Josephine Williams
Josephine Williams was selected as a 2019 UC Presidential Fellow by the University of California, Los Angeles after completing her JD at UCLA. At UCLA Law she specialised in international and public interest law. Prior to her law studies, she was a State Department (foreign service) translator, and a federally certified court interpreter, specialising in simultaneous interpretation in courtrooms along the US-Mexico border as well as throughout California. She has interned for the Office of the United States Trade Representative and the European Commission’s Directorate General for Competition. Under the auspices of the fellowship at IvIR, she intends to study international approaches to AI and data governance, particularly under the lens of trade law.
Publicaties
| Eskens, S., van Daalen, O., van Eijk, N. 10 Standards for Oversight and Transparency of National Intelligence Services Journal of National Security Law & Policy, 8 (3), pp. 553-594, 2016. @article{Eskens2016, title = {10 Standards for Oversight and Transparency of National Intelligence Services}, author = {Eskens, S. and van Daalen, O. and van Eijk, N.}, url = {http://jnslp.com/2016/07/25/10-standards-oversight-transparency-national-intelligence-services/ https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/JNSLP_2016_3.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-09-15}, journal = {Journal of National Security Law & Policy}, volume = {8}, number = {3}, pages = {553-594}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Hugenholtz, P. Something Completely Different: Europe's Sui Generis Database Right Chapter 9, pp. p. 205-222, 2016, (In: The Internet and the Emerging Importance of New Forms of Intellectual Property, S. Frankel and D. Gervais (eds.), Information Law Series, Vol. 37, Kluwer Law International 2016.). @inbook{Hugenholtz2016b, title = {Something Completely Different: Europe's Sui Generis Database Right}, author = {Hugenholtz, P.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Chapter9_ILS37.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-09-15}, pages = {p. 205-222}, chapter = {9}, series = {Information Law Series}, abstract = {This chapter traces the sui generis database right’s historic roots, describes its main features, compares it to copyright, questions its legal nature especially in the light of international intellectual property agreements, and finally examines to what extent the goals of the Directive have been met.}, note = {In: The Internet and the Emerging Importance of New Forms of Intellectual Property, S. Frankel and D. Gervais (eds.), Information Law Series, Vol. 37, Kluwer Law International 2016.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {inbook} } This chapter traces the sui generis database right’s historic roots, describes its main features, compares it to copyright, questions its legal nature especially in the light of international intellectual property agreements, and finally examines to what extent the goals of the Directive have been met. |
| Caspers, M. The Commission’s proposed TDM exception: Who’s to benefit? 2016, visited: 15.09.2016, (Post on Kluwer Copyright Blog). @online{Caspers2016, title = {The Commission’s proposed TDM exception: Who’s to benefit?}, author = {Caspers, M.}, url = {http://kluwercopyrightblog.com/2016/09/15/commissions-proposed-tdm-exception-whos-benefit/}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-09-15}, urldate = {2016-09-15}, note = {Post on Kluwer Copyright Blog}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {online} } |
| van Eijk, N. Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie 6 oktober 2016 (Schrems / Data Protection Commissioner) Tijdschrift voor Consumentenrecht en handelspraktijken, (4), pp. 189-199, 2016. @article{vanEijk2016, title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie 6 oktober 2016 (Schrems / Data Protection Commissioner)}, author = {van Eijk, N. }, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_TvCH_2016_4.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-09-13}, journal = {Tijdschrift voor Consumentenrecht en handelspraktijken}, number = {4}, pages = {189-199}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Dommering, E. Annotatie bij EHRM 21 oktober 2014 (Vural / Turkije) Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, (36), pp. 4465-4471, 2016, (nr. 336). @article{Dommering2016b, title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 21 oktober 2014 (Vural / Turkije)}, author = {Dommering, E. }, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2016_336.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-09-13}, journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie}, number = {36}, pages = {4465-4471}, abstract = {Vrijheid van meningsuiting. Veroordeling tot ruim 13 jaar gevangenisstraf en ontneming kiesrecht wegens belediging nagedachtenis Atat\"{u}rk door standbeelden met verf te besmeuren. Proportionaliteit. Schending art. 10 EVRM en art. 3 Eerste Protocol. }, note = {nr. 336}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Vrijheid van meningsuiting. Veroordeling tot ruim 13 jaar gevangenisstraf en ontneming kiesrecht wegens belediging nagedachtenis Atatürk door standbeelden met verf te besmeuren. Proportionaliteit. Schending art. 10 EVRM en art. 3 Eerste Protocol. |
| Dommering, E. Annotatie bij EHRM 1 december 2015 (Cengiz e.a. / Turkije) Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, (36), pp. 4471-4478, 2016, (nr. 337). @article{Dommering2016b, title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 1 december 2015 (Cengiz e.a. / Turkije)}, author = {Dommering, E. }, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2016_337.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-09-13}, journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie}, number = {36}, pages = {4471-4478}, abstract = {De vrijheid om inlichtingen of denkbeelden te ontvangen of te verstrekken. Blokkering toegang (video)website YouTube. Onvoldoende wetttelijke basis. Schending art. 10 EVRM.}, note = {nr. 337}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } De vrijheid om inlichtingen of denkbeelden te ontvangen of te verstrekken. Blokkering toegang (video)website YouTube. Onvoldoende wetttelijke basis. Schending art. 10 EVRM. |
| Dommering, E. Het verschil van mening, geschiedenis van een verkeerd begrepen idee Uitgeverij Prometheus, 2016, ISBN: 9789035142619. @book{Dommering2016, title = {Het verschil van mening, geschiedenis van een verkeerd begrepen idee}, author = {Dommering, E. }, url = {http://uitgeverijprometheus.nl/catalogus/het-verschil-van-mening.html}, isbn = {9789035142619}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-09-06}, pages = {688 pp}, publisher = {Uitgeverij Prometheus}, abstract = {Vrijheid is een oud begrip dat staat voor het zich losmaken van groepen en individuen uit de macht van een ander. Die vrijheid werd gesymboliseerd door de zogenoemde vrijheidshoed, want in het Romeinse Rijk mocht een vrijgemaakte slaaf een hoofddeksel gaan dragen. In Europa krijgt vrijheid als eerste gestalte in de godsdienstvrijheid en het eigendomsrecht. Het geloof wordt losgemaakt van het gezag van de kerkelijke autoriteit. De eigendom is niet langer een privilege toegekend door een vorst, maar iets wat je verwerft door inbezitneming of door eigen inspanning. De vrijheid van denken en spreken bepaalt hoe wij over de samenleving en de natuur denken. Het publieke debat en het democratische besluit vervangen het door God gegeven politieke gezag. Het onderzoek naar de natuur komt in de plaats van een godsdienstig wereldbeeld. Deze vrijheden hebben de Europese democratie gemaakt tot wat zij nu is. Het verschil van mening geeft een idee\"{e}ngeschiedenis van deze vrijheden, waarbij de vrijheid van meningsuiting centraal staat. Het boek trekt de lijn door naar het heden en de rol van internet, dat alle kennis in de wereld toegankelijk maakt, maar onder zijn eigen toegankelijkheid lijkt te bezwijken. De burgers die hun vrijheden op internet uitoefenen, hebben er een elektronische politieman bij gekregen die permanent over hun schouder meekijkt. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {book} } Vrijheid is een oud begrip dat staat voor het zich losmaken van groepen en individuen uit de macht van een ander. Die vrijheid werd gesymboliseerd door de zogenoemde vrijheidshoed, want in het Romeinse Rijk mocht een vrijgemaakte slaaf een hoofddeksel gaan dragen. In Europa krijgt vrijheid als eerste gestalte in de godsdienstvrijheid en het eigendomsrecht. Het geloof wordt losgemaakt van het gezag van de kerkelijke autoriteit. De eigendom is niet langer een privilege toegekend door een vorst, maar iets wat je verwerft door inbezitneming of door eigen inspanning. De vrijheid van denken en spreken bepaalt hoe wij over de samenleving en de natuur denken. Het publieke debat en het democratische besluit vervangen het door God gegeven politieke gezag. Het onderzoek naar de natuur komt in de plaats van een godsdienstig wereldbeeld. Deze vrijheden hebben de Europese democratie gemaakt tot wat zij nu is. Het verschil van mening geeft een ideeëngeschiedenis van deze vrijheden, waarbij de vrijheid van meningsuiting centraal staat. Het boek trekt de lijn door naar het heden en de rol van internet, dat alle kennis in de wereld toegankelijk maakt, maar onder zijn eigen toegankelijkheid lijkt te bezwijken. De burgers die hun vrijheden op internet uitoefenen, hebben er een elektronische politieman bij gekregen die permanent over hun schouder meekijkt. |
| Dommering, E. Annotatie bij EHRM 22 april 2013 (zaak Animal Defenders International / Verenigd Koninkrijk) Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, (34/35), pp. 4301-4303, 2016. @article{Dommering2016b, title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 22 april 2013 (zaak Animal Defenders International / Verenigd Koninkrijk)}, author = {Dommering, E. }, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2016_321.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-09-06}, journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie}, number = {34/35}, pages = {4301-4303}, abstract = {Nationaal verbod van politieke reclame niet in strijd met artikel 10 EVRM, terugkomen op eerdere beslissing?}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Nationaal verbod van politieke reclame niet in strijd met artikel 10 EVRM, terugkomen op eerdere beslissing? |
| Breemen, J., Breemen, V. Kroniek Mediarecht KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi, 140 , pp. 8150-8152, 2016, ISSN: 2212-5205-3. @article{Breemen2016b, title = {Kroniek Mediarecht}, author = {Breemen, J. and Breemen, V.}, issn = {2212-5205-3}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-09-01}, journal = {KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi}, volume = {140}, pages = {8150-8152}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
A Few Legal and Economic Questions pp. p. 104-110, 2016, (In: I have a friend who knows someone who bought a video once, On collecting video art, L. Bombelli & C. Ciuti (eds.), Milano: Mousse Publishing 2016.). @inbook{Dommering2016b, title = {A Few Legal and Economic Questions}, author = {Dommering, E.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/LOOP.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-08-12}, pages = {p. 104-110}, note = {In: I have a friend who knows someone who bought a video once, On collecting video art, L. Bombelli & C. Ciuti (eds.), Milano: Mousse Publishing 2016.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {inbook} } |
| Leerssen, P., Maalderink, R., McGonagle, T. 2016. @techreport{McGonagle2016c, title = {Compilation of selected best practices for the implementation of Recommendation CM/Rec(2016)4 & Proposals for further follow-up activities}, author = {McGonagle, T. and Leerssen, P. and Maalderink, R.}, url = {https://rm.coe.int/selected-best-practices-for-implementation-of-cm-rec-2016-4/1680726c3b}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-08-11}, abstract = {Report commissioned by the Council of Europe, 11 August 2016, 24 pp.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } Report commissioned by the Council of Europe, 11 August 2016, 24 pp. |
| Poort, J. Auteursrechtdebat: De ontvlochten uitgeverij 2016. @article{, title = {Auteursrechtdebat: De ontvlochten uitgeverij}, author = {J.P. Poort}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1823}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-08-09}, note = { Gepubliceerd op IE-Forum.nl op 22 juli 2016, IEF 16134. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Hugenholtz, P. Flexible Copyright. Can EU Author's Right Accommodate Fair Use? 2016. @misc{, title = {Flexible Copyright. Can EU Author's Right Accommodate Fair Use?}, author = {P.B. Hugenholtz}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1821}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-08-02}, abstract = { Almost everyone agrees that modern copyright law needs to be flexible in order to accommodate rapid technological change and evolving media uses. In the United States fair use is the flexible instrument of choice. Author’s right systems in Europe are generally deemed to be less flexible and less tolerant to open-ended limitations and exceptions. But are they really? This chapter makes the case that (1) author’s rights systems can be made as flexible as copyright systems, and (2) that the existing EU legal framework does not preclude the development of flexible norms at the national level. }, note = { In: Copyright Law in an Age of Limitations and Exceptions, R. Okediji (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016, p. 242-258 (forthcoming). }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Almost everyone agrees that modern copyright law needs to be flexible in order to accommodate rapid technological change and evolving media uses. In the United States fair use is the flexible instrument of choice. Author’s right systems in Europe are generally deemed to be less flexible and less tolerant to open-ended limitations and exceptions. But are they really? This chapter makes the case that (1) author’s rights systems can be made as flexible as copyright systems, and (2) that the existing EU legal framework does not preclude the development of flexible norms at the national level. |
| Hugenholtz, P. Concise European Copyright Law (second edition) 2016. @book{, title = {Concise European Copyright Law (second edition)}, author = {P.B. Hugenholtz}, url = {https://lrus.wolterskluwer.com/store/products/concise-european-copyright-law-second-prod-9041128794/hardcover-item-1-9041128794}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-07-21}, abstract = { The second edition of Concise European Copyright Law was published in Spring 2016. Concise European Copyright Law aims to offer the reader a rapid understanding of all the provisions of copyright law in force in Europe that have been enacted at the European and international levels. This volume takes the form of an article-by-article commentary on the relevant EU directives and international treaties in the field of copyright and neighbouring rights. Editors and authors are prominent specialists (academics and practitioners) in the field of international and European copyright law. }, note = { Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2016, 699 pp. ISBN 9789041128799. See table of contents here. See list of authors here. A sample chapter on the EU Database Directive, by Prof. P.B. Hugenholtz, is available here. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {book} } The second edition of Concise European Copyright Law was published in Spring 2016. Concise European Copyright Law aims to offer the reader a rapid understanding of all the provisions of copyright law in force in Europe that have been enacted at the European and international levels. This volume takes the form of an article-by-article commentary on the relevant EU directives and international treaties in the field of copyright and neighbouring rights. Editors and authors are prominent specialists (academics and practitioners) in the field of international and European copyright law. |
| Benabou, V., Bently, L., Dinwoodie, G., Dusollier, S., Derclaye E., Geiger, C., Griffiths, J., Hugenholtz, P., Kretschmer, M., Metzger, A., Peukert, A., Ricolfi, M., Rognstad, O., Vivant, M., Xalabarder, R. Answer to the EC Consultation on the 'panorama exception' 2016. @misc{Hugenholtz2016b, title = {Answer to the EC Consultation on the 'panorama exception'}, author = {Hugenholtz, P. and Benabou, V. and Derclaye E. and Dinwoodie, G. and Dusollier, S. and Geiger, C. and Griffiths, J. and Kretschmer, M. and Metzger, A. and Peukert, A. and Ricolfi, M. and Rognstad, O. and Vivant, M. and Xalabarder, R. and Bently, L.}, url = {http://ivir00.websites.xs4all.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/236.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-07-15}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| McGonagle, T. Annotatie bij EHRM 2 februari 2016 (MTE en Index.hu / Hongarije) European Human Rights Cases, (7), 2016. @article{, title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 2 februari 2016 (MTE en Index.hu / Hongarije)}, author = {McGonagle, T.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_EHRC_2016_7.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-07-15}, journal = {European Human Rights Cases}, number = {7}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Kabel, J. Annotatie bij Vzr. Rb. Amsterdam 18 maart 2016 (Vincent Mentzel / InBev) AMI, (3), pp. 72-73., 2016. @article{, title = {Annotatie bij Vzr. Rb. Amsterdam 18 maart 2016 (Vincent Mentzel / InBev)}, author = {J.J.C. Kabel}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1815}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-07-15}, journal = {AMI}, number = {3}, pages = {72-73.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| van Gompel, S. Annotatie bij Vzr. Rb. Den Haag 16 maart 2016 (Bavaria / Your Hosting) 2016. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij Vzr. Rb. Den Haag 16 maart 2016 (Bavaria / Your Hosting)}, author = {S.J. van Gompel}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1816}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-07-15}, journal = {AMI}, number = {3}, pages = {74.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| van Eechoud, M. Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 21 april 2016 (Austro Mechana / Amazon Sàrl e.a.) 2016. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 21 april 2016 (Austro Mechana / Amazon S\`{a}rl e.a.)}, author = {M.M.M. van Eechoud}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1817}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-07-15}, journal = {AMI}, number = {3}, pages = {78-79.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
European Intellectual Property Review, (7), pp. 458-461., 2016. @article{, title = {CJEU: }, author = {S.D. van Leeuwen}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1818}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-07-15}, journal = {European Intellectual Property Review}, number = {7}, pages = {458-461.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Hugenholtz, P. 2016. @misc{, title = {Making the Digital Single Market Work for Copyright. Extending the Satellite & Cable Directive to content services on line}, author = {P.B. Hugenholtz}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1819}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-07-15}, abstract = { Despite 25 years of copyright harmonization the law of copyright in the EU has remained, essentially, national and territorial. For the world of tangible (physical) goods a similar problem of market fragmentation was solved decades ago by the ECJ establishing a rule of ‘Community exhaustion’ of the right of distribution. Ever since, goods incorporating intellectual property, such as records, books and trademarked clothing, may circulate freely across the EU after their initial authorized marketing in a Member State. Why not introduce a similar rule for the world of non-physical distribution? We do have an interesting precedent. Satellite broadcasting market suffered from similar copyright problems as the on line content services market today. In 1993 the Sat-Cab Directive solved such problems stating that satellite broadcasting is a relevant act for copyright purposes only in the country of origin of the signal. As a consequence, a license to broadcast audiovisual content by satellite would be needed only in the Member State from where the satellite signal was uplinked. This article examines the legal ramifications of the extension of the country of origin principle to the on line environment. }, note = { In: The Digital Single Market Copyright: Internet and Copyright Law in the European Perspective, Conference proceedings, Milan 4-5 November 2015, M. Franzosi, O. Pollicino & G. Campus (ed.). ISBN: 9788854894419. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Despite 25 years of copyright harmonization the law of copyright in the EU has remained, essentially, national and territorial. For the world of tangible (physical) goods a similar problem of market fragmentation was solved decades ago by the ECJ establishing a rule of ‘Community exhaustion’ of the right of distribution. Ever since, goods incorporating intellectual property, such as records, books and trademarked clothing, may circulate freely across the EU after their initial authorized marketing in a Member State. Why not introduce a similar rule for the world of non-physical distribution? We do have an interesting precedent. Satellite broadcasting market suffered from similar copyright problems as the on line content services market today. In 1993 the Sat-Cab Directive solved such problems stating that satellite broadcasting is a relevant act for copyright purposes only in the country of origin of the signal. As a consequence, a license to broadcast audiovisual content by satellite would be needed only in the Member State from where the satellite signal was uplinked. This article examines the legal ramifications of the extension of the country of origin principle to the on line environment. |
| Hugenholtz, P. 2016, ISBN: 9788854894419, (In: The Digital Single Market Copyright: Internet and Copyright Law in the European Perspective, Conference proceedings, Milan 4-5 November 2015, M. Franzosi, O. Pollicino & G. Campus (ed.).). @inbook{Hugenholtz2016b, title = {Making the Digital Single Market Work for Copyright. Extending the Satellite & Cable Directive to content services on line}, author = {Hugenholtz, P. }, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/makingthedigitalsinglemarketworkforcopyright/}, isbn = {9788854894419}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-07-15}, abstract = {Despite 25 years of copyright harmonization the law of copyright in the EU has remained, essentially, national and territorial. For the world of tangible (physical) goods a similar problem of market fragmentation was solved decades ago by the ECJ establishing a rule of ‘Community exhaustion’ of the right of distribution. Ever since, goods incorporating intellectual property, such as records, books and trademarked clothing, may circulate freely across the EU after their initial authorized marketing in a Member State. Why not introduce a similar rule for the world of non-physical distribution? We do have an interesting precedent. Satellite broadcasting market suffered from similar copyright problems as the on line content services market today. In 1993 the Sat-Cab Directive solved such problems stating that satellite broadcasting is a relevant act for copyright purposes only in the country of origin of the signal. As a consequence, a license to broadcast audiovisual content by satellite would be needed only in the Member State from where the satellite signal was uplinked. This article examines the legal ramifications of the extension of the country of origin principle to the on line environment.}, note = {In: The Digital Single Market Copyright: Internet and Copyright Law in the European Perspective, Conference proceedings, Milan 4-5 November 2015, M. Franzosi, O. Pollicino & G. Campus (ed.).}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {inbook} } Despite 25 years of copyright harmonization the law of copyright in the EU has remained, essentially, national and territorial. For the world of tangible (physical) goods a similar problem of market fragmentation was solved decades ago by the ECJ establishing a rule of ‘Community exhaustion’ of the right of distribution. Ever since, goods incorporating intellectual property, such as records, books and trademarked clothing, may circulate freely across the EU after their initial authorized marketing in a Member State. Why not introduce a similar rule for the world of non-physical distribution? We do have an interesting precedent. Satellite broadcasting market suffered from similar copyright problems as the on line content services market today. In 1993 the Sat-Cab Directive solved such problems stating that satellite broadcasting is a relevant act for copyright purposes only in the country of origin of the signal. As a consequence, a license to broadcast audiovisual content by satellite would be needed only in the Member State from where the satellite signal was uplinked. This article examines the legal ramifications of the extension of the country of origin principle to the on line environment. |
| Bartl, M., Irion, K., Yakovleva, S. 2016. @techreport{, title = {Trade and privacy: complicated bedfellows? How to achieve data protection-proof free trade agreements}, author = {Irion, K. and Yakovleva, S. and Bartl, M.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/trade_and_privacy.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-07-14}, abstract = {Study commissioned by the European Consumer Organisation/Bureau Europ\'{e}en des Unions de Consommateurs (BEUC), Center for Digital Democracy (CDD), The Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue (TACD) and European Digital Rights (EDRi), 13 July 2016, Amsterdam. The results of the study were widely covered in the Dutch and European media: ‘Privacy onvoldoende gewaarborgd in handelsverdragen EU‘, nu.nl, 13 juli 2016 ‘EU stelt privacy burgers onvoldoende veilig‘, Digital Telegraaf, 13 juli 2016 ‘EU stelt privacy burgers onvoldoende veilig‘, Einhovens Dagblad, 13 juli 2016 Monika Ermert, ‘Transatlantischer Zoff: Digitaler Datenschutz oder digitaler Protektionismus?‘, 16 July 2016, heise.de L\'{e}a Auffret, ‘Why privacy safeguards in trade deals need urgent improvement‘, 20 October 2016, beuc.eu}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } Study commissioned by the European Consumer Organisation/Bureau Européen des Unions de Consommateurs (BEUC), Center for Digital Democracy (CDD), The Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue (TACD) and European Digital Rights (EDRi), 13 July 2016, Amsterdam. The results of the study were widely covered in the Dutch and European media: ‘Privacy onvoldoende gewaarborgd in handelsverdragen EU‘, nu.nl, 13 juli 2016 ‘EU stelt privacy burgers onvoldoende veilig‘, Digital Telegraaf, 13 juli 2016 ‘EU stelt privacy burgers onvoldoende veilig‘, Einhovens Dagblad, 13 juli 2016 Monika Ermert, ‘Transatlantischer Zoff: Digitaler Datenschutz oder digitaler Protektionismus?‘, 16 July 2016, heise.de Léa Auffret, ‘Why privacy safeguards in trade deals need urgent improvement‘, 20 October 2016, beuc.eu |
| van der Sloot, B. 2016. @misc{, title = {Editorial}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1808}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-07-14}, journal = {European Data Protection Law Review}, number = {2}, pages = {145-147.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| van der Sloot, B. Is Tax Data Sensitive Data? Case note GSB v. Switzerland, ECHR 22 December 2015 2016. @misc{, title = {Is Tax Data Sensitive Data? Case note GSB v. Switzerland, ECHR 22 December 2015}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://edpl.lexxion.eu/article/EDPL/2016/2/22}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-07-14}, journal = {European Data Protection Law Review}, number = {2}, pages = {262-265.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| van der Sloot, B. Annotatie bij EHRM 19 januari 2016 (Kalda / Estland) 2016. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 19 januari 2016 (Kalda / Estland)}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1810}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-07-14}, journal = {European Human Rights Cases}, number = {6}, abstract = { De zaak Kalda t. Estland betreft het recht op gedeeltelijke toegang tot het internet van een levenslang gestrafte gevangene. Het gaat hierbij met name om een drietal websites die toegang bieden tot wetgeving, juridische informatie en uitspraken (en vertalingen daarvan) van rechterlijke instanties. Het EHRM stelt in deze zaak dat een dergelijk recht inderdaad wordt beschermd door art. 10 EVRM. Alhoewel de beperking van dit recht in casu is voorgeschreven bij wet en een legitiem doel dient, acht het Hof deze niet noodzakelijk in een democratische samenleving. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } De zaak Kalda t. Estland betreft het recht op gedeeltelijke toegang tot het internet van een levenslang gestrafte gevangene. Het gaat hierbij met name om een drietal websites die toegang bieden tot wetgeving, juridische informatie en uitspraken (en vertalingen daarvan) van rechterlijke instanties. Het EHRM stelt in deze zaak dat een dergelijk recht inderdaad wordt beschermd door art. 10 EVRM. Alhoewel de beperking van dit recht in casu is voorgeschreven bij wet en een legitiem doel dient, acht het Hof deze niet noodzakelijk in een democratische samenleving. |
| van der Sloot, B. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, (3), pp. 439-459., 2016. @article{vanderSloot2016, title = {The Practical and Theoretical Problems with 'Balancing': Delfi, Coty and the Redundancy of the Human Rights Framework}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1811}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-07-14}, journal = {Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law}, number = {3}, pages = {439-459.}, abstract = {In the realm of privacy and data protection \textendash as in the fundamental rights framework in general \textendash balancing has become the standard approach for dealing with legal disputes. It comes, however, with a number of practical and theoretical problems. Th is article analyses those problems and compares the method of balancing with the original approach of most human rights frameworks, such as the European Convention on Human Rights. It does so by analysing two cases in detail: the European Court of Human Right’s case Delfi v. Estonia and the Court of Justice of the EU’s judgment Coty v. Stadtsparkasse. From this analysis, it follows that the concept of balancing signals a shift away from the deontological and towards a utilitarian understanding of fundamental rights. Th is is not only of theoretical importance, as it could also mean that in time, human rights frameworks as such might become redundant. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } In the realm of privacy and data protection – as in the fundamental rights framework in general – balancing has become the standard approach for dealing with legal disputes. It comes, however, with a number of practical and theoretical problems. Th is article analyses those problems and compares the method of balancing with the original approach of most human rights frameworks, such as the European Convention on Human Rights. It does so by analysing two cases in detail: the European Court of Human Right’s case Delfi v. Estonia and the Court of Justice of the EU’s judgment Coty v. Stadtsparkasse. From this analysis, it follows that the concept of balancing signals a shift away from the deontological and towards a utilitarian understanding of fundamental rights. Th is is not only of theoretical importance, as it could also mean that in time, human rights frameworks as such might become redundant. |
| Hugenholtz, P. De rechtspositie van de audiovisuele maker binnen de publieke omroep Mediaforum, (4), pp. 110-115., 2016. @article{, title = {De rechtspositie van de audiovisuele maker binnen de publieke omroep}, author = {P.B. Hugenholtz}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1812}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-07-14}, journal = {Mediaforum}, number = {4}, pages = {110-115.}, abstract = { Dit artikel geeft antwoord op de vraag of er niet een taak ligt, of zou moeten liggen, voor de publieke omroep om als onderdeel van zijn publieke en publiek gefinancierde culturele taak te waarborgen dat audiovisuele makers, die rechtstreeks of door tussenkomst van een producent in opdracht van de publieke omroepen bijdragen leveren aan omroepprogramma's, redelijk worden beloond. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Dit artikel geeft antwoord op de vraag of er niet een taak ligt, of zou moeten liggen, voor de publieke omroep om als onderdeel van zijn publieke en publiek gefinancierde culturele taak te waarborgen dat audiovisuele makers, die rechtstreeks of door tussenkomst van een producent in opdracht van de publieke omroepen bijdragen leveren aan omroepprogramma's, redelijk worden beloond. |
| Caspers, M., Guibault, L. Baseline report of policies and barriers of TDM in Europe 2016. @techreport{, title = {Baseline report of policies and barriers of TDM in Europe}, author = {M. Caspers and L. Guibault}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1813}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-07-14}, note = { Report for Horizon 2020 project FutureTDM. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| Eskens, S. Annotatie bij EHRM 4 december 2015 (Roman Zakharov/Rusland) Computerrecht, 2016 (3), pp. 178-189, 2016. @article{, title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 4 december 2015 (Roman Zakharov/Rusland)}, author = {Eskens, S.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1801}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-07-01}, journal = {Computerrecht}, volume = {2016}, number = {3}, pages = {178-189}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Eskens, S. Netherlands: New Notification Obligations and Fines under the Dutch Data Protection Act European Data Protection Law Review, 2 (2), pp. 224-226, 2016. @article{, title = {Netherlands: New Notification Obligations and Fines under the Dutch Data Protection Act}, author = {Eskens, S.}, url = {http://edpl.lexxion.eu/article/EDPL/2016/2/12}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-07-01}, journal = {European Data Protection Law Review}, volume = {2}, number = {2}, pages = {224-226}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Arnbak, A. 2016. @book{, title = {Securing Private Communications: Protecting Private Communications Security in EU Law - Fundamental Rights, Functional Value Chains and Market Incentives}, author = {A.M. Arnbak}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1803}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-07-01}, note = { Information Law Series, Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer 2016, 296 pp. ISBN: 9789041167378. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {book} } |
| Irion, K. 2016. @techreport{, title = {Survey and data gathering to support the Impact Assessment of a possible new legislative proposal concerning Directive 2010/13/EU (AVMSD) and in particular the provisions on media freedom, public interest and access for disabled people}, author = {K. Irion}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1798}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-24}, abstract = { The current EU rules on the independence of audiovisual media regulators (Article 30 AVMSD) have little to no impact on the actual performance of regulators, which are under the discretion of MS. […] [E]stablishment of concrete requirements have the largest potential for \emph{de facto }safeguarding independence of regulators and thus more effective transposition of the AVMSD and the preservation of free and pluralistic media. }, note = { Study carried out for the European Commission by Visionary Analytics in cooperation with SQW Limited, Ramboll Management Consulting and with support from the Advisory Board: Dr. K. Irion, M. Ledger, Dr. E. Varney, A. Moledo, Brussels: European Commission, 2016. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } The current EU rules on the independence of audiovisual media regulators (Article 30 AVMSD) have little to no impact on the actual performance of regulators, which are under the discretion of MS. […] [E]stablishment of concrete requirements have the largest potential for de facto safeguarding independence of regulators and thus more effective transposition of the AVMSD and the preservation of free and pluralistic media. |
| Irion, K., Yakovleva, S. The Best of Both Worlds? Free Trade in Services and EU Law on Privacy and Data Protection European Data Protection Law Review, (2), pp. 191-208., 2016, ( Prepublication version of the article. ). @article{, title = {The Best of Both Worlds? Free Trade in Services and EU Law on Privacy and Data Protection}, author = {Yakovleva, S. and Irion, K.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/irion_yakovleva-2016-the-best-of-both-worlds/}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-24}, journal = {European Data Protection Law Review}, number = {2}, pages = {191-208.}, abstract = { The article focuses on the interplay between European Union (EU) law on privacy and data protection and international trade law, in particular the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and the WTO dispute settlement system. The argument distinguishes between the effects of international trade law in the EU legal order on the one hand, and, on the other hand, how EU data protection law would fare in a hypothetical challenge under the GATS. The contribution will apply international trade law and the general exception in GATS Article XIV to typical requirements stemming from EU data protection law, especially on transfers of personal data to third countries. The article enumerates the specific legal risks for defending EU law on privacy and data protection and explains the practical implications of its hypothetical challenge under the GATS. These insights could be useful for the EU’s negotiators of the future bi- or multilateral free trade agreements, notably the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and the Trade in Services Agreement. }, note = { Prepublication version of the article. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } The article focuses on the interplay between European Union (EU) law on privacy and data protection and international trade law, in particular the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and the WTO dispute settlement system. The argument distinguishes between the effects of international trade law in the EU legal order on the one hand, and, on the other hand, how EU data protection law would fare in a hypothetical challenge under the GATS. The contribution will apply international trade law and the general exception in GATS Article XIV to typical requirements stemming from EU data protection law, especially on transfers of personal data to third countries. The article enumerates the specific legal risks for defending EU law on privacy and data protection and explains the practical implications of its hypothetical challenge under the GATS. These insights could be useful for the EU’s negotiators of the future bi- or multilateral free trade agreements, notably the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and the Trade in Services Agreement. |
| Kannekens, E., van Eijk, N. Oneerlijke handelspraktijken: alternatief voor privacyhandhaving Mediaforum, (4), pp. 102-109., 2016. @article{, title = {Oneerlijke handelspraktijken: alternatief voor privacyhandhaving}, author = {E.P.M. Kannekens and N.A.N.M. van Eijk}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1800}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-24}, journal = {Mediaforum}, number = {4}, pages = {102-109.}, abstract = { Privacyhandhaving vindt in Europa vrijwel uitsluitend plaats door nationale privacytoezichthouders. Zij passen primair sectorspecifieke regulering toe gebaseerd op de Europese Privacyrichtlijn.2 De verantwoordelijkheid ligt primair bij de onafhankelijke nationale privacytoezichthouders. In de Verenigde Staten wordt op federaal niveau privacy vooral gehandhaafd door de Federal Trade Commission op basis van algemene regels inzake misleidende en oneerlijke handelspraktijken. In dit artikel wordt het Amerikaanse systeem besproken en naast de Europese kaders gezet. Hieruit blijkt dat ook in Europa de regels over handelspraktijken kunnen worden ingezet voor privacyhandhaving. Er zijn goede argumenten om dit ook te doen: veel fricties betreffen het op markt/consumenten-gericht gebruik van persoonsgegevens. Het ligt dan voor de hand om deze fricties dan ook binnen markt/consument kaders aan de orde te stellen. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Privacyhandhaving vindt in Europa vrijwel uitsluitend plaats door nationale privacytoezichthouders. Zij passen primair sectorspecifieke regulering toe gebaseerd op de Europese Privacyrichtlijn.2 De verantwoordelijkheid ligt primair bij de onafhankelijke nationale privacytoezichthouders. In de Verenigde Staten wordt op federaal niveau privacy vooral gehandhaafd door de Federal Trade Commission op basis van algemene regels inzake misleidende en oneerlijke handelspraktijken. In dit artikel wordt het Amerikaanse systeem besproken en naast de Europese kaders gezet. Hieruit blijkt dat ook in Europa de regels over handelspraktijken kunnen worden ingezet voor privacyhandhaving. Er zijn goede argumenten om dit ook te doen: veel fricties betreffen het op markt/consumenten-gericht gebruik van persoonsgegevens. Het ligt dan voor de hand om deze fricties dan ook binnen markt/consument kaders aan de orde te stellen. |
| Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. 2016. @misc{, title = {Privacy van consumenten}, author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1797}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-23}, note = { In: Handboek consumentenrecht: een overzicht van de rechtspositie van de consument, E.H. Hondius & G.J. Rijken (red.), Zutphen: Paris 2015, p. 483-497. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Poort, J. International Survey on Private Copying WIPO – Thuiskopie 23.06.2016. @misc{Poort2016, title = {International Survey on Private Copying WIPO \textendash Thuiskopie}, author = {Poort, J.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/20160623-International-Conference-on-Private-Copying-Joost-Poort-3.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-23}, abstract = {Presentation "International Survey on Private Copying WIPO \textendash Thuiskopie" at International Conference on Private Copying, Hermitage Amsterdam 23 June 2016}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {presentation} } Presentation "International Survey on Private Copying WIPO – Thuiskopie" at International Conference on Private Copying, Hermitage Amsterdam 23 June 2016 |
| Caspers, M. Deliverable on Regulations and Policies on FutureTDM FutureTDM blog, 2016. @article{Caspers2016f, title = {Deliverable on Regulations and Policies on FutureTDM}, author = {Caspers, M.}, url = {https://www.futuretdm.eu/blog/legal-policies/deliverable-on-regulations-and-policies-on-futuretdm/}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-23}, journal = {FutureTDM blog}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Arnbak, A. Chefsache: Bestuurders aansprakelijk na ernstige cyberaanval 2016. @misc{, title = {Chefsache: Bestuurders aansprakelijk na ernstige cyberaanval}, author = {A.M. Arnbak}, url = {https://axelarnbak.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/FD24.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-17}, note = { Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 16 juni 2016. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Angelopoulos, C., Brody, A., Hins, A., Hugenholtz, P., Margoni, T., McGonagle, T., van Daalen, O., van Hoboken, J. Study of fundamental rights limitations for online enforcement through self-regulation 2016, (Study supported by the Open Society Foundations, 96 pp. ). @techreport{, title = {Study of fundamental rights limitations for online enforcement through self-regulation}, author = {Hins, A. and Hugenholtz, P. and McGonagle, T. and van Daalen, O. and van Hoboken, J. and Angelopoulos, C. and Brody, A. and Margoni, T.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/study_fundamental_rights_limitations.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-16}, note = {Study supported by the Open Society Foundations, 96 pp. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| Benabou, V., Bently, L., Dinwoodie, G., Dusollier, S., Derclaye E., Geiger, C., Griffiths, J., Hugenholtz, P., Kretschmer, M., Metzger, A., Peukert, A., Ricolfi, M., Rognstad, O., Vivant, M., Xalabarder, R. Answer to the EC Consultation on the role of publishers in the copyright value chain 2016. @misc{Hugenholtz2016, title = {Answer to the EC Consultation on the role of publishers in the copyright value chain}, author = {Hugenholtz, P. and Benabou, V. and Derclaye E. and Dinwoodie, G. and Dusollier, S. and Geiger, C. and Griffiths, J. and Kretschmer, M. and Metzger, A. and Peukert, A. and Ricolfi, M. and Rognstad, O. and Vivant, M. and Xalabarder, R. and Bently, L.}, url = {http://ivir00.websites.xs4all.nl/wp-content/uploads/2000/05/235-1-1.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-15}, publisher = {European Copyright Society}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| van Daalen, O. Het Schrems/Facebook-arrest en de gevolgen voor internationale doorgifte Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht, (3), pp. 75-80., 2016. @article{, title = {Het Schrems/Facebook-arrest en de gevolgen voor internationale doorgifte}, author = {O.L. van Daalen}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1787}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-14}, journal = {Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht}, number = {3}, pages = {75-80.}, abstract = { De overdracht van persoonsgegevens naar de Verenigde Staten vond tot voor kort plaats op basis van de zogenoemde Safe Harbourbeschikking. Het Hof heeft die beschikking een paar maanden geleden ongeldig verklaard. Dit is een uitspraak met serieuze gevolgen voor de doorgifte van persoonsgegevens buiten Europa en voor privacybescherming in het algemeen. Wat is de redenering van het Hof van Justitie en wat zijn de gevolgen? }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } De overdracht van persoonsgegevens naar de Verenigde Staten vond tot voor kort plaats op basis van de zogenoemde Safe Harbourbeschikking. Het Hof heeft die beschikking een paar maanden geleden ongeldig verklaard. Dit is een uitspraak met serieuze gevolgen voor de doorgifte van persoonsgegevens buiten Europa en voor privacybescherming in het algemeen. Wat is de redenering van het Hof van Justitie en wat zijn de gevolgen? |
| van Eijk, N. Betere waarborgen voor de werkwijze van inlichtingendiensten Ars Aequi, (juni), pp. 436-439., 2016. @article{, title = {Betere waarborgen voor de werkwijze van inlichtingendiensten}, author = {N.A.N.M. van Eijk}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1788}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-14}, journal = {Ars Aequi}, number = {juni}, pages = {436-439.}, abstract = { Inlichtingendiensten spelen een belangrijke rol bij het waarborgen van de rechtsstaat. Zij zorgen er mede voor dat fundamentele rechten worden gehandhaafd. Tegelijkertijd beschikken deze diensten over bijzondere bevoegdheden waartegenover bijzondere waarborgen moeten staan. In de groeiende informatiesamenleving wordt meer en meer digitale informatie gegenereerd. Informatie waar inlichtingendiensten meer en meer geïnteresseerd in zijn. Dit creëert nieuwe dilemma’s. }, note = { Opinie. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Inlichtingendiensten spelen een belangrijke rol bij het waarborgen van de rechtsstaat. Zij zorgen er mede voor dat fundamentele rechten worden gehandhaafd. Tegelijkertijd beschikken deze diensten over bijzondere bevoegdheden waartegenover bijzondere waarborgen moeten staan. In de groeiende informatiesamenleving wordt meer en meer digitale informatie gegenereerd. Informatie waar inlichtingendiensten meer en meer geïnteresseerd in zijn. Dit creëert nieuwe dilemma’s. |
