@misc{,
title = {Het prinsesje onder de grondrechten},
author = {J.J.C. Kabel},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1725.pdf},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-02-16},
journal = {Privacy & Informatie},
number = {6},
pages = {215.},
note = {
Redactioneel.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@misc{,
title = {IE vincit omnia? Opsporing in de particuliere sector.},
author = {J.J.C. Kabel},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1724.pdf},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-02-16},
journal = {AMI},
number = {6},
pages = {176-180.},
abstract = {
Bevel aan Google tot afgifte ex. art. 28 lid 9 Aw van persoons- en adresgegevens van de houder van een Google Play account vanwege onrechtmatige verkoop van e-books. Voorwaarde dat de houder op grond van art. 40 Wbp verzet kan aantekenen tegen die afgifte bij de verantwoordelijke (Google). Grondrechtenconflict bescherming van eigendom, vrijheid van meningsuiting en privacy.
},
note = {
Annotatie bij Vzr. Rb. Den Haag 5 oktober 2015 en 6 november 2015 (Stichting Brein / Google).
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@misc{,
title = {Data protection anno 2014: How to restore trust? An introduction},
author = {H. Kranenborg and H. Hijmans},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1717.pdf},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-19},
note = {
In: Data protection anno 2014: How to restore trust? Contributions in honour of Peter Hustinx, European Data Protection Supervisor (2004-2014), H. Hijmans & H. Kranenborg (eds.), Cambridge: Intersentia 2014, p. 3-18.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@article{,
title = {Right to have links removed: Evidence of effective data protection},
author = {H. Hijmans},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1718.pdf},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-19},
journal = {Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law},
number = {3},
pages = {555-563.},
note = {
Case C-131/12 Google v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja Gonzalez, Judgment of 13 May 2014.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@misc{,
title = {On private persons monitoring the public space},
author = {H. Hijmans},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1719.pdf},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-19},
journal = {European Data Protection Law Review},
number = {2},
pages = {1-4.},
note = {
Case C-212/13, František Ryneš v Ú\v{r}ad pro ochranu osobních údajr{u}, Judgment of 11 December 2014, Opinion Advocate General Jääskinen of 10 July 2014.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@article{,
title = {Welcome to the Jungle: the Liability of Internet Intermediaries for Privacy Violations in Europe},
author = {van der Sloot, B.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1720.pdf},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-19},
journal = {JIPITEC},
number = {3},
pages = {211-228.},
abstract = {
In Europe, roughly three regimes apply to the liability of Internet intermediaries for privacy violations conducted by users through their network. These are: the e-Commerce Directive, which, under certain conditions, excludes them from liability; the Data Protection Directive, which imposes a number of duties and responsibilities on providers processing personal data; and the freedom of expression, contained inter alia in the ECHR, which, under certain conditions, grants Internet providers several privileges and freedoms. Each doctrine has its own field of application, but they also have partial overlap. In practice, this creates legal inequality and uncertainty, especially with regard to providers that host online platforms and process User Generated Content.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{,
title = {De geschonden majesteit},
author = {A.J. Nieuwenhuis},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1716.pdf},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-15},
journal = {Ars Aequi},
number = {1},
pages = {21-24.},
abstract = {
Sinds 1830 is in Nederland de majesteitsschennis strafbaar; met enige regelmaat vinden er ook vervolgingen plaats. Hieronder wordt de vraag gesteld of een dergelijk delict in een moderne democratie wel bestaansrecht heeft. De vraag wordt beantwoord door aandacht te besteden aan de rechtsgoederen die een verbod van belediging kan beschermen, aan de verhouding tussen vrijheid van meningsuiting en democratie, aan de onschendbaarheid van de koning, en aan de ontwikkeling van het positieve recht.
},
note = {
Opinie
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@misc{,
title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 21 juli 2015 (Satakunnan Markkinap\"{o}rssi Oy & Satamedia Oy / Finland)},
author = {van der Sloot, B.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1705.pdf},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-14},
journal = {European Human Rights Cases},
number = {1},
abstract = {
In Finland is de belastinginformatie over burgers openbaar. Twee Finse bedrijven besluiten daar gebruik van te maken. Het ene publiceert delen van de informatie in een magazine, het andere runt een SMS-dienst, waarbij op naam informatie omtrent belastingen kan worden opgevraagd over derde personen. De vraag is of dit rechtmatig is. De nationale procedure is hieromtrent niet eenduidig. Er worden prejudici\"{e}le vragen gesteld aan het Hof van Justitie. Dit antwoordt dat de bedrijfsactiviteiten hebben te gelden als een verwerking van persoonsgegevens onder de Richtlijn bescherming persoonsgegevens, maar stelt tevens dat de bedrijven mogelijkerwijs een beroep kunnen doen op de in de richtlijn vervatte journalistieke exceptie. De Finse autoriteiten oordelen echter anders en wegen het recht op vrijheid van meningsuiting van de bedrijven tegen het recht op privacy van de burgers, waarbij het tweede belang zwaarder weegt. De bedrijven stappen naar het Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens. Dat laat dit oordeel in stand.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@techreport{,
title = {Freedom of expression: still a precondition for democracy?},
author = {T. McGonagle},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1707.pdf},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-14},
note = {
Conference Report, Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2015, 24 pp.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}

