| Staff |
|

|
| Lucie
Guibault |
| Assistant
professor |
| |
| Institute
for Information Law (IViR)
Visiting
address
Korte Spinhuissteeg 3
1012 CG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Post
address
Kloveniersburgwal 48
1012 CX Amsterdam
The Netherlands
|
| kamer
B2.03 |
| tel:
+31 20 - 525 39 47 |
| fax:
+31 20 - 525 30 33 |
| e-mail:
L.Guibault@uva.nl |
| |

|
|
|
|
|
Curriculum Vitae
|
Lucie Guibault is
assistant professor of copyright and intellectual
property law at the Institute for Information Law of the
University of Amsterdam (UvA). Born and raised in
Canada, she studied law at the Université de Montréal
[LL.B. (1988) and LL.M. (1995)] and recently received
her doctorate from the University of Amsterdam, where
she defended her thesis on Copyright Limitations and
Contracts: An Analysis of the Contractual Overridability
of Limitations on Copyright. She joined the
Institute for Information Law in 1997.
Dr. Guibault is specialized in international and
comparative copyright and intellectual property law, and
takes part in national and international conferences.
She is in charge of the coordination of the
International Copyright Law Summer Course. She is also
correspondent for Canada and the Netherlands for the
German legal periodical Computer
Law Review International.
|
Publications
|
(with
N. Helberger,
E.H. Janssen, N.A.N.M. van Eijk,
C.J.
Angelopoulos, J.V.J.
van Hoboken, E. Swart, et al.)
User-Created-Content: Supporting a participative
Information Society, Final Report, Study carried
out for the European Commission by
IDATE, TNO and IViR, 2008.
28.10.2009
|
(with
M.M.M. van Eechoud,
P.B. Hugenholtz,
S. van Gompel and
N. Helberger)
Harmonizing European Copyright Law: The Challenges of
Better Lawmaking, Information Law Series 19, Alphen
aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International 2009.
Nobody likes today’s
copyright law. Widespread unauthorized use of copyright material proliferates
with impunity, while citizens and users protest that intrusive copyright
and related rights law stifle cultural expression. Equipment manufacturers
and intermediaries complain about yet more security’ features
that complicate their products and services and encumber marketing, while
content owners desperately want enforcement to work. And of course it is
crucial that whatever regulatory instruments come into play must not age
prematurely in Internet time.
The European Union faces the daunting challenge of articulating coherent
copyright policies that satisfy these contradictory multiple demands. Yet
the legal framework must conform to the European Union’s remit of fostering
economic growth in a common market, while respecting the national traditions
of its still growing family of Member States. Clearly, an extraordinary balancing
act is called for if justice is to be done to all of the private and public
interests affected.
So how has the European acquis communautaire scored on these issues so far?
In this groundbreaking study the Institute for Information Law of the University
of Amsterdam brings its extensive academic expertise to bear on this question.
The authors scrutinize the present law as laid down in the seven copyright
and related rights directives, against the background of the relevant international
standards of the Berne Convention, the TRIPs agreement, and the WIPO Internet
Treaties. They map out in detail the degree to which certain areas of copyright
have been harmonized as they expose the gaps and inconsistencies in the acquis
and the urgent unresolved issues that persist. They identify the EU’s
ambitions in relation to its present and future competences (following the
Lisbon Reform) to regulate copyright, and to its Better Regulation agenda.
Following a comprehensive analysis of almost two decades of regulatory intervention,
they move on to the salient current trends that point toward a more coherent
and balanced European copyright law.
13.10.2009
|
|
Creative
Commons: Struggling to ‘Keep it Simple’,
in E. Schweighofer & P. Sint (Ed.), Conference
Proceedings KnowRight 08, Wenen: Österreichische
Computer Gesellschaft 2008, p. 75-83.
06.05.2009
|
|
Accommodating
the Needs of iConsumers: Making Sure They Get Their
Money’s Worth of Digital Entertainment,
Journal of Consumer Policy, Volume 31, Issue 4
(2008), p. 409.d
01.11.2008
|
(with G. Westkamp, T.
Rieber-Mohn, et al.)
