|
Annual Report
1999
CHAPTER 4 - PUBLICATIONS, LECTURES AND OTHER
ACTIVITIES IN 1999
Lodewijk Asscher
Project researcher.
‘Een
zorg voor de nieuwe Grondwetscommissie’, Mediaforum 1999-2,
p. 41.
Guest commentary following the appointment of a committee which
will advise on constitutional rights in the digital age. Warning
against including a duty to ensure pluriformity in the Constitution.
‘Subsidie
voor olifantenpoep. Of: hoe vrij is de kunst?’, Mediaforum
1999-13, pp. 333-334.
In New York, Mayor Giuliani tried to influence museum policy with
subsidies. By doing so he was acting contrary to the First Amendment.
How would a case like this be decided in the Netherlands?
(with Wouter Hins, Bernt Hugenholtz, Erik Jurgens, Willem Korthals
Altes, Frank Kuitenbrouwer and Aernout Nieuwenhuis), ‘Preadvies
inzake een nieuwe tekst voor de artikelen 7 en 13 van de Grondwet’,
Mediaforum 1999-11/12, Appendix pp. I-VIII.
[description, see Wouter Hins]
Constitutionele
convergentie van pers, omroep en telecommunicatie, Deventer:
Kluwer 1999 (ITeR series no. 26), 149 p.
This book reviews the extent of developments in information
technology necessitate amendment of Articles 7 (freedom of expression)
and 13 (confidentiality of communication). The bottlenecks in the
current protection of the freedom of communication are listed and an
outline is given regarding the position of the Constitution in the
international legal order. Three scenarios provide options for an
amendment of the Constitution which could lead to more adequate
protection.
Annotations:
US
Court of Appeals (9th C) 6 May 1999, Bernstein v. United States, Mediaforum
1999-10, pp. 279-286.
This annotation analyses how the American court came to the
conclusion that encryption programs – under certain circumstances
– are a protected form of expression under the First Amendment. A
comparison is made with constitutional protection of software in the
Netherlands.
Positions:
- secretary of the Association for Media and Communications Law
(VMC);
- secretary of the VMC study committee on the revision of Articles 7 and
13 of the Constitution.
©1999 Institute for Information Law
UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM |