{"id":29119,"date":"2026-03-03T10:52:39","date_gmt":"2026-03-03T08:52:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ivir.nl\/?post_type=vo_events&p=29119"},"modified":"2026-03-03T12:17:06","modified_gmt":"2026-03-03T10:17:06","slug":"ivir-lecture-series-27march2026","status":"publish","type":"vo_events","link":"https:\/\/www.ivir.nl\/nl\/agenda\/ivir-lecture-series-27march2026\/","title":{"rendered":"IViR Lecture Series: Does Information Law Suit Information Machines?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n

IViR is pleased to announce that<\/strong>
Prof. Nadya Purtova
will give a lecture entitled<\/strong>

Does Information Law Suit Information Machines?<\/a><\/mark><\/strong>

on Friday 27 March 2026<\/strong>
<\/p>\n<\/div>

\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Law regulates information and depends on understanding information. Yet, this understanding is not based on the scientific study of information. Law relies on the ordinary meaning of information: something which has meaning to a human. Information has impact when humans know and use it. This human-centric understanding, however, is unhelpful when law tackles algorithmic processes. Advanced algorithms draw meaning where humans see none and convert information to impact without humans, beyond human grasp. Data protection and discrimination law are just two legal areas that fall into the trap of regulating information without understanding it, unproductively targeting algorithmic processes based on notions of human cognitive interpretation. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

At the same time, human-centric understanding and nature of some information processes, such as expression, might be compromised if the legal heuristic of regulating information becomes too algorithm-focused. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A central question that should be resolved for information law now is what the difference is between how humans and algorithms deal with information, and when this difference should make a difference in law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nadya Purtova<\/strong> is a Professor of Law, Innovation, and Technology at Utrecht University\u2019s School of Law<\/mark><\/a>. She joined Utrecht University following previous positions at Tilburg Institute of Law, Technology and Society (TILT), and Groningen University, the Netherlands. Her research focuses on how to understand and tackle socio-technical change related to information technologies in areas including data protection law, data ownership, data law and (collective) governance. She was awarded a 2016 ERC Starting Grant and completed an ERC project that proposed how legal protection against information-related problems, including data protection law, should be reformed based on understanding of information and data in information studies and economics (INFO-LEG).

She is the author of Property rights in personal data: a European perspective (Kluwer Law International 2011, open access<\/mark><\/a>) and \u201cThe law of everything. Broad concept of personal data and future of EU data protection law\u201d<\/a>\u00a0<\/mark>(LIT, 2018). Her recent academic publications include \u201cAgainst data fixation\u201d<\/mark><\/a>\u00a0(with Bryce Newell, OA pre-print<\/mark><\/a>), \u201cCode as personal data: implications for data protection law and regulation of algorithms\u201d (2023, with Ronald Leenes), \u201cFrom knowing by name to targeting: the meaning of identification under the GDPR\u201d (2022) and \u201cData as an economic good, data as a commons, and data governance\u201d (2024, with Gijs van Maanen). Nadya holds a PhD (cum laude) from Tilburg University, MSc from Leiden University and LLM from Central European University.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n

Practical details:<\/strong>

Date:\u00a027 March 2026
Time:\u00a015:30 – 16:45 CET (Amsterdam)
Place:
\u2013\u00a0IViR Room, REC A5.24, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV Amsterdam.
\u2013 Online via Zoom (you will receive the Zoomlink via e-mail before the lecture).<\/strong>
See also the\u00a0flyer<\/mark><\/a>.<\/mark><\/mark><\/strong>

Please register below to sign up for this lecture.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n