| van Eijk, N. Ars Aequi, (138), pp. 8013-8014., 2016. @article{, title = {Kroniek Telecommunicatierecht}, author = {N.A.N.M. van Eijk}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1789}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-14}, journal = {Ars Aequi}, number = {138}, pages = {8013-8014.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| van Eijk, N. Ars Aequi, (139), pp. 8077-8078., 2016. @article{, title = {Kroniek Telecommunicatierecht}, author = {N.A.N.M. van Eijk}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1790}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-14}, journal = {Ars Aequi}, number = {139}, pages = {8077-8078.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| van Eijk, N. 'Rechtspraak moet wennen aan nieuwe techniek' De Ingenieur, (juni), pp. 28-30., 2016. @article{, title = {'Rechtspraak moet wennen aan nieuwe techniek'}, author = {N.A.N.M. van Eijk}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1792}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-14}, journal = {De Ingenieur}, number = {juni}, pages = {28-30.}, abstract = { Een voorstel voor een nieuwe ingrijpende afluisterwet zet het privacydebat in Nederland weer op scherp. Maar prof. dr. Nico van Eijk denkt dat rechters het gebruik van gegevens in goede banen zullen leiden. 'Ik ben voorstander van een speciale kamer bij de rechtbank voor aftapverzoeken.' }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Een voorstel voor een nieuwe ingrijpende afluisterwet zet het privacydebat in Nederland weer op scherp. Maar prof. dr. Nico van Eijk denkt dat rechters het gebruik van gegevens in goede banen zullen leiden. 'Ik ben voorstander van een speciale kamer bij de rechtbank voor aftapverzoeken.' |
| Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. European Journal of Migration and Law, (2-3), pp. 259-272., 2016. @article{, title = {Access to Personal Data and the Right to Good Governance during Asylum Procedures after the CJEU's YS. and M. and S. judgment (C-141/12 and C-372/12)}, author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1793}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-14}, journal = {European Journal of Migration and Law}, number = {2-3}, pages = {259-272.}, abstract = { In the YS. and M. and S. judgment, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on three procedures in which Dutch judges asked for clarification on the right of asylum seekers to have access to the documents regarding the decision on asylum applications. The judgment is relevant for interpreting the concept of personal data and the scope of the right of access under the Data Protection Directive, and the right to good administration in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. At first glance, the judgment seems disappointing from the viewpoint of individual rights. Nevertheless, in our view the judgment provides sufficient grounds for effective access rights to the minutes in future asylum cases. }, note = { Case report. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } In the YS. and M. and S. judgment, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on three procedures in which Dutch judges asked for clarification on the right of asylum seekers to have access to the documents regarding the decision on asylum applications. The judgment is relevant for interpreting the concept of personal data and the scope of the right of access under the Data Protection Directive, and the right to good administration in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. At first glance, the judgment seems disappointing from the viewpoint of individual rights. Nevertheless, in our view the judgment provides sufficient grounds for effective access rights to the minutes in future asylum cases. |
| Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. Asiel en Migrantenrecht, (7), 2016. @article{, title = {Inzage in de minuten van de asielprocedure: persoonsgegevens of geen persoonsgegevens? HvJEU, Y.S. en M. en S. tegen Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel (C-141/12 en C-373/12)}, author = {Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1794}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-14}, journal = {Asiel en Migrantenrecht}, number = {7}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. Informed Consent. We Can Do Better to Defend Privacy IEEE Security & Privacy, (2), pp. 103-107., 2016, ( Informed consent as a means to protect privacy is flawed, especially when considering the privacy problems of behavioral targeting. Policymakers should pay more attention to a combined approach that both protects and empowers individuals. ). @article{, title = {Informed Consent. We Can Do Better to Defend Privacy}, author = {Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1795}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-14}, journal = {IEEE Security & Privacy}, number = {2}, pages = {103-107.}, note = { Informed consent as a means to protect privacy is flawed, especially when considering the privacy problems of behavioral targeting. Policymakers should pay more attention to a combined approach that both protects and empowers individuals. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| van Eijk, N. Big data is de hype voorbij: Nieuwe regelgeving leidt tot realistischer beeld 2016. @article{, title = {Big data is de hype voorbij: Nieuwe regelgeving leidt tot realistischer beeld}, author = {N.A.N.M. van Eijk}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1791}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-10}, abstract = { Big data leek een synoniem voor gouden bergen. Maar door nieuwe wetgeving wordt de betekenis ervan behoorlijk genuanceerd. Een betoog over de (on)mogelijkheden van big data aan de hand van de meldplicht datalekken en het gebruik van data door inlichtingen- en veiligheidsdiensten. }, note = { Bijdrage op platform inGovernment - Binnenlands Bestuur. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Big data leek een synoniem voor gouden bergen. Maar door nieuwe wetgeving wordt de betekenis ervan behoorlijk genuanceerd. Een betoog over de (on)mogelijkheden van big data aan de hand van de meldplicht datalekken en het gebruik van data door inlichtingen- en veiligheidsdiensten. |
| Dommering, E. A few legal and economic questions 2016. @misc{, title = {A few legal and economic questions}, author = {E.J. Dommering}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1784}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-09}, abstract = { Over de auteursrechtelijke en economische implicaties van videokunst. }, note = { In: I have a friend who knows someone who bought a video, once. On collecting video art, Milaan: Mousse Publishing 2016, p. 105-109. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Over de auteursrechtelijke en economische implicaties van videokunst. |
| Nieuwenhuis, A. Annotatie bij Hof Amsterdam 9 maart 2016 (strafzaak verbod op groepsbelediging) 2016. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij Hof Amsterdam 9 maart 2016 (strafzaak verbod op groepsbelediging)}, author = {A.J. Nieuwenhuis}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1785}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-09}, journal = {Mediaforum}, number = {3}, pages = {81-84.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. Tijdschrift voor Consumentenrecht en handelspraktijken, (2), pp. 54-66., 2016. @article{, title = {Mensen aanwijzen maar niet bij naam noemen: behavioural targeting, persoonsgegevens en de nieuwe Privacyverordening}, author = {Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/TvCH_2016_2.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-09}, journal = {Tijdschrift voor Consumentenrecht en handelspraktijken}, number = {2}, pages = {54-66.}, abstract = { In Europa is het gegevensbeschermingsrecht het belangrijkste juridische instrument om privacy te beschermen en een behoorlijke omgang met persoonsgegevens te bevorderen. Het gegevensbeschermingsrecht is alleen van toepassing als ‘persoonsgegevens’ verwerkt worden. Er is veel discussie over de vraag of het gegevensbeschermingsrecht van toepassing is als bedrijven gegevens over mensen verwerken maar daar geen naam aan koppelen. Zulke gegevens worden bijvoorbeeld gebruikt voor behavioural targeting. Bij deze marketingtechniek, een vorm van gepersonaliseerde communicatie, volgen bedrijven het gedrag van mensen op het internet, en gebruiken ze de verzamelde informatie om mensen gerichte advertenties te tonen. Deze bijdrage analyseert de discussie over de reikwijdte van het begrip ‘persoonsgegeven’, en trekt twee conclusies. Ten eerste blijkt uit een analyse van het geldende recht, in ieder geval volgens de interpretatie van de Europese privacytoezichthouders, dat de regels voor persoonsgegevens doorgaans van toepassing zijn op behavioural targeting. Ten tweede zouden die regels ook vanuit een normatief perspectief van toepassing moeten zijn. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } In Europa is het gegevensbeschermingsrecht het belangrijkste juridische instrument om privacy te beschermen en een behoorlijke omgang met persoonsgegevens te bevorderen. Het gegevensbeschermingsrecht is alleen van toepassing als ‘persoonsgegevens’ verwerkt worden. Er is veel discussie over de vraag of het gegevensbeschermingsrecht van toepassing is als bedrijven gegevens over mensen verwerken maar daar geen naam aan koppelen. Zulke gegevens worden bijvoorbeeld gebruikt voor behavioural targeting. Bij deze marketingtechniek, een vorm van gepersonaliseerde communicatie, volgen bedrijven het gedrag van mensen op het internet, en gebruiken ze de verzamelde informatie om mensen gerichte advertenties te tonen. Deze bijdrage analyseert de discussie over de reikwijdte van het begrip ‘persoonsgegeven’, en trekt twee conclusies. Ten eerste blijkt uit een analyse van het geldende recht, in ieder geval volgens de interpretatie van de Europese privacytoezichthouders, dat de regels voor persoonsgegevens doorgaans van toepassing zijn op behavioural targeting. Ten tweede zouden die regels ook vanuit een normatief perspectief van toepassing moeten zijn. |
| van Eijk, N. Een normatief toetsingskader voor gegevensverwerking NJB, (22), pp. 1528-1533., 2016. @article{, title = {Een normatief toetsingskader voor gegevensverwerking}, author = {N.A.N.M. van Eijk}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1783}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-03}, journal = {NJB}, number = {22}, pages = {1528-1533.}, abstract = { Aan een zo rijk preadvies als dat van Moerel en Prins kan via een korte bespreking als deze geen recht worden gedaan. Met de proeve van een nieuw toetsingskader voor gegevensverwerking, wordt de vinger op de zere plek gelegd: de bestaande en toekomstige Europese regelgeving schiet te kort: te inflexibel en statisch in een omgeving met hoge dynamiek. Er moet gezocht worden naar een alternatieve, meer normatieve aanpak die recht doet aan de complexiteit van 'big data' en die legitimiteit herstelt. Het voorstel om bij de vraag naar de geoorloofdheid van gegevensverwerking primair de aanwezigheid van een gerechtvaardigd belang uitgangspunt te laten zijn, daagt uit. }, note = { Artikel beschikbaar via Kluwer Navigator. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Aan een zo rijk preadvies als dat van Moerel en Prins kan via een korte bespreking als deze geen recht worden gedaan. Met de proeve van een nieuw toetsingskader voor gegevensverwerking, wordt de vinger op de zere plek gelegd: de bestaande en toekomstige Europese regelgeving schiet te kort: te inflexibel en statisch in een omgeving met hoge dynamiek. Er moet gezocht worden naar een alternatieve, meer normatieve aanpak die recht doet aan de complexiteit van 'big data' en die legitimiteit herstelt. Het voorstel om bij de vraag naar de geoorloofdheid van gegevensverwerking primair de aanwezigheid van een gerechtvaardigd belang uitgangspunt te laten zijn, daagt uit. |
| Breemen, J., Breemen, V. KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi, 139 , pp. 8075-8077, 2016, ISSN: 2212-5205-3. @article{Breemen2016b, title = {Kroniek Mediarecht}, author = {Breemen, J. and Breemen, V. }, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/kwartaalsignaal-139-mediarecht.pdf}, issn = {2212-5205-3}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-01}, journal = {KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi}, volume = {139}, pages = {8075-8077}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. 2016. @periodical{, title = {Op zoek naar de risicoburger}, author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1782}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-05-27}, abstract = { Om afwijkend gedrag bij burgers te herkennen, koppelt de overheid allerlei gegevens uit haar databases en laat er analyses op los. Wat betekent dat voor de relatie tussen burger en die overheid? }, note = { Trouw, De Verdieping, 27 mei 2016, p. 2. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {periodical} } Om afwijkend gedrag bij burgers te herkennen, koppelt de overheid allerlei gegevens uit haar databases en laat er analyses op los. Wat betekent dat voor de relatie tussen burger en die overheid? |
| Hins, A. Ondeugdelijke bronnen en aansprakelijkheid 2016. @misc{, title = {Ondeugdelijke bronnen en aansprakelijkheid}, author = {A.W. Hins}, url = {http://www.tidm.nl/tidm/index.php/jnmblogpost/ondeugdelijke-bronnen-en-aansprakelijkheid/}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-05-26}, abstract = { Een journalist die klakkeloos afgaat op zijn bronnen kan stevig afgaan. Dat blijkt uit een vonnis van de Amsterdamse rechtbank van 13 april 2016, gewezen in de zaak van een Japans bedrijf tegen AVROTROS en twee journalisten. }, note = { Bijdrage aan webblog Journalistiek en Nieuwe Media van de Universiteit Leiden. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Een journalist die klakkeloos afgaat op zijn bronnen kan stevig afgaan. Dat blijkt uit een vonnis van de Amsterdamse rechtbank van 13 april 2016, gewezen in de zaak van een Japans bedrijf tegen AVROTROS en twee journalisten. |
| Eskens, S., Kool, L., Timmer, J., Van Est, R. Rathenau Instituut 2016. @techreport{, title = {Beyond control: Exploratory study on the discourse in Silicon Valley about consumer privacy in the Internet of Things}, author = {Eskens, S. and Timmer, J. and Kool, L. and Van Est, R.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1780}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-05-26}, institution = {Rathenau Instituut}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| Helberger, N., Trilling, D. Facebook is a news editor: the real issues to be concerned about 2016. @misc{, title = {Facebook is a news editor: the real issues to be concerned about}, author = {D. Trilling and N. Helberger}, url = {http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mediapolicyproject/2016/05/26/facebook-is-a-news-editor-the-real-issues-to-be-concerned-about/}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-05-26}, abstract = { Facebook's use of human editors may bring comfort to some, but there are wider issues to do with editorial responsibility that need to be addressed. }, note = { LSE blog, 26 May 2016. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Facebook's use of human editors may bring comfort to some, but there are wider issues to do with editorial responsibility that need to be addressed. |
| Arnbak, A. Nieuw toezicht: Stortvloed aan data schreeuwt om ingrijpen 2016. @misc{, title = {Nieuw toezicht: Stortvloed aan data schreeuwt om ingrijpen}, author = {A.M. Arnbak}, url = {https://axelarnbak.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/FD23.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-05-20}, note = { Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 19 mei 2016. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Kabel, J. Doemdenken? Annotatie bij Rb. Amsterdam 21 maart 2016 (Van Huut / CRI Residence Amstelveen) 2016. @misc{, title = {Doemdenken? Annotatie bij Rb. Amsterdam 21 maart 2016 (Van Huut / CRI Residence Amstelveen)}, author = {J.J.C. Kabel}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1773}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-05-19}, journal = {AMI}, number = {2}, pages = {31-35.}, abstract = { Tegen totale vernietiging van de door eiser ontworpen gevel van gebouw De Bovenlanden kan de architect zich niet met een beroep op zijn persoonlijkheidsrechten verzetten. Nu de eigenaar een zwaarwegend belang heeft bij de transformatie van het gebouw is er ook geen sprake van misbruik van recht. Vordering tot verbod van sloop en transformatie van het gebouw afgewezen. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Tegen totale vernietiging van de door eiser ontworpen gevel van gebouw De Bovenlanden kan de architect zich niet met een beroep op zijn persoonlijkheidsrechten verzetten. Nu de eigenaar een zwaarwegend belang heeft bij de transformatie van het gebouw is er ook geen sprake van misbruik van recht. Vordering tot verbod van sloop en transformatie van het gebouw afgewezen. |
| Kabel, J. Annotatie bij Rb. Rotterdam 23 december 2015 (X / Interlynx) 2016. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij Rb. Rotterdam 23 december 2015 (X / Interlynx)}, author = {J.J.C. Kabel}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1774}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-05-19}, journal = {AMI}, number = {2}, pages = {49-50.}, abstract = { Bewijslevering makerschap door eisende auteur tegenover naamsvermelding in de zin van artikel 8 van gedaagde. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Bewijslevering makerschap door eisende auteur tegenover naamsvermelding in de zin van artikel 8 van gedaagde. |
| van Eechoud, M. AMI, (2), pp. 25-30., 2016. @article{, title = {De ontsporing van het begrip databank. Enige bedenkingen bij HvJEU Freistaat Beieren / Verlag Esterbauer}, author = {M.M.M. van Eechoud}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1775}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-05-19}, journal = {AMI}, number = {2}, pages = {25-30.}, abstract = { Het Hof van Justitie heeft bij de uitleg van Richtlijn 96/9/EG betreffende de rechtsbescherming van databanken het begrip 'databank' zelden onder een vergrootglas gelegd. Meer aandacht ging uit naar het vereiste van substantile investering en naar de reikwijdte van het recht om opvraging en hergebruik van data te verbieden. Nu ligt er een uitspraak die het criterium dat de gegevensverzameling uit zelfstandige elementen moet bestaan, uitholt. Gaan we naar een databankrecht op alle 'informatie'? }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Het Hof van Justitie heeft bij de uitleg van Richtlijn 96/9/EG betreffende de rechtsbescherming van databanken het begrip 'databank' zelden onder een vergrootglas gelegd. Meer aandacht ging uit naar het vereiste van substantile investering en naar de reikwijdte van het recht om opvraging en hergebruik van data te verbieden. Nu ligt er een uitspraak die het criterium dat de gegevensverzameling uit zelfstandige elementen moet bestaan, uitholt. Gaan we naar een databankrecht op alle 'informatie'? |
| Hugenholtz, P. 2016. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 7 maart 2014 (Staat der Nederlanden / NORMA e.a.), Hof van Justitie van de EU 10 april 2014 (ACI Adam e.a. / Stichting de Thuiskopie en Stichting Onderhandelingen Thuiskopie vergoeding), Hof van Justitie van de EU 5 maart 2015 (Copydan Br{a}ndkopi / Nokia Danmark)}, author = {P.B. Hugenholtz}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1776}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-05-19}, journal = {NJ}, number = {16/17}, pages = {2384-2388.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| van der Sloot, B. Introduction of Special Issue: Privacy, ethics and information technology Ethics and Information Technology Journal, (1), pp. 1-7., 2016, ( Also guest editor of this special issue of <em>Ethics and Information Technology Journal.</em> ). @article{, title = {Introduction of Special Issue: Privacy, ethics and information technology}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1765}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-05-13}, journal = {Ethics and Information Technology Journal}, number = {1}, pages = {1-7.}, note = { Also guest editor of this special issue of <em>Ethics and Information Technology Journal.</em> }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| van der Sloot, B. European Data Protection Law Review, (1), pp. 1-10., 2016. @article{, title = {Editorial}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1766}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-05-13}, journal = {European Data Protection Law Review}, number = {1}, pages = {1-10.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| van der Sloot, B. Ars Aequi, (april), pp. 248-252., 2016, ( Opinie. ). @article{, title = {Machtsstrijd over persoonsgegevens: De zaak Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner van het Europees Hof van Justitie}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1767}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-05-13}, journal = {Ars Aequi}, number = {april}, pages = {248-252.}, abstract = { Op 6 oktober 2015 heeft het Hof van Justitie van de Europese Unie uitspraak gedaan in de zaak Maximillian Schrems tegen Data Protection Commissioner. De zaak betrof de legitimiteit van de doorvoer van persoonsgegevens van Europese burgers naar landen buiten de EU, in het bijzonder de Verenigde Staten. De Richtlijn bescherming persoonsgegevens stelt dat persoonsgegevens alleen naar derde landen mogen worden doorgevoerd als daar een passend beschermingsniveau wordt gewaarborgd. De Europese Commissie had in een beschikking vastgesteld dat de Verenigde Staten inderdaad een dergelijk beschermingsniveau kent. Het Hof van Justitie heeft deze beschikking echter ongeldig verklaard. }, note = { Opinie. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Op 6 oktober 2015 heeft het Hof van Justitie van de Europese Unie uitspraak gedaan in de zaak Maximillian Schrems tegen Data Protection Commissioner. De zaak betrof de legitimiteit van de doorvoer van persoonsgegevens van Europese burgers naar landen buiten de EU, in het bijzonder de Verenigde Staten. De Richtlijn bescherming persoonsgegevens stelt dat persoonsgegevens alleen naar derde landen mogen worden doorgevoerd als daar een passend beschermingsniveau wordt gewaarborgd. De Europese Commissie had in een beschikking vastgesteld dat de Verenigde Staten inderdaad een dergelijk beschermingsniveau kent. Het Hof van Justitie heeft deze beschikking echter ongeldig verklaard. |
| van der Sloot, B. Annotatie bij EHRM 22 december 2015 (G.S.B. / Zwitersland) 2016. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 22 december 2015 (G.S.B. / Zwitersland)}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1768}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-05-13}, journal = {European Human Rights Cases}, number = {4}, abstract = { Een man met de Saudische en Amerikaanse nationaliteit zet een deel van zijn geld op een bank (UBS) in Zwitserland. Hij denkt daar veilig te zijn, in verband met het bankgeheim. De Amerikaanse belastingdienst krijgt echter een tip dat UBS veel rekeninghouders heeft die hun bezittingen niet opgeven aan de belastingdienst. De Amerikaanse justitie wil UBS vervolgen voor medeplichtigheid aan belastingontduiking. Er wordt een schikking getroffen en de autoriteiten vragen UBS gegevens over de rekeninghouders vrij te geven. Vervolgens mengt Zwitserland zich in het verhaal en er wordt een internationale overeenkomst tussen beide landen gesloten, waarbij er in Zwitserland een taskforce komt die zal beoordelen of en zo ja welke informatie er aan de Amerikaanse autoriteiten mag worden doorgespeeld. Als de informatie van G.S.B. vervolgens dreigt te worden overgedragen komt deze in het geweer. In de nationale procedure wordt hij eerst in het gelijk gesteld, maar nadat er verdere maatregelen zijn getroffen verliest hij de zaak alsnog. Ook door het EHRM wordt zijn klacht onder art. 8 EVRM afgewezen. Hierbij speelt met name de vraag of de veroordeling is voorgeschreven bij wet, aangezien de internationale overeenkomst met terugwerkende kracht lijkt te zijn toegepast. Dit argument wordt echter verworpen door het Hof. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Een man met de Saudische en Amerikaanse nationaliteit zet een deel van zijn geld op een bank (UBS) in Zwitserland. Hij denkt daar veilig te zijn, in verband met het bankgeheim. De Amerikaanse belastingdienst krijgt echter een tip dat UBS veel rekeninghouders heeft die hun bezittingen niet opgeven aan de belastingdienst. De Amerikaanse justitie wil UBS vervolgen voor medeplichtigheid aan belastingontduiking. Er wordt een schikking getroffen en de autoriteiten vragen UBS gegevens over de rekeninghouders vrij te geven. Vervolgens mengt Zwitserland zich in het verhaal en er wordt een internationale overeenkomst tussen beide landen gesloten, waarbij er in Zwitserland een taskforce komt die zal beoordelen of en zo ja welke informatie er aan de Amerikaanse autoriteiten mag worden doorgespeeld. Als de informatie van G.S.B. vervolgens dreigt te worden overgedragen komt deze in het geweer. In de nationale procedure wordt hij eerst in het gelijk gesteld, maar nadat er verdere maatregelen zijn getroffen verliest hij de zaak alsnog. Ook door het EHRM wordt zijn klacht onder art. 8 EVRM afgewezen. Hierbij speelt met name de vraag of de veroordeling is voorgeschreven bij wet, aangezien de internationale overeenkomst met terugwerkende kracht lijkt te zijn toegepast. Dit argument wordt echter verworpen door het Hof. |
| Brakel, R. van, Broeders, D., Schrijvers, E., van der Sloot, B. Big Data in een vrije en veilige samenleving 2016, ( WRR-rapport, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam 2016.<br /> ISBN: 9789462983571. ). @techreport{, title = {Big Data in een vrije en veilige samenleving}, author = {Broeders, D. and Schrijvers, E. and Brakel, R. van and van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1769}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-05-13}, abstract = { De wrr analyseert in dit rapport hoe de Nederlandse overheid Big Data op een verantwoorde wijze kan gebruiken. Het rapport richt zich specifiek op (Big) Dataanalyses door politie en justitie, de inlichtingen- en veiligheidsdiensten en verschillende organisaties en samenwerkingsverbanden op het gebied van fraudebestrijding. Big Data biedt zeker kansen voor opsporing en surveillance, maar vraagt tevens om sterkere waarborgen voor de vrijheidsrechten van burgers. Het zwaartepunt in de huidige juridische regelgeving ligt op de regulering van het verzamelen van data. De wrr pleit ervoor dat die bestaande wetgeving wordt aangevuld met de regulering van en het toezicht op de fases van de analyse en het gebruik van Big Data. }, note = { WRR-rapport, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam 2016.<br /> ISBN: 9789462983571. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } De wrr analyseert in dit rapport hoe de Nederlandse overheid Big Data op een verantwoorde wijze kan gebruiken. Het rapport richt zich specifiek op (Big) Dataanalyses door politie en justitie, de inlichtingen- en veiligheidsdiensten en verschillende organisaties en samenwerkingsverbanden op het gebied van fraudebestrijding. Big Data biedt zeker kansen voor opsporing en surveillance, maar vraagt tevens om sterkere waarborgen voor de vrijheidsrechten van burgers. Het zwaartepunt in de huidige juridische regelgeving ligt op de regulering van het verzamelen van data. De wrr pleit ervoor dat die bestaande wetgeving wordt aangevuld met de regulering van en het toezicht op de fases van de analyse en het gebruik van Big Data. |
| Dommering, E. Annotatie bij EHRM 11 maart 2014 (Jelsevar e.a./ Slovenië) 2016. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 11 maart 2014 (Jelsevar e.a./ Sloveni\"{e})}, author = {E.J. Dommering}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1770}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-05-13}, journal = {NJ}, number = {16/17}, abstract = { Klacht naar aanleiding van roman waarin klagers hun familie en moeder herkenden. Afweging door nationale rechter tussen persoonlijkheidsrechten en artistieke vrijheid redelijk. Belang artistieke vrijheid en getuigenverklaringen. Kennelijk ongegrond en niet-ontvankelijk. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Klacht naar aanleiding van roman waarin klagers hun familie en moeder herkenden. Afweging door nationale rechter tussen persoonlijkheidsrechten en artistieke vrijheid redelijk. Belang artistieke vrijheid en getuigenverklaringen. Kennelijk ongegrond en niet-ontvankelijk. |
| van Eijk, N. Nieuw toezicht op inlichtingendiensten gebrekkig 2016. @misc{, title = {Nieuw toezicht op inlichtingendiensten gebrekkig}, author = {N.A.N.M. van Eijk}, url = {http://njb.nl/blog/nieuw-toezicht-op-inlichtingendiensten-gebrekkig.19716.lynkx}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-05-13}, note = { NJBlog, 10 mei 2016. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| McGonagle, T. Villamedia, (mei), pp. 24-27., 2016. @article{McGonagle2016, title = {Persvrijheidsmonitor 2015}, author = {McGonagle, T.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/artikel_Persvrijheidsmonitor_2015.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-05-13}, journal = {Villamedia}, number = {mei}, pages = {24-27.}, abstract = { In 2015 scoorde Nederland weer goed op de internationale persvrijheidsranglijst. Toch zijn er aandachtspunten. Zo beperkte de overheid in 2015 geregeld de feitelijke toegang tot het nieuws, bijvoorbeeld door bij Wob-verzoeken veel informatie weg te lakken, en zelfs door journalisten te weren bij inspraakavonden over de huisvesting van vluchtelingen. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } In 2015 scoorde Nederland weer goed op de internationale persvrijheidsranglijst. Toch zijn er aandachtspunten. Zo beperkte de overheid in 2015 geregeld de feitelijke toegang tot het nieuws, bijvoorbeeld door bij Wob-verzoeken veel informatie weg te lakken, en zelfs door journalisten te weren bij inspraakavonden over de huisvesting van vluchtelingen. |
| van der Sloot, B. The Individual in the Big Data Era: Moving towards an Agent-Based Privacy Paradigm 2016, ( In: <em>Exploring the boundaries of Big Data</em>, B. van der Sloot, D. Broeders & E. Schrijvers (eds.), Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam 2016, pp. 177-203. ). @misc{, title = {The Individual in the Big Data Era: Moving towards an Agent-Based Privacy Paradigm}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1762}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-05-12}, note = { In: <em>Exploring the boundaries of Big Data</em>, B. van der Sloot, D. Broeders & E. Schrijvers (eds.), Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam 2016, pp. 177-203. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Broeders, D., Schrijvers, E., van der Sloot, B. Introduction: Exploring the Boundaries of Big Data 2016, ( In:<em> Exploring the boundaries of Big Data</em>, B. van der Sloot, D. Broeders & E. Schrijvers (eds.), Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam 2016, pp. 11-23. ). @misc{, title = {Introduction: Exploring the Boundaries of Big Data}, author = {Broeders, D. and Schrijvers, E. and van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1763}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-05-12}, note = { In:<em> Exploring the boundaries of Big Data</em>, B. van der Sloot, D. Broeders & E. Schrijvers (eds.), Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam 2016, pp. 11-23. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Broeders, D., Schrijvers, E., van der Sloot, B. Exploring the boundaries of Big Data 2016, ( Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam 2016, 286 pp.<br /> ISBN: 9789462983588. ). @techreport{, title = {Exploring the boundaries of Big Data}, author = {Broeders, D. and Schrijvers, E. and van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1764}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-05-12}, note = { Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam 2016, 286 pp.<br /> ISBN: 9789462983588. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| Schendel, S. van, van der Sloot, B. International and comparative legal study on Big Data 2016, ISBN: 9789490186296, (WRR-rapport, working paper 20.). @misc{vanderSloot2016, title = {International and comparative legal study on Big Data}, author = {van der Sloot, B. and Schendel, S. van }, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/international_and_comparative_legal_study_on_big_data/}, isbn = {9789490186296}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-05-12}, abstract = {Working Paper 20 was written as part of the project ‘Big Data, Privacy and Security’, undertaken by the Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy (wrr) to investigate the consequences of the use of Big Data in the domain of security. This background study, entitled International and Comparative Legal Study on Big Data, was written by Bart van der Sloot and Sacha van Schendel. Many countries experiment with Big Data processes, which are almost by definition transnational. The first part of the study is a quick scan of the Big Data policies, legislation and regulations in Australia, Brazil, China, France, Germany, India, Israel, Japan, South-Africa, the United Kingdom and the United States. The second part presents the findings of a survey among Data Protection Authorities (dpas) in Europe. Both parts of the study focus on the relations between Big Data, security and privacy.}, note = {WRR-rapport, working paper 20.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Working Paper 20 was written as part of the project ‘Big Data, Privacy and Security’, undertaken by the Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy (wrr) to investigate the consequences of the use of Big Data in the domain of security. This background study, entitled International and Comparative Legal Study on Big Data, was written by Bart van der Sloot and Sacha van Schendel. Many countries experiment with Big Data processes, which are almost by definition transnational. The first part of the study is a quick scan of the Big Data policies, legislation and regulations in Australia, Brazil, China, France, Germany, India, Israel, Japan, South-Africa, the United Kingdom and the United States. The second part presents the findings of a survey among Data Protection Authorities (dpas) in Europe. Both parts of the study focus on the relations between Big Data, security and privacy. |
| Caspers, M. Why a Copyright Exception Should Go Beyond TDM FutureTDM blog, 2016. @article{Caspers2016g, title = {Why a Copyright Exception Should Go Beyond TDM}, author = {Caspers, M.}, url = {https://www.futuretdm.eu/blog/legal-policies/copyright-exception-tdm/}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-05-02}, journal = {FutureTDM blog}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Arnbak, A. Privacy en veiligheid in Europa 2016. @book{, title = {Privacy en veiligheid in Europa}, author = {A.M. Arnbak}, url = {https://axelarnbak.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/FD22.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-04-21}, note = { Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 21 april 2016. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {book} } |
| Caspers, M. Neighbouring Rights, Publishers, and a TDM Exception FutureTDM blog, 2016. @article{Caspers2016h, title = {Neighbouring Rights, Publishers, and a TDM Exception}, author = {Caspers, M.}, url = {https://www.futuretdm.eu/blog/legal-policies/neighbouring-rights-publishers-tdm-exception/}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-04-21}, journal = {FutureTDM blog}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Hugenholtz, P. Say Nay to the Neighbouring Right! Kluwer Copyright Blog 2016, (Kluwer Copyright Blog, 14 April 2016). @online{Hugenholtz2016b, title = {Say Nay to the Neighbouring Right!}, author = {Hugenholtz, P.}, url = {http://kluwercopyrightblog.com/2016/04/14/say-nay-to-the-neighbouring-right/}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-04-14}, organization = {Kluwer Copyright Blog}, note = {Kluwer Copyright Blog, 14 April 2016}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {online} } |
| Irion, K. The Reform of the e-Privacy Directive: How to get it right? 08.04.2016, ( Presentation delivered at the public conference organized by the Greens/EFA, 6 April 2016, European Parliament, Brussels. ). @misc{, title = {The Reform of the e-Privacy Directive: How to get it right?}, author = {Irion, K.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1758.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-04-08}, note = { Presentation delivered at the public conference organized by the Greens/EFA, 6 April 2016, European Parliament, Brussels. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {presentation} } |
| Bodó, B., Helberger, N., Möller, J., Trilling, D., Vreese, C.H. de, Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. Should we worry about filter bubbles? Internet Policy Review, 5 (1), 2016. @article{Borgesius2016, title = {Should we worry about filter bubbles?}, author = {Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. and Trilling, D. and Moller, J. and Bod\'{o}, B. and Vreese, C.H. de and Helberger, N.}, url = {http://policyreview.info/node/401/pdf}, doi = {10.14763/2016.1.401}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-04-01}, journal = {Internet Policy Review}, volume = {5}, number = {1}, abstract = { Some fear that personalised communication can lead to information cocoons or filter bubbles. For instance, a personalised news website could give more prominence to conservative or liberal media items, based on the (assumed) political interests of the user. As a result, users may encounter only a limited range of political ideas. We synthesise empirical research on the extent and effects of self-selected personalisation, where people actively choose which content they receive, and pre-selected personalisation, where algorithms personalise content for users without any deliberate user choice. We conclude that at present there is little empirical evidence that warrants any worries about filter bubbles. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Some fear that personalised communication can lead to information cocoons or filter bubbles. For instance, a personalised news website could give more prominence to conservative or liberal media items, based on the (assumed) political interests of the user. As a result, users may encounter only a limited range of political ideas. We synthesise empirical research on the extent and effects of self-selected personalisation, where people actively choose which content they receive, and pre-selected personalisation, where algorithms personalise content for users without any deliberate user choice. We conclude that at present there is little empirical evidence that warrants any worries about filter bubbles. |
| Nieuwenhuis, A. Kunst en belediging: sleutelroman en karikatuur Mediaforum, (1), pp. 2-11., 2016. @article{, title = {Kunst en belediging: sleutelroman en karikatuur}, author = {A.J. Nieuwenhuis}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1757.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-04-01}, journal = {Mediaforum}, number = {1}, pages = {2-11.}, abstract = { Personen kunnen ernstig 'beledigd' zijn, wanneer ze zichzelf in een karikatuur of in een sleutelroman herkennen. Het is dan de vraag in hoeverre het artistieke karakter van de publicatie relevant is. Deze bijdrage tracht die vraag te beantwoorden door een onderzoek naar de jurisprudentie van het EHRM, van de Duitse rechter en van de Nederlandse rechter. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Personen kunnen ernstig 'beledigd' zijn, wanneer ze zichzelf in een karikatuur of in een sleutelroman herkennen. Het is dan de vraag in hoeverre het artistieke karakter van de publicatie relevant is. Deze bijdrage tracht die vraag te beantwoorden door een onderzoek naar de jurisprudentie van het EHRM, van de Duitse rechter en van de Nederlandse rechter. |
| Helberger, N. Profiling and targeting in the Internet of Things - A new challenge for consumer protection 2016, ( In: <em>Digital Revolution: Challenges for Contract Law in Practice</em>, R. Schulze & D. Staudenmayer (eds.), Baden Baden: Nomos, p. 135-161. ). @misc{, title = {Profiling and targeting in the Internet of Things - A new challenge for consumer protection}, author = {Helberger, N.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1747.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-03-31}, note = { In: <em>Digital Revolution: Challenges for Contract Law in Practice</em>, R. Schulze & D. Staudenmayer (eds.), Baden Baden: Nomos, p. 135-161. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Breemen, J., Breemen, V. KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi, (138), pp. 8012-8013., 2016. @article{, title = {Kroniek Mediarecht}, author = {Breemen, J. and Breemen, V.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1751.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-03-31}, journal = {KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi}, number = {138}, pages = {8012-8013.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Eskens, S. University of Amsterdam, 2016. @mastersthesis{, title = {Profiling the European Citizen in the Internet of Things: How Will the General Data Protection Regulation Apply to this Form of Personal Data Processing, and How Should It?}, author = {Eskens, S. }, url = {http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2752010}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-03-29}, school = {University of Amsterdam}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {mastersthesis} } |
| Sax, M. Big data: Finders keepers, losers weepers? Ethics and Information Technology, 18 (1), pp. 25-31, 2016. @article{Sax2016, title = {Big data: Finders keepers, losers weepers?}, author = {Sax, M.}, url = {http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10676-016-9394-0}, doi = {10.1007/s10676-016-9394-0}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-03-26}, journal = {Ethics and Information Technology}, volume = {18}, number = {1}, pages = {25-31}, abstract = {This article argues that big data’s entrepreneurial potential is based not only on new technological developments that allow for the extraction of non-trivial, new insights out of existing data, but also on an ethical judgment that often remains implicit: namely the ethical judgment that those companies that generate these new insights can legitimately appropriate (the fruits of) these insights. As a result, the business model of big data companies is essentially founded on a libertarian-inspired ‘finders, keepers’ ethic. The article argues, next, that this presupposed ‘finder, keepers’ ethic is far from unproblematic and relies itself on multiple unconvincing assumptions. This leads to the conclusion that the conduct of companies working with big data might lack ethical justification.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This article argues that big data’s entrepreneurial potential is based not only on new technological developments that allow for the extraction of non-trivial, new insights out of existing data, but also on an ethical judgment that often remains implicit: namely the ethical judgment that those companies that generate these new insights can legitimately appropriate (the fruits of) these insights. As a result, the business model of big data companies is essentially founded on a libertarian-inspired ‘finders, keepers’ ethic. The article argues, next, that this presupposed ‘finder, keepers’ ethic is far from unproblematic and relies itself on multiple unconvincing assumptions. This leads to the conclusion that the conduct of companies working with big data might lack ethical justification. |
| Velze, S.C. van 2016. @techreport{, title = {Communication to a New Public? A Critical Analysis of the CJEU's 'New Public' Criterion in European Copyright Law}, author = {Velze, S.C. van}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1744.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-03-24}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| Arnbak, A. Katalysator die privacy volwassen maakt 2016. @misc{, title = {Katalysator die privacy volwassen maakt}, author = {A.M. Arnbak}, url = {https://axelarnbak.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/FD21.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-03-24}, note = { Column in Het Financieele Dagbladvan 24 maart 2016. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Irion, K., McGonagle, T., van Eijk, N. Smart TV and data protection - Introduction 2016. @techreport{, title = {Smart TV and data protection - Introduction}, author = {N.A.N.M. van Eijk and K. Irion and T. McGonagle}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1742.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-03-10}, abstract = { The structure of this study is built around the following questions: - What is smart TV? - How does smart TV compare with other forms of audiovisual media? - What regulatory frameworks govern smart TV? - What guidance can be found in selected country-specific case studies? - What are the dangers associated with the collection, storage and processing of private user information by commercial parties? - How are relevant regulatory frameworks likely to evolve? Samsung have warned owners of their smart TVs that the system’s voice recognition could actually be recording and sharing their private conversations. This “bad buzz” comes at a time when Brussels is in the process of adopting new legislation – the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - aimed at protecting us from abuse and misuse of our private data and consumer behaviour big data collected by smart equipment such as television sets. The European Audiovisual Observatory, part of the Council of Europe in Strasbourg, is keeping track of these developments and has published this IRIS Special report entitled "Smart TV and data protection". This is a joint publication by the Observatory and partner institution, the Dutch Institute for Information Law (IViR in Amsterdam). It inspired an expert workshop organised in Strasbourg December 2015, which looked at “the grey areas between media regulation and data protection”. }, note = { IRIS Special, European Audvisual Observatory, Strasbourg 2016. ISBN 9789287182395. See here for more information and ability to purchase publication. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } The structure of this study is built around the following questions: - What is smart TV? - How does smart TV compare with other forms of audiovisual media? - What regulatory frameworks govern smart TV? - What guidance can be found in selected country-specific case studies? - What are the dangers associated with the collection, storage and processing of private user information by commercial parties? - How are relevant regulatory frameworks likely to evolve? Samsung have warned owners of their smart TVs that the system’s voice recognition could actually be recording and sharing their private conversations. This “bad buzz” comes at a time when Brussels is in the process of adopting new legislation – the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - aimed at protecting us from abuse and misuse of our private data and consumer behaviour big data collected by smart equipment such as television sets. The European Audiovisual Observatory, part of the Council of Europe in Strasbourg, is keeping track of these developments and has published this IRIS Special report entitled "Smart TV and data protection". This is a joint publication by the Observatory and partner institution, the Dutch Institute for Information Law (IViR in Amsterdam). It inspired an expert workshop organised in Strasbourg December 2015, which looked at “the grey areas between media regulation and data protection”. |
| Kerste, M., Poort, J., Witteman, J. 2016. @techreport{, title = {Quick Scan Reserveprijs DVB-T}, author = {M. Kerste and J. Witteman and J.P. Poort}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1743.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-03-10}, abstract = { Op basis van een Quick Scan van internationale veilinguitkomsten en openbare cijfers over de huidige vergunninghouder adviseert SEO/IViR om bij de veiling van de vergunning voor DVB-T ten hoogste een low but non-trivial reserveprijs, van bijvoorbeeld €1 miljoen, vast te stellen. KPN/Digitenne en NPO zijn momenteel de vergunninghouders in Nederland voor DVB-T, en maken daarvoor gebruik van de UHF-band (470-790 MHz). De huidige vergunningen hebben een looptijd van 15 jaar en lopen op 31 januari 2017 af. De Minister van Economische Zaken is verantwoordelijk voor de verdeling van het spectrum en is voornemens de frequenties voor commercieel gebruik vanaf mei 2016 te gaan veilen. De nieuwe vergunning zal dan ingaan op 1 februari 2017 en een looptijd hebben van 13 jaar. Teneinde het verloop van de veiling te versnellen en niet-serieuze aanvragers te weren overweegt de minister bij de veiling een reserveprijs te hanteren vanaf waar het biedingsproces zal aanvangen. Het ministerie van Economische Zaken heeft SEO gevraagd om gegeven de voorgenomen uitgangspunten en het veilingmodel, een Quick Scan uit te voeren naar de mogelijke invulling van een reserveprijs. Het onderzoeksrapport is onderdeel van de consultatie die het ministerie van Economische Zaken heeft uitgezet. Meer informatie is te vinden op: https://www.internetconsultatie.nl/veiling_frequenties_dvbt }, note = { SEO-rapport nr. 2016-05, in opdracht van het Ministerie van Economische Zaken, Amsterdam, februari 2016. ISBN: 9789067338011. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } Op basis van een Quick Scan van internationale veilinguitkomsten en openbare cijfers over de huidige vergunninghouder adviseert SEO/IViR om bij de veiling van de vergunning voor DVB-T ten hoogste een low but non-trivial reserveprijs, van bijvoorbeeld €1 miljoen, vast te stellen. KPN/Digitenne en NPO zijn momenteel de vergunninghouders in Nederland voor DVB-T, en maken daarvoor gebruik van de UHF-band (470-790 MHz). De huidige vergunningen hebben een looptijd van 15 jaar en lopen op 31 januari 2017 af. De Minister van Economische Zaken is verantwoordelijk voor de verdeling van het spectrum en is voornemens de frequenties voor commercieel gebruik vanaf mei 2016 te gaan veilen. De nieuwe vergunning zal dan ingaan op 1 februari 2017 en een looptijd hebben van 13 jaar. Teneinde het verloop van de veiling te versnellen en niet-serieuze aanvragers te weren overweegt de minister bij de veiling een reserveprijs te hanteren vanaf waar het biedingsproces zal aanvangen. Het ministerie van Economische Zaken heeft SEO gevraagd om gegeven de voorgenomen uitgangspunten en het veilingmodel, een Quick Scan uit te voeren naar de mogelijke invulling van een reserveprijs. Het onderzoeksrapport is onderdeel van de consultatie die het ministerie van Economische Zaken heeft uitgezet. Meer informatie is te vinden op: https://www.internetconsultatie.nl/veiling_frequenties_dvbt |
