Chapter 1
General Provisions
Art. 1.
In this Act of the Kingdom and the Rules based on it:
"European Patent Convention" shall mean the Convention on the
Grant of European Patents signed in Munich on October 5, 1973
(Trb. 1975, 108 and 1976, 101);
"Community Patent Convention" shall mean the Convention for the
European Patent for the Common Market signed in Luxembourg on
December 15, 1989 (Trb. 1990, 121);
"European patent" shall mean a patent granted under the European
Patent Convention, insofar as it has been granted for the
Kingdom and is not a Community Patent;
"Community patent" shall mean a patent as referred to in Article
2 of the Community Patent Convention;
"European patent application" shall mean an application for a
European patent as referred to in the European Patent
Convention;
"Patent Cooperation Treaty" shall mean the Patent Cooperation
Treaty signed in Washington, D.C. on June 19, 1970 (Trb. 1973,
20);
"Office" shall mean the Industrial Property Office as referred
to in Article 4 of the Act of April 25, 1963 (Stb. 221);
"patent register" shall mean the register referred to in Article
19 of this Act;
"The Minister" shall mean the Dutch Minister of Economic
Affairs;
"natural resources" shall mean the mineral and other non-living
resources from the seabed and substratum, as well as living
organisms of the sedentary type, i.e., organisms that at the
moment they can be harvested are stationary either on or under
the seabed, or cannot move except in constant physical contact
with the seabed or substratum.
Art. 2.
1. Inventions that are new, that involve an inventive step and
that are susceptible of industrial application shall be
patentable.
2. The following inventions shall not be regarded as inventions
within the meaning of the first paragraph:
a. discoveries, as well as scientific theories and mathematical
methods;
b. aesthetic creations;
c. schemes, rules and methods for performing mental acts,
playing games or doing business, as well as computer programs;
d. presentations of information.
3. The second paragraph applies only insofar as it concerns the
subject matter or activities referred to as such.
Art. 3.
No patent shall be issued for:
a. inventions the publication or exploitation of which would be
contrary to public order or morality;
b. plant or animal varieties, or essentially biological
processes for the production of plants or animals and the
products thereof, with the exception of microbiological
processes unless these are prohibited by or pursuant to the Act
on Health and Welfare of Animals.
Art. 4.
1. An invention shall be considered to be new if it does not
form part of the state of the art.
2. The state of the art shall comprise everything made available
to the public by means of a written or oral description, by use
or in any other way before the date of filing of the
application.
3. The state of the art shall also comprise the contents of
previously filed applications that have been entered in the
patent register pursuant to Article 31 on or after the date
referred to in paragraph (2), above.
4. The state of the art shall also comprise the contents of
European patent applications and of international applications
as referred to in Article 158(1) and (2) of the European Patent
Convention, the date of filing of which, pursuant to Article
54(2) and (3) of said Convention, precedes the date referred to
in paragraph (2), above, and which have been published pursuant
to Article 93 of said Convention or Article 21 of the Patent
Cooperation Treaty on or after that date, provided that the
Kingdom has been designated in the published application.
5. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs (1) to (4),
substances or compositions included in the state of the art may
be patented when they are intended for use in one of the methods
referred to in Article 7(2) provided that said use for any
method referred to in that paragraph is not included in the
state of the art.
Art. 5.
1. For the purposes of Article 4 the disclosure of an invention
shall be disregarded if it occurred no earlier than six months
prior to the filing of the patent application as a direct or
indirect consequence of:
a. an evident abuse in relation to the applicant or his legal
predecessor, or
b. the fact that the applicant or his legal predecessor
displayed the invention at an official, or officially
recognized, international exhibition within the terms of the
Convention on International Exhibitions signed in Paris on
November 22, 1928, and last revised by the Protocol of November
30, 1972 (Trb. 1973, 100), on condition that the applicant
declares, upon filing his application, that the invention has
been so displayed and submits proof thereof within a period set
by administrative order and in accordance with provisions set by
administrative order.
2. Official recognition of exhibitions in the Netherlands shall
be accorded by the Minister. Recognition of exhibitions in the
Netherlands Antilles shall be accorded by the Government of the
Netherlands Antilles.
Art. 6.
An invention shall be deemed to be the result of inventive
activity if, having regard to the state of the art, it is not
obvious to a person skilled in the art. Documents as referred to
in Article 4(3) and (4) belonging to the state of the art shall
not be taken into consideration in assessing inventive activity.
Art. 7.
1. An invention shall be considered susceptible of industrial
application if it can be made or used in any field of industry,
including agriculture.
2. Methods for treatment of the human body or animal body
whether through surgery or medical treatment and diagnostic
methods practiced on the human or animal body shall not be
regarded as inventions that are susceptible of industrial
application within the meaning of the preceding paragraph. This
provision does not apply to products, particularly substances or
compositions, for use in any of these methods.
Art. 8.
Without prejudice to Articles 11, 12 and 13, the applicant shall
be deemed to be the inventor and in that capacity to be the
person entitled to the patent.
Art. 9.
1. A person who has duly filed an application for a patent or
for a utility certificate or for the protection of a utility
model in any of the countries members of the International Union
for the Protection of Industrial Property and in accordance with
the laws in force in that country or in accordance with treaties
concluded between two or more of the aforementioned countries,
shall enjoy a right of priority within the Netherlands and the
Netherlands Antilles during a period of 12 months from the
filing date of the application with regard to obtaining a patent
for the subject matter in respect of which the protection
referred to above has been applied for. The foregoing shall
apply mutatis mutandis to a person who has applied for an
inventor's certificate if the relevant legislation provides an
option regarding the grant of such a certificate or of a patent.
2. An application within the meaning of paragraph (1) shall be
understood to mean any application of which the date of filing
can be ascertained, regardless of the subsequent fate of the
application.
3. If the person entitled to do so has filed more than one
application for the same subject matter, only the first
application shall serve as a basis for claiming a right of
priority. Nevertheless, a subsequent application for protection
in the same country may serve as a basis for claiming a right of
priority, provided that, on the filing date of the subsequent
application, the previous application has been withdrawn,
abandoned or refused without being open to public inspection and
without leaving any rights outstanding, and provided it has not
served as a basis for claiming a right of priority. If a right
of priority based on a later application is invoked, the first
application may not thereafter serve as a basis for claiming a
right of priority.
4. For the purposes of Articles 4(2), (3) and (4) and Article 6,
the effect of the right of priority shall be that the
application for which this right exists shall be deemed to have
been filed on the date of filing of the application that confers
the right of priority.
5. The applicant may claim multiple rights of priority, even if
the rights originated in different countries. The application
for which one or more rights are claimed may also include
elements for which no rights were claimed in the claims
formulated in the application upon which his claim to right of
priority is based, provided that the documents of the latter
application refer to the product in question or the process in
question with sufficient accuracy.
6. A person wishing to avail himself of the right of priority
shall claim it in writing upon filing the application or within
three months thereafter, stating the date of filing of the
application upon which his claim is based and also the country
in which or for which it was filed; within 16 months after
filing the application upon which his claim is based, he must
submit to the Office the number of that application and a copy
of it in Dutch, French, German or English, or a translation of
the application upon which his claim to right of priority is
based in one of these languages and, if he is not the person who
filed the application serving as a basis for the priority claim,
a document establishing his rights. The Office may require that
the translation referred to in the previous sentence be
certified.
7. The right of priority shall be lost if the conditions of
paragraph (6) are not met.
Art. 10.
1. Where for a patent granted pursuant to this Act the right of
priority of a patent application filed previously pursuant to
this Act is claimed, the patent granted on said application has
no legal consequences insofar as it concerns the same invention
as the first-mentioned patent.
2. Claims to establish the absence of legal consequences as
referred to in the first paragraph may be brought by any person.
3. Article 75(4), (8), first sentence, and (9) shall apply
mutatis mutandis.
Art. 11.
The applicant shall not be entitled to a patent insofar as the
contents of his application have been obtained unlawfully from
subject matter made or applied by another person or from
descriptions, drawings or models belonging to another person
without that person's consent. The latter person shall remain
entitled to a patent to the extent that the subject matter thus
unlawfully obtained is patentable. For the purposes of Article
4(3) and (4), the application filed by the person who has so
obtained the subject matter shall not be taken into
consideration for the subject matter of an application filed by
the person from whom the aforementioned subject matter has been
so taken.
Art. 12.
1. Where the invention for which a patent application has been
filed has been made by a person employed in the service of
another person, the employee shall be entitled to the patent
unless the nature of the service entails the use of the
employee's special knowledge for the purposes of making
inventions of the same kind as that to which the patent
application relates. Should the latter be the case, the employer
shall be entitled to the patent.
2. Where the invention for which a patent application has been
filed has been made by a person who performs services for
another in the context of a training course, the person for whom
the services are performed shall be entitled to the patent
unless the invention has no connection with the subject of the
services.
3. Where the invention has been made by a person carrying out
research in the service of a university, college or research
establishment, the university, college or research establishment
shall be entitled to the patent.
4. For the purposes of Article 4(3) and (4), an application
filed by a person not having a right to a patent shall be
disregarded in respect of the subject matter of an application
filed by the employer referred to in the first paragraph, last
sentence, or by a person providing the opportunity to perform
the services referred to in the second paragraph.
5. The provisions of paragraphs (1), (2) and (3) may be departed
from by written agreement.
6. Where the inventor cannot be deemed to have been compensated,
in the salary he earns or the pecuniary allowance he receives or
in any extra remuneration he receives, for not having been
granted a patent, the person who is entitled to the patent on
the basis of paragraphs (1), (2) and (3) shall be obliged to
award him equitable remuneration related to the pecuniary
importance of the invention and the circumstances under which it
was made. Any right of the inventor to claim under this
provision shall lapse after the expiry of three years from the
date of the grant of the patent.
7. Any stipulation departing from the sixth paragraph shall be
void.
Art. 13.
Where an invention has been made by two or more persons working
together by agreement, they shall have a joint right to a
patent.
Art. 14.
1. Any person who has made an invention for which a patent
application has been filed, but who cannot claim any title to a
patent under Article 12(1), (2) or (3) or under an agreement
concluded with the applicant or his predecessors in title, shall
have a right to be mentioned as the inventor in the patent.
2. Any stipulation departing from the provisions of the
preceding paragraph shall be void.