@misc{,
title = {Editorial},
author = {van der Sloot, B.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1695.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-12-15},
journal = {European Data Protection Law Review},
number = {2},
pages = {91-96},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@misc{,
title = {Editorial},
author = {van der Sloot, B.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1696.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-12-15},
journal = {European Data Protection Law Review},
number = {3},
pages = {161-163.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@misc{,
title = {Book Review: Smart Technologies and the End(s) of Law},
author = {van der Sloot, B.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1697.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-12-15},
journal = {European Data Protection Law Review},
number = {2},
pages = {148-150.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@misc{,
title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 16 juli 2015 (Coty / Stadtsparkasse)},
author = {van der Sloot, B.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1698.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-12-15},
journal = {European Human Rights Cases},
number = {10},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@misc{,
title = {Is the Human Rights Framework Still Fit for the Big Data Era? A Discussion of the ECtHR's Case Law on Privacy Violations Arising from Surveillance Activities},
author = {van der Sloot, B.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1701.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-12-15},
abstract = {
Human rights protect humans. This seemingly uncontroversial axiom might become quintessential over time, especially with regard to the right to privacy. Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights grants natural persons> a right to complain, in order to protect their individual interests, such as those related to personal freedom, human dignity and individual autonomy. With Big Data processes, however, individuals are mostly unaware that their personal data are gathered and processed and even if they are, they are often unable to substantiate their specific individual interest in these large data gathering systems. When the European Court of Human Rights assesses these types of cases, mostly revolving around (mass) surveillance activities, it finds itself stuck between the human rights framework on the one hand and the desire to evaluate surveillance practices by states on the other. Interestingly, the Court chooses to deal with these cases under Article 8 ECHR, but in order to do so, it is forced to go beyond the fundamental pillars of the human rights framework.
},
note = {
In: S. Gutwirth et al. (eds.), <a href="http://www.springer.com/us/book/9789401773751#aboutBook" target="_blank"><em>Data Protection on the Move</em></a>, Law, Governance and Technology Series 24, 2016.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@article{,
title = {Open Data, Privacy, and Fair Information Principles: Towards a Balancing Framework},
author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius and M.M.M. van Eechoud},
url = {http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2695005},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-12-03},
abstract = {
Open data are held to contribute to a wide variety of social and political goals, including strengthening transparency, public participation and democratic accountability, promoting economic growth and innovation, and enabling greater public sector efficiency and cost savings. However, releasing government data that contain personal information may threaten privacy and related rights and interests. In this paper we ask how these privacy interests can be respected, without unduly hampering benefits from disclosing public sector information. We propose a balancing framework to help public authorities address this question in different contexts. The framework takes into account different levels of privacy risks for different types of data. It also separates decisions about access and re-use, and highlights a range of different disclosure routes. A circumstance catalogue lists factors that might be considered when assessing whether, under which conditions, and how a dataset can be released. While open data remains an important route for the publication of government information, we conclude that it is not the only route, and there must be clear and robust public interest arguments in order to justify the disclosure of personal information as open data.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@techreport{,
title = {Comparative study of best European practices of online content regulation: Law and policy of online content regulation, in particular defamation online, in the light of Albanian legislative proposals},
author = {P. Cavaliere and D. Pavli and K. Irion},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1683.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-11-10},
note = {
Study commissioned by the Council of Europe, Amsterdam/Edinburgh/Tirana, August 2015.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}