| Arnbak, A. Zwarte markt: Speltheorie in plaats van recht en ethiek 2016. @misc{, title = {Zwarte markt: Speltheorie in plaats van recht en ethiek}, author = {A.M. Arnbak}, url = {https://www.axelarnbak.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/FD17.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-03-08}, note = { Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 2 december 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Arnbak, A. Blockchain: Recht en cultuur bepalen succes fintech 2016. @misc{, title = {Blockchain: Recht en cultuur bepalen succes fintech}, author = {A.M. Arnbak}, url = {https://www.axelarnbak.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/fd18.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-03-08}, note = { Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 30 december 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Arnbak, A. Datamining: Tussen technologie en democratie bij verkiezingen 2016. @misc{, title = {Datamining: Tussen technologie en democratie bij verkiezingen}, author = {A.M. Arnbak}, url = {https://www.axelarnbak.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/fd19.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-03-08}, note = { Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 28 januari 2016. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Arnbak, A. FBI vs Apple: Gevecht om de macht woedt in digitale wereld 2016. @misc{, title = {FBI vs Apple: Gevecht om de macht woedt in digitale wereld}, author = {A.M. Arnbak}, url = {https://www.axelarnbak.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/fd20.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-03-08}, note = { Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 25 februari 2016. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Dommering, E. 2016. @misc{, title = {Het meningloze tijdperk}, author = {E.J. Dommering}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1737.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-03-01}, abstract = { Bijdrage over de vrijheid van meningsuiting in het populistische tijdperk. }, note = { Verschenen in: Zonder tegenspraak, nr. 30, E. Lievens (red.), feestbundel Dirk Voorhoof, Brugge: die Keure Professional Publishing 2016, p. 74-79. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Bijdrage over de vrijheid van meningsuiting in het populistische tijdperk. |
| Hviid, M., Schroff, S., Street, J. Regulating CMOs by competition: an incomplete answer to the licensing problem? CREATe Working Paper Series, 2016/03 , pp. 1- 31, 2016. @article{Hviid2016, title = {Regulating CMOs by competition: an incomplete answer to the licensing problem?}, author = {Hviid, M. and Schroff, S. and Street, J.}, url = {http://www.create.ac.uk/publications/regulating-cmos-by-competition-an-incomplete-answer-to-the-licensing-problem/}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-03-01}, journal = {CREATe Working Paper Series}, volume = {2016/03}, pages = {1- 31}, abstract = {While the three functions of Collective Management Organisations \textendash to licence use, monitor use, and to collect and distribute the revenue \textendash have traditionally been accepted as leading to a natural (national) monopoly, digital exploitation of music may no longer support such a conclusion. The European Commission has challenged the traditional structures through reforms that increase the degree of competition. This paper asks whether the reforms have had the desired effect and shows, through qualitative research, that at least as regards the streaming of music, competition has not delivered. Part of the reason for this may be that the services required by the now competing CMOs have changed.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } While the three functions of Collective Management Organisations – to licence use, monitor use, and to collect and distribute the revenue – have traditionally been accepted as leading to a natural (national) monopoly, digital exploitation of music may no longer support such a conclusion. The European Commission has challenged the traditional structures through reforms that increase the degree of competition. This paper asks whether the reforms have had the desired effect and shows, through qualitative research, that at least as regards the streaming of music, competition has not delivered. Part of the reason for this may be that the services required by the now competing CMOs have changed. |
| Hins, A. Poolse toestanden bij de publieke omroep? 2016. @misc{, title = {Poolse toestanden bij de publieke omroep?}, author = {A.W. Hins}, url = {http://www.montesquieu-instituut.nl/9353000/1/j9vvj72dlowskug/vk1lndlx21yn?pk_campaign=hofv-1602&pk_kwd=vk1lndlx21yn}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-02-29}, note = { Bijdrage aan de nieuwsbrief 'De Hofvijver' van het Montesquieu Instituut. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Hugenholtz, P. Towards Author's Paradise: The new Dutch Act on Authors' Contracts 2016. @misc{, title = {Towards Author's Paradise: The new Dutch Act on Authors' Contracts}, author = {P.B. Hugenholtz}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1729.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-02-25}, note = { In: Liber Amicorum Jan Rosén, G. Karnell, A. Kur, P-J. Nordell, J. Axhamn, S. Carlsson (ed.), eddy.se ab, Visby 2016, p. 397- 407. ISBN: 9789185333660. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| McGonagle, T. Annotatie bij EHRM 20 oktober 2015 (Pentikäinen / Finland) 2016. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 20 oktober 2015 (Pentik\"{a}inen / Finland)}, author = {T. McGonagle}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1730.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-02-25}, journal = {European Human Rights Cases}, number = {3}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Hins, A. EHRM geeft voorrang aan bescherming van persoonsgegevens 2016. @misc{, title = {EHRM geeft voorrang aan bescherming van persoonsgegevens}, author = {A.W. Hins}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1731.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-02-25}, journal = {Mediaforum}, number = {1}, pages = {19-21.}, note = { Annotatie bij EHRM 21 juli 2015 (Satamedia / Finland). }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Hins, A. Zo'n huisbezoek is niet zo onschuldig als het lijkt 2016. @periodical{, title = {Zo'n huisbezoek is niet zo onschuldig als het lijkt}, author = {A.W. Hins}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1732.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-02-25}, note = { Opinie in NRC Handelsblad van 23 januari 2016. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {periodical} } |
| Irion, K. A special regard: The Court of Justice and the fundamental rights to privacy and data protection Faber, (Ed.): Nomos, 2016, ( In: Festschrift für Wolfhard Kohte, Faber et al (eds.), Baden-Baden: Nomos, forthcoming 2016. ). @inbook{, title = {A special regard: The Court of Justice and the fundamental rights to privacy and data protection}, author = {Irion, K.}, editor = {Faber}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/irion_a-special-regard_chapterfinal/}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-02-25}, publisher = {Nomos}, abstract = {The frequency with which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rules on the interpretations of the rights to privacy and data protection in European Union (EU) law is constantly accelerating. The increasing case-load can certainly be attributed to the contemporary relevance of these issues in a data-driven society which leads to more cases being referred to the CJEU. However, contrary to earlier case-law, which had a rather limited effect, the recent CJEU decisions have gained prominence for their principle contribution to EU law. In 2014, the Court issued a landmark ruling in the case \emph{Digital Rights Ireland and Seitlinger v Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources} which catapulted EU citizens’ privacy and data protection rights from the margins of EU law to the center stage. Already in 2015, in the case \emph{Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner}, the Court has had another occasion to review EU legislation for its compliance with the rights to privacy and data protection under the EU Charter. The invalidation of the EU-U.S. Safe Harbour agreement by the Court has been stirring a global resonance in addition to receiving ample and arguably controversial coverage in international news. This contribution looks at how the fundamental rights to privacy and data protection are protected in the EU legal order. It primarily assesses the CJEU’s case-law’s trajectory in this field as well as the impact of its decision practice in EU law. Hereby I discuss whether the CJEU holds a particular regard for the rights to privacy and data protection since the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (CFR) was accorded binding legal value in 2009.5 Particular focus is given to the discussion of the two judgments in 2014 and 2015 cited above with which the Court underscored its determination to effectively protect these fundamental rights in the scope of EU law.}, note = { In: Festschrift f\"{u}r Wolfhard Kohte, Faber et al (eds.), Baden-Baden: Nomos, forthcoming 2016. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {inbook} } The frequency with which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rules on the interpretations of the rights to privacy and data protection in European Union (EU) law is constantly accelerating. The increasing case-load can certainly be attributed to the contemporary relevance of these issues in a data-driven society which leads to more cases being referred to the CJEU. However, contrary to earlier case-law, which had a rather limited effect, the recent CJEU decisions have gained prominence for their principle contribution to EU law. In 2014, the Court issued a landmark ruling in the case Digital Rights Ireland and Seitlinger v Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources which catapulted EU citizens’ privacy and data protection rights from the margins of EU law to the center stage. Already in 2015, in the case Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner, the Court has had another occasion to review EU legislation for its compliance with the rights to privacy and data protection under the EU Charter. The invalidation of the EU-U.S. Safe Harbour agreement by the Court has been stirring a global resonance in addition to receiving ample and arguably controversial coverage in international news. This contribution looks at how the fundamental rights to privacy and data protection are protected in the EU legal order. It primarily assesses the CJEU’s case-law’s trajectory in this field as well as the impact of its decision practice in EU law. Hereby I discuss whether the CJEU holds a particular regard for the rights to privacy and data protection since the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (CFR) was accorded binding legal value in 2009.5 Particular focus is given to the discussion of the two judgments in 2014 and 2015 cited above with which the Court underscored its determination to effectively protect these fundamental rights in the scope of EU law. |
| van Eechoud, M. Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie 22 januari 2015 (Allposters / Pictoright) AMI, (6), pp. 169-173., 2016. @article{, title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie 22 januari 2015 (Allposters / Pictoright)}, author = {van Eechoud, M.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1735.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-02-25}, journal = {AMI}, number = {6}, pages = {169-173.}, abstract = { Overbrenging van de afbeelding van een beschermd werk van een papieren poster op canvas valt onder het distributierecht van art. 4 Auteursrechtrichtlijn 2001/29/EG. Poortvliet-doctrine. Geen sprake van uitputting als drager is vervangen. Beloning voor distributie moet in een redelijke verhouding staan tot de economische waarde van de exploitatie van het beschermde voorwerp. Auteursrechtrichtlijn harmoniseert niet het recht van bewerking. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Overbrenging van de afbeelding van een beschermd werk van een papieren poster op canvas valt onder het distributierecht van art. 4 Auteursrechtrichtlijn 2001/29/EG. Poortvliet-doctrine. Geen sprake van uitputting als drager is vervangen. Beloning voor distributie moet in een redelijke verhouding staan tot de economische waarde van de exploitatie van het beschermde voorwerp. Auteursrechtrichtlijn harmoniseert niet het recht van bewerking. |
| Poort, J. Billijke vergoeding in recht en economie AMI, (6), pp. 157-161., 2016. @article{, title = {Billijke vergoeding in recht en economie}, author = {J.P. Poort}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1736.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-02-25}, journal = {AMI}, number = {6}, pages = {157-161.}, abstract = { Op 2 oktober 2013 wees de Rechtbank Den Haag vonnis in de zaak van SENA tegen 25 organisatoren van ‘dance events’ over de billijke vergoeding die zij aan SENA verschuldigd zijn voor het draaien van muziekopnames. Hoger beroep dient bij het Haagse Gerechtshof, dat de zaak naar verwachting voor advies zal verwijzen naar de Geschillencommissie Auteursrecht. Niet eerder liet een Nederlandse rechter zich expliciet uit over de hoogte van de billijke vergoeding en nu de billijke vergoeding voor auteurs ook in het nieuwe auteurscontractenrecht een centrale rol speelt, rijst de vraag hoe zo’n vergoeding kan worden bepaald. Economen kunnen wel wat zeggen over welvaartseffecten van vergoedingen, maar rekenen vragen over billijkheid tot het domein van politiek en recht. Ook in het recht blijken er echter nauwelijks aanknopingspunten te zijn om dit concept concreet te maken. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Op 2 oktober 2013 wees de Rechtbank Den Haag vonnis in de zaak van SENA tegen 25 organisatoren van ‘dance events’ over de billijke vergoeding die zij aan SENA verschuldigd zijn voor het draaien van muziekopnames. Hoger beroep dient bij het Haagse Gerechtshof, dat de zaak naar verwachting voor advies zal verwijzen naar de Geschillencommissie Auteursrecht. Niet eerder liet een Nederlandse rechter zich expliciet uit over de hoogte van de billijke vergoeding en nu de billijke vergoeding voor auteurs ook in het nieuwe auteurscontractenrecht een centrale rol speelt, rijst de vraag hoe zo’n vergoeding kan worden bepaald. Economen kunnen wel wat zeggen over welvaartseffecten van vergoedingen, maar rekenen vragen over billijkheid tot het domein van politiek en recht. Ook in het recht blijken er echter nauwelijks aanknopingspunten te zijn om dit concept concreet te maken. |
| Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. Computer Law & Security Review, (2), pp. 256-271., 2016. @article{, title = {Singling out people without knowing their names - Behavioural targeting, pseudonymous data, and the new data protection regulation}, author = {Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.}, url = {http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2733115}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-02-23}, journal = {Computer Law & Security Review}, number = {2}, pages = {256-271.}, abstract = { Information about millions of people is collected for behavioural targeting, a type of marketing that involves tracking people’s online behaviour for targeted advertising. It is hotly debated whether data protection law applies to behavioural targeting. Many behavioural targeting companies say that, as long as they do not tie names to data they hold about individuals, they do not process any personal data, and that, therefore, data protection law does not apply to them. European Data Protection Authorities, however, take the view that a company processes personal data if it uses data to single out a person, even if it cannot tie a name to these data. This paper argues that data protection law should indeed apply to behavioural targeting. Companies can often tie a name to nameless data about individuals. Furthermore, behavioural targeting relies on collecting information about individuals, singling out individuals, and targeting ads to individuals. Many privacy risks remain, regardless of whether companies tie a name to the information they hold about a person. A name is merely one of the identifiers that can be tied to data about a person, and it is not even the most practical identifier for behavioural targeting. Seeing data used to single out a person as personal data fits the rationale for data protection law: protecting fairness and privacy. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Information about millions of people is collected for behavioural targeting, a type of marketing that involves tracking people’s online behaviour for targeted advertising. It is hotly debated whether data protection law applies to behavioural targeting. Many behavioural targeting companies say that, as long as they do not tie names to data they hold about individuals, they do not process any personal data, and that, therefore, data protection law does not apply to them. European Data Protection Authorities, however, take the view that a company processes personal data if it uses data to single out a person, even if it cannot tie a name to these data. This paper argues that data protection law should indeed apply to behavioural targeting. Companies can often tie a name to nameless data about individuals. Furthermore, behavioural targeting relies on collecting information about individuals, singling out individuals, and targeting ads to individuals. Many privacy risks remain, regardless of whether companies tie a name to the information they hold about a person. A name is merely one of the identifiers that can be tied to data about a person, and it is not even the most practical identifier for behavioural targeting. Seeing data used to single out a person as personal data fits the rationale for data protection law: protecting fairness and privacy. |
| Caspers, M. FutureTDM is Mapping the Legal Barriers to TDM in Europe FutureTDM blog, 2016. @article{Caspers2016i, title = {FutureTDM is Mapping the Legal Barriers to TDM in Europe}, author = {Caspers, M.}, url = {https://www.futuretdm.eu/blog/legal-policies/title-template-10/}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-02-19}, journal = {FutureTDM blog}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| van Eijk, N. Bijdrage Rondetafelgesprek 11 februari 2016: Computercriminaliteit III 18.02.2016. @misc{, title = {Bijdrage Rondetafelgesprek 11 februari 2016: Computercriminaliteit III}, author = {N.A.N.M. van Eijk}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1726.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-02-18}, note = { Bijdrage aan Rondetafelgesprek 11 februari 2016, Computercriminaliteit III, Vaste commissie voor Veiligheid en Justitie. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {presentation} } |
| van Eijk, N. "Onafhankelijkheid publieke omroep moet beter worden geborgd" 2016. @misc{, title = {"Onafhankelijkheid publieke omroep moet beter worden geborgd"}, author = {N.A.N.M. van Eijk}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1727.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-02-18}, journal = {Broadcast Magazine}, number = {2}, pages = {46-47.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Kabel, J. IE vincit omnia? Opsporing in de particuliere sector. 2016. @misc{, title = {IE vincit omnia? Opsporing in de particuliere sector.}, author = {J.J.C. Kabel}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1724.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-02-16}, journal = {AMI}, number = {6}, pages = {176-180.}, abstract = { Bevel aan Google tot afgifte ex. art. 28 lid 9 Aw van persoons- en adresgegevens van de houder van een Google Play account vanwege onrechtmatige verkoop van e-books. Voorwaarde dat de houder op grond van art. 40 Wbp verzet kan aantekenen tegen die afgifte bij de verantwoordelijke (Google). Grondrechtenconflict bescherming van eigendom, vrijheid van meningsuiting en privacy. }, note = { Annotatie bij Vzr. Rb. Den Haag 5 oktober 2015 en 6 november 2015 (Stichting Brein / Google). }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Bevel aan Google tot afgifte ex. art. 28 lid 9 Aw van persoons- en adresgegevens van de houder van een Google Play account vanwege onrechtmatige verkoop van e-books. Voorwaarde dat de houder op grond van art. 40 Wbp verzet kan aantekenen tegen die afgifte bij de verantwoordelijke (Google). Grondrechtenconflict bescherming van eigendom, vrijheid van meningsuiting en privacy. |
| Kabel, J. Het prinsesje onder de grondrechten 2016. @misc{, title = {Het prinsesje onder de grondrechten}, author = {J.J.C. Kabel}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1725.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-02-16}, journal = {Privacy & Informatie}, number = {6}, pages = {215.}, note = { Redactioneel. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Guibault, L. Individual Licensing Models and Consumer Protection 2016, ( In: <em>Exploring Sensible Ways for Paying Copyright Owners?</em>, R.M. Hilty & K.-C. Liu (eds.), Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer 2016, forthcoming. ). @misc{, title = {Individual Licensing Models and Consumer Protection}, author = {Guibault, L.}, url = {http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2713765}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-02-05}, abstract = { Copyright law is not primarily directed at consumers. Their interests are therefore only marginally accounted for, as the copyright rules exempt specific uses of works from the right holder’s control. This chapter examines the impact of digital technology on the position of consumers of licensed copyrighted content. While ownership of the physical embodiment of a work does not entail the ownership of the rights in the work, how does copyright law deal with ‘disembodied’ works? Whereas digital content is now commonly distributed on the basis of individual licensing schemes, what does it mean for consumers? Do they have a claim under consumer protection law against copyright owners for the impossibility to make a copy for private purposes, the lack of interoperability between devices, and the geo-blocking of their account? }, note = { In: <em>Exploring Sensible Ways for Paying Copyright Owners?</em>, R.M. Hilty & K.-C. Liu (eds.), Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer 2016, forthcoming. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Copyright law is not primarily directed at consumers. Their interests are therefore only marginally accounted for, as the copyright rules exempt specific uses of works from the right holder’s control. This chapter examines the impact of digital technology on the position of consumers of licensed copyrighted content. While ownership of the physical embodiment of a work does not entail the ownership of the rights in the work, how does copyright law deal with ‘disembodied’ works? Whereas digital content is now commonly distributed on the basis of individual licensing schemes, what does it mean for consumers? Do they have a claim under consumer protection law against copyright owners for the impossibility to make a copy for private purposes, the lack of interoperability between devices, and the geo-blocking of their account? |
| Bertoni, A., Favale, M., Schroff, S. Requirements for Diligent Search in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Italy EnDOW (1-48), 2016. @techreport{Favale2016, title = {Requirements for Diligent Search in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Italy}, author = {Favale, M. and Schroff, S. and Bertoni, A.}, url = {http://diligentsearch.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Deliverable1-1-Diligent-Search3Countries.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-29}, number = {1-48}, institution = {EnDOW}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| Caspers, M. The Role of Anne Frank's Diary and Academic Freedom for Text and Data Mining FutureTDM blog, 2016. @article{Caspers2016j, title = {The Role of Anne Frank's Diary and Academic Freedom for Text and Data Mining}, author = {Caspers, M.}, url = {https://www.futuretdm.eu/blog/legal-policies/role-anne-franks-diary-academic-freedom-text-data-mining/}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-21}, journal = {FutureTDM blog}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Caspers, M. The role of Anne Frank’s diary and academic freedom for text & data mining 2016, visited: 20.01.2016, (Post on Kluwer Copyright Blog). @online{Caspers2016b, title = {The role of Anne Frank’s diary and academic freedom for text & data mining}, author = {Caspers, M.}, url = {http://kluwercopyrightblog.com/2016/01/20/the-role-of-anne-franks-diary-and-academic-freedom-for-text-data-mining/}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-20}, urldate = {2016-01-20}, note = {Post on Kluwer Copyright Blog}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {online} } |
| Hijmans, H., Kranenborg, H. Data protection anno 2014: How to restore trust? An introduction 2016. @misc{, title = {Data protection anno 2014: How to restore trust? An introduction}, author = {H. Kranenborg and H. Hijmans}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1717.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-19}, note = { In: Data protection anno 2014: How to restore trust? Contributions in honour of Peter Hustinx, European Data Protection Supervisor (2004-2014), H. Hijmans & H. Kranenborg (eds.), Cambridge: Intersentia 2014, p. 3-18. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Hijmans, H. Right to have links removed: Evidence of effective data protection Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, (3), pp. 555-563., 2016. @article{, title = {Right to have links removed: Evidence of effective data protection}, author = {H. Hijmans}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1718.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-19}, journal = {Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law}, number = {3}, pages = {555-563.}, note = { Case C-131/12 Google v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja Gonzalez, Judgment of 13 May 2014. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Hijmans, H. On private persons monitoring the public space 2016. @misc{, title = {On private persons monitoring the public space}, author = {H. Hijmans}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1719.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-19}, journal = {European Data Protection Law Review}, number = {2}, pages = {1-4.}, note = { Case C-212/13, František Ryneš v Ú\v{r}ad pro ochranu osobních údajr{u}, Judgment of 11 December 2014, Opinion Advocate General Jääskinen of 10 July 2014. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| van der Sloot, B. Welcome to the Jungle: the Liability of Internet Intermediaries for Privacy Violations in Europe JIPITEC, (3), pp. 211-228., 2016. @article{, title = {Welcome to the Jungle: the Liability of Internet Intermediaries for Privacy Violations in Europe}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1720.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-19}, journal = {JIPITEC}, number = {3}, pages = {211-228.}, abstract = { In Europe, roughly three regimes apply to the liability of Internet intermediaries for privacy violations conducted by users through their network. These are: the e-Commerce Directive, which, under certain conditions, excludes them from liability; the Data Protection Directive, which imposes a number of duties and responsibilities on providers processing personal data; and the freedom of expression, contained inter alia in the ECHR, which, under certain conditions, grants Internet providers several privileges and freedoms. Each doctrine has its own field of application, but they also have partial overlap. In practice, this creates legal inequality and uncertainty, especially with regard to providers that host online platforms and process User Generated Content. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } In Europe, roughly three regimes apply to the liability of Internet intermediaries for privacy violations conducted by users through their network. These are: the e-Commerce Directive, which, under certain conditions, excludes them from liability; the Data Protection Directive, which imposes a number of duties and responsibilities on providers processing personal data; and the freedom of expression, contained inter alia in the ECHR, which, under certain conditions, grants Internet providers several privileges and freedoms. Each doctrine has its own field of application, but they also have partial overlap. In practice, this creates legal inequality and uncertainty, especially with regard to providers that host online platforms and process User Generated Content. |
| van Hoboken, J., Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. Scoping Electronic Communication Privacy Rules: Data, Services and Values JIPITEC, (3), pp. 198-210., 2016. @article{, title = {Scoping Electronic Communication Privacy Rules: Data, Services and Values}, author = {van Hoboken, J. and Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1721.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-19}, journal = {JIPITEC}, number = {3}, pages = {198-210.}, abstract = { We use electronic communication networks for more than simply traditional telecommunications: we access the news, buy goods online, file our taxes, contribute to public debate, and more. As a result, a wider array of privacy interests is implicated for users of electronic communications networks and services. . This development calls into question the scope of electronic communications privacy rules. This paper analyses the scope of these rules, taking into account the rationale and the historic background of the European electronic communications privacy framework. We develop a framework for analysing the scope of electronic communications privacy rules using three approaches: (i) a service-centric approach, (ii) a data-centric approach, and (iii) a value-centric approach. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. The current e-Privacy Directive contains a complex blend of the three approaches, which does not seem to be based on a thorough analysis of their strengths and weaknesses. The upcoming review of the directive announced by the European Commission provides an opportunity to improve the scoping of the rules. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } We use electronic communication networks for more than simply traditional telecommunications: we access the news, buy goods online, file our taxes, contribute to public debate, and more. As a result, a wider array of privacy interests is implicated for users of electronic communications networks and services. . This development calls into question the scope of electronic communications privacy rules. This paper analyses the scope of these rules, taking into account the rationale and the historic background of the European electronic communications privacy framework. We develop a framework for analysing the scope of electronic communications privacy rules using three approaches: (i) a service-centric approach, (ii) a data-centric approach, and (iii) a value-centric approach. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. The current e-Privacy Directive contains a complex blend of the three approaches, which does not seem to be based on a thorough analysis of their strengths and weaknesses. The upcoming review of the directive announced by the European Commission provides an opportunity to improve the scoping of the rules. |
| Guibault, L. Cultural Heritage Online? Settle it in the Country of Origin of the Work JIPITEC, (3), pp. 173-191., 2016. @article{, title = {Cultural Heritage Online? Settle it in the Country of Origin of the Work}, author = {Guibault, L.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1722.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-19}, journal = {JIPITEC}, number = {3}, pages = {173-191.}, abstract = { This article examines the conditions under which a system of extended collective licensing (ECL) for the use of works contained in the collections of cultural heritage institutions (CHIs) participating in Europeana could function within a cross-border basis. ECL is understood as a form of collective rights management whereby the application of freely negotiated copyright licensing agreements between a user and a collective management organisation (“CMO”), is extended by law to non-members of the organisation. ECL regimes have already been put in place in a few Member States and so far, all have the ability to apply only on a national basis. This article proposes a mechanism that would allow works licensed under an ECL system in one territory of the European Union to be made available in all the territories of the Union. The proposal rests on the statutory recognition of the “country of origin” principle, as necessary and sufficient territory for the negotiation and application of an ECL solution for the rights clearance of works contained in the collection of a cultural heritage institution, including orphan works. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This article examines the conditions under which a system of extended collective licensing (ECL) for the use of works contained in the collections of cultural heritage institutions (CHIs) participating in Europeana could function within a cross-border basis. ECL is understood as a form of collective rights management whereby the application of freely negotiated copyright licensing agreements between a user and a collective management organisation (“CMO”), is extended by law to non-members of the organisation. ECL regimes have already been put in place in a few Member States and so far, all have the ability to apply only on a national basis. This article proposes a mechanism that would allow works licensed under an ECL system in one territory of the European Union to be made available in all the territories of the Union. The proposal rests on the statutory recognition of the “country of origin” principle, as necessary and sufficient territory for the negotiation and application of an ECL solution for the rights clearance of works contained in the collection of a cultural heritage institution, including orphan works. |
2016. @book{, title = {Forfatterskap i TV-drama: Showrunnermodellen, one vision - og Kampen for tilv\aerelsen (Authorship in TV Drama: The Showrunner Model, One Vision - and the Struggle for Survival)}, url = {https://www.idunn.no/forfatterskap-i-tv-drama}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-15}, note = { Universitetsforlaget, University of Bergen, 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {book} } |
| Biron, L., Cooper, E. Authorship, Aesthetics and the Artworld: Reforming Copyright's Joint Authorship Doctrine Law and Philosophy, (1), pp. 55-85., 2016. @article{, title = {Authorship, Aesthetics and the Artworld: Reforming Copyright's Joint Authorship Doctrine}, author = {L. Biron and E. Cooper}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1715.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-15}, journal = {Law and Philosophy}, number = {1}, pages = {55-85.}, abstract = { This article considers the extent to which insights from the philosophy of art can assist copyright law in identifying the author or authors of works to which many have contributed. In doing so, it looks to institutional theories of art, which go beyond a simple bifurcation of ‘author’ and ‘work’, and focus instead on broader determinants of an art work’s production, such as the ‘artworld’. It puts forward a framework focusing on three components of authorship supported by these theories: role, authority and intention. The paper then draws attention to some important challenges that this framework raises for copyright law’s joint authorship doctrine in the UK and USA, and suggests some ways in which copyright law might be reformed, so as to allow copyright to retain its own benchmarks while also bringing conceptions of authorship in law and art closer together. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This article considers the extent to which insights from the philosophy of art can assist copyright law in identifying the author or authors of works to which many have contributed. In doing so, it looks to institutional theories of art, which go beyond a simple bifurcation of ‘author’ and ‘work’, and focus instead on broader determinants of an art work’s production, such as the ‘artworld’. It puts forward a framework focusing on three components of authorship supported by these theories: role, authority and intention. The paper then draws attention to some important challenges that this framework raises for copyright law’s joint authorship doctrine in the UK and USA, and suggests some ways in which copyright law might be reformed, so as to allow copyright to retain its own benchmarks while also bringing conceptions of authorship in law and art closer together. |
| Nieuwenhuis, A. Ars Aequi, (1), pp. 21-24., 2016. @article{, title = {De geschonden majesteit}, author = {A.J. Nieuwenhuis}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1716.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-15}, journal = {Ars Aequi}, number = {1}, pages = {21-24.}, abstract = { Sinds 1830 is in Nederland de majesteitsschennis strafbaar; met enige regelmaat vinden er ook vervolgingen plaats. Hieronder wordt de vraag gesteld of een dergelijk delict in een moderne democratie wel bestaansrecht heeft. De vraag wordt beantwoord door aandacht te besteden aan de rechtsgoederen die een verbod van belediging kan beschermen, aan de verhouding tussen vrijheid van meningsuiting en democratie, aan de onschendbaarheid van de koning, en aan de ontwikkeling van het positieve recht. }, note = { Opinie }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Sinds 1830 is in Nederland de majesteitsschennis strafbaar; met enige regelmaat vinden er ook vervolgingen plaats. Hieronder wordt de vraag gesteld of een dergelijk delict in een moderne democratie wel bestaansrecht heeft. De vraag wordt beantwoord door aandacht te besteden aan de rechtsgoederen die een verbod van belediging kan beschermen, aan de verhouding tussen vrijheid van meningsuiting en democratie, aan de onschendbaarheid van de koning, en aan de ontwikkeling van het positieve recht. |
| Hins, A. Annotatie bij EHRM 13 oktober 2015 (Bremner / Turkije) 2016. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 13 oktober 2015 (Bremner / Turkije)}, author = {A.W. Hins}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1704.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-14}, journal = {European Human Rights Cases}, number = {1}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| van der Sloot, B. Annotatie bij EHRM 21 juli 2015 (Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy & Satamedia Oy / Finland) 2016. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 21 juli 2015 (Satakunnan Markkinap\"{o}rssi Oy & Satamedia Oy / Finland)}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1705.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-14}, journal = {European Human Rights Cases}, number = {1}, abstract = { In Finland is de belastinginformatie over burgers openbaar. Twee Finse bedrijven besluiten daar gebruik van te maken. Het ene publiceert delen van de informatie in een magazine, het andere runt een SMS-dienst, waarbij op naam informatie omtrent belastingen kan worden opgevraagd over derde personen. De vraag is of dit rechtmatig is. De nationale procedure is hieromtrent niet eenduidig. Er worden prejudici\"{e}le vragen gesteld aan het Hof van Justitie. Dit antwoordt dat de bedrijfsactiviteiten hebben te gelden als een verwerking van persoonsgegevens onder de Richtlijn bescherming persoonsgegevens, maar stelt tevens dat de bedrijven mogelijkerwijs een beroep kunnen doen op de in de richtlijn vervatte journalistieke exceptie. De Finse autoriteiten oordelen echter anders en wegen het recht op vrijheid van meningsuiting van de bedrijven tegen het recht op privacy van de burgers, waarbij het tweede belang zwaarder weegt. De bedrijven stappen naar het Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens. Dat laat dit oordeel in stand. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } In Finland is de belastinginformatie over burgers openbaar. Twee Finse bedrijven besluiten daar gebruik van te maken. Het ene publiceert delen van de informatie in een magazine, het andere runt een SMS-dienst, waarbij op naam informatie omtrent belastingen kan worden opgevraagd over derde personen. De vraag is of dit rechtmatig is. De nationale procedure is hieromtrent niet eenduidig. Er worden prejudiciële vragen gesteld aan het Hof van Justitie. Dit antwoordt dat de bedrijfsactiviteiten hebben te gelden als een verwerking van persoonsgegevens onder de Richtlijn bescherming persoonsgegevens, maar stelt tevens dat de bedrijven mogelijkerwijs een beroep kunnen doen op de in de richtlijn vervatte journalistieke exceptie. De Finse autoriteiten oordelen echter anders en wegen het recht op vrijheid van meningsuiting van de bedrijven tegen het recht op privacy van de burgers, waarbij het tweede belang zwaarder weegt. De bedrijven stappen naar het Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens. Dat laat dit oordeel in stand. |
| McGonagle, T. Journalistieke bronbescherming blijft een aandachtspunt Villamedia, pp. 52-56., 2016. @article{, title = {Journalistieke bronbescherming blijft een aandachtspunt}, author = {T. McGonagle}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1706.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-14}, journal = {Villamedia}, pages = {52-56.}, abstract = { Net als ieder jaar scoort Nederland goed op de persvrijheidsranglijst. Op het put van de journalistieke bronbescherming lopen we internationaal gezien echter nog altijd uit de pas. We hebben nog steeds geen wettelijke regeling. Najaar 2014 werd een wetsvoorstel openbaar. Maar na kritiek uit de mediabranche ligt het wetgevingsproces nu stil. Dit en meer in de Persvrijheidsmonitor over 2014. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Net als ieder jaar scoort Nederland goed op de persvrijheidsranglijst. Op het put van de journalistieke bronbescherming lopen we internationaal gezien echter nog altijd uit de pas. We hebben nog steeds geen wettelijke regeling. Najaar 2014 werd een wetsvoorstel openbaar. Maar na kritiek uit de mediabranche ligt het wetgevingsproces nu stil. Dit en meer in de Persvrijheidsmonitor over 2014. |
| McGonagle, T. Freedom of expression: still a precondition for democracy? 2016. @techreport{, title = {Freedom of expression: still a precondition for democracy?}, author = {T. McGonagle}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1707.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-14}, note = { Conference Report, Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2015, 24 pp. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| Fahy, R., Gelevert, H., Nooren, P., Stokking, H., Til, H. van, van Eijk, N. Digital platforms: an analytical framework for identifying and evaluating policy options 2016, ( TNO-rapport 2015, R11271. Bijlage bij Kamerbrief over toekomstbestendige wetgeving. ). @techreport{Til2016, title = {Digital platforms: an analytical framework for identifying and evaluating policy options}, author = {Til, H. van and Nooren, P. and Stokking, H. and Gelevert, H. and van Eijk, N. and Fahy, R.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1703.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-07}, abstract = { Kader om beleidsopties ten aanzien van 'digitale platforms' te analyseren.}, note = { TNO-rapport 2015, R11271. Bijlage bij Kamerbrief over toekomstbestendige wetgeving. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } Kader om beleidsopties ten aanzien van 'digitale platforms' te analyseren. |
| Fahy, R., Gelevert, H., Nooren, P., Stokking, H., Til, H. van, van Eijk, N. Digitale Platforms: een analytisch kader voor het identificeren en evalueren van beleidsopties 2016. @techreport{Til2016b, title = {Digitale Platforms: een analytisch kader voor het identificeren en evalueren van beleidsopties}, author = {Til, H. van and Nooren, P. and Stokking, H. and Gelevert, H. and van Eijk, N. and Fahy, R.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/digitale-platforms_tno-1.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-07}, abstract = {Nederlandse samenvatting van rapport "Digital platforms: an analytical framework for identifying and evaluating policy options". }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } Nederlandse samenvatting van rapport "Digital platforms: an analytical framework for identifying and evaluating policy options". |
| Helberger, N. Enkele reflecties op de Europese platform consultatie 2016. @misc{, title = {Enkele reflecties op de Europese platform consultatie}, author = {N. Helberger}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1756.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-05}, journal = {Mediaforum}, number = {1}, pages = {1.}, note = { Opinie. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Bastian, M., Medeiros, D., Trilling, D. Talking with and about politicians on Twitter. An analysis of tweets containing @-mentions of candidates in the Brazilian presidential elections Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública, (6), pp. 89-115, 2016. @article{Medeiros2016, title = {Talking with and about politicians on Twitter. An analysis of tweets containing @-mentions of candidates in the Brazilian presidential elections}, author = {Medeiros, D. and Bastian, M. and Trilling, D.}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-01}, journal = {Revista Latinoamericana de Opini\'{o}n P\'{u}blica}, number = {6}, pages = {89-115}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Bastian, M., Fengler, S. Transparenz und Medien: Perspektiven der Kommunikationswissenschaft – Schnittstellen für die Politologie Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 26 (2), pp. 211-220, 2016. @article{Bastian2016, title = {Transparenz und Medien: Perspektiven der Kommunikationswissenschaft \textendash Schnittstellen f\"{u}r die Politologie}, author = {Bastian, M. and Fengler, S.}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-01}, journal = {Zeitschrift f\"{u}r Politikwissenschaft}, volume = {26}, number = {2}, pages = {211-220}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Bastian, M. Einstellungen von Jugendlichen mit Migrationshintergrund zum Journalistenberuf Pöttker, H; Kiesewetter, C; Lofink, J (Ed.): Migranten als Journalisten? Eine Studie zu Berufsperspektiven in der Einwanderungsgesellschaft, pp. 128-137, Pöttker, H. and Kiesewetter, C. and Lofink, J. (eds): Migranten als Journalisten? Eine Studie zu Berufsperspektiven in der Einwanderungsgesellschaft. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, 2016. @inbook{Bastian2016b, title = {Einstellungen von Jugendlichen mit Migrationshintergrund zum Journalistenberuf}, author = {Bastian, M. }, editor = {P\"{o}ttker, H. and Kiesewetter, C. and Lofink, J.}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-01}, booktitle = {Migranten als Journalisten? Eine Studie zu Berufsperspektiven in der Einwanderungsgesellschaft}, pages = {128-137}, publisher = {P\"{o}ttker, H. and Kiesewetter, C. and Lofink, J. (eds): Migranten als Journalisten? Eine Studie zu Berufsperspektiven in der Einwanderungsgesellschaft. Springer VS}, address = {Wiesbaden}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {inbook} } |
| Bastian, M. Journalistische Schreibwerkstatt für Schüler mit Migrationshintergrund Pöttker, H; Kiesewetter, C; Lofink, J (Ed.): Migranten als Journalisten? Eine Studie zu Berufsperspektiven in der Einwanderungsgesellschaft, pp. 128-137, Pöttker, H. and Kiesewetter, C. and Lofink, J. (eds): Migranten als Journalisten? Eine Studie zu Berufsperspektiven in der Einwanderungsgesellschaft. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, 2016. @inbook{Bastian2016c, title = {Journalistische Schreibwerkstatt f\"{u}r Sch\"{u}ler mit Migrationshintergrund}, author = {Bastian, M.}, editor = {P\"{o}ttker, H. and Kiesewetter, C. and Lofink, J.}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-01}, booktitle = {Migranten als Journalisten? Eine Studie zu Berufsperspektiven in der Einwanderungsgesellschaft}, pages = {128-137}, publisher = {P\"{o}ttker, H. and Kiesewetter, C. and Lofink, J. (eds): Migranten als Journalisten? Eine Studie zu Berufsperspektiven in der Einwanderungsgesellschaft. Springer VS}, address = {Wiesbaden}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {inbook} } |