Study
on the Implementation and Effect in Member States' laws
of Directive 2001/29/EC on the Harmonisation of Certain
Aspects of Copyright and Related Rights in the
Information Society, report to the European
Commission, DG Internal Market, February 2007.
This study,
commissioned by the European Commission, examines the
application of Directive 2001/29/EC in the light of
the development of the digital market. Its purpose is
to consider how Member States have implemented the
Directive into national law and to assist the
Commission in evaluating whether the Directive, as
currently formulated, remains the appropriate response
to the continuing challenges faced by the stakeholders
concerned, such as rights holders, commercial users,
consumers, educational and scientific users. As set
out in specifications of the study set out by the
Commission, its aim is "to assess the role that
the Directive has played in fostering the digital
market for goods and services in the four years since
its adoption". The impact of the Directive on the
development of digital (chiefly online) business
models, therefore, will be the focal point of our
enquiry throughout this study.
22.03.2007
|
(with S.J. van Gompel) Collective
Management in the European Union, also published in:
Daniel Gervais (ed.), Collective Management of
Copyright and Related Rights, The Hague, Kluwer Law
International, 2006, p. 117-152.
09.03.2007
|
Wrapping
Information in Contract: How Does it Affect the Public
Domain? in: L. Guibault and P.B.
Hugenholtz, The Future of the Public Domain -
Identifying the Commons in Information Law,
Information Law Series 16, The Hague: Kluwer Law
International 2006, p. 87-104.
Contracts are an
essential tool in the distribution of information. If
a specific element of information has any commercial
value at all, its access and use will most likely be
governed by the terms of a license, whether it is
protected by an intellectual property or not. The
central question addressed in this chapter is whether
the use of contracts with respect to the distribution
of public domain information bears any impact on the
supply of information and on the composition of the
public domain. Would contracts that restrict the use
of public domain information or limit the exercise of
uses privileged under the law be actually enforced by
the courts? If so, would the use of contracts in the
trade of information tend to increase the amount of
information available to the public anyway? Or would
it, on the contrary, withdraw from the public domain
some elements of information that were until then
freely available?
09.03.2007
|
|
P.B.
Hugenholtz, M.M.M. van
Eechoud, S.J. van Gompel,
et al.
The
Recasting of Copyright & Related Rights for the
Knowledge Economy, report to the European
Commission, DG Internal Market, November 2006, 308 p.
See also the executive
summary.
Study carried out by
the Institute for Information Law for the European
Commission (DG Internal Market). Chapters 1 and 2
describe and examine the existing 'acquis
communautaire' in the field of copyright and related
(neighbouring) rights, with special focus on
inconsistencies and unclarities. Chapters 3-6 deal
with distinct issues that were identified a priori by
the European Commission as meriting special attention:
possible extension of the term of protection of
phonograms (Chapter 3), possible alignment of the term
of protection of co-written musical works (Chapter 4),
the problems connected to multiple copyright
ownership, including the issue of 'orphan works'
(Chapter 5), and copyright awareness among consumers
(Chapter 6). Chapter 7 provides an overall assessment
of the benefits and drawbacks of the fifteen years of
harmonisation of copyright and related rights in the
EU and dwells on regulatory alternatives.
10.01.2007
|
(with P.B.
Hugenholtz, eds.) The Future of the Public Domain
- Identifying the Commons in Information Law,
Information Law Series 16, The Hague: Kluwer Law
International 2006 (ISBN 9041124357).
The presence of a
robust public domain is an essential precondition for
cultural, social and economic development and for a
healthy democratic process. But the public domain is
under pressure as a result of the ongoing march
towards an information economy.
This book takes a broad, 'information law' oriented
approach towards the question of preservering the
public domain, in which a wide range of interrelated
legal questions converge.
Thirteen contributions from academia worldwide make up
the present book, addressing the future of the public
domain from a different angle. In addition, all
authors were invited to reflect upon the notion and
role of the public domain in the context of
information law and policy.
Read chapter 1:
The
Future of the Public Domain. An introduction.
16.06.2006
|
(with O.L.
van Daalen) Unravelling the myth around open
source licences : An analysis from a Dutch and European
law perspective, Information technology & law
series 8, The Hague: T.M.C.
Asser Press 2006 (ISBN 9067042145).