@misc{,
title = {Safe Harbor 2.0 gedoemd te mislukken},
author = {A.M. Arnbak},
url = {https://www.axelarnbak.nl/2015/11/05/16e-column-financieele-dagblad-privacy-week-safe-harbor-2-0-gedoemd-te-mislukken/},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-11-05},
note = {
Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 4 november 2015.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@article{,
title = {Cloud services made in Europe after Snowden and Schrems},
author = {K. Irion},
url = {http://policyreview.info/articles/news/cloud-services-made-europe-after-snowden-and-schrems/377},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-10-27},
note = {
Comment in Internet Policy Review, 23 October 2015.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{,
title = {New Data Security Requirements and the Proceduralization of Mass Surveillance Law after the European Data Retention Case},
author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius and A.M. Arnbak},
url = {http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2678860},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-10-27},
abstract = {
This paper discusses the regulation of mass metadata surveillance in Europe through the lens of the landmark judgment in which the Court of Justice of the European Union struck down the Data Retention Directive. The controversial directive obliged telecom and Internet access providers in Europe to retain metadata of all their customers for intelligence and law enforcement purposes, for a period of up to two years. In the ruling, the Court declared the directive in violation of the human rights to privacy and data protection. The Court also confirmed that the mere collection of metadata interferes with the human right to privacy. In addition, the Court developed three new criteria for assessing the level of data security required from a human rights perspective: security measures should take into account the risk of unlawful access to data, and the data’s quantity and sensitivity. While organizations that campaigned against the directive have welcomed the ruling, we warn for the risk of proceduralization of mass surveillance law. The Court did not fully condemn mass surveillance that relies on metadata, but left open the possibility of mass surveillance if policymakers lay down sufficient procedural safeguards. Such proceduralization brings systematic risks for human rights. Government agencies, with ample resources, can design complicated systems of procedural oversight for mass surveillance – and claim that mass surveillance is lawful, even if it affects millions of innocent people.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@book{,
title = {Freedom of Expression, the Media and Journalists: Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights},
author = {T. McGonagle},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1644.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-10-23},
pages = {409},
publisher = {European Audiovisual Observatory},
address = {Strasbourg},
series = {IRIS Themes},
abstract = {
This e-book provides valuable insights into the European Court of Human Rights’ case-law on freedom of expression and media and journalistic freedoms. The first edition of the e-book (2013) proved hugely successful, with 18,671 downloads in 2014 alone. The new updated edition summarises over 240 judgments or decisions by the Court and provides hyperlinks to the full text of each of the summarised judgments or decisions (via HUDOC, the Court's online case-law database). The e-book is also available in French.

For an optimal navigational experience, one should download the e-book and read the technical tips on p. 3.
},
note = {
New, updated version.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}

@inbook{McGonagle2015,
title = {Positive obligations concerning freedom of expression: mere potential or real power?},
author = {McGonagle, T.},
url = {https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=0900001680706afe},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-10-23},
pages = {9-35.},
abstract = {
This chapter examines how the European Court of Human Rights has identified and developed a range of positive State obligations to secure the right to freedom of expression.  It first briefly examines the theoretical and normative bases for the positive obligations doctrine and then traces its hesitant development in the case-law of the Court. Next, it shows how the Court has slowly become more comfortable with the doctrine and more confident when applying it to cases involving freedom of expression, culminating in its \emph{Dink v. Turkey} judgment. The driving argument of the chapter is that the positive obligations doctrine has enormous potential for strengthening the right to freedom of expression and that the Court must now tease out its implications in concrete cases in a very scrupulous way, if the doctrine’s full potential is to be realised.
},
note = {Chapter in: Journalism at risk: Threats, challenges and perspectives, O. Andreotti (ed.), Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing 2015, p. 9-35.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}