| Dragstra, L., Efthymiou, N., Hins, A., Lange, R. de Bewerking 18e druk van Belinfante's 'Beginselen van het Nederlandse staatsrecht' 2015, ( Deventer, Wolters Kluwer 2015.<br /> <br /> Leerboek voor eerstejaars studenten rechtsgeleerdheid. ). @book{, title = {Bewerking 18e druk van Belinfante's 'Beginselen van het Nederlandse staatsrecht'}, author = {Dragstra, L. and Efthymiou, N. and Lange, R. de and Hins, A.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1749.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-12-30}, note = { Deventer, Wolters Kluwer 2015.<br /> <br /> Leerboek voor eerstejaars studenten rechtsgeleerdheid. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {book} } |
| Hins, A., Kroes, Q. 2015. @misc{, title = {Mediawet 2008}, author = {Q. Kroes and A.W. Hins}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1733.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-12-29}, pages = {811-846.}, note = { In: Tekst & Commentaar: Telecommunicatie- en privacyrecht, vijfde druk, P.C. Knol & G.J. Zwenne (red.), Deventer: Wolters Kluwer, 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Schroff, S. Europeana Sounds and Copyrights: The Need for and Challenges in Licensing Archival Material Europeana Sounds 2015. @techreport{Schroff2015, title = {Europeana Sounds and Copyrights: The Need for and Challenges in Licensing Archival Material}, author = {Schroff, S.}, url = {http://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Projects/Project_list/Europeana_Sounds/Other%20documents%20related%20to%20the%20project/Europeana%20Report%20by%20IVIR%20final.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-12-23}, institution = {Europeana Sounds}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| van der Sloot, B. 2015. @misc{, title = {Editorial}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1695.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-12-15}, journal = {European Data Protection Law Review}, number = {2}, pages = {91-96}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| van der Sloot, B. 2015. @misc{, title = {Editorial}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1696.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-12-15}, journal = {European Data Protection Law Review}, number = {3}, pages = {161-163.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| van der Sloot, B. Book Review: Smart Technologies and the End(s) of Law 2015. @misc{, title = {Book Review: Smart Technologies and the End(s) of Law}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1697.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-12-15}, journal = {European Data Protection Law Review}, number = {2}, pages = {148-150.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| van der Sloot, B. Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 16 juli 2015 (Coty / Stadtsparkasse) 2015. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 16 juli 2015 (Coty / Stadtsparkasse)}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1698.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-12-15}, journal = {European Human Rights Cases}, number = {10}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| van der Sloot, B. Van openbaarheid naar hergebruik van overheidsinformatie: Of een vaarwel aan het sociaal contract NJB, (36), pp. 2537-2543., 2015. @article{, title = {Van openbaarheid naar hergebruik van overheidsinformatie: Of een vaarwel aan het sociaal contract}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1699.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-12-15}, journal = {NJB}, number = {36}, pages = {2537-2543.}, abstract = { Al decennia kent Nederland wetgeving op het gebied van de openbaarheid van informatie. Deze regels hebben ten doel overheidsmacht transparant en democratische controle mogelijk te maken. Onlangs is nieuwe regelgeving aangenomen door de Eerste Kamer. De Wet hergebruik overheidsinformatie ziet tevens op openbaarheid van overheidsinformatie, maar kent een fundamenteel ander doel dan voorgaande wetgeving. Niet de democratie of de controle op de macht staat centraal, maar de commerci\"{e}le exploitatie van overheidsinformatie door private ondernemingen. Dit brengt met zich dat de wetgeving een fundamenteel ander karakter krijgt, dat de overheid gegevens over burgers aan derden geeft zonder te weten waarvoor deze worden gebruikt en dat het sociaal contract tussen overheid en burger onder druk komt te staan. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Al decennia kent Nederland wetgeving op het gebied van de openbaarheid van informatie. Deze regels hebben ten doel overheidsmacht transparant en democratische controle mogelijk te maken. Onlangs is nieuwe regelgeving aangenomen door de Eerste Kamer. De Wet hergebruik overheidsinformatie ziet tevens op openbaarheid van overheidsinformatie, maar kent een fundamenteel ander doel dan voorgaande wetgeving. Niet de democratie of de controle op de macht staat centraal, maar de commerciële exploitatie van overheidsinformatie door private ondernemingen. Dit brengt met zich dat de wetgeving een fundamenteel ander karakter krijgt, dat de overheid gegevens over burgers aan derden geeft zonder te weten waarvoor deze worden gebruikt en dat het sociaal contract tussen overheid en burger onder druk komt te staan. |
| Keller, L. van, van der Sloot, B. Legal regulation of media agencies in the Netherlands 2015, ( In: J.G. Gaedertz, M. Martinek & S. Ory (eds.), <em><a href="http://www.amazon.de/Handbuch-Mediaagenturen-Aufgabenfelder-Gesch%C3%A4ftsmodelle-Wettbewerbsrecht/dp/340664466X" target="_blank">Handbuch Mediaagenturen - Aufgabenfelder, Geschäftsmodelle, Vertrags- und Wettbewerbsrecht / Handbook Media Agencies - Activities, Business Models, Contract Law and Competition Law</a>, </em>C.H. Beck<em> </em>2015 ). @misc{, title = {Legal regulation of media agencies in the Netherlands}, author = {Keller, L. van and van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1700.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-12-15}, note = { In: J.G. Gaedertz, M. Martinek & S. Ory (eds.), <em><a href="http://www.amazon.de/Handbuch-Mediaagenturen-Aufgabenfelder-Gesch%C3%A4ftsmodelle-Wettbewerbsrecht/dp/340664466X" target="_blank">Handbuch Mediaagenturen - Aufgabenfelder, Gesch\"{a}ftsmodelle, Vertrags- und Wettbewerbsrecht / Handbook Media Agencies - Activities, Business Models, Contract Law and Competition Law</a>, </em>C.H. Beck<em> </em>2015 }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| van der Sloot, B. 2015, ( In: S. Gutwirth et al. (eds.), <a href="http://www.springer.com/us/book/9789401773751#aboutBook" target="_blank"><em>Data Protection on the Move</em></a>, Law, Governance and Technology Series 24, 2016. ). @misc{, title = {Is the Human Rights Framework Still Fit for the Big Data Era? A Discussion of the ECtHR's Case Law on Privacy Violations Arising from Surveillance Activities}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1701.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-12-15}, abstract = { Human rights protect humans. This seemingly uncontroversial axiom might become quintessential over time, especially with regard to the right to privacy. Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights grants natural persons> a right to complain, in order to protect their individual interests, such as those related to personal freedom, human dignity and individual autonomy. With Big Data processes, however, individuals are mostly unaware that their personal data are gathered and processed and even if they are, they are often unable to substantiate their specific individual interest in these large data gathering systems. When the European Court of Human Rights assesses these types of cases, mostly revolving around (mass) surveillance activities, it finds itself stuck between the human rights framework on the one hand and the desire to evaluate surveillance practices by states on the other. Interestingly, the Court chooses to deal with these cases under Article 8 ECHR, but in order to do so, it is forced to go beyond the fundamental pillars of the human rights framework. }, note = { In: S. Gutwirth et al. (eds.), <a href="http://www.springer.com/us/book/9789401773751#aboutBook" target="_blank"><em>Data Protection on the Move</em></a>, Law, Governance and Technology Series 24, 2016. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Human rights protect humans. This seemingly uncontroversial axiom might become quintessential over time, especially with regard to the right to privacy. Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights grants natural persons> a right to complain, in order to protect their individual interests, such as those related to personal freedom, human dignity and individual autonomy. With Big Data processes, however, individuals are mostly unaware that their personal data are gathered and processed and even if they are, they are often unable to substantiate their specific individual interest in these large data gathering systems. When the European Court of Human Rights assesses these types of cases, mostly revolving around (mass) surveillance activities, it finds itself stuck between the human rights framework on the one hand and the desire to evaluate surveillance practices by states on the other. Interestingly, the Court chooses to deal with these cases under Article 8 ECHR, but in order to do so, it is forced to go beyond the fundamental pillars of the human rights framework. |
| Guibault, L. Les aléas du livre numérique aux Pays-Bas Les Cahiers de Propriété Intellectuelle, (3), pp. 1199-1205., 2015. @article{, title = {Les al\'{e}as du livre num\'{e}rique aux Pays-Bas}, author = {L. Guibault}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1702.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-12-15}, journal = {Les Cahiers de Propri\'{e}t\'{e} Intellectuelle}, number = {3}, pages = {1199-1205.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Dommering, E., van Eijk, N. Onvoldoende waarborgen in het kader van national veiligheid 2015. @misc{, title = {Onvoldoende waarborgen in het kader van national veiligheid}, author = {N.A.N.M. van Eijk and E.J. Dommering}, url = {http://njb.nl/highlights/onvoldoende-waarborgen-in-het-kader-van-nationale.18644.lynkx}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-12-10}, abstract = { In Nederland is tot dusver in het politieke debat over het noodzakelijke onafhankelijke toezicht op de inlichtingen en veiligheidsdiensten het Europese recht genegeerd of verkeerd uitgelegd. Met het Europese recht bedoelen wij zowel het EU Handvest als het Europees Verdrag voor de Rechten van de Mens. Dat is op grond van meerdere rechterlijke uitspraken niet langer mogelijk. }, note = { Opinie op NJB blog, 9 december 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } In Nederland is tot dusver in het politieke debat over het noodzakelijke onafhankelijke toezicht op de inlichtingen en veiligheidsdiensten het Europese recht genegeerd of verkeerd uitgelegd. Met het Europese recht bedoelen wij zowel het EU Handvest als het Europees Verdrag voor de Rechten van de Mens. Dat is op grond van meerdere rechterlijke uitspraken niet langer mogelijk. |
| Breemen, J., Breemen, V. KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi, (137), pp. 7947-7949., 2015. @article{, title = {Kroniek Mediarecht}, author = {J.M. Breemen and V.E. Breemen}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1692.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-12-08}, journal = {KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi}, number = {137}, pages = {7947-7949.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| van Eijk, N. KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi, (137), pp. 7949-7950., 2015. @article{, title = {Kroniek Telecommunicatierecht}, author = {N.A.N.M. van Eijk}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1693.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-12-08}, journal = {KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi}, number = {137}, pages = {7949-7950.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| van Eechoud, M., Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. Open Data, Privacy, and Fair Information Principles: Towards a Balancing Framework 2015. @article{, title = {Open Data, Privacy, and Fair Information Principles: Towards a Balancing Framework}, author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius and M.M.M. van Eechoud}, url = {http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2695005}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-12-03}, abstract = { Open data are held to contribute to a wide variety of social and political goals, including strengthening transparency, public participation and democratic accountability, promoting economic growth and innovation, and enabling greater public sector efficiency and cost savings. However, releasing government data that contain personal information may threaten privacy and related rights and interests. In this paper we ask how these privacy interests can be respected, without unduly hampering benefits from disclosing public sector information. We propose a balancing framework to help public authorities address this question in different contexts. The framework takes into account different levels of privacy risks for different types of data. It also separates decisions about access and re-use, and highlights a range of different disclosure routes. A circumstance catalogue lists factors that might be considered when assessing whether, under which conditions, and how a dataset can be released. While open data remains an important route for the publication of government information, we conclude that it is not the only route, and there must be clear and robust public interest arguments in order to justify the disclosure of personal information as open data. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Open data are held to contribute to a wide variety of social and political goals, including strengthening transparency, public participation and democratic accountability, promoting economic growth and innovation, and enabling greater public sector efficiency and cost savings. However, releasing government data that contain personal information may threaten privacy and related rights and interests. In this paper we ask how these privacy interests can be respected, without unduly hampering benefits from disclosing public sector information. We propose a balancing framework to help public authorities address this question in different contexts. The framework takes into account different levels of privacy risks for different types of data. It also separates decisions about access and re-use, and highlights a range of different disclosure routes. A circumstance catalogue lists factors that might be considered when assessing whether, under which conditions, and how a dataset can be released. While open data remains an important route for the publication of government information, we conclude that it is not the only route, and there must be clear and robust public interest arguments in order to justify the disclosure of personal information as open data. |
| Alberdingk Thijm, Chr. A., Vries, C. de De toenemende invloed van het Handvest op het recht van intellectuele eigendom Berichten Industriële Eigendom, (68), pp. 174-183., 2015. @article{, title = {De toenemende invloed van het Handvest op het recht van intellectuele eigendom}, author = {Vries, C. de and Alberdingk Thijm, Chr. A.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1688.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-11-27}, journal = {Berichten Industri\"{e}le Eigendom}, number = {68}, pages = {174-183.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Yakovleva, S. European Commission's progress reports on digitisation of the European cultural (and film) heritage Cahiers de la documentation - Bladen voor documentatie, (3), pp. 74-77., 2015. @article{, title = {European Commission's progress reports on digitisation of the European cultural (and film) heritage}, author = {S.V. Yakovleva}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1689.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-11-27}, journal = {Cahiers de la documentation - Bladen voor documentatie}, number = {3}, pages = {74-77.}, abstract = { Dit artikel maakt een synthese van twee voortgangsrapporten van de Europese Commissie in het domein van het digitale behoud van het Europees cultureel (en filmografisch) erfgoed. Het eerste rapport herziet en evalueert de vooruitgang van de digitalisering van het cultureel erfgoed die verliep tussen 2011 en 2013 volgende op de goedkeuring in 2011 van de Aanbeveling (van de Europese Commissie) betreffende de digitalisering en online toegankelijkheid van cultureel materiaal en digitale bewaring. Het tweede rapport geeft gevolg aan de Aanbeveling van het Europees Parlement over het cinematografisch erfgoed. Het concentreert zich op de vooruitgang, de uitdagingen en risico's die men tegenkomt gedurende het digitaliseringsproces van het cinematografisch erfgoed in 2012-2013. Zelfs indien de twee rapporten anntonen dat een zekere vooruitgang gerealiseerd werd in de betreffende domeinen, geven zij ook toe dat deze vooruitgang zeer beperkt was en dat de digitalisering een uitdaging blijft. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Dit artikel maakt een synthese van twee voortgangsrapporten van de Europese Commissie in het domein van het digitale behoud van het Europees cultureel (en filmografisch) erfgoed. Het eerste rapport herziet en evalueert de vooruitgang van de digitalisering van het cultureel erfgoed die verliep tussen 2011 en 2013 volgende op de goedkeuring in 2011 van de Aanbeveling (van de Europese Commissie) betreffende de digitalisering en online toegankelijkheid van cultureel materiaal en digitale bewaring. Het tweede rapport geeft gevolg aan de Aanbeveling van het Europees Parlement over het cinematografisch erfgoed. Het concentreert zich op de vooruitgang, de uitdagingen en risico's die men tegenkomt gedurende het digitaliseringsproces van het cinematografisch erfgoed in 2012-2013. Zelfs indien de twee rapporten anntonen dat een zekere vooruitgang gerealiseerd werd in de betreffende domeinen, geven zij ook toe dat deze vooruitgang zeer beperkt was en dat de digitalisering een uitdaging blijft. |
| Yakovleva, S. Russia's new anti-piracy law: A critical analysis European Intellectual Property Review, (9), pp. 608-613., 2015. @article{, title = {Russia's new anti-piracy law: A critical analysis}, author = {Yakovleva, S.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1690.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-11-27}, journal = {European Intellectual Property Review}, number = {9}, pages = {608-613.}, abstract = { This article analyses Russia's new anti-piracy law aimed at improving online enforcement of copyright and related rights. The article places the new developments in the context of the prior intellctual property rights enforcement regime and Russia's international and constitutional obligations to secure the right to freedom of expression. The author discusses and critically assesses the most important changes introduced by the new law, and draws conclusions about their correlation with freedom of expression, overall effectiveness and the impact on right holders, internet users and the internet industry. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This article analyses Russia's new anti-piracy law aimed at improving online enforcement of copyright and related rights. The article places the new developments in the context of the prior intellctual property rights enforcement regime and Russia's international and constitutional obligations to secure the right to freedom of expression. The author discusses and critically assesses the most important changes introduced by the new law, and draws conclusions about their correlation with freedom of expression, overall effectiveness and the impact on right holders, internet users and the internet industry. |
| Benabou, V., Bently, L., Dinwoodie, G., Dusollier, S., Derclaye E., Geiger, C., Griffiths, J., Hugenholtz, P., Kretschmer, M., Metzger, A., Peukert, A., Ricolfi, M., Rognstad, O., Vivant, M., Xalabarder, R. 2015. @misc{Hugenholtz2015, title = {Response to the European Commission’s Public Consultation on the Review of the EU Satellite and Cable Directive}, author = {Hugenholtz, P. and Benabou, V. and Derclaye E. and Dinwoodie, G. and Dusollier, S. and Geiger, C. and Griffiths, J. and Kretschmer, M. and Metzger, A. and Peukert, A. and Ricolfi, M. and Rognstad, O. and Vivant, M. and Xalabarder, R. and Bently, L.}, url = {http://ivir00.websites.xs4all.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/237.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-11-15}, publisher = {European Copyright Society}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Cavaliere, P., Irion, K., Pavli, D. 2015. @techreport{, title = {Comparative study of best European practices of online content regulation: Law and policy of online content regulation, in particular defamation online, in the light of Albanian legislative proposals}, author = {P. Cavaliere and D. Pavli and K. Irion}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1683.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-11-10}, note = { Study commissioned by the Council of Europe, Amsterdam/Edinburgh/Tirana, August 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| Arnbak, A. Safe Harbor 2.0 gedoemd te mislukken 2015. @misc{, title = {Safe Harbor 2.0 gedoemd te mislukken}, author = {A.M. Arnbak}, url = {https://www.axelarnbak.nl/2015/11/05/16e-column-financieele-dagblad-privacy-week-safe-harbor-2-0-gedoemd-te-mislukken/}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-11-05}, note = { Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 4 november 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| van Eechoud, M. Annotatie bij Rb. Amsterdam 10 juni 2015 (Pictoright / Stadsarchief Rotterdam) 2015. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij Rb. Amsterdam 10 juni 2015 (Pictoright / Stadsarchief Rotterdam)}, author = {M.M.M. van Eechoud}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1656.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-11-05}, journal = {AMI}, number = {5}, pages = {140-145.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Irion, K. Cloud services made in Europe after Snowden and Schrems 2015. @article{, title = {Cloud services made in Europe after Snowden and Schrems}, author = {K. Irion}, url = {http://policyreview.info/articles/news/cloud-services-made-europe-after-snowden-and-schrems/377}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-10-27}, note = { Comment in Internet Policy Review, 23 October 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Arnbak, A., Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. 2015. @article{, title = {New Data Security Requirements and the Proceduralization of Mass Surveillance Law after the European Data Retention Case}, author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius and A.M. Arnbak}, url = {http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2678860}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-10-27}, abstract = { This paper discusses the regulation of mass metadata surveillance in Europe through the lens of the landmark judgment in which the Court of Justice of the European Union struck down the Data Retention Directive. The controversial directive obliged telecom and Internet access providers in Europe to retain metadata of all their customers for intelligence and law enforcement purposes, for a period of up to two years. In the ruling, the Court declared the directive in violation of the human rights to privacy and data protection. The Court also confirmed that the mere collection of metadata interferes with the human right to privacy. In addition, the Court developed three new criteria for assessing the level of data security required from a human rights perspective: security measures should take into account the risk of unlawful access to data, and the data’s quantity and sensitivity. While organizations that campaigned against the directive have welcomed the ruling, we warn for the risk of proceduralization of mass surveillance law. The Court did not fully condemn mass surveillance that relies on metadata, but left open the possibility of mass surveillance if policymakers lay down sufficient procedural safeguards. Such proceduralization brings systematic risks for human rights. Government agencies, with ample resources, can design complicated systems of procedural oversight for mass surveillance – and claim that mass surveillance is lawful, even if it affects millions of innocent people. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This paper discusses the regulation of mass metadata surveillance in Europe through the lens of the landmark judgment in which the Court of Justice of the European Union struck down the Data Retention Directive. The controversial directive obliged telecom and Internet access providers in Europe to retain metadata of all their customers for intelligence and law enforcement purposes, for a period of up to two years. In the ruling, the Court declared the directive in violation of the human rights to privacy and data protection. The Court also confirmed that the mere collection of metadata interferes with the human right to privacy. In addition, the Court developed three new criteria for assessing the level of data security required from a human rights perspective: security measures should take into account the risk of unlawful access to data, and the data’s quantity and sensitivity. While organizations that campaigned against the directive have welcomed the ruling, we warn for the risk of proceduralization of mass surveillance law. The Court did not fully condemn mass surveillance that relies on metadata, but left open the possibility of mass surveillance if policymakers lay down sufficient procedural safeguards. Such proceduralization brings systematic risks for human rights. Government agencies, with ample resources, can design complicated systems of procedural oversight for mass surveillance – and claim that mass surveillance is lawful, even if it affects millions of innocent people. |
| Hugenholtz, P. Extending the SatCab Model to the Internet 2015. @techreport{, title = {Extending the SatCab Model to the Internet}, author = {P.B. Hugenholtz}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1822}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-10-26}, note = { Study commissioned by BEUC. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| McGonagle, T. Freedom of Expression, the Media and Journalists: Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights European Audiovisual Observatory, Strasbourg, 2015. @book{, title = {Freedom of Expression, the Media and Journalists: Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights}, author = {T. McGonagle}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1644.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-10-23}, pages = {409}, publisher = {European Audiovisual Observatory}, address = {Strasbourg}, series = {IRIS Themes}, abstract = { This e-book provides valuable insights into the European Court of Human Rights’ case-law on freedom of expression and media and journalistic freedoms. The first edition of the e-book (2013) proved hugely successful, with 18,671 downloads in 2014 alone. The new updated edition summarises over 240 judgments or decisions by the Court and provides hyperlinks to the full text of each of the summarised judgments or decisions (via HUDOC, the Court's online case-law database). The e-book is also available in French. For an optimal navigational experience, one should download the e-book and read the technical tips on p. 3. }, note = { New, updated version. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {book} } This e-book provides valuable insights into the European Court of Human Rights’ case-law on freedom of expression and media and journalistic freedoms. The first edition of the e-book (2013) proved hugely successful, with 18,671 downloads in 2014 alone. The new updated edition summarises over 240 judgments or decisions by the Court and provides hyperlinks to the full text of each of the summarised judgments or decisions (via HUDOC, the Court's online case-law database). The e-book is also available in French. For an optimal navigational experience, one should download the e-book and read the technical tips on p. 3. |
| McGonagle, T. Positive obligations concerning freedom of expression: mere potential or real power? pp. 9-35., 2015, (Chapter in: Journalism at risk: Threats, challenges and perspectives, O. Andreotti (ed.), Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing 2015, p. 9-35.). @inbook{McGonagle2015, title = {Positive obligations concerning freedom of expression: mere potential or real power?}, author = {McGonagle, T.}, url = {https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=0900001680706afe}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-10-23}, pages = {9-35.}, abstract = { This chapter examines how the European Court of Human Rights has identified and developed a range of positive State obligations to secure the right to freedom of expression. It first briefly examines the theoretical and normative bases for the positive obligations doctrine and then traces its hesitant development in the case-law of the Court. Next, it shows how the Court has slowly become more comfortable with the doctrine and more confident when applying it to cases involving freedom of expression, culminating in its \emph{Dink v. Turkey} judgment. The driving argument of the chapter is that the positive obligations doctrine has enormous potential for strengthening the right to freedom of expression and that the Court must now tease out its implications in concrete cases in a very scrupulous way, if the doctrine’s full potential is to be realised. }, note = {Chapter in: Journalism at risk: Threats, challenges and perspectives, O. Andreotti (ed.), Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing 2015, p. 9-35.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {inbook} } This chapter examines how the European Court of Human Rights has identified and developed a range of positive State obligations to secure the right to freedom of expression. It first briefly examines the theoretical and normative bases for the positive obligations doctrine and then traces its hesitant development in the case-law of the Court. Next, it shows how the Court has slowly become more comfortable with the doctrine and more confident when applying it to cases involving freedom of expression, culminating in its Dink v. Turkey judgment. The driving argument of the chapter is that the positive obligations doctrine has enormous potential for strengthening the right to freedom of expression and that the Court must now tease out its implications in concrete cases in a very scrupulous way, if the doctrine’s full potential is to be realised. |
| van Eijk, N. Study on the Future of European Audiovisual Regulation 2015. @techreport{, title = {Study on the Future of European Audiovisual Regulation}, author = {N.A.N.M. van Eijk}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1643.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-10-22}, abstract = { The study on the future of European audiovsiual media regulation develops new ideas and recommendations for shaping a new European framework. A structural reform is favoured, as a response to digitization and convergence. The new framework should concentrate on general principles and be able to adapt and learn. Regulation should not be linked to types of services, but rather be developed by considering its goals, like protection of minors and consumer protection. Standards should be set allowing for effective regulation and coordination. Moreover by taking a 360-degree view on all relevant areas of regulation, it needs to become visible, where the European Law can offer leeway for to the member states’ own media policy. The study called HERMES draws a precise image of current media consumption and value-added chains by examining several EU member states, as well as certain international states. The developments of the last years are being examined and current phenomena are explored. The centre of attention is the shift away from regular TV to non-linear media and the consumption via alternative channels as well as via new devices, which were not yet taken into account when shaping the present framework. The outcomes are analysed and put into practical guidelines for the near future. }, note = { Final report of HERMES project lead by Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz (Hans-Bredow-Institut for Media Research) and Prof. Dr. Nico van Eijk (Institute for Information Law), Hamburg/Amsterdam, October 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } The study on the future of European audiovsiual media regulation develops new ideas and recommendations for shaping a new European framework. A structural reform is favoured, as a response to digitization and convergence. The new framework should concentrate on general principles and be able to adapt and learn. Regulation should not be linked to types of services, but rather be developed by considering its goals, like protection of minors and consumer protection. Standards should be set allowing for effective regulation and coordination. Moreover by taking a 360-degree view on all relevant areas of regulation, it needs to become visible, where the European Law can offer leeway for to the member states’ own media policy. The study called HERMES draws a precise image of current media consumption and value-added chains by examining several EU member states, as well as certain international states. The developments of the last years are being examined and current phenomena are explored. The centre of attention is the shift away from regular TV to non-linear media and the consumption via alternative channels as well as via new devices, which were not yet taken into account when shaping the present framework. The outcomes are analysed and put into practical guidelines for the near future. |
| van Eijk, N., Weitzner, D.J. Privacy Bridges: EU and US Privacy Experts In Search of Transatlantic Privacy Solutions 2015, (Amsterdam/Cambridge, 2015. The EU-US Privacy Bridges project is co-chaired by Nico van Eijk and Daniel J. Weitzner. See report for full list of project participants and see EU-US Privacy Bridges project page for more information about the project: https://privacybridges.mit.edu/ ). @techreport{, title = {Privacy Bridges: EU and US Privacy Experts In Search of Transatlantic Privacy Solutions}, author = {Weitzner, D.J. and van Eijk, N.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1640.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-10-21}, abstract = {The EU and US share a common commitment to privacy protection as a cornerstone of democracy. Following the Treaty of Lisbon, data privacy is a fundamental right that the European Union must proactively guarantee. In the United States, data privacy derives from constitutional protections in the First, Fourth and Fifth Amendment as well as federal and state statute, consumer protection law and common law. The ultimate goal of effective privacy protection is shared. However, current friction between the two legal systems poses challenges to realizing privacy and the free flow of information across the Atlantic. Recent expansion of online surveillance practices underline these challenges. Over nine months, the group prepared a consensus report outlining a menu of privacy “bridges” that can be built to bring the European Union and the United States closer together. The efforts are aimed at providing a framework of practical options that advance strong, globally-accepted privacy values in a manner that respects the substantive and procedural differences between the two jurisdictions. The report will be presented at the 2015 International Conference of Privacy and Data Protection Commissioners, which the Dutch Data Protection Authority will host in Amsterdam on 28-29 October 2015.}, note = {Amsterdam/Cambridge, 2015. The EU-US Privacy Bridges project is co-chaired by Nico van Eijk and Daniel J. Weitzner. See report for full list of project participants and see EU-US Privacy Bridges project page for more information about the project: https://privacybridges.mit.edu/ }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } The EU and US share a common commitment to privacy protection as a cornerstone of democracy. Following the Treaty of Lisbon, data privacy is a fundamental right that the European Union must proactively guarantee. In the United States, data privacy derives from constitutional protections in the First, Fourth and Fifth Amendment as well as federal and state statute, consumer protection law and common law. The ultimate goal of effective privacy protection is shared. However, current friction between the two legal systems poses challenges to realizing privacy and the free flow of information across the Atlantic. Recent expansion of online surveillance practices underline these challenges. Over nine months, the group prepared a consensus report outlining a menu of privacy “bridges” that can be built to bring the European Union and the United States closer together. The efforts are aimed at providing a framework of practical options that advance strong, globally-accepted privacy values in a manner that respects the substantive and procedural differences between the two jurisdictions. The report will be presented at the 2015 International Conference of Privacy and Data Protection Commissioners, which the Dutch Data Protection Authority will host in Amsterdam on 28-29 October 2015. |
| van Eechoud, M. Making Access to Government Data Work Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, (2), 2015. @article{, title = {Making Access to Government Data Work}, author = {M.M.M. van Eechoud}, url = {https://journals.muni.cz/mujlt/article/view/3717}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-10-21}, journal = {Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology}, number = {2}, abstract = { The EU Directive on Re-use of Public Sector Information of 2013 (the PSI Directive) is a key instrument for open data policies at all levels of government in Member States. It sets out a general framework for the conditions governing the right to re-use information resources held by public sector bodies. It includes provisions on non-discrimination, transparent licensing and the like. However, what the PSI Directive does not do is give businesses, civil society or citizens an actual claim to access. Access is of course a prerequisite to (re)use. It is largely a matter for individual Member States to regulate what information is in the public record. This article explores what the options for the EC are to promote alignment of rights to information and re-use policy. It also flags a number of important data protection problems that have not been given serious enough consideration, but have the potential to paralyze open data policies. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } The EU Directive on Re-use of Public Sector Information of 2013 (the PSI Directive) is a key instrument for open data policies at all levels of government in Member States. It sets out a general framework for the conditions governing the right to re-use information resources held by public sector bodies. It includes provisions on non-discrimination, transparent licensing and the like. However, what the PSI Directive does not do is give businesses, civil society or citizens an actual claim to access. Access is of course a prerequisite to (re)use. It is largely a matter for individual Member States to regulate what information is in the public record. This article explores what the options for the EC are to promote alignment of rights to information and re-use policy. It also flags a number of important data protection problems that have not been given serious enough consideration, but have the potential to paralyze open data policies. |
| Hugenholtz, P. Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 28 maart 2014 (Norma / NLKabel) 2015. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 28 maart 2014 (Norma / NLKabel)}, author = {P.B. Hugenholtz}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1641.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-10-20}, journal = {NJ}, number = {42}, pages = {4822-4825.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Tsoutsanis, A. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, (10), pp. 725., 2015, ( Editorial. ). @article{, title = {Back to Black: justice.cn}, author = {Tsoutsanis, A.}, url = {http://ssrn.com/abstract=2667516}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-10-15}, journal = {Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice}, number = {10}, pages = {725.}, abstract = { This short - peer reviewed - article touches on innovation in China in the field of smart phones, recent legislative reform in China for fostering intellectual property and combating counterfeit and trade mark grabbing. It also touches on human rights in China, the different approach in which the West advances its economic v human rights agenda and the selective way Silicon Valley industry participates in grass roots debate on civil liberties. The article also touches on the 'right to seek counsel' as one of the fundamental rights, which many arrested lawyers in China were deprived of during the July 2015 arrests. }, note = { Editorial. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This short - peer reviewed - article touches on innovation in China in the field of smart phones, recent legislative reform in China for fostering intellectual property and combating counterfeit and trade mark grabbing. It also touches on human rights in China, the different approach in which the West advances its economic v human rights agenda and the selective way Silicon Valley industry participates in grass roots debate on civil liberties. The article also touches on the 'right to seek counsel' as one of the fundamental rights, which many arrested lawyers in China were deprived of during the July 2015 arrests. |
| Leerssen, P. JIPITEC, 6 (2), 2015. @article{Leerssen2019, title = {Cut Out By The Middle Man: The Free Speech Implications Of Social Network Blocking and Banning In The EU}, author = {Leerssen, P.}, url = {https://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-6-2-2015/4271/leerssen.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-10-10}, journal = {JIPITEC}, volume = {6}, number = {2}, abstract = {This article examines social network users’ legal defences against content removal under the EU and ECHR frameworks, and their implications for the effective exercise of free speech online. A review of the Terms of Use and content moderation policies of two major social network services, Facebook and Twitter, shows that end users are unlikely to have a contractual defence against content removal. Under the EU and ECHR frameworks, they may demand the observance of free speech principles in state-issued blocking orders and their implementation by intermediaries, but cannot invoke this ‘fair balance’ test against the voluntary removal decisions by the social network service. Drawing on practical examples, this article explores the threat to free speech created by this lack of accountability: Firstly, a shift from legislative regulation and formal injunctions to public-private collaborations allows state authorities to influence these ostensibly voluntary policies, thereby circumventing constitutional safeguards. Secondly, even absent state interference, the commercial incentives of social media cannot be guaranteed to coincide with democratic ideals. In light of the blurring of public and private functions in the regulation of social media expression, this article calls for the increased accountability of the social media services towards end users regarding the observance of free speech principles.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This article examines social network users’ legal defences against content removal under the EU and ECHR frameworks, and their implications for the effective exercise of free speech online. A review of the Terms of Use and content moderation policies of two major social network services, Facebook and Twitter, shows that end users are unlikely to have a contractual defence against content removal. Under the EU and ECHR frameworks, they may demand the observance of free speech principles in state-issued blocking orders and their implementation by intermediaries, but cannot invoke this ‘fair balance’ test against the voluntary removal decisions by the social network service. Drawing on practical examples, this article explores the threat to free speech created by this lack of accountability: Firstly, a shift from legislative regulation and formal injunctions to public-private collaborations allows state authorities to influence these ostensibly voluntary policies, thereby circumventing constitutional safeguards. Secondly, even absent state interference, the commercial incentives of social media cannot be guaranteed to coincide with democratic ideals. In light of the blurring of public and private functions in the regulation of social media expression, this article calls for the increased accountability of the social media services towards end users regarding the observance of free speech principles. |
| Arnbak, A. Datatransport - Hof EU nog steeds niet volwassen 2015. @misc{, title = {Datatransport - Hof EU nog steeds niet volwassen}, author = {A.M. Arnbak}, url = {https://www.axelarnbak.nl/2015/10/07/15e-column-financieele-dagblad-datatransport-hof-eu-nog-steeds-niet-volwassen/}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-10-09}, note = { Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 7 oktober 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| McGonagle, T. Freedom of expression: new opportunities and challenges 2015. @misc{, title = {Freedom of expression: new opportunities and challenges}, author = {T. McGonagle}, url = {http://play.webvideocore.net/popplayer.php?it=55i5kw2syio0&is_link=1&w=720&h=405&pause=1&title=1502002+-+Tarlach+McGonagle+Interview+-+ENG&skin=3&repeat=&brandNW=1&start_volume=100&bg_gradient1=&bg_gradient2=&fullscreen=&fs_mode=0&skinAlpha=80&colorBase=%}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-10-09}, abstract = { This is one of seven videos about different aspects of the right to freedom of expression: hate speech, protection of sources, defamation, access to information, terrorism, Internet freedom and new opportunities and challenges for freedom of expression. The videos were produced by the Council of Europe and they take the form of interviews with leading experts in the field, including three sitting judges of the European Court of Human Rights, a former Vice-President of the Court and the Council of Europe Human Rights Commissioner. }, note = { Video series produced by the Council of Europe, The Hows and Whys: Freedom of Expression, a Human Right, October 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } This is one of seven videos about different aspects of the right to freedom of expression: hate speech, protection of sources, defamation, access to information, terrorism, Internet freedom and new opportunities and challenges for freedom of expression. The videos were produced by the Council of Europe and they take the form of interviews with leading experts in the field, including three sitting judges of the European Court of Human Rights, a former Vice-President of the Court and the Council of Europe Human Rights Commissioner. |
| Kabel, J. Het enige Nederlandstalige handboek over mediarecht 2015. @misc{, title = {Het enige Nederlandstalige handboek over mediarecht}, author = {J.J.C. Kabel}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1636.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-10-08}, journal = {Mediaforum}, number = {6}, pages = {210-213.}, note = { Boekbespreking van D. Voorhoof & P. Valcke, Handboek Mediarecht, 4e editie, Brussel: Larcier 2014. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Poort, J. Veranderingen in de telecommarkt: consolidatie en differentiatie Mediaforum, (6), pp. 205-209., 2015. @article{, title = {Veranderingen in de telecommarkt: consolidatie en differentiatie}, author = {J.P. Poort}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1633.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-10-06}, journal = {Mediaforum}, number = {6}, pages = {205-209.}, abstract = { Dit artikel bespreekt de recente ontwikkelingen in het Nederlandse telecommunicatielandschap en gaat in op de verwachtingen voor de komende jaren. Hoe zullen de markten voor televisie, telefonie en breedband op vast en mobiel zich de komende jaren ontwikkelen, gemeten naar het aantal aansluitingen en de omzet? Welke verdere ontwikkelingen tekenen zich af en welke gevolgen zouden die moeten hebben voor de strategie van aanbieders? }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Dit artikel bespreekt de recente ontwikkelingen in het Nederlandse telecommunicatielandschap en gaat in op de verwachtingen voor de komende jaren. Hoe zullen de markten voor televisie, telefonie en breedband op vast en mobiel zich de komende jaren ontwikkelen, gemeten naar het aantal aansluitingen en de omzet? Welke verdere ontwikkelingen tekenen zich af en welke gevolgen zouden die moeten hebben voor de strategie van aanbieders? |