This study gives an
overview of the current legal situation regarding the
use of open source software licences and investigates
how the most commonly used open source software
licences measure up to Dutch and European law.
By its in-depth analysis and clear conclusions, this
book contributes to the understanding of this complex
field that policy makers, regulators, and academics so
crucially require. Taking the provisions of the GNU
GPL, the BSD, and the Mozilla Public Licence as
examples, it investigates the implications of open
source licensing from a private law, copyright law and
patent law perspective. It also takes a brief look at
the issue of the enforcement of these licences. To
facilitate the use and enforcement of open source
software licences in Europe, and more particularly in
the Netherlands, the authors conclude their study by
making a number of recommendations for the adaptation
of the licence terms with a view to enhancing their
compliance with the legal requirements.
See also the
draft
version of this book.
01.02.2006
|
(with N.
Helberger)
Copyright
Law and Consumer Protection, European Consumer
Law Group, February 2005.
Policy conclusions of the European Consumer Law Group
(ECLG) based on a study carried out by L. Guibault and
N. Helberger.
The purpose of this
study is to provide an overview of certain key aspects
of the relationship between copyright law and consumer
protection. More particularly, the paper concentrates
on what would appear today as the most problematic
issue, from the perspective of the consumer,
understood in the narrow sense of the word, namely the
implementation of technological protection measures
(TPM) and digital rights management (DRM) systems and
its implication for the exercise of the private use
exemption.
20.05.2005
|
(with R. Melzer)
'The
Legal Protection of Broadcast Signals', IRIS plus,
2004-10.
24.11.2004
|
‘A
quand l'octroi de licences transfrontières pour
l'utilisation de droits d'auteur et de droits voisins en
Europe?’, Les Cahiers de Propriété
Intellectuelle, vol. 16, 2004-HS (Hors série), p.
189-208.
03.11.2004
|
‘Vous
qui téléchargez des oeuvres de l'Internet, pourrait-on
savoir qui vous êtes?’, Revue du Droit des
Technologies de l'Information, 2004-18, p. 9-31.
03.11.2004
|
(with P.B.
Hugenholtz),
Copyright
contract law: towards a statutory regulation? Study
conducted on commission for
the department of Scientific Research and Documentation
Centre (WODC) of the Dutch Ministry of Justice,August
2004 (Text in the Dutch language).
For an English
translation of the Summary, please
click
here
06.08.2004
|
| ‘The
nature and scope of limitations and exceptions to
copyright and neighbouring rights with regard to general
interest missions for the transmission of knowledge:
prospects for their adaptation to the digital
environment’, Copyright Bulletin December
2003.
Published 28.11.2003
|
| ‘The
reprography levies across the European Union’, L.M.C.R.
Guibault, March 2003.
Published 29.04.2003
|
(with P.B.
Hugenholtz & S.M. van
Geffen),
‘The
Future of Levies in a Digital Environment’, March
2003.
Published 24.03.2003
|
(with R.B.
Bakels & P.B.
Hugenholtz),
European
Parliament Hearing on Software Patentability
(Contribution IViR).
Published 27.11.2002
|
| ‘Le
tir manqué de la Directive européenne sur le droit
d'auteur dans la société de l'information’, Cahiers
de propriété intellectuelle, 2003/15, pp. 537-573.
Published 08.10.2002
|
| (with P.B.
Hugenholtz; assisted by M.A.R.
Vermunt & M.
Berghuis), ‘Study
on the conditions applicable to contracts relating to
intellectual property in the European Union’,
final report, study commissioned by the EC (May 2002).
Published 27.06.2002
|
Copyright
Limitations and Contracts. An Analysis of the
Contractual Overridability of Limitations on Copyright,
Information
Law Series Vol. 9, London / The Hague / Boston:
Kluwer Law International, February 2002, 392 pp.,
hardbound (ISBN 90-411-9867-9).
Traditional copyright
law strikes a delicate balance between an author’s
control of original material and society’s interest
in the free flow of ideas, information, and commerce.
In today’s digitally networked environment, this
balance has shifted dramatically to one side, as
powerful rights holders contractually impose terms and
conditions of use far beyond the bounds set by
copyright law. This vitally significant book explores
this conflict from its gestation through its current
manifestations to its future lineaments and potential
consequences.