Chapter 2
Processing of Patent Applications
Part 1 General Provisions
Art. 15.
The Office is an institution of the Netherlands. It shall serve,
with respect to patents, as the central office for the
Netherlands and the Netherlands Antilles pursuant to Article 12
of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial
Property of March 20, 1883, as revised at Stockholm on July 14,
1967 (Trb. 1969, 144).
Art. 16.
If the Office is closed on the last day of any time limit to be
observed under this Act by or vis-à-vis the Office, that time
limit shall be extended for the purposes of this Act to the end
of the first day thereafter on which the Office is open.
Art. 17.
1. The Office shall act as a receiving Office within the meaning
of Article 2(xv) of the Patent Cooperation Treaty and shall
exercise its functions in that capacity in accordance with the
provisions of said Treaty.
2. Inasmuch as the Patent Cooperation Treaty permits, the amount
and the due date of the fees that can be levied under the Patent
Cooperation Treaty and the Regulations under it shall be set by
administrative order. Furthermore, additional regulations may be
laid down by administrative order concerning the subject matter
in respect of which the receiving Office is empowered to make
provision by virtue of the aforementioned Regulations.
Art. 18.
The designation or, in appropriate cases, the election of the
Kingdom in an international application as referred to in
Article 2(vii) of the Patent Cooperation Treaty shall be deemed
to be a request by the applicant to be granted a European
patent.
Art. 19.
1. The Office shall maintain a register in which, by virtue of
this Act, particulars concerning patent applications and patents
are recorded.
2. The register shall be open for inspection by any person free
of charge.
3. Additional regulations may be set by administrative order
with respect to this register. These may provide that the
registration of given particulars is dependent upon the payment
of an amount by the individual requesting registration.
4. In return for payment of amounts to be set by administrative
order, any individual may request written information on or
certified extracts from the patent register or documents
relating to a patent application or patent registered in the
patent register, as well as copies of the latter documents.
Art. 20.
1. All particulars recorded in the patent register shall also be
reported in a Journal to be published periodically by the
Office.
2. Additional regulations may be fixed by administrative order
with respect to the provisions of the first paragraph.
Art. 21.
1. From the moment the patent application is recorded in the
patent register any person can inspect free of charge all
documents pertaining to the application or the patent granted as
a result of such application that the Office has received or has
sent to the applicant or to third parties in the context of the
provisions of this Act. As soon as possible, but not before the
application is entered in the patent register, the Office shall
give notice of these documents in the Journal referred to in
Article 20.
2. Documents pertaining to an application that has not yet been
entered in the patent register may only be inspected with the
consent of the applicant. It shall, however, be possible to
inspect such documents without the consent of the applicant if
the person in question shows that the applicant has invoked the
rights under the application against the person in question.
This provision does not pertain to the patent applications
referred to in Part 3 of this Chapter.
3. The declaration of the inventor stating that he does not wish
to be recorded as the inventor in the patent may not be
inspected.
Art. 22.
Persons entitled to act as authorized representatives before the
Patent Office may act as authorized representatives for the
applicant before the Office. The provisions of Article 18A of
the Patents Act of the Kingdom (last amended in 1987) and
provisions thereunder shall also apply to professional
representation before the Office.
Art. 23.
1. If, despite taking all due care required by the
circumstances, the applicant for or proprietor of a patent or
the proprietor of a European patent has not been able to observe
a time limit with respect to the Office or the office referred
to in Article 99, he shall, at his request, have his rights
reestablished by the Office, if failure to observe the time
limit pursuant to this Act has directly led to the loss of any
right or means of redress.
2. The first paragraph shall not apply to failure to file the
patent application within the time limit stipulated in Article
9(1) or to failure to comply with the time limit referred to in
paragraph (3), below.
3. The request shall be filed as soon as possible, but in any
case not more than a year after expiry of the time limit that
was not observed. The omitted act is to be made good together
with the request. If the applicant is not resident in the
Kingdom, he shall elect domicile with an authorized
representative. An amount to be set by administrative order is
to be paid upon filing the request.
4. The Office shall record the reestablishment in the patent
register.
5. Any person remains authorized notwithstanding the patent to
continue the acts stipulated in Article 53(1) where said person
has, in or for his business, commenced manufacture or
application of that for which as a result of the reestablishment
a patent is in force, or has commenced implementation of his
decision to do so in or for his business within the Netherlands
or the Netherlands Antilles or where a European patent is
concerned, within the Netherlands, in the period between the
loss of rights or means of redress and the reestablishment.
Article 55(2) and (3) shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Part 2 Grant of Patent
Art. 24.
1. An application for a patent must be filed with the Office in
writing and must:
a. contain the name and address of the applicant;
b. contain the name and place of residence of the inventor
unless, according to a written declaration attached to the
application, he does not wish to be recorded on the patent as
the inventor;
c. contain a request for the grant of a patent;
d. contain a concise indication of the subject matter of the
invention;
e. be accompanied by a description of the invention containing,
in one or more claims at the end, a definition of the subject
matter for which exclusive rights are being sought;
f. be accompanied by an abstract of the description.
2. The abstract is only intended to serve as a source of
technical information; it specifically may not serve for
interpreting the scope of the protection requested or for the
application of Article 4(3) or Article 75(2).
3. The application and the description of the invention should
be written in Dutch and signed by the applicant or the person
appointed as his representative by written authorization.
4. The application, the description of the invention, the
drawings and the abstract shall also meet the other formal
regulations laid down by administrative order.
5. Proof confirming that an amount equal to the rate set by
administrative order has been paid to the Office should be
submitted with the application.
Art. 25.
1. The description of the invention must be clear and complete;
the definition given in one or more claims at the end should be
precise. The description should, if necessary, be accompanied by
corresponding drawings and be of such a nature as to enable a
person skilled in the art to understand and carry out the
invention on the basis of that description.
2. If an invention involving a microbiological process or a
product made using such a process involves the use of a
microorganism that is not accessible to the public, a culture of
the organism shall also be deposited at an institution
designated by or by virtue of an administrative order no later
than the date of filing and shall comply with the requirements
stipulated by administrative order regarding the identification
and availability of the microorganism.
Art. 26.
If the applicant's place of residence is not in the Kingdom, he
shall be required to elect domicile in the Netherlands with an
authorized representative as referred to in Article 22.
Art. 27.
Each application for a patent shall relate to one invention only
or to a group of related inventions so linked as to form a
single general inventive concept. Further regulations in this
matter may be laid down by administrative order.
Art. 28.
1. The applicant may divide a previously filed application by
filing a separate application for a part of the contents. Except
for the purposes of Article 30(1), Article 31(3) and Article
32(1), this application shall be deemed to have been filed on
the date of filing of the original application.
2. The applicant may change the description, claims and drawings
of the application already filed.
3. The subject matter of the divisional or amended application
must be covered by the contents of the original application.
4. The division or amendment may be made up to the time at which
the patent application is to be entered in the patent register
in accordance with Article 31(1) or (2).
5. If the applicant has requested a search of the state of the
art pursuant to Article 32, the division or amendment may be
made up to two months after dispatch of the notice referred to
in Article 34(4) if this time limit expires after the time limit
referred to in the fourth paragraph. This time limit may be
extended once by two months by the Office at the written and
reasoned request of the applicant.
Art. 29.
1. The date of filing shall be the date on which the following
are submitted:
a. a request for the grant of a patent;
b. particulars identifying the applicant;
c. a description of the invention and one or more claims, even
if they fail to comply with the provisions of Article 24 or
provisions thereunder.
2. The Office shall record the date referred to in the first
paragraph and assign a serial number to the application and
shall notify these to the applicant as soon as possible by post
or hand delivery.
3. If the Office is of the opinion that the filed documents do
not meet the requirements of the first paragraph, then the
Office shall refuse to record the date referred to in the first
paragraph. It shall notify the applicant of its decision and the
reason for it as soon as possible by post or hand delivery.
Art. 30.
1. If the provisions of Articles 24 and 26 and provisions
thereunder are not complied with or disclosure of the invention
to the public would be contrary to public order or morality, the
Office shall notify the applicant of this in writing within one
month of the date of filing referred to in Article 29(1) or, in
the case of a divisional application, within one month of the
date on which the divisional application was filed, together
with a statement of the provisions that have not been complied
with.
2. If the shortcomings are not remedied within three months
after dispatch of the notice referred to in the first paragraph
or if the applicant makes it known before then that he does not
wish to remedy them, the Office shall decide not to process the
application. The Office shall inform the applicant of its
decision and the reasons for it by post or hand delivery as soon
as possible.
Art. 31.
1. The Office shall enter a patent application in the patent
register as soon as possible after the expiration of 18 months:
a. following the date of filing referred to in Article 29(1),
or,
b. if it concerns an application for which one or more rights of
priority have been claimed, after the first date of priority.
2. At the written request of the applicant, registration shall
take place at an earlier date.
3. A divisional application as referred to in Article 28 shall
be registered as soon as possible after its filing, although not
prior to the registration of the original application.
Art. 32.
1. Within 13 months of:
a. the date of filing referred to in Article 29(1), or,
b. if the application is one for which one or more rights of
priority have been claimed, after the first date of priority,
the applicant may request the Office to perform a search of the
state of the art with respect to the subject matter of the
patent application prior to the grant of the patent.
2. If a divisional application as provided for in Article 28 is
involved, then the request referred to in the first paragraph
may be made within 13 months of the date of filing of the
original application provided for in Article 29(1) or within two
months after the filing of the divisional application, if the
resulting date is later.
3. The request shall be filed in writing with the Office,
accompanied by proof that a payment has been made to the Office
in accordance with the rate set by administrative order. If this
proof is not submitted within the time limit stipulated in the
first paragraph then the request shall not be processed.
4. As soon as possible after the patent application has been
entered in the patent register, the Office shall record the
request referred to in the first paragraph in the patent
register.
Art. 33.
1. If the applicant has not made said request within the time
limit stipulated in Article 32(1) or has informed the Office in
writing that he will not make such a request, the Office shall
grant the patent as soon as the patent application has been
entered in the register and shall record the grant in the
register.
2. The patent shall relate only to the invention or group of
inventions referred to in Article 27 that is mentioned first in
the claims.
3. The patent shall be granted by signing and affixing the date
to the application in the form in which it was filed or amended
pursuant to Article 28 or 30(2).