| Irion, K. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 23 (4), pp. 348-371., 2015, ((2015) International Journal of Law and Information Technology 23(4): 348-371, DOI: 10.1093/ijlit/eav015, available at http://ijlit.oxfordjournals.org/content/23/4/348.abstract). @article{, title = {Your Digital Home is No Longer Your Castle: How Cloud Computing Transforms the (Legal) Relationship between Individuals and Their Personal Records}, author = {Irion, K.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1584.pdf}, doi = {10.1093/ijlit/eav015}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-29}, journal = {International Journal of Law and Information Technology}, volume = {23}, number = {4}, pages = {348-371.}, abstract = {In line with the overall trend individuals’ personal affairs, too, are composed of digital records to an increasing amount. At about the same time, the era of local storage in end user equipment is about to give way to remote computing where data resides on third party equipment (cloud computing). Once information, and even the most personal one, is no longer stored on personal equipment the relationship between individual users and their digital assets belonging to them is becoming increasingly abstract. This contribution focuses on the implications of cloud computing for individuals’ unpublicized digital records. The question to be answered is whether - taken together - the progressing virtualization and the disruption of physical control produce a backslide for individual positions of rights. The paper introduces the legal treatment of users’ digital personal records and how a technical transformation in combination with disparate legal protection and prevailing commercial practices are bound to impact the distribution of rights and obligations. }, note = {(2015) International Journal of Law and Information Technology 23(4): 348-371, DOI: 10.1093/ijlit/eav015, available at http://ijlit.oxfordjournals.org/content/23/4/348.abstract}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } In line with the overall trend individuals’ personal affairs, too, are composed of digital records to an increasing amount. At about the same time, the era of local storage in end user equipment is about to give way to remote computing where data resides on third party equipment (cloud computing). Once information, and even the most personal one, is no longer stored on personal equipment the relationship between individual users and their digital assets belonging to them is becoming increasingly abstract. This contribution focuses on the implications of cloud computing for individuals’ unpublicized digital records. The question to be answered is whether - taken together - the progressing virtualization and the disruption of physical control produce a backslide for individual positions of rights. The paper introduces the legal treatment of users’ digital personal records and how a technical transformation in combination with disparate legal protection and prevailing commercial practices are bound to impact the distribution of rights and obligations. |
| Fahy, R., van Eechoud, M. Clinical Legal Education: A Review of the Literature 2015. @techreport{, title = {Clinical Legal Education: A Review of the Literature}, author = {R.F. Fahy and M.M.M. van Eechoud}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1630.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-29}, note = { iLINC (ICT Law Incubators Network), September 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| Fahy, R., van Eechoud, M. Establishing Links to Learning 2015. @techreport{, title = {Establishing Links to Learning}, author = {R.F. Fahy and M.M.M. van Eechoud}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1631.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-29}, note = { iLINC (ICT Law Incubators Network), Work Package 3, September 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| van Eechoud, M. Students going cross-border for start-ups 2015. @misc{, title = {Students going cross-border for start-ups}, author = {M.M.M. van Eechoud}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1632.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-29}, note = { iLINC Law Incubator Brief, 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Fahy, R., van Eechoud, M. Establishing a Start-up Law Clinic in a Law School - 10 Practical Tips 2015. @misc{, title = {Establishing a Start-up Law Clinic in a Law School - 10 Practical Tips}, author = {R.F. Fahy and M.M.M. van Eechoud}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1684.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-29}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
How to Start-Up A Legal Clinic: Key Considerations 2015. @article{, title = {How to Start-Up A Legal Clinic: Key Considerations}, url = {https://www.ilincnetwork.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/6-PB-How-to-Start-Up-a-Legal-Clinic-Key-Considerations.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-29}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Fahy, R., van Eechoud, M. Establishing a Start-up Law Clinic in Law School: A Practical Guide 2015. @techreport{, title = {Establishing a Start-up Law Clinic in Law School: A Practical Guide}, author = {R.F. Fahy and M.M.M. van Eechoud}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1686.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-29}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| Hugenholtz, P. De Rechtspositie van de Audiovisuele Maker binnen de Publieke Omroep 2015. @techreport{, title = {De Rechtspositie van de Audiovisuele Maker binnen de Publieke Omroep}, author = {P.B. Hugenholtz}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1628.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-22}, note = { Onderzoek in opdracht van de Raad voor Cultuur, Amsterdam, juli 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| Quintais, J., Velze, S.C. van, Yakovleva, S. Symposium on Alternative Compensation Systems for Digital Copyright 2015, ( Summary Report of <a href="http://www.ivir.nl/onderzoek/acs">ACS Symposium</a> on Saturday 11 July 2015. ). @techreport{, title = {Symposium on Alternative Compensation Systems for Digital Copyright}, author = {Quintais, J. and Velze, S.C. van and Yakovleva, S.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1629.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-22}, note = { Summary Report of <a href="http://www.ivir.nl/onderzoek/acs">ACS Symposium</a> on Saturday 11 July 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| Breemen, J., Breemen, V. KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi, (136), pp. 7879-7882., 2015. @article{, title = {Kroniek Mediarecht}, author = {J.M. Breemen and V.E. Breemen}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1626.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-18}, journal = {KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi}, number = {136}, pages = {7879-7882.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| van Eijk, N. KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi, (136), pp. 7882-7883., 2015. @article{, title = {Kroniek Telecommunicatierecht}, author = {N.A.N.M. van Eijk}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1627.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-18}, journal = {KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi}, number = {136}, pages = {7882-7883.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. Freedom of Expression and 'Right to Be Forgotten' Cases in the Netherlands after Google Spain European Data Protection Law Review, (2), pp. 113-125., 2015. @article{, title = {Freedom of Expression and 'Right to Be Forgotten' Cases in the Netherlands after Google Spain}, author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius}, url = {http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2652171}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-17}, journal = {European Data Protection Law Review}, number = {2}, pages = {113-125.}, abstract = { Since the Google Spain judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Europeans have, under certain conditions, the right to have search results for their name delisted. This paper examines how the Google Spain judgment has been applied in the Netherlands. Since the Google Spain judgment, Dutch courts have decided on two cases regarding delisting requests. In both cases, the Dutch courts considered freedom of expression aspects of delisting more thoroughly than the Court of Justice. However, the effect of the Google Spain judgment on freedom of expression is difficult to assess, as search engine operators decide about most delisting requests without disclosing much about their decisions. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Since the Google Spain judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Europeans have, under certain conditions, the right to have search results for their name delisted. This paper examines how the Google Spain judgment has been applied in the Netherlands. Since the Google Spain judgment, Dutch courts have decided on two cases regarding delisting requests. In both cases, the Dutch courts considered freedom of expression aspects of delisting more thoroughly than the Court of Justice. However, the effect of the Google Spain judgment on freedom of expression is difficult to assess, as search engine operators decide about most delisting requests without disclosing much about their decisions. |
| Guibault, L., Margoni, T. Legal aspects of open access to publicly funded research 2015. @misc{, title = {Legal aspects of open access to publicly funded research}, author = {L. Guibault and T. Margoni}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1625.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-17}, pages = {373-414.}, abstract = { Internet growth, content digitisation, and expanding “big data” and data analytics capabilities have affected the ways in which publicly funded research results are accessed, disseminated and used. While these technological advances have made sharing and processing information easier, that does not change the fact that the information may be protected by IP laws. Open access efforts, which aim to make the outputs of publicly funded research more widely accessible in digital formats, therefore raise a number of IP policy questions. To explain the interplay between open access and IP laws, this chapter provides an overview of the IP regimes that protect research outputs in a sample of OECD jurisdictions. It then reviews the open access policies that are in place in some of those jurisdictions and examines two contexts in which IP questions can arise when open access principles are applied: public/private partnerships and text and data mining. }, note = { Chapter 7 of OECD report Enquiries Into Intellectual Property's Economic Impact, 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Internet growth, content digitisation, and expanding “big data” and data analytics capabilities have affected the ways in which publicly funded research results are accessed, disseminated and used. While these technological advances have made sharing and processing information easier, that does not change the fact that the information may be protected by IP laws. Open access efforts, which aim to make the outputs of publicly funded research more widely accessible in digital formats, therefore raise a number of IP policy questions. To explain the interplay between open access and IP laws, this chapter provides an overview of the IP regimes that protect research outputs in a sample of OECD jurisdictions. It then reviews the open access policies that are in place in some of those jurisdictions and examines two contexts in which IP questions can arise when open access principles are applied: public/private partnerships and text and data mining. |
| Hugenholtz, P., van Gompel, S. Op weg naar een wettelijk stelsel van extended collective licensing voor massadigitalisering? AMI, (4), pp. 93-102., 2015. @article{, title = {Op weg naar een wettelijk stelsel van extended collective licensing voor massadigitalisering?}, author = {S.J. van Gompel and P.B. Hugenholtz}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1623.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-15}, journal = {AMI}, number = {4}, pages = {93-102.}, abstract = { De 'extended collective license (ECL) - ofwel de 'verruimde' collectieve licentieovereenkomst - staat in Nederland en elders ter wereld al enkele jaren sterk in de belangstelling, met name als wettelijk instrument om de rights clearance voor massadigitaliseringsprojecten van erfgoedinstellingen te vergemakkelijken. Naar aanleiding van een gezamenlijke brief van de Nederlandse erfgoedinstellingen en de Federatie Auteursrechtbelangen heeft het Ministerie van OCW door het IViR onderzoek laten verrichten naar het ECL-model en daarover een seminar met belanghebbbenden georganiseerd. In de zomer van 2015 wordt een standpuntbepaling van het kabinet inzake ECL verwacht. In dit artikel worden de belangijkste bevindingen van het onderzoek samengevat. Welke voor- en nadelen zou een ECL-regeling bieden ten opzichte van het huidige Nederlandse model van vrijwillige collectieve licenties die zonder ondersteunende wettelijke maatregelen tot stand komen? }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } De 'extended collective license (ECL) - ofwel de 'verruimde' collectieve licentieovereenkomst - staat in Nederland en elders ter wereld al enkele jaren sterk in de belangstelling, met name als wettelijk instrument om de rights clearance voor massadigitaliseringsprojecten van erfgoedinstellingen te vergemakkelijken. Naar aanleiding van een gezamenlijke brief van de Nederlandse erfgoedinstellingen en de Federatie Auteursrechtbelangen heeft het Ministerie van OCW door het IViR onderzoek laten verrichten naar het ECL-model en daarover een seminar met belanghebbbenden georganiseerd. In de zomer van 2015 wordt een standpuntbepaling van het kabinet inzake ECL verwacht. In dit artikel worden de belangijkste bevindingen van het onderzoek samengevat. Welke voor- en nadelen zou een ECL-regeling bieden ten opzichte van het huidige Nederlandse model van vrijwillige collectieve licenties die zonder ondersteunende wettelijke maatregelen tot stand komen? |
| van der Sloot, B. Annotatie bij Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens 16 juni 2015 (Delfi AS / Estland) 2015. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens 16 juni 2015 (Delfi AS / Estland)}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1622.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-11}, journal = {European Human Rights Cases}, number = {9}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Arnbak, A. Afluisterwet is juridische gatenkaas 2015. @misc{, title = {Afluisterwet is juridische gatenkaas}, author = {A.M. Arnbak}, url = {https://www.axelarnbak.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/FD14.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-10}, note = { Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 9 september 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| van der Sloot, B. 2015, ( Interview in <em>Rechtspraak, </em>Magazine van de Raad voor de Rechtspraak. ). @misc{, title = {Big data bieden geen keus}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1620.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-04}, journal = {Rechtspraak}, number = {3}, pages = {22-24.}, note = { Interview in <em>Rechtspraak, </em>Magazine van de Raad voor de Rechtspraak. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
01.09.2015. @misc{, title = {Your Digital Home Is No Longer Your Castle: How cloud computing transforms the (legal) relationship between individuals and their personal records}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1614.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-01}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {presentation} } |
| Margoni, T., van Rompuy, B. UK Horserace Betting Right: at odds with EU law? 2015, ( Opinion. ). @misc{, title = {UK Horserace Betting Right: at odds with EU law?}, author = {Van Rompuy, B. and Margoni, T.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1615.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-01}, journal = {European Intellectual Property Review}, number = {8}, pages = {479-483.}, abstract = { About ten years after a previous initiative to replace the Horserace Betting Levy was abandoned following a judgment from the Court of Justice (CJ),1 the UK government announced that it will introduce a Horserace Betting Right and repeal the Levy that to date has cross-subsidised horseracing. In this comment, the authors warn that the implementation of a Betting Right could be problematic from an EU law perspective. The UK government, and any other interested EU legislator, should reconsider the opportunity of a specifically devised betting right. }, note = { Opinion. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } About ten years after a previous initiative to replace the Horserace Betting Levy was abandoned following a judgment from the Court of Justice (CJ),1 the UK government announced that it will introduce a Horserace Betting Right and repeal the Levy that to date has cross-subsidised horseracing. In this comment, the authors warn that the implementation of a Betting Right could be problematic from an EU law perspective. The UK government, and any other interested EU legislator, should reconsider the opportunity of a specifically devised betting right. |
| Irion, K., Morganti, L., Renda, A. Guest editorial: New intermediaries in the hyperconnected society Info, (6), pp. 3-7., 2015, ( DOI: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/info-07-2015-0038">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/info-07-2015-0038</a> ). @article{, title = {Guest editorial: New intermediaries in the hyperconnected society}, author = {Morganti, L. and Renda, A. and Irion, K.}, url = {http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/info-07-2015-0038}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-01}, journal = {Info}, number = {6}, pages = {3-7.}, note = { DOI: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/info-07-2015-0038">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/info-07-2015-0038</a> }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Angelopoulos, C. Info, (6), pp. 72-96., 2015. @article{, title = {Sketching the outline of a ghost: the fair balance between copyright and fundamental rights in intermediary third party liability}, author = {C.J. Angelopoulos}, url = {http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/info-05-2015-0028}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-01}, journal = {Info}, number = {6}, pages = {72-96.}, note = { DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/info-05-2015-0028 }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Helberger, N., Kleinen-von Königslöw, K., van der Noll, R. Regulating the new information intermediaries as gatekeepers of information diversity Info, (6), pp. 50-71., 2015. @article{, title = {Regulating the new information intermediaries as gatekeepers of information diversity}, author = {K. Kleinen-von K\"{o}nigsl\"{o}w and Rob van der Noll and N. Helberger}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1618.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-01}, journal = {Info}, number = {6}, pages = {50-71.}, note = { DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/info-05-2015-0034 }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. Online Price Discrimination and Data Protection Law 2015. @article{, title = {Online Price Discrimination and Data Protection Law}, author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius}, url = {http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2652665}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-09-01}, abstract = { Online shops can offer each website customer a different price – a practice called first degree price discrimination, or personalised pricing. An online shop can recognise a customer, for instance through a cookie, and categorise the customer as a rich or a poor person. The shop could, for instance, charge rich people higher prices. From an economic perspective, there are good arguments in favour of price discrimination. But many regard price discrimination as unfair or manipulative. This paper examines whether European data protection law applies to personalised pricing. Data protection law applies if personal data are processed. This paper argues that personalised pricing generally entails the processing of personal data. Therefore, data protection law generally applies to personalised pricing. That conclusion has several implications. For instance, data protection law requires a company to inform people about the purpose of processing their personal data. A company must inform customers if it personalises prices. }, note = { Forthcoming as a conference paper for the Amsterdam Privacy Conference 23-26 October 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Online shops can offer each website customer a different price – a practice called first degree price discrimination, or personalised pricing. An online shop can recognise a customer, for instance through a cookie, and categorise the customer as a rich or a poor person. The shop could, for instance, charge rich people higher prices. From an economic perspective, there are good arguments in favour of price discrimination. But many regard price discrimination as unfair or manipulative. This paper examines whether European data protection law applies to personalised pricing. Data protection law applies if personal data are processed. This paper argues that personalised pricing generally entails the processing of personal data. Therefore, data protection law generally applies to personalised pricing. That conclusion has several implications. For instance, data protection law requires a company to inform people about the purpose of processing their personal data. A company must inform customers if it personalises prices. |
| Hugenholtz, P. 2015. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie van de EU 15 januari 2015 (Ryanair / PR Aviation) en Hoge Raad 17 januari 2014 (Ryanair / PR Aviation)}, author = {P.B. Hugenholtz}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1611.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-08-25}, journal = {NJ}, number = {34/35}, pages = {3665-3667.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Arnbak, A. Maak de makers van software aansprakelijk 2015. @misc{, title = {Maak de makers van software aansprakelijk}, author = {A.M. Arnbak}, url = {https://www.axelarnbak.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/FD13.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-08-20}, note = { Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 12 augustus 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Dommering, E. 2015. @misc{, title = {De zaak Kreuk versus Danh Vo}, author = {E.J. Dommering}, url = {http://www.egbertdommering.nl/?p=778}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-08-20}, abstract = { Er is de laatste tijd veel publiciteit geweest over een proces dat de Nederlandse verzamelaar Bert Kreuk voor de Rechtbank Rotterdam tegen de van oorsprong Vietnamese kunstenaar Danh Vo heeft gevoerd. Kreuk stelt dat hij ter gelegenheid van de door het Haagse Gemeentemuseum in de tweede helft 2013 georganiseerde tentoonstelling uit zijn collectie met Danh Vo had afgesproken niet alleen dat deze een groot speciaal voor de tentoonstelling vervaardigd werk zou leveren, maar ook dat hij daarvan eigenaar zou worden. Het eerste had de Rechtbank al in een tussenvonnis van 23 juli 2014 bewezen geacht. Het tweede achtte de rechtbank, na door Kreuk naar voren gebrachte getuigen die bij de op 9 januari 2013 in het museum volgens hem gesloten deal aanwezig waren geweest te hebben gehoord, in het vonnis van 24 juni 2015 bewezen. Vervolgens zijn beide partijen in het openbaar ruzie gaan maken over dat laatste vonnis. Naar verluidt is er hoger beroep ingesteld. De zaak stelt principiële vragen over de relatie particuliere verzamelaar, openbaar museum en kunstenaar aan de orde waar ik een paar opmerkingen over wil maken, maar eerst nog even iets over de achtergrond en het vonnis van 24 juni 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Er is de laatste tijd veel publiciteit geweest over een proces dat de Nederlandse verzamelaar Bert Kreuk voor de Rechtbank Rotterdam tegen de van oorsprong Vietnamese kunstenaar Danh Vo heeft gevoerd. Kreuk stelt dat hij ter gelegenheid van de door het Haagse Gemeentemuseum in de tweede helft 2013 georganiseerde tentoonstelling uit zijn collectie met Danh Vo had afgesproken niet alleen dat deze een groot speciaal voor de tentoonstelling vervaardigd werk zou leveren, maar ook dat hij daarvan eigenaar zou worden. Het eerste had de Rechtbank al in een tussenvonnis van 23 juli 2014 bewezen geacht. Het tweede achtte de rechtbank, na door Kreuk naar voren gebrachte getuigen die bij de op 9 januari 2013 in het museum volgens hem gesloten deal aanwezig waren geweest te hebben gehoord, in het vonnis van 24 juni 2015 bewezen. Vervolgens zijn beide partijen in het openbaar ruzie gaan maken over dat laatste vonnis. Naar verluidt is er hoger beroep ingesteld. De zaak stelt principiële vragen over de relatie particuliere verzamelaar, openbaar museum en kunstenaar aan de orde waar ik een paar opmerkingen over wil maken, maar eerst nog even iets over de achtergrond en het vonnis van 24 juni 2015. |
| Hins, A. Onno Hoes vs. PowNed: ook een burgemeester heeft recht op privacy 2015. @misc{, title = {Onno Hoes vs. PowNed: ook een burgemeester heeft recht op privacy}, author = {A.W. Hins}, url = {http://jnmblog.nl/articles/onno-hoes-vs.-powned-ook-een-burgemeester-heeft-recht-op-privacy}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-08-20}, note = { Bijdrage aan webblog Journalistiek en Nieuwe Media van de Universiteit Leiden. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Guibault, L., Salamanca, O., van Gompel, S. 2015. @techreport{, title = {Remuneration of authors and performers for the use of their works and the fixations of their performances}, author = {L. Guibault and O.M. Salamanca and S.J. van Gompel}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1593.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-08-18}, abstract = { This study analyses the current situation regarding the level of remuneration paid to authors and performers in the music and audio-visual sectors. We compare, from both a legal and economic perspective, the existing national systems of remuneration for authors and performers and identify the relative advantages and disadvantages of those systems for them. We also explore the need to harmonise mechanisms affecting the remuneration of authors and performers, and to identify which ones are the best suited to achieve this. Their potential impact on distribution models and on the functioning of the Internal Market is also examined. Finally, the study outlines a series of policy recommendations based on the analysis conducted. The information and views set out in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. }, note = { This study was carried out for the European Commission by Europe Economics and Lucie Guibault, Olivia Salamanca and Stef van Gompel of the University of Amsterdam (IViR). ISBN 9789279471629 DOI: 10.2759/834167 See also: http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/commission-gathers-evidence-remuneration-authors-and-performers-use-their-works-and-fixations }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } This study analyses the current situation regarding the level of remuneration paid to authors and performers in the music and audio-visual sectors. We compare, from both a legal and economic perspective, the existing national systems of remuneration for authors and performers and identify the relative advantages and disadvantages of those systems for them. We also explore the need to harmonise mechanisms affecting the remuneration of authors and performers, and to identify which ones are the best suited to achieve this. Their potential impact on distribution models and on the functioning of the Internal Market is also examined. Finally, the study outlines a series of policy recommendations based on the analysis conducted. The information and views set out in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. |
| Bodó, B., Handke, C.W., Quintais, J., Vallbé, J. Knocking on Heaven's Door - User Preferences on Digital Cultural Distribution 2015. @article{, title = {Knocking on Heaven's Door - User Preferences on Digital Cultural Distribution}, author = {Bod\'{o}, B. and Quintais, J. and Vallb\'{e}, J. and Handke, C.W.}, url = {http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2630519}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-07-31}, abstract = { 14 July 2015. This paper explores the social, demographic and attitudinal basis of consumer support to a change from the status quo in digital cultural distribution. First we identify how different online and offline, legal and illegal, free and paying content acquisition channels are used in the Dutch media market using a cluster-based classification of respondents according to their cultural consumption. Second, we assess the effect of cultural consumption on the support to the introduction of a Copyright Compensation System (CCS), which, for a small monthly fee would legalize currently infringing online social practices such as private copying from illegal sources and online sharing of copyrighted works. Finally, we link these two analyses to identify the factors that drive the dynamics of change in digital cultural consumption habits. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } 14 July 2015.<br /> This paper explores the social, demographic and attitudinal basis of consumer support to a change from the status quo in digital cultural distribution. First we identify how different online and offline, legal and illegal, free and paying content acquisition channels are used in the Dutch media market using a cluster-based classification of respondents according to their cultural consumption. Second, we assess the effect of cultural consumption on the support to the introduction of a Copyright Compensation System (CCS), which, for a small monthly fee would legalize currently infringing online social practices such as private copying from illegal sources and online sharing of copyrighted works. Finally, we link these two analyses to identify the factors that drive the dynamics of change in digital cultural consumption habits. |
| Eskens, S., van Daalen, O., van Eijk, N. Ten standards for oversight and transparency of national intelligence services Instituut voor Informatierecht 2015. @techreport{, title = {Ten standards for oversight and transparency of national intelligence services}, author = {Eskens, S. and van Daalen, O. and van Eijk, N.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1591.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-07-23}, institution = {Instituut voor Informatierecht}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. 2015. @misc{, title = {Privacy van consumenten}, author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1589.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-07-17}, note = { Hoofdstuk in: Handboek Consumentenrecht: Een overzicht van de rechtspositie van de consument, prof. mr. E.H. Hondius, mr. G.J. Rijken (red.), 2015. ISBN 9789462510753. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| van Eijk, N. 2015. @misc{, title = {Telecommunicatierecht}, author = {N.A.N.M. van Eijk}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1590.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-07-17}, note = { Hoofdstuk in: Handboek Consumentenrecht: Een overzicht van de rechtspositie van de consument, prof. mr. E.H. Hondius, mr. G.J. Rijken (red.), 2015. ISBN 9789462510753. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Arnbak, A. Europa gaat te traag met beleid voor versleuteling 2015. @misc{, title = {Europa gaat te traag met beleid voor versleuteling}, author = {A.M. Arnbak}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1588.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-07-16}, note = { Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 15 juli 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Kerste, M., Poort, J., Rougoor, W. Waarde verlenging 2100 MH-z vergunningen 2015. @techreport{, title = {Waarde verlenging 2100 MH-z vergunningen}, author = {M. Kerste and W. Rougoor and J.P. Poort}, url = {http://www.seo.nl/uploads/media/2015-33_Waarde_verlening_2100_MH-z_vergunningen.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-07-14}, abstract = { Op 31 december 2016 lopen de huidige 2100 MHz-vergunningen van KPN, Vodafone en T-Mobile af. Deze vergunningen worden verlengd, in beginsel tot 1 januari 2021. Op grond van het geldende reguleringskader is de vergunninghouder bij verlenging van een vergunning een vergoeding aan de Staat verschuldigd. Dit rapport onderzoekt de wijze waarop de waarde van verlenging binnen de beleidsmatige en procedurele randvoorwaarden te bepalen is en berekent verlengingsprijzen aan de hand van de voorgestelde methode. De uitkomst van de multibandveiling eind 2012 neemt daarbij een centrale rol in, en wordt gecombineerd met een model voor de ontwikkeling van de EBITDA over de looptijd. Om de verlengingsprijs voor 2100 MHz-vergunningen te berekenen, is de bruikbaarheid van de prijzen in de multibandveiling voor 2100 MHz-vergunningen onderzocht alsmede die van de prijzen voor 1800 MHz-vergunningen. Het rapport concludeert dat een verlengingsprijs op basis van de 2100 MHz-band aannemelijk een ondergrens vormt van de juiste verlengingsprijs en die op basis van de 1800 MHz-band een bovengrens, waarbij het in de rede ligt uit te gaan van het midden van deze bandbreedte. Dit leidt bij een verlengingsduur van vier jaar tot een verlengingsprijs van €5.907.000 miljoen voor een vergunning van 2 × 5 MHz. Voor alle drie de partijen geldt een verlengingsprijs op basis van een bezit van 2 × 20 MHz. De ontwikkelde methodiek zal als basis dienen voor de ministeriële regeling waarin het eenmalig bedrag voor verlenging wordt geregeld. }, note = { Amsterdam, juli 2015, SEO Economisch Onderzoek, 2015-33. In opdracht van het ministerie van Economische Zaken. ISBN: 9789067337793. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } Op 31 december 2016 lopen de huidige 2100 MHz-vergunningen van KPN, Vodafone en T-Mobile af. Deze vergunningen worden verlengd, in beginsel tot 1 januari 2021. Op grond van het geldende reguleringskader is de vergunninghouder bij verlenging van een vergunning een vergoeding aan de Staat verschuldigd. Dit rapport onderzoekt de wijze waarop de waarde van verlenging binnen de beleidsmatige en procedurele randvoorwaarden te bepalen is en berekent verlengingsprijzen aan de hand van de voorgestelde methode. De uitkomst van de multibandveiling eind 2012 neemt daarbij een centrale rol in, en wordt gecombineerd met een model voor de ontwikkeling van de EBITDA over de looptijd. Om de verlengingsprijs voor 2100 MHz-vergunningen te berekenen, is de bruikbaarheid van de prijzen in de multibandveiling voor 2100 MHz-vergunningen onderzocht alsmede die van de prijzen voor 1800 MHz-vergunningen. Het rapport concludeert dat een verlengingsprijs op basis van de 2100 MHz-band aannemelijk een ondergrens vormt van de juiste verlengingsprijs en die op basis van de 1800 MHz-band een bovengrens, waarbij het in de rede ligt uit te gaan van het midden van deze bandbreedte. Dit leidt bij een verlengingsduur van vier jaar tot een verlengingsprijs van €5.907.000 miljoen voor een vergunning van 2 × 5 MHz. Voor alle drie de partijen geldt een verlengingsprijs op basis van een bezit van 2 × 20 MHz. De ontwikkelde methodiek zal als basis dienen voor de ministeriële regeling waarin het eenmalig bedrag voor verlenging wordt geregeld. |
| Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. European Journal of Migration and Law, pp. 259-272., 2015, ( Case report. ). @article{, title = {Access to Personal Data and the Right to Good Governance during Asylum Procedures after the CJEU's YS and M. and S. judgment (C-141/12 and C-372/12)}, author = {Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.}, url = {http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/15718166-12342080}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-07-10}, journal = {European Journal of Migration and Law}, pages = {259-272.}, abstract = { In the YS. and M. and S. judgment, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on three procedures in which Dutch judges asked for clarification on the right of asylum seekers to have access to the documents regarding the decision on asylum applications. The judgment is relevant for interpreting the concept of personal data and the scope of the right of access under the Data Protection Directive, and the right to good administration in the eu Charter of Fundamental Rights. At first glance, the judgment seems disappointing from the viewpoint of individual rights. Nevertheless, in our view the judgment provides sufficient grounds for effective access rights to the minutes in future asylum cases. }, note = { Case report. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } In the YS. and M. and S. judgment, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on three procedures in which Dutch judges asked for clarification on the right of asylum seekers to have access to the documents regarding the decision on asylum applications. The judgment is relevant for interpreting the concept of personal data and the scope of the right of access under the Data Protection Directive, and the right to good administration in the eu Charter of Fundamental Rights. At first glance, the judgment seems disappointing from the viewpoint of individual rights. Nevertheless, in our view the judgment provides sufficient grounds for effective access rights to the minutes in future asylum cases. |
| Kabel, J. Themanummer: openbaarheid van publiek bekostigde informatie en het auteursrecht AMI, (3), pp. 65-67., 2015. @article{, title = {Themanummer: openbaarheid van publiek bekostigde informatie en het auteursrecht}, author = {J.J.C. Kabel}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1583.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-07-07}, journal = {AMI}, number = {3}, pages = {65-67.}, abstract = { We hebben er niet naar gezocht, het is ons in de schoot geworpen: een themanummer. 'Open overheid' en 'open access', die twee onderwerpen hebben alleen nog een verbindende redactionele inleiding nodig en voilà: alles wat een auteursrechtjurist altijd al had willen weten over de vraag waarom het zo is dat we vrijelijk toegang moeten mogen hebben tot informatie waarvoor we zelf hebben betaald. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } We hebben er niet naar gezocht, het is ons in de schoot geworpen: een themanummer. 'Open overheid' en 'open access', die twee onderwerpen hebben alleen nog een verbindende redactionele inleiding nodig en voilà: alles wat een auteursrechtjurist altijd al had willen weten over de vraag waarom het zo is dat we vrijelijk toegang moeten mogen hebben tot informatie waarvoor we zelf hebben betaald. |
| Guibault, L., Handke, C.W., Vallbé, J. Is Europe Falling Behind in Data Mining? Copyright's Impact on Data Mining in Academic Research 2015. @article{, title = {Is Europe Falling Behind in Data Mining? Copyright's Impact on Data Mining in Academic Research}, author = {Guibault, L. and Handke, C.W. and Vallb\'{e}, J.}, url = {http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2608513}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-07-02}, abstract = { This empirical paper discusses how copyright affects data mining (DM) by academic researchers. Based on bibliometric data, we show that where DM for academic research requires the express consent of rights holders: (1) DM makes up a significantly lower share of total research output; and (2) stronger rule-of-law is associated with less DM research. To our knowledge, this is the first time that an empirical study bears out a significant negative association between copyright protection and innovation. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This empirical paper discusses how copyright affects data mining (DM) by academic researchers. Based on bibliometric data, we show that where DM for academic research requires the express consent of rights holders: (1) DM makes up a significantly lower share of total research output; and (2) stronger rule-of-law is associated with less DM research. To our knowledge, this is the first time that an empirical study bears out a significant negative association between copyright protection and innovation. |
| Guibault, L. Study on Copyright Limitations and Exceptions for Museums 2015. @techreport{, title = {Study on Copyright Limitations and Exceptions for Museums}, author = {L. Guibault}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1582.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-07-02}, abstract = { This study investigates the issue of limitations and exceptions to copyright for the benefit of museums, with a view to strengthening the international understanding of the need to have adequate limitations, exploring existing and proposed models of protection, and moving towards agreement regarding specific exceptions or limitations. }, note = { Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights, Thirtieth Session, Geneva, June 29 to July 3, 2015. Study in collaboration with E. Logeais. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } This study investigates the issue of limitations and exceptions to copyright for the benefit of museums, with a view to strengthening the international understanding of the need to have adequate limitations, exploring existing and proposed models of protection, and moving towards agreement regarding specific exceptions or limitations. |
| van Eijk, N. KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi, (135), pp. 7808-7809., 2015. @article{, title = {Kroniek Telecommunicatierecht}, author = {N.A.N.M. van Eijk}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1579.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-06-30}, journal = {KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi}, number = {135}, pages = {7808-7809.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Breemen, J., Breemen, V. KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi, (135), pp. 7805-7808, 2015. @article{, title = {Kroniek Mediarecht}, author = {J.M. Breemen and V.E. Breemen}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1576.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-06-25}, journal = {KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi}, number = {135}, pages = {7805-7808}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. Personal data processing for behavioural targeting: which legal basis? International Data Privacy Law, 2015. @article{, title = {Personal data processing for behavioural targeting: which legal basis?}, author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius}, url = {http://idpl.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/06/23/idpl.ipv011.abstract?keytype=ref&ijkey=vlrPCGCUMXW8kAz}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-06-25}, journal = {International Data Privacy Law}, abstract = { Key Points: The European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights only allows personal data processing if a data controller has a legal basis for the processing. This paper argues that, in most circumstances, the only available legal basis for the processing of personal data for behavioural targeting is the data subject's unambiguous consent. Furthermore, the paper argues that the cookie consent requirement from the e-Privacy Directive does not provide a legal basis for the processing of personal data. Therefore, even if companies could use an opt-out system to comply with the e-Privacy Directive's consent requirement for using a tracking cookie, they would generally have to obtain the data subject's unambiguous consent if they process personal data for behavioural targeting. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Key Points: The European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights only allows personal data processing if a data controller has a legal basis for the processing. This paper argues that, in most circumstances, the only available legal basis for the processing of personal data for behavioural targeting is the data subject's unambiguous consent. Furthermore, the paper argues that the cookie consent requirement from the e-Privacy Directive does not provide a legal basis for the processing of personal data. Therefore, even if companies could use an opt-out system to comply with the e-Privacy Directive's consent requirement for using a tracking cookie, they would generally have to obtain the data subject's unambiguous consent if they process personal data for behavioural targeting. |
| van Eechoud, M. Kruisende wegen: Auteursrecht in het wetsvoorstel Open Overheid AMI, (3), pp. 75-83., 2015. @article{, title = {Kruisende wegen: Auteursrecht in het wetsvoorstel Open Overheid}, author = {M.M.M. van Eechoud}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1574.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-06-23}, journal = {AMI}, number = {3}, pages = {75-83.}, abstract = { Standaardlicenties zoals Creative Commons zijn een belangrijk middel voor overheidsorganen om het (her)gebruik van overheidsinformatie te stimuleren. De uitoefening van het privaatrechtelijke auteurs- en databankenrecht versterkt zo de publiekrechtelijk geregelde openbaarheid van bestuur. Kan dat zo blijven als het initiatiefwetsvoorstel Open Overheid wet wordt? Het voorstel zet de verhouding tussen openbaarheidswetgeving en intellectuele eigendomsrechten op scherp. Dit artikel beziet de voorgenomen wetswijzigingen in het licht van de tweewegenleer, het leerstuk dat bepaalt hoe privaatrechtelijk overheidshandelen mag worden ingezet voor publieke doelen. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Standaardlicenties zoals Creative Commons zijn een belangrijk middel voor overheidsorganen om het (her)gebruik van overheidsinformatie te stimuleren. De uitoefening van het privaatrechtelijke auteurs- en databankenrecht versterkt zo de publiekrechtelijk geregelde openbaarheid van bestuur. Kan dat zo blijven als het initiatiefwetsvoorstel Open Overheid wet wordt? Het voorstel zet de verhouding tussen openbaarheidswetgeving en intellectuele eigendomsrechten op scherp. Dit artikel beziet de voorgenomen wetswijzigingen in het licht van de tweewegenleer, het leerstuk dat bepaalt hoe privaatrechtelijk overheidshandelen mag worden ingezet voor publieke doelen. |
| Kannekens, E., Salamanca, O., van Eechoud, M. 2015. @techreport{, title = {ALAI 2015 Conference 'Renumeration for the Use of Works. Exclusivity vs. Other Approaches, National Report The Netherlands}, author = {E.P.M. Kannekens and O.M. Salamanca and M.M.M. van Eechoud}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1575.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-06-23}, note = { ALAI Conference 2015, Bonn (Germany) 18-20 June 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| Arnbak, A. Lobby in Europa zorgt voor absurd internetbeleid 2015. @misc{, title = {Lobby in Europa zorgt voor absurd internetbeleid}, author = {A.M. Arnbak}, url = {https://www.axelarnbak.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/fd11.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-06-18}, note = { Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 17 juni 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Handke, C.W. Joint Copyrights Management by Collecting Societies and Online Platforms: An Economic Analysis 2015, ( June 9, 2015, 33 pp. ). @article{, title = {Joint Copyrights Management by Collecting Societies and Online Platforms: An Economic Analysis}, author = {Handke, C.W.}, url = {http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2616442}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-06-11}, abstract = { This paper discusses the effects of technological change on joint (copy)rights management (JRM). The economic literature discusses JRM as a response to relatively high transaction costs in complex markets for copyright works. Based on a formal analysis, we show that JRM reduces the average transaction costs per transaction and the total number of transactions under a broad range of conditions. Throughout the 20th Century, JRM was mostly conducted by copyrights holder collectives. Recently, private for-profit online platforms are taking on core functions of JRM. Our formal analysis yields two essential results: (1) the efficient scale and scope of JRM will increase as copyright works are increasingly traded via digital ICT networks; (2) a change from collective JRM on behalf of rights holders to commercial intermediation weakens the position of rights holders, and will aggravate problems with the private provision of copyright works with public good attributes. }, note = { June 9, 2015, 33 pp. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This paper discusses the effects of technological change on joint (copy)rights management (JRM). The economic literature discusses JRM as a response to relatively high transaction costs in complex markets for copyright works. Based on a formal analysis, we show that JRM reduces the average transaction costs per transaction and the total number of transactions under a broad range of conditions. Throughout the 20th Century, JRM was mostly conducted by copyrights holder collectives. Recently, private for-profit online platforms are taking on core functions of JRM. Our formal analysis yields two essential results: (1) the efficient scale and scope of JRM will increase as copyright works are increasingly traded via digital ICT networks; (2) a change from collective JRM on behalf of rights holders to commercial intermediation weakens the position of rights holders, and will aggravate problems with the private provision of copyright works with public good attributes. |