Focusing on statutory
copyright limitations that enshrine constitutional
rights such as freedom of expression and privacy,
foster dissemination of knowledge, safeguard
competition, and protect authors from market failure, Copyright
Limitations and Contracts clearly explains the
rationale for these limitations and questions the
legality of overriding them by contractual means. The
author finds a complex array of factors clouding the
emergence of coherent rules in the matter, among them
the nature of the contract (e.g., fully negotiated vs.
“shrink-wrap”), the respective interests of the
parties involved, and the legislated policy of
particular regimes. She points out that the United
States’ new Uniform Computer Information
Transactions Act (UCITA), which is likely to be
adopted by many U.S. States and influence similar
legislation in many other countries, leaves this
crucial issue essentially unresolved.
Among the author’s
many startling insights is that, contrary to the
commonly held notion that the Internet is a bastion of
free speech, in fact it is now possible (via
encryption technology) for the first time in human
history to exercise absolute control over copyrighted
material, even under circumstances of global mass
distribution. As we become more and more aware that
the intersection of copyright and contract reveals one
of the deepest and most far-reaching contradictions of
our time, this illuminating analysis will be of
extraordinary value to jurists in every area of public
and private law.
Published 12.02.2002
|
| Council of
Europe, Discussion
paper on the question of Exceptions to and limitations
on copyright and neighbouring rights in the digital era,
Strasbourg, October 1998.
Published 18.02.2002
|
'Pre-emption
Issues in the Digital Environment: Can Copyright
Limitations Be Overridden by Contractual Agreements
under European Law?', in F.W. Grosheide & K.
Boele-Woelki (red.), Molengrafica nr. 11. Europees
Privaatrecht 1998. Opstellen over Internationale
Transacties en Intellectuele Eigendom, Lelystad:
Koninklijke Vermande 1998, p. 225-262.
Published 21.02.1999
|
'Limitations
found outside of copyright law', General report
prepared for the ALAI STUDY DAYS Cambridge, September
14-17, 1998: The Exceptions And Limitations To
Copyright.
Published 12.01.1999
|
Agreements
between Authors or Performers and Collective Rights
Societies: Comparative Study of Some Provisions,
Report prepared for the 1997 ALAI Congress held in
Montebello, Canada, Montreal: ALAI Canada 1997.
Text in French - with
the Introduction and a summary for each chapter
translated into English. Available in paper format
with ALAI Canada for $ 75. CDN.
In the context of the
1997 Congress of the Association Littéraire et
Artistique Internationale (ALAI), entitled 'Protection
of Authors and Performers through Contracts', the
Canadian Group of ALAI wished to draw particular
attention to the legal relationship existing between
authors or performers and collective rights societies.
The nature of the copyrights and neighbouring rights
conferred by law, the legal framework surrounding the
structure and operations of collective societies,
their number in each territory and the presence of
complementary professional associations are
determining factors in the definition of the scope of
protection granted to authors and performers. Taking
these elements into account, this report analyzes
around fifty agreements entered into by authors and
performers on the one hand, and organizations whose
activities consist of collecting and distributing
copyrights and neighbouring rights, on the other hand.
The study is divided into two main chapters, the first
one dealing with the contractual relationship between
members and the society, and the second one examining
the extent to which members may participate in the
operations of the society.
Published 01.01.2001
|
'Les
programmes d'ordinateur et le droit d'innovation
technologique', Cahiers de Propriété
Intellectuelle (9) 1997-2, p. 171-202.
Text in French. This
article discusses the legal protection of computer
software and proposes the creation of a new sui
generis right more suited to the characteristics
of this technology. The proposal of a new
technological innovation right arises from the
experience acquired over the last twenty years with
respect to computer software protection. The
parameters of this new right are inspired by copyright
law, patent law, integrated circuit topography law, as
well as the new sui generis right on databases
recognized in Europe. This article presents the
technological innovation right: the scope of its
application, the exclusive rights granted and their
limitations, the formalities for acquisition and the
duration of the protection.
Published 01.01.2001
|
|
|
Updated
28.10.2009
|
|
|
|