@misc{,
title = {Datatransport - Hof EU nog steeds niet volwassen},
author = {A.M. Arnbak},
url = {https://www.axelarnbak.nl/2015/10/07/15e-column-financieele-dagblad-datatransport-hof-eu-nog-steeds-niet-volwassen/},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-10-09},
note = {
Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 7 oktober 2015.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@misc{,
title = {Freedom of expression: new opportunities and challenges},
author = {T. McGonagle},
url = {http://play.webvideocore.net/popplayer.php?it=55i5kw2syio0&is_link=1&w=720&h=405&pause=1&title=1502002+-+Tarlach+McGonagle+Interview+-+ENG&skin=3&repeat=&brandNW=1&start_volume=100&bg_gradient1=&bg_gradient2=&fullscreen=&fs_mode=0&skinAlpha=80&colorBase=%},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-10-09},
abstract = {
This is one of seven videos about different aspects of the right to freedom of expression: hate speech, protection of sources, defamation, access to information, terrorism, Internet freedom and new opportunities and challenges for freedom of expression. The videos were produced  by the Council of Europe and they take the form of interviews with leading experts in the field, including three sitting judges of the European Court of Human Rights, a former Vice-President of the Court and the Council of Europe Human Rights Commissioner.
},
note = {
Video series produced by the Council of Europe, The Hows and Whys: Freedom of Expression, a Human Right, October 2015.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@article{,
title = {Your Digital Home is No Longer Your Castle: How Cloud Computing Transforms the (Legal) Relationship between Individuals and Their Personal Records},
author = {Irion, K.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1584.pdf},
doi = {10.1093/ijlit/eav015},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-09-29},
journal = {International Journal of Law and Information Technology},
volume = {23},
number = {4},
pages = {348-371.},
abstract = {In line with the overall trend individuals’ personal affairs, too, are composed of digital records to an increasing amount. At about the same time, the era of local storage in end user equipment is about to give way to remote computing where data resides on third party equipment (cloud computing). Once information, and even the most personal one, is no longer stored on personal equipment the relationship between individual users and their digital assets belonging to them is becoming increasingly abstract.
This contribution focuses on the implications of cloud computing for individuals’ unpublicized digital records. The question to be answered is whether - taken together - the progressing virtualization and the disruption of physical control produce a backslide for individual positions of rights. The paper introduces the legal treatment of users’ digital personal records and how a technical transformation in combination with disparate legal protection and prevailing commercial practices are bound to impact the distribution of rights and obligations.
},
note = {(2015) International Journal of Law and Information Technology 23(4): 348-371, DOI: 10.1093/ijlit/eav015, available at http://ijlit.oxfordjournals.org/content/23/4/348.abstract},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{,
title = {Freedom of Expression and 'Right to Be Forgotten' Cases in the Netherlands after Google Spain},
author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius},
url = {http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2652171},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-09-17},
journal = {European Data Protection Law Review},
number = {2},
pages = {113-125.},
abstract = {
Since the Google Spain judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Europeans have, under certain conditions, the right to have search results for their name delisted. This paper examines how the Google Spain judgment has been applied in the Netherlands. Since the Google Spain judgment, Dutch courts have decided on two cases regarding delisting requests. In both cases, the Dutch courts considered freedom of expression aspects of delisting more thoroughly than the Court of Justice. However, the effect of the Google Spain judgment on freedom of expression is difficult to assess, as search engine operators decide about most delisting requests without disclosing much about their decisions.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@misc{,
title = {Annotatie bij Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens 16 juni 2015 (Delfi AS / Estland)},
author = {van der Sloot, B.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1622.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-09-11},
journal = {European Human Rights Cases},
number = {9},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@misc{,
title = {Afluisterwet is juridische gatenkaas},
author = {A.M. Arnbak},
url = {https://www.axelarnbak.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/FD14.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-09-10},
note = {
Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 9 september 2015.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@misc{,
title = {Big data bieden geen keus},
author = {van der Sloot, B.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1620.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-09-04},
journal = {Rechtspraak},
number = {3},
pages = {22-24.},
note = {
Interview in <em>Rechtspraak, </em>Magazine van de Raad voor de Rechtspraak.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@misc{,
title = {Your Digital Home Is No Longer Your Castle: How cloud computing transforms the (legal) relationship between individuals and their personal records},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1614.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-09-01},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {presentation}
}