| Bodó, B., Handke, C.W., Vallbé, J. Going means trouble and staying makes it double: the value of licensing recorded music online Journal of Cultural Economics, 2015. @article{, title = {Going means trouble and staying makes it double: the value of licensing recorded music online}, author = {Bod\'{o}, B. and Handke, C.W. and Vallb\'{e}, J.}, url = {http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10824-015-9251-8}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-06-11}, journal = {Journal of Cultural Economics}, abstract = { This paper discusses whether a copyright compensation system (CCS) for recorded music\textemdashendowing private Internet subscribers with the right to download and use works in return for a fee\textemdashwould be welfare increasing. It reports on the results of a discrete choice experiment conducted with a representative sample of the Dutch population consisting of 4986 participants. Under some conservative assumptions, we find that applied only to recorded music, a mandatory CCS could increase the welfare of rights holders and users in the Netherlands by over €600 million per year (over €35 per capita). This far exceeds current rights holder revenues from the market of recorded music of ca. €144 million per year. A monthly CCS fee of ca. €1.74 as a surcharge on Dutch Internet subscriptions would raise the same amount of revenues to rights holders as the current market for recorded music. With a voluntary CCS, the estimated welfare gains to users and rights holders are even greater for CCS fees below €20 on the user side. A voluntary CCS would also perform better in the long run, as it could retain a greater extent of market coordination. The results of our choice experiment indicate that a well-designed CCS for recorded music would simultaneously make users and rights holders better off. This result holds even if we correct for frequently observed rates of overestimation in contingent valuation studies. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This paper discusses whether a copyright compensation system (CCS) for recorded music—endowing private Internet subscribers with the right to download and use works in return for a fee—would be welfare increasing. It reports on the results of a discrete choice experiment conducted with a representative sample of the Dutch population consisting of 4986 participants. Under some conservative assumptions, we find that applied only to recorded music, a mandatory CCS could increase the welfare of rights holders and users in the Netherlands by over €600 million per year (over €35 per capita). This far exceeds current rights holder revenues from the market of recorded music of ca. €144 million per year. A monthly CCS fee of ca. €1.74 as a surcharge on Dutch Internet subscriptions would raise the same amount of revenues to rights holders as the current market for recorded music. With a voluntary CCS, the estimated welfare gains to users and rights holders are even greater for CCS fees below €20 on the user side. A voluntary CCS would also perform better in the long run, as it could retain a greater extent of market coordination. The results of our choice experiment indicate that a well-designed CCS for recorded music would simultaneously make users and rights holders better off. This result holds even if we correct for frequently observed rates of overestimation in contingent valuation studies. |
| Gervais, D.J. Collective Management of Copyright and Related Rights, 3rd ed. Kluwer Law International, 2015. @book{Gervais2015, title = {Collective Management of Copyright and Related Rights, 3rd ed.}, author = {Gervais, D.J.}, url = {https://lrus.wolterskluwer.com/store/product/collective-management-of-copyright-and-related-rights-third-edition/}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-06-06}, publisher = {Kluwer Law International}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {book} } |
| Arnbak, A. Software is ook bij bitcoin altijd politiek 2015. @misc{, title = {Software is ook bij bitcoin altijd politiek}, author = {A.M. Arnbak}, url = {https://www.axelarnbak.nl/2015/05/20/10e-column-financieele-dagblad-machtsstrijd-software-is-ook-bij-bitcoin-altijd-politiek/}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-06-05}, note = { Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 20 mei 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| McGonagle, T. The development of freedom of expression and information within the UN: leaps and bounds or fits and starts? 2015, ( In: <a href="http://www.cambridge.org/nl/academic/subjects/law/un-and-international-organisations/united-nations-and-freedom-expression-and-information-critical-perspectives?format=HB" target="_blank">The United Nations and Freedom of Expression and Information: Critical Perspectives</a>, T. McGonagle & Y. Donders (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2015, pp. 1-51. ). @inbook{McGonagle2015, title = {The development of freedom of expression and information within the UN: leaps and bounds or fits and starts?}, author = {McGonagle, T.}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-06-05}, abstract = { This chapter tells the story of how the rights to freedom of expression and information have been shaped by the United Nations’ (UN) institutional dynamics over the years. It gives an account of how the growth of the rights to freedom of expression and information has been both stimulated and stymied by different factors in the particular institutional context of the UN. It traces the broad contours of the two rights by connecting the largest conceptual, normative, historical and institutional dots. The chapter opens with a brief exploration of the contiguous nature of the rights to freedom of expression and information. This necessarily involves reflection on the instrumental role that the media and new communications technologies can play in the realization of both rights in practice. The remainder of the chapter has an overtly institutional focus. Its next three substantive sections correspond to three broad \textendash roughly chronological, but occasionally overlapping - phases in the development of freedom of expression and information at the UN. Each period is denoted by its key features or aspirations: trail-blazing, consolidation and expansion, and the quest for coherence and consistency. Various thematic challenges have presented themselves during these periods, a number of which are woven into the chapter’s narrative. Finally, after offering some substantive conclusions, the chapter will explain the objectives and structure of the book as a whole. }, note = { In: <a href="http://www.cambridge.org/nl/academic/subjects/law/un-and-international-organisations/united-nations-and-freedom-expression-and-information-critical-perspectives?format=HB" target="_blank">The United Nations and Freedom of Expression and Information: Critical Perspectives</a>, T. McGonagle & Y. Donders (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2015, pp. 1-51. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {inbook} } This chapter tells the story of how the rights to freedom of expression and information have been shaped by the United Nations’ (UN) institutional dynamics over the years. It gives an account of how the growth of the rights to freedom of expression and information has been both stimulated and stymied by different factors in the particular institutional context of the UN. It traces the broad contours of the two rights by connecting the largest conceptual, normative, historical and institutional dots.<br /> The chapter opens with a brief exploration of the contiguous nature of the rights to freedom of expression and information. This necessarily involves reflection on the instrumental role that the media and new communications technologies can play in the realization of both rights in practice. The remainder of the chapter has an overtly institutional focus. Its next three substantive sections correspond to three broad – roughly chronological, but occasionally overlapping - phases in the development of freedom of expression and information at the UN. Each period is denoted by its key features or aspirations: trail-blazing, consolidation and expansion, and the quest for coherence and consistency. Various thematic challenges have presented themselves during these periods, a number of which are woven into the chapter’s narrative. Finally, after offering some substantive conclusions, the chapter will explain the objectives and structure of the book as a whole. |
| Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. Improving privacy protection in the area of behavioural targeting 2015. @book{, title = {Improving privacy protection in the area of behavioural targeting}, author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius}, url = {http://www.kluwerlaw.com/Catalogue/titleinfo.htm?ProdID=9041159908}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-06-04}, abstract = { This book provides you with a highly readable overview of the policy issues underlying behavioural targeting, and explains how the law could improve on privacy protection. }, note = { Alphen aan den Rijn, Kluwer Law International, 2015, 432 pp. ISBN 9789041159908. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {book} } This book provides you with a highly readable overview of the policy issues underlying behavioural targeting, and explains how the law could improve on privacy protection. |
| Donders, Y., McGonagle, T. The United Nations and Freedom of Expression and Information: Critical Perspectives 2015. @book{, title = {The United Nations and Freedom of Expression and Information: Critical Perspectives}, author = {Y.M. Donders and T. McGonagle}, url = {http://www.cambridge.org/nl/academic/subjects/law/un-and-international-organisations/united-nations-and-freedom-expression-and-information-critical-perspectives?format=HB}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-06-04}, abstract = { This book provides a critical and uniquely comprehensive examination of the main UN standards and mechanisms dealing with the rights to freedom of expression and information. It details the chequered history of both rights within the UN system and evaluates the suitability of the system for overcoming contemporary challenges and threats to both rights. The book’s institutional focus comprises five international treaties, UNESCO and the UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression. Different aspects of freedom of expression and information are foregrounded in different treaties, to ensure the effective enjoyment of both rights by particular groups, eg. children or persons with disabilities, or the meaningful application of the rights in particular situations, eg. combating racism. The book’s thematic focus examines a selection of themes that are prompting fresh thinking about the substance and scope of the rights to freedom of expression and information, eg. the impact of new communication technologies. }, note = { Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, June 2015, 534 pp. ISBN: 9781107083868. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {book} } This book provides a critical and uniquely comprehensive examination of the main UN standards and mechanisms dealing with the rights to freedom of expression and information. It details the chequered history of both rights within the UN system and evaluates the suitability of the system for overcoming contemporary challenges and threats to both rights. The book’s institutional focus comprises five international treaties, UNESCO and the UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression. Different aspects of freedom of expression and information are foregrounded in different treaties, to ensure the effective enjoyment of both rights by particular groups, eg. children or persons with disabilities, or the meaningful application of the rights in particular situations, eg. combating racism. The book’s thematic focus examines a selection of themes that are prompting fresh thinking about the substance and scope of the rights to freedom of expression and information, eg. the impact of new communication technologies. |
| Kulk, S., Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. De implicaties van het Google Spain-arrest voor de vrijheid van meningsuiting NJCM-Bulletin, (1), pp. 3-19., 2015. @article{, title = {De implicaties van het Google Spain-arrest voor de vrijheid van meningsuiting}, author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius and S. Kulk}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1566.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-06-04}, journal = {NJCM-Bulletin}, number = {1}, pages = {3-19.}, abstract = { In deze bijdrage wordt het \emph{Google Spain-}arrest van het Hof van Justitie van de Europese Unie besproken, evenals de ontwikkelingen na het arrest. Centraal staat de vraag naar de gevolgen van het arrest voor de vrijheid van meningsuiting. De auteurs betogen dat het Hof onvoldoende aandacht schenkt aan de vrijheid van meningsuiting. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } In deze bijdrage wordt het Google Spain-arrest van het Hof van Justitie van de Europese Unie besproken, evenals de ontwikkelingen na het arrest. Centraal staat de vraag naar de gevolgen van het arrest voor de vrijheid van meningsuiting. De auteurs betogen dat het Hof onvoldoende aandacht schenkt aan de vrijheid van meningsuiting. |
| van der Sloot, B. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, (80), pp. 25-50., 2015, ( DOI: <a href="http://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.cp">http://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.cp</a> ). @article{, title = {Privacy as Personality Right: Why the ECtHR's Focus on Ulterior Interests Might Prove Indispensable in the Age of }, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1555.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-05-22}, journal = {Utrecht Journal of International and European Law}, number = {80}, pages = {25-50.}, abstract = { Article 8 ECHR was adopted as a classic negative right, which provides the citizen protection from unlawful and arbitrary interference by the state with his private and family life, home and communication. The ECtHR, however, has gradually broadened its scope so that the right to privacy encroaches upon other provisions embodied in the Convention, includes rights and freedoms explicitly left out of the ECHR by the drafters of the Convention and functions as the main pillar on which the Court has built its practice of opening up the Convention for new rights and freedoms. Consequently, Article 8 ECHR has been transformed from a classic privacy right to a personality right, providing protection to the personal development of individuals. Apart from its theoretical significance, this shift might prove indispensable in the age of Big Data, as personality rights protect a different type of interest, which is far more easy to substantiate in the new technological paradigm than those associated with the right to privacy. }, note = { DOI: <a href="http://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.cp">http://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.cp</a> }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Article 8 ECHR was adopted as a classic negative right, which provides the citizen protection from unlawful and arbitrary interference by the state with his private and family life, home and communication. The ECtHR, however, has gradually broadened its scope so that the right to privacy encroaches upon other provisions embodied in the Convention, includes rights and freedoms explicitly left out of the ECHR by the drafters of the Convention and functions as the main pillar on which the Court has built its practice of opening up the Convention for new rights and freedoms. Consequently, Article 8 ECHR has been transformed from a classic privacy right to a personality right, providing protection to the personal development of individuals. Apart from its theoretical significance, this shift might prove indispensable in the age of Big Data, as personality rights protect a different type of interest, which is far more easy to substantiate in the new technological paradigm than those associated with the right to privacy. |
| Eskens, S. Computerrecht, 2015 (3), pp. 125-131, 2015. @article{, title = {Ongerichte interceptie, of het verwerven van bulk-communicatie, en waarom de Grondwet en het EVRM onvoldoende tegenwicht bieden}, author = {Eskens, S.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/eskens_computerrecht2015/}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-05-22}, journal = {Computerrecht}, volume = {2015}, number = {3}, pages = {125-131}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| van der Sloot, B. Book review: 'Reforming European Data Protection Law' 2015, ( Boekbespreking van <em>Reforming European Data Protection Law</em>, S. Gutwirth, R. Leenes en P. de Hert (eds.), Springer 2015. ). @misc{, title = {Book review: 'Reforming European Data Protection Law'}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1556.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-05-21}, journal = {European Data Protection Law Review}, number = {1}, pages = {85-87.}, note = { Boekbespreking van <em>Reforming European Data Protection Law</em>, S. Gutwirth, R. Leenes en P. de Hert (eds.), Springer 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| van der Sloot, B. 2015. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens 27 januari 2015 (Paradiso & Campanelli / Itali\"{e})}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1557.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-05-20}, journal = {European Human Rights Cases}, number = {5}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. Het mijnenveld van het informatierecht Mr., (5), pp. 62-67, 2015. @article{, title = {Het mijnenveld van het informatierecht}, author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1552.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-05-12}, journal = {Mr.}, number = {5}, pages = {62-67}, abstract = { In theorie lijkt de bescherming van persoonsgegevens op orde: internetbedrijven moeten mensen informeren over wat er met hun gegevens gebeurt, en doorgaans toestemming vragen voor ze die gegevens gebruiken. Maar in de praktijk schiet die ‘geïnformeerde toestemming’ als privacybeschermingsmaatregel tekort. Om privacy beter te beschermen moet volgens onderzoeker Frederik Borgesius de privacywetgeving beter worden nageleefd en gehandhaafd én op de schop. Hij pleit voor een breder privacydebat. “We móeten dat mijnenveld in.” }, note = { Interview. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } In theorie lijkt de bescherming van persoonsgegevens op orde: internetbedrijven moeten mensen informeren over wat er met hun gegevens gebeurt, en doorgaans toestemming vragen voor ze die gegevens gebruiken. Maar in de praktijk schiet die ‘geïnformeerde toestemming’ als privacybeschermingsmaatregel tekort. Om privacy beter te beschermen moet volgens onderzoeker Frederik Borgesius de privacywetgeving beter worden nageleefd en gehandhaafd én op de schop. Hij pleit voor een breder privacydebat. “We móeten dat mijnenveld in.” |
| Helberger, N. International Journal of Communication, pp. 1324-1340, 2015. @article{, title = {Merely Facilitating or Actively Stimulating Diverse Media Choices? Public Service Media at the Crossroad}, author = {N. Helberger}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1549.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-05-07}, journal = {International Journal of Communication}, pages = {1324-1340}, abstract = { Personalized recommendations provide new opportunities to engage with audiences and influence media choices. Should the public-service media use such algorithmic profiling and targeting to guide audiences and stimulate more diverse choices? And if they do, is this a brave new world we would like to live in? This article outlines new opportunities for the public-service media to fulfill their commitment to media diversity and highlights some of the ethical and normative considerations that will play a role. The article concludes with a call for a new body of “algorithmic media ethics.” }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Personalized recommendations provide new opportunities to engage with audiences and influence media choices. Should the public-service media use such algorithmic profiling and targeting to guide audiences and stimulate more diverse choices? And if they do, is this a brave new world we would like to live in? This article outlines new opportunities for the public-service media to fulfill their commitment to media diversity and highlights some of the ethical and normative considerations that will play a role. The article concludes with a call for a new body of “algorithmic media ethics.” |
| Dommering, E. 'Van de koning zelf mag het ook' 2015. @misc{, title = {'Van de koning zelf mag het ook'}, author = {E.J. Dommering}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1551.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-05-06}, note = { Interview in Het Parool van 6 mei 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Dommering, E., van Eijk, N. Verzameldrift 'big data' grijpt om zich heen 2015. @misc{, title = {Verzameldrift 'big data' grijpt om zich heen}, author = {E.J. Dommering and N.A.N.M. van Eijk}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1550.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-05-05}, abstract = { Het bewaren van communicatiegegevens van alle Nederlandse telefoon- en internetgebruikers is terecht door het Europese Hof van Justitie verboden. }, note = { Opinie in De Volkskrant van 5 mei 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Het bewaren van communicatiegegevens van alle Nederlandse telefoon- en internetgebruikers is terecht door het Europese Hof van Justitie verboden. |
| Arnbak, A. Internet der dingen zwaar beveiligen 2015. @misc{, title = {Internet der dingen zwaar beveiligen}, author = {A.M. Arnbak}, url = {https://www.axelarnbak.nl/2015/04/24/9e-column-financieele-dagblad-levensgevaarlijk-internet-der-dingen-zwaar-beveiligen/}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-28}, note = { Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 22 april 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| van der Sloot, B. Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie van de EU 11 december 2014 (Ryneš / Úřad pro ochranu osobních údajů) 2015, ( C-212/13. ). @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie van de EU 11 december 2014 (Ryne\v{s} / \'{U}\v{r}ad pro ochranu osobn\'{i}ch \'{u}dajr{u})}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1542.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-24}, journal = {European Human Rights Cases}, number = {3}, note = { C-212/13. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| van der Sloot, B. Information & Communication Technology Law, 24 (1), pp. 74-103., 2015. @article{, title = {How to assess privacy violations in the age of Big Data? Analysing the three different tests developed by the ECtHR and adding for a fourth one}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13600834.2015.1009714#}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-24}, journal = {Information & Communication Technology Law}, volume = {24}, number = {1}, pages = {74-103.}, abstract = { It is commonly believed that privacy cases are resolved by balancing the private interest (e.g. personal autonomy) and the common interest (e.g. national security) involved with a particular privacy violation. Clearly, this approach no longer holds in the age of Big Data, in which massive amounts of personal data are gathered without a pre-established goal. Not only is the balancing test inapplicable because it is often unclear how certain data gathering and processing initiatives improve the societal interest, but it is also hard to demonstrate whether and if so how an individual has suffered from such massive data processing systems. Besides the balancing test, however, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) applies two other tests when dealing with privacy issues. Both have an added value when applied to privacy violations following from Big Data processes. Still, if Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is to retain its significance in the new technological environment, it might be necessary to develop a new test, the rudiments of which might already be found in the Court's case law. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } It is commonly believed that privacy cases are resolved by balancing the private interest (e.g. personal autonomy) and the common interest (e.g. national security) involved with a particular privacy violation. Clearly, this approach no longer holds in the age of Big Data, in which massive amounts of personal data are gathered without a pre-established goal. Not only is the balancing test inapplicable because it is often unclear how certain data gathering and processing initiatives improve the societal interest, but it is also hard to demonstrate whether and if so how an individual has suffered from such massive data processing systems. Besides the balancing test, however, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) applies two other tests when dealing with privacy issues. Both have an added value when applied to privacy violations following from Big Data processes. Still, if Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is to retain its significance in the new technological environment, it might be necessary to develop a new test, the rudiments of which might already be found in the Court's case law. |
| Hijmans, H. Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht, (7), pp. 245-252, 2015. @article{, title = {De ongeldigverklaring van de Dataretentierichtlijn: een nieuwe stap in de bescherming van de grondrechten door het Hof van Justitie}, author = {H. Hijmans}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1544.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-24}, journal = {Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht}, number = {7}, pages = {245-252}, abstract = { Op 8 april 2014 heeft het Hof van Justitie een opmerkelijk arrest gewezen in de gevoegde zaken Digital Rights Ireland en Seitlinger. Het heeft voor het eerst wegens strijd met het EUHandvest voor de grondrechten een richtlijn in zijn geheel vernietigd. Het Hof van Justitie heeft geoordeeld dat de Uniewetgever met de vaststelling van de Dataretentierichtlijn de door het evenredigheidsbeginsel gestelde grenzen heeft overschreden die hij in het licht van de artikelen 7, 8 en 52 lid 1 van het Handvest in acht dient te nemen. Het heeft geen beperking in de tijd aangebracht (het Hof van Justitie wijkt hiermee af van de conclusie van advocaat-generaal Cruz Villalón, overwegingen 154-158). }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Op 8 april 2014 heeft het Hof van Justitie een opmerkelijk arrest gewezen in de gevoegde zaken Digital Rights Ireland en Seitlinger. Het heeft voor het eerst wegens strijd met het EUHandvest voor de grondrechten een richtlijn in zijn geheel vernietigd. Het Hof van Justitie heeft geoordeeld dat de Uniewetgever met de vaststelling van de Dataretentierichtlijn de door het evenredigheidsbeginsel gestelde grenzen heeft overschreden die hij in het licht van de artikelen 7, 8 en 52 lid 1 van het Handvest in acht dient te nemen. Het heeft geen beperking in de tijd aangebracht (het Hof van Justitie wijkt hiermee af van de conclusie van advocaat-generaal Cruz Villalón, overwegingen 154-158). |
| Bodó, B. Hacktivism 1-2-3: how privacy enhancing technologies change the face of anonymous hacktivism Internet Policy Review, 3 (4), 2015. @article{, title = {Hacktivism 1-2-3: how privacy enhancing technologies change the face of anonymous hacktivism}, author = {B. Bod\'{o}}, url = {http://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/hacktivism-1-2-3-how-privacy-enhancing-technologies-change-face-anonymous}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-24}, journal = {Internet Policy Review}, volume = {3}, number = {4}, abstract = { This short essay explores how the notion of hacktivism changes due to easily accessible, military grade Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PETs). Privacy Enhancing Technologies, technological tools which provide anonymous communications and protect users from online surveillance enable new forms of online political activism. Through the short summary of the ad-hoc vigilante group Anonymous, this article describes hacktivism 1.0 as electronic civil disobedience conducted by outsiders. Through the analysis of Wikileaks, the anonymous whistleblowing website, it describes how strong PETs enable the development of hacktivism 2.0, where the source of threat is shifted from outsiders to insiders. Insiders have access to documents with which power can be exposed, and who, by using PETs, can anonymously engage in political action. We also describe the emergence of a third generation of hacktivists who use PETs to disengage and create their own autonomous spaces rather than to engage with power through anonymous whistleblowing. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This short essay explores how the notion of hacktivism changes due to easily accessible, military grade Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PETs). Privacy Enhancing Technologies, technological tools which provide anonymous communications and protect users from online surveillance enable new forms of online political activism. Through the short summary of the ad-hoc vigilante group Anonymous, this article describes hacktivism 1.0 as electronic civil disobedience conducted by outsiders. Through the analysis of Wikileaks, the anonymous whistleblowing website, it describes how strong PETs enable the development of hacktivism 2.0, where the source of threat is shifted from outsiders to insiders. Insiders have access to documents with which power can be exposed, and who, by using PETs, can anonymously engage in political action. We also describe the emergence of a third generation of hacktivists who use PETs to disengage and create their own autonomous spaces rather than to engage with power through anonymous whistleblowing. |
| van der Sloot, B. Computer Law & Security Review, (1), pp. 26-45, 2015. @article{, title = {Do privacy and data protection rules apply to legal persons and should they? A proposal for a two-tiered system}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364914001812}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-24}, journal = {Computer Law & Security Review}, number = {1}, pages = {26-45}, abstract = { Privacy and data protection rules are usually said to protect the individual against intrusive governments and nosy companies. These rights guarantee the individual's freedom, personal autonomy and human dignity, among others. More and more, however, legal persons are also allowed to invoke the rights to privacy and data protection. Prima facie, it seems difficult to reconcile this trend with the standard interpretation of those rights, as legal persons do not enjoy freedom, personal autonomy or human dignity and it seems uncertain why business interests should be protected under privacy and data protection rules. On second thoughts, however, it appears rather unproblematic to grant legal persons partial protection under these regimes, especially when it recognizes general duties of care for data processors and governmental agencies. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Privacy and data protection rules are usually said to protect the individual against intrusive governments and nosy companies. These rights guarantee the individual's freedom, personal autonomy and human dignity, among others. More and more, however, legal persons are also allowed to invoke the rights to privacy and data protection. Prima facie, it seems difficult to reconcile this trend with the standard interpretation of those rights, as legal persons do not enjoy freedom, personal autonomy or human dignity and it seems uncertain why business interests should be protected under privacy and data protection rules. On second thoughts, however, it appears rather unproblematic to grant legal persons partial protection under these regimes, especially when it recognizes general duties of care for data processors and governmental agencies. |
| van der Sloot, B. De geheime dienst: An offer you can't refuse Ars Aequi, pp. 172-173., 2015. @article{, title = {De geheime dienst: An offer you can't refuse}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1547.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-24}, journal = {Ars Aequi}, pages = {172-173.}, abstract = { Geheime diensten beschermen de burger tegen een gevaar waarvan zij zich niet vaak niet eens bewust zijn. Dat zij zich daarbij nauwelijks aan banden laten leggen bleek wel toen geheimen van het hoofdkwartier van de NSA naar buiten werden gebracht. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Geheime diensten beschermen de burger tegen een gevaar waarvan zij zich niet vaak niet eens bewust zijn. Dat zij zich daarbij nauwelijks aan banden laten leggen bleek wel toen geheimen van het hoofdkwartier van de NSA naar buiten werden gebracht. |
| van Daalen, O. Burgers tegen Plasterk: het Nederlandse staartje van de Snowden-saga Ars Aequi, (4), pp. 287-293., 2015. @article{, title = {Burgers tegen Plasterk: het Nederlandse staartje van de Snowden-saga}, author = {O.L. van Daalen}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1535.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-17}, journal = {Ars Aequi}, number = {4}, pages = {287-293.}, abstract = { De Snowden-onthullingen haalden niet alleen wereldwijd de media en het parlementair debat. Ze leidden zelfs tot een Nederlandse rechtszaak over communicatieprivacy. Een principiële rechtszaak over burgerrechtenactivisme, surveillance en politieke intrige, met een verrassende, maar ook teleurstellende uitkomst. Dit moet je weten. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } De Snowden-onthullingen haalden niet alleen wereldwijd de media en het parlementair debat. Ze leidden zelfs tot een Nederlandse rechtszaak over communicatieprivacy. Een principiële rechtszaak over burgerrechtenactivisme, surveillance en politieke intrige, met een verrassende, maar ook teleurstellende uitkomst. Dit moet je weten. |
| Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. Privacybescherming online kan beter: De mythe van geïnformeerde toestemming Nederlands Juristenblad, (14), pp. 878-883., 2015. @article{, title = {Privacybescherming online kan beter: De mythe van ge\"{i}nformeerde toestemming}, author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1536.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-17}, journal = {Nederlands Juristenblad}, number = {14}, pages = {878-883.}, abstract = { De huidige privacyregels leggen veel nadruk op de geïnformeerde toestemming van internetgebruikers. Met zulke toestemmingsregels probeert de wet mensen in staat te stellen om keuzes te maken in hun eigen belang. Maar inzichten uit gedragsstudies trekken de effectiviteit van deze wetgevingstactiek in twijfel. Zo klikken internetgebruikers in de praktijk 'OK' op vrijwel elk toestemmingsverzoek dat op hun scherm verschijnt. De wet zou meer aandacht moeten geven aan de daadwerkelijke bescherming van de privacy van mensen die het internet opgaan. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } De huidige privacyregels leggen veel nadruk op de geïnformeerde toestemming van internetgebruikers. Met zulke toestemmingsregels probeert de wet mensen in staat te stellen om keuzes te maken in hun eigen belang. Maar inzichten uit gedragsstudies trekken de effectiviteit van deze wetgevingstactiek in twijfel. Zo klikken internetgebruikers in de praktijk 'OK' op vrijwel elk toestemmingsverzoek dat op hun scherm verschijnt. De wet zou meer aandacht moeten geven aan de daadwerkelijke bescherming van de privacy van mensen die het internet opgaan. |
| Poort, J. Auteurscontractenrecht: Paasei of lege dop? 2015. @article{, title = {Auteurscontractenrecht: Paasei of lege dop?}, author = {J.P. Poort}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1537.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-17}, note = { Gepubliceerd op IE-Forum.nl op 13 maart 2015, IEF 14755.2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| van Eijk, N. Dataretentie: Beter ten halve gekeerd dan ten hele gedwaald 2015. @misc{, title = {Dataretentie: Beter ten halve gekeerd dan ten hele gedwaald}, author = {N.A.N.M. van Eijk}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1538.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-17}, journal = {Mediaforum}, number = {3}, pages = {93.}, note = { Opinie. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Eskens, S., Granger, M.-P., Irion, K. Mediaforum, 27 (3), pp. 112-118, 2015. @article{, title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 8 april 2014 (Digital Rights Ireland / Ierse Ministers en Attorney General)}, author = {Irion, K. and Granger, M.-P. and Eskens, S.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1539.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-17}, journal = {Mediaforum}, volume = {27}, number = {3}, pages = {112-118}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Fahy, R. Political Advertising Bans and Freedom of Expression Greek Public Law Journal, pp. 226-228, 2015. @article{, title = {Political Advertising Bans and Freedom of Expression}, author = {R.F. Fahy}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1534.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-14}, journal = {Greek Public Law Journal}, pages = {226-228}, abstract = { In \emph{Animal Defenders International v UK}, the 17-judge Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the UK’s ban on political advertising on television, as applied to an animal rights organisation, did not violate freedom of expression. The Court divided nine votes to eight, with the majority opinion abandoning the Court’s previous ‘strict scrutiny’ review, and laying down a new doctrine for reviewing political advertising bans. This article, first, examines the role the composition of the Grand Chamber played in the outcome of the case. Second, questions the basis of the new doctrine of review. And third, criticises the majority’s treatment of precedent. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } In Animal Defenders International v UK, the 17-judge Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the UK’s ban on political advertising on television, as applied to an animal rights organisation, did not violate freedom of expression. The Court divided nine votes to eight, with the majority opinion abandoning the Court’s previous ‘strict scrutiny’ review, and laying down a new doctrine for reviewing political advertising bans. This article, first, examines the role the composition of the Grand Chamber played in the outcome of the case. Second, questions the basis of the new doctrine of review. And third, criticises the majority’s treatment of precedent. |
| van der Sloot, B. JIPITEC, (3), pp. 230-244., 2015. @article{, title = {Privacy as human flourishing: Could a shift towards virtue ethics strengthen privacy protection in the age of Big Data?}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1558.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-14}, journal = {JIPITEC}, number = {3}, pages = {230-244.}, abstract = { Privacy is commonly seen as an instrumental value in relation to negative freedom, human dignity and personal autonomy. Article 8 ECHR, protecting the right to privacy, was originally coined as a doctrine protecting the negative freedom of citizens in vertical relations, that is between citizen and state. Over the years, the Court has extended privacy protection to horizontal relations and has gradually accepted that individual autonomy is an equally important value underlying the right to privacy. However, in most of the recent cases regarding Article 8 ECHR, the Court goes beyond the protection of negative freedom and individual autonomy and instead focuses self-expression, personal development and human flourishing. Accepting this virtue ethical notion, in addition to the traditional Kantian focus on individual autonomy and human dignity, as a core value of Article 8 ECHR may prove vital for the protection of privacy in the age of Big Data. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Privacy is commonly seen as an instrumental value in relation to negative freedom, human dignity and personal autonomy. Article 8 ECHR, protecting the right to privacy, was originally coined as a doctrine protecting the negative freedom of citizens in vertical relations, that is between citizen and state. Over the years, the Court has extended privacy protection to horizontal relations and has gradually accepted that individual autonomy is an equally important value underlying the right to privacy. However, in most of the recent cases regarding Article 8 ECHR, the Court goes beyond the protection of negative freedom and individual autonomy and instead focuses self-expression, personal development and human flourishing. Accepting this virtue ethical notion, in addition to the traditional Kantian focus on individual autonomy and human dignity, as a core value of Article 8 ECHR may prove vital for the protection of privacy in the age of Big Data. |
| van der Sloot, B. Annotatie bij Rb. 's-Gravenhage 23 juli 2014 (Strafadvocaten e.a. / Staat der Nederlanden) 2015. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij Rb. 's-Gravenhage 23 juli 2014 (Strafadvocaten e.a. / Staat der Nederlanden)}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1559.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-13}, journal = {Mediaforum}, number = {11/12}, pages = {306-309.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| van der Sloot, B. Annotatie bij Rb. Amsterdam 18 september 2014 (Google) 2015. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij Rb. Amsterdam 18 september 2014 (Google)}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1560.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-10}, journal = {Jurisprudentie Bescherming Persoonsgegevens (JBP)}, abstract = { Verzoek verwijdering Google. Recht om vergeten te worden. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Verzoek verwijdering Google. Recht om vergeten te worden. |
| van der Sloot, B. Between fact and fiction: an analysis of the case law on article 12 ECHR Child and Familiy Law Quarterly, (4), pp. 397-420., 2015, ( Draft version. Final version published in <em>Child and Family Law Quarterly</em>, 2014-4, p. 397-420. ). @article{, title = {Between fact and fiction: an analysis of the case law on article 12 ECHR}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1561.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-08}, journal = {Child and Familiy Law Quarterly}, number = {4}, pages = {397-420.}, abstract = { The right to marry and found a family is currently the subject of worldwide debate. New Zealand and France recently opened up the right to marry to same-sex couples, which has led to mass protests, heated debates, and renewed violence against gay people in France. The Duma has passed a law prohibiting ‘homosexual propaganda’, and in the United States, the Supreme Court has delivered its revolutionary decision on the Defense of Marriage Act. This study enriches the existing debate by analysing the case law of the European Court of Human Rights regarding Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights, containing the right to marry and found a family. It will be shown that although the article was incorporated in the Convention as a typical negative right and anti-discrimination provision, until 2000 the Court has approached it from a Christian/conservative perspective, adopting very far-reaching restrictions on the rights of immigrants, denying transsexuals and same-sex couples the right to marry, denying a right to divorce, and denying the right to found a family through artificial insemination or adoption. It is only since 2000 that the Court has struck a somewhat more liberal tone, although many of the conservative doctrines still stand. }, note = { Draft version. Final version published in <em>Child and Family Law Quarterly</em>, 2014-4, p. 397-420. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } The right to marry and found a family is currently the subject of worldwide debate. New Zealand and France recently opened up the right to marry to same-sex couples, which has led to mass protests, heated debates, and renewed violence against gay people in France. The Duma has passed a law prohibiting ‘homosexual propaganda’, and in the United States, the Supreme Court has delivered its revolutionary decision on the Defense of Marriage Act. This study enriches the existing debate by analysing the case law of the European Court of Human Rights regarding Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights, containing the right to marry and found a family. It will be shown that although the article was incorporated in the Convention as a typical negative right and anti-discrimination provision, until 2000 the Court has approached it from a Christian/conservative perspective, adopting very far-reaching restrictions on the rights of immigrants, denying transsexuals and same-sex couples the right to marry, denying a right to divorce, and denying the right to found a family through artificial insemination or adoption. It is only since 2000 that the Court has struck a somewhat more liberal tone, although many of the conservative doctrines still stand. |
| Arnbak, A. Emotie domineert verstand na aanslagen in Parijs 2015. @misc{, title = {Emotie domineert verstand na aanslagen in Parijs}, author = {A.M. Arnbak}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1529.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-01}, note = { Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 28 januari 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Arnbak, A. Neem heft in eigen hand na hack Gemalto 2015. @misc{, title = {Neem heft in eigen hand na hack Gemalto}, author = {A.M. Arnbak}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1530.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-01}, note = { Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 25 februari 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Arnbak, A. Nederlandse polder als model voor regulering internet 2015. @misc{, title = {Nederlandse polder als model voor regulering internet}, author = {A.M. Arnbak}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1531.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-01}, note = { Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 25 maart 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| van Eechoud, M. De Wob krijgt een broertje: Wet hergebruik van overheidsinformatie Mediaforum, (2), pp. 49., 2015. @article{, title = {De Wob krijgt een broertje: Wet hergebruik van overheidsinformatie}, author = {M.M.M. van Eechoud}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1532.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-01}, journal = {Mediaforum}, number = {2}, pages = {49.}, note = { Opinie. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| van Daalen, O. Mediaforum, (2), pp. 50-54., 2015. @article{, title = {Tien privacytrends van 2014}, author = {O.L. van Daalen}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1533.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-04-01}, journal = {Mediaforum}, number = {2}, pages = {50-54.}, abstract = { Het privacyrecht is inmiddels een serieus specialisme met jaarlijks tientallen beschikkingen, vonnissen en richtsnoeren. Een overzicht daarvan is nuttig, maar kan je daarin ook bredere ontwikkelingen ontdekken? Het afgelopen jaar in tien privacytrends. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Het privacyrecht is inmiddels een serieus specialisme met jaarlijks tientallen beschikkingen, vonnissen en richtsnoeren. Een overzicht daarvan is nuttig, maar kan je daarin ook bredere ontwikkelingen ontdekken? Het afgelopen jaar in tien privacytrends. |