4. The Office shall issue the specifications and drawings
attached to the application in the form of a patent
specification and supply a certified copy to the applicant.
5. A patent granted by virtue of this Article shall remain in
force, barring earlier lapse or invalidation by the court, until
the expiry of six years from the date of filing referred to in
Article 29(1).
Art. 34.
1. A search of the state of the art as provided for in Article
32(1) shall be conducted by the Office, if necessary with the
assistance of the European Patent Office referred to in the
European Patent Convention.
2. If the applicant so requests, the Office shall cause the
application to be subjected to an international search as
provided in Article 15(5)(a) of the Patent Cooperation Treaty.
Such a search shall be deemed to be a search of the state of the
art as referred to in Article 32(1).
3. If it is apparent from the search that the application filed
does not comply with the provisions of Article 27 and provisions
thereunder, it shall be carried out with respect to the element
of the application relating to the invention or group of
inventions referred to in Article 27 that is mentioned first in
the claims.
4. The Office shall notify the applicant in writing of the
results of the search of the state of the art.
5. If the third paragraph applies, the Office shall state this
in the notification provided for in paragraph (4), providing
reasons therefor and specifying the invention or group of
inventions regarding which the search was conducted.
Art. 35.
1. If the Office is of the opinion that the search of the state
of the art cannot be conducted owing to lack of clarity of the
claims in the application, it shall so inform the applicant in a
reasoned, written statement as soon as possible.
2. If the shortcomings are not remedied within two months of the
dispatch of the notice referred to in the first paragraph, or if
the applicant makes it known before then that he does not wish
to remedy them, the Office shall decide not to process the
application. The Office shall inform the applicant of its
decision and the reasons for it by post or hand delivery as soon
as possible.
Art. 36.
1. If the applicant has requested a search of the state of the
art as provided in Article 32(1), the Office shall grant the
patent as soon as the patent application has been entered in the
register, but not earlier than two months or -- if Article
28(5), second sentence, applies -- four months after the
dispatch of the notification referred to in Article 34(4). It
shall record this in the patent register.
2. Article 33(3) and (4) shall apply.
3. If Article 34(3) applies, the patent shall relate only to
that invention or group of inventions referred to in Article 27
that is mentioned first in the claims.
4. The report on the search of the state of the art shall be
attached to the patent specification.
5. A patent granted by virtue of this Article shall remain in
force, barring earlier lapse or invalidation by the court, until
the expiry of 20 years from the date of filing provided for in
Article 29(1).
Art. 37.
1. Any person may at any time request the Office in writing to
conduct a search of the state of the art in respect of the
subject matter of a patent granted by the Office.
2. If the person making the request precisely states in the
request to which specific part of the patent the request for a
search applies, the search shall be conducted in accordance with
the request.
3. The request should be accompanied by proof that payment has
been made to the Office in accordance with the rate set by
administrative order. If this proof is not submitted, the
request shall not be processed.
4. The Office shall immediately notify the applicant of a
request as referred to in the first paragraph and record the
submission of the request as soon as possible in the register.
5. Article 34(1), (3), (4) and (5) and Article 35(1) shall apply
mutatis mutandis.
Art. 38.
1. Anyone may provide the Office with information on a patent
application or the patent granted on it in a written statement.
The Office shall then pass this information on to the applicant
or the patent proprietor if it did not originate with said
person in the first place.
2. If the identification of the inventor as referred to in
Article 24(1)(b) is incorrect, or if a person other than the
inventor declares that the inventor does not wish to be
identified as such in the patent, then the applicant and
inventor may jointly request the Office in writing to make the
necessary corrections to the patent against payment of an amount
to be set by administrative order. If applicable, the request
must be accompanied by the written consent of the person wrongly
designated as the inventor.
Art. 39.
1. The withdrawal of a patent application entered in the patent
register shall have no consequences for third parties as long as
no legal claims have been finally and irrevocably decided in any
legal proceedings that have been instituted concerning the
application according to documents registered in the patent
register.
2. Where a person other than the applicant is entitled to the
patent or has a joint right to the patent by virtue of an
irrevocable judgment in legal proceedings as referred to in
paragraph (1), the withdrawal shall be deemed not to have
occurred.
3. The Office shall record the withdrawal in the patent
register.
Part 3 Maintenance of Secrecy of the
Contents of Patent Applications
Art. 40.
1. If the Office is of the opinion that the secrecy of the
contents of a patent application may be in the interest of the
defense of the Kingdom or its allies, it shall notify the
applicant thereof as soon as possible, but no later than three
months from the date of filing of the application. The Minister
of Defense may give directions to the Office on whether or not
there is such an interest.
2. At the same time as the notification is sent, the Office
shall send a copy thereof and of the description and drawings
pertaining to the application to the aforementioned Minister.
3. Where paragraph (1) applies, the entry of the application in
the patent register shall be suspended.
Art. 41.
1. Within eight months of the filing of a patent application as
referred to in Article 40, the Minister of Defense shall notify
the Office whether the contents of the application are to be
kept secret in the interest of the defense of the Kingdom or its
allies.
2. Notification in the affirmative under paragraph (1) shall
have the effect of suspending the entry of the application in
the patent register for a period of three years from the date of
notification of said decision. Notification in the negative
shall terminate such suspension. The absence of any notification
shall be treated as a notification in the negative.
3. The aforementioned Minister may extend the term of suspension
within six months preceding its expiry for periods of three
years at a time by notifying the Office that the contents of the
application are to be kept secret in the interest of the defence
of the Kingdom or its allies.
4. The aforementioned Minister may at any time notify the Office
that the contents of the application need no longer be kept
secret. Such a notification shall terminate the suspension.
5. The Office shall inform the applicant without delay of any
notification under paragraph (1), (3) or (4). The Office shall
also inform the applicant without delay of the absence of any
notification as referred to in paragraph (1) or (3).
6. For as long as the suspension has not been terminated the
Office shall send the aforementioned Minister, at his request,
copies of all the relevant documents exchanged between the
Office and the applicant.
7. If the suspension ends, the application shall nevertheless
not be entered in the patent register until a period of three
months has elapsed, unless the applicant requests otherwise.
Art. 42.
1. Any person whose patent application has become subject to
Articles 40, 41 or 46 shall, at his request, be awarded
compensation by the State for any damage he has sustained
through the enforcement of these Articles.
2. The amount of the compensation shall be determined on the
termination of the suspension. If, however, the term of
suspension has been extended by virtue of Article 41(3), the
amount of the compensation shall be determined, at the request
of the applicant, in installments, the first relating to the
period prior to the commencement of the first extension, the
next to the period between two successive extensions and the
last to the period from the commencement of the last extension
to the termination of the suspension; the amounts shall be
determined upon expiration of the relevant periods.
3. The amount of the compensation shall be determined, if
possible, by mutual consent between the Minister of Defense and
the applicant. If no agreement has been reached within six
months from the date of the expiry of the period to which the
compensation relates, Article 58(6), first sentence, shall apply
mutatis mutandis.
Art. 43.
1. If an applicant requests that the contents of a patent
application be kept secret in the interest of the defense of
some other State, or if the government of that State makes such
a request, the Office shall, provided the applicant has stated
in writing that he renounces any compensation for damages he
might sustain by reason of the enforcement of this Article, send
without delay a copy of that request and of the specification
and drawings pertaining to the application as well as the
aforementioned statement of renunciation to the Minister of
Defense. In such a case, the entry of the application in the
patent register shall be suspended. In the absence of a
statement of renunciation, the Office shall notify the
aforementioned Minister thereof without delay.
2. Within three months following the date of filing of the
request, the aforementioned Minister may notify the Office that
the contents of the application are to be kept secret in the
interest of the defense of the State concerned, provided that he
has ascertained that secrecy has been imposed on the applicant
by that State and that the applicant was given permission by the
same State to file an application the subject matter of which
has been made secret.
3. A notification by virtue of paragraph (2) shall result in the
entry of the application in the patent register being suspended
until the aforementioned Minister notifies the Office that the
contents of the application need no longer be kept secret.
Absence of the aforesaid notification shall end the suspension.
4. Article 41(6) and (7) shall apply mutatis mutandis with
regard to an application as referred to in paragraph (1).
Art. 44.
1. Where the Minister of Defense is of the opinion that it is in
the interest of the defense of the Kingdom for the State to use,
put into practice or cause to be used or to be put into practice
the subject matter of a patent application to which Article 40,
41 or 43 has been applied, he may take measures to that effect
after notifying the applicant thereof. The notification shall
contain a precise account of the acts that the State must
perform or cause to be performed.
2. The State shall compensate the applicant for the use or the
putting into practice of the subject matter of the application
pursuant to paragraph (1).
3. The amount of this compensation shall be fixed, if possible,
by mutual consent between the aforementioned Minister and the
applicant. If no agreement has been reached within six months
following the date of the notification referred to in paragraph
(1), Article 58(6), first sentence, shall apply mutatis
mutandis.
Art. 45.
If the State itself is the owner of a patent application and if
the Minister of Defense notifies the Office that its contents
are to be kept secret in the interest of the defense of the
Kingdom or its allies, the entry of the application in the
patent register shall be suspended until the aforementioned
Minister notifies the Office that the contents of the
application need no longer be kept secret.
Art. 46.
1. A European patent application whose applicant knows or should
reasonably know that the contents thereof should be kept secret
in the interests of the defense of the Kingdom or its allies
shall be filed with the Office.
2. The Office shall without delay send a copy of the
specification and drawings pertaining to the application to the
Minister of Defense.
3. Within a period not exceeding three weeks before expiration
of the time limit referred to in Article 77(3) of the European
Patent Convention, the Minister of Defense shall notify the
Office whether the contents of the application shall be subject
to secrecy in the interest of the defense of the Kingdom or its
allies.
4. If notification under paragraph (3) has been effected in the
negative or if no notification has been effected at all, the
Office shall forward the European patent application to the
European Patent Office referred to in the European Patent
Convention with due observance of the time limit referred to in
Article 77(3) of said Convention.
5. The Office shall inform the applicant without delay of any
notification by virtue of paragraph (3) or of the absence
thereof.
Part 4 Conversion of European Patent
Applications
Art. 47.