@article{,
title = {Online Price Discrimination and Data Protection Law},
author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius},
url = {http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2652665},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-09-01},
abstract = {
Online shops can offer each website customer a different price – a practice called first degree price discrimination, or personalised pricing. An online shop can recognise a customer, for instance through a cookie, and categorise the customer as a rich or a poor person. The shop could, for instance, charge rich people higher prices. From an economic perspective, there are good arguments in favour of price discrimination. But many regard price discrimination as unfair or manipulative. This paper examines whether European data protection law applies to personalised pricing. Data protection law applies if personal data are processed. This paper argues that personalised pricing generally entails the processing of personal data. Therefore, data protection law generally applies to personalised pricing. That conclusion has several implications. For instance, data protection law requires a company to inform people about the purpose of processing their personal data. A company must inform customers if it personalises prices.
},
note = {
Forthcoming as a conference paper for the Amsterdam Privacy Conference 23-26 October 2015.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@misc{,
title = {Maak de makers van software aansprakelijk},
author = {A.M. Arnbak},
url = {https://www.axelarnbak.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/FD13.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-08-20},
note = {
Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 12 augustus 2015.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@misc{,
title = {Onno Hoes vs. PowNed: ook een burgemeester heeft recht op privacy},
author = {A.W. Hins},
url = {http://jnmblog.nl/articles/onno-hoes-vs.-powned-ook-een-burgemeester-heeft-recht-op-privacy},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-08-20},
note = {
Bijdrage aan webblog Journalistiek en Nieuwe Media van de Universiteit Leiden.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@misc{,
title = {Privacy van consumenten},
author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1589.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-07-17},
note = {
Hoofdstuk in: Handboek Consumentenrecht: Een overzicht van de rechtspositie van de consument, prof. mr. E.H. Hondius, mr. G.J. Rijken (red.), 2015.

ISBN 9789462510753.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@misc{,
title = {Europa gaat te traag met beleid voor versleuteling},
author = {A.M. Arnbak},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1588.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-07-16},
note = {
Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 15 juli 2015.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@article{,
title = {Access to Personal Data and the Right to Good Governance during Asylum Procedures after the CJEU's YS and M. and S. judgment (C-141/12 and C-372/12)},
author = {Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.},
url = {http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/15718166-12342080},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-07-10},
journal = {European Journal of Migration and Law},
pages = {259-272.},
abstract = {
In the YS. and M. and S. judgment, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on three procedures in which Dutch judges asked for clarification on the right of asylum seekers to have access to the documents regarding the decision on asylum applications. The judgment is relevant for interpreting the concept of personal data and the scope of the right of access under the Data Protection Directive, and the right to good administration in the eu Charter of Fundamental Rights. At first glance, the judgment seems disappointing from the viewpoint of individual rights. Nevertheless, in our view the judgment provides sufficient grounds for effective access rights to the minutes in future asylum cases.
},
note = {
Case report.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{,
title = {Personal data processing for behavioural targeting: which legal basis?},
author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius},
url = {http://idpl.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/06/23/idpl.ipv011.abstract?keytype=ref&ijkey=vlrPCGCUMXW8kAz},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-06-25},
journal = {International Data Privacy Law},
abstract = {
Key Points:

The European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights only allows personal data processing if a data controller has a legal basis for the processing.

This paper argues that, in most circumstances, the only available legal basis for the processing of personal data for behavioural targeting is the data subject's unambiguous consent.

Furthermore, the paper argues that the cookie consent requirement from the e-Privacy Directive does not provide a legal basis for the processing of personal data.

Therefore, even if companies could use an opt-out system to comply with the e-Privacy Directive's consent requirement for using a tracking cookie, they would generally have to obtain the data subject's unambiguous consent if they process personal data for behavioural targeting.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@misc{,
title = {Lobby in Europa zorgt voor absurd internetbeleid},
author = {A.M. Arnbak},
url = {https://www.axelarnbak.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/fd11.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-06-18},
note = {
Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 17 juni 2015.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@inbook{McGonagle2015,
title = {The development of freedom of expression and information within the UN: leaps and bounds or fits and starts?},
author = {McGonagle, T.},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-06-05},
abstract = {
This chapter tells the story of how the rights to freedom of expression and information have been shaped by the United Nations’ (UN) institutional dynamics over the years. It gives an account of how the growth of the rights to freedom of expression and information has been both stimulated and stymied by different factors in the particular institutional context of the UN. It traces the broad contours of the two rights by connecting the largest conceptual, normative, historical and institutional dots.