| Hugenholtz, P. Annotatie bij EHRM 10 januari 2013 (Ashby Donald c.s. / Frankrijk) 2015. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 10 januari 2013 (Ashby Donald c.s. / Frankrijk)}, author = {P.B. Hugenholtz}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1528.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-03-27}, journal = {NJ}, number = {14}, pages = {1367-1373.}, abstract = { Strafrechtelijke veroordeling wegens auteursrechtinbreuk door modefotografen. Geen sprake van debat van algemeen belang. Zeer ruime beoordelingsmarge bij afweging van door het EVRM en Eerste Protocol beschermde belangen, waartoe auteursrechten van modehuizen behoort. Geen inbreuk artikel 10 EVRM. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Strafrechtelijke veroordeling wegens auteursrechtinbreuk door modefotografen. Geen sprake van debat van algemeen belang. Zeer ruime beoordelingsmarge bij afweging van door het EVRM en Eerste Protocol beschermde belangen, waartoe auteursrechten van modehuizen behoort. Geen inbreuk artikel 10 EVRM. |
| Irion, K. Venture into the future of privacy ELSA Synergy Magazine, (57), pp. 28-31., 2015. @article{, title = {Venture into the future of privacy}, author = {K. Irion}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1526.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-03-26}, journal = {ELSA Synergy Magazine}, number = {57}, pages = {28-31.}, abstract = { At the time of writing I am at the Computer Privacy and Data Protection Conference, for insiders just CPDP 2015, one of several mega-events with more than 1,000 participants from governments, European Union (EU) institutions, corporations, civil society and privacy advocates, and plenty of lawyers and academics just like me. This is emblematic of the transformation privacy and data protection have undergone from a somewhat dull area of law to a very visible cutting-edge legal expertise. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } At the time of writing I am at the Computer Privacy and Data Protection Conference, for insiders just CPDP 2015, one of several mega-events with more than 1,000 participants from governments, European Union (EU) institutions, corporations, civil society and privacy advocates, and plenty of lawyers and academics just like me. This is emblematic of the transformation privacy and data protection have undergone from a somewhat dull area of law to a very visible cutting-edge legal expertise. |
| Hugenholtz, P. Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 14 juni 2013 (Cruijff / Tirion Uitgevers & De Jong) 2015. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 14 juni 2013 (Cruijff / Tirion Uitgevers & De Jong)}, author = {P.B. Hugenholtz}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1523.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-03-24}, journal = {NJ}, number = {13}, pages = {1273-1308.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Alberdingk Thijm, Chr. A. Kiezen uit twee hoogwaardige belangen 2015, ( In: <em>Bodem kort geding</em>, Rechtbank Amsterdam, 2013, p. 169-175.<br /> Bundel verschenen ter gelegenheid van het afscheid van de voorzitter van het Team Kort Gedingzaken van de rechtbank Amsterdam, mr. Sjoukje A. Rullmann op 11 oktober 2013. ). @misc{, title = {Kiezen uit twee hoogwaardige belangen}, author = {Alberdingk Thijm, Chr. A.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1524.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-03-24}, note = { In: <em>Bodem kort geding</em>, Rechtbank Amsterdam, 2013, p. 169-175.<br /> Bundel verschenen ter gelegenheid van het afscheid van de voorzitter van het Team Kort Gedingzaken van de rechtbank Amsterdam, mr. Sjoukje A. Rullmann op 11 oktober 2013. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Alberdingk Thijm, Chr. A. 2015. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie van de EU 10 april 2014 (ACI Adam c.s. / Stichting de Thuiskopie en SONT)}, author = {Alberdingk Thijm, Chr. A.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1525.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-03-24}, journal = {AMI}, number = {1}, pages = {12-17}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| van Eijk, N. KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi, (134), pp. 7735-7736, 2015. @article{, title = {Kroniek Telecommunicatierecht}, author = {N.A.N.M. van Eijk}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1513.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-03-13}, journal = {KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi}, number = {134}, pages = {7735-7736}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Breemen, J., Breemen, V. KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi, (134), pp. 7733-7735, 2015. @article{, title = {Kroniek Mediarecht}, author = {J.M. Breemen and V.E. Breemen}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1514.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-03-13}, journal = {KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi}, number = {134}, pages = {7733-7735}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Margoni, T. The digitisation of cultural heritage: originality, derivative works and (non) original photographs 2015. @techreport{, title = {The digitisation of cultural heritage: originality, derivative works and (non) original photographs}, author = {Margoni, T.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1507.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-03-03}, pages = {70 p.}, abstract = { The purpose of this paper is to explore the legal consequences of the digitisation of cultural heritage institutions' archives and in particular to establish whether digitisation processes involve the originality required to trigger new copyright or copyright-related protection. As the European Commission and many MS reported, copyright and in particular "photographers rights" are cause of legal uncertainty during digitisation processes. A major role in this legally uncertain field is played by the standard of originality which is one of the main requirements for copyright protection. Only when a subject matter achieves the requested level of originality, it can be considered a work of authorship. Therefore, a first key issue analysed in this study is whether \textendash and under which conditions \textendash digitisation activities can be considered to be original enough as to constitute works (usually a photographic work) in their own right. A second element of uncertainty is connected with the type of work eventually created by acts of digitisation. If the process of digitisation of a (protected) work can be considered authorial, then the resulting work will be a derivative composed by two works: the original work digitally reproduced and the \textendash probably \textendash photographic work reproducing it. Finally, a third element of uncertainty is found in the protection afforded to "other photographs" by the last sentence of Art. 6 Term Directive and implemented in a handful of European countries. Accordingly, the paper is structured as follows: Part I is dedicated to the analysis of copyright law key concepts such as the originality standard, the definition of derivative works and the forms of protection available in cases of digital (or film-based) representations of objects (photographs). The second part of the study is devoted to a survey of a selection of EU Member States in an attempt to verify how the general concepts identified in Part I are applied by national legislatures and courts. The selected countries are Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Poland, the Netherlands and the UK. The country analysis fulfils a double function: on the one hand it provides a specific overview of the national implementation of the solutions found at international and EU level. On the other hand, it constitutes the only possible approach in order to analyse the protection afforded by some MS to those "other photographs" (also called non original photographs or mere/simple photographs) provided for by the last sentence of Art. 6 Copyright Term Directive. Part III presents some conclusions and recommendations for cultural heritage institutions and for legislatures. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } The purpose of this paper is to explore the legal consequences of the digitisation of cultural heritage institutions' archives and in particular to establish whether digitisation processes involve the originality required to trigger new copyright or copyright-related protection.<br /> As the European Commission and many MS reported, copyright and in particular "photographers rights" are cause of legal uncertainty during digitisation processes. A major role in this legally uncertain field is played by the standard of originality which is one of the main requirements for copyright protection. Only when a subject matter achieves the requested level of originality, it can be considered a work of authorship. Therefore, a first key issue analysed in this study is whether – and under which conditions – digitisation activities can be considered to be original enough as to constitute works (usually a photographic work) in their own right. A second element of uncertainty is connected with the type of work eventually created by acts of digitisation. If the process of digitisation of a (protected) work can be considered authorial, then the resulting work will be a derivative composed by two works: the original work digitally reproduced and the – probably – photographic work reproducing it. Finally, a third element of uncertainty is found in the protection afforded to "other photographs" by the last sentence of Art. 6 Term Directive and implemented in a handful of European countries.<br /> Accordingly, the paper is structured as follows: Part I is dedicated to the analysis of copyright law key concepts such as the originality standard, the definition of derivative works and the forms of protection available in cases of digital (or film-based) representations of objects (photographs). The second part of the study is devoted to a survey of a selection of EU Member States in an attempt to verify how the general concepts identified in Part I are applied by national legislatures and courts. The selected countries are Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Poland, the Netherlands and the UK. The country analysis fulfils a double function: on the one hand it provides a specific overview of the national implementation of the solutions found at international and EU level. On the other hand, it constitutes the only possible approach in order to analyse the protection afforded by some MS to those "other photographs" (also called non original photographs or mere/simple photographs) provided for by the last sentence of Art. 6 Copyright Term Directive. Part III presents some conclusions and recommendations for cultural heritage institutions and for legislatures.<br /> |
| Hins, A. De rol van de media in integriteitskwesties: Het internationale perspectief 2015. @misc{, title = {De rol van de media in integriteitskwesties: Het internationale perspectief}, author = {A.W. Hins}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1506.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-02-27}, abstract = { Hoe kan het recht ertoe bijdragen dat de media misstanden op een goede manier aan het licht brengen? Transparantie is gebaat bij een vrije pers, maar ook andere belangen verdienen bescherming. Het gaat erom een evenwicht te vinden tussen de persvrijheid en het recht op privacy en de staatsveiligheid. De bijdrage wordt afgesloten met enkele aanbevelingen aan de Nederlandse wetgever. }, note = { In: S.C.Loeffen e.a. (red.) Integriteit in politiek en bestuur. De (on)mogelijkheden van het recht. Oisterwijk: Wolf Legal Publishers 2014, p. 209-221. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Hoe kan het recht ertoe bijdragen dat de media misstanden op een goede manier aan het licht brengen? Transparantie is gebaat bij een vrije pers, maar ook andere belangen verdienen bescherming. Het gaat erom een evenwicht te vinden tussen de persvrijheid en het recht op privacy en de staatsveiligheid. De bijdrage wordt afgesloten met enkele aanbevelingen aan de Nederlandse wetgever. |
| Poort, J. Empirical Evidence for Policy in Telecommunication, Copyright & Broadcasting Vossiuspers UvA / Amsterdam University Press, 2015, ISBN: 9789056297602. @book{, title = {Empirical Evidence for Policy in Telecommunication, Copyright & Broadcasting}, author = {J.P. Poort}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1504.pdf}, isbn = {9789056297602}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-02-26}, pages = {287 p.}, publisher = {Vossiuspers UvA / Amsterdam University Press}, abstract = { This dissertation contains nine articles with an empirical focus in copyright, telecommunication, and broadcasting. These articles address different research questions and employ a variety of methodological approaches. They all share an economic foundation and the aim to contribute to evidence based policymaking in the field of information law. Topics covered range from the welfare effects of illegal downloading, to those of public television; from the effectiveness of blocking access to The Pirate Bay to stop consumers from illegal downloading, to the effect of adequate legal online services on illegal downloading; from fixed price regulation for e-books, to text and video relay services to enable the hearing impaired to use telephony services; from the valuation of commercial radio licenses, to setting renewal fees for telecommunication spectrum based on an auction. Using these nine articles as case studies, the role and impact of economic evidence for policymaking in the field of information law is investigated. It is concluded that this role is positive rather than normative: legal or social norms maintain the upper hand as guiding principles for policy, more than the economic goal of welfare maximization. However, this does not by any means render economic analysis useless. Increasingly, politicians, judges and stakeholders require economic analysis and economic evidence to make informed decisions about new policy measures, to make optimal decisions within existing legal boundaries and to fathom the consequences of proposed legal interventions. Without empirical evidence they may simply assume the effects of a policy measure as an article of faith. }, note = { Vossiuspers UvA - Amsterdam University Press 2015, 287 p. ISBN 9789056297602. See here the table of contents, abstract and summary in Dutch of the dissertation. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {book} } This dissertation contains nine articles with an empirical focus in copyright, telecommunication, and broadcasting. These articles address different research questions and employ a variety of methodological approaches. They all share an economic foundation and the aim to contribute to evidence based policymaking in the field of information law. Topics covered range from the welfare effects of illegal downloading, to those of public television; from the effectiveness of blocking access to The Pirate Bay to stop consumers from illegal downloading, to the effect of adequate legal online services on illegal downloading; from fixed price regulation for e-books, to text and video relay services to enable the hearing impaired to use telephony services; from the valuation of commercial radio licenses, to setting renewal fees for telecommunication spectrum based on an auction. Using these nine articles as case studies, the role and impact of economic evidence for policymaking in the field of information law is investigated. It is concluded that this role is positive rather than normative: legal or social norms maintain the upper hand as guiding principles for policy, more than the economic goal of welfare maximization. However, this does not by any means render economic analysis useless. Increasingly, politicians, judges and stakeholders require economic analysis and economic evidence to make informed decisions about new policy measures, to make optimal decisions within existing legal boundaries and to fathom the consequences of proposed legal interventions. Without empirical evidence they may simply assume the effects of a policy measure as an article of faith. |
| Hugenholtz, P. De zaak Tuymans: een deontologische kwestie 24.02.2015. @misc{, title = {De zaak Tuymans: een deontologische kwestie}, author = {P.B. Hugenholtz}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1503.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-02-24}, note = { Korte voordracht gehouden tijdens debatavond over plagiaat in de kunsten, Akademie van Kunsten, Amsterdam, 19 februari 2015. Zie ook het journalistieke verslag en de videoregistratie van deze avond. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {presentation} } |
| Hins, A., Nieuwenhuis, A. 3e dr., Ars Aequi Libri, 2015, ISBN: 9789069166155. @book{, title = {Hoofdstukken Grondrechten}, author = {A.W. Hins and A.J. Nieuwenhuis}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1494.pdf}, isbn = {9789069166155}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-02-20}, publisher = {Ars Aequi Libri}, edition = {3e dr.}, note = { 3e herziene druk, Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri 2014, ISBN: 9789069166155. Studieboek voor studenten rechtsgeleerdheid. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {book} } |
| Hins, A. Annotatie bij EHRM 1 juli 2014 (A.B. / Zwitserland) 2015. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 1 juli 2014 (A.B. / Zwitserland)}, author = {Hins, A.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1495.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-02-20}, journal = {European Human Rights Cases}, number = {9}, abstract = { In Zwitserland was een journalist strafrechtelijk veroordeeld wegens het publiceren van gegevens uit een strafdossier. De kleinst mogelijke meerderheid van het EHRM acht diens klacht op grond van artikel 10 EVRM gegrond. Botsing van de persvrijheid met het recht op een eerlijk proces en met het recht op privacy van de verdachte. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } In Zwitserland was een journalist strafrechtelijk veroordeeld wegens het publiceren van gegevens uit een strafdossier. De kleinst mogelijke meerderheid van het EHRM acht diens klacht op grond van artikel 10 EVRM gegrond. Botsing van de persvrijheid met het recht op een eerlijk proces en met het recht op privacy van de verdachte. |
| Hins, A. Het 'Wetsvoorstel open overheid' in het licht van artikel 10 EVRM Mediaforum, (4), pp. 110-113, 2015. @article{, title = {Het 'Wetsvoorstel open overheid' in het licht van artikel 10 EVRM}, author = {A.W. Hins}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1496.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-02-20}, journal = {Mediaforum}, number = {4}, pages = {110-113}, abstract = { Het initiatiefwetsvoorstel open overheid verdient veel waardering. De mogelijkheid om af te wijken van de absolute weigeringsgronden zou echter niet beperkt moeten blijven tot gevallen waarin de overheid uit eigen beweging tot openbaarmaking besluit. Wanneer een journalist informatie opvraagt met een beroep op artikel 10 EVRM, is de overheid ook nu al verplicht te onderzoeken of een absolute weigeringsgrond buiten toepassing moet worden gelaten. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Het initiatiefwetsvoorstel open overheid verdient veel waardering. De mogelijkheid om af te wijken van de absolute weigeringsgronden zou echter niet beperkt moeten blijven tot gevallen waarin de overheid uit eigen beweging tot openbaarmaking besluit. Wanneer een journalist informatie opvraagt met een beroep op artikel 10 EVRM, is de overheid ook nu al verplicht te onderzoeken of een absolute weigeringsgrond buiten toepassing moet worden gelaten. |
| Hins, A. The freedom to conduct a business and the right to receive information for free 2015. @misc{, title = {The freedom to conduct a business and the right to receive information for free}, author = {A.W. Hins}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1497.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-02-20}, journal = {Common Market Law Review}, number = {2}, pages = {665-678.}, abstract = { Annotation to ECJ 22 January 2013, C-283/11, Sky Österreich GmbH v. Österreichischer Rundfunk. The judgment of the ECJ concerns the validity of Article 15 (6) of the Audiovisual Media Directive on the right to broadcast short fragments of sporting events on television, without having to pay a compensation to the rights holder. The Court held that the provision does not violate the right to property and the right to conduct a business, guaranteed by the Charter of Fundamental Rights. The judgment shows a remarkable difference with the case law of the constitutional courts of Austria and Germany. }, note = { Common Market Law Review is voor mensen met een UvAnetID toegankelijk via Kluwer Law International. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Annotation to ECJ 22 January 2013, C-283/11, Sky Österreich GmbH v. Österreichischer Rundfunk. The judgment of the ECJ concerns the validity of Article 15 (6) of the Audiovisual Media Directive on the right to broadcast short fragments of sporting events on television, without having to pay a compensation to the rights holder. The Court held that the provision does not violate the right to property and the right to conduct a business, guaranteed by the Charter of Fundamental Rights. The judgment shows a remarkable difference with the case law of the constitutional courts of Austria and Germany. |
| Hins, A. Annotatie bij Vzr. Rb. Midden-Nederland 11 september 2014 (RTL / Minister van Financiën) 2015. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij Vzr. Rb. Midden-Nederland 11 september 2014 (RTL / Minister van Financi\"{e}n)}, author = {A.W. Hins}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1501.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-02-20}, journal = {Mediaforum}, number = {1}, pages = {46-48.}, abstract = { Wob-procedure van RTL om de concept-Miljoenennota openbaar te krijgen. De noot gaat in op de parlementaire debatten over het tijdstip van openbaarmaking van de Prinsjesdagstukken en over de betekenis van artikel 26 van de Wet op de Raad van State. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Wob-procedure van RTL om de concept-Miljoenennota openbaar te krijgen. De noot gaat in op de parlementaire debatten over het tijdstip van openbaarmaking van de Prinsjesdagstukken en over de betekenis van artikel 26 van de Wet op de Raad van State. |
| Hins, A. KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi, (130), pp. 7441-7442., 2015. @article{, title = {Kroniek Mediarecht}, author = {A.W. Hins}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1491.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-02-17}, journal = {KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi}, number = {130}, pages = {7441-7442.}, note = { Kroniek over het vierde kwartaal 2013. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Hins, A. KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi, (131), pp. 7515-7517., 2015. @article{, title = {Kroniek Mediarecht}, author = {A.W. Hins}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1492.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-02-17}, journal = {KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi}, number = {131}, pages = {7515-7517.}, note = { Kroniek over het eerste kwartaal 2014. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Hins, A. KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi, (132), pp. 7592-7593., 2015. @article{, title = {Kroniek Mediarecht}, author = {A.W. Hins}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1493.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-02-17}, journal = {KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi}, number = {132}, pages = {7592-7593.}, note = { Kroniek over het tweede kwartaal 2014. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Dommering, E., van Eijk, N. 03.02.2015. @misc{, title = {Bijdrage aan Rondetafelgesprek inzake dataretentie 29 januari 2015, Vaste commissie voor Veiligheid en Justitie}, author = {N.A.N.M. van Eijk and E.J. Dommering}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1490.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-02-03}, note = { Zie ook 'Vertekend beeld door afschaflobby bewaarplicht' in Netkwesties, 29 januari 2015, met commentaar van Egbert Dommering 'Niet verzamelen is uitgangspunt'. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {presentation} } |
| Laing, D., Schroff, S., Street, J. Collective Management Organisations, Creativity and Cultural Diversity CREATe Working Paper Series, 2015/02 , pp. 1-31, 2015. @article{Street2015, title = {Collective Management Organisations, Creativity and Cultural Diversity}, author = {Street, J. and Laing, D. and Schroff, S.}, url = {http://www.create.ac.uk/publications/collective-management-organisations-creativity-and-cultural-diversity/}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-02-02}, journal = {CREATe Working Paper Series}, volume = {2015/02}, pages = {1-31}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Dommering, E. Videokunst bekijkt u straks thuis op tv 2015. @periodical{, title = {Videokunst bekijkt u straks thuis op tv}, author = {E.J. Dommering}, url = {http://fd.nl/fd-outlook/1089620/videokunst-bekijkt-u-straks-thuis-op-tv}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-01-27}, journal = {Het Financieele Dagblad}, pages = {14.}, note = { 24 januari 2015. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {periodical} } |
| Irion, K. The Court of Justice and the Data Retention Directive in Digital Rights Ireland European Law Review, (6), pp. 835-850., 2015. @article{, title = {The Court of Justice and the Data Retention Directive in Digital Rights Ireland}, author = {K. Irion}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1456.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-01-15}, journal = {European Law Review}, number = {6}, pages = {835-850.}, abstract = { In Digital Rights Ireland, the Court of Justice invalidated the 2006 Data Retention Directive, which required private providers to retain for a considerable period electronic communication metadata for law enforcement purposes. In this landmark ruling, the EU judiciary introduced a strict scrutiny test for EU legislative acts that interfere seriously with important rights protected by the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights—in this case, the rights to privacy and data protection—and applied a rigorous assessment of the proportionality of the measure under the Charter, criticising numerous aspects of the Directive. This article presents and analyses the judgment, discussing its implications for constitutional review and constitutionalism in the European Union, and the substantive and procedural constraints that it imposes on EU and national data retention schemes. It concludes by reflecting on the ruling’s impact on European integration and data related policies. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } In Digital Rights Ireland, the Court of Justice invalidated the 2006 Data Retention Directive, which required private providers to retain for a considerable period electronic communication metadata for law enforcement purposes. In this landmark ruling, the EU judiciary introduced a strict scrutiny test for EU legislative acts that interfere seriously with important rights protected by the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights—in this case, the rights to privacy and data protection—and applied a rigorous assessment of the proportionality of the measure under the Charter, criticising numerous aspects of the Directive. This article presents and analyses the judgment, discussing its implications for constitutional review and constitutionalism in the European Union, and the substantive and procedural constraints that it imposes on EU and national data retention schemes. It concludes by reflecting on the ruling’s impact on European integration and data related policies. |
| Keller, P., Margoni, T., Rybicka, K., Tarkowski, A. Re-use of public sector information in cultural heritage institutions International Free and Open Source Software Law Review, 6 (1), pp. 1-9., 2015. @article{, title = {Re-use of public sector information in cultural heritage institutions}, author = {Keller, P. and Rybicka, K. and Tarkowski, A. and Margoni, T.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1484.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-01-13}, journal = {International Free and Open Source Software Law Review}, volume = {6}, number = {1}, pages = {1-9.}, abstract = { In 2013 the European Union amended the Directive on Public Sector Information, establishing the principle that all available information produced and collected by public sector institutions must be made available for reuse under open terms and conditions. The amended Directive also brings publicly funded libraries, museums and archives into its scope. These new rules on reuse of heritage materials, treated as public sector information (PSI), attempt for the first time to define a general framework for sharing cultural heritage information all around Europe. In this paper we argue that if Member States are not careful, the implementation of the changes required by the new Directive could do more harm than good when it comes to access to digitized cultural heritage in Europe. These concerns center on how the directive interacts with copyright legislation. The paper recommends that in order to contribute to the opening up of cultural heritage resources, Member States should ensure that all qualifying documents that are not currently covered by third party intellectual property rights fall within the scope of the Directive. Member States should also implement the Directive in a way that does not encourage or require institutions to charge for the reuse of works that they make available for reuse. For documents that are still protected by intellectual property rights but where these rights are held by the cultural heritage institutions that have these works in their collections, Member States should encourage the use of Open Definition-compliant licenses. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } In 2013 the European Union amended the Directive on Public Sector Information, establishing the principle that all available information produced and collected by public sector institutions must be made available for reuse under open terms and conditions. The amended Directive also brings publicly funded libraries, museums and archives into its scope. These new rules on reuse of heritage materials, treated as public sector information (PSI), attempt for the first time to define a general framework for sharing cultural heritage information all around Europe. In this paper we argue that if Member States are not careful, the implementation of the changes required by the new Directive could do more harm than good when it comes to access to digitized cultural heritage in Europe. These concerns center on how the directive interacts with copyright legislation. The paper recommends that in order to contribute to the opening up of cultural heritage resources, Member States should ensure that all qualifying documents that are not currently covered by third party intellectual property rights fall within the scope of the Directive. Member States should also implement the Directive in a way that does not encourage or require institutions to charge for the reuse of works that they make available for reuse. For documents that are still protected by intellectual property rights but where these rights are held by the cultural heritage institutions that have these works in their collections, Member States should encourage the use of Open Definition-compliant licenses. |
| Helberger, N. 2015. @periodical{, title = {Nieuws \`{a} la carte}, author = {N. Helberger}, url = {https://blendle.com/item/bnl-par-20150102-3827716/welcome}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-01-13}, note = { Interview in Het Parool van 2 januari 2015 over veranderende positie van de social media gebruiker. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {periodical} } |
| Vallbé, J. Springer, 2015, ISBN: 9789401794268. @book{, title = {Frameworks for Modeling Cognition and Decisions in Institutional Environments: A Data-Driven Approach}, author = {Vallb\'{e}, J.}, url = {http://www.springer.com/law/international/book/978-94-017-9426-8}, isbn = {9789401794268}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-01-13}, pages = {232 }, publisher = {Springer}, series = {Law, Governance and Technology Series}, abstract = { This book deals with the theoretical, methodological, and empirical implications of bounded rationality in the operation of institutions. It focuses on decisions made under uncertainty, and presents a reliable strategy of knowledge acquisition for the design and implementation of decision-support systems. Based on the distinction between the inner and outer environment of decisions, the book explores both the cognitive mechanisms at work when actors decide, and the institutional mechanisms existing among and within organizations that make decisions fairly predictable. While a great deal of work has been done on how organizations act as patterns of events for (boundedly) rational decisions, less effort has been devoted to study under which circumstances organizations cease to act as such reliable mechanisms. Through an empirical strategy on open-ended response data from a survey among junior judges, the work pursues two main goals. The first one is to explore the limits of “institutional rationality” of the Spanish lower courts on-call service, an optimal scenario to observe decision-making under uncertainty. The second aim is to achieve a better understanding of the kind of uncertainty under which inexperienced decision-makers work. This entails exploring the demands imposed by problems and the knowledge needed to deal with them, making this book also a study on expertise achievement in institutional environments. This book combines standard multivariate statistical methods with machine learning techniques such as multidimensional scaling and topic models, treating text as data. Doing so, the book contributes to the collaboration between empirical social scientific approaches and the community of scientists that provide the set of tools and methods to make sense of the fastest growing resource of our time: data. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {book} } This book deals with the theoretical, methodological, and empirical implications of bounded rationality in the operation of institutions. It focuses on decisions made under uncertainty, and presents a reliable strategy of knowledge acquisition for the design and implementation of decision-support systems. Based on the distinction between the inner and outer environment of decisions, the book explores both the cognitive mechanisms at work when actors decide, and the institutional mechanisms existing among and within organizations that make decisions fairly predictable.<br /> While a great deal of work has been done on how organizations act as patterns of events for (boundedly) rational decisions, less effort has been devoted to study under which circumstances organizations cease to act as such reliable mechanisms. Through an empirical strategy on open-ended response data from a survey among junior judges, the work pursues two main goals. The first one is to explore the limits of “institutional rationality” of the Spanish lower courts on-call service, an optimal scenario to observe decision-making under uncertainty. The second aim is to achieve a better understanding of the kind of uncertainty under which inexperienced decision-makers work. This entails exploring the demands imposed by problems and the knowledge needed to deal with them, making this book also a study on expertise achievement in institutional environments.<br /> This book combines standard multivariate statistical methods with machine learning techniques such as multidimensional scaling and topic models, treating text as data. Doing so, the book contributes to the collaboration between empirical social scientific approaches and the community of scientists that provide the set of tools and methods to make sense of the fastest growing resource of our time: data. |
| Henderson, J., Yakovleva, S., Yefremova, M. Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2015, ISBN: 9781849462990. @book{, title = {Contract Law in Russia}, author = {M. Yefremova and J. Henderson and S.V. Yakovleva}, url = {http://www.hartpub.co.uk/BookDetails.aspx?ISBN=9781849462990}, isbn = {9781849462990}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-01-09}, pages = {326 pp.}, publisher = {Hart Publishing}, address = {Oxford}, abstract = { The book explains Russian contract law in a form understandable to lawyers qualified in other countries, especially common law countries. The introduction gives a concise overview of the Russian legal system in general and contract law in particular as well as a brief insight into the history of contract law in Russia. Then the main concepts of Russian contract law are explained, using the conceptual framework of English contract law to make them accessible to someone not familiar with the codified Russian system.The book not only considers the legislation regulating Russian contractual relations but also includes appropriate case law to show how the legislation is interpreted. The focus is on contract law in Russia as it actually operates, rather than merely the legislative texts, so that it will be directly relevant to legal practitioners and others who wish to acquire knowledge of the practical application of an important element of the Russian legal system, as well as those seeking an insight into the realities of codified law in action. The target readership therefore includes legal practitioners who have to deal with Russian law, academics and students with an interest in Russian law, the law of contract and comparative civil law, as well as scholars of comparative legal systems and Russian area studies. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {book} } The book explains Russian contract law in a form understandable to lawyers qualified in other countries, especially common law countries. The introduction gives a concise overview of the Russian legal system in general and contract law in particular as well as a brief insight into the history of contract law in Russia. Then the main concepts of Russian contract law are explained, using the conceptual framework of English contract law to make them accessible to someone not familiar with the codified Russian system.The book not only considers the legislation regulating Russian contractual relations but also includes appropriate case law to show how the legislation is interpreted. The focus is on contract law in Russia as it actually operates, rather than merely the legislative texts, so that it will be directly relevant to legal practitioners and others who wish to acquire knowledge of the practical application of an important element of the Russian legal system, as well as those seeking an insight into the realities of codified law in action. The target readership therefore includes legal practitioners who have to deal with Russian law, academics and students with an interest in Russian law, the law of contract and comparative civil law, as well as scholars of comparative legal systems and Russian area studies. |
| Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. Kinderen worden gevolgd op websites en in apps 2015. @misc{, title = {Kinderen worden gevolgd op websites en in apps}, author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius}, url = {http://kassa.vara.nl/tv/afspeelpagina/fragment/kinderen-worden-gevolgd-op-websites-en-in-apps/speel/1/}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-01-08}, note = { Frederik Borgesius te gast bij het programma Kassa over websites en apps voor kinderen. Zie ook het artikel in De Correspondent van Dimitri Tokmetzis, Dit zijn de virtuele stalkers van uw kind, waar o.a. Ot van Daalen aan het woord komt. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Arnbak, A. Wat eeuwen van spam ons leren over cybersecurity 2015. @misc{, title = {Wat eeuwen van spam ons leren over cybersecurity}, author = {A.M. Arnbak}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1480.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-01-08}, note = { Column in Het Financieele Dagblad van 31 december 2014. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. New Forms of Commercial Communications and Data Protection Law 2015. @misc{, title = {New Forms of Commercial Communications and Data Protection Law}, author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1481.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-01-08}, note = { In: New Forms of Commercial Communications in a Converged Audiovisual Sector, IRIS Special, p. 67-76. Ook beschikbaar in het Duits en Frans. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Dommering, E. Het internet: een wereldwijde vrije ruimte met begrensde staatsmacht 2015. @techreport{, title = {Het internet: een wereldwijde vrije ruimte met begrensde staatsmacht}, author = {E.J. Dommering}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1472.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-01-06}, abstract = { Op 20 februari 2014 vroeg het kabinet de Adviesraad Internationale Vraagstukken (AIV) te adviseren over internetvrijheid. Volgens de adviesaanvraag zijn het recht op privacy, het recht op bescherming van data, het recht op vertrouwelijke communicatie en de vrijheid van meningsuiting voorbeelden van internetvrijheid. Het basisbeginsel is dat rechten die \emph{offline} gelden, ook \emph{online} gelden. Het ontstaan en de snelle groei van het internet hebben geleid tot nieuwe vormen van communicatie, die op hun beurt hebben geleid tot nieuwe vragen hoe deze rechten gewaarborgd kunnen worden, mede omdat deze rechten soms moeten worden afgewogen tegen veiligheidsbelangen. Het kabinet legt aan de AIV de vraag voor hoe internetvrijheid verder bevorderd kan worden in nationaal en internationaal beleid, hoe ver de Nederlandse jurisdictie strekt en wat de rol van het bedrijfsleven is bij het bevorderen van internetvrijheid. De AIV heeft een gecombineerde commissie ingesteld om dit advies voor te bereiden onder voorzitterschap van prof.mr. E.J. Dommering (Commissie Mensenrechten, CMR). De leden van de commissie waren mw.mr. dr. B.T. van Ginkel (Commissie Vrede en Veiligheid, CVV), mw. prof.dr. M. de Goede (CVV), prof.dr. E.J. Koops (CMR), mw. dr. P.C. Plooij-van Gorsel (AIV / Commissie Europese Integratie) en mw. mr. H.M. Verrijn Stuart (AIV / CMR). }, note = { Adviesraad Internationale Vraagstukken (IAV), Den Haag: AIV 2014. See also the English version of the advisory report: The Internet: A Global Free Space with Limited State Control, No. 92, Advisory Council on International Affairs, November 2014. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } Op 20 februari 2014 vroeg het kabinet de Adviesraad Internationale Vraagstukken (AIV) te adviseren over internetvrijheid. Volgens de adviesaanvraag zijn het recht op privacy, het recht op bescherming van data, het recht op vertrouwelijke communicatie en de vrijheid van meningsuiting voorbeelden van internetvrijheid. Het basisbeginsel is dat rechten die offline gelden, ook online gelden. Het ontstaan en de snelle groei van het internet hebben geleid tot nieuwe vormen van communicatie, die op hun beurt hebben geleid tot nieuwe vragen hoe deze rechten gewaarborgd kunnen worden, mede omdat deze rechten soms moeten worden afgewogen tegen veiligheidsbelangen. Het kabinet legt aan de AIV de vraag voor hoe internetvrijheid verder bevorderd kan worden in nationaal en internationaal beleid, hoe ver de Nederlandse jurisdictie strekt en wat de rol van het bedrijfsleven is bij het bevorderen van internetvrijheid. De AIV heeft een gecombineerde commissie ingesteld om dit advies voor te bereiden onder voorzitterschap van prof.mr. E.J. Dommering (Commissie Mensenrechten, CMR). De leden van de commissie waren mw.mr. dr. B.T. van Ginkel (Commissie Vrede en Veiligheid, CVV), mw. prof.dr. M. de Goede (CVV), prof.dr. E.J. Koops (CMR), mw. dr. P.C. Plooij-van Gorsel (AIV / Commissie Europese Integratie) en mw. mr. H.M. Verrijn Stuart (AIV / CMR). |
| Kabel, J. Annotatie bij Rb. Amsterdam, 27 augustus 2014 (LIRA / UPC) 2015. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij Rb. Amsterdam, 27 augustus 2014 (LIRA / UPC)}, author = {J.J.C. Kabel}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1473.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-01-06}, journal = {AMI}, number = {6}, pages = {208.}, abstract = { Geschil tussen collectieve beheersorganisatie Stichting Lira (Lira) en kabelbedrijven UPC, Zeelandnet en Ziggo (UPC c.s.). Lira vordert een verbod van openbaarmaking door UPC c.s. van aan Lira door de tekstschrijvers overgedragen werk. De rechtbank oordeelt dat die overdracht geldig is en dat voor zover daarbij rechten m.b.t. toekomstige werken worden overgedragen deze voldoende bepaald zijn om te kunnen worden overgedragen. Artikel 45d Auteurswet staat daaraan niet in de weg. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Geschil tussen collectieve beheersorganisatie Stichting Lira (Lira) en kabelbedrijven UPC, Zeelandnet en Ziggo (UPC c.s.). Lira vordert een verbod van openbaarmaking door UPC c.s. van aan Lira door de tekstschrijvers overgedragen werk. De rechtbank oordeelt dat die overdracht geldig is en dat voor zover daarbij rechten m.b.t. toekomstige werken worden overgedragen deze voldoende bepaald zijn om te kunnen worden overgedragen. Artikel 45d Auteurswet staat daaraan niet in de weg. |
| van Daalen, O. Bescherm je cliënten tegen de staat, versleutel je mail 2015. @periodical{, title = {Bescherm je cli\"{e}nten tegen de staat, versleutel je mail}, author = {O.L. van Daalen}, url = {http://www.nrc.nl/handelsblad/van/2014/december/22/bescherm-je-clienten-tegen-de-staat-versleutel-je-1450964}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-01-06}, abstract = { De AIVD houdt zich niet aan aftapbevoegdheden. Een gezonde dosis paranoia zou advocaten daarom niet misstaan, meent Ot van Daalen. }, note = { Opinie in NRC Handelsblad op 22 december 2014. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {periodical} } De AIVD houdt zich niet aan aftapbevoegdheden. Een gezonde dosis paranoia zou advocaten daarom niet misstaan, meent Ot van Daalen. |
| Korthals Altes, W. 2015. @misc{, title = {Charlie Hebdo}, author = {W.F. Korthals Altes}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1521.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-01-03}, journal = {Mediaforum}, number = {1}, pages = {1.}, note = { Opinie. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Korthals Altes, W. De Monroe Price Moot Court Competition: een pleidooi Mediaforum, (1), pp. 20-21., 2015. @article{, title = {De Monroe Price Moot Court Competition: een pleidooi}, author = {W.F. Korthals Altes}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1522.pdf}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-01-02}, journal = {Mediaforum}, number = {1}, pages = {20-21.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Hins, A. AD versus Demmink: Don't shoot the messenger 2014. @misc{, title = {AD versus Demmink: Don't shoot the messenger}, author = {A.W. Hins}, url = {http://jnmblog.nl/articles/ad-versus-demmink-dont-shoot-the-messenger}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-12-23}, note = { Bijdrage aan webblog Journalistiek en Nieuwe Media van de Universiteit Leiden. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
Romantic authorship in copyright law and the uses of aesthetics 2014. @misc{, title = {Romantic authorship in copyright law and the uses of aesthetics}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1463.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-12-19}, abstract = { Scholars of the arts as well as scholars of copyright law – especially in the US – have for decades struggled to kill off the ideology of Romantic authorship, though it is far from clear precisely what it consists of, or why and to whom it poses such danger. The situation brings to mind film historian Tom Gunning’s memorable observation in a different context that the persistent attacks ‘begin to take on something of the obsessive and possibly necrophilic pleasure of beating a dead horse’ (1998, p. xiii). This chapter is divided into two main parts. The first part critically examines the idea that the myth of Romantic authorship is deeply ingrained in copyright law and has propelled its expansion. The second part explores the broader but related issue of how insights from the humanities can usefully inform copyright scholarship. Taking as its starting point Roland Barthes’ famous essay ‘The Death of the Author’ it argues that it is extremely demanding to find common ground, for even though the disciplines overlap conceptually they are fundamentally at cross-purposes epistemologically. I maintain that we must first identify where the aims and practices of aesthetics and law actually converge, and deem it to be in the area of interpretation and evaluation, which is obviously one of the core competences of scholars of the arts, and also something that courts resort to at the infringement stage. }, note = { In: The Work of Authorship, M.M.M. van Eechoud (ed.), Amsterdam: AUP 2014, p. 45-93. ISBN 9789089646354. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Scholars of the arts as well as scholars of copyright law – especially in the US – have for decades struggled to kill off the ideology of Romantic authorship, though it is far from clear precisely what it consists of, or why and to whom it poses such danger. The situation brings to mind film historian Tom Gunning’s memorable observation in a different context that the persistent attacks ‘begin to take on something of the obsessive and possibly necrophilic pleasure of beating a dead horse’ (1998, p. xiii). This chapter is divided into two main parts. The first part critically examines the idea that the myth of Romantic authorship is deeply ingrained in copyright law and has propelled its expansion. The second part explores the broader but related issue of how insights from the humanities can usefully inform copyright scholarship. Taking as its starting point Roland Barthes’ famous essay ‘The Death of the Author’ it argues that it is extremely demanding to find common ground, for even though the disciplines overlap conceptually they are fundamentally at cross-purposes epistemologically. I maintain that we must first identify where the aims and practices of aesthetics and law actually converge, and deem it to be in the area of interpretation and evaluation, which is obviously one of the core competences of scholars of the arts, and also something that courts resort to at the infringement stage. |