A European patent application which complies with the provisions
of Article 80 of the European Patent Convention and is deemed to
have been withdrawn under Article 77(5) of said Convention and
which has been filed at the Office as an annex to a regular
request for conversion to a patent application in the Kingdom,
hereinafter referred to as a converted application, shall be
deemed to be a patent application as referred to in Article 24,
directed to the Office and filed at the Office. A request for
conversion shall be regular if it has been filed, and has been
transferred to the Office, in due time with due observance of
the provisions of Part VIII, Chapter I, of the European Patent
Convention.
Art. 48.
1. The date of delivery to the Office, together with a serial
number, shall be noted on the converted application. The Office
shall inform the applicant of this as soon as possible.
2. Proof of payment for the converted application as specified
in Article 24(5) shall be furnished within a period of three
months from the date of filing referred to in paragraph (1). If
the European patent application has not been filed in Dutch, a
translation into Dutch of the original documents of that
application shall be filed within the same period. The
translation shall form part of the converted application; it
shall be certified at the request of the Office within a time
limit to be stipulated by the Office. If the provisions of this
paragraph have not been complied with in due time, the Office
shall give the applicant one opportunity to remedy this
deficiency within a period to be stipulated by the Office. If
the applicant does not remedy the deficiency within this time
limit, the Office shall decide not to process the application.
The Office shall notify the applicant of this decision and the
reasons for it by post or hand delivery as soon as possible.
3. The formal requirements imposed by or by virtue of Articles
24 and 26 shall not apply to the converted application if and to
the extent that they differ from or are supplementary to the
provisions of the European Patent Convention or provisions
thereunder; in such cases the latter provisions shall apply to
the converted application.
4. As soon as the applicant has complied with the provisions of
paragraph (2), the Office shall determine whether the
application satisfies the provisions of Articles 24 and 26 or
provisions thereunder or, if applicable, the provisions of the
European Patent Convention as referred to in paragraph (3). If
this is not the case, or if making the invention public is
contrary to public order or morality, the Office shall so inform
the applicant in writing as soon as possible, stating the
requirements that have not been complied with. Article 30(2)
shall apply mutatis mutandis.
5. For the application of Articles 31(1), 32(1), 33(5), 36(5)
and 61(1) to the converted patent application, "the date of
filing referred to in Article 29(1)," should read: the date of
filing of the application pursuant to Article 80 of the European
Patent Convention in consideration of Articles 61 or 76 of that
Convention.
6. The entry in the patent register referred to in Article 31
shall not be made until it has been ascertained that the
requirements of paragraph (4) have been satisfied or that
deficiencies in this respect have been remedied.
Chapter 3
Provisions Governing European Patents and Community Patents
Art. 49.
1. In conformity with the provisions of this Act, European
patents shall have the same effect in the Netherlands and shall
be governed by the same legal provisions and have the same legal
consequences as patents granted under Article 36 of this Act
from the date on which the mention of the grant is published in
accordance with Article 97(4) of the European Patent Convention.
Community patents in the Netherlands shall from that date be
governed by the same legal provisions and have the same legal
consequences as patents granted under Article 36 of this Act
only insofar as that follows from the Community Patent
Convention.
2. Barring earlier lapse or invalidation by the court, a
European patent shall remain in force for a period of 20 years
from the date of filing of the European patent application that
led to the European patent concerned pursuant to Article 80 of
the European Patent Convention, in accordance with Articles 61
or 76 of that Convention.
3. Where the provisions of Articles 55(1), 57(4) and 77(1)
govern European patents, the date of filing shall be deemed to
be the date of filing of the European patent application which
resulted in the grant of the European patent pursuant to Article
80 of the European Patent Convention, in accordance with
Articles 61 or 76 of that Convention.
Art. 50.
1. A European patent shall be deemed, entirely or partly, not to
have had the legal consequences referred to in Articles 53, 72
and 73 from the outset insofar as the patent is entirely or
partly revoked during opposition proceedings.
2. The retroactive force of the revocation shall not affect:
a. a decision, which is not a temporary order, relating to acts
that conflict with the exclusive rights of the patent
proprietor, referred to in Article 53, or acts as referred to in
Articles 72 and 73 which had become res judicata and had been
enforced before the revocation;
b. an agreement concluded prior to the revocation, insofar as it
was also implemented prior to the revocation; however, in the
interest of equity repayment can be demanded in respect of
payments made on the basis of this agreement to the extent
justified by the circumstances.
3. For the application of paragraph (2)(b), the conclusion of an
agreement shall be deemed to include the creation of a license
in another manner provided for in Articles 56(2), 59 or 60.
Art. 51.
1. The Office shall without delay enter in the patent register
the publication, pursuant to Article 97(4) of the European
Patent Convention, of the mention of the grant of a European
patent.
2. The Office shall without delay enter in the patent register
any notice of opposition to a European patent, stating the date
of filing of the opposition and the decisions of the European
Patent Office relating thereto.
Art. 52.
1. Within a time limit to be set by administrative order, any
person to whom a European patent has been granted shall provide
the Office with a translation into Dutch of the text in which
the European Patent Office proposes the patent be granted.
Furthermore, a fee shall be due, the amount thereof and the time
limit within which it is to be paid being set by administrative
order. The translation must be certified by a professional
representative. The translation and the certification thereof
must satisfy formal requirements to be set by administrative
order.
2. If on receipt within the time limit referred to in paragraph
(1) the formal requirements referred to in the last sentence of
said paragraph have not been satisfied, the Office shall so
notify the proprietor of the patent without delay, with a
statement of the requirements that have not been satisfied and
of the time limit within which the noted deficiencies may be
remedied.
3. On receipt of the translation in the proper form, the Office
shall without delay enter it in the patent register.
4. The European patent shall be deemed not to have had the legal
consequences referred to in Article 49 from the outset if:
a. within the time limit referred to in paragraph (1), the
translation has not been received by the Office or the fee due
by virtue of that paragraph has not been paid; or
b. within the time limit referred to in paragraph (2), the
stipulated requirements have not yet been satisfied.
5. In the event of a situation provided for in paragraph (4)
arising, the Office shall without delay record the fact in the
patent register.
6. Paragraphs (1) to (5) shall apply mutatis mutandis if the
European patent has been amended during opposition proceedings.
7. The proprietor of the patent may at any time provide the
Office with a corrected translation, for which a fee shall be
due in an amount to be set by administrative order. Paragraph
(1), third and fourth sentences, and paragraphs (2) and (3)
shall apply.
8. From the moment the entry referred to in Article 51(1) is
made in the patent register, all documents pertaining to the
European patent received by the Office or sent to the proprietor
of the European patent or given to third parties within the
context of the provisions of this Act shall be open to public
inspection free of charge. The Office shall publish a mention of
all these documents in the Journal referred to in Article 20 as
soon as possible, but not before the time referred to in the
first sentence.
Chapter 4 Legal
Effects of the Patent
Part 1 Rights and Obligations of the
Patent Proprietor
Art. 53.
1. Subject to the provisions of Articles 54 to 60, a patent
shall confer on its owner the exclusive right:
a. to make, use, put on the market or resell, hire out or
deliver the patented product, or otherwise deal in it in or for
his business, or to offer, import or stock it for any of those
purposes;
b. to use the patented process in or for his business or to use,
put on the market, or resell, hire out or deliver the product
obtained directly as a result of the use of the patented
process, or otherwise deal in it in or for his business, or to
offer, import or stock it for any of those purposes, with the
exception of any product excluded from the grant of a patent
pursuant to Article 3.
2. The exclusive right shall be determined by the contents of
the claims in the patent specification, and the description and
the drawings shall serve to interpret those claims.
3. The exclusive right shall not extend to acts solely serving
for research on the patented subject matter, including the
product obtained directly as a result of using the patented
process. The exclusive right shall likewise not extend to the
preparation of medicines in pharmacies for immediate use in
individual cases on medical prescription, or to acts related to
medicines prepared in this manner.
4. If a product as referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b) has
been put on the market lawfully in the Netherlands or the
Netherlands Antilles, or, where a European patent is concerned,
in the Netherlands, or if it is put on the market lawfully in
one of the Member States of the European Union or in another
State that is party to the Agreement concerning the European
Economic Area by the patent proprietor or with his consent, the
person who obtains or later holds the product shall not
contravene the patent by using, selling, hiring out or
delivering the product or by otherwise dealing in it in or for
his business, or by offering, importing, or stocking the product
for any of those purposes.
5. A product as specified in paragraph (1)(a) or (b) which was
manufactured by a business prior to the grant of a patent or,
where a European patent is concerned, prior to the date of
publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent
in accordance with Article 97(4) of the European Patent
Convention, may continue to be used on behalf of that business
notwithstanding the patent.
Art. 54.
The exclusive right of the patent owner shall not extend to:
a. the use, on board vessels of other countries, of the subject
matter of the patent in the body of the vessel or in the
machinery, rigging, tackle and other accessories thereof when
such vessels are in the waters of the Netherlands or Netherlands
Antilles temporarily or accidentally, provided that the use is
for the actual needs of the vessel only;
b. the use of the subject matter of the patent in the
construction or operation of aircraft or land vehicles or of the
accessories of such aircraft or land vehicles belonging to other
countries, when such aircraft or land vehicles are in the
Netherlands or Netherlands Antilles temporarily or accidentally;
c. acts specified in Article 27 of the Chicago Convention on
International Civil Aviation of December 7, 1944 (Stb. 1947, H
165), provided that those acts relate to aircraft of a State
other than the Kingdom or Aruba -- mentioned under (c) in that
Article.
Art. 55.
1. Any person who, in the Netherlands or Netherlands Antilles
or, in the case of a European patent, in the Netherlands, has
already manufactured or applied or commenced implementation of
his intention to manufacture or apply, in or for his business,
the subject matter of a patent application filed by another on
the filing date thereof or, if the applicant has a right of
priority under Article 9(1) or Article 87 of the European Patent
Convention, on the filing date of the priority application,
shall, notwithstanding the patent, continue to have the right to
perform the acts referred to in Article 53(1), this right being
based on prior use, unless his knowledge was obtained from
matter already made or applied by the applicant or from the
applicant's descriptions, drawings or models.
2. Paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to that part of
the continental shelf contiguous to the Netherlands or
Netherlands Antilles -- or, in the case of a European patent,
contiguous to the Netherlands -- in which the Kingdom has
sovereign rights, but exclusively to the extent that such acts
are associated with and performed during the exploration for or
recovery of natural resources.
3. The right referred to in paragraph (1) may only be assigned
to other persons with said business.