The chapter opens with a brief exploration of the contiguous nature of the rights to freedom of expression and information. This necessarily involves reflection on the instrumental role that the media and new communications technologies can play in the realization of both rights in practice. The remainder of the chapter has an overtly institutional focus. Its next three substantive sections correspond to three broad \textendash roughly chronological, but occasionally overlapping - phases in the development of freedom of expression and information at the UN. Each period is denoted by its key features or aspirations: trail-blazing, consolidation and expansion, and the quest for coherence and consistency. Various thematic challenges have presented themselves during these periods, a number of which are woven into the chapter’s narrative. Finally, after offering some substantive conclusions, the chapter will explain the objectives and structure of the book as a whole.
},
note = {
In: <a href="http://www.cambridge.org/nl/academic/subjects/law/un-and-international-organisations/united-nations-and-freedom-expression-and-information-critical-perspectives?format=HB" target="_blank">The United Nations and Freedom of Expression and Information: Critical Perspectives</a>, T. McGonagle & Y. Donders (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2015, pp. 1-51.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}

@book{,
title = {The United Nations and Freedom of Expression and Information: Critical Perspectives},
author = {Y.M. Donders and T. McGonagle},
url = {http://www.cambridge.org/nl/academic/subjects/law/un-and-international-organisations/united-nations-and-freedom-expression-and-information-critical-perspectives?format=HB},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-06-04},
abstract = {
This book provides a critical and uniquely comprehensive examination of the main UN standards and mechanisms dealing with the rights to freedom of expression and information. It details the chequered history of both rights within the UN system and evaluates the suitability of the system for overcoming contemporary challenges and threats to both rights.

The book’s institutional focus comprises five international treaties, UNESCO and the UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression. Different aspects of freedom of expression and information are foregrounded in different treaties, to ensure the effective enjoyment of both rights by particular groups, eg. children or persons with disabilities, or the meaningful application of the rights in particular situations, eg. combating racism.

The book’s thematic focus examines a selection of themes that are prompting fresh thinking about the substance and scope of the rights to freedom of expression and information, eg. the impact of new communication technologies.
},
note = {
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, June 2015, 534 pp.

