| Staff |
 |
|
Catherine
Jasserand |
|
editor / researcher |
| |
Instituut
voor
Informatierecht (IViR)
Bezoekadres
Korte Spinhuissteeg 3
1012 CG Amsterdam
Postadres
Kloveniersburgwal 48
1012 CX Amsterdam
|
|
kamer
B 1.12
|
|
tel:
+31 20 525 3452 |
| fax:
+31 20 - 525 3033 |
  |
| |

|
|
|
|
|
Curriculum Vitae
|
|
Catherine Jasserand
studied law in France where she obtained a maîtrise
in public law (Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne)
and a postgraduate degree in European law (DESS,
Université Paris 1 - Panthéon Sorbonne). She also holds
an LL.M. in Intellectual Property and New Technology
Law from the University of California, Berkeley. She
qualified as a lawyer in France and in the USA (New York
Bar). Catherine
worked as a summer research assistant to Pamela
Samuelson and as a legal adviser in an American law firm
in Brussels. She has also held different positions in
European institutions (the European Parliament and the European
Central Bank) and has worked as a
European lobbyist in finance.
In 2010, Catherine joined
IViR and worked on different projects (duties of care
for Internet service providers, Creative Commons and
design as well as the interface between copyright and
public sector information for the WIPO). Since 2012, she
is working as an editor and coordinator for
IRIS, the monthly newsletter on audiovisual law
published by the
European Audiovisual Observatory.
|
Publications
|
Critical views on the French approach to "net
neutrality", Journal of Internet Law, 2013-9, p. 18-28.
16.04.2013
|
|
Hosting providers’ liability: Cour de Cassation puts an
end to the notice and stay down rule,
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice,
2013-3, p. 192-193.
In applying the rules on hosting
providers' liability, French lower courts have
shifted from a notice and take down rule (provided
by Article 14 of the E-Commerce Directive and
Article 6 of the French implementing law) to a
notice and stay down rule (created by the judges).
This interpretation was confirmed in 2011 by the
Paris Court of Appeal but overruled by the Cour de
cassation on 12 July 2012.
26.02.2013
|
|
Youtube guilty but not liable for late removal of
infringing material,
Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice,
2012-11, p. 790-791.
The pre-edited version is
available
here on the
Kluwer Copyright Blog.
06.11.2012
|
Answer to the HADOPI's
public consultation on "exceptions to copyright and
related rights", 15 July 2012, published on
Juriscom.net.
La réponse au questionnaire de
l’HADOPI se focalise sur l’évolution possible du
système des exceptions vers une approche ouverte de
type fair use et est fondée principalement sur les
éléments de réflexions énoncés par le Professeur
Bernt Hugenholtz et le Professeur Martin Senftleben
dans leur étude « Fair use in Europe. In search of
flexibilities ».
06.11.2012
|
(with P.B. Hugenholtz)
Using Copyright to Promote Access to Public Sector
Information: A Comparative Survey, Part III of a study
commissioned by WIPO on Using Copyright to Promote
Access to Information and Creative Content.
This study, which is part
of a three-part report on Using Copyright to Enhance
Access to Information and Creative Content, examines the
role that copyright plays in facilitating access to and
reuse of public sector information. It briefly describes
the laws, national policies and government practices
relating to the reutilization of public sector
information that are currently in place, or being
developed, in seven WIPO Member States: France, Japan,
Mexico, New Zealand, Uganda, United Kingdom and the
United States.
See also
http://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=202179
05.06.2012
|
Creative Commons licences and design: Are the two
compatible?, JIPITEC,
2011-2, p. 131-142.
28.09.2011
|
(with N.A.N.M. van Eijk, T.M.
van Engers (Leibniz Center for Law), C. Wiersma
and
W. Abel)
Moving Towards Balance: A study into duties of care on
the Internet, WODC / University of Amsterdam, 2010, 125
p.
Commissioned by the
WODC (Research and Documentation Centre of the
Ministry of Security and Justice), research has been
conducted on duties of care on the Internet, more
specifically from the perspective of Internet
service providers. The situation in four countries -
the Netherlands, the UK, Germany and France - was
researched. The (self-)regulation with respect to
five separate themes (Internet security and safety,
child pornography, copyright, identity fraud and the
trade in stolen goods through Internet platforms)
was identified. In addition to this, a significant
number of interviews with stakeholders were
conducted.
09.11.2010
|
|
|
|
Updated
16.04.2013
|
|
|
|