4. For the application of this Article to Community patents
pursuant to Article 37 of the Community Patent Convention, "a
European patent" should read: a Community patent.
Art. 56.
1. The right to perform acts prohibited to any person other than
the proprietor of the patent by virtue of Article 53 may be
acquired from the patent proprietor by means of a license. That
right shall extend to all acts referred to in the aforementioned
Article and shall remain in force as long as the patent has
effect, except where a less extensive right has been granted
under the license.
2. A license shall be created by an agreement, by an accepted
testamentary disposition or, in accordance with Articles 57 and
58, by a decision taken by the Minister or by a court decision
that has become res judicata. A license created by an agreement
or an accepted testamentary disposition shall have effect
vis-à-vis third parties after the ownership thereof has been
entered in the patent register. For this entry a fee, to be set
by administrative order, shall be due.
3. Where the right to remuneration in respect of a license
passes to another under Article 75(8) or Article 78(4), the
successor in title shall be entitled to a part of the total
remuneration paid or to be paid for the license in proportion to
the period during which the license should continue to have
effect under normal circumstances. If the amount still to be
paid by the licensee is insufficient to provide the successor in
title with that which he is due, the latter may seek redress for
the shortfall from his predecessor.
Art. 57.
1. The Minister may, if he considers it in the public interest,
grant a license under a patent, the contents of which shall be
described precisely by him, to a person designated by him.
Before giving his decision the Minister shall, unless this is
incompatible with the urgency of the matter, ascertain whether
the proprietor of the patent is willing to grant the license
voluntarily and on reasonable terms. To this end, he shall give
the patent proprietor an opportunity to express his sentiments
on the matter in writing and, at his request, also orally. The
decision shall be accompanied by a statement of reason and shall
be posted or hand-delivered to the proprietor of the patent and
the licensee. In his decision, the Minister may impose upon the
licensee the obligation to provide security within a certain
time limit. The lodging of an appeal as referred to in Article
81 shall have staying effect, unless the decision of the
Minister provides otherwise in view of the urgency of the
matter.
2. If, after three years have elapsed since the grant of the
patent, neither the proprietor of the patent nor any other
person who has been granted a license operates an industrial
establishment in the Kingdom or in another State to be
designated by administrative order in which the product
concerned is being made or where the process concerned is being
applied in good faith and on a sufficient scale, the patent
proprietor shall be obliged to grant the license needed for
operating such an establishment unless valid reasons are shown
to exist for the absence of such an establishment. This
obligation shall be effective against the proprietor of a
European patent if, after three years have elapsed since the
date on which the mention of the grant of the European patent
was published in accordance with Article 97(4) of the European
Patent Convention, an industrial establishment as referred to
above is not in operation in the Netherlands or in another State
to be designated by administrative order.
3. Paragraph (2) shall not apply if the patent proprietor or any
other person who has been granted a license has an industrial
establishment in operation in that part of the continental shelf
contiguous to the Netherlands or Netherlands Antilles, or, where
a European patent is concerned, contiguous to the Netherlands in
which the Kingdom has sovereign rights, in which those acts
referred to in that paragraph are performed in good faith and on
a sufficient scale, provided that such acts are associated with
and performed during the exploration for or recovery of natural
resources.
4. The patent proprietor shall be obliged at any time to grant a
license required for the working of a patent granted in respect
of an application which has the same or a later date of filing
or, where a right of priority exists for the application, the
same or later priority date, insofar as the patent for which the
license is requested represents a considerable advance; the
patent proprietor shall, however, only be obliged to grant a
license required for the working of a European patent after the
time limit for filing an opposition to the European patent has
expired or after opposition proceedings thus instituted have
been terminated. Such a license shall not extend further than is
necessary for the application of the patented invention of the
licensee. The latter shall be obliged to grant a reciprocal
license under his patent to the proprietor of the other patent.
Art. 58.
1. If the license referred to in Article 57(2) or (4) is
unjustifiably withheld, the license shall be granted by the
court on a claim by the interested party. At the request of the
claimant, the Office shall enter the writ in the patent
register.
2. If a patent is granted on the basis of this Act, the
claimant's claim shall not be admitted if he does not append to
his statement of claim the results of a report by the Office or
the European Patent Office as referred to in the European Patent
Convention concerning the state of the art with regard to the
subject matter of the patent for which the license was claimed.
3. The grant of a license claimed pursuant to Article 57(4),
first sentence, may be suspended with or without a time limit
if, within two months after service of the writ in which the
license is claimed, a claim for the invalidation of the patent
for which the license is claimed has been submitted.
4. In the specification of the license granted the court may
derogate from the licensee's claims and can also require that
the licensee provide security within a certain period. A license
granted pursuant to Article 57(2) shall not be exclusive and
shall not be transferable, even by sublicensing, otherwise than
together with the part of the company in which the license is
being worked. A license granted pursuant to Article 57(4), first
or third sentence, shall not expire because the patent on which
the license is granted has lapsed on expiry of the period
referred to in Article 33(5) or Article 36(5) or has been
successfully claimed, but shall expire where the patent is
partially or entirely invalidated as a result of the claim
referred to in the third paragraph.
5. A decision as referred to in Article 57(1) or a court
decision having become res judicata shall be entered in the
patent register by the Office. If security is to be provided,
the entry shall not be made before that requirement has been
met. A fee, the amount of which shall be determined by
administrative order, shall be due for the entry. The license
shall only come into effect after the entry, but shall
subsequently also have effect with regard to persons who became
entitled to the patent after the entry in the register of the
writ referred to in paragraph (1). A registered license granted
on the basis of Article 57(4) shall have retroactive effect to
the date on which the writ was entered.
6. On a claim by the most diligent party, in the absence of
agreement, the court shall fix the remuneration that the
licensee has to pay to the patent proprietor. The court may also
require the licensee to provide security within a certain
period, or confirm or change the security fixed by virtue of
Article 57(1) or paragraph (5) of this Article.
7. For the application of Article 57 and this Article to
Community patents pursuant to Articles 45 to 47 of the Community
Patent Convention, "a European patent" should read: a Community
patent; in the fourth paragraph of this Article, "the period
referred to in Article 33(5) or Article 36(5)" should read: the
period referred to in Article 63 of the European Patent
Convention.
Art. 59.
1. In the interest of the defense of the Kingdom, and on a joint
recommendation from the Minister directly concerned and the
Minister, it may be provided by Royal Decree that the State
shall be authorized to perform or cause others to perform acts,
to be described precisely in the Decree, which the proprietor of
a patent to be specified in said Decree has the exclusive right
to perform, or cause others to perform, pursuant to Article 53.
The authorization shall apply throughout the lifetime of the
patent unless a shorter term has been specified in the Decree.
2. Upon the entry into force of the Royal Decree, the Minister
directly concerned shall determine, by agreement with the
proprietor of the patent, the remuneration payable to the latter
by the State. If the Minister directly concerned has not reached
an agreement with the patent proprietor within six months from
the date of the entry into force of said Decree, Article 58(6),
with the exception of the provisions concerning the deposit of
security, shall apply mutatis mutandis.
3. In applying this Article to Community patents pursuant to
Article 45 of the Community Patent Convention, in the first
paragraph "acts ... which the proprietor of a patent to be
specified in said Decree has the exclusive right to perform
pursuant to Article 53" should read: acts ... which the
proprietor of a patent to be specified by Royal Decree may
prohibit third parties from performing pursuant to Article 25 of
the Community Patent Convention.
Art. 60.
1. Without prejudice to Article 56(2), first sentence, a license
may be created by:
a. a decision of the Arbitration Committee referred to in
Article 20 of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy
Community (EURATOM) (Trb. 1957, 92);
b. a decision of the Minister pursuant to Article 21 of the
aforementioned Treaty.
2. With respect to a license obtained by a final decision as
specified in paragraph (1)(a), Article 56(2), second and third
sentences, shall apply mutatis mutandis.
3. With respect to a decision as referred to in paragraph
(1)(b), Article 58(1) and (4) and (5), first, second and third
sentences, shall apply mutatis mutandis. With respect to a
license granted by virtue of such a decision, Article 58(5),
fourth sentence, and (6) shall apply mutatis mutandis.
4. A license as referred to in paragraph (1) shall not be
effective in the Netherlands Antilles.
Part 2 Annual Fee and Expiry of Patent
Art. 61.
1. In order to maintain the patent, an amount to be specified by
administrative order must be paid every year to the Office,
starting in the fifth year after the date referred to in Article
29(1), on the last day of the month in which the application
resulting in the grant of a patent was filed or is deemed to
have been filed pursuant to Article 28(1).
2. With regard to maintenance of a European patent, an annual
fee as mentioned in paragraph (1) must be paid to the Office,
starting after the year referred to in Article 86(4) of the
European Patent Convention has ended, on the last day of the
month in which the filing date, under Article 80 of the European
Patent Convention, of the European patent application that
resulted in the grant of the patent fell in accordance with
Article 61 or 76 of that Convention. If the fee falls due for
the first time within a period of two months from the date of
publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent
in accordance with Article 97(4) of the European Patent
Convention, the fee may be paid on the last day of the month in
which this period expires.
3. For payments after the due date an additional fee shall be
due, the amount of which shall be set by administrative order.
Art. 62.
A patent shall expire, as of right, when the amounts referred to
in Article 61 are not paid within six calendar months of the due
date mentioned in said Article. Any such expiry shall be
recorded in the patent register of the Office.
Art. 63.
1. A patent shall expire, wholly or in part, if the patent
proprietor surrenders it wholly or in part.
2. Surrender shall occur by the registration of a deed to this
effect in the patent register. The Office shall not register the
deed as long as there are persons who, by virtue of documents
entered in the patent register, have registered rights in the
patent or have received licenses or have commenced legal
proceedings concerning the patent, and these persons have not
consented to the surrender.
Part 3 The Patent as an Object of
Property
Art. 64.
1. The patent and the right to obtain a patent shall be
assignable or otherwise transferable in full or joint ownership.
2. The assignment and other transfer of the patent or of the
right arising from the patent application may be the subject of
an entry in the patent register. A fee to be set by
administrative order shall be due for such an entry.
Art. 65.
1. The submission required for the assignment of the patent or
the rights arising from a patent application shall be effected
by means of a deed containing a declaration by the proprietor of
the patent that he assigns the patent or the rights arising from
the patent application to the assignee and a declaration of the
assignee that he accepts the assignment.