Creative work and communicative norms: Perspectives from legal philosophy 2014. @misc{, title = {Creative work and communicative norms: Perspectives from legal philosophy}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1469.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-12-19}, abstract = { In consideration of the application of insights from the humanities to the interpretation of core legal concepts in copyright, this chapter examines three questions: first, what is a ‘work of authorship’, and why does copyright law place such a strong emphasis on originality for determining what counts as a work? Second, can and should we modify ‘romantic’ conceptions of authorship, to take into account the various ways in which authorial practices seem to conflict with their highly individualistic and creator-centred focus? Finally, how might copyright law make sense of the various ways in which authorship is collaborative, in light of its somewhat restrictive definitions of co-authorship? This chapter will consider the contribution that existing philosophical literature on the justification of copyright might have to these questions. It begins by outlining three categories that have application to questions about authorship – labour, personality and communication – and explaining a deeper distinction between proprietary and non-proprietary accounts of authorship which underlies these categories. It goes on to illustrate how these differing approaches to authorship can be applied to the three questions under consideration. For reasons of space and practicality, the focus of this chapter will reflect my expertise in Anglo-American copyright theory and doctrine. }, note = { In: The Work of Authorship, M.M.M. van Eechoud (ed.), Amsterdam: AUP 2014, p. 19-44. ISBN 9789089646354. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } In consideration of the application of insights from the humanities to the interpretation of core legal concepts in copyright, this chapter examines three questions: first, what is a ‘work of authorship’, and why does copyright law place such a strong emphasis on originality for determining what counts as a work? Second, can and should we modify ‘romantic’ conceptions of authorship, to take into account the various ways in which authorial practices seem to conflict with their highly individualistic and creator-centred focus? Finally, how might copyright law make sense of the various ways in which authorship is collaborative, in light of its somewhat restrictive definitions of co-authorship? This chapter will consider the contribution that existing philosophical literature on the justification of copyright might have to these questions. It begins by outlining three categories that have application to questions about authorship – labour, personality and communication – and explaining a deeper distinction between proprietary and non-proprietary accounts of authorship which underlies these categories. It goes on to illustrate how these differing approaches to authorship can be applied to the three questions under consideration. For reasons of space and practicality, the focus of this chapter will reflect my expertise in Anglo-American copyright theory and doctrine. |
| Guibault, L., Hugenholtz, P., van Gompel, S. Extended collective licensing: panacee voor massadigitalisering? 2014. @article{, title = {Extended collective licensing: panacee voor massadigitalisering?}, author = {P.B. Hugenholtz and S.J. van Gompel and L. Guibault}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1471.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-12-19}, abstract = { In dit rechtsvergelijkend onderzoek wordt geanalyseerd welke voor- en nadelen de invoering van een wettelijk stelsel van \emph{extended collective licensing} (‘verruimde’ collectieve licentieovereenkomsten) kan hebben om de \emph{rights clearance} van digitaliseringsprojecten van erfgoedinstellingen te vergemakkelijken. Daarbij wordt een vergelijking gemaakt met de situatie waarin collectieve licenties zonder ondersteunende wettelijke maatregelen tot stand komen. De jurisdicties die zijn onderzocht zijn Denemarken, Noorwegen, Duitsland en Nederland. }, note = { Onderzoek in opdracht van het Ministerie van OCW, Amsterdam, 1 september 2014. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } In dit rechtsvergelijkend onderzoek wordt geanalyseerd welke voor- en nadelen de invoering van een wettelijk stelsel van extended collective licensing (‘verruimde’ collectieve licentieovereenkomsten) kan hebben om de rights clearance van digitaliseringsprojecten van erfgoedinstellingen te vergemakkelijken. Daarbij wordt een vergelijking gemaakt met de situatie waarin collectieve licenties zonder ondersteunende wettelijke maatregelen tot stand komen. De jurisdicties die zijn onderzocht zijn Denemarken, Noorwegen, Duitsland en Nederland. |
| van Eechoud, M. Voices near and far: Introduction 2014, (Chapter in: The Work of Authorship, M.M.M. van Eechoud (ed.), Amsterdam: AUP 2014, p. 7-17. ISBN 9789089646354.). @inbook{vanEechoud2014, title = {Voices near and far: Introduction}, author = {van Eechoud, M.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Voicesnearandfar.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-12-19}, abstract = {The goal of this introduction is to ‘set the stage’ so to speak for the various explorations that follow, of notions of collaborative authorship and original works in academic thought, societal practice and as legal norms. To provide especially the readership not familiar with copyright lawmaking with a useful backdrop, what follows is a characterisation of the current state of copyright law in Europe. I shall briefly describe the role of the EU as primary actor in copyright reform. We can then sketch what the pertinent questions are on authorship and copyright subject-matter, a.k.a. original intellectual creations, and how the authors of each chapter have addressed these. The contributions in this volume all borrow from different disciplines. This introduction concludes with some observations on the many voices in academia that speak on creative practices, and on their relative proximity to copyright scholarship. Although technology and economics will continue to drive developments in intellectual property law, humanities research can (and should) have real impact on the quality of law and legal interpretation.}, note = {Chapter in: The Work of Authorship, M.M.M. van Eechoud (ed.), Amsterdam: AUP 2014, p. 7-17. ISBN 9789089646354.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {inbook} } The goal of this introduction is to ‘set the stage’ so to speak for the various explorations that follow, of notions of collaborative authorship and original works in academic thought, societal practice and as legal norms. To provide especially the readership not familiar with copyright lawmaking with a useful backdrop, what follows is a characterisation of the current state of copyright law in Europe. I shall briefly describe the role of the EU as primary actor in copyright reform. We can then sketch what the pertinent questions are on authorship and copyright subject-matter, a.k.a. original intellectual creations, and how the authors of each chapter have addressed these. The contributions in this volume all borrow from different disciplines. This introduction concludes with some observations on the many voices in academia that speak on creative practices, and on their relative proximity to copyright scholarship. Although technology and economics will continue to drive developments in intellectual property law, humanities research can (and should) have real impact on the quality of law and legal interpretation. |
Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 3 september 2014 (Deckmyn / Vandersteen) 2014, ( C-201/13 ). @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 3 september 2014 (Deckmyn / Vandersteen)}, author = {J.M. Breemen}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1459.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-12-18}, journal = {European Human Rights Cases}, number = {12}, pages = {657-662.}, abstract = { Grote Kamer. Auteursrecht. Uitleg parodie-exceptie. Vrijheid van meningsuiting. Politieke spotprent. }, note = { C-201/13 }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Grote Kamer. Auteursrecht. Uitleg parodie-exceptie. Vrijheid van meningsuiting. Politieke spotprent. |
| van Eechoud, M. 2014. @misc{, title = {Adapting the work}, author = {M.M.M. van Eechoud}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1461.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-12-18}, abstract = { My focus in this piece is on the interplay between the legal concepts of work, copy and adaptation in light of the now ubiquitous ‘new’ forms or genres of works that online networks enabled. Can European copyright law accommodate the increased fluidity of some of these work genres? What avenues might be taken to attenuate the gap between legal and social practices? Is a more flexible system of limitations enough? Or do we need a wholesale rethink of the work concept? Might a more relaxed notion of copying and especially of adapting suffice? What would that mean for the kind of copyright infringement analysis courts engage in? My ambition is to explore potential avenues for reform, and in doing so take on board some insights from non-legal disciplines, notably genre and adaptations studies. }, note = { In: The Work of Authorship, M.M.M. van Eechoud (ed.), Amsterdam: AUP 2014, p. 145-173. ISBN 9789089646354. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } My focus in this piece is on the interplay between the legal concepts of work, copy and adaptation in light of the now ubiquitous ‘new’ forms or genres of works that online networks enabled. Can European copyright law accommodate the increased fluidity of some of these work genres? What avenues might be taken to attenuate the gap between legal and social practices? Is a more flexible system of limitations enough? Or do we need a wholesale rethink of the work concept? Might a more relaxed notion of copying and especially of adapting suffice? What would that mean for the kind of copyright infringement analysis courts engage in? My ambition is to explore potential avenues for reform, and in doing so take on board some insights from non-legal disciplines, notably genre and adaptations studies. |
| van Gompel, S. 2014. @misc{, title = {Creativity, autonomy and personal touch: A critical appraisal of the CJEU's originality test for copyright}, author = {S.J. van Gompel}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1468.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-12-18}, abstract = { Copyright law’s originality threshold is not a high-to-attain standard. Recent case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) confirms that copyright extends to subject-matter that is original in the sense that it is the ‘author’s own intellectual creation’ (Infopaq International, 2009, § 37; Bezpe\v{c}nostní softwarová asociace, 2010, § 46; Football Association Premier League, 2011, § 97; Painer, 2011, § 87; Football Dataco, 2012, § 37; and SAS, 2012, § 45) and that no other criteria may be applied to determine its eligibility for protection. In the Eva-Maria Painer case, the Court clarified that an intellectual creation is the author’s own ‘if it reflects the author’s personality’ and that this is the case ‘if the author was able to express his creative abilities in the production of the work by making free and creative choices’ (2011, §§ 88–89). This was reiterated in the Football Dataco case, where it was once more emphasised that, for an intellectual creation to be original, the author must have stamped it with his ‘personal touch’ by making ‘free and creative choices’ during its production (2012, § 38). The meaning and substance of the CJEU’s originality criterion has not yet attracted much analytical scrutiny. In particular, the limits inherent in the CJEU’s originality standard have received little attention in legal doctrine – let alone in court decisions (although that is probably not where one would expect a critical review of the test be conducted in the first place). This is remarkable, seeing that copyright regulates such a wide variety of cultural production and may restrict the use of even the most low-key, routine creations that surround us in everyday life. A more critical and out-of-the-box reading of the ‘free and creative choices’-language suggests that the CJEU’s originality standard may perhaps impose more limitations than is currently recognised in legal discourse. For one thing, authors are of course not autonomous creators who work in a vacuum. Creative processes are contingent on many external factors. Cultural productions are usually made with audiences in mind and individual creators operate within social, technical and institutional environments with all of the attendant constraints. This implies that, in reality, the autonomy of authors to make free and creative choices is often naturally restricted. }, note = { In: The Work of Authorship, M.M.M. van Eechoud (ed.), Amsterdam: AUP 2014, p. 95-143. ISBN 9789089646354. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Copyright law’s originality threshold is not a high-to-attain standard. Recent case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) confirms that copyright extends to subject-matter that is original in the sense that it is the ‘author’s own intellectual creation’ (Infopaq International, 2009, § 37; Bezpečnostní softwarová asociace, 2010, § 46; Football Association Premier League, 2011, § 97; Painer, 2011, § 87; Football Dataco, 2012, § 37; and SAS, 2012, § 45) and that no other criteria may be applied to determine its eligibility for protection. In the Eva-Maria Painer case, the Court clarified that an intellectual creation is the author’s own ‘if it reflects the author’s personality’ and that this is the case ‘if the author was able to express his creative abilities in the production of the work by making free and creative choices’ (2011, §§ 88–89). This was reiterated in the Football Dataco case, where it was once more emphasised that, for an intellectual creation to be original, the author must have stamped it with his ‘personal touch’ by making ‘free and creative choices’ during its production (2012, § 38). The meaning and substance of the CJEU’s originality criterion has not yet attracted much analytical scrutiny. In particular, the limits inherent in the CJEU’s originality standard have received little attention in legal doctrine – let alone in court decisions (although that is probably not where one would expect a critical review of the test be conducted in the first place). This is remarkable, seeing that copyright regulates such a wide variety of cultural production and may restrict the use of even the most low-key, routine creations that surround us in everyday life. A more critical and out-of-the-box reading of the ‘free and creative choices’-language suggests that the CJEU’s originality standard may perhaps impose more limitations than is currently recognised in legal discourse. For one thing, authors are of course not autonomous creators who work in a vacuum. Creative processes are contingent on many external factors. Cultural productions are usually made with audiences in mind and individual creators operate within social, technical and institutional environments with all of the attendant constraints. This implies that, in reality, the autonomy of authors to make free and creative choices is often naturally restricted. |
Reassessing the challenge of the digital: An empirical perspective on authorship and copyright 2014. @misc{, title = {Reassessing the challenge of the digital: An empirical perspective on authorship and copyright}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1467.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-12-17}, abstract = { This chapter explores these perceived challenges of the digital for copyright, through ideas about authorship that underpin so-called creative practices today. It does so through a qualitative empirical study that involved semistructured interviews with ‘artists’ and ‘poets’ who use digital technology. The interviews sought to uncover the extent to which the participation of many people was characteristic of the interviewees’ work and their views about ‘authorship’. For example, is authorship of any significance to interviewee ‘artists’ and ‘poets’? If so, who do they consider to be the author? In situations where many have contributed, how and why do they attribute authorship to some contributors while denying it to others? Finally, why is authorship important to the interviewees, if at all, and does this bear any relation to copyright’s proprietary author? }, note = { In: The Work of Authorship, M.M.M. van Eechoud (ed.), Amsterdam: AUP 2014, p. 175-214. ISBN 9789089646354. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } This chapter explores these perceived challenges of the digital for copyright, through ideas about authorship that underpin so-called creative practices today. It does so through a qualitative empirical study that involved semistructured interviews with ‘artists’ and ‘poets’ who use digital technology. The interviews sought to uncover the extent to which the participation of many people was characteristic of the interviewees’ work and their views about ‘authorship’. For example, is authorship of any significance to interviewee ‘artists’ and ‘poets’? If so, who do they consider to be the author? In situations where many have contributed, how and why do they attribute authorship to some contributors while denying it to others? Finally, why is authorship important to the interviewees, if at all, and does this bear any relation to copyright’s proprietary author? |
| Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. 2014. @article{, title = {Improving Privacy Protection in the area of Behavioural Targeting / Betere privacybescherming op het gebied van behavioural targeting}, author = {F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1455.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-12-16}, note = { Short summary of PhD thesis in English and Dutch. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Bently, L., Biron, L. 2014. @misc{, title = {Discontinuities between legal conceptions of authorship and social practices: What, if anything, is to be done?}, author = {L. Bently and L. Biron}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1457.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-12-16}, abstract = { Authorship is central to the operation of copyright as a regulatory tool, but copyright law’s conception of ‘authorship’ appears to be ‘out of sync’ with a wide range of social practices: either copyright makes authors-in-law out of social ‘non-authors’, or vice versa. After offering three examples (scientific credit, conceptual art and literary editing)1 this contribution considers why these differences have emerged and whether these discontinuities should be thought of as a matter of concern. It appraises a number of academic proposals as to what might be done about these discontinuities, and offers its own suggestion, namely, the deployment of a more open-textured concept of authorship, one that is able to respond flexibly to varied contexts, social understandings and practices, but limited in application to matters of attribution. }, note = { In: The Work of Authorship, M.M.M. van Eechoud (ed.), Amsterdam: AUP 2014, p. 237-276. ISBN 9789089646354. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Authorship is central to the operation of copyright as a regulatory tool, but copyright law’s conception of ‘authorship’ appears to be ‘out of sync’ with a wide range of social practices: either copyright makes authors-in-law out of social ‘non-authors’, or vice versa. After offering three examples (scientific credit, conceptual art and literary editing)1 this contribution considers why these differences have emerged and whether these discontinuities should be thought of as a matter of concern. It appraises a number of academic proposals as to what might be done about these discontinuities, and offers its own suggestion, namely, the deployment of a more open-textured concept of authorship, one that is able to respond flexibly to varied contexts, social understandings and practices, but limited in application to matters of attribution. |
Creativity and the sense of collective ownership in theatre and popular music 2014. @misc{, title = {Creativity and the sense of collective ownership in theatre and popular music}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1458.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-12-16}, abstract = { The purpose of the research presented here has been to investigate empirically how practising artists, in art forms where production is predominantly of a collective nature, feel and think about the nature of their contribution to the finished whole. More precisely, the idea is to explore to which extent those involved in the collective production of art have a sense or feeling of ownership vis-a-vis the outcome of the creative process, and what they think this might entail in terms of financial and other rewards. On this basis, I wish to raise some questions regarding the role of current copyright law in relation to actual artistic practices. }, note = { In: The Work of Authorship, M.M.M. van Eechoud (ed.), Amsterdam: AUP 2014, p. 215-236. ISBN 9789089646354. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } The purpose of the research presented here has been to investigate empirically how practising artists, in art forms where production is predominantly of a collective nature, feel and think about the nature of their contribution to the finished whole. More precisely, the idea is to explore to which extent those involved in the collective production of art have a sense or feeling of ownership vis-a-vis the outcome of the creative process, and what they think this might entail in terms of financial and other rewards. On this basis, I wish to raise some questions regarding the role of current copyright law in relation to actual artistic practices. |
| Breemen, J. Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 3 september 2014 (Deckmyn / Vandersteen) European Human Rights Cases, 15 (12), pp. 657-662, 2014. @article{Breemen2014, title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 3 september 2014 (Deckmyn / Vandersteen)}, author = {Breemen, J.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/ehrc-2014-12-annotatie-deckmynvandersteen-j-m-breemen/}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-12-10}, journal = {European Human Rights Cases}, volume = {15}, number = {12}, pages = {657-662}, publisher = {Sdu Uitgevers}, abstract = {Grote Kamer. Auteursrecht. Uitleg parodie-exceptie. Vrijheid van meningsuiting. Politieke spotprent. Richtlijn 2001/29/EG art. 2, 3, 5 lid 3 (k). EVRM art. 10 lid 1 en 2.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Grote Kamer. Auteursrecht. Uitleg parodie-exceptie. Vrijheid van meningsuiting. Politieke spotprent. Richtlijn 2001/29/EG art. 2, 3, 5 lid 3 (k). EVRM art. 10 lid 1 en 2. |
| McGonagle, T. 2014. @techreport{, title = {Seminar and inter-regional dialogue on protection of journalists: Towards an effective framework of protection for the work of journalists and an end to impunity}, author = {T. McGonagle}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1451.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-12-09}, note = { Seminar and Inter-regional Dialogue on the protection of journalists, Strasbourg, 3 November 2014, organised by the Council of Europe, UNESCO, Centre for Freedom of the Media (CFOM), University of Sheffield and European Lawyer's Union/Union des Avocats Européens (ELU/UAE). }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| Arnbak, A. Expert Panel Report: A New Governance Model for Communications Security? 2014. @techreport{, title = {Expert Panel Report: A New Governance Model for Communications Security?}, author = {A.M. Arnbak}, url = {https://freedom-to-tinker.com/blog/axel/expert-panel-report-a-new-governance-model-for-communications-security/}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-12-09}, abstract = { Today, the vulnerable state of electronic communications security dominates headlines across the globe, while surveillance, money and power increasingly permeate the ?cybersecurity? policy arena. With the stakes so high, how should communications security be regulated? Deirdre Mulligan (UC Berkeley), Ashkan Soltani (independent, Washington Post), Ian Brown (Oxford) and Michel van Eeten (TU Delft) weighed in on this proposition at an expert panel on my doctoral project at the Amsterdam Information Influx conference. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } Today, the vulnerable state of electronic communications security dominates headlines across the globe, while surveillance, money and power increasingly permeate the ?cybersecurity? policy arena. With the stakes so high, how should communications security be regulated? Deirdre Mulligan (UC Berkeley), Ashkan Soltani (independent, Washington Post), Ian Brown (Oxford) and Michel van Eeten (TU Delft) weighed in on this proposition at an expert panel on my doctoral project at the Amsterdam Information Influx conference. |
| van Eijk, N. KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi, (133), pp. 7657-7658., 2014. @article{, title = {Kroniek Telecommunicatierecht}, author = {N.A.N.M. van Eijk}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1453.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-12-09}, journal = {KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi}, number = {133}, pages = {7657-7658.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Breemen, J., Breemen, V. KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi, (133), pp. 7655-7657., 2014. @article{, title = {Kroniek Mediarecht}, author = {J.M. Breemen and V.E. Breemen}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1454.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-12-09}, journal = {KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi}, number = {133}, pages = {7655-7657.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| McGonagle, T., Oostveen, M. Tomorrow’s news: bright, mutualized and open? 2014. @techreport{, title = {Tomorrow’s news: bright, mutualized and open?}, author = {M.A.A. Oostveen and T. McGonagle}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1450.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-12-05}, note = { Panel report of session Tomorrow’s news: bright, mutualized and open? at the Information Influx Conference. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| Breemen, J. Mass-digitization and the 'dream' of universal access 2014. @techreport{, title = {Mass-digitization and the 'dream' of universal access}, author = {J.M. Breemen}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1447.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-12-02}, note = { Panel report of session Mass-digitization and the 'dream' of universal access at the Information Influx Conference. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| Helberger, N. 'Personaliseren sites leidt tot manipulatie' 2014. @misc{, title = {'Personaliseren sites leidt tot manipulatie'}, author = {N. Helberger}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1448.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-12-02}, journal = {Financieel Dagblad}, pages = {3-5.}, note = { Interview verschenen in het Financieel Dagblad van 29 november 2014. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } |
| Breemen, V. United in diversity - The future of the public mission 2014. @techreport{, title = {United in diversity - The future of the public mission}, author = {V.E. Breemen}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1446.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-11-28}, note = { Panel report of session United in diversity- the future of the public mission at the Information Influx Conference. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| Dommering, E., van Eijk, N. NRC Handelsblad, 2014. @article{, title = {Opstelten slaat onwettig onze data op: Bij opslag van kentekens en internetverkeer negeert de regering het Europese Hof, aldus Egbert Dommering en Nico van Eijk}, author = {E.J. Dommering and N.A.N.M. van Eijk}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1444.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-11-27}, journal = {NRC Handelsblad}, note = { Verschenen op de Opiniepagina van NRC Handelsblad, 26 november 2014. Publicatie ook beschikbaar op Netkwesties. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Fejzulla, E., Irion, K., Ledger, M., Svensson, S. The Independence and Functioning of the Audiovisual Media Authority in Albania Amsterdam/Brussels/Budapest/Tirana, 2014. @techreport{, title = {The Independence and Functioning of the Audiovisual Media Authority in Albania}, author = {M. Ledger and S. Svensson and E. Fejzulla and K. Irion}, url = {http://www.indireg.eu/wp-content/uploads/AMA/Indireg-AMA-Report-Nov11.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-11-27}, address = {Amsterdam/Brussels/Budapest/Tirana}, note = { Study commissioned by the Council of Europe, October 2014. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {techreport} } |
| Arnbak, A. De unieke sleutel tot onze digitale informatie 2014. @periodical{, title = {De unieke sleutel tot onze digitale informatie}, author = {A.M. Arnbak}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1442.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-11-25}, journal = {Financieel Dagblad}, note = { Column van 25 november 2014. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {periodical} } |
| Irion, K. Global Media Journal German Edition, (2), 2014. @article{, title = {International Assistance and Media Democratization in the Western Balkans: A Cross-National Comparison}, author = {K. Irion}, url = {http://www.db-thueringen.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-31141/GMJ8_Irion_Jusic_final.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-11-21}, journal = {Global Media Journal German Edition}, number = {2}, abstract = { International media assistance programs accompanied the democratic media transition in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Macedonia and Serbia with varying intensity. These countries untertook a range of media reforms to conform with accession requirements of the European Union (EU) and the standards of the Council of Europe, among others. This article explores the nexus between the democratic transformation of the media and international media assistance (IMA) as constrained by the local political conditions in the five countries of the Western Balkans. It aims to enhance the understanding of conditions and factors that influence media institution building in the region and evaluates the role of international assistance programs and conditionality mechanisms herein. The cross-national analysis concludes that the effects of IMA are highly constrained by the local context. A decade of IMA of varying intensity is not sufficient to construct media institutions when, in order to function properly, they have to outperform their local context. From today’s vantage point it becomes obvious, that in the short-term scaling-up IMA does not necessarily improve outcomes. The experiences in the region suggest that imported solutions have not been sufficiently cognitive of all aspects of local conditions and international strategies have tended to be rather schematic and have lacked strategic approaches to promote media policy stability, credible media reform and implementation. To a certain extent, the loss of IMA effectiveness is also self-inflicted. }, note = { Pre-publication version also available at SSRN. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } International media assistance programs accompanied the democratic media transition in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Macedonia and Serbia with varying intensity. These countries untertook a range of media reforms to conform with accession requirements of the European Union (EU) and the standards of the Council of Europe, among others. This article explores the nexus between the democratic transformation of the media and international media assistance (IMA) as constrained by the local political conditions in the five countries of the Western Balkans. It aims to enhance the understanding of conditions and factors that influence media institution building in the region and evaluates the role of international assistance programs and conditionality mechanisms herein. The cross-national analysis concludes that the effects of IMA are highly constrained by the local context. A decade of IMA of varying intensity is not sufficient to construct media institutions when, in order to function properly, they have to outperform their local context. From today’s vantage point it becomes obvious, that in the short-term scaling-up IMA does not necessarily improve outcomes. The experiences in the region suggest that imported solutions have not been sufficiently cognitive of all aspects of local conditions and international strategies have tended to be rather schematic and have lacked strategic approaches to promote media policy stability, credible media reform and implementation. To a certain extent, the loss of IMA effectiveness is also self-inflicted. |
| Irion, K. 2014, (In: M. Rotenberg, J. Horwitz & J. Scott, eds., Visons of Privacy in a Modern Age, New York: New Press, 2015. Chapter also available in Chinese: https://www.amazon.cn/%E5%9B%BE%E4%B9%A6/dp/B074JYGR3B ). @misc{Irion2014, title = {Accountability unchained: Bulk Data Retention, Preemptive Surveillance, and Transatlantic Data Protection}, author = {Irion, K.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/accountability-unchained-kristina-irion_final/}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-11-21}, abstract = {The innovations on which today’s Internet proliferated have been a major gift from its founders and the US government to the world. Ever since the rise of the Internet it has attracted utopian ideas of a free and borderless cyberspace, a men-made global commons that serves an international community of users. First commercialization and now the prevalence of state surveillance have significantly depreciated the utopist patina. Internet’s borderless nature which was once heralded to rise above the nation state has actually enabled some states to rise above their borders when engaging in mass surveillance that affects users on a global scale. International human rights law and emerging Internet governance principles have not been authoritative enough to protect users’ privacy and the confidentiality of communications. More or less openly, Western democracies embarked on the path of mass surveillance with the aim to fight crime and defend national security. This chapter’s focus is on the safeguards and accountability of mass surveillance in Europe and the US and how this affects transatlantic relations. It queries whether national systems of checks and balances are still adequate in relation to the growth and the globalization of surveillance capabilities. Lacking safeguards and accountability at the national level can exacerbate in the context of transnational surveillance. It can lead to asymmetries between countries which are precisely at the core of the transatlantic rift over mass surveillance. The chapter concludes with a brief review of proposals how to reduce them. }, note = {In: M. Rotenberg, J. Horwitz & J. Scott, eds., Visons of Privacy in a Modern Age, New York: New Press, 2015. Chapter also available in Chinese: https://www.amazon.cn/%E5%9B%BE%E4%B9%A6/dp/B074JYGR3B }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } The innovations on which today’s Internet proliferated have been a major gift from its founders and the US government to the world. Ever since the rise of the Internet it has attracted utopian ideas of a free and borderless cyberspace, a men-made global commons that serves an international community of users. First commercialization and now the prevalence of state surveillance have significantly depreciated the utopist patina. Internet’s borderless nature which was once heralded to rise above the nation state has actually enabled some states to rise above their borders when engaging in mass surveillance that affects users on a global scale. International human rights law and emerging Internet governance principles have not been authoritative enough to protect users’ privacy and the confidentiality of communications. More or less openly, Western democracies embarked on the path of mass surveillance with the aim to fight crime and defend national security. This chapter’s focus is on the safeguards and accountability of mass surveillance in Europe and the US and how this affects transatlantic relations. It queries whether national systems of checks and balances are still adequate in relation to the growth and the globalization of surveillance capabilities. Lacking safeguards and accountability at the national level can exacerbate in the context of transnational surveillance. It can lead to asymmetries between countries which are precisely at the core of the transatlantic rift over mass surveillance. The chapter concludes with a brief review of proposals how to reduce them. |
| Irion, K. 2014, ( Pre-publication.<br /> In: E. Psychogiopoulou (ed.), <em>Cultural Governance and the European Union</em>, Houndmills and New York: Palgrave MacMillan 2015 in press.<br /> Also available at SSRN: <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=2529044" target="_blank">http://ssrn.com/abstract=2529044</a> ). @misc{, title = {Cultural diversity in the digital age: EU competences, policies and regulations for diverse audiovisual and online content}, author = {Irion, K.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1441.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-11-21}, abstract = { Cultural diversity is a multifaceted concept that differs from the notion of media pluralism. However, the two concepts share important concerns particularly as regards content production, content distribution and access to content. This chapter considers the EU’s role in contributing to diverse audiovisual and online content and assesses its limits. Although a signatory of the UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, the ability of the EU to foster cultural diversity in the digital environment is confined on account of its constrained competences in the field of audiovisual media and online content. Notwithstanding, the EU develops a number of substantive policies that benefit the creation and circulation of cultural content either in an explicit or in an implicit manner. Following a value-chain approach, this chapter discusses the complementary role of various EU sectoral regulations towards this aim. The analysis focuses on the Audiovisual Media Services (AVMS) Directive (Directive 2007/65/EC \textendash 2010/13/EU) and various aspects of the EU regulatory framework for electronic communications, particularly in relation to non-discriminatory access to bottlenecks in the distribution infrastructure and online platforms. The chapter advances the argument that existing EU policies have an important role to play for ensuring the free circulation of, and access to, cultural content. At the same time, aside from the cultural quotas in the above mentioned AVMS Directive, EU activity is less prominent in the field of content production. The analysis concludes by stressing the complexity of promoting cultural diversity in light of both cultural content supply and demand considerations. It also emphasises the importance of emerging policy issues, in particular net neutrality and findability. }, note = { Pre-publication.<br /> In: E. Psychogiopoulou (ed.), <em>Cultural Governance and the European Union</em>, Houndmills and New York: Palgrave MacMillan 2015 in press.<br /> Also available at SSRN: <a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=2529044" target="_blank">http://ssrn.com/abstract=2529044</a> }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Cultural diversity is a multifaceted concept that differs from the notion of media pluralism. However, the two concepts share important concerns particularly as regards content production, content distribution and access to content. This chapter considers the EU’s role in contributing to diverse audiovisual and online content and assesses its limits.<br /> Although a signatory of the UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, the ability of the EU to foster cultural diversity in the digital environment is confined on account of its constrained competences in the field of audiovisual media and online content. Notwithstanding, the EU develops a number of substantive policies that benefit the creation and circulation of cultural content either in an explicit or in an implicit manner. Following a value-chain approach, this chapter discusses the complementary role of various EU sectoral regulations towards this aim. The analysis focuses on the Audiovisual Media Services (AVMS) Directive (Directive 2007/65/EC – 2010/13/EU) and various aspects of the EU regulatory framework for electronic communications, particularly in relation to non-discriminatory access to bottlenecks in the distribution infrastructure and online platforms.<br /> The chapter advances the argument that existing EU policies have an important role to play for ensuring the free circulation of, and access to, cultural content. At the same time, aside from the cultural quotas in the above mentioned AVMS Directive, EU activity is less prominent in the field of content production. The analysis concludes by stressing the complexity of promoting cultural diversity in light of both cultural content supply and demand considerations. It also emphasises the importance of emerging policy issues, in particular net neutrality and findability. |
| van Eechoud, M. Annotatie bij Vzr. Rb. Den Haag 24 februari 2014 (SDC Verifier / Femto Engineering) 2014. @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij Vzr. Rb. Den Haag 24 februari 2014 (SDC Verifier / Femto Engineering)}, author = {van Eechoud, M.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1435.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-11-13}, journal = {AMI}, number = {5}, pages = {169-173.}, abstract = { Vordering wapperverbod. Software door auteurs in meerdere landen gemaakt. Internationaal privaatrecht. Conflictregel. Vraag aan wie auteursrechten toekomen beheerst door recht van elk land waarvoor bescherming wordt ingeroepen (lex protectionis). }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Vordering wapperverbod. Software door auteurs in meerdere landen gemaakt. Internationaal privaatrecht. Conflictregel. Vraag aan wie auteursrechten toekomen beheerst door recht van elk land waarvoor bescherming wordt ingeroepen (lex protectionis). |
| van Eechoud, M. Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 3 april 2014 (Hi Hotel / Spoering) 2014, ( C-387/12 ). @misc{, title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 3 april 2014 (Hi Hotel / Spoering)}, author = {van Eechoud, M.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1436.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-11-13}, journal = {AMI}, number = {4}, pages = {117-120.}, abstract = { Internationale bevoegdheid rechter bij grensoverschrijdende inbreuk auteursrecht. EEX-Verordening (EG) nr. 44/2001. Bepaling van plaats waar schadebrengende feit zich heeft voorgedaan. Plaats van intreden beweerde schade. }, note = { C-387/12 }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {misc} } Internationale bevoegdheid rechter bij grensoverschrijdende inbreuk auteursrecht. EEX-Verordening (EG) nr. 44/2001. Bepaling van plaats waar schadebrengende feit zich heeft voorgedaan. Plaats van intreden beweerde schade. |
| Arnbak, A. Deltaplan voor online privacy & beveiliging Het Financieele Dagblad, 2014. @article{, title = {Deltaplan voor online privacy & beveiliging}, author = {A.M. Arnbak}, url = {https://www.axelarnbak.nl/2014/11/04/derde-column-in-financieele-dagblad-deltaplan-online-privacy-en-beveiliging/}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-11-06}, journal = {Het Financieele Dagblad}, note = { Column, 28 oktober 2014. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| Guibault, L., Quintais, J. Copyright, technology and the exploitation of audiovisual works in the EU IRIS Plus, (4), pp. 9-24., 2014, ( Lead article in IRIS plus 2014-4. ). @article{, title = {Copyright, technology and the exploitation of audiovisual works in the EU}, author = {Guibault, L. and Quintais, J.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1488.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-11-01}, journal = {IRIS Plus}, number = {4}, pages = {9-24.}, note = { Lead article in IRIS plus 2014-4. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } |
| van der Sloot, B. De noodzaak om privacy als publiek belang te herfomuleren Christen Democratische Verkenningen, (3), pp. 125-132., 2014. @article{, title = {De noodzaak om privacy als publiek belang te herfomuleren}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1428.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-10-30}, journal = {Christen Democratische Verkenningen}, number = {3}, pages = {125-132.}, abstract = { Privacy wordt tegenwoordig geformuleerd als individueel recht dat bescherming biedt aan persoonlijke belangen. Deze benadering is echter niet langer houdbaar in Big Data-processen, die niet op specifieke individuen zijn gericht, maar potentieel eenieder betreffen. Privacy zou dan ook moeten worden geherformuleerd als maatschappelijke waarde. Een dergelijke benadering ondervangt de knelpunten van het huidige privacyparadigma en kan voorkomen dat grootscheepse gegevensverzameling door inlichtingendiensten en instellingen elementaire rechtsbeginselen schendt. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Privacy wordt tegenwoordig geformuleerd als individueel recht dat bescherming biedt aan persoonlijke belangen. Deze benadering is echter niet langer houdbaar in Big Data-processen, die niet op specifieke individuen zijn gericht, maar potentieel eenieder betreffen. Privacy zou dan ook moeten worden geherformuleerd als maatschappelijke waarde. Een dergelijke benadering ondervangt de knelpunten van het huidige privacyparadigma en kan voorkomen dat grootscheepse gegevensverzameling door inlichtingendiensten en instellingen elementaire rechtsbeginselen schendt. |
| van der Sloot, B. SEW - Tijdschrift voor Europees en economisch recht, (10), pp. 420-431., 2014. @article{, title = {Welcome to the jungle: de aansprakelijkheid van internet-intermediairs voor privacyschendingen in Europa}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1429.pdf}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-10-30}, journal = {SEW - Tijdschrift voor Europees en economisch recht}, number = {10}, pages = {420-431.}, abstract = { In Europa zijn globaal drie regimes van toepassing op de aansprakelijkheid van internetintermediairs voor privacyschendingen begaan door hun gebruikers via hun netwerk. Dit zijn de e-commercerichtlijn, die providers onder bepaalde voorwaarden uitsluit van aansprakelijkheid, de Richtlijn bescherming persoonsgegevens, die providers die actief persoonsgegevens verwerken tal van plichten en verantwoordelijkheden oplegt, en de in het EVRM vervatte vrijheid van meningsuiting, die internetproviders onder voorwaarden bepaalde privileges en vrijheden toekent. Deze stelsels zijn ieder op een eigen gebied van toepassing, maar kennen ook een gedeeltelijke overlap, terwijl ze elk een geheel eigen ration en beschermingsregime kennen. In de praktijk brengt dit rechtsongelijkheid en onzekerheid met zich mee, voornamelijk voor providers die actief betrokken zijn bij de inrichting van online platforms. }, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } In Europa zijn globaal drie regimes van toepassing op de aansprakelijkheid van internetintermediairs voor privacyschendingen begaan door hun gebruikers via hun netwerk. Dit zijn de e-commercerichtlijn, die providers onder bepaalde voorwaarden uitsluit van aansprakelijk |