ISBN: 9781107083868.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}

@article{,
title = {De implicaties van het Google Spain-arrest voor de vrijheid van meningsuiting},
author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius and S. Kulk},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1566.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-06-04},
journal = {NJCM-Bulletin},
number = {1},
pages = {3-19.},
abstract = {
In deze bijdrage wordt het \emph{Google Spain-}arrest van het Hof van Justitie van de Europese Unie besproken, evenals de ontwikkelingen na het arrest. Centraal staat de vraag naar de gevolgen van het arrest voor de vrijheid van meningsuiting. De auteurs betogen dat het Hof onvoldoende aandacht schenkt aan de vrijheid van meningsuiting.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{,
title = {Ongerichte interceptie, of het verwerven van bulk-communicatie, en waarom de Grondwet en het EVRM onvoldoende tegenwicht bieden},
author = {Eskens, S.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/eskens_computerrecht2015/},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-05-22},
journal = {Computerrecht},
volume = {2015},
number = {3},
pages = {125-131},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{,
title = {Privacy as Personality Right: Why the ECtHR's Focus on Ulterior Interests Might Prove Indispensable in the Age of },
author = {van der Sloot, B.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1555.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-05-22},
journal = {Utrecht Journal of International and European Law},
number = {80},
pages = {25-50.},
abstract = {
Article 8 ECHR was adopted as a classic negative right, which provides the citizen protection from unlawful and arbitrary interference by the state with his private and family life, home and communication. The ECtHR, however, has gradually broadened its scope so that the right to privacy encroaches upon other provisions embodied in the Convention, includes rights and freedoms explicitly left out of the ECHR by the drafters of the Convention and functions as the main pillar on which the Court has built its practice of opening up the Convention for new rights and freedoms. Consequently, Article 8 ECHR has been transformed from a classic privacy right to a personality right, providing protection to the personal development of individuals. Apart from its theoretical significance, this shift might prove indispensable in the age of Big Data, as personality rights protect a different type of interest, which is far more easy to substantiate in the new technological paradigm than those associated with the right to privacy.
},
note = {
DOI: <a href="http://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.cp">http://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.cp</a>
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@misc{,
title = {Book review: 'Reforming European Data Protection Law'},
author = {van der Sloot, B.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1556.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-05-21},
journal = {European Data Protection Law Review},
number = {1},
pages = {85-87.},
note = {
Boekbespreking van <em>Reforming European Data Protection Law</em>, S. Gutwirth, R. Leenes en P. de Hert (eds.), Springer 2015.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@misc{,
title = {Annotatie bij Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens 27 januari 2015 (Paradiso & Campanelli / Itali\"{e})},
author = {van der Sloot, B.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1557.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-05-20},
journal = {European Human Rights Cases},
number = {5},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@article{,
title = {Het mijnenveld van het informatierecht},
author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1552.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-05-12},
journal = {Mr.},
number = {5},
pages = {62-67},
abstract = {
In theorie lijkt de bescherming van persoonsgegevens op orde: internetbedrijven moeten mensen informeren over wat er met hun gegevens gebeurt, en doorgaans toestemming vragen voor ze die gegevens gebruiken. Maar in de praktijk schiet die ‘geïnformeerde toestemming’ als privacybeschermingsmaatregel tekort. Om privacy beter te beschermen moet volgens onderzoeker Frederik Borgesius de privacywetgeving beter worden nageleefd en gehandhaafd én op de schop. Hij pleit voor een breder privacydebat. “We móeten dat mijnenveld in.”
},
note = {
Interview.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@misc{,
title = {'Van de koning zelf mag het ook'},
author = {E.J. Dommering},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1551.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-05-06},
note = {
Interview in Het Parool van 6 mei 2015.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@misc{,
title = {Verzameldrift 'big data' grijpt om zich heen},
author = {E.J. Dommering and N.A.N.M. van Eijk},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1550.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-05-05},
abstract = {
Het bewaren van communicatiegegevens van alle Nederlandse telefoon- en internetgebruikers is terecht door het Europese Hof van Justitie verboden.
},
note = {
Opinie in De Volkskrant van 5 mei 2015.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@misc{,
title = {Internet der dingen zwaar beveiligen},
author = {A.M. Arnbak},
url = {https://www.axelarnbak.nl/2015/04/24/9e-column-financieele-dagblad-levensgevaarlijk-internet-der-dingen-zwaar-beveiligen/},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-04-28},
note = {
Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 22 april 2015.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}

@article{,
title = {De ongeldigverklaring van de Dataretentierichtlijn: een nieuwe stap in de bescherming van de grondrechten door het Hof van Justitie},
author = {H. Hijmans},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1544.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-04-24},
journal = {Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht},
number = {7},
pages = {245-252},
abstract = {
Op 8 april 2014 heeft het Hof van Justitie een opmerkelijk arrest gewezen in de gevoegde zaken Digital Rights Ireland en Seitlinger. Het heeft voor het eerst wegens strijd met het EUHandvest voor de grondrechten een richtlijn in zijn geheel vernietigd. Het Hof van Justitie heeft geoordeeld dat de Uniewetgever met de vaststelling van de Dataretentierichtlijn de door het evenredigheidsbeginsel gestelde grenzen heeft overschreden die hij in het licht van de artikelen 7, 8 en 52 lid 1 van het Handvest in acht dient te nemen. Het heeft geen beperking in de tijd aangebracht (het Hof van Justitie wijkt hiermee af van de conclusie van advocaat-generaal Cruz Villalón, overwegingen 154-158).
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{,
title = {De geheime dienst: An offer you can't refuse},
author = {van der Sloot, B.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1547.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-04-24},
journal = {Ars Aequi},
pages = {172-173.},
abstract = {
Geheime diensten beschermen de burger tegen een gevaar waarvan zij zich niet vaak niet eens bewust zijn. Dat zij zich daarbij nauwelijks aan banden laten leggen bleek wel toen geheimen van het hoofdkwartier van de NSA naar buiten werden gebracht.
},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}