2. Any reservation relating to the assignment must be specified
in the deed; in the absence of any such reservation, the
assignment shall be deemed to be unrestricted.
3. The assignment shall take effect vis-à-vis third parties only
after an entry has been made concerning the deed in the patent
register. Both parties shall be equally entitled to have the
entry made in the register.
4. Article 88 of Book 3 of the Civil Code of the Netherlands
shall apply.
Art. 66.
1. Where several persons are jointly entitled to the patent,
their mutual relationship shall be governed by a mutual
agreement between them.
2. Where there is no agreement or where the agreement does not
provide otherwise, any person entitled to the patent shall have
the right to perform the acts referred to in Article 53 and to
take action in accordance with Articles 70 to 73 against any
such act, as well as against acts referred to in Article 73(1)
and (2) performed by a non-entitled person, but a license or
consent as referred to in Article 73(2) may only be granted with
the common consent of the persons entitled to the patent.
3. With regard to the payment of the fee referred to in Article
61, the persons entitled to the patent shall be severally
liable.
Art. 67.
1. A pledge (see Art. 3:227 of the Civil Code of the
Netherlands) on a patent shall be established by a deed and
shall be effective against third parties only when entered in
the patent register.
2. The pledgee shall be required, by means of a declaration
bearing his signature to be sent to the Office for registration,
to elect domicile in The Hague. If domicile has not been elected
in this way, the Office shall be deemed to be the elected
domicile.
3. Stipulations in the deed of pledge concerning the licenses to
be granted after registration shall take effect, also vis-à-vis
third parties, from their date of entry in the patent register.
Stipulations concerning remuneration for licenses granted prior
to registration shall take effect vis-à-vis the licensee after
he has been served with a writ.
4. An entry of deeds from which it appears that the right of
pledge has ceased to exist or has ceased to have effect shall be
made in the patent register.
Art. 68.
1. In the case of attachment of a patent, the writ of attachment
shall be entered in the patent register and the provisions of
the Code of Civil Procedure of the Netherlands concerning
executory and conservatory attachment of real property shall
apply mutatis mutandis, subject to the condition that in the
writ of attachment a description of the patent shall be included
instead of the nature and location of the real property.
2. Alienation, encumbrance, the placing under management or the
granting of a license taking effect after registration of the
writ of attachment may not be invoked against the attaching
creditor.
3. License fees not paid prior to the entry of the writ of
attachment shall be included, as of right, in the attachment of
the patent after the licensee has been served with notice of the
registered attachment. These fees must be paid to the notary on
whose behalf the writ is served, provided that the licensee has
been expressly notified hereof when being served with notice and
subject to the rights of third parties which the notary must
honor. Any money paid to the notary falls under the proceeds as
referred to in Article 69(2). Articles 475i, 476 and 478 of the
Code of Civil Procedure of the Netherlands shall apply mutatis
mutandis.
4. The registration of the writ of attachment may be cancelled:
a. pursuant to a written declaration offered for registration by
the bailiff that he is discontinuing the attachment on the
instructions of the attaching creditor, or that the attachment
has expired;
b. pursuant to a court decision offered for registration lifting
the attachment or which establishes or involves the expiry of
the attachment.
5. Articles 504a, 507a, 538 to 540, 726(2) and 727 of the Code
of Civil Procedure of the Netherlands shall apply mutatis
mutandis to the attachment of a patent.
Art. 69.
1. The sale of a patent by a pledgee or attaching creditor for
the purposes of recovering a claim shall take place in public
before a qualified notary. Articles 508, 509, 513(1), 514(2) and
(3), 515 to 519 and 521 to 529 of the Code of Civil Procedure of
the Netherlands apply mutatis mutandis, with the proviso that
their provisions concerning mortgages and mortgagees apply to
the pledges on the patent and the pledgees.
2. Articles 551 to 552 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the
Netherlands shall apply mutatis mutandis to the distribution of
the proceeds.
Part 4 Enforcement of the Patent
Art. 70.
1. The proprietor of a patent may enforce his patent vis-à-vis
any person who, without being entitled to do so, performs any of
the acts referred to in Article 53(1).
2. The claim of the proprietor of a patent granted on the basis
of this Act shall not be admissible in the proprietor's legal
action if he does not submit the search report on the state of
the art with regard to the subject matter of the patent as drawn
up by the Office or by the European Patent Office as mentioned
in the European Patent Convention as an appendix to the
statement of claim and at the hearing of summary proceedings.
3. Damages may be claimed only from a person who performs such
acts in the knowledge that he has no right to do so. In any
event, a person shall be deemed to have such knowledge if the
infringement is committed after the expiry of 30 days following
the service of a writ stating that the patent is violated by the
acts performed.
4. Besides a claim for damages, the proprietor of a patent may
seek to have the defendant ordered to surrender any profits
derived from the infringement and to give an accounting of such
profits; if the court determines, however, that the
circumstances of the case do not justify such an order, it may
order the defendant to pay damages.
5. The proprietor of a patent may institute claims for damages
or for the surrender of profits on behalf of himself and
licensees or pledgees, or on behalf of licensees or pledgees
only, without prejudice to the right of the latter parties to
intervene in the claim brought by the proprietor of the patent,
whether or not brought exclusively or also on their behalf, in
order to obtain direct compensation for their damages or in
order to be awarded a proportional share of the profits to be
surrendered by the defendant. Independent claims may only be
brought by licensees and pledgees, and writs as referred to in
paragraph (3) may only be caused to be served with a view to
such actions if they have been authorized by the proprietor of
the patent.
6. Where proceedings are brought for the enforcement of a patent
relating to a process for the manufacture of a new product, it
shall be assumed that the product in question has been
manufactured using the patented process unless the defendant can
establish the plausibility of the contrary. In the evaluation of
whether or not a product is new, the terms of Article 4(3) and
(4) shall not be taken into consideration.
Art. 71.
1. Subject to the provisions of paragraph (4), the proprietor of
a patent may demand reasonable compensation from a person who,
in the period between the registration of the application
leading to the patent and the grant of the patent on that
application or a divisional application pursuant to Article 28,
has performed acts as referred to in Article 53(1), insofar as
the patent proprietor has been granted exclusive rights for
these acts.
2. Subject to the provisions of paragraph (4), the proprietor of
a patent may also demand reasonable compensation from any person
who, after the grant of the patent as referred to in paragraph
(1), has performed the acts referred to in that paragraph with
regard to products that were put on the market during the period
stipulated in that paragraph. The proprietor of the patent may
demand similar compensation from any person who, after the grant
of the patent, has used for the purposes of his business
products as specified in Article 53(1)(a) or (b) that were
manufactured in his business in the period referred to in
paragraph (1).
3. The compensation referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2) shall
only be due for acts performed after the expiry of 30 days
following the date on which the party concerned was informed, by
means of a writ indicating precisely which part of the patent
application relates to such acts, of the rights that belong to
the proprietor of the patent by virtue of this Article.
4. The rights that belong to the proprietor of a patent by
virtue of this Article shall not extend to acts performed by a
person entitled to do so by virtue of Article 55 or by
agreement, nor shall it extend to acts with regard to products
that were put on the market either prior to the registration of
the patent application in question or thereafter by the
applicant or a person entitled to do so as specified above.
Art. 72.
1. The proprietor of a European patent may, subject to the
provisions of paragraph (4), demand reasonable compensation from
any person who, in the period between the publication pursuant
to Article 93 of the European Patent Convention of the
application which has resulted in the grant of the patent and
the publication, referred to in Article 97(4) of that
Convention, of the mention of the grant of the European patent
in respect of said application or in respect of a divisional
application related thereto by virtue of Article 76 of said
Convention, has performed acts as specified in Article 53(1)
insofar as the proprietor of the patent has acquired the
exclusive right thereto and such acts are within the scope of
the last filed and published claims.
2. Subject to the provisions of paragraph (4), the proprietor of
a European patent may also demand reasonable compensation from
any person who, after the publication referred to in paragraph
(1) of the mention of the grant of the European patent, has
performed acts as referred to in that paragraph with regard to
products that were put on the market during the period
stipulated in that paragraph. The proprietor of the patent may
demand similar compensation from any person who, after the
publication referred to in paragraph (1), has used for his
business products as specified in Article 53(1)(a) or (b) that
were manufactured in his business in the period referred to in
paragraph (1).
3. The compensation referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2) shall
only be due for acts performed after the expiry of 30 days
following the date on which the party concerned was informed by
means of a writ of the right to which the proprietor of the
patent is entitled by virtue of this Article. This writ,
indicating precisely which part of the patent application
relates to such acts, shall be accompanied by the notification
of a translation into Dutch of the claims as contained in the
publication of the European patent application in accordance
with Article 93 of the European Patent Convention. If such
translation was sent to the Office prior to the serving of the
writ and an entry made in the patent register regarding it,
notification of the translation may be omitted, provided that
the writ makes a mention of the entry in the patent register.
4. The right that belongs to the proprietor of a patent by
virtue of this Article shall not extend to acts performed by a
person entitled to do so by virtue of Article 55 or an
agreement, nor shall it extend to acts with regard to products
that were put on the market either prior to the publication of
the application under paragraph (1) in accordance with Article
93 of the European Patent Convention, or thereafter by the
applicant or a person entitled to do so as specified above.
5. The Office shall provide as soon as possible for the entry in
the patent register specified in paragraph (3).
6. Paragraphs (3) and (5) shall apply mutatis mutandis with
respect to claims for payments of reasonable compensation as
provided in Article 32(1) of the Community Patent Convention.
Art. 73.
1. The proprietor of the patent may institute the claims at his
disposal in enforcing his patent against any person who, in the
Netherlands or Netherlands Antilles or, where a European patent
is concerned, in the Netherlands, supplies or delivers to or for
his business, in respect of an essential part of the invention,
to persons other than those who by virtue of Articles 55 to 60
are empowered to work the patented invention, the means for the
application of the patented invention in the Netherlands or
Netherlands Antilles, or where a European patent is concerned,
in the Netherlands, provided that that person knows, or that it
is evident considering the circumstances, that those means are
suitable and intended for that application.
