Publicaties

Verschillende publicaties met betrekking tot Creative Commons zijn hieronder opgesomd.

  • C.J. Angelopoulos, Creative Commons and Related Rights in Sound Recordings: Are the Two Systems Compatible? december 2009.

    Technically it is entirely possible to attach a Creative Commons license to a sound recording - but does the law permit it? This study examines the rights of performers and producers in the sound recordings they create, the collective management systems in place for the exploitation of those rights, and the relevant terms of the Creative Commons licenses. On this basis, it attempts to assess whether Creative Commons licenses can be attached to sound recordings, whether the use of such licenses can be combined with the collective management of related rights in sound recordings and, if so, under what circumstances and conditions this can be achieved.

  • L. Guibault, Auteursrecht en Open leermiddelen, Amsterdam: Instituut voor Informatierecht juni 2009. Onderzoek in opdracht van Kennisnet.
  • L. Guibault, Creative Commons: Struggling to ‘Keep it Simple’, in E. Schweighofer & P. Sint (red.), Conference Proceedings KnowRight 08, Wenen: Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft 2008, p. 75-83.
  • L. Guibault, Halleluja: Buma's aansluitvoorwaarden krijgen zegen van NMa!, AMI, 2008-4, p. 85-93.
  • M.M.M. van Eechoud & B. van der Wal, Creative commons licensing for public sector information: Opportunities and pitfalls, Institute for Information Law, 2007.
    The Creative Commons model seems an attractice instrument for public sector bodies that seek to enhance transparent access to their information, be it for purposes of democratic accountability or re-use for economic or other uses. This study examined that hypothesis and highlights the major opportunities and pitfalls of the Creative Commons model for public sector information. It assesses where there is a match between the creative commons model and the principles of freedom of information law and the Public Sector Information Directive (EC Directive 2003/98 on the re-use of public sector information) as implemented in the new chapter V-A of the Dutch Freedom of Information Act (Wet Openbaarheid van Bestuur). The assessment was made not only at the more principled, abstract level, but also at the level of the individual licensing terms. It is preceded by an analysis of government information as subject of intellectual property rights, under the Dutch Copyright Act and the Database Act.
  • P.B. Hugenholtz, Creative Commons and Author's Rights: Les extrèmes se touchent, lezing gegeven bij Duke Law School op 24 oktober 2005.
    De powerpoint presentie is hier te vinden.

    Conceived from radically different visions of copyright, American-bred Creative Commons and Old Europe-style authors' rights (droit d'auteur) have more in common than initially meets the eye. Focusing on the rights and freedoms of creators, both systems recognize certain inalienable moral rights, such as a right to attribution and a right of integrity. Moreover, for both systems to achieve their professed goals, it is vital that copyright in works of authorship remain with the actual creators, and not be transferred to the media companies or collecting societies that wish to exploit them. Therefore, certain statutory limits to freedom of contract aimed at preventing (overly) broad grants of rights are required. Strong author-protective contract rules currently exist in many traditional authors' rights countries, such as France and Germany, and may serve as examples for the United States.
  • N. Hendriks, Creative Commons in Nederland: flexibel auteursrecht, AMI, 2006-1, p. 1-7.
    Sinds 2004 zijn de Nederlandse versies van de Creative Commons-licenties beschikbaar. In dit artikel zal een beeld worden geschetst van het ontstaan en de onderliggende ideeën van Creative Commons. Verder zal worden ingegaan op de doelgroep van Creative Commons, het gebruik en de inhoud van de licenties en de omzetting naar Nederlands recht.
  • E. Hoorn, Rapport Creative Commons Licences for cultural heritage institutions”.

 

 

 


Bijgewerkt 04.12.2009