on the matter.
From a normative perspective, this might be a desirable outcome, to the extent that the DSA aims to establish “uniform rules for a safe, predictable and trusted online environment, where fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter are effectively protected”. Based on our analysis, we suggest a number of clarifications that might be help achieve that goal. },
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
On 15 December 2020, the European Commission published its proposal for a Regulation on a Single Market for Digital Services (Digital Services Act). It carries out a regulatory overhaul of the 21-year- old horizontal rules on intermediary liability in the Directive and introduces new due diligence obligations for intermediary services.
Our analysis illuminates an important point that has so far received little attention: how would the Digital Services Act’s rules interact with existing sector-specific lex specialis rules? In this paper, we look specifically at the intersection of the Digital Services Act with the regime for online content sharing service providers (OCSSPs) set forth in art. 17 of Directive (EU) 2019/790 on copyright in the Digital Single Market (CDSM Directive). At first glance, these regimes do not appear to overlap as the rules on copyright are lex specialis to the Digital Services Act. A closer look shows a more complex and nuanced picture. Our analysis concludes that the DSA will apply to OCSSPs insofar as it contains rules that regulate matters not covered by art. 17 CDSM Directive, as well as specific rules on matters where art. 17 leaves margin of discretion to Member States. This includes, to varying degrees, rules in the DSA relating to the liability of intermediary providers and to due diligence obligations for online platforms of different sizes. Importantly, we consider that such rules apply even where art. 17 CDSM Directive contains specific (but less precise) regulation on the matter.
From a normative perspective, this might be a desirable outcome, to the extent that the DSA aims to establish “uniform rules for a safe, predictable and trusted online environment, where fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter are effectively protected”. Based on our analysis, we suggest a number of clarifications that might be help achieve that goal.
Our analysis illuminates an important point that has so far received little attention: how would the Digital Services Act’s rules interact with existing sector-specific lex specialis rules? In this paper, we look specifically at the intersection of the Digital Services Act with the regime for online content sharing service providers (OCSSPs) set forth in art. 17 of Directive (EU) 2019/790 on copyright in the Digital Single Market (CDSM Directive). At first glance, these regimes do not appear to overlap as the rules on copyright are lex specialis to the Digital Services Act. A closer look shows a more complex and nuanced picture. Our analysis concludes that the DSA will apply to OCSSPs insofar as it contains rules that regulate matters not covered by art. 17 CDSM Directive, as well as specific rules on matters where art. 17 leaves margin of discretion to Member States. This includes, to varying degrees, rules in the DSA relating to the liability of intermediary providers and to due diligence obligations for online platforms of different sizes. Importantly, we consider that such rules apply even where art. 17 CDSM Directive contains specific (but less precise) regulation on the matter.
From a normative perspective, this might be a desirable outcome, to the extent that the DSA aims to establish “uniform rules for a safe, predictable and trusted online environment, where fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter are effectively protected”. Based on our analysis, we suggest a number of clarifications that might be help achieve that goal.
Keller, P.
A vanishing right? The Sui Generis Database Right and the proposed Data Act Journal Article
In: Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {A vanishing right? The Sui Generis Database Right and the proposed Data Act},
author = {Keller, P.},
url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/03/04/a-vanishing-right-the-sui-generis-database-right-and-the-proposed-data-act/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-03-10},
journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Yakovleva, S.; Drechsler, L.
In: 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {Contribution to the public consultation on the Guidelines 05/2021 on the Interplay between the application of Article 3 and the provisions on international transfers as per Chapter V of the GDPR},
author = {Yakovleva, S. and Drechsler, L.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/public_consultation_edpb_transfers_v8/
https://edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/documents/public-consultations/2021/guidelines-052021-interplay-between-application_en},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-03-10},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
van Eechoud, M.
Annotatie bij Rechtbank Midden-Nederland 22 december 2021 (VVZBI/KVK) Journal Article
In: Auteursrecht, iss. 1, pp. 71-72, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {Annotatie bij Rechtbank Midden-Nederland 22 december 2021 (VVZBI/KVK)},
author = {van Eechoud, M.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/annotatie_auteursrecht_2022_71/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-03-03},
journal = {Auteursrecht},
issue = {1},
pages = {71-72},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Quintais, J.; Angelopoulos, C.
Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie van de EU 22 juni 2021 Frank Peterson / Google & YouTube (C 682/18) & Elsevier / Cyando AG (C 683/18) Journal Article
In: Auteursrecht, iss. 1, no. 1, pp. 46-51, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie van de EU 22 juni 2021 Frank Peterson / Google \& YouTube (C 682/18) \& Elsevier / Cyando AG (C 683/18)},
author = {Quintais, J. and Angelopoulos, C.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/annotatie_auteursrecht_2022_1/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-03-03},
journal = {Auteursrecht},
number = {1},
issue = {1},
pages = {46-51},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
van Gompel, S.; Schumacher, L. D.; Senftleben, M.
Web harvesting: auteursrechtelijke implicaties en oplossingsrichtingen Journal Article
In: Auteursrecht, iss. 1, pp. 3-14, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {Web harvesting: auteursrechtelijke implicaties en oplossingsrichtingen},
author = {van Gompel, S. and Schumacher, L.D. and Senftleben, M.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/auteursrecht_2022_1/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-03-03},
journal = {Auteursrecht},
issue = {1},
pages = {3-14},
abstract = {‘Web harvesting’ is het proces waarbij een web crawler \textendash een gespecialiseerd computerprogramma \textendash wordt ingezet om websites en internetpagina’s op geautomatiseerde wijze te verzamelen en toe te voegen aan een webarchief. Nederlandse erfgoedinstellingen gebruiken deze techniek bijvoorbeeld om websites aan hun collecties toe te voegen die op het Nederlandse publiek zijn gericht (‘nationale domeincrawl’). Web harvesting kan ook beperkt zijn tot specifiek geselecteerde websites die met een bepaald onderwerp of gebeurtenis samenhangen (‘beredeneerde selectie’). In Nederland gebeurt web harvesting thans enkel nog op kleine schaal. Web crawling gaat namelijk gepaard met talloze reproductiehandelingen, waarvoor vanuit auteursrechtelijk perspectief toestemming kan zijn vereist. Voor het herhaaldelijk en systematisch harvesten van grote hoeveelheden materiaal op het web is het verkrijgen van individuele toestemming een schier onmogelijke taak. Daarnaast willen erfgoedinstellingen het geharveste materiaal ook op een of andere manier ontsluiten om het gebruik voor algemene zin \textendash toegang tot het digitale culturele erfgoed te bieden. Dit artikel onderzoekt tegen deze achtergrond, mede aan de hand van een rechtsvergelijking met het buitenland, welke oplossingsrichtingen er binnen het huidige auteursrechtelijke kader bestaan om web harvesting-activiteiten door erfgoedinstellingen op grotere schaal mogelijk te maken. Dit is nodig om gaten in de archivering van het online Nederlands erfgoed te voorkomen en het digitale culturele erfgoed voor het nageslacht te bewaren en beschikbaar te stellen. },
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
‘Web harvesting’ is het proces waarbij een web crawler – een gespecialiseerd computerprogramma – wordt ingezet om websites en internetpagina’s op geautomatiseerde wijze te verzamelen en toe te voegen aan een webarchief. Nederlandse erfgoedinstellingen gebruiken deze techniek bijvoorbeeld om websites aan hun collecties toe te voegen die op het Nederlandse publiek zijn gericht (‘nationale domeincrawl’). Web harvesting kan ook beperkt zijn tot specifiek geselecteerde websites die met een bepaald onderwerp of gebeurtenis samenhangen (‘beredeneerde selectie’). In Nederland gebeurt web harvesting thans enkel nog op kleine schaal. Web crawling gaat namelijk gepaard met talloze reproductiehandelingen, waarvoor vanuit auteursrechtelijk perspectief toestemming kan zijn vereist. Voor het herhaaldelijk en systematisch harvesten van grote hoeveelheden materiaal op het web is het verkrijgen van individuele toestemming een schier onmogelijke taak. Daarnaast willen erfgoedinstellingen het geharveste materiaal ook op een of andere manier ontsluiten om het gebruik voor algemene zin – toegang tot het digitale culturele erfgoed te bieden. Dit artikel onderzoekt tegen deze achtergrond, mede aan de hand van een rechtsvergelijking met het buitenland, welke oplossingsrichtingen er binnen het huidige auteursrechtelijke kader bestaan om web harvesting-activiteiten door erfgoedinstellingen op grotere schaal mogelijk te maken. Dit is nodig om gaten in de archivering van het online Nederlands erfgoed te voorkomen en het digitale culturele erfgoed voor het nageslacht te bewaren en beschikbaar te stellen.
van Eechoud, M.; Schumacher, L. D.
Data na de dood: Zwevend tussen contract en gegevensbescherming Journal Article
In: Nederlands Juristenblad (NJB), iss. 6, no. 355, pp. 396-405, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {Data na de dood: Zwevend tussen contract en gegevensbescherming},
author = {van Eechoud, M. and Schumacher, L.D.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/NJB_2022_355.pdf},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-02-14},
journal = {Nederlands Juristenblad (NJB)},
number = {355},
issue = {6},
pages = {396-405},
abstract = {Mensen zijn zich nog weinig bewust van wat de implicaties van overlijden zijn voor het digitale bezit dat ze nalaten, terwijl iedereen hier steeds meer van heeft. Opvattingen verschillen over de mate waarin erfgenamen toegang moeten krijgen; er is nog weinig bekend over (veranderende) maatschappelijke opvattingen daarover. Omdat digitale communicatie geregeerd wordt door standaardovereenkomsten met aanbieders van informatiediensten, wordt ook de positie van erfgenamen daar primair door bepaald. Tegelijkertijd hebben veel aanbieders nog geen doordacht ‘overlijdensbeleid’ en daarbij passende voorwaarden en tools. Het lijkt tijd dat de (Europese) wetgever daar wat aan gaat veranderen. Om op kortere termijn te zorgen voor meer rechtszekerheid, zou de Nederlandse wetgever in ieder geval enkele specifieke plichten en rechten uit de AVG van toepassing kunnen verklaren op de persoonsgegevens van overleden gebruikers van informatiediensten.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Mensen zijn zich nog weinig bewust van wat de implicaties van overlijden zijn voor het digitale bezit dat ze nalaten, terwijl iedereen hier steeds meer van heeft. Opvattingen verschillen over de mate waarin erfgenamen toegang moeten krijgen; er is nog weinig bekend over (veranderende) maatschappelijke opvattingen daarover. Omdat digitale communicatie geregeerd wordt door standaardovereenkomsten met aanbieders van informatiediensten, wordt ook de positie van erfgenamen daar primair door bepaald. Tegelijkertijd hebben veel aanbieders nog geen doordacht ‘overlijdensbeleid’ en daarbij passende voorwaarden en tools. Het lijkt tijd dat de (Europese) wetgever daar wat aan gaat veranderen. Om op kortere termijn te zorgen voor meer rechtszekerheid, zou de Nederlandse wetgever in ieder geval enkele specifieke plichten en rechten uit de AVG van toepassing kunnen verklaren op de persoonsgegevens van overleden gebruikers van informatiediensten.
Yakovleva, S.; van Hoboken, J.
The Algorithmic Learning Deficit: Artificial Intelligence, Data Protection and Trade Book Chapter
In: Big Data and Global Trade Law, Mira Burri (ed.) Cambridge University Press, 2021, Chapter 10, pp. 212-230, 2022.
@inbook{nokey,
title = {The Algorithmic Learning Deficit: Artificial Intelligence, Data Protection and Trade},
author = {Yakovleva, S. and van Hoboken, J.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/the-algorithmic-learning-deficit.pdf},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108919234.014},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-02-10},
urldate = {2022-02-10},
booktitle = {Big Data and Global Trade Law, Mira Burri (ed.) Cambridge University Press, 2021},
pages = {212-230},
chapter = {10},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Hugenholtz, P.
DJs are Phonogram Producers, says Dutch Supreme Court Journal Article
In: Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2022.
@article{nokey,
title = {DJs are Phonogram Producers, says Dutch Supreme Court},
author = {Hugenholtz, P.},
url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/01/31/djs-are-phonogram-producers-says-dutch-supreme-court/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-01-31},
journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}