2. Paragraph (1) shall not apply if the supply or delivery takes
place with the consent of the proprietor of the patent. That
paragraph shall likewise not apply if the means delivered or
offered are products which are generally available in commerce,
unless the person involved incites the third party to whom he
delivers to perform acts specified in Article 53(1).
3. Article 70(5) shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Art. 74.
The rights and obligations arising out of Articles 53 to 60 and
64 to 73 shall also apply in, on and above that part of the
continental shelf contiguous to the Netherlands or the
Netherlands Antilles -- or, where a European patent is
concerned, contiguous to the Netherlands -- over which the
Kingdom has sovereign rights, but exclusively to the extent that
such acts are associated with and are performed during
exploration for or the recovery of natural resources.
Chapter 5 Invalidation and Claiming
Entitlement to the Patent
Art. 75.
1. A patent shall be invalidated by the court where:
a. that for which the patent has been granted was unpatentable
by virtue of the provisions of Articles 2 to 7 or, where a
European patent is concerned, by virtue of the provisions of
Articles 52 to 57 of the European Patent Convention;
b. the patent specification does not contain a description of
the invention which, in appropriate cases with the application
of Article 25(2), is sufficiently clear and complete to allow a
person skilled in the art to work the invention;
c. the subject matter of the patent extends beyond the contents
of the patent application as filed or by the contents of the
original patent application if the patent has been granted on a
divisional or amended application or on a new European patent
application filed pursuant to Article 61 of the European Patent
Convention;
d. after the grant of the patent, the scope of protection has
been extended;
e. the proprietor of the patent was not entitled to it either by
virtue of the provisions of Chapter 1 of this Act or, where a
European patent is concerned, by virtue of Article 60(1) of the
European Patent Convention.
2. For the purposes of paragraph (1)(a), the state of the art
referred to in Article 54(3) of the European Patent Convention
shall also include the contents of patent applications under
this Act which were filed on a date prior to the date of filing
of the European patent application to which that paragraph
applies and which were entered in the patent register pursuant
to Article 31 on or after that date.
3. Invalidation proceedings may be instituted under paragraph
(1)(a) to (d) by any person, and under paragraph (1)(e) by a
person who is entitled to the patent by virtue of the provisions
specified therein. If the latter has been granted a patent for
the relevant invention, the invalidation proceedings may also be
instituted by licensees and pledgees.
4. The writ shall be recorded in the patent register within
eight days of its date of issue. Where the entry is not made in
due time, the claimant shall be obliged to pay compensation for
damages sustained by any persons who, after expiry of the time
limit and prior to the making of the entry, acquired in good
faith rights affected by the invalidation.
5. A patent shall be deemed from the outset not to have had all
or some of the effects specified in Articles 53, 71, 72 and 73
where the patent has been wholly or partially invalidated.
6. The retroactive effect of the invalidation shall not extend
to:
a. a decision, not being a provisional measure, relating to acts
infringing the exclusive right of the proprietor of the patent
referred to in Article 53 or relating to acts referred to in
Articles 71, 72 and 73 which have become res judicata and have
been enforced prior to the invalidation;
b. any agreement concluded prior to the invalidation insofar as
it has been implemented prior to the invalidation; on grounds of
equity, repayment of sums paid under the agreement may be
claimed to the extent justified by the circumstances.
7. For the purposes of paragraph (6)(b), the conclusion of an
agreement shall also be deemed to include a license created in
another manner provided for in Article 56(2), 59 or 60.
8. Where a patent is invalidated on the grounds of paragraph
(1)(e), and the person who is entitled to the patent by virtue
of the provisions referred to therein has obtained a patent for
the relevant invention himself, licenses acquired in good faith
in respect of the invalidated patent prior to the date on which
the writ of invalidation was recorded in the register shall be
deemed to be licenses under the existing patent. The proprietor
of said patent shall be entitled pursuant to Article 56(3) to
the fees due for the licenses. The proprietor of the invalidated
patent who acted in good faith when filing his application or
who obtained the patent in good faith from a previous proprietor
prior to the date on which the writ of invalidation was
registered shall, in relation to the subsisting patent, continue
to have the right to work the invention in the manner specified
in Article 55.
9. As soon as a decision in invalidation proceedings has become
res judicata or the proceedings have lapsed, an entry to this
effect shall be made in the patent register at the request of
the most diligent party.
Art. 76.
1. The action of a party seeking invalidation pursuant to
Article 75 of a patent issued pursuant to this Act shall not be
entertained if the party does not append to his statement of
claim the results of an advisory report by the Office concerning
the applicability of the grounds for invalidation as indicated
in Article 75(1).
2. The president of the District Court referred to in Article
80(2) may, in a summary proceeding, require any person arguing
that a patent granted pursuant to this Act should be invalidated
to submit an advisory report by the Office concerning the
applicability of the grounds of invalidation as indicated in
Article 75(1).
Art. 77.
1. Where a patent granted under this Act relates to an invention
in respect of which a European patent or Community patent has
been granted to the same inventor or his successor in title, and
where the dates of filing or, as the case may be, the priority
dates of the patent applications concerned are the same, the
former patent, insofar as it protects the same invention as the
European patent or the Community patent, shall cease to have the
effects specified in Articles 53, 71 and 73 in the Netherlands
as from the date on which:
a. the time limit laid down for filing notice of opposition to
the European patent has expired without notice of opposition
having been filed;
b. the opposition procedure has been concluded, resulting in
maintenance of the European patent; or
c. the patent has been granted under this Act, if that date is
later than the date referred to in subparagraph (a) or (b), as
the case may be.
2. The expiry, for whatever reason, of the European patent or
the Community patent at a later date shall not affect the
provisions of the preceding paragraph.
3. Proceedings to ascertain loss of rights as referred to in
paragraph (1) may be instituted by any person.
4. Article 75(4), (8), first sentence, and (9) shall apply
mutatis mutandis.
Art. 78.
1. An action claiming entitlement to a patent in whole, in part
or in joint ownership may be instituted by any person who, under
Articles 11, 12 or 13 or, where a European patent is concerned,
under Article 60(1) of the European Patent Convention, is
entitled to or is jointly entitled to the patent.
2. The writ claiming entitlement must be entered in the patent
register.
3. The proprietor of a patent who acted in good faith when
filing his application, or who obtained the patent in good faith
from a previous proprietor prior to the date on which the writ
claiming entitlement was registered, shall continue, vis-à-vis
the new proprietor, to have the right to work the invention in
the manner specified in Article 55.
4. Licenses obtained in good faith prior to the registration
date shall continue to have effect vis-à-vis the new proprietor
of the patent; the latter shall be entitled to compensation due
for licenses pursuant to the provisions of Article 56(3).
5. The provisions of paragraphs (3) and (4) shall not be
applicable if the person who has successfully claimed
entitlement to the patent previously claimed entitlement by
filing a patent application himself and the writ claiming
entitlement was entered in the patent register within three
months from the date on which the patent was granted or, where a
European patent is concerned, from the date on which, pursuant
to Article 97(4) of the European Patent Convention, the mention
of the grant of the European patent was published.
6. Pledges established by a previous proprietor of the patent
shall only be binding on the new proprietor of the patent if the
rights were acquired in good faith and the pledge was
established before the date on which the writ claiming
entitlement was registered. They shall not be binding on the new
proprietor in the event referred to in the preceding paragraph.
7. The claim referred to in paragraph (1) shall lapse upon
expiry of a period of two years from the date on which the
patent was granted or, where a European patent is concerned,
from the date on which, pursuant to Article 97(4) of the
European Patent Convention, the mention of the grant of the
European patent was published; such statute-barring may not,
however, be invoked by a person who knew or ought to have known
at the time of acquiring the patent that he, or the person who
assigned the patent to him, was not entitled to it. Article 2006
of the Civil Code of the Netherlands Antilles shall not apply to
this limitation.
8. As soon as a decision on a claim to entitlement has become
res judicata or the proceedings have lapsed, an entry to this
effect shall be made in the patent register at the request of
the most diligent party.
Art. 79.
1. Any person who deliberately infringes the rights of the
patent proprietor by performing one of the acts specified in
Article 53(1) shall be punished with imprisonment for no more
than six months or a fine of the fourth category.
2. Any person who makes a profession or a business of criminal
acts as referred to in the preceding paragraph shall be punished
with imprisonment for no more than four years or a fine of the
fifth category.
3. The court may order publication of the judgment on
sentencing.
4. If any objects have been declared forfeit, the patent
proprietor may require that these objects be surrendered to him,
provided that he reports this to the clerk within a month of the
judgment having become res judicata. Such surrender shall confer
title to these objects on the patent proprietor. The court may
declare that the surrender shall not take place or shall take
place only after compensation, to be set by the court and paid
by the patent proprietor, has been paid to the State.
5. The criminal acts referred to in this Article shall be
misdemeanors. In the Netherlands, the hearing of such
misdemeanors in the first instance shall be exclusively within
the jurisdiction of the District Court of The Hague.
Chapter 6
Disputes Concerning Patent Rights
Art. 80.
1. The District Court of The Hague shall have exclusive
jurisdiction in the first instance for:
a. actions to determine the absence of legal effect, the
invalidation, or the loss of legal effect of a patent or to
determine claims to entitlement to a patent as referred to in
Articles 10, 75, 77 and 78;
b. actions claiming entitlement to European patent applications;
c. actions seeking the grant of licenses as referred to in
paragraph (1) of Article 58;
d. actions seeking the award of remuneration as referred to in
Articles 58, 59 and 60.
2. The District Court of The Hague, and the President of that
Court in summary proceedings, shall have exclusive
first-instance jurisdiction in the Netherlands with respect to:
a. actions referred to in Articles 70, 71, 72 and 73;
b. actions instituted by some person other than the proprietor
of the patent to obtain a ruling that certain acts performed by
him do not constitute infringement of a patent.
Art. 81.
1. Any person directly affected by a decision issued by virtue
of this Act or provisions thereunder may appeal within one month
of the issue of the decision concerned to the Court specified in
Article 80. Article 4(4), second and third sentences, of the Act
Concerning Administrative Jurisdiction (Stb. 1954, 416) shall
apply.
2. The Court may annul a decision referred to in paragraph (1),
and decide on the consequences of the annulment in its judgment.
The Court may rule that the Office or the Minister shall make,
repeal or amend a decision in accordance with the judgment or
shall take or refrain from action.
Art. 82.
Authorized representatives shall be permitted to plead on behalf
of the parties in the hearing of the disputes referred to in
Articles 80 and 81 without prejudice to the responsibility of
counsel.
Art. 83.
1. All disputes other than those specified in Articles 80 and 81
shall be brought before the court which has jurisdiction under
the general rules governing the administration of justice.
2. Proceedings instituted under the provisions of Article 12(6)
shall be deemed to be proceedings relating to a contract of
employment except where legal relationship between those
involved is not determined by such a contract.
3. Where it appears to the court that a decision on a matter in
dispute may be affected by proceedings instituted or possibly to
be instituted under Articles 10, 75, 77 or 78, the court may
stay the proceedings relating to the matter in dispute, with or
without setting a time limit. The court may also so act where a
decision relating to such proceedings may be affected by
proceedings instituted on different grounds.
4. The court may stay proceedings relating to a dispute in
respect of a European patent, with or without setting a time
limit, where notice has been given to the European Patent Office
of opposition to that patent by virtue of Article 99 of the
European Patent Convention.
Art. 84.
1. Any person may request the Office in writing to provide an
advisory report on the applicability of the grounds for
invalidation specified in Article 75(1) to a patent granted on
the basis of this Act.
2. The request shall contain a reasoned indication of the
objections derived from Article 75(1) to the granted patent
concerning which an advisory report is requested.
3. Rules concerning the fee to be paid for an advisory report
shall be enacted by administrative order.
Art. 85.
1. The Office shall give the petitioner indicated in Article 84
the opportunity to explain the objections made. The proprietor
of the patent concerned shall be given the opportunity to
respond to the objections at least once.
2. The Office is authorized to set time limits within which the
petitioner and patent proprietor must make their submissions.
3. The advisory report referred to in Article 84 shall be issued
as soon as possible, but no more than two months after the
Office has been informed of the views of the petitioner and the
patent proprietor, or, if the preceding paragraph is applicable,
within two months of the expiration of the time limit set.
Art. 86.
The advisory report referred to in Article 84 shall consist of a
reasoned evaluation of the objections stated in the request.
Art. 87.
1. The Office shall be obliged to provide the court with all
information and technical advice that it may require for a
decision in legal proceedings subject to its jurisdiction
concerning patents.
2. Advice as referred to in paragraph (1) shall be equal in
value to that of experts as referred to in Article 221 of the
Code of Civil Procedure.
Art. 88.
The Court referred to in Article 80 shall act as a central
authority responsible for the receipt of letters rogatory and
authorized to act on such letters from the European Patent
Office, referred to in Article 99 of the Implementing
Regulations to the European Patent Convention.
Art. 89.
A separate copy of all court decisions rendered in patent
matters shall be sent free of charge to the Office within one
month by the clerk of the court which has rendered the judgment
and, where a European patent is involved, also to the European
Patent Office referred to in the European Patent Convention.
Chapter 7
Supplementary Protection Certificates
Art. 90.
For the purposes of this Chapter, with the exception of Article
98 and the provisions based on it:
"Regulation" means Council Regulation (EEC) No. 1768/92 of June
18, 1992, Concerning the Creation of a Supplementary Protection
Certificate for Medicinal Products (PbEG L 182);
"basic patent" means a patent as indicated in Article 1(c) of
the Regulation;
"certificate" means a supplementary protection certificate as
indicated in Article 1(d) of the Regulation.
Art. 91.
The application for a certificate shall be filed at the Office.
Art. 92.
Upon application for a certificate, proof must be provided that
an amount, in accordance with a tariff to be set by decree, has
been paid to the Office.
Art. 93.
With reference to applications for a certificate, Articles
24(3), 26 and 38(1) of this Act shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Art. 94.
If the provisions of Article 8 of the Regulation or Articles 92
and 93 of this Act are not satisfied, the Office shall so inform
the applicant in writing within one month of the filing of the
application for a certificate, stating the requirements which
have not been met. Article 30(2) shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Art. 95.
In order to maintain a certificate in force, an amount to be set
by decree shall be paid to the Office each year as from the year
in which the legal term of the basic patent has expired. This
amount shall be paid no later than on the last day of the month
in which the legal term of the basic patent has expired.
Articles 61(3) and 62 of this Act shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Art. 96.
1. The notifications required by Articles 9(2), 11 and 16 of the
Regulation shall be placed in the publication specified in
Article 20 of this Act.
2. The Office shall record the information specified in Articles
9(2), 11 and 16 of the Regulation in the patent register.
Art. 97.
Articles 64 to 69 inclusive shall apply to certificates mutatis
mutandis.
Art. 98.
If a regulation other than that established by the Council of
the European Communities concerning supplementary protection
certificates mentioned in Article 90 is required in the interest
of proper implementation, it shall take place by administrative
order. This can provide for fees, insofar as is permitted under
the regulation concerned.
Chapter 8
Special Provisions for the Netherlands Antilles
Art. 99.
An industrial property office may be established in the
Netherlands Antilles. That office shall be an institution of the
country.
Art. 100.
1. Patent applications may be filed by residents of the
Netherlands Antilles at the industrial property office
established there.
2. The date of filing of the application shall be deemed to be
the date upon which the documents indicated in Article 29(1)(a),
(b) and (c) are filed at the office concerned. Article 29(2) and
(3) shall apply mutatis mutandis.
3. After the office concerned has recorded the date referred to
in paragraph (2) on the application, it shall send the
application with all documents filed to the Office referred to
in Article 1 as soon as possible, unless it is of the opinion
that the filing does not meet the requirements specified in or
by virtue of Articles 24 and 26.
4. In the event referred to in paragraph (3), the office shall
inform the applicant of the alleged deficiencies in writing,
with the request that he remedy these deficiencies within a time
limit to be set by the office. After expiry of that time limit,
and regardless of whether or not the request has been fulfilled,
the documents filed by the applicant, accompanied by a copy of
the receipt issued to him, shall be sent by the office concerned
to the Office referred to in Article 1 as soon as possible.
Chapter 9
Transitional and Final Provisions
Art. 101.
The Patents Act of the Kingdom (last amended in 1987) is
repealed with effect from a time to be set by Royal Decree.
Art. 102.
1.a. Patent applications filed prior to the entry into force of
this Act and divisional patent applications arising from these
applications.
b. patents granted on the applications referred to in (a),
above, and
c. licenses under the patents referred to in (b), above,
shall be governed exclusively by the provisions of the 1987 Act
and provisions thereunder.
2.a. Patent applications filed after the entry into force of
this Act, with the exception of the divisional patent
applications referred to in paragraph (1)(a),
b. patents granted on the applications referred to in (a),
above, and
c. licenses under the patents referred to in (b), above,
shall be governed exclusively by the provisions of this Act and
provisions thereunder.
3. This Act shall not apply to applications for certificates as
referred to in Article 90 filed at the Office prior to the date
upon which this Act enters into force.
4. Articles 95 and 97 shall also apply to certificates granted
on applications filed prior to the date upon which this Act
enters into force.
Art. 103.
1. European patents the mention of the grant of which has been
published in accordance with Article 97(4) of the European
Patent Convention prior to the entry into force of this Act, and
licenses under these patents, shall be governed exclusively by
the provisions of the 1987 Act and provisions thereunder.
2. European patents the mention of the grant of which has been
published in accordance with Article 97(4) of the European
Patent Convention after the entry into force of this Act, and
licenses under these patents, shall be governed exclusively by
the provisions of this Act and provisions thereunder.
Art. 104.
Article 17A of the 1987 Act is amended as follows:
1. In the first paragraph, "If the applicant" is replaced by: If
the applicant or patent proprietor or the proprietor of a
European patent.
2. In the second paragraph, "payment, admissible after the due
date, that has not been effected punctually," is deleted.
3. In the third paragraph, "or, if it concerns a European
patent, within the Netherlands" is added after "Kingdom" and in
the sixth paragraph, "or has been maintained" is added after
"has been granted".
Art. 105.
Article 22K, paragraph (1), of the 1987 Act shall read:
1. An application shall lapse if a request as referred to in
Article 22J is not filed within one year of the entry into force
of the 1995 Act.
Art. 106.
Article 29Q of the 1987 Act is repealed.
Art. 107.
In Article 54 of the 1987 Act, a new paragraph (3) is inserted
after paragraph (2) and the former paragraph (3) is renumbered
(4), said new paragraph (3) reading as follows:
3. Authorized representatives may plead on behalf of parties in
proceedings for the settlement of the disputes referred to in
paragraphs (1) and (2), without prejudice to the responsibility
of counsel.
Art. 108.
1. By derogation from Article 102(1)(c), with respect to
licenses, Articles 57(2) to (4) and 58 of this Act shall replace
Article 34(2) to (9) of the 1987 Act.
2. If, prior to the entry into force of this Act, a request is
made for the grant of a license in accordance with Article 34(5)
of the 1987 Act, the first paragraph shall not apply.
Art. 109.
The state of the art, referred to in Article 4, shall also
comprise the contents of patent applications filed before the
entry into force of this Act, which are laid open to public
inspection in accordance with Article 22C of the 1987 Act or
which, if they were not laid open to public inspection, are
published, in accordance with Article 25 of the 1987 Act, on or
after the date referred to in Article 4(2).
Art. 110.
If the matters provided for in this Act require further
regulation in the interest of the proper implementation thereof,
this may take place by administrative order.
Art. 111.
This Act shall enter into force at a time to be set by Royal
Decree, which may differ for the various articles or parts
thereof.
Art. 112.
This Act is to be referred to as the Patents Act of the Kingdom
with the mention of the year of the Official Gazette in which it
has been published.
Art. 113.
1. This Act shall be binding on the Netherlands and, with the
exception of Chapter 7, on the Netherlands Antilles.
2. This Act is binding on Aruba only with respect to Articles 40
to 45, 59, 101, 102(1), 105, 108, 111 and 114.
For the application of Articles 40 to 45 in Aruba, "Office"
shall be defined as the Office for Intellectual Property of
Aruba.
Art. 114.
The common regulations provided for in this Act may be ended by
Act in the Netherlands and by local enactment in the Netherlands
Antilles and Aruba. With effect from the third calendar year
following the year in which such an Act or local enactment is
published, this shall acquire the status of a national Act in
the Netherlands and of a local enactment in the Netherlands
Antilles. The provisions of the previous sentences shall not
apply to Articles 40 to 45 and